RESUMEN

Background: While there is some evidence in the literature demonstrating success in using a triage software application in ED, none of the solution was developed specifically to support a holistic decision of pediatricians in triage and diagnosis purposes to initiate the first treatment properly. To explore the usefulness and possibility of employing a digital-based solution to enhance clinician performance, the mobile application was developed and then assessed in different perspectives. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to contribute implementation practice of an application to support pediatric triage and diagnoses. The secondary objective is to present the results of the preliminary evaluation of the application. Methods: The application called Pedicmeter was developed. Formative tests with revisions were applied throughout the development phase. A number of summative extensive evaluations were also conducted to investigate the efficacy of the proposed method. The evaluation focused on measuring the ability of an application to support a pediatric staff's decision to determine an overall severity level and disease diagnosis. Finally, the user's (clinician's) satisfaction of using the application was measured. Results: The application Pedicmeter enables clinicians to make more accurate decisions in determining emergency level of pediatric patients by 6.66%. The application accurately diagnosed a disease with 73.08% accuracy and 66.67% accuracy for respiratory and infectious diseases, respectively. The diagnostic information that the application suggested shows that it does have an influence on a clinician's diagnosis. Using the app showed improvements in diagnostic accuracy for asthma, croup, sepsis, but it showed a decrease in the accuracy of a clinician's decision for pneumonia. The benefit of the application that satisfies the pediatricians the most is the helpfulness of the features of the application (86%), while the least satisfying factor was the required number of inputs (63%). Conclusion: The developed application conceptually shows a promising opportunity to enhance clinicians' decisions from the pilot study. However, the study also reveals further tweaks are required and unveils challenging issues and the concerns of clinician users when use the application. Further research will be conducted to investigate and determine the limiting factors and specific issues revealed by this study. Longitudinal data collection and analysis also need to be conducted to investigate the clinical implications.

RESUMEN

Introduction: A reliable pediatric triage tool is essential for nurses working in pediatric emergency departments to quickly identify children requiring priority care (high-level emergencies) and those who can wait (low-level emergencies). In the absence of a gold standard in France, the objective of our study was to validate our 5-level pediatric triage tool -pediaTRI- against the reference tool: the Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) System. Materials and Methods: We prospectively included 100,506 children who visited the Pediatric Emergency Department at Lenval Children's Hospital (Nice, France) in 2016 and 2017. The performance of pediaTRI to identify high-level emergencies (severity levels 1 and 2) was evaluated in comparison with a PEWS ≥ 4/9. Data from 2018-19 was used as an independent validation cohort. Results: pediaTRI agreed with the PEWS score for 84,896 of the patients (84.5%): 15.0% (14.8-15.2) of the patients were over-triaged and 0.5% (0.5-0.6) under-triaged compared with the PEWS score. pediaTRI had a sensitivity of 76.4% (74.6-78.2), a specificity of 84.7% (84.4-84.9), and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 5.0 (4.8-5.1) and 0.3 (0.3-0.3), respectively, for the identification of high-level emergencies. However, the positive likelihood ratios were lower for patients presenting with a medical complaint [4.1 (4.0-4.2) v 10.4 (7.9-13.7 for trauma), and for younger children [1.2 (1.1-1.2) from 0 to 28 days, and 1.9 (1.8-2.0) from 28 days to 3 months]. Conclusion: pediaTRI has a moderate to good validity to triage children in a Pediatric Emergency Department with a tendency to over-triage compared with the PEWS system. Its validity is lower for younger children and for children consulting for a medical complaint.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated prehospital professionals' accuracy, speed, interrater reliability, and impression in a pediatric disaster scenario both without a tool ("No Algorithm"-NA) and with 1 of 5 algorithms: CareFlight (CF), Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) and JumpSTART (J-START), Pediatric Triage Tape (PTT), Sort, Assess, Life-saving interventions, Treatment/Transport (SALT), and Sacco Triage Method (STM). METHODS: Prehospital professionals received disaster lectures, focusing on 1 triage algorithm. Then they completed a timed tabletop disaster exercise with 25 pediatric victims to measure speed. A predetermined criterion standard was used to assess accuracy of answers. Answers were compared to one another to determine the interrater reliability. RESULTS: One hundred and seven prehospital professionals participated, with 15-28 prehospital professionals in each group. The accuracy was highest for STM (89.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 85.7% to 92.2%) and lowest for PTT (67.8%; 95% CI 63.4% to 72.1%). Accuracy of NA and SALT tended toward undertriage (15.8% and 16.3%, respectively). The remaining algorithms tended to overtriage, with PTT having the highest overtriage percentage (25.8%). The 3 fastest algorithms were: CF, SALT, and NA, all taking 5 minutes or less. STM was the slowest. STM demonstrated the highest interrater reliability, whereas CF and SALT demonstrated the lowest interrater reliability. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the most common challenges inherent to mass casualty incident (MCI) triage systems: as accuracy and prehospital professional interrater reliability improve, speed slows. No triage algorithm in our study excelled in all these measures. Additional investigation of these algorithms in larger MCI drills requiring collection of vital signs in real time or during a real MCI event is needed.

RESUMEN

Objective. Triage in resource-limited settings (RLS) improves outcomes. Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment (ETAT) is a simple triage algorithm that improves assessment and initial management of children in RLS. In Belize, pediatric triage varies with setting, from a 5-level Emergency Severity Index (ESI) used at the National Referral Hospital to a lack of triage at government health centers (GHC). Most data on ETAT implementation are in settings where no triage system existed; data on how to integrate ETAT into existing, heterogeneous triage systems are lacking. The aim of this study is to explore health care providers' (HCPs) attitudes toward the current triage system prior to national pediatric triage process implementation. Methods. A qualitative study was performed via convenience sampling of HCPs who participated in an ETAT training course using focus groups immediately and 1 year after an initial ETAT training. Focus groups were digitally recorded and transcribed. Three coders analyzed all transcripts to identify emerging themes. Constant comparison analysis was performed until achieving thematic saturation. Results. The following principal themes emerged: (1) importance of triage education and implementation to standardize and improve communication; (2) major limitations of ESI include its complexity, lack of pediatric-specific criteria, and dependence on equipment not consistently available; and (3) desire to implement a simple, low-resource pediatric-specific triage system. Conclusions. Participants believe triage education and process implementation is essential to improve communication and pediatric emergency care. Simple, low-resource pediatric-specific triage systems, like ETAT, may improve utilization by providing faster recognition and improved care for acutely ill children.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: It was previously difficult to compare the accuracy of different mass casualty triage systems to one another. This pilot study is one of the first attempts to operationalize an expert panel's criterion standard definitions of triage categories in a pediatric population in order to compare accuracy between different systems. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of 4 different mass casualty triage systems (SALT, JumpSTART, Triage Sieve, and CareFlight) when used for children. METHODS: We observed the emergency department triage of patients less than 18 years old presenting to the only pediatric specialty hospital/Level 1 trauma center in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. A single, certified EMS provider observed each patient's initial triage in the emergency department and recorded all findings that were necessary to categorize the patient using each of the 4 mass casualty triage systems being studied. Hospital medical records were then reviewed for each patient and assigned a criterion standard triage category based on the treatments received and final disposition. Descriptive statistics were used to compare accuracy, over-, and under-triage rates for each of the triage systems. RESULTS: A total of 115 subjects were enrolled. Of those, 51% were male and 57% were transported by ambulance. When compared to the criterion standard definitions, SALT was found to have the highest accuracy rate (59%; 95% CI 50-68) compared to JumpSTART (57%; 95% CI 48-66), CareFlight (56%; 95% CI 47-65), and TriageSieve (56%; 95% CI 46-65). SALT also had the lowest under-triage rate (33%; 95% CI 24-42) compared to JumpSTART (39%; 95% CI 30-48), CareFlight (39%; 95% CI 30-48), and TriageSieve (39%; 95% CI 30-48). SALT had the highest over-triage rate (6%; 95% CI 2-11) compared to JumpSTART (4%; 95% CI 1-8), CareFlight (5%; 95% CI 1-9), and TriageSieve (5%; 95% CI 1-9). However, the confidence intervals for both the accuracy and under-triage rates overlapped between all triage systems. For each triage system, the most common error was designating a patient as "minimal" that, according to the criterion standard, should have been triaged as "delayed." CONCLUSION: We found that the 4 most popular mass casualty triage systems preformed similarly in an emergency department-based pediatric population. None of the systems were extremely accurate, and each demonstrated an unacceptable amount of under-triage. Better differentiating between patients categorized as "minimal" and "delayed" may improve the accuracy of mass casualty triage systems.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Danish Regions Pediatric Triage model (DRPT) was introduced in 2012 and subsequent implemented in most Danish acute pediatric departments. The aim was to evaluate the validity of DRPT as a screening tool to detect both the most serious acute conditions and the non-serious conditions in the acute referred patients in a pediatric department. METHOD: The study was prospective observational, with follow-up on all children with acute referral to pediatric department from October to December 2015. The DRPT was evaluated by comparison to a predefined reference standard and to the actual clinical outcomes: critically ill children and children returned to home without any treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and likelihood for positive and negative test were calculated. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty children were included. The DRPT categorized 7% very urgent, 28% urgent, 29% standard and 36% non-urgent. The DRPT was equal to the reference standard in 31% of the children (CI: 27-35%). DRPT undertriaged 55% of the children (CI: 51-59%) and overtriaged 14% of the children (CI: 11-17%). For the most urgent patients the sensitivity of DRPT was 31% (CI: 20-48%) compared to the reference standard and 20% (CI: 7-41) for critically ill. For children with non-urgent conditions the specificity of DRPT was 66% (CI: 62-71%) compared to the reference standard and 68% (CI: 62-75%) for the children who went home with no treatment. In none of the analyses, the likelihood ratio of the negative test was less than 0.7 and the positive likelihood ratio only reached more than 5 in one of the analyses. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to evaluate the DRPT triage system. From the very limited validity studies of other well-established triage systems, it is difficult to judge whether the DRPT performs better or worse than the alternatives. The DRPT errs to the undertriage side. If the sensitivity is low, a number of the sickest children are undetected and this is a matter of concern. CONCLUSION: The DRPT is a triage tool with limited ability to detect the critically ill children as well as the children who can be returned to home without any treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Disasters are defined as man-made or natural causes that disrupt a population and cause widespread human, material, economic, or environmental losses, exceeding that population's capacity to cope using its own resources. This review highlights the epidemiology and disease patterns in disasters, with specific application to the care of children in the austere environments created in the aftermath of disasters. The review also attempts to describe the experience from a firsthand field hospital perspective of a multinational team in caring for patients in the aftermath of two natural disasters in the Philippines, during both Typhoon Bopha and Typhoon Haiyan. In doing so, we will place these experiences in the context of the current literature on the subject of pediatric management during disaster emergencies and describe lessons learned to refine team approaches and patient care methodologies. The review also discusses methods for improvement in emergency preparedness for disasters, with specific mention of the roles of telemedicine and just-in-time simulation training, when feasible. Lastly, it will review the importance of community and military collaboration and planning for aftercare post-departure of foreign medical teams.