RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) between Defocus Incorporated Soft Contact (DISC) lenses and single-vision spectacles in Chinese children, in order to evaluate their visual performance and subjective acceptance of this bifocal designed contact lenses treatment. METHODS: Chinese participants aged 7 to 12 years, with myopia of -4.00 to -0.75 D, astigmatism < 1.50 D, and monocular best-corrected visual acuity 0.0 or better, were recruited in the study. All participants had been wearing DISC lenses, or single-vision spectacles, for the last 6 to 18 months and were requested to complete the routine ocular examination and Chinese version of the Pediatric Refractive Error Profile (PREP 2) questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 7 scales: vision, symptoms, appearance, activities, handling, peer perception, and overall score. According to their habitual correction modalities, fifty-four children were allocated to the DISC group and 56 to the single-vision spectacles group. A generalized linear model was fitted to assess variables associated with the PREP 2 score. RESULTS: Participants wearing DISC lenses scored significantly higher than those wearing single-vision spectacles for vision, appearance, activities, peer perception, and overall (all P < 0.05). The improvement of VRQoL in the DISC group was mainly represented in appearance, peer perception, and activities. The quality of life improved more for older participants on scales of vision, symptoms, handling, appearance, and overall score (all P < 0.05). The interaction between treatment and age was statistically significant for the activities scale (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DISC lens wear significantly improves VRQoL in Chinese children compared with single-vision spectacles for most of the survey scales, especially in the areas of appearance, peer perception, and activities. The benefits provided by DISC lenses contribute to greater satisfaction than single-vision spectacles for myopic children.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study compared quality of life (QoL) of myopic adults and children who were established spectacle, soft contact lens (SCL), or orthokeratology (OK) wearers as well as parent/child responses using Pediatric Refractive Error Profile 2 (PREP2). METHODS: Forty-eight adults (aged 18-26 years), 49 children (aged 9-17 years), and the children's parent, completed PREP2, with 7 subscales (symptoms, vision, activities, appearance, peer perception, handling, and overall). Adults and children must have worn their correction for at least three years. Parents were asked to answer how they thought their child would answer. Scores were compared between age groups, among correction groups, and between children and their parents using non-parametric ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests, as appropriate. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons among correction groups were conducted with Bonferroni adjustment. RESULTS: Average age of adults was 22 ± 2 and children was 14 ± 2 years, and duration of correction use was 8 ± 3 for adults and 5 ± 2 years for children (both p < 0.01). Adult OK wearers were more satisfied with vision (p = 0.04), activities (p < 0.001) and overall (p = 0.03) compared to spectacle wearers. Children OK wearers reported higher scores for activities than SCL (p = 0.048) and spectacle wearers (p < 0.001). Parents of contact lens wearers reported higher perceived QoL for activities (OK p < 0.001; SCL p = 0.02), handling (OK p = 0.02; SCL p < 0.001), appearance (SCL p = 0.001), and overall (OK p = 0.001; SCL p < 0.001) subscales than parents of child spectacle wearers. CONCLUSION: Activity-driven children and adults perceive significant benefits from OK over spectacles. Parents' perceptions did not align with their children's perceptions of their correction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of refractive errors in the pediatric population in Taif, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 7356 eyes of 3678 primary and secondary school children (males = 1837; females = 1841) with a mean age of 11.8 ± 2.2 years (range: 7-18) (males = 11.4 ± 2.0 [range: 8-16]; females = 12.2 ± 2.3 [range: 7-18]). All participants were selected from the school registers. The participants underwent noncycloplegic refraction to determine refractive errors. Students who refused visual acuity assessment or eye examination and were inconsistent in visual acuity assessment were excluded. RESULTS: The manifest refraction spherical equivalent of the study population was 0.37 ± 1.52 D (range from - 18.4 to 8.8 D) (males = -0.32 ± 1.4 D [range - 15.88-8.8 D]; females = -0.42 ± 1.6 D [range - 18.38-8.0 D]). The overall prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors among school children in this study was 50.91%. The overall distribution of astigmatism (cylinder error of ≥0.50 D) in the current study population was found to be 50.14% (3688/7356 eyes). CONCLUSION: Nearly half of the study population in this area was affected with at least one type of refractive error. The findings reveal the necessity for implementing timely and sensitive screening programs/methods to identify and correct refractive errors in this age group.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and evaluate an adapted Chinese version of the Pediatric Refractive Error Profile2 (PREP2) and to evaluate its acceptability, reliability, and validity in a population of Chinese children with refractive error. METHODS: The Chinese version of the PREP2 was translated using a standardized procedure and then administered to consecutive outpatients with refractive error. Reliability was assessed by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Validity of the questionnaire was assessed by item discriminant validity, construct validity, known-groups validity, and concurrent validity. RESULTS: A total of 104 subjects were recruited for the study and all completed the Chinese version of the PREP2 questionnaire with no problems. A random sample of 50 patients completed the questionnaire twice within one week. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.71 to 0.89 across scales, and the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.86 to 0.92, indicating excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The item-scale correlation coefficients between the items and the corresponding scales ranged from 0.39 to 0.88. The translated questionnaire had good discriminatory power between contact lens wearers and spectacle wearers. Significant correlations were found between the scales and traditional clinical parameters, such as spherical equivalent and uncorrected visual acuity, showing good construct and concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of the PREP2 exhibited good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, item-scale correlation, discriminatory power, construct validity, and concurrent validity. Therefore, it may be adopted as an acceptable, reliable, and valid instrument for the measurement of vision-related quality of life in Chinese children with refractive error.

Asunto(s)