RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly through language models like ChatGPT and ChatSonic, has gained substantial attention. This article explores the utilization of these AI models to address patient queries related to hypertension, emphasizing their potential to enhance health literacy and disease understanding. The study aims to compare the quality and reliability of responses generated by ChatGPT and ChatSonic in addressing common patient queries about hypertension and evaluate these AI models using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the Modified DISCERN scale. METHODS: A virtual cross-sectional observational study was conducted over one month, starting in October 2023. Ten common patient queries regarding hypertension were presented to ChatGPT (https://chat.openai.com/) and ChatSonic (https://writesonic.com/chat), and the responses were recorded. Two internal medicine physicians assessed the responses using the GQS and the Modified DISCERN scale. Statistical analysis included Cohen's Kappa values for inter-rater agreement. RESULTS: The study evaluated responses from ChatGPT and ChatSonic for 10 patient queries. Assessors observed variations in the quality and reliability assessments between the two AI models. Cohen's Kappa values indicated minimal agreement between the evaluators for both the GQS and Modified DISCERN scale. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the variations in the assessment of responses generated by ChatGPT and ChatSonic for hypertension-related queries. The findings highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and fact-checking of AI-generated responses.

RESUMEN

Periviable birth refers to births occurring between 20 0/7 and 25 6/7 weeks gestational age. Management of pregnant people and neonates during this fragile time depends on the clinical status, as well as the patient's wishes. Providers should be prepared to counsel patients at the cusp of viability, being mindful of the uncertainty of outcomes for these neonates. While it is important to incorporate the data on projected morbidity and mortality into one's counseling, shared-decision making is most essential to caring for these patients and optimizing outcomes for all.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction Preoperative anxiety refers to the feelings of unease, fear, or nervousness experienced by individuals before undergoing a surgical procedure. This anxiety can stem from various sources, including fear of the unknown, concerns about the surgical outcome, worries about pain or complications, and separation from loved ones during the procedure. Healthcare professionals can help minimize preoperative anxiety by employing various strategies and promoting better surgical experiences and outcomes. Hence, this study was designed to compare the effect of conventional preoperative verbal counseling versus preoperative verbal counseling using an anesthesia information sheet (AIS) on pre­operative anxiety of patients.  Methods A total of 80 patients were randomly placed into two groups of 40 each - preoperative verbal counseling (PC) and verbal counseling using an AIS. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) was used to assess preoperative anxiety in both the group's pre- and post-counseling. Data was collected and compiled. Data was analyzed using SSPS software. Pearson correlation coefficient was used for the correlation of age, gender, education status, and ASA grading with pre- and post-counseling anxiety scores. Results A significant difference was seen in anxiety score pre- and post-counseling between group PC and AIS (p-value <0.05). The anxiety score after counseling in group PC was 16.27±4.57, which was significantly higher compared to group AIS (14.25±2.42; p-value=0.016). Conclusion As we continue to explore innovative ways to improve patient experiences and outcomes, integrating AISs into counseling practices stands as a promising strategy that can lead to more confident and well-informed patients, ultimately enhancing the quality of healthcare delivery.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to identify and map how asynchronous digital two-way communication is used between patients and healthcare professionals after hospital discharge, as well as identify facilitators and barriers to implementation. METHODS: Following the JBI guidance for scoping reviews, we searched seven databases on August 29, 2022. Rayyan was employed for screening the articles, and data were extracted using a predefined and iteratively modified data extraction tool. Facilitators and barriers were systematically categorized according to the domains and constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS: Forty articles were included, primarily published between 2012 and 2022 and from the USA. In the majority of articles (77.5 %), asynchronous digital two-way communication was a part of a larger eHealth intervention. Nurses were the healthcare professionals most frequently mentioned as answering patients' messages (35 %) with response times sparsely described, and varying between four hours and three days. Efforts done to implement asynchronous digital two-way communication were only mentioned in 37.5 % of the articles. Facilitators included easy access, convenience, less disturbance, shared expectations for use and communication with professionals familiar to the patient. Barriers involved fear of overlooking health issues, risk of answers being delayed, technical issues and unclear response times. CONCLUSION: There is a gap in the literature between studies that describe the use of asynchronous digital two-way communication after hospital discharge exhaustively and reports on facilitators and barriers to implementation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This scoping review serves as an overview of the current use of asynchronous digital two-way communication after hospital discharge and sheds light on facilitators and barriers to implementation pertinent to this specific period.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Sickle cell disease (SCD), its treatments and cures present infertility risks. Fertility counseling is broadly indicated for affected girls and women and fertility preservation may appeal to some. Several streams of evidence suggest that the reproductive lifespan of women with SCD is reduced. Pregnancy is associated with high miscarriage rates. There are enduring questions about the effects of highly effective hydroxyurea treatment on female fertility. Current conditioning regimens for gene therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplant are gonadotoxic. Fertility preservation methods exist as non-experimental standards of care for girls and women. Clinicians are challenged to overcome multifactorial barriers to incorporate fertility counseling and fertility preservation care into routine SCD care. AREAS COVERED: Here we provide a narrative review of existing evidence regarding fertility and infertility risks in girls and women with SCD and consider counseling implications of existing evidence. EXPERT OPINION: Addressing fertility for girls and women with SCD requires engaging concerns that emerge across the lifespan, acknowledging uncertainty and identifying barriers to care, some of which may be insurmountable without public policy changes. The contemporary SCD care paradigm can offer transformative SCD treatments alongside comprehensive counselling that addresses fertility risks and fertility preservation opportunities.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: The aim of the study was to find tools to assess patient characteristics that would help in choosing between orthotopic neobladder and ileal conduit in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. An additional goal was to search for aids that improve preoperative counseling to support patients in the decision-making process. Methods: A systematic review of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was conducted, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, in April 2024. Inclusion criteria were specified in PICO format. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full papers. Upon study selection, the results and conclusions from the studies were abstracted and quantitatively summarized in the results section of this article. Results: Seven articles, involving a total 834 patients, were included. One article described frailty, two reviewed cognitive status, one article described functional dexterity, one described personality, two articles reviewed patients' values and goals, and one article reviewed role of patient-physician dialogue in the context of choosing UD after RC. The reviewed articles identified tools and approaches that could be valuable in evaluating the suitability for continent urinary diversion (CUD) or incontinent urinary diversion (ICUD). Conclusions: This is the first systematic review that summarizes the new available methods of patient assessment which improve preoperative counseling and choosing the most suitable UD after RC. Efficient tools for this purpose are still missing, and further studies that will aid in creating a simple aid for patient selection are necessary.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Online resources are important for patient self-education and reflect public interest. We described commonly asked questions regarding the direct anterior versus posterior approach (DAA, PA) to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the quality of associated websites. METHODS: We extracted the top 200 questions and websites in Google's "People Also Ask" section for 8 queries on January 8, 2023, and grouped websites and questions into DAA, PA, or comparison. Questions were categorized using Rothwell's classification (fact, policy, value) and THA-relevant subtopics. Websites were evaluated by information source, Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark Criteria (credibility), DISCERN survey (information quality), and readability. RESULTS: We included 429 question/website combinations (questions: 52.2% DAA, 21.2% PA, 26.6% comparison; websites: 39.0% DAA, 11.0% PA, 9.6% comparison). Per Rothwell's classification, 56.2% of questions were fact, 31.7% value, 10.0% policy, and 2.1% unrelated. The THA-specific question subtopics differed between DAA and PA (P < .001), specifically for recovery timeline (DAA 20.5%, PA 37.4%), indications/management (DAA 13.4%, PA 1.1%), and technical details (DAA 13.8%, PA 5.5%). Information sources differed between DAA (61.7% medical practice/surgeon) and PA websites (44.7% government; P < .001). The median Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark score was 1 (limited credibility, interquartile range 1 to 2), with the lowest scores for DAA websites (P < .001). The median DISCERN score was 55 ("good" quality, interquartile range 43 to 65), with the highest scores for comparison websites (P < .001). Median Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores were 12th grade level for both DAA and PA (P = .94). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' informational interests can guide counseling. Internet searches that explicitly compare THA approaches yielded websites that provide higher-quality information. Providers may also advise patients that physician websites and websites only describing the DAA may have less balanced perspectives, and limited information regarding surgical approaches is available from social media resources.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of the complications after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of intra-articular distal radius fracture (IADRF) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Methods: Medical records and outpatient follow-up records were retrospectively reviewed to collect medical, surgical, and complication data on consecutive patients who had undergone an ORIF procedure for an IADRF between January 2019 and June 2022. Data included demographics, comorbidities, injury, surgical characteristics, and laboratory findings on admission. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to identify the significant predictors, with a composite of any complications occurring within 12 months after the operation as the outcome variable and potentially a range of clinical data as the independent variables. The magnitude of the relationship was indicated by the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: During the study period, 474 patients were included, and 64 had documented complications (n = 73), representing an accumulated rate of 13.5%. Among them, carpal tunnel syndrome was the most common, followed by tenosynovitis caused by tendon irritation/rupture, superficial or deep wound infection, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1, radial shortening (≥4 mm), plate/screw problems, and others. The multivariate results showed the following factors significantly associated with increased risk of complications: experience of DRF surgery with <30 cases (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.6-3.5), AO type C fracture (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.9), initial lunate facet collapse of ≥5 mm (OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.4-8.9), and use of temporary external fixation before index surgery (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5-4.3). Conclusions: These findings may aid in patient counseling and quality improvement initiatives, and IADRF should be directed by an experienced surgeon.

RESUMEN

The journey of addressing fertility challenges, especially in the context of fallopian tubal issues, has witnessed remarkable advancements. This comprehensive review delves into microsurgery for fallopian tubal re-canalization within the era of in vitro fertilization (IVF). The review begins by providing the historical backdrop, tracing the evolution of this surgical technique, and highlighting the transformative impact of microsurgical methods and instrumentation on its precision and outcomes. Microsurgery for fallopian tubal re-canalization is characterized by a range of patient-specific considerations, diagnostic modalities, and factors influencing the choice between re-canalization and IVF. Microsurgical techniques are elaborated upon, showcasing the importance of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy, which not only diagnose but also treat tubal and uterine conditions. The review delves into the pivotal elements that steer the decision-making process, including patient preferences, medical necessity, ethical and religious considerations, financial constraints, and clinical evaluation. Furthermore, the intricate complications and risks associated with tubal re-canalization, both intraoperative and postoperative, are elucidated. Insights into recent advances in microsurgery, emerging research, and promising future directions set the stage for innovative and effective solutions. Recognizing the significance of patient counseling, shared decision-making, ethical considerations, and informed consent, the review underlines the critical role of healthcare providers in guiding individuals and couples through the complexities of fertility treatment choices. Finally, the conclusion synthesizes the key findings, implications for clinical practice, and future research directions, emphasizing the importance of tailored and patient-centered approaches to address fertility challenges in the modern era.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health literacy (HL) is the ability to make informed decisions using health information. As health data and information availability increase due to online clinic notes and patient portals, it is important to understand how HL relates to social determinants of health (SDoH) and the place of informatics in mitigating disparities. OBJECTIVE: This systematic literature review aims to examine the role of HL in interactions with SDoH and to identify feasible HL-based interventions that address low patient understanding of health information to improve clinic note-sharing efficacy. METHODS: The review examined 2 databases, Scopus and PubMed, for English-language articles relating to HL and SDoH. We conducted a quantitative analysis of study characteristics and qualitative synthesis to determine the roles of HL and interventions. RESULTS: The results (n=43) were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively for study characteristics, the role of HL, and interventions. Most articles (n=23) noted that HL was a result of SDoH, but other articles noted that it could also be a mediator for SdoH (n=6) or a modifiable SdoH (n=14) itself. CONCLUSIONS: The multivariable nature of HL indicates that it could form the basis for many interventions to combat low patient understandability, including 4 interventions using informatics-based solutions. HL is a crucial, multidimensional skill in supporting patient understanding of health materials. Designing interventions aimed at improving HL or addressing poor HL in patients can help increase comprehension of health information, including the information contained in clinic notes shared with patients.

RESUMEN

Introduction Fetal malpresentation is a complication of pregnancy in which the fetus does not present cephalically as required for vaginal birth. After a diagnosis is made, management options include cesarean section (CS) or external cephalic version (ECV). ECV is a procedure in which providers attempt to manually maneuver the fetus to cephalic position, allowing patients to attempt vaginal birth. Selecting between CS or ECV can be a complex and stressful decision, yet literature exploring patient perspectives on counseling of these options is limited. This study aims to describe patient perspectives on decision-making when diagnosed with fetal malpresentation. Methods We included English-speaking pregnant patients greater than 18 years of age diagnosed with malpresentation at 35-37 weeks' gestation. Patients who previously underwent CS or had maternal or fetal contraindications besides malpresentation to vaginal birth requiring CS were excluded. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants from four obstetric clinics in Baltimore, Maryland, at time of diagnosis. Themes were derived using data analysis in NVivo 11 (released 2015, Lumivero, USA). Results We recruited 10 participants (median age = 32 years, 90% Caucasian, 70% nulliparous, 50% chose ECV). We categorized our findings into the following themes: (1) facilitators and (2) barriers to deciding on malpresentation management, (3) participant priorities and values, and (4) other methods of malpresentation management. The participants identified incorporation of statistics and medical history into counseling as facilitators and the lack of information about ECV as a significant barrier. The participants prioritized fetal safety and, among those who chose ECV, a desire to avoid CS. Chiropractors, acupuncture, and moxibustion were identified as valuable additional methods of malpresentation management. Conclusion Overall, patients desire more information about ECV when diagnosed with fetal malpresentation. Uncertainty about ECV safety is a barrier to deciding between management options. Based on our findings, obstetric providers should provide comprehensive counseling on ECV and CS. Counseling should aim to demystify ECV and quantify risk in a patient-specific context. This will allow patients to make an informed decision on the management of fetal malpresentation that aligns with their goals for pregnancy.

RESUMEN

ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a language model that was developed by OpenAI and launched in November 2022, generates human-like responses to prompts using deep-learning technology. The integration of large language processing models into healthcare has the potential to improve the accessibility of medical information for both patients and health professionals alike. In this commentary, we demonstrated the ability of ChatGPT to produce patient information sheets. Four board-certified, maternal-fetal medicine attending physicians rated the accuracy and humanness of the information according to 2 predefined scales of accuracy and completeness. The median score for accuracy of information was rated 4.8 on a 6-point scale and the median score for completeness of information was 2.2 on a 3-point scale for the 5 patient information leaflets generated by ChatGPT. Concerns raised included the omission of clinically important information for patient counseling in some patient information leaflets and the inability to verify the source of information because ChatGPT does not provide references. ChatGPT is a powerful tool that has the potential to enhance patient care, but such a tool requires extensive validation and is perhaps best considered as an adjunct to clinical practice rather than as a tool to be used freely by the public for healthcare information.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Respiratory syncytial virus is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract illness globally in children aged <5 years. Each year, approximately 58,000 hospitalizations in the United States are attributed to respiratory syncytial virus. Infants aged ≤6 months experience the most severe morbidity and mortality. Until recently, prevention with the monoclonal antibody, palivizumab, was only offered to infants with high-risk conditions, and treatment primarily consisted of supportive care. Currently, 2 products are approved for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus in infants. These include the Pfizer bivalent recombinant respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein subunit vaccine, administered seasonally to the pregnant person between 32 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation, and the monoclonal antibody, nirsevimab, administered to infants aged up to 8 months entering their first respiratory syncytial virus season. With few exceptions, administering both the vaccine to the pregnant person and the monoclonal antibody to the infant is not recommended. All infants should be protected against respiratory syncytial virus using one of these strategies. Key considerations for pregnant individuals include examining available safety and efficacy data, weighing accessibility and availability, and patient preferences for maternal vaccination vs infant monoclonal antibody treatment. It will be critical for maternal-fetal medicine physicians to provide effective and balanced counseling to aid patients in deciding on a personalized approach to the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus in their infants.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential use of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, such as ChatGPT, in preoperative counseling for patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. SETTING: Single institution tertiary care center. METHODS: ChatGPT was used to generate presurgical educational information including indications, risks, and recovery time for five common head and neck surgeries. Chatbot-generated information was compared with information gathered from a simple browser search (first publicly available website excluding scholarly articles). The accuracy of the information, readability, thoroughness, and number of errors were compared by five experienced head and neck surgeons in a blinded fashion. Each surgeon then chose a preference between the two information sources for each surgery. RESULTS: With the exception of total word count, ChatGPT-generated pre-surgical information has similar readability, content of knowledge, accuracy, thoroughness, and numbers of medical errors when compared to publicly available websites. Additionally, ChatGPT was preferred 48% of the time by experienced head and neck surgeons. CONCLUSION: Head and neck surgeons rated ChatGPT-generated and readily available online educational materials similarly. Further refinement in AI technology may soon open more avenues for patient counseling. Future investigations into the medical safety of AI counseling and exploring patients' perspectives would be of strong interest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A. Laryngoscope, 134:2757-2761, 2024.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: This text seeks to describe a framework for delivering and executing a virtual patient counseling OSCE and compare student performance to the in-person alternative. Methods: A communication-based virtual patient counseling objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was created to fulfill the educational outcomes of a previously held in-person OSCE in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The virtual nature of this OSCE simulated a telehealth encounter, which has increased in utilization since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. This OSCE was offered twice in one semester - once as a formative assessment and once as a summative assessment. Student performance was mapped to learning outcomes and compared the previous year's in person performance. Results: The described virtual framework for executing the OSCE successfully decreased the time required and saw <1% change in overall performance from students when compared to the previous year in person which was not statistically significant. Conclusion: This framework for a virtual communication-based OSCE reduces time with a negligible impact on student performance compared to the in person alternative. Innovation: This work describes a telehealth virtual patient counseling model to replace the traditional patient counseling OSCE in pharmacy education with comparable outcomes.

RESUMEN

Three-dimensional printing is an innovative technology that has gained prominence in recent years due to its attractive features such as affordability, efficiency, and quick production. The technology is used to produce a three-dimensional model by depositing materials in layers using specific printers. In the medical field, it has been increasingly used in various specialties, including neurosurgery, cardiology, and orthopedics, most commonly for the pre-planning of complex surgeries. In addition, it has been applied in therapeutic treatments, patient education, and training wof medical professionals. In the field of obstetrics and gynecology, there is a limited number of studies in which three-dimensional printed models were applied. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of three-dimensional printing applications in the medical field, highlighting the few reported applications in obstetrics and gynecology. We also review all relevant studies and discuss the current challenges and limitations of adopting the technology in routine clinical practice. The technology has the potential to expand for wider applications related to women's health, including patient counseling, surgical training, and medical education.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Pharmacists have a responsibility in the treatment of patients. Interactions between food and drugs may lead to a loss of therapeutic effectiveness or drug toxicity. Our study's objectives were to assess pharmacists' knowledge of patient counseling with regard to informing the patient about taking the drug in relation to food, as well as community pharmacists' knowledge of any pharmaceutical instructions that must be given to patients when delivering the drug. The pharmacists were assessed using an interview questionnaire. The results showed a variation in the pharmacist's knowledge about the administration of the drug with food. The chief pharmacists had better knowledge of the proper food administration counseling than that of assistant pharmacists; the percentage of those who did not give the proper food counseling was 24 vs. 58%, respectively (P < 0.05). Only (21%) of pharmacists with more work experience provided proper counseling, while only 18.2 and 18.7% of pharmacists with moderate and low work experience provided proper counseling, respectively. The study showed the pharmacists' limited knowledge of drug administration with food and outdated counseling information. It is highly recommended that a continuous education system be encouraged and enforced by the ministry of health to update pharmacist's knowledge of dispensed drugs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Our neurosurgical unit adopted a model of shared decision-making (SDM) based on multidisciplinary clinics for vestibular schwannoma (VS). A unique feature of this clinic is the interdisciplinary counseling process with a surgeon presenting the option of surgery, an oncologist radiosurgery or radiotherapy, and a specialist nurse advocating for the patient. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. All new patients seen in the combined VS clinic and referred from the skull base multidisciplinary team (MDT) from beginning of June 2013 to end of January 2019 were included. Descriptive statistics and frequency analysis were carried out for the full cohort. Results: Three hundred and fifty-four patients presenting with new or previously untreated VS were included in the analysis. In our cohort, roughly one-third of patients fall into each of the treatment strategies with slightly smaller numbers of patients undergoing surgery than watch, wait and rescan (WWR) ,and SRS (26.6% vs. 32.8% and 37.9%, respectively). Conclusion: In our experience, the combined surgery/oncology/specialist nurse clinic streamlines the patient experience for those with a VS suitable for either microsurgical or SRS/radiotherapy treatment. Decision-making in this population of patients is complex and when presented with all treatment options patients do not necessarily choose the least invasive option as a treatment. The unique feature of our clinic is the multidisciplinary counseling process with a specialist nurse advocating and guiding the patient. Treatment options are likely to become more rather than less complex in future years making combined clinics more valuable than ever in the SDM process.

RESUMEN

Hair loss is devastating to the patient, but the diagnosis and treatment of alopecia are also difficult for primary care providers and even dermatologists. Given recent advances in the field, there has never been a more pressing time to reevaluate and improve upon the significant clinical skills needed to accurately diagnose and treat our patients with hair loss. This CME activity on alopecia is designed to (1) educate dermatologists in a simple, succinct fashion on the identification of, and the distinction between, the diverse types of hair loss and (2) discuss how to manage them.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Effective hair loss counseling requires an understanding of patients' experiences and how they are impacted by race, ethnicity, culture, resource accessibility, and mental health. Clear communication and expectation management are critical. Physicians can empower patients through validating patient attitudes and engaging in shared decision-making to offer treatment, support, or camouflage.

Asunto(s)