RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Glenoid tumors are extremely rare, and reconstruction remains very challenging. The aim of this study is to present the clinical and functional outcomes, of a new glenoid reconstruction method using 3-dimensional-printed implant. METHODS: Four patients with primary glenoid tumors underwent reconstruction using 3-dimensional-printed glenoid implant linked with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and functional outcome, using MSTS and DASH score, as well as complications' rate. RESULTS: Wide excision was achieved in all patients. No local recurrence or distant metastasis was diagnosed at the follow-up period. The mean MSTS score was 80.5%, and DASH score was 15.2%. According to Hendersons' classification, there were no postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The use of 3-dimensional-printed implants, can be a very reliable solution with satisfying clinical and functional outcomes for reconstruction, in patients with musculoskeletal malignancies of the glenoid. Level of evidence IV Treatment Study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neurovascular anatomy has not been previously quantified for the arthroscopic snapping scapula approach with the patient in the most frequent patient position ("chicken-wing" position). The purposes of this study were (1) to determine anatomic relationships of the superomedial scapula and neurovascular structures at risk during arthroscopic surgical treatment of snapping scapula syndrome (SSS), (2) to compare these measurements between the arm in the neutral position and the arm in the chicken-wing position, and (3) to establish safe zones for arthroscopic treatment of SSS. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric hemi-torsos (mean age, 55.8 years; range, 52-66 years) were dissected to ascertain relevant anatomic structure locations including the (1) spinal accessory nerve, (2) dorsal scapular nerve, and (3) suprascapular nerve. A coordinate measuring device was used to collect data on the relationships of anatomic landmarks and at-risk structures during the surgical approach. RESULTS: The dorsal scapular nerve was a mean of 24.4 mm medial to the superomedial scapula in the neutral position and 33.1 mm medial in the chicken-wing position (P < .001); the dorsal scapular nerve was 21.7 mm medial to the medial border of the scapular spine in the neutral position and 35.5 mm medial in the chicken-wing position (P < .001). The mean distance from the superomedial angle to the spinal accessory nerve intersection at the superior scapular border was 16.5 mm in the neutral position and 15.0 mm in the chicken-wing position (P = .031). The average distance from the superomedial angle to the closest point of the spinal accessory nerve was 11.6 mm and 10.4 mm in the neutral position and chicken-wing position, respectively (P = .039). CONCLUSION: Neurologic structures around the scapula vary significantly between the neutral arm position and the chicken-wing position commonly used in the arthroscopic treatment of SSS. The chicken-wing position improves safe distances for the dorsal scapular nerve during medial-portal placement and should be considered as a primary position for arthroscopic management of SSS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Chondromyxoid fibroma is a benign bone tumour accounting for less than 1% of all primary bone tumours. It usually affects the metaphyseal region of long bones in the first or second decade of life. It rarely occurs in scapula. We present a case of 29 year old female with biopsy proven Chondromyxoid fibroma of left scapula. She underwent wide marginal excision by partial scapulectomy with preservation of glenoid. Post operatively she has stable shoulder joint with normal range of movement & no recurrence on regular follow up.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is caused by bony and/or soft tissue impingement in the scapulothoracic articulation. Surgical resection of the superomedial angle (SMA) plus bursectomy can provide relief in most cases; however, the amount needed to achieve adequate scapulothoracic space decompression (SSD) is unknown. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of partial scapulectomy and the influence of bony anatomy on SSD. It was hypothesized that the anterior offset and costomedial angle would correlate with the amount of bony resection needed to achieve adequate SSD. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twenty pairs (n = 40) of shoulder specimens (mean age, 58 years [range, 41-64 years]; 10 male and 10 female specimens) were included. The scapula shape, medial scapula corpus angle (MSCA), anterior offset, and costomedial angle were obtained from computed tomography scans. Specimens were dissected, and each bare bony scapula was rigidly mounted. Points were collected using a 3-dimensional measuring arm. An SMA point and theoretical resection points (incremental 1-cm points up to 3 cm) proceeding laterally and medially were collected. The scapular plane was interpolated using points from the posterior scapular body. The horizontal distances of the anterior offset and each resection point to the scapular plane were calculated. The difference between the native anterior offset and the offset after resection represented the SSD. Adequate SSD was set at 5 mm. One-way analyses of variance and Pearson correlations were used with statistical significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: The maximum SSD with 3-cm resection was significantly correlated with the anterior offset ( R = 0.83, P < .001) as well as the costomedial angle ( R = -0.43, P = .006) but not the MSCA ( R = -0.11, P = .495) or scapula shape ( F2,37 = 0.39, P = .681). For the 5 scapulae with an anterior offset of less than 20 mm, a 5-mm SSD was not achieved. For 18 of 30 (60%) scapulae with an anterior offset between 20 mm and 35 mm, 3-cm resection provided at least a 5-mm SSD. For the 5 scapulae with an anterior offset of greater than 35 mm, 2-cm resection resulted in at least a 5-mm SSD in all cases. CONCLUSION: The anterior offset of the scapula appeared to be the most important bony parameter to consider during preoperative planning and the evaluation of SSD with partial scapulectomy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study may help surgeons with preoperative planning of surgical decompression of the scapulothoracic space for patients with symptomatic SSS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Scapular incongruity has been described as a contributing factor to the development of snapping scapula syndrome (SSS). The purpose of this retrospective case-control study was to determine the association between scapula bony morphology on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the diagnosis of SSS. METHODS: Bony morphologies of the scapula were evaluated on MRI scans of 26 patients with SSS and 19 patients with non-SSS pathologies. The medial scapula corpus angle (MSCA) was measured on axial MRI sequences. Scapulae were categorized as straight, S shaped, or concave. Two independent observers performed the measurements. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements of MSCA measurements were determined with intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Axial scapula bony morphology identified 28 scapulae of the straight type, 14 S-shaped scapulae, and 5 concave scapulae. All 5 concave scapulae had confirmed SSS. Measurement of the MSCA showed excellent interobserver agreement of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.89) and intraobserver agreement of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.82). There were significant differences in the mean MSCAs between shoulders with SSS (14.4° ± 19.3°) and non-SSS shoulders (-3.3° ± 15.3°, P = .001). The odds ratio was 8.4 (95% CI, 2.2 to 31.8) for positive MSCA and SSS. The scapulothoracic distance was significantly decreased in the SSS group (14.9 ± 5.8 mm) compared with the non-SSS patients (24.0 ± 6.7 mm, P < .001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Anterior angulation of the medial scapula in the axial plane was associated with SSS. Patients with a concave-shaped scapula and a positive MSCA have a 12-fold increased risk of SSS. The MSCA may prove helpful in determining the location and amount of scapular resection needed for patients with SSS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic scapulothoracic disorders, such as painful scapular crepitus and/or bursitis, are uncommon; however, they can produce significant pain and disability in many patients. PURPOSE: To review the current knowledge pertaining to snapping scapula syndrome and to identify areas of further research that may be helpful to improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We performed a preliminary search of the PubMed and Embase databases using the search terms "snapping scapula," "scapulothoracic bursitis," "partial scapulectomy," and "superomedial angle resection" in September 2013. All nonreview articles related to the topic of snapping scapula syndrome were included. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 167 unique articles, 81 of which were relevant to the topic of snapping scapula syndrome. There were 36 case series of fewer than 10 patients, 16 technique papers, 11 imaging studies, 9 anatomic studies, and 9 level IV outcomes studies. The level of evidence obtained from this literature search was inadequate to perform a formal systematic review or meta-analysis. Therefore, a critical review of current evidence is presented. CONCLUSION: Snapping scapula syndrome, a likely underdiagnosed condition, can produce significant shoulder dysfunction in many patients. Because the precise origin is typically unknown, specific treatments that are effective for some patients may not be effective for others. Nevertheless, bursectomy with or without partial scapulectomy is currently the most effective primary method of treatment in patients who fail nonoperative therapy. However, many patients experience continued shoulder disability even after surgical intervention. Future studies should focus on identifying the modifiable factors associated with poor outcomes after operative and nonoperative management for snapping scapula syndrome in an effort to improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Asunto(s)