RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has proved effective in the treatment of oligometastatic disease (1 or 2 colorectal liver metastases CRLM) with similar long-term outcomes and improved short-term results compared to open liver resection (OLR). Feasibility of parenchymal sparing LLR for high tumour burden diseases is largely unknown. Aim of the study was to compare short and long-term results of LLR and OLR in patients with ≥ 3 CRLM. METHODS: Patients who underwent first LR of at least two different segments for ≥ 3 CRLM between 01/2012 and 12/2021 were analysed. Propensity score nearest-neighbour 1:1 matching was based on relevant prognostic factors. RESULTS: 277 out of 673 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria (47 LLR and 230 OLR). After match two balanced groups of 47 patients with a similar mean number of CRLM (5 in LLR vs 6.5 in OLR, p = 0.170) were analysed. The rate of major hepatectomy was similar between the two group (10.6% OLR vs. 12.8% LLR). Mortality (2.1% OLR vs 0 LLR) and overall morbidity rates (34% OLR vs 23.4% LLR) were comparable. Length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the LLR group (5 vs 9 days, p = 0.001). No differences were observed in median overall (41.1 months OLR vs median not reached LLR) and disease-free survival (18.3 OLR vs 27.9 months LLR). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic approach should be considered in selected patients scheduled to parenchymal sparing LR for high tumour burden disease as associated to shorter LOS and similar postoperative and long-term outcomes compared to the open approach.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Hepatectomía , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Puntaje de Propensión , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Hepatectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Carga Tumoral , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodosRESUMEN
AIM: Robotic-assisted pancreatectomy has been widely used. Organ-preserving pancreatectomy (OPP) and parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy (PSP) has been gradually adopted for pancreatic benign or low-grade malignant tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted OPP/PSP in our institute. METHODS: Patients undergoing robotic-assisted OPS/PSP at First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between July 2015 and October 2021 were included in this study. The short-term and long-term outcomes of patients were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled, including spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, central pancreatectomy, duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, and enucleation. Patients included were more likely to be young female (female: 46/72, median age: 47 years old). The median intraoperative blood loss and operation time was 50 ml and 255 min, respectively. Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula was 20.8% (grade B: 15/72, 20.8%; no grade C). The overall complication rate was 22.2% with the median postoperative length-of-stay of 8 days. At a median follow-up time of 28.5 months, the 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rate were 100.0% and 100.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The short-term and long-term outcomes of patients receiving robotic-assisted OPP/PSP were acceptable. Robotic-assisted OPP/PSP was a feasible and safe technique for pancreatic benign or low-grade malignant lesions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Páncreas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Reported outcomes after surgical debulking in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM) are sparse. METHODS: NETLM patients that underwent surgical debulking from 2019 to 2021 were reviewed. Trends in perioperative liver function, complications, symptom response, and progression-free survival were examined. RESULTS: 1069 liver lesions were debulked from 53 patients using a combination of parenchymal-sparing resections (PSR) and ultrasound-guided microwave ablations (MWA). Post-operative transaminitis and thrombocytopenia were common, and severity correlated with increasing number of lesions. Laboratory markers for synthetic liver function did not differ according to the number of lesions debulked. 13% of patients sustained a Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or 4 complication which was not associated with the number of lesions targeted. All patients with preoperative symptoms had improvement after surgery. Median time to progression was 10.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: PSR with MWA for large numbers of NETLM is safe and effective for symptom control and does not affect synthetic liver function.
Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Hepatectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: The principle of hepatoblastoma (HB) treatment is complete resection. The removal of tumor-bearing section(s) or hemiliver is widely accepted. However, neither the standardized anterior approach for right hepatectomy nor parenchymal sparing anatomical liver resection has been described for HB. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical course of two pediatric HB patients who underwent extended right hepatectomy using the anterior approach with the liver hanging maneuver and one who underwent parenchymal sparing anatomical liver resection of S4 apical+S8 ventral/dorsal+S7. The critical aspects of surgical techniques are described in detail. Results: In all three patients, R0 resection was achieved without complications and are currently alive without recurrence after an average follow-up of 23 months. Intraoperative cardiac hemodynamics were stable, even in a trisomy 18 patient with cardiac disease. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that these innovative techniques established in adults are safe and feasible for HB in children. These techniques also allow optimal anatomical liver resection to accomplish curative surgery while maintaining the functional reserve of the remnant liver.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Parenchymal-sparing approaches to pancreatectomy are technically challenging procedures but allow for preserving a normal pancreas and decreasing the rate of postoperative pancreatic insufficiency. The robotic platform is increasingly being used for these procedures. We sought to evaluate robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy and assess its complication profile and efficacy. METHODS: This systematic review consisted of all studies on robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy (central pancreatectomy, duodenum-preserving partial pancreatic head resection, enucleation, and uncinate resection) published between January 2001 and December 2022 in PubMed and Embase. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies were included in this review (n = 788). Robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy is being performed worldwide for benign or indolent pancreatic lesions. When compared to the open approach, robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomies led to a longer average operative time, shorter length of stay, and higher estimated intraoperative blood loss. Postoperative pancreatic fistula is common, but severe complications requiring intervention are exceedingly rare. Long-term complications such as endocrine and exocrine insufficiency are nearly nonexistent. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy appears to have a higher risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula but is rarely associated with severe or long-term complications. Careful patient selection is required to maximize benefits and minimize morbidity.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The advantages of parenchymal-sparing resection (PSR) over anatomic resection (AR) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial. Here, we aim to evaluate their safety and efficacy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term perioperative outcomes and long-term oncological outcomes for PSR and AR were performed by searching Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were considered eligible (totally 7228 patients: AR, n = 3154 (43.6%) vs. PSR, n = 4074 (56.4%)). Overall survival (OS, HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.95-1.22, P = 0.245) and disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.94-1.28, P = 0.259) were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in 3-year OS, 5-year OS, 3-year DFS, 5-year DFS, 3-year liver recurrence-free survival (liver-RFS) and 5-year liver-RFS. In terms of perioperative outcome, patients undergoing AR surgery were associated with prolonged operation time (WMD = 51.48 min, 95% CI: 29.03-73.93, P < 0.001), higher amount of blood loss (WMD = 189.92 ml, 95% CI: 21.39-358.45, P = 0.027), increased intraoperative blood transfusion rate (RR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.54-3.26, P < 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (WMD = 1.00 day, 95% CI: 0.34-1.67, P = 0.003), postoperative complications (RR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.88-2.77, P < 0.001), and 90-day mortality (RR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.88-5.03, P < 0.001). While PSR surgery was associated with positive resection margins (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.97, P = 0.024), intrahepatic recurrence (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82-0.98, P = 0.021) and repeat hepatectomy (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55-0.76, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Considering relatively acceptable heterogeneity, PSR had better perioperative outcomes without compromising oncological long-term outcomes. However, these findings must be carefully interpreted, requiring more supporting evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023445332.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH), though technically challenging, is emerging as a choice of treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). PSH in Jehovah's witness (JW) patients, for whom transfusion is not an option, involves complex surgical and medicolegal issues. A 52-year-old JW male with synchronous, multiple, bilobar liver metastases from a rectal adenocarcinoma was referred following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. At surgery, 10 metastatic deposits were observed and confirmed by intraoperative ultrasonography. Parenchymal-sparing non-anatomical resections were performed using a cavitron ultrasonic aspirator with the application of intermittent Pringle maneuvres. Histology confirmed multiple CRLMs with tumor-free resection margins. PSH is increasingly employed for CRLMs to preserve residual liver volume and minimize morbidity without compromising oncological outcomes. It is technically challenging, especially in the presence of bilobar, multi-segmental disease. This case illustrates the feasibility of performing complex hepatic surgery in special patient groups by meticulous planning and preparation involving multiple specialties and the patient.
RESUMEN
Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH) for lesions with proximity to major vessels (PMV) in posterosuperior segments (PSS) has not yet been sufficiently examined. The aim of this study is to examine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic PSH for lesions with PMV in PSS 7 and 8. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) for PSS lesions and focused on patients who underwent laparoscopic PSH for lesions with PMV in PSS. Blood loss was lower in the LLR group (n = 110) than the OLR group (n = 16) (p = 0.009), and no other short-term outcomes were significantly different. Compared to the pure LLR group (n = 93), there were no positive surgical margins or complications in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) (n = 17), despite more tumors with PMV (p = 0.009). Regarding pure LLR for one tumor lesion, any short-term outcomes in addition to the operative time were not significantly different between the PMV (n = 23) and no-PMV (n = 48) groups. The present findings indicate that laparoscopic PSH for lesions with PMV in PSS is safe and feasible in a matured team, and the HALS technique still plays an important role.
RESUMEN
Background: Primary tracheal or bronchial tumors are relatively uncommon, whether benign or malignant. Sleeve resection is an excellent surgical technique for most primary tracheal or bronchial tumors. However, depending on the size and location of the tumor, thoracoscopic wedge resection of trachea or bronchus can be performed with the assistance of a fiberoptic bronchoscope for some malignant and benign tumors. Case Description: We performed a single incision video-assisted bronchial wedge resection in a patient with a left main bronchial hamartoma with a size of 7 × 5 × 5â mm. The patient was discharged from the hospital six days after the surgery with no postoperative complications. There was no obvious discomfort during the 6-month postoperative follow-up, and the reexamination of fiberoptic bronchoscopy revealed no evident stenosis of the incision. Conclusions: Through the detailed case study and literature review, we believe that tracheal or bronchial wedge resection is a significantly superior technique under the appropriate conditions. Video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection of trachea or bronchus should be a new and excellent development direction of minimally invasive bronchial surgery.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Primary spontaneous pneumothorax is a common disease, whose surgical treatment is still enigmatic in terms of timing and technique. Herein, we reported our experience with the parenchymal-sparing technique via cold coagulation (CC), in comparison to stapler apicectomy (SA). METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of all patients with apical blebs or <2 cm bullae treated with minimally invasive surgery for recurrent or persistent spontaneous pneumothorax, from 2010 to 2020. Two different surgical techniques were used: SA and the parenchymal-sparing CC of the apex. Perioperative and long-term results were analysed and compared. RESULTS: Out of 177 patients enrolled, 77 patients (CC group) underwent cold-coagulation of the apex while 100 patients (SA group) were treated with SA. Two groups were comparable in terms of age, surgical indication, intraoperative findings and affected side. CC group had a mean operative time of 43.2 min (standard deviation ± 19.5), shorter than SA group with 49.3 min (standard deviation ± 20.1, P-value: 0.050). Complication rate was significantly different between 2 groups, 5 (7%) and 16 (16%), for the CC and SA groups, respectively (P: 0.048), even if not in terms of prolonged postoperative air leak (P: 0.16). During the follow-up, 13 homolateral recurrences were reported: 2 (3%) in group CC and 11 (11%) in group SA; with a significant difference (P: 0.044). All reinterventions (postoperative prolonged air leak and recurrences) required an SA. CONCLUSIONS: Parenchymal-sparing technique through CC of apical blebs and bullae is an effective treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax and guarantees a good immediate lung sealing, despite stapling still represents the choice treatment in complex cases.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) provides the best opportunity for prolonged survival. Eligibility for metastasectomy has expanded with technical advancements including parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH). Meanwhile, enthusiasm for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has increased, though this approach may be preferentially utilized for technically straightforward cases. The purpose of this study is to characterize modern trends in open versus MIS approaches to partial hepatectomy and anatomic hepatectomy for CRLM within a nationwide cohort. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was used to investigate trends in MIS versus open hepatectomy for CRLM from 2015 to 2019. We examined baseline clinicopathologic and disease-related characteristics and compared trends in treatments over the study period. RESULTS: A total of 7457 patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM were identified (1367 MIS, 6090 open). Patients had similar clinicopathologic features between the two groups. Patients undergoing MIS resection less frequently received neoadjuvant therapy (51.1% vs 64.0%, p < 0.001) or concurrent intraoperative ablation (15.0% vs 21.3%, p < 0.001). Patients with tumors < 2 cm (34.9% vs 26.8%, p < 0.001) or only one to two tumors (82.8% vs 65.0%, p < 0.001) more commonly underwent MIS. MIS and open partial hepatectomies both significantly increased over the study period, but open partial hepatectomy increased at a greater rate than MIS (p < 0.001). Rates of anatomic resections have remained the same, with a greater proportion performed using an open approach (34.9% vs 16.4%, p < 0.001). Rates of operations consisting of > 1 concurrent partial hepatectomy are stable, but significantly more likely to be performed open (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy for CRLM has increased from a rise in partial hepatectomy, potentially translating to increased use of PSH. Current trends suggest MIS approaches appear to be increasing, but selectively implemented for patients with less technically demanding disease characteristics. Educational efforts should be directed towards increased dissemination of parenchymal-sparing MIS techniques for more complex resections.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreatic enucleation by the open approach (OpenEN) are well known. However, ENs are more frequently performed laparoscopically (LapEN). The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors of POPF following LapEN. METHODS AND PATIENTS: All patients in our prospective database who underwent LapEN were evaluated. We report the demographics, surgical, early and long-term outcomes. Numerous variables were analyzed to identify the risk factors of POPF. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2020, 650 laparoscopic pancreatic resections were performed including 64 EN (10%). The median age was 51 years old (17-79), median BMI was 24 (19-48), and 44 patients were women (69%). The main presentation was an incidental diagnosis (n = 40; 62%), pain (n= 10;16%), and hypoglycemia (n = 8;12%). The main indications were neuroendocrine tumors (40; 63%), mucinous cystadenomas (15; 23%), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasie (3; 5%), and other benign cysts (6; 9%). Lesions were located on the distal pancreas (43; 67%), head (n = 17; 27%), and neck (4; 6%). The median size was 20 mm (9-110); 30 mm (20-110) for mucinous cystadenoma and 18 mm (8-33) for NET. The median operative time was 90 mn (30-330), median blood loss was 20 ml (0-800) ml, and there were no transfusions and one conversion. There were no mortalities and overall morbidity (n = 22; 34%) included grades B and C POPF (10;16%) and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (4; 6%). The median hospital stay was 7 days (3-42). There were no invaded lymph nodes and all cystic lesions were nonmalignant. After a mean follow-up of 24 months, there was no recurrence. The risk factors for grades B/C POPF were mucinous cystadenoma and proximity to the Wirsung duct < 3 mm. CONCLUSION: In this series, the outcome of LapEN was excellent with no mortality and a low rate of morbidity. However, the risk of POPF is increased with cystic lesions and those close to the Wirsung duct.
Asunto(s)
Cistoadenoma Mucinoso , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Fístula Pancreática/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Cistoadenoma Mucinoso/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Conductos Pancreáticos/cirugía , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer diagnosis in the world, and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite significant progress in management strategies for colorectal cancer over the last several decades, metastatic disease remains difficult to treat and is often considered incurable. However, for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), surgical resection offers the best opportunity for survival, can be curative, and remains the gold standard. Unfortunately, surgical treatment options are underutilized. Misperceptions regarding resectable and unresectable CRLM likely play a role in this. The assessment of factors that impact resectability status like medical fitness, technical considerations, and disease biology can be difficult, necessitating careful multidisciplinary input and discussion. The identification of ideal operative time windows that align with the multimodal management of these patients can also be perplexing. For all patients with CRLM it may therefore be advantageous to obtain surgical evaluation at the time of discovering liver metastases to mitigate these challenges and minimize the risk of undertreatment. In this review we summarize current surgical management strategies for CRLM and discuss factors to be considered when determining resectability.
RESUMEN
We describe a case of complex parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases. A 66-years-old male, who previously received a diagnosis of a stenosing adenocarcinoma of the hepatic flexure and synchronous bilobar liver metastases, was referred to our hospital. At the time of the presentation of the disease, a contrast-enhanced CT scan showed 24 liver lesions, with a bilobar distribution and two major cluster of lesions in segment 6 and 7. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, global partial response, with complete response for most lesions, was detected: seven lesions were visible after re-staging. Surgical strategy was planned by means of three-dimensional reconstruction and simulation software. A unique transection plane comprising partial resection of segments 2, 3, 4, 5 and 8 and complete resection of segments 6 and 7 was performed. Left, middle and right hepatic veins were exposed on the cut surface. Accurate preoperative planning and intraoperative ultrasound for resection guidance allowed us to follow complex transection planes and treat a patient with a high burden of bilobar deeply located disease in a parenchymal-sparing perspective.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Hepatectomía/métodos , Venas Hepáticas/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
Background: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS) has evolved as a treatment strategy for patients with liver tumors who are not amenable for upfront hepatectomy because of an insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Aim of this study was to test the applicability of ultrasound guided parenchyma sparing surgery to ALPPS concept, by non-anatomically shifting the plane of transection in favor of FLR, resulting in a new technical variant of ALPPS, entitled parenchyma sparing ALPPS (psALPPS). Materials and Methods: Patients who could not safely undergo right trisectionectomy ALPPS because of insufficient FLR were considered eligible for psALPPS, consisting in liver partition through segment 4 using ultrasound guidance. Results: Between April 2017 and April 2021, five patients with median age of 68 years (range: 66-78), four male and one female, underwent psALPPS for colorectal liver metastases (N=2), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (N=2), and hepatocellular carcinoma (N=1). Standardized FLR (sFLR) for segments 2-3 before stage 1 surgery would have been a median of 11.6%. PsALPPS could double the sFLR at stage 1 resulting in an increase of ps-sFLR from a median of 22.7% (at stage 1) to 34.0% (at stage 2) after a median interstage interval of 15 days. All patients tolerated surgery well and no major complications were recorded. Conclusions: Applying the principles of parenchyma sparing surgery to ALPPS offers the advantage to maximize FLR and simultaneously reduce ischemic injury of segment 4 compared to conventional ALPPS. In this way, psALPPS may markedly increase resectability while reducing morbidity. Video: https://www.revistachirurgia.ro/pdfs/?EntryID=922974&art=2021-parenchyma-sparing-ALPPS-ultrasound-guided-partition.pdf
Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Anciano , Femenino , Hepatectomía/métodos , Humanos , Ligadura/métodos , Hígado/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Porta/patología , Vena Porta/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) of bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are challenging and the safety and long-term outcomes are unclear. In this study, the short- and long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of one-stage LLR for bilobar CRLM were compared to single laparoscopic resection for CRLM. METHODS: This single-center study consisted of all patients who underwent a parenchymal sparing LLR for CRLM between October 2011 and December 2018. Demographics, perioperative outcomes, short-term outcomes, oncologic outcomes and recurrence patterns were compared. Data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: Thirty six patients underwent a LLR for bilobar CRLM and ninety patients underwent a single LLR. Demographics were similar among groups. More patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the bilobar group (55.6% vs 34.4%, P = 0.03). There was no difference in conversion rate, R0 resection and transfusion rate. Blood loss and operative time were higher in the bilobar group (250 ml (IQR 150-450) vs 100 ml (IQR 50-250), P < 0.001 and 200 min (IQR 170-230) vs 130 min (IQR 100-165), P < 0.001) and hospital stay was longer (5 days (IQR 4-7) vs 4 days (IQR 3-6), P = 0.015). The bilobar group had more technically major resections (88.9% vs 56.7%, P < 0.001). Mortality was nil in both groups and major morbidity was similar (2.8% vs 3.3%, P = 1.0). There was no difference in recurrence pattern. Overall survival (OS) was similar (1 yr: 96% in both groups and 5 yr 76% vs 66%, P = 0.49), as was recurrence-free survival (RFS) (1 yr: 64% vs 73%, 3 yr: 38 vs 42%, 5 yr: 38% vs 28%, P = 0.62). CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, LLR for bilobar CRLM can be performed safely with similar oncologic outcomes as patients who underwent a single LLR for CRLM.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Modern chemotherapy and repeat hepatectomy allow to tailor the surgical strategies for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study addresses the hypothesis that parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy reduces postoperative complications while ensuring similar oncologic outcomes compared to the standardized non-parenchymal-sparing procedures. METHODS: Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM between 2012 and 2019 at a hepatobiliary center in Switzerland were assessed. Patients were stratified according to the tumor burden score [TBS2 = (maximum tumor diameter in cm)2 + (number of lesions)2)] and were dichotomized in a lower and a higher tumor burden cohort according to the median TBS. Postoperative outcomes, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients following parenchymal-sparing resection (PSR) for CRLM were compared with those of patients undergoing non-PSR. RESULTS: During the study period, 153 patients underwent liver resection for CRLM with curative intent. PSR was performed in 79 patients with TBS <4.5, and in 42 patients with TBS ≥4.5. Perioperative chemotherapy was administered in equal rates in both groups (PSR vs. non-PSR) both in TBS ≥4.5 and TBS <4.5. In patients with lower tumor burden (TBS <4.5), PSR was associated with lower overall complication rate (15.2% vs. 46.2%, p = 0.009), a trend for lower major complication rate (8.9% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.123), and shorter length of hospital stay (5 vs. 9 days, p = 0.006) in comparison to non-PSR. For TBS <4.5, PSR resulted in equivalent 5-year OS (48% vs. 39%, p = 0.479) and equivalent 5-year RFS rates (44% vs. 29%, p = 0.184) compared to non-PSR. For TBS ≥4.5, PSR resulted in lower postoperative complication rate (33.3% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.031), a trend for lower major complication rate (23.8% vs. 42.2%, p = 0.150), lower length of hospital stay (6 vs. 9 days, p = 0.005), equivalent 5-year OS (29% vs. 22%, p = 0.314), and equivalent 5-year RFS rates (29% vs. 18%, p = 0.156) compared to non-PSR. Among all patients treated with PSR, patients undergoing minimal-invasive hepatectomy had equivalent 5-year OS (42% vs. 37%, p = 0.261) and equivalent 5-year RFS (34% vs. 34%, p = 0.613) rates compared to patients undergoing open hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: PSR for CRLM is associated with lower postoperative morbidity, shorter length of hospital stay, and equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to non-PSR, independently of tumor burden. Our findings suggest that minimal-invasive PSR should be considered as the preferred method for the treatment of curatively resectable CRLM, if allowed by tumor size and location.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/mortalidad , Tejido Parenquimatoso/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Tejido Parenquimatoso/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Suiza/epidemiología , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) for diffusely spreading bile duct cancer (DSBDC) usually involves a major hepatectomy and a concomitant pancreatoduodenectomy, and is still challenging surgery because of postoperative liver failure. The present case report demonstrated two cases of DSBDC where we could achieve successful HPD with central liver resection (CHPD) as liver parenchymal sparing surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: In Case 1, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with multiple biopsies revealed that she had DSBDC with Bismuth-Corlette type IIIA. 3D integrated images reconstructed by contrast enhanced CT and CT with drip infusion cholecystocholangiography data revealed the right antero-ventral bile duct (RAVD) confluent to the right hepatic duct and the right antero-dorsal bile duct (RADD) independently confluent to the right posterior bile duct (RPD). Tumor extended common bile duct including intrapancreatic bile duct to the left hepatic duct and RAVD, but the RADD and RPD were spared. Because the future liver remnant (FLR) was assumed not to achieve desirable volume by preoperative portal vein embolization for left or right trisegmentectomy, CHPD including resection of the segments IV and I, and the right antero-ventral segment was done and achieved R0. This procedure is tailored to the anatomical extent of disease in the context of variable biliary anatomy as a modified CHPD, and to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of modified CHPD with antero-dorsal segment preservation. In Case 2, preoperative imaging revealed DSBDC with Bismuth Corlette type IIIA. FLR volume was assumed insufficient for major hepatectomy, CHPD including resection of the segments IV and I, and the right anterior sector was done with R0. The remnant liver volumes of these cases were spared by 55.1% and 25% respectively, and postoperative course was uneventful in both. CONCLUSION: CHPD should be considered a valid option for well-selected cases of DSBDC. This is the first case report of modified CHPD with antero-dorsal segment preservation.