RESUMEN

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is the sudden onset of decreased blood supply to the extremities and carries a poor prognosis for the affected limb and survival. A rare but well-recognized embolic etiology is a paradoxical embolism, the translocation of a thrombus from venous to arterial circulation through an intracardiac communication, most commonly a patent foramen ovale. The presentation of ALI secondary to a PFO-mediated paradoxical embolism is most often accompanied by combinations of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and an acute cerebral or visceral ischemia. We present the first documented case of a Rutherford class I ALI secondary to a PFO-mediated paradoxical embolism, ipsilateral DVT, and PE in a 29-year-old female who was surgically managed for her disabling claudication rather than limb salvage. The overlapping presentation of a viable ALI and ipsilateral DVT created a challenging clinical diagnosis. Our review of the literature on PFO-mediated paradoxical emboli involved 43 reports including 51 patients with various arterial thromboses; 19 of these cases involved lower extremity ALI. This case report is the first case to date that demonstrates a paradoxical embolism causing acute lower extremity ischemia with ipsilateral DVT and no additional limb/visceral ischemia to suggest the diagnosis of ALI. We also highlight the role that quality of life plays in vascular surgical decision-making, extending ALI management goals to not only reducing mortality and major amputations, but also improving quality of life.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score was developed to identify stroke-related patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with cryptogenic stroke. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2016 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample to determine the performance of the modified RoPE score in identifying the presence of a PFO in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). RESULTS: A total of 3,338,805 hospital admissions for AIS were analysed and 3.0% had PFO. Patients with PFO were younger compared to those without a PFO (median 63 years vs. 71 years, p < 0.001) and fewer were female (46.1% vs. 49.7%, p < 0.001). The patients with PFO had greater mean modified RoPE scores (4.0 vs. 3.3, p < 0.001). The area under the curve for the RoPE score in predicting PFOs was 0.625 (95%CI 0.620-0.629). The best diagnostic power of the RoPE score was achieved with a cut-off point of ≥4 where the sensitivity was 55% and the specificity was 64.2%. A cut-off point of ≥5 increased the specificity (83.1%) at the expense of sensitivity (35.8%). The strongest predictor of PFOs was deep vein thrombosis (OR 3.97, 95%CI 3.76-4.20). CONCLUSIONS: The modified RoPE score had modest predictive value in identifying patients with PFO among patients admitted with AIS.

RESUMEN

A 67-year-old woman with pulmonary hypertension (PH) presented with a 1-day history of worsening shortness of breath and pleuritic chest pain and was found to have a troponin T level of 3755 ng/L (ref. range 0-19 ng/L). An initial diagnostic workup in the emergency department (ED) led to an urgent left heart catheterization which revealed a 90% occlusive right coronary artery blood clot, even though a recent heart catheterization less than a month prior was completely unremarkable. Further workup led to the discovery of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and an aneurysmal interatrial septum, suggesting the presence of a paradoxical embolism. While typically asymptomatic, a PFO is an important clinical entity that can lead to irreversible cardiac damage. Suspicion should be high for this finding in the case of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) with no clear cause, especially in a patient with elevated right heart pressures.

RESUMEN

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) carries a high risk of paradoxical embolism. This risk is higher in certain conditions, including acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Although most patients with a PFO are asymptomatic, various clinical manifestations may be associated with PFO. Concomitant APE and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to paradoxical embolism from a PFO are rare. We report a case of a 61-year-old man who presented with simultaneous PE and AIS in the presence of PFO, was treated successfully with anticoagulation, and was discharged from the hospital neurologically intact.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although rare, paradoxical embolism sometimes occurs with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). This study presents a case of PDA-associated paradoxical embolism with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and pulmonary embolism (PE) following thoracoscopic surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old woman developed acute-onset aphasia and right hemiparesis on the third day following thoracoscopic resection for a right lung tumor. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple infarcts, and lower extremity venous Doppler ultrasound revealed deep vein thrombosis. The patient subsequently developed dyspnea, tachycardia, and hypoxemia. PE was confirmed by percutaneous transfemoral venous selective pulmonary angiography, which meanwhile demonstrated a PDA lesion. The patient, after receiving catheter-directed thrombolysis and inferior vena cava filter placement, improved in both neurological and respiratory status. CONCLUSION: For an uncommon but potentially fatal case with PDA-induced paradoxical embolism causing AIS and PE, early recognition and treatment are vital. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal management and prognosis of patients with PDA-related embolic events.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: While cerebral infarction in children is rare, its prognosis is poor, and this condition can seriously burden society and families. A correlation between patent foramen ovale (PFO) and ischemic stroke has not been found in pediatric patients. Case presentation: We report a 7-year-old boy who suffered from multiple cerebral infarctions. Subsequently, the patient was diagnosed with an abnormal shunt of PFO. He underwent PFO closure and was followed up for 1 year. The patient did not experience any further cerebral infarction. Conclusions: With this case report, we want to illustrate that although the incidence rate of ischemic cerebral infarction in adolescents is very low, we should not neglect the role of PFO. Therefore, after exclusion other causes of cerebral infarction, PFO should be considered in adolescent and adult stroke patients with adult closure criteria in the same way.

RESUMEN

At present, the patent foramen ovale (PFO) does not receive the deserved medical attention. The PFO poses a serious threat to health and even the life of mankind. The first respective case report in the medical literature dates back to the 19th century. It led to death. The fact that a PFO is present in roughly 25% of people underscores its overall potential to cause harm. Yet at the same time, the sheer number discourages the medical community from screening for it and from treating it. About 5% of the population have particularly dangerous forms of PFOs. Such PFOs portray a high enough risk for clinical events, the likes of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or ocular, visceral, and peripheral embolism, to justify screening for them. Highly significant health incidents being at stake, it appears obvious that PFO closure should be used for primary prevention. This is supported by the fact that closing a PFO is the simplest intervention in cardiology, with presumably the highest clinical yield. Being mainly a preventive measure, PFO closure represents a mechanical vaccination. When closing PFOs for one of the rarer therapeutic indications (migraine, platypnea orthodeoxia, etc.), patients automatically profit from the collateral benefit of getting, at the same time, mechanically vaccinated for life against paradoxical embolism. Vice versa, closing a PFO for the prevention of paradoxical embolism betters or cures migraine or exercise dyspnea not infrequently, thereby improving quality of life as a collateral benefit.

RESUMEN

Objective: Paradoxical embolism from right-to-left shunting is a common cause of cryptogenic stroke in the young. Circulatory ischemia of the cochlea is closely connected with severe-to-profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss. This study aimed to explore the role of paradoxical embolism in severe-to-profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss in juveniles and young adults. Methods: From August 2021 to September 2022, consecutive outpatients under 35 years of age with severe-to-profound sudden hearing loss were included in the study. Routine auditory electrophysiological testing and contrast transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (c-TCD) were conducted, and the results were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Seven patients (age: 19.4 ± 6.5 years) were enrolled, including 5 juveniles and 2 young adults. Three patients had severe deafness, and 4 patients had profound deafness. Right-to-left shunting was detected in all patients through c-TCD. Patent foramen ovale was found in 2 patients while pulmonary arteriovenous fistula was found in 1 patient through contrast transthoracic echocardiography or cardiac catheterization. No patients had precipitating factors for sudden sensorineural hearing loss, and none had abnormalities on head magnetic resonance imaging. Six patients underwent whole-exome sequencing, and no known deafness gene variant was detected. After standard treatment for 1 month, 2, 3, and 2 patients had complete, slight, and no hearing recovery, respectively. Conclusions: Paradoxical embolism is a possible cause of severe-to-profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss in juveniles and young adults. In young patients, c-TCD is an effective screening tool to detect right-to-left shunting, while contrast transthoracic echocardiography is a complementary examination to c-TCD.

RESUMEN

Ebstein's anomaly (EA), a congenital cardiac anomaly, is characterized by apical displacement of the tricuspid valve leaflet(s) into the right ventricle. We present the case of a 61-year-old female with a history of EA, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and patent foramen ovale (PFO), who presented with worsening hypoxia and confusion, in the setting of left lower extremity cellulitis and abscess. The computed tomography (CT) scan of the head showed a cerebellar infarct with hemorrhagic conversion. Magnetic resonance imaging of the head showed a satellite lesion raising concern for the embolic nature of infarcts. After ruling out cardioembolic causes of cerebellar infarction, her presenting symptoms were attributed to paradoxical septic emboli from the left leg abscess (demonstrated on CT scan of the leg). She was deemed a poor candidate for surgical closure of PFO due to contraindication to use heparin (due to the presence of hemorrhagic stroke) and underlying comorbidities. Septic embolization is a rare but dreaded complication in EA patients with PFO. Learning objective: •Paradoxical emboli can occur in patients with Ebstein's anomaly (EA) and patent foramen ovale (PFO).•The mainstay of management in case of paradoxical embolism lies with the identification and treatment of the underlying cause, such as infective endocarditis, deep vein thrombosis, or infectious source, as in the present case.•The surgical correction of PFO in EA patients should be considered when the patient becomes symptomatic with cyanosis, hypoxia, or manifestations of paradoxical emboli.

RESUMEN

Paradoxical embolism due to an isolated pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM) is a rare cause of ischemic stroke. PAVMs are abnormal high-flow connections between pulmonary arteries and veins, diverting deoxygenated blood into the systemic circulation and they represent a less common source of paradoxical embolisms, especially in young individuals. Endovascular embolization is the preferred treatment for clinically significant PAVMs. We present the case of a 34-year-old woman with a left thalamic ischemic stroke. Severe contrast passage was detected in cerebral arteries through transcranial Doppler. Intracardiac ultrasound did not reveal a patent foramen ovale, prompting further investigation with pulmonary CT angiography, confirming the presence of PAVM. The patient underwent successful endovascular treatment. It is essential to consider PAVM in the etiological diagnosis of ischemic stroke, especially in young patients with signs of abnormal right-to-left communication. Periodic follow-up imaging is recommended to assess potential recurrence or changes in PAVM, emphasizing the importance of appropriate management of these malformations.

La embolia paradojal debido a una malformación arteriovenosa pulmonar (MAVP) aislada es una causa infrecuente de accidente cerebrovascular (ACV) isquémico. Las MAVP son conductos anómalos de alta circulación entre arterias y venas pulmonares, desviando sangre desoxigenada hacia la circulación sistémica y representan una fuente menos común de embolias paradojales, especialmente en personas jóvenes. La embolización endovascular es el tratamiento preferido para MAVP clínicamente significativas. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 34 años con ACV isquémico talámico izquierdo. Se detectó pasaje de burbujas "en cortina" en arterias cerebrales mediante Doppler transcraneal. En ecografía intracardíaca no se encontró foramen oval permeable, motivo por el cual se avanzó con realización de angiotomografía pulmonar, la cual confirmó la presencia de MAVP. La paciente recibió tratamiento endovascular exitoso. Es esencial considerar la MAVP en el diagnóstico etiológico del ACV isquémico, especialmente en pacientes jóvenes con signos de comunicación anormal de derecha a izquierda. Se recomienda un seguimiento periódico mediante imágenes para evaluar la posible recurrencia o cambios en la MAVP, resaltando la importancia del manejo adecuado de estas malformaciones.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introducción. La embolia paradójica es un evento trombótico originado en la circulación venosa, que se manifiesta como embolismo arterial por medio de un defecto anatómico a nivel cardíaco o pulmonar. Se asocia principalmente a eventos cerebrovasculares, aunque se han encontrado casos de infarto agudo de miocardio, infarto renal y otros eventos isquémicos. Caso clínico. Paciente de 47 años, quien consultó por cuadro de dolor abdominal, que requirió manejo quirúrgico de urgencia, donde identificaron isquemia intestinal importante. Los estudios adicionales hallaron déficit de proteína S y persistencia de foramen oval permeable. Resultados. La presencia de trombosis arterial se conoce como trombosis de sitios inusuales y requiere de estudios para descartar trombofilias asociadas u otros estados protrombóticos. El déficit de proteína S es una trombofilia infrecuente, la cual se asocia en la vida adulta a eventos trombóticos de origen venoso. En presencia de defectos anatómicos, como un foramen oval permeable, puede progresar a embolia arterial, configurando un cuadro de embolismo paradójico. La estratificación de estos pacientes requiere imágenes que demuestran el defecto mencionado, así como el posible origen de los émbolos. El manejo se basa en anticoagulación plena, manejo de soporte, resolver las manifestaciones trombóticas existentes y un cierre temprano del defecto anatómico. Conclusiones. El embolismo paradójico debe sospecharse en caso de trombosis de sitios inusuales. Requiere de un estudio exhaustivo con imágenes y su manejo debe basarse en anticoagulación y cierre del defecto.

Introduction. Paradoxical embolism is a thrombotic event originating in the venous circulation, which manifests as arterial embolism through an anatomical cardiac or pulmonary defect. It is mainly associated with stroke, also presenting as acute myocardial infarction, renal infarction, and other ischemic events. Clinical case. A 47-year-old patient was admitted due to abdominal pain, which required emergency surgical management, finding significant intestinal ischemia. Additional studies found protein S deficiency and evidence of a patent foramen ovale. Discussion. Arterial thrombosis is known as unusual thrombosis; this situation requires to rule out associated thrombophilia or other prothrombotic diseases. Protein S deficiency is a rare thrombophilia, which in adults causes venous thrombosis. In the presence of anatomical defects, such as a patent foramen ovale, it can progress to arterial embolism, presenting a picture of paradoxical embolism. The study work of these patients requires imaging that demonstrates the aforementioned defect, as well as the possible origin of the emboli. Management is based on full anticoagulation, treatment of existing thrombotic manifestations, and management of the anatomical defect. Conclusions. Paradoxical embolism should be suspected in case of unusual thrombosis. It requires exhaustive studies based on imaging, and management should consist of anticoagulation and closure of the defect.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Paradoxical embolism is a medical condition characterized by the migration of an embolus from a venous source into the systemic circulation. This occurs through a specific cardiac abnormality known as a right-to-left shunt, ultimately resulting in the possibility of arterial embolism. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common cause of intracardiac shunting. We reported a rare case of a 56-year-old man on hemodialysis with PFO and arteriovenous fistula dysfunction who suffered a paradoxical embolic ischemic stroke after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. This case emphasized the potential risk of paradoxical embolism in hemodialysis patients with vascular access problems. We aimed to highlight the importance of searching for PFO, as it may serve as a possible source of embolism in these patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Paradoxical embolism is a rare cause of acute arterial occlusion. This phenomenon arises when embolic material travels from the venous system crosses an abnormal shunt such as patent foramen ovale, atrial septal defects, ventricular septal defects, or pulmonary arteriovenous malformations, into the arterial system. Impending paradoxical embolism refers to the presence of an entrapped thrombus in the patent foramen ovale. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 68-year-old female patient who presented with an impending paradoxical embolism, alongside both concomitant pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. Swiftly addressed through emergency cardiac surgery and systemic anticoagulation, the patient's condition was effectively treated. CONCLUSIONS: While the ideal treatment strategy for impending paradoxical embolism remains a topic of debate due to limited and inconclusive evidence, emergent open surgery should be contemplated in patients as it signifies a critical clinical emergency.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Over 750,000 individuals suffer from stroke annually in the United States, with 87% of these strokes being ischemic in nature. Roughly 40% of ischemic strokes occur in individuals 60 years of age or under. A quarter of all ischemic strokes have no identifiable cause despite extensive workup and are deemed cryptogenic in nature. Patent Foramen Ovales (PFO) has been postulated in stroke causation by either paradoxical embolization or platelet activation in the tunnel of the defect. The incidence of PFO is reported to be 15-25% in the general population but rises to 40% in patients with cryptogenic stroke. While the initial trials evaluating PFO closures were non-revealing, subsequent long-term follow-ups, as well as recent trials evaluating PFO closures in cryptogenic stroke patients 60 years of age or under, demonstrated the superiority of percutaneous closure compared to medical therapy alone, leading to FDA approval of PFO closure devices. In this review, we review the diagnosis of PFO, postulated stroke mechanisms, literature supporting PFO closure, patient selection for percutaneous closure, procedural considerations, and associated procedural complications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Paradoxical embolism from right-to-left shunt through atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a well-accepted cause of "cryptogenic" strokes (CS). To better understand the pathogenic role of ASD, we compared ASD patients with CS having a high and low likelihood of being PFO-related. METHODS: In the Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne, we calculated prevalence of PFO and ASD in CS patients undergoing echocardiography, and calculated odds ratios (OR) when compared to non-CS. Using the Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score, we divided CS PFO patients in high (HL-PFO, RoPE 8-10) and low-likelihood (LL-PFO, RoPE 0-4) PFO-related stroke. We then performed univariate comparison of epidemiological, clinical and radiological variables of ASD patients with both PFO groups. RESULTS: Among all CS, prevalence of ASD and PFO were 1.3% and 36.8% respectively. When compared to non-CS, ASD and PFO were associated with CS (OR of 5.2, CI= 1.6-16.6, and 2.8, CI= 2.1-3.8). Compared with HL-PFO, ASD patients were older, more often female, had more cardiovascular risk factors and silent strokes. Compared with LL-PFO, ASD patients were younger, more often female, and had less risk factors. No differences were found for clinical and radiological characteristics and clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: ASD is a rare stroke risk factor for CS. Since characteristics of such patients lie in-between high and low-likelihood paradoxical PFO-strokes, a thorough work-up for other stroke mechanisms is warranted. Individual evaluation of the likelihood of the ASD being causative for stroke may be preferable over routine ASD closure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition that presents with a spectrum of clinical symptoms ranging from asymptomatic to hemodynamic instability. The early diagnosis in the emergency department is often challenging. Although the association between patent foramen ovale (PFO) and thromboembolic events in patients with PE is well-documented, the significance of the presence of PFO in patients with PE may be underrecognized. In addition, the occurrence of right ventricular thrombus (RVT) in PE is a rare but significant complication with implications for disease management. We report a case of acute-on-chronic PE with concurrent bilateral renal infarction due to a paradoxical embolus, alongside RVT. A 35-year-old male presented at our emergency department with complaints of sudden onset abdominal pain. Bilateral renal infarction was identified on a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Point-of-care ultrasound showed suggestive findings of PE and RVT. Subsequently, a pulmonary CT angiography confirmed bilateral PE, a PFO, and RVT. The patient was effectively managed with thrombolytic therapy, with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on standby. This case highlights the need to recognize the diverse clinical manifestations of PE and the importance of considering coexisting PFO and RVT in affected patients. The diagnosis of PE can be complex when symptoms overlap with arterial thrombosis, such as renal infarction secondary to a PFO. In addition, RVT, although uncommon, is a serious complication in patients with PE that may require careful evaluation for thrombolytic or anticoagulant therapy. It is critical to consider the possibility of a PFO in all cases of PE, even in the absence of arterial embolism, and to promptly evaluate for RVT prior to initiating treatment.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To date, this is the first case of a paradoxical embolism (PDE) that concurrently manifested in the coronary and lower limb arteries and was secondary to a central venous catheter (CVC) thrombus via a patent foramen ovale (PFO). CASE SUMMARY: Here, we report a case of simultaneous coronary and lower limb artery embolism in a PFO patient carrier of a CVC. The patient presented to the hospital with acute chest pain and lower limb fatigue. Doppler ultrasound showed a large thrombus in the right internal jugular vein, precisely at the tip of the CVC. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography confirmed the existence of a PFO, with inducible right-to-left shunting by the Valsalva maneuver. The patient was administered an extended course of anticoagulation therapy, and then the CVC was successfully removed. Percutaneous PFO closure was not undertaken. There was no recurrence during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Thus, CVC-associated thrombosis is a potential source for multiple PDE in PFO patients.

RESUMEN

Coronary artery embolism is an uncommon cause of myocardial infarction (MI). Among several etiologies of coronary embolism, we mention a very rare cause which is the paradoxical embolism via patent foramen ovale (PFO). It interests generally youngest people without cardiac risk factors. We report three cases who presented ST-elevation MI (STEMI) due to paradoxical embolism with high risk PFO that can justify embolic infarction. The aim of this article is to define the high risk PFO, to establish causal link between PFO and embolic events and to guide therapeutic management.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To develop an imaging prediction model for patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), we investigated the association of topographic diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) patterns with potential embolic sources (PES) identified by transesophageal echocardiography. METHODS: From a total of 992 consecutive patients with embolic stroke, 366 patients with the ESUS group were selected. ESUS was defined as no atrial fibrillation (Af) within 24h from admission and no PES after general examination. Clinical variables include age (> 80years, 70-80 years), sex, vascular risk factors and left atrial diameter > 4 cm. Age, sex and vascular risk factors adjusted odds ratio of each DWI for the different PESs were calculated. DWI was determined based on the arterial territories. Middle cerebral arteries were divided into 4 segments, i.e., M1-M4. Moreover, M2 segments were subdivided into superior and inferior branches. RESULTS: The 366 patients consisted of 168 with paroxysmal Af (pAf), 77 with paradoxical embolism, 71 with aortic embolism and 50 with undetermined embolism after transesophageal echocardiography. The variables adjusted odds ratio (OR) of internal carotid artery (OR: 12.1, p = 0.037), M1 (4.2, p = 0.001), inferior M2 (7.5, p = 0.0041) and multiple cortical branches (12.6, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in patients with pAf. Striatocapsular infarction (12.5, p < 0.0001) and posterior inferior cerebellar artery infarcts (3.6, p = 0.018) were significantly associated with paradoxical embolism. Clinical variables adjusted OR of multiple small scattered infarcts (8.3, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in patients with aortic embolism. CONCLUSION: The associations of DWI with different PES have their distinctive characteristics and DWI along with clinical variables may help predict PES in patients with ESUS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A 36-year-old woman suffered from an embolic stroke of an undetermined source documented by magnetic resonance imaging with residual right arm weakness. She underwent percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure with an 18/25 mm device in another center. One year later, the patient suffered from a transient ischemic attack with dysarthria. She asked for a second opinion at our institution and a contrast-transthoracic (cTTE) /transesophageal echocardiography showed a large residual right-to-left shunt (RLS) through a still patent tunnel after PFO closure. Written informed consent for a redo procedure was obtained from the patient. A catheter-based closure of the residual shunt was therefore planned under local anesthesia and rotational intracardiac echo monitoring. A second equally sized disc (18/18 mm) device was successfully implanted without complications. The patient was discharged home the following day in good clinical condition. Dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended for the first 2 months and then single antiplatelet therapy up to 6 months. At the 6-month follow-up, the cTTE color Doppler showed the stable position of the two nitinol double-disc devices and the c-transcranial Doppler confirmed the abolition of the residual RLS.

Asunto(s)