RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In pacemaker-dependent patients, the risk of asystole must be managed during device replacement. This study aimed to examine whether we could predict the indication for temporary pacing (TP) during the generator replacement. METHODS: We studied 105 consecutive patients who underwent pacemaker replacement due to battery depletion at Juntendo Nerima Hospital between September 2005 and December 2016. We examined the relationship between the stability of the intrinsic rhythm (IR) during pacemaker replacement and several clinical factors including age, gender, sick sinus syndrome or atrioventricular (AV) block, duration of pacing, structural heart disease, use of anti-arrhythmic drugs, and the presence/absence of a stable IR (>40 bpm) at the outpatient clinic (OPC) just before pacemaker replacement. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients, we excluded 1 patient who required TP because of bradycardia-dependent torsades de points. Therefore, we evaluated 104 patients for the indication for TP. TP was underwent in 19 patients (18%) because of an absence or instability of the IR during pacemaker replacement. The indication for TP was significantly correlated with AV block (84% vs 48%, P = .0044) and the absence of a stable IR at the last OPC visit (89% vs 24%, P < .0001). For predicting the indication for TP, the following values of no stable IR at the last OPC visit were obtained: 89% sensitivity, 77% specificity, 46% positive predictive value, and 97% negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a stable IR at the last OPC visit was a good predictor (97%) of no indication for TP during pacemaker replacement.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency of electrosurgery-related pacemaker malfunction. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to investigate electrosurgery-related pacemaker malfunction in consecutive patients undergoing pulse generator (PG) replacement or upgrade from two large hospitals in Minneapolis, MN between January 2011 and January 2014. The occurrence of this pacemaker malfunction was then studied by using MAUDE database for all four major device vendors. RESULTS: A total of 1398 consecutive patients from 2 large tertiary referral centers in Minneapolis, MN undergoing PG replacement or upgrade surgery were retrospectively studied. Four patients (0.3% of all patients), all with pacemakers from St Jude Medical (2.8%, 4 of 142) had output failure or inappropriately low pacing rate below 30 bpm during electrosurgery, despite being programmed in an asynchronous mode. During the same period, 1174 cases of pacemaker malfunctions were reported on the same models in MAUDE database, 37 of which (3.2%) were electrosurgery-related. Twenty-four cases (65%) had output failure or inappropriate low pacing rate. The distribution of adverse events was loss of pacing (59.5%), reversion to backup pacing (32.4%), inappropriate low pacing rate (5.4%), and ventricular fibrillation (2.7%). The majority of these (78.5%) occurred during PG replacement at ERI or upgrade surgery. No electrosurgery-related malfunction was found in MAUDE database on 862 pacemaker malfunction cases during the same period from other vendors. CONCLUSIONS: Electrosurgery during PG replacement or upgrade surgery can trigger output failure or inappropriate low pacing rate in certain models of modern pacemakers. Cautions should be taken for pacemaker-dependent patients.