RESUMEN

Background. Previous studies has shown that conventional neurofeedback and cognitive rehabilitation can improve psychological outcomes in people with opioid use disorders. However, the effectiveness of LORETA Z-score neurofeedback (LZNFB) and attention bias modification training on quality of life and inhibitory control of these people has not been investigated yet. LZNFB targets deeper brain structures with higher precision, compared to conventional neurofeedback that typically focuses on surface EEG activity. The present study aims to compare the effect of these two methods on quality of life and response inhibition in men with opioid use disorders under methadone maintenance therapy (MMT). Methods. In this randomized controlled clinical trial with a pre-test, post-test, follow-up design, 30 men with opioid use disorders under MMT were randomly assigned into three groups of LZNFB, attention bias modification training, and control (MMT alone). The LZNFB and Cognitive Rehabilitation groups received 20 and 15 sessions of treatment, respectively. The Persian versions WHO Quality of Life-BREEF questionnaire and the Go/No-Go test were completed by the participants before, immediately after, and one month after interventions. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS v.22 software. Results. Both intervention groups showed a significant improvement in quality-of-life score and a significant reduction in response time at the post-test phase (P < .05), where LZNFB group showed more improvement in quality of life and more reduction in response inhibition. After one month, the increase in quality of life continued in both groups, while the decrease in response time continued only in the LZNFB group. Conclusion. Both LZNFB and attention bias modification training are effective in improving quality of life and response inhibition of men with OUD under MMT, however, LZNFB is more effective.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of opioid-related deaths in the United States has more than tripled over the past 7 years, with a steep increase beginning at the same time as the COVID-19 pandemic. There is an urgent need for novel treatment options that can help alleviate the individual and social effects of refractory opioid use disorder (OUD). Deep brain stimulation (DBS), an intervention that involves implanting electrodes in the brain to deliver electrical impulses, is one potential treatment. Currently in clinical trials for many psychiatric conditions, including OUD, DBS's use for psychiatric indications is not without controversy. Several studies have examined ethical issues raised by using DBS to counter treatment-resistant depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and eating disorders. In contrast, there has been limited literature regarding the use of DBS for OUD. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to gain empirical neuroethical insights into public perceptions regarding the use of DBS for OUD, specifically via the analysis of web-based comments on news media stories about the topic. METHODS: Qualitative thematic content analysis was performed on 2 Washington Post newspaper stories that described a case of DBS being used to treat OUD. A total of 292 comments were included in the analysis, 146 comments from each story, to identify predominant themes raised by commenters. RESULTS: Predominant themes raised by commenters across the 2 samples included the hopes and expectations with treatment outcomes, whether addiction is a mental health disorder, and issues related to resource allocation. Controversial comments regarding DBS as a treatment method for OUD seemingly decreased when comparing the first printed newspaper story to the second. In comparison, the number of comments relating to therapeutic need increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: The general public's perspectives on DBS as a treatment method for OUD elucidated themes via this qualitative thematic content analysis that include overarching sociopolitical issues, positions on the use of technology, and technological and scientific issues. A better understanding of the public perceptions around the use of DBS for OUD can help address misinformation and misperceptions about the use of DBS for OUD, and identify similarities and differences regarding ethical concerns when DBS is used specifically for OUD compared to other psychiatric disorders.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Most Americans now access social media platforms, including YouTube, to obtain health information. However, few studies have evaluated the quality of YouTube content related to opioid use disorder (OUD), including medications for OUD (MOUD; buprenorphine) and harm reduction resources (e.g., naloxone). The purpose of this cross-sectional analysis was to assess the quality, accuracy, and reliability of MOUD and harm reduction-related video content available on YouTube. METHODS: The study team conducted a YouTube search between June 2022 and July 2022 using key words related to MOUD and harm reduction content (e.g., "suboxone," "methadone," "Narcan"). The 5 most viewed videos from each search term were analyzed for quality (i.e., Global Quality Scale; GQS), accuracy (i.e., JAMA Benchmark Criteria), and reliability (i.e., DISCERN). Videos that were non-English, duplicate, or that did not directly mention OUD, MOUD, or harm reduction were excluded from the review (N = 6). RESULTS: YouTube videos (N = 70) were mostly produced by medical professionals (27.1 %), independent nonmedical users (21.4 %; e.g., vloggers, individuals documenting their experiences), medical organizations (17.1 %; e.g., hospitals, treatment programs), and/or media (14.3 %; e.g., news agencies). The target audience was primarily the general public (65.7 %), people who use opioids (20.0 %), and healthcare providers (10.0 %). Videos containing MOUD content (N = 64, 61.4 %) mostly focused on suboxone (25.0 %), methadone (23.4 %), Sublocade (14.1 %), and subutex/buprenorphine (14.1 %). The median quality score was 2 based on the GQS with 3 videos receiving the highest quality rating (5). Two videos were highly rated for accuracy per all three JAMA Benchmark criteria. Videos produced by nonmedical educational channels had the highest overall reliability scores on the DISCERN criteria (median 4), followed by medical professionals (median 3), and medical organizations (median 2.5). CONCLUSION: The overall quality, accuracy, and reliability of MOUD and harm reduction related content posted on YouTube is poor. The lack of evidence-based content posted on YouTube reinforces the need for public health expert involvement in disseminating guideline-based content on social media.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Methadone is a synthetic long-acting opioid that is increasingly used in the replacement therapy of opioid-addicted patients, including pregnant women. However, methadone therapy in this population poses challenges, as it induces cognitive and behavioral impairments in infants exposed to this opioid during prenatal development. In animal models, prenatal methadone exposure results in detrimental consequences to the central nervous system, such as: (i) increased neuronal apoptosis; (ii) disruption of oligodendrocyte maturation and increased apoptosis and (iii) increased microglia and astrocyte activation. However, it remains unclear whether these deleterious effects result from a direct effect of methadone on brain cells. Therefore, our goal was to uncover the impact of methadone on single brain cell types in vitro. Primary cultures of rat neurons, oligodendrocytes, microglia, and astrocytes were treated for three days with 10 µM methadone to emulate a chronic administration. Apoptotic neurons were identified by cleaved caspase-3 detection, and synaptic density was assessed by the juxtaposition of presynaptic and postsynaptic markers. Apoptosis of oligodendrocyte precursors was determined by cleaved caspase-3 detection. Oligodendrocyte myelination was assessed by immunofluorescence, while microglia and astrocyte proinflammatory activation were assessed by both immunofluorescence and RT-qPCR. Methadone treatment increased neuronal apoptosis and reduced synaptic density. Furthermore, it led to increased oligodendrocyte apoptosis and a reduction in the myelinating capacity of these cells, and promoted the proinflammatory activation of microglia and astrocytes. We showed that methadone, the most widely used drug in opioid replacement therapy for pregnant women with opioid addiction, directly impairs brain cells in vitro, highlighting the need for developing alternative therapies to address opioid addiction in this population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Hyperkatifeia describes amplified emotional and motivational withdrawal due to addiction-related sensitization of brain-stress-systems. Hyperkatifeia has been proposed as a target for addiction treatment development. However, translation of basic research in this area will require new tools designed to measure hyperkatifeia and related phenomena outside of laboratory settings.Objectives: We define a novel concept, withdrawal interference, and introduce a new tool - the Withdrawal Interference Scale (WIS) - which measures the impact of withdrawal on daily life among individuals with OUD or AUD.Methods: Described are the combined results of three separate cross-sectional studies. The structural validity, convergent validity, construct validity, trans-diagnostic (AUD/OUD) configural, metric, and scalar invariance, internal consistency, and composite reliability of WIS was tested among three independent samples of 1) treatment-seeking adults with OUD (n = 132), 2) treatment-seeking adults with AUD (n = 123), and 3) non-treatment-seeking adults with OUD (n = 140). Males numbered 218 and females were 163.Results: WIS exhibited structural validity (1 factor), convergent validity (average variance extracted .670-.676), construct validity, trans-diagnostic configural (χ2/df = 2.10), metric (Δχ2 = 5.70, p = .681), and scalar invariance (Δχ2 = 12.34, p = .338), internal consistency (α .882-928), and composite reliability (.924-.925).Conclusion: These results suggest WIS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring withdrawal-related life disruption in AUD and OUD. Further, given our findings of transdiagnostic measurement invariance, WIS scores of individuals with AUD and OUD can be meaningfully compared in future statistical analyses.

RESUMEN

Maintenance therapy with buprenorphine and methadone is the gold standard pharmacological treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Despite these compounds demonstrating substantial efficacy, a significant number of patients do not show optimal therapeutic responses. The abuse liability of these medications is also a concern. Here we used rats to explore the therapeutic potential of the new long-acting pan-opioid agonist Cebranopadol in OUD. We tested the effect of cebranopadol on heroin self-administration and yohimbine-induced reinstatement of heroin seeking. In addition, we evaluated the abuse liability potential of cebranopadol in comparison to that of heroin under fixed ratio 1 (FR1) and progressive ratio (PR) operant self-administration contingencies. Oral administration of cebranopadol (0, 25, 50 µg/kg) significantly attenuated drug self-administration independent of heroin dose (1, 7, 20, 60µg/inf). Cebranopadol also reduced the break point for heroin (20 µg/inf). Finally, pretreatment with cebranopadol significantly attenuated yohimbine-induced reinstatement of drug seeking. In abuse liability experiments under FR1 contingency, rats maintained responding for heroin (1, 7, 20, 60µg/inf) to a larger extent than cebranopadol (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 6.0µg/inf). Under PR contingency, heroin maintained responding at high levels at all except the lowest dose, while the break point (BP) for cebranopadol did not differ from that of saline. Together, these data indicate that cebranopadol is highly efficacious in attenuating opioid self-administration and stress-induced reinstatement, while having limited abuse liability properties. Overall, the data suggest clinical potential of this compound for OUD treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Opioid use disorders (OUD) and overdoses are ever-evolving public health threats that continue to grow in incidence and prevalence in the United States and abroad. Current treatments consist of opioid receptor agonists and antagonists, which are safe and effective but still suffer from some limitations. Murine and humanized monoclonal antibodies (mAb) have emerged as an alternative and complementary strategy to reverse and prevent opioid-induced respiratory depression. To explore antibody applications beyond traditional heavy-light chain mAbs, we identified and biophysically characterized a novel single-domain antibody specific for fentanyl from a camelid variable-heavy-heavy (VHH) domain phage display library. Structural data suggested that VHH binding to fentanyl was facilitated by a unique domain-swapped dimerization mechanism, which accompanied a rearrangement of complementarity-determining region loops leading to the formation of a fentanyl-binding pocket. Structure-guided mutagenesis further identified an amino acid substitution that improved the affinity and relaxed the requirement for dimerization of the VHH in fentanyl binding. Our studies demonstrate VHH engagement of an opioid and inform on how to further engineer a VHH for enhanced stability and efficacy, laying the groundwork for exploring the in vivo applications of VHH-based biologics against OUD and overdose.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: This study examined whether there is an association between opioid-related mortality and surgical procedures. Methods: A case-control study design using deceased controls compared individuals with and without opioid death and their exposure to common surgeries in the preceding 4 years. This population-based study used linked death and hospitalization databases in Canada (excluding Quebec) from January 01, 2008 to December 31, 2017. Cases of opioid death were identified and matched to 5 controls who died of other causes by age (±4 years), sex, province of death, and date of death (±1 year). Patients with HIV infection and alcohol-related deaths were excluded from the control group. Logistic regression was used to determine if there was an association between having surgery and death from an opioid-related cause by estimating the crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and the number of days of hospitalization in the previous 4 years. Results: We identified 11,865 cases and matched them with 59,345 controls. About 11.2% of cases and 12.5% of controls had surgery in the 4 years before their death, corresponding to a crude OR of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.94). After adjustment, opioid mortality was associated with surgical procedure with OR of 1.26 (95% CI: 1.17-1.36). Conclusions: After adjusting for comorbidities, patients with opioid mortality were more likely to undergo surgical intervention within 4 years before their death. Clinicians should enhance screening for opioid use and risk factors when considering postoperative opioid prescribing.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Studies have found associations between Opioid Agonist Maintenance Treatment during incarceration and reduced recidivism among recently released formerly incarcerated persons. However, the role of community-based Opioid Agonist Maintenance Treatment in reducing recidivism post-release remains less explored. This study examines whether pre-release arranged, prison-to-rehabilitation Opioid Agonist Maintenance Treatment in the community following release is associated with reduced rates and lengths of re-incarceration among justice-involved individuals with Opioid Use Disorder. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using linked records of 208 individuals with a history of Opioid Use Disorder and treatment during their incarceration. The primary predictor variable was the duration of Opioid Agonist Maintenance Treatment, with re-incarceration rates and lengths of stay after re-incarceration being the primary outcomes examined. RESULTS: Analysis showed a significant decrease in re-incarcerations and or lengths of stay in prison among those who have been re-incarcerated and have undergone Opioid Agonist Maintenance Treatment in the community for >24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining Opioid Agonist Maintenance Treatment over 24 months may reduce re-incarcerations, and may be significantly associated with a reduction in the length of prison stay for re-incarcerated individuals. The effects were consistent across the overall population and the individuals receiving the treatment. Various other unmeasured factors, including judicial discretion, individual motivation, type of offense, and employment status, could influence this association.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) are major public health problems, with rising opioid-related overdose deaths linked to increased opioid prescriptions for pain management. Novel treatment approaches for these commonly comorbid disorders are needed. Growing evidence supports a role for glial activation for both chronic pain and substance use disorders, including OUD. This review provides an overview of glial modulators as a novel treatment approach for comorbid pain and OUD. We aim to synthesize clinical studies investigating the efficacy of glial modulators in treating these comorbid disorders. We conducted a literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases in October 2023 to identify relevant clinical trials. The included studies varied in terms of patient population, study methodology and outcomes assessed, and were often limited by small sample sizes and other methodological issues. Additionally, several glial modulators have yet to be studied for chronic pain and OUD. Despite these limitations, these studies yielded positive signals that merit further investigation. Both chronic pain and OUD remain significant public health problems, with many treatment challenges. Glial modulators continue to hold promise as novel therapeutics for comorbid pain and OUD, given positive indications that they can improve pain measures, and reduce addiction-related outcomes. As our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the contributions of glial modulators to pain and addiction behaviours deepens, we will be better equipped to identify more specific therapeutic targets for chronic pain and OUD.

RESUMEN

The rise of psychedelics in contemporary medicine has sparked interest in their potential therapeutic applications. While traditionally associated with countercultural movements and recreational use, recent research has shed light on the potential benefits of psychedelics in various mental health conditions. In this review, we explore the possible role of psychedelics in the management of chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD), 2 critical areas in need of innovative treatment options. Pain control remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly for individuals with OUD and those who receive long-term opioid therapy who develop marked tolerance to opioid-induced analgesia. Despite the magnitude of this problem, there is a scarcity of controlled studies investigating pain management alternatives for these populations. Drawing from preclinical and human evidence, we highlight the potential of psychedelics to act on shared neurobiological substrates of chronic pain and OUD, potentially reversing pain- and opioid-induced neuroadaptations, such as central sensitization. We elaborate on the multifaceted dimensions of the pain experience (sensory, affective and cognitive) and their intersections that overlap with opioid-related phenomena (opioid craving and withdrawal), hypothesizing how these processes can be modulated by psychedelics. After summarizing the available clinical research, we propose mechanistic insights and methodological considerations for the design of future translational studies and clinical trials, building on a shared clinical and neurobiological understanding of chronic pain and OUD. Our intention is to provide timely perspectives that accelerate the development and exploration of novel therapeutics for chronic pain and OUD amidst the escalating opioid crisis.

RESUMEN

Integration of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder in primary care settings is an emerging health care delivery model that supports increased access to specialized care but requires primary care provider engagement. Examining the characteristics of providers who provide this service is key to informing targeted recruitment. Using administrative and supplemental data collected during license renewal, this study aimed to identify the characteristics of primary care physicians and nurse practitioners (NPs) associated with greater odds of providing MAT in their practice. A retrospective observational study was conducted using a descriptive correlational design. The analysis included 5259 physicians and 3486 NPs who renewed their licenses electronically in 2021 and specialized in primary care or psychiatry. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of physicians and NPs associated with MAT participation in their practice. Physicians had a higher odds ratio (OR) of providing MAT if they were younger than 35 years (OR = 1.334; P = .0443), practiced in a federally qualified health center (OR = 3.101, P < .0001), and offered a sliding fee scale in their practice (OR = 2.046; P < .0001). Likewise, NPs had higher odds of providing MAT if they practiced in a public or community health center (OR = 3.866; P < .0001). The results of this study highlight the personal and professional characteristics of physicians and NPs associated with higher odds of providing MAT. These findings may have implications for the recruitment and sustainability of MAT integration in primary care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite strong and growing interest in ending the ongoing opioid health crisis, there has been limited success in reducing the prevalence of opioid addiction and the number of deaths associated with opioid overdoses. Further, 1 explanation for this is that existing interventions target those who are opiate-dependent but do not prevent opioid-naïve patients from becoming addicted. OBJECTIVE: Leveraging behavioral economics at the patient level could help patients successfully use, discontinue, and dispose of their opioid medications in an acute pain setting. The primary goal of this project is to evaluate the effect of the 3 versions of the Opioid Management for You (OPY) tool on measures of opioid use relative to the standard of care by leveraging a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: A team of researchers from the Center for Learning Health System Sciences (CLHSS) at the University of Minnesota partnered with M Health Fairview to design, build, and test the 3 versions of the OPY tool: social influence, precommitment, and testimonial version. The tool is being built using the Epic Care Companion (Epic Inc) platform and interacts with the patient through their existing MyChart (Epic Systems Corporation) personal health record account, and Epic patient portal, accessed through a phone app or the MyChart website. We have demonstrated feasibility with pilot data of the social influence version of the OPY app by targeting our pilot to a specific cohort of patients undergoing upper-extremity procedures. This study will use a group sequential RCT design to test the impact of this important health system initiative. Patients who meet OPY inclusion criteria will be stratified into low, intermediate, and high risk of opiate use based on their type of surgery. RESULTS: This study is being funded and supported by the CLHSS Rapid Prospective Evaluation and Digital Technology Innovation Programs, and M Health Fairview. Support and coordination provided by CLHSS include the structure of engagement, survey development, data collection, statistical analysis, and dissemination. The project was initially started in August 2022. The pilot was launched in February 2023 and is still running, with the data last counted in August 2023. The actual RCT is planned to start by early 2024. CONCLUSIONS: Through this RCT, we will test our hypothesis that patient opioid use and diverted prescription opioid availability can both be improved by information delivery applied through a behavioral economics lens via sending nudges directly to the opioid users through their personal health record. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06124079; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06124079. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/52882.

RESUMEN

Various studies showed that people with substance use disorder use cannabis to reduce withdrawal or dose of their main drug. Using a questionnaire about their cannabis use, 118 participants in an opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) in Germany were examined regarding this strategy. 60% reported to use cannabis. Of those, 72% were using cannabis in the suggested way. Cannabis was used to substitute for, e.g., heroin (44.8%) and benzodiazepines (16.4%). We also asked for an estimation of how good cannabis was able to substitute for several substances (in German school grades (1 till 6)); heroin average grade: 2.6 ± 1.49. Besides that we asked about the idea of cannabis as "self-medication", e.g., to reduce pain (47%) and about negative consequences from cannabis use. Our results suggest to consider the use of cannabis by patients in OMT rather as a harm reduction strategy to reduce the intake of more dangerous drugs.

RESUMEN

Background: Discovery of modifiable factors influencing subjective withdrawal experience might advance opioid use disorder (OUD) research and precision treatment. This study explores one factor - withdrawal catastrophizing - a negative cognitive and emotional orientation toward withdrawal characterized by excessive fear, worry or inability to divert attention from withdrawal symptoms.Objectives: We define a novel concept - withdrawal catastrophizing - and present an initial evaluation of the Withdrawal Catastrophizing Scale (WCS).Methods: Prospective observational study (n = 122, 48.7% women). Factor structure (exploratory factor analysis) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α) were assessed. Predictive validity was tested via correlation between WCS and next-day subjective opiate withdrawal scale (SOWS) severity. The clinical salience of WCS was evaluated by correlation between WCS and withdrawal-motivated behaviors including risk taking, OUD maintenance, OUD treatment delay, history of leaving the hospital against medical advice and buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal.Results: WCS was found to have a two-factor structure (distortion and despair), strong internal consistency (α = .901), and predictive validity - Greater withdrawal catastrophizing was associated with next-day SOWS (rs (99) = 0.237, p = .017). Withdrawal catastrophizing was also correlated with risk-taking behavior to relieve withdrawal (rs (119) = 0.357, p < .001); withdrawal-motivated OUD treatment avoidance (rs (119) = 0.421, p < .001), history of leaving the hospital against medical advice (rs (119) = 0.373, p < .001) and buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal (rs (119) = 0.369, p < .001).Conclusion: This study provides first evidence of withdrawal catastrophizing as a clinically important phenomenon with implications for the future study and treatment of OUD.

RESUMEN

Background: Previous studies have shown that conventional neurofeedback (NFB) and cognitive rehabilitation can improve psychological outcomes in people with opioid use disorders (OUDs). However, the effectiveness of Low-Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) Z-score neurofeedback (LZNFB) and attention bias modification training (ABMT) on depression and anxiety of these people has not been investigated yet. The present study aims to compare the effect of these two methods on depression and anxiety of men with OUD under methadone maintenance therapy (MMT). Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial with a pre-test, post-test, and follow-up design, 30 men with OUD under MMT were randomly assigned into three groups of LZNFB, ABMT, and control (MMT alone). The LZNFB group underwent LZNFB at 20 sessions. The ABMT using the dot-probe task was provided individually to the second group for 2 weeks at 15 sessions. The Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory were completed by the participants before, immediately after, and 1-month after interventions. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS v.22 software. Results: Both intervention groups showed a significant reduction in anxiety and depression at the post-test phase (p < 0.05), where LZNFB group showed more decrease in anxiety and depression than the ABMT group. This decrease continued in the follow-up period. Conclusion: Both LZNFB and ABMT with the dot-robe task are effective in reducing depression and anxiety of men with OUD under MMT. However, LZNFB is more effective. These findings add to the growing body of literature supporting the effectiveness of NFB and cognitive rehabilitation therapy in treating addiction-related comorbidities.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We describe the development and usability evaluation of a novel patient engagement tool (OPY) in its early stage from perspectives of both experts and end-users. The tool is aimed at engaging patients in positive behaviors surrounding the use, weaning, and disposal of opioid medications in the post-surgical setting. The messaging and design of the application were created through a behavioral economics lens. Expert-based heuristic analysis and user testing were conducted and demonstrated that while patients found the tool to be easy to use and subjectively somewhat useful, additional work to enhance the user interface and features is needed in close partnership with developers and stakeholders.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Withdrawal is believed to play a central role in the brain disease model of addiction. However, little research describes withdrawal-motives among untreated individuals in community settings. Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed syringe exchange program participants (n = 139) with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in Columbus, Ohio from January 10th to March 25th, 2023, to assess their perceptions of the role of withdrawal in OUD maintenance, treatment delay, and OUD's refractoriness to buprenorphine. Participants responded to a survey including DSM-5 OUD criteria, demographics, and questions about substance use and opioid withdrawal. Participant ages ranged from 21 to 65 years with a mean age of 37.5 years and standard deviation of 8.1. The racial distribution of the sample was as follows: 81% White/Caucasian, 12% Black/African American, 3% Native American or Alaskan Native. Results: Sixty-six percent of participants agreed, or strongly agreed that opioid withdrawal was "the most important reason" they had been unable to stop using opioids. Almost seventy-one percent agreed, or strongly agreed that worry about opioid withdrawal had caused them to "put off or delay" OUD treatment. Although all participants had active, untreated OUD at the time of recruitment, most (85%) had previously tried buprenorphine, and the majority (78%) reported having experienced buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal. Conclusions: Among this community sample of individuals with untreated OUD, withdrawal was perceived to have an important role in maintaining OUD, including by motivating OUD treatment delay. Prior buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal was common, suggesting aversion to withdrawal might possibly be associated with OUD's refractoriness to buprenorphine.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Chronic opioid intake leads to several brain changes involved in the development of dependence, whereby an early hedonistic effect (liking) extends to the need to self-administer the drug (wanting), the latter being mostly a prefrontal-striatal function. The development of animal models for voluntary oral opioid intake represents an important tool for identifying the cellular and molecular alterations induced by chronic opioid use. Studies mainly in humans have shown that polydrug use and drug dependence are shared across various substances. We hypothesize that an animal bred for its alcohol preference would develop opioid dependence and further that this would be associated with the overt cortical abnormalities clinically described for opioid addicts. We show that Wistar-derived outbred UChB rats selected for their high alcohol preference additionally develop: (i) a preference for oral ingestion of morphine over water, resulting in morphine intake of 15 mg/kg/day; (ii) marked opioid dependence, as evidenced by the generation of strong withdrawal signs upon naloxone administration; (iii) prefrontal cortex alterations known to be associated with the loss of control over drug intake, namely, demyelination, axonal degeneration, and a reduction in glutamate transporter GLT-1 levels; and (iv) glial striatal neuroinflammation and brain oxidative stress, as previously reported for chronic alcohol and chronic nicotine use. These findings underline the relevance of polydrug animal models and their potential in the study of the wide spectrum of brain alterations induced by chronic morphine intake. This study should be valuable for future evaluations of therapeutic approaches for this devastating condition.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioids are widely used for pain control and palliative care but have been associated with a variety of untoward effects, including opioid use disorder, addiction, and increased mortality. Patterns of opioid use in Israel are to date poorly described. METHODS: Using a community-based database, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of filled opioid prescriptions of Israeli HMO members 18 years of age or older during the years of 2010-2020 that filled at least one opioid prescription. Morphine milligram equivalent (MME) calculations were stratified by presence or absence of oncology diagnosis and by specific opioid medication. RESULTS: The percentage of HMO members who filled at least one opioid prescription increased every year from 2.1% in 2010 to 4.2% in 2020. There was an increase in the MME per prescription (44.2%), daily MME per capita (142.1%) and MME per prescription-filling patient (39%) from 2010 to 2020. Increased prescription opioid use is driven by a small group of non-oncological patients, which is less than 1.5% of opioid-prescribed patients and 0.1% of the adult population, primarily owing to fentanyl use. CONCLUSION: Supervision and control of opioid prescriptions in Israel should be a focused effort directed at patients prescribed uniquely high dosages rather than a population-wide strategy that focuses on all patients prescribed opioids. This should be complemented by improved physician training and access to non-opioid therapies, as well as improved data collection and analysis.

Asunto(s)