RESUMEN

Purpose: To protect the corneal endothelium, various ophthalmical viscoelastic devices (OVDs) are used during cataract surgery. In this study, we compared two sodium hyaluronate-based OVD, the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS OVD (test) with the animal-derived IAL®-F OVD (reference) during the surgical procedure. Methods: Fifty patients with bilateral cataract participated in the study: 50 eyes randomly received FIDIAL PLUS and 50 eyes received IAL®-F (ratio 1:1). Noninferior efficacy of FIDIAL PLUS compared with reference OVD (first objective) was evaluated using a paired t-test comparing the mean percent loss of corneal endothelial cells (CECs) with FIDIAL PLUS against the mean percent loss with IAL®-F. Corneal endothelial protection during cataract surgery with FIDIAL PLUS without significant (≥30 mmHg) postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) increase (main secondary objective) was assessed using a repeated measures logistic model comparing the incidence of significant postoperative IOP elevation between the two groups. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy were also evaluated by assessing secondary endpoints before and after surgery. Results: FIDIAL PLUS showed a statistically noninferior efficacy compared with IAL®-F; there was no significant increase in IOP in either group or different trends of the secondary endpoints were observed between the OVD groups. The safety profile was similar in both OVD groups and no adverse device effects were reported. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the equivalent efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS compared with the animal-derived IAL®-F, confirming the clinical value of this product.

RESUMEN

Purpose: Although ophthalmic viscosurgical devices are quite important for safe cataract surgery, currently, postoperative residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices can cause various complications. Previously, we developed a method to visualize residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices after irrigation/aspiration in vitro and found that the amount of residual ophthalmic viscosurgical device on a single-piece intraocular lens was greater than that on a three-piece intraocular lens. In the present study, we compared the amounts of residual ophthalmic viscosurgical device among various foldable intraocular lenses to investigate the factors that determine the quantity of residual ophthalmic viscosurgical device. Patients and Methods: Simulated cataract surgery was performed in pig eyes using an ophthalmic viscosurgical device labeled with fluorescent silica particles. After the simulated surgery procedure, the fluorescent silica attached to the intraocular lens was observed and quantified by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry after intraocular lens removal. The amount of residual ophthalmic viscosurgical device was compared among five representative single-piece intraocular lenses and one three-piece intraocular lens. Results: The distribution and amount of the residual ophthalmic viscosurgical device differed for each intraocular lens. The amount of silicon in the lens capsule differed among the intraocular lens types. Conclusion: The postoperative residual tendency of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices differed among various single-piece intraocular lenses. The behavior of the intraocular lenses within the capsule affected the residual tendency. The removal of ophthalmic viscosurgical device in the lens capsule should be tailored for each intraocular lens to improve efficiency.

RESUMEN

AIM: To report the clinical prognosis and pathological findings of accidental lens vacuolar changes in eyes with intraoperative exposure to a dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD). METHODS: Two patients who developed transient lens vacuolar changes during uneventful persistent pupillary membrane (PPM) removal surgery were presented and followed up. This event was speculated to be associated with an intraoperative dispersive OVD DisCoVisc (hyaluronic acid 1.6%-chondroitin sulfate 4.0%) exposure. Then, to provide the pathological basis for our speculation, another four cataract patients were randomly exposed to different OVDs, and their anterior lens capsules were investigated with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). RESULTS: After months, the subcapsular vacuoles in both PPM cases were gradually disappeared without visual deterioration. For the cataract patients, similar lens changes were observed intraoperatively in those exposed to a dispersive DisCoVisc but not a cohesive OVD IVIZ (sodium hyaluronate gel 1.0%). In addition, marked ultrastructural changes, including chromatin condensation, extensive cytoplasmic vacuoles, and obvious intercellular space between lens epithelial cells in the anterior lens capsules of all eyes exposed to DisCoVisc, were observed by TEM. CONCLUSION: The lens vacuolar changes may be associated with a dispersive OVD exposure. Therefore, it is not preferable to use dispersive OVDs in patients with transparent lenses or without the intention of lens extraction. In addition, close follow-ups instead of immediate lens extraction are recommended for the occurrence of similar lens lesions.

RESUMEN

Ophthalmic viscoelastic devices (OVDs) are currently used in cataract surgery and have significantly improved the safety and effectiveness of this surgical procedure. OVDs are classified according to the zero-shear viscosity and the cohesion-dispersion index in cohesive, dispersive, and viscoadaptives. OVDs create and maintain anterior chamber depth and visibility, protecting the corneal endothelium and other intraocular tissues during surgery. The selection of the most adequate OVD is especially relevant when performing cataract surgery in challenging cases, such as in hard, mature cataracts, flat anterior chamber, pseudoexfoliation syndrome, intraoperative floppy iris syndrome, or glaucoma surgery. In such cases, OVD is crucial for facilitating the surgical procedure and the associated minimal complication rate. The use of a combination of OVDs (soft-shell technique and modifications), the use of blue-colored OVDs, and the combination of sodium hyaluronate with lidocaine have also been described as useful tools in some of these challenging cases.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) as corneal wetting agents for the wet shell technique, a common procedure in Japan to maintain the wettability of corneal surfaces. METHODS: We surveyed Japanese ophthalmologists to determine the current state of the wet shell technique. After developing three ex vivo testing methods, we evaluated the corneal wetting properties of OVDs including 3% hyaluronic acid (HA) solution and OVD products, Opegan, Opelead, Viscoat, Shellgan, Discovisc, and Opegan-Hi. RESULTS: Overall, 214 ophthalmologists (70%) had performed the wet shell technique, and 91% of ophthalmologists who performed vitreous surgery had performed this technique. Using a questionnaire, we evaluated the performance of OVD as corneal wetting agents as follows: (i) visibility, smoothness of OVD surface; (ii) spreadability, coverage of the cornea; and (iii) retention durability, residual ratio of OVD on the corneal surface. The smoothness and spreadability of Opegan, Opelead, and 3% HA were superior to other OVDs. Adding an appropriate amount of balanced salt solution to the other OVDs improved smoothness and spreadability similar to that of Opelead or 3% HA. Shellgan and Viscoat, combination OVDs consisting of 3% HA and 4% chondroitin sulfate, showed high retention durability, resulting in remaining longer on the cornea compared with other OVDs. CONCLUSIONS: Physical properties of OVDs tested in this study may provide useful information for ophthalmologists to select a suitable OVD when performing the wet shell technique.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Conjunctival retention cysts may recur if not completely removed. However, the cyst wall often ruptures during surgical excision, making complete removal difficult. In order to ensure complete cyst excision, we used a method of staining the inner cyst wall using trypan blue augmented by Methyl cellulose. OBSERVATION: Interventional study. Staining was performed by injecting trypan blue using an insulin needle. Then the needle was kept in place and methyl cellulose was injected to make the cyst content viscous to avoid its collapse after removing the needle. By using this technique, it was possible to excise the lesion as a whole. Three patients were included (unilateral). Two patients had cysts that were secondary to trachoma and were followed for up to 2 years without recurrence. A third patient had a conjunctival cyst following strabismus surgery was not successfully removed. CONCLUSION: This method is simple and effective for complete excision of conjunctival retention cysts exception for cysts post strabismus surgery.

RESUMEN

Purpose: To investigate whether there is a difference between symptoms of floaters according to the type of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices(OVDs) used during phacoemulsification. Methods: A total of 112 eyes had undergone standard phacosurgery with the dispersive OVDs(Group1). Group2 comprised 117 eyes that underwent phacosurgery with the dispersive OVDs, but between continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis and hydrodissection, some OVDs had been removed. Group3 included 120 eyes that had undergone phacosurgery with the cohesive OVDs. Results: 14 eyes (12.5%) of Group1 had new-onset floater after surgery whereas 6 eyes (5.13%) in Group2, and 7 eyes (5.83%) in Group3 at the day after and a week after surgery. This was significantly higher in Group1 than Group2 and Group3, respectively (p=0.047,0.049). Conclusion: Cataract surgery with dispersive OVD can predispose the eye to an increased floater symptom. Therefore, surgeons should consider release some OVDs during hydrodissection with dispersive viscoelastics and keep trying to avoid IOP surge during surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We described a technique to perform anterior synechiolysis with a healon needle and Viscoat® ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) through anterior lamellar dissection in penetrating keratoplasty. METHODS: OVDs were gently injected between iridocorneal adhesions with a healon needle to make a blunt dissection after anterior lamellar corneal dissection. Anterior synechiolysis at 360 degrees was completed with a healon needle and OVDs. Subsequently, the deep corneal lamella was cut with right and left Troutman-Katzin corneal scissors. 24 interrupted sutures were made with 10-0 nylon suture to implant the donor cornea. RESULTS: In two eyes from two patients, with corneal opacity and nearly total anterior synechiae, clear grafts and relatively deep anterior chambers were achieved. Penetrating keratoplasty with anterior synechiolysis was thus successful with a healon needle and OVDs through lamellar dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior synechiolysis with a healon needle and OVDs through lamellar dissection is a safe and efficient technique for keratoplasty in patients with corneal opacity with anterior synechiae.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A critical step in phacoemulsification (as well as extracapsular cataract extraction) is making a window in anterior capsule wall (i.e. anterior capsulotomy). Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorhexis (CCC) has become recognized as the standard method of anterior capsulectomy. Techniques employed for CCC have undergone sustained evolution. The present review evaluates elementary principles of CCC. Management of CCC in the presence of small pupil and pseudoexfoliation syndrome is discussed. Main differences of pediatric CCC from its adult-style counterpart and finally several techniques of rescue of an extending capsulorhexis are also reviewed.

RESUMEN

Foreign bodies may drop during removal from the posterior segment and result in foveal damage. Due to high specific gravity and viscosity, ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) can dampen and redirect the force of the dropping foreign body and therefore protect the fovea. Herein we describe our technique of foveal protection with OVDs and briefly demonstrate the results in five eyes with large posterior segment foreign bodies.