RESUMEN

Modern medicine has revolutionized family planning. Remarkably, women1 can carry to term embryos with whom they share no genetic connection, a feat made possible through egg donation and/or gestational surrogacy. Our reproductive systems evolved to accommodate embryos that are 50% related to the carrier, not 0% related. Here, we apply evolutionary theory to explain how and why pregnancy is riskier with an unrelated embryo. When a woman gestates an unrelated embryo, she is significantly more likely to develop preeclampsia and other diseases above and beyond the known risks associated with advanced maternal age, IVF, multiple gestation, and subfertility. Such "allogeneic pregnancies" are riskier even in fertile, healthy, commercial surrogates and when the egg is donated by a young, healthy donor. We propose that unrelated embryos present a special immune challenge to the gestational carrier, because they have fewer matching genes to the maternal body-therefore exacerbating symptoms of evolutionary maternal-fetal conflict. Indeed, maternal risks seem lower when the embryo is more related to the carrier, e.g., if a sister donates the egg. Finally, we discuss microchimerism in egg donation pregnancies, whereby wholly foreign cells pass from mother to embryo and vice-versa. We conclude with several medical proposals. First, egg donors and surrogates should be informed of the increased health risks they would face. In considerations of risk, these young, fertile women should not be compared to older, infertile women undergoing IVF; the proper comparison group is other young, fertile women. Second, contrary to some medical advice, perhaps genetically-related egg donors and surrogates should be preferred, all else equal. An immunological matching scheme, like what is used for organ transplants, could improve surrogate pregnancy outcomes. Third, more research is needed on microchimerism, sperm exposure, and the long-term impacts of allogeneic pregnancies on maternal and child health.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We present a rare case of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in a 19-year-old woman undergoing a second donation cycle of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. The patient developed severe OHSS despite the implementation of preventive strategies and required hospitalization for 14 days, including treatment in the intensive care unit. The underlying pathophysiology that triggers this extreme systemic response in certain patients, despite the implementation of preventive measures, remains unknown. Continued research efforts are necessary to improve our understanding and management of this condition.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A new approach to evaluate whether Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with micronized vaginal progesterone was as effective as using dydrogesterone in suppress LH pulse surge in young women under stimulation in an oocyte donor programme. METHODS: This prospective study included 21 patients aged 19 to 32 years-old stimulated with Elonva® 150, associated or not with Menopur® or Merional® (75 or 150IU) since the beginning of the cycle, plus HMG 150-225IU after the 8th day or just HMG 150-300IU per day. Patients were placed in a PPOS protocol with micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) 200 mg (Gynpro® Exeltis or Junno Farmoquimica) every 12 hours or dydrogesterone (Duphaston® Abbott) 10 mg every 8 hours from the start of stimulation until the day after the GnRH trigger with Triptorelin 0.2 mg (Gonapeptyl daily®). The primary endpoint was the prevention of untimely LH surge, and secondarily the number of 16 mm follicles, retrieved oocytes and metafase II. RESULTS: Fourteen oocyte donor patients were prescribed MVP while seven others received dydrogesterone (DYG).The gonadotropin protocols included 04 with Corifollitropin alfa 150 plus HMG since the beginning and complemented after the 7th day, and 17 times of just HMG. There was no diferences in the number of follicles >10≤15mm, ≥16mm or number of metafase II oocytes. There was no untimely LH surge on both groups and no OHSS was developed after the agonist trigger. CONCLUSIONS: Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with micronized vaginal progesterone seems to be a compelling choice for preventing premature ovulation without compromising oocyte quality in women undergoing ovarian stimulation.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) and markers of ovarian reserve and outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation among young, healthy oocyte donors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: A total of 547 oocyte donors who underwent 905 oocyte retrieval cycles (2008-2020) at a private fertility center in Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States. INTERVENTIONS: Neighborhood deprivation index was calculated using principal component analysis applied to census-level measures of poverty, employment, household composition, and public assistance, which was then standardized and linked to donor information on the basis of donor residence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Markers of ovarian reserve, including antral follicle count (AFC) and antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels, and outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation including number of total and mature oocytes retrieved and ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) (defined as the number of oocytes retrieved/total gonadotropin dose × 1,000). Multivariable generalized estimating equations with Poisson and normal distribution were used to model the relationship between NDI and outcome measures adjusting for age, body mass index, and year of retrieval. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of donors was 25.0 (2.8) years and 29% of the donors were racial or ethnic minorities. There were no associations between donor NDI and ovarian reserve markers. For every interquartile range increase in NDI, there was a reduction of -1.5% (95% confidence interval: -5.3% to 2.4%) in total oocytes retrieved although the effect estimate was imprecise. Associations of NDI with a number of mature oocytes retrieved and OSI were in a similar direction. We observed evidence for effect modification of the NDI and OSI association by donor race. There was a suggestive positive association between NDI and OSI in Black donors but no association in White donors. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of young, healthy, racially diverse oocyte donors, we found little evidence of associations between NDI and markers of ovarian reserve or outcomes of ovarian stimulation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with dydrogesterone from cycle day 7 yield similar outcomes compared with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in the same oocyte donors? DESIGN: This retrospective longitudinal study included 128 cycles from 64 oocyte donors. All oocyte donors had the same type of gonadotrophin and daily dose in both stimulation cycles. The primary outcome was the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) retrieved. RESULTS: The number of COC retrieved (mean ± SD 19.7 ± 10.8 versus 19.2 ± 8.3; P = 0.5) and the number of metaphase II oocytes (15.5 ± 8.4 versus 16.2 ± 7.0; P = 0.19) were similar for the PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocols, respectively. The duration of stimulation (10.5 ± 1.5 days versus 10.8 ± 1.5 days; P = 0.14) and consumption of gonadotrophins (2271.9 ± 429.7 IU versus 2321.5 ± 403.4 IU; P = 0.2) were also comparable, without any cases of premature ovulation. Nevertheless, there was a significant difference in the total cost of medication per cycle: €898.3 ± 169.9 for the PPOS protocol versus €1196.4 ± 207.5 (P < 0.001) for the GnRH antagonist protocol. CONCLUSION: The number of oocytes retrieved and number of metaphase II oocytes were comparable in both stimulation protocols, with the advantage of significant cost reduction in favour of the PPOS protocol compared with the GnRH antagonist protocol. No cases of premature ovulation were observed, even when progestin was started later in the stimulation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does rescue in-vitro maturation (IVM) in the presence or absence of cumulus cells, affect the progress of meiosis I, compared with oocytes that mature in vivo? DESIGN: This prospective study was conducted in a university-affiliated fertility centre. Ninety-five young oocyte donors (mean age 25.57 ± 4.47) with a normal karyotype and no known fertility problems were included. A total of 390 oocytes (116 mature metaphase II [MII] and 274 immature oocytes) were analysed. The immature oocytes underwent rescue IVM in the presence of cumulus cells (CC; IVM+CC; n = 137) or without them (IVM-CC; n = 137), and IVM rate was calculated. Chromosome copy number analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on all rescue IVM oocytes reaching MII as well as those that were mature at the time of initial denudation (in-vivo-matured oocytes [IVO]). RESULTS: Maturation rates were similar in IVM+CC and IVM-CC oocytes (62.8 versus 71.5%, P = 0.16). Conclusive cytogenetic results were obtained from 65 MII oocytes from the IVM+CC group, 87 from the IVM-CC group, and 99 from the IVO group. Oocyte euploidy rates for the three groups were similar, at 75.4%, 83.9% and 80.8%, respectively (P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that culture of germinal vesicle and metaphase I oocytes in the presence of cumulus cells does not improve rates of IVM. In general, the process of rescue IVM does not appear to alter the frequency of oocytes with a normal chromosome copy number.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between high antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels in oocyte donors and embryo development and pregnancy outcomes among donor oocyte recipients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Donor Egg Bank Database. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing in vitro fertilization using vitrified donor oocytes from 35 in vitro fertilization centers in the United States between 2013 and 2021. For each recipient, the first oocyte lot that was received with a planned insemination and embryo transfer (ET) was included. INTERVENTION: Oocyte donor-recipient cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) per ET. RESULTS: A total of 3,871 donor oocyte-recipient thaw cycles were analyzed. On the basis of donor AMH serum concentration, cycles were stratified into the high AMH group (AMH ≥5 ng/mL; n = 1,821) and the referent group (AMH <5 ng/mL; n = 2,050). Generalized estimating equation models were used to account for donors that contributed more than one lot of oocytes. The number of usable embryos per lot (median [interquartile range]) was significantly increased in the high AMH group (2 [2-4]) compared with the referent group (2 [1-3]) (relative risk [RR] 1.06; confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.12). Among recipients with a planned ET, there was no difference in OPR between the high AMH group (45.4%) and the referent group (43.5%) (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.94-1.15). Among preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles, the embryo euploidy rate per biopsy was similar at 66.7% (50%-100%) in both groups (RR 1.04; CI 0.92-1.17). The OPR per euploid ET among patients who used preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was also comparable, at 52% in the high AMH group and 54.1% in the referent group (RR 0.95; CI 0.74-1.23). CONCLUSION: This large national database study observed that there was no association between a high level of AMH (≥5 ng/mL) in oocyte donors and an OPR in the recipient after the first ET. On the basis of these findings, recipients and physicians can be reassured that oocyte donors with a high AMH level can be expected to produce outcomes that are at least as good as donors with an AMH level (<5 ng/mL).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: To study the efficacy of estradiol for cycle programming in oocyte donors when administered in the follicular phase only. Design: Prospective interventional study. Setting: Single fertility center. Patients: Ninety-three oocyte donors underwent programmed stimulation using estradiol in the follicular phase. Their previous unprogrammed cycles were used as historical controls. Interventions: Donors received 8 mg of estradiol hemihydrate from day 2 till 1 day before the start of stimulation. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measures studied were the number of oocytes retrieved, duration of stimulation, and total gonadotropin dose. The number of mature oocytes, oocyte maturation rate, fertilization rate, blastulation rate, implantation rate, and pregnancy rate were the secondary outcomes. Results: The average number of oocytes retrieved was higher in the study group (36.4 vs. 32.5). The duration of stimulation (9.22 vs. 9.21 days) and the total gonadotropin dose were similar (3,085.5 vs. 3,026 IU) between both groups. The mean number of mature oocytes retrieved was higher in the study group (30.1 vs. 26.3), but the maturation rate was similar (84.6% vs. 81.2%). The fertilization rate (77.8% vs. 78.7%), number of blastocysts, blastulation rate (32.7% vs. 33.2%), implantation rate (59.3% vs. 66.3%), and pregnancy rate (77.3% vs. 77.1%) showed no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: Estradiol usage in the follicular phase alone is an effective and convenient option for cycle programming in oocyte donors. It can yield similar mature oocytes and does not affect the clinical outcomes. Further larger sample-sized studies may be needed to validate its use which can also be extended to routine in vitro fertilization cycles. Clinical Trials Registration Number: CTRI/2020/09/027815.

RESUMEN

Los donantes de gametos constituyen un grupo especialmente involucrado en los tratamientos de re- producción asistida, así como en la salud reproductiva, pues ayudan a muchos pacientes a solucionar sus problemas reproductivos. No obstante, existen pocos estudios en España que aborden el conoci- miento que las donantes de gametos tienen acerca de su salud reproductiva. Por ello, el objetivo de este estudio ha sido conocer el grado de conocimiento que las donantes de gametos tienen sobre salud re- productiva y fertilidad. Se ha realizado un estudio prospectivo, transversal y multicéntrico que incluyó donantes de ovocitos de 10 clínicas de reproducción asistida en España. Durante 2 meses se han reclu- tado donantes entre 19 y 35 años, de las cuales, 63 han sido incluidas en el estudio, en el que se ha re- alizado un cuestionario de 41 preguntas divididas en tres partes: características sociodemográficas (11 preguntas), conocimientos sobre fertilidad (22 preguntas) y un cuestionario en escala de Likert para de- terminar la información que tenían sobre salud reproductiva, así como los riesgos acerca de su fertilidad (8 preguntas). Además de la estadística descriptiva, se ha realizado el análisis estadístico con Chi-cua- drado y p<0,05 se consideró significativo.Los resultados mostraron que las participantes evalúan el aumento de la edad de las mujeres como un factor de riesgo decisivo para la fertilidad, pero sin un conocimiento exacto, pues el 39,7 % afirmó que la disminución de la fertilidad sucedía entre los 35 y 40 años, y un 30 % afirmó que sucedía entro los 40 y los 45 años. Sólo el 47 % de las encuestadas entiende qué es la reserva ovárica. El 47,6 % de las donantes cree que las mujeres crean nuevos óvulos cada mes.Los resultados obtenidos en este estudio nos muestran que las donantes son conscientes de que existen alteraciones de la fertilidad, pero sus conocimientos sobre salud reproductiva pueden ser insuficientes. (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

To identify the perceptions of women oocyte donors this qualitative study was conducted on 30 oocyte donors using in-depth interview. The three main categories of decision-making challenge, the consequences of participation in assisted reproductive treatment, and the contrast between the self-image and social-image of the donor were inferred. Financial and altruistic motivation, social taboo, and the approval of trusted people were the sub-categories of the decision-making challenge. The results of the study showed that the decision for oocyte donation follows the effort of women to balance the financial and spiritual benefits of the donation against its cultural barriers.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In patients with high serum E2 embryo transfer is often postponed, as high E2 levels adversely affect embryo transfer outcome. We aimed to determine if stratified serum oestradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels differentially affect endometrial histology and endometrial oestrogen and progesterone receptor protein levels. Endometrial biopsies were collected from oocyte donors. Samples were divided based on peak serum E2 levels into three groups: (i) low-E2 (n = 33) E2≤2999pg/mL; (ii) mid-E2 (n = 40) E2 3000-4999 pg/mL; and (iii) high-E2 (n = 15) E2≥5000 pg/mL. Oestrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptors A and B (PR) protein levels in endometrial stroma (S), glandular (GE) and luminal (LE) epithelia were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Samples in high-E2 group demonstrated strongest association with accelerated endometrial maturation (2 (1-2); 2 (1-3); and 3 (2.8-3) median days of advancement of endometrial maturation respectively in low, mid, high-E2 groups, p = 0.046). There were significant differences in ERα and PR immunoexpression in S, GE and LE among the groups (p < 0.05). Higher E2 levels were associated with decreased ERα expression (p < 0.017) in GE and LE, and increased PR expression in S and GE (p < 0.011 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Higher serum E2 levels were associated with impaired endometrial steroid hormone receptor expression, higher serum P4 and more advancement of endometrial maturation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is cost effective to achieve a live birth compared with IVF alone in fresh donor oocyte cycles. DESIGN: Theoretical cost-effectiveness study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: Comparison between the cost of IVF with PGT-A vs. IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The model analyzed a hypothetical single fresh oocyte donor IVF cycle with PGT-A vs. IVF alone and followed the progression of a single embryo through the different decision nodes. Cost estimates assigned to each clinical event were based on data obtained from the literature and institutional costs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost per live birth. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in fresh donor oocyte cycles when compared with IVF alone to achieve a live birth. The cycles using PGT-A cost an additional $6,018.66. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was found to be $119,606.59 per additional live birth achieved with IVF with PGT-A. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that IVF with PGT-A was not cost effective in nearly all iterations. CONCLUSIONS: PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte IVF cycles is not cost effective compared with IVF alone over a wide range of probabilities and costs.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Oocyte donor in vitro fertilization (IVF) represents an ideal model to study the effects of embryo stage on reproductive success, as embryos come from young women with high-quality oocytes. Our study aimed to determine if embryo transfer stage affected outcomes in oocyte donor IVF, including the common scenario where only a limited number of quality embryos are available after culture. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analyzed anonymous vitrified donor oocyte cycles at a single clinic between 2008 and 2015. Overall, 983 recipients underwent 1178 warming cycles resulting in fresh transfer of one-to-two embryos. Our primary outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included multiple birth, birthweight, and gestational age. Log binomial regression with cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations were used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) accounting for recipient age, race, and transfer year. RESULTS: Among 132 cleavage and 1046 blastocyst transfer cycles, cleavage transfers were associated with lower probability of live birth (aRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.88). Subgroup analysis focused on cycles with a limited number of quality embryos 3 days post-fertilization (≤2), as clinically these women were most likely to be considered for cleavage transfers. Among these cycles (120 cleavage, 371 blastocyst), cleavage transfers were still associated with lower live birth rates compared to blastocyst (aRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.87) CONCLUSIONS: Even in a donor oocyte model with high-quality oocytes, there was a benefit to extended culture and blastocyst transfer, including when only one-to-two quality embryos were available after early culture. This is possibly owed to improved uterine synchronicity or decreased contractility.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A growing literature suggests that minority races, particularly Black women, have a lower probability of live birth and higher risk of perinatal complications after autologous assisted reproductive technology. However, questions still remain as to whether these racial disparities have arisen because of associations between race and oocyte/embryo quality, the uterine environment, or a combination of the two. Oocyte donation assisted reproductive technology represents a unique approach to examine this question. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the associations between the race of female oocyte donors and recipients and live birth rates following vitrified donor oocyte assisted reproductive technologies. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single, private fertility clinic that included 327 oocyte donors and 899 recipients who underwent 1601 embryo transfer cycles (2008-2015). Self-reported race of the donor and recipient were abstracted from medical records. Live birth was defined as the delivery of at least 1 live-born neonate. We used multivariable cluster weighted generalized estimating equations with binomial distribution and log link function to estimate the adjusted risk ratios of live birth, adjusting for donor age and body mass index, recipient age and body mass index, tubal and uterine factor infertility, and year of oocyte retrieval. RESULTS: The racial profile of our donors and recipients were similar: 73% white, 13% Black, 4% Hispanic, 8% Asian, and 2% other. Women who received oocytes from Hispanic donors had a significantly higher probability of live birth (adjusted risk ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.36) than women who received oocytes from white donors. Among Hispanic recipients, however, there was no significant difference in probability of live birth compared with white recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.26). Embryo transfer cycles using oocytes from Black donors (adjusted risk ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.03) and Black recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.99) had a lower probability of live birth than white donors and white recipients, respectively. There were no significant differences in the probability of live birth among Hispanic, Asian, and other race recipients compared with white recipients. CONCLUSION: Black female recipients had a lower probability of live birth following assisted reproductive technology, even when using vitrified oocytes from healthy donors. Female recipients who used vitrified oocytes from Hispanic donors had a higher probability of live birth regardless of their own race.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delayed parenthood, by both women and men, has become more common in developed countries. The adverse effect of advanced maternal age on embryo aneuploidy and reproductive outcomes is well known. However, whether there is an association between paternal age (PA) and embryonic chromosomal aberrations remains controversial. Oocyte donation (OD) is often utilized to minimize maternal age effects on oocyte and embryo aneuploidy, thus providing an optimal model to assess the effect of PA. Several studies have revealed a higher than expected rate of aneuploidy in embryos derived from young oocyte donors, which warrants examination as to whether this may be attributed to advanced PA (APA). OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The objective of this systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis is to evaluate existing evidence regarding an association between PA and chromosomal aberrations in an OD model. SEARCH METHODS: This review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception through March 2020 using the (MeSH) terms: chromosome aberrations, preimplantation genetic screening and IVF. Original research articles, reporting on the types and/or frequency of chromosomal aberrations in embryos derived from donor oocytes, including data regarding PA, were included. Studies reporting results of IVF cycles using only autologous oocytes were excluded. Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted independently by two reviewers using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale. A one-stage IPD meta-analysis was performed to evaluate whether an association exists between PA and aneuploidy. Meta-analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model to account for clustering of embryos within patients and clustering of patients within studies. OUTCOMES: The search identified 13 032 references, independently screened by 2 reviewers, yielding 6 studies encompassing a total of 2637 IVF-OD cycles (n = 20 024 embryos). Two 'low' quality studies using FISH to screen 12 chromosomes on Day 3 embryos (n = 649) reported higher total aneuploidy rates and specifically higher rates of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 in men ≥50 years. One 'moderate' and three 'high' quality studies, which used 24-chromosome screening, found no association between PA and aneuploidy in Day 5/6 embryos (n = 12 559). The IPD meta-analysis, which included three 'high' quality studies (n = 10 830 Day 5/6 embryos), found no significant effect of PA on the rate of aneuploidy (odds ratio (OR) 0.97 per decade of age, 95% CI 0.91-1.03), which was robust to sensitivity analyses. There was no association between PA and individual chromosome aneuploidy or segmental aberrations, including for chromosomes X and Y (OR 1.06 per decade of age, 95% CI 0.92-1.21). Monosomy was most frequent for chromosome 16 (217/10802, 2.01%, 95% CI 1.76-2.29%) and trisomy was also most frequent for chromosome 16 (194/10802, 1.80%, 95% CI 1.56-2.06%). WIDER IMPLICATIONS: We conclude, based on the available evidence, that APA is not associated with higher rates of aneuploidy in embryos derived from OD. These results will help fertility practitioners when providing preconception counselling, particularly to older men who desire to have a child.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a possible correlation between chromosomal aberrations and paternal age, analyzing embryos derived from young oocyte donors, with available preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy results from day 5/6 trophectoderm biopsy obtained by next-generation sequencing for all 24 chromosomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Canadian fertility centre. PATIENT(S): A total of 3,118 embryos from 407 male patients, allocated into three paternal age groups: group A, ≤39 years (n = 203); group B, 40-49 years (n = 161); group C, ≥50 years (n = 43). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes were aneuploidy, euploidy, mosaicism, and blastocyst formation rates. Secondary endpoints were comparison of specific chromosome aneuploidy, segmental and complex (involving two chromosomes + mosaicism >50%) aneuploidy, and analysis of overall percentage of chromosomal gains and losses within each group. RESULT(S): The study included 437 in vitro fertilization (IVF) antagonist cycles using 302 oocyte donors in which preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was performed. Overall, 70.04% of embryos were euploid, 13.9% were aneuploid, and 16.06% were mosaic. No significant differences among paternal age groups A, B, and C were found in euploidy rates (69.2%, 70.6%, 71.4%, respectively), aneuploidy rates (14.7%, 12.8%, 13.9%, respectively) or mosaicism rates (16.1%, 16.6%, 13.6%; respectively). The fertilization rate was lower in group C compared with group B (76.35% vs. 80.09%). No difference was found in blastocyst formation rate between the study groups (median 52% [interquartile range, 41%, 67%] vs. 53% [42%, 65%] vs. 52% [42%, 64%], respectively). A generalized linear mixed model regression analysis for embryo ploidy rates found older oocyte donor age to be independently associated with embryo aneuploidy (odds ratio = 1.041; 95% CI, 1.009-1.074). The rate of segmental aneuploidies was significantly higher in the older versus younger paternal age group (36.6% vs. 19.4%). CONCLUSION(S): No association was found between paternal age and aneuploidy rates in embryos derived from IVF cycles using young oocyte donors, after adjusting for donor, sperm, and IVF cycle characteristics. Advanced paternal age ≥ 50, compared with younger paternal ages, was associated with a lower fertilization rate and increased rate of segmental aberrations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

More and more centers are imposing expanded carrier screening (ECS) on their gamete donors. In some clinics and gamete banks, gamete donors are not given this right, contrary to the freedom to decline genetic screening in the general population. The possible social and psychological burdens that are recognized for infertility patients and the general population are downplayed for gamete donors. The procedure of imposing ECS on gamete donors shows that the interests of the recipients are valued higher than those of the donors. The general ethical argument defended here is the principle of proportionality: the burdens imposed on donors have to be balanced against the potential benefits for the offspring and the recipients. The risk reduction of ECS is below 1% and is too small to outweigh the potential dangers and disadvantages for donors. The conclusion is that clinics may ask, but not compel, donors to submit to ECS provided that they offer appropriate genetic and psychological counseling.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictive factors for successful pregnancy in oocyte recipient ICSI cycles in an egg-sharing donation program. METHODS: Analysed data were obtained via chart review of 1505 vitrified oocytes donated from 268 patients to 225 oocyte recipients, undergoing 307 ICSI cycles. Patients were participating in an egg-sharing donation program between January 2015 and May 2017. Adjusted generalised linear models were used to investigate the impact of oocyte donor and recipient characteristics on recipients' pregnancy achievement. RESULTS: Implantation rate in the oocyte donor was highly correlated with pregnancy achievement in the oocyte recipient's cycles (ExpB: 1.181, CI: 1.138-1.226, p<0.001). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the implantation rate in the oocyte donor has a strong predictive value for pregnancy success in the oocyte recipient (area under the curve: 0.98, CI: 0.95-0.99, p<0.001). Pregnancy in oocyte donors and recipients were highly associated (ExpB: 54.6, CI: 28.1-105.8, p<0.001), regardless of the oocyte recipient's age. In oocyte recipients, the high-quality embryos rates on days 2 (ExpB: 3.397, CI: 1.635-7.054, p=0.001) and 3 (ExpB: 6.629, CI: 1.185-37.092, p=0.031), and blastocyst development rates (ExpB: 2.331, CI: 1.086-5.001, p=0.030) were positively associated with pregnancy outcome. CONCLUSION: The strong association in pregnancy success between donors and recipients, and the lack of correlation between donor characteristics and cycles' outcomes, demonstrate the power of oocyte quality on the success of ICSI treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: How does ovarian stimulation in an oocyte donor affect the IVF cycle and obstetric outcomes in recipients? SUMMARY ANSWER: Higher donor oocyte yields may affect the proportion of usable embryos but do not affect live birth delivery rate or obstetric outcomes in oocyte recipients. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In autologous oocyte fresh IVF cycles, the highest live birth delivery rates occur when ~15-25 oocytes are retrieved, with a decline thereafter, perhaps due to the hormone milieu, with super-physiologic estrogen levels. There are scant data in donor oocyte cycles, wherein the oocyte environment is separated from the uterine environment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a retrospective cohort study from 2008 to 2015 of 350 oocyte donors who underwent a total of 553 ovarian stimulations and oocyte retrievals. The oocytes were vitrified and then distributed to 989 recipients who had 1745 embryo transfers. The primary outcome was live birth delivery rate, defined as the number of deliveries that resulted in at least one live birth per embryo transfer cycle. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study included oocyte donors and recipients at a donor oocyte bank, in collaboration with an academic reproductive endocrinology division. Donors with polycystic ovary syndrome and recipients who used gestational carriers were excluded. The donors all underwent conventional ovarian stimulation using antagonist protocols. None of the embryos underwent pre-implantation genetic testing. The average (mean) number of embryos transferred to recipients was 1.4 (range 1-3). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Per ovarian stimulation cycle, the median number of oocytes retrieved was 30 (range: 9-95). Among the 1745 embryo transfer cycles, 856 of the cycles resulted in a live birth (49.1%). There were no associations between donor oocyte yield and probability of live birth, adjusting for donor age, BMI, race/ethnicity and retrieval year. The results were similar when analyzing by mature oocytes. Although donors with more oocytes retrieved had a higher number of developed embryos overall, there was a relatively lower percentage of usable embryos per oocyte warmed following fertilization and culture. In our model for the average donor in the data set, holding all variables constant, for each additional five oocytes retrieved, there was a 4% (95% CI 1%, 7%) lower odds of fertilization and 5% (95% CI 2%, 7%) lower odds of having a usable embryo per oocyte warmed. There were no associations between donor oocyte yield and risk of preterm delivery (<37 weeks gestation) and low birthweight (<2500 g) among singleton infants. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Ovarian stimulation was exclusively performed in oocyte donors. This was a retrospective study design, and we were therefore unable to ensure proportional exposure groups. These findings may not generalizable to older or less healthy women who may be vitrifying oocytes for planned fertility delay. There remain significant risks to aggressive ovarian stimulation, including ovarian hyperstimulation. In addition, long-term health outcomes of extreme ovarian stimulation are lacking. Lastly, we did not collect progesterone levels and are unable to evaluate the impact of rising progesterone on outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Live birth delivery rates remain high with varying amounts of oocytes retrieved in this donor oocyte model. In a vitrified oocyte bank setting, where oocytes are typically sent as a limited number cohort, recipients are not affected by oocyte yields. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Additional REDCap grant support at Emory was provided through UL1 TR000424. Dr. Audrey Gaskins was supported in part by a career development award from the NIEHS (R00ES026648).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: Does late follicular-phase elevated serum progesterone (LFEP) during ovarian stimulation for oocyte donation have an impact on embryo quality (EQ) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR)? SUMMARY ANSWER: LFEP does not have an influence on EQ nor CLBR in oocyte donation cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Ovarian stimulation promotes the production of progesterone (P) which, when elevated during the follicular phase, has been demonstrated to have a deleterious effect in autologous fresh IVF outcomes. While there is robust evidence that this elevation results in impaired endometrial receptivity, the impact on EQ remains a matter of debate. The oocyte donation model is an excellent tool to assess the effects of LFEP on EQ from those on endometrium receptivity separately. Previous studies in oocyte donation cycles investigating the influence of elevated P on pregnancy outcomes in oocyte recipients showed conflicting results. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective analysis including all GnRH antagonist down-regulated cycles for fresh oocyte donation taking place in a tertiary referral university hospital between 2010 and 2017. A total of 397 fresh donor-recipient cycles were included. Each donor was included only once in the analysis and could be associated to a single recipient. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The sample was stratified according to serum P levels of ≤1.5 and >1.5 ng/mL on the day of ovulation triggering. The primary endpoint of the study was the top-quality embryo rate on Day 3, and the secondary outcome measure was CLBR defined as a live-born delivery beyond 24 weeks. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Three hundred ninety-seven fresh oocyte donation cycles were included in the analysis, of which 314 (79%) had a serum P ≤ 1.5 ng/mL and 83 (20.9%) had a serum P > 1.5 ng/mL. The average age of the oocyte donors was 31.4 ± 4.7 and 29.9 ± 4.5 years, respectively, for normal and elevated P (P = 0.017). The mean number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the elevated P group with 16.6 ± 10.6 vs 11.5 ± 6.9 in the P ≤ 1.5 group (P < 0.001).In parallel, the total number of embryos on Day 3, as well as the number of good-quality embryos at this stage, was significantly higher in the elevated P group (6.6 ± 5.6 vs 4.15 ± 3.5 and 8.7 ± 6.3 vs 6.1 ± 4.4; respectively, P < 0.001). However, maturation and fertilization rates did not vary significantly between the two study groups and neither did the top- and good-quality embryo rate and the embryo utilization rate, all evaluated on Day 3 (P = 0.384, P = 0.405 and P = 0.645, respectively). A multivariable regression analysis accounting for P groups, age of the donor, number of retrieved oocytes and top-quality embryo rate as potential confounders showed that LFEP negatively influenced neither the top-quality embryo rate nor the CLBR. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is an observational study based on a retrospective data analysis. Better extrapolation of the results could be validated by performing a prospective trial. Furthermore, this study was focused on oocyte donation cycles and hence the results cannot be generalized to the entire infertile population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first study providing evidence that LFEP does not influence CLBR and is adding strong evidence to the existing literature that LFEP does not harm EQ in oocyte donation programs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Not applicable.

Asunto(s)