RESUMEN

Upper-extremity limb salvage following high-energy trauma poses unique challenges of massive soft tissue injury in the setting of large bone defects, traumatic segmental neurovascular injuries, and functional deficits. These complex injuries require multidisciplinary care to achieve requisite revascularization, bone stabilization, and preservation of remaining options for soft tissue coverage. This case presents a 45-year-old man who sustained a high-velocity gunshot resulting in a dysvascular limb. Through shared decision-making, upper-extremity limb salvage was pursued. Successful initial limb salvage included a reversed great saphenous vein graft from the brachial artery to the radial artery, followed by one bone forearm with nonvascularized graft from the ipsilateral distal ulna, latissimus dorsi free functioning muscle transfer with an end-to-side anastomosis to the brachial artery proximal to the vein graft, and coaptation of the anterior interosseous donor nerve from the proximal median nerve stump to the thoracodorsal recipient nerve.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) Masada IIB has traditionally been treated by gradual ulnar lengthening with questionable efficacy in reducing the dislocated head. One-bone forearm (OBF) has been used as a reconstructive procedure in forearm deformities with very scarce literature for HME. The study aims to report short-term results of OBF as a definitive procedure for severe forearm deformities in Masada IIB patients with respect to clinical and radiological parameters. Materials and Methods: Four patients with HME Masada IIb were included in this retrospective study. All patients complained of forearm and wrist deformity with an abnormal bony protrusion restricting elbow motion. Indications for OBF were ulnar shortening > 3 cm, dysplastic proximal radius with convex radial head and restricted prono-supination. All patients were examined pre-operatively and post-operatively clinically and radiographically using the Peterson's outcome score. Results: The average age was 13 years (12-14 years). Pre-operative ulnar shortening, carpal slip percentage, and radial articular angle was 3.4 cm, 79.5%, and 47.5°, respectively. All radial heads were dislocated with convex articular surface restricting elbow extension and forearm prono-supination. At the latest follow-up, the mean elbow flexion was 110° with forearm in 10° supination. The mean carpal slip percentage, radial articular angle, and Peterson functional grade was 15%, 22.5°, and 8 points, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 30.25 months with no recurrence. Conclusion: We recommend one bone forearm as a definitive procedure in HME Masada IIB patients with severe forearm deformities with ulnar shortening > 3 cm and dysplastic proximal radius with a dislocated radial head, for faster return to function.

RESUMEN

Essex-Lopresti injuries are characterized by injuries to the proximal radio-ulnar joint, the distal radio-ulnar joint, and the interosseous membrane. This can lead to osteoarthritis, impaction syndrome, or instability. If all three structures are injured and lead to instability, the situation is almost unmanageable and many times ends in a one-bone forearm. In this article, we demonstrate a new way to reconstruct the proximal and distal radio-ulnar joint with two patient-specific coupled prostheses. These have been developed with the biomechanical conditions of the forearm in mind, where there are very large forces between the bones. As a result, we are able to present a patient previously severely restricted in the use of his hand and arm via a splint that compressed the forearm, who is now able to perform everyday activities and even light sports, such as badminton, without pain.

RESUMEN

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the ideal forearm position that allows maximum upper-limb function. In certain congenital/acquired upper-limb disorders, the management boils down to sacrificing rotatory movements of the forearm. The position of fusion that facilitates maximum upper-limb function is a topic of debate and is decided upon by personal preferences and assumptions. Although the literature has many level five evidence reports, there is a lack of well-designed research to answer the same question and we intended to study it both in dominant and non-dominant limbs. Methods: 15 healthy adolescent volunteers were fitted with a custom adjustable brace that simulated forearm arthrodesis in five rotatory positions. They were asked to carry out a series of activities as per Sollerman's hand function test, and each activity was scored using the standardized scoring system. The test was carried out with the brace fitted first in the dominant side, followed by the non-dominant side, and finally in both the upper limbs together. Results: We found that the mid-prone position allowed for the best function overall in both dominant and non-dominant upper limbs, and if both upper limbs required simultaneous fusion, our results suggest that fixing the dominant side in mid-prone and non-dominant side in 45° supination would be ideal. Conclusions: For unilateral forearm arthrodesis, the ideal position of fusion is the same irrespective of the dominance of the limb, whereas, for bilateral arthrodesis, limb dominance is to be taken into consideration. Level of Evidence: Level III quasi-experimental study.

RESUMEN

The single-bone forearm is a salvage technique for massive loss of bone due to serious trauma, malignant tumors, infections or congenital deformity. It is also described to treat the sequelae of hereditary multiple exostoses disease that affects the distal end of the ulna. We present the case of a 29-year-old patient, operated for sequelae of hereditary multiple exostoses disease of the left forearm by a modified single-bone forearm technique. The patient, right-handed, operated on twice in childhood for a hereditary multiple exostoses disease of the left forearm: incomplete excision of the exostosis of the distal end of the ulna and lengthening of this last on external fixator, without improvement. The patient presented for a deformation of the left forearm with shortening compared to the right side|. Significant limitation of prono-supination (pronation 15°, supination 20°). Elbow flexion at 110° and extension with deficit of 15°. Wrist flexion at 50° and extension at 50°, radial inclination at 25° and ulnar at 30°. The pain score was 3 according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), especially on effort. Dash score was 31,82/100. We chose the forearm technique with a single bone. The immediate postoperative result found a realignment of the forearm, without neurological or vascular damages. Consolidation was obtained in four months. At five months, the patient recovered elbow flexion at 110° and full extension, wrist flexion at 45° and extension at 50°. Radial inclination at 20° and ulnar at 25°. The single-bone forearm technique has been described, not only for the treatment of hereditary multiple exostoses disease, but also for serious trauma or tumors with massive loss of bone. The technique generally consists of an osteotomy of the radius as well as the ulna, fixing the radius to the ulna creating a synostosis, with or without resection of part of one or both bones of the forearm. The most described complications of single-bone forearm procedure are pain, complications related to soft tissue secondary to the previous injury, and infections. The one-bone forearm remain a salvage technique for massive loss of bone of the forearm, or large deformities due to congenital malformations. This technique could allow the excision of massive bone and keep only a part of the ulna and the radius, with function maintenance and aesthetic forearm preservation.

RESUMEN

The one-bone forearm (OBF) is a salvage technique that may be used to correct global forearm instability secondary to osseous defects. This study aims to provide an overview of the contemporary literature regarding the OBF. A literature review was conducted electronically across MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases in May 2020. Studies were eligible for inclusion if published in the English language; detailed the use of the OBF procedure to correct forearm instability; and were original data studies reporting qualitative or quantitative outcomes. Thirty-four studies, describing a cohort of 210 patients undergoing 211 OBFs, were documented in the literature. The primary etiology necessitating the OBF was trauma, followed by genetic/congenital disorders and infections. Technically, the OBF was most frequently achieved via an end-to-end osteosynthesis with plate fixation. In total, 85.0% (154/182) of OBF were fused in neutral rotation or varying degrees of pronation. Union was achieved in more than 80.0% (174/211) of OBFs. The OBF is a feasible salvage technique that has been used for a wide spectrum of pathology, providing satisfactory outcomes in most cases.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe a technique of end-to-end rigid fixation of the distal radius to the proximal ulna. The shortening and radioulnar overlap in this technique yield a high union rate, large corrections, and few complications. METHODS: This retrospective chart review from 2 centers was undertaken in 39 patients (40 forearms) who underwent one-bone forearm operations between 2005 and 2019. There were 25 male and 14 female patients, with a mean age at surgery of 9.7 years (range 3 to 19 years; SD, 4.5 years). The diagnoses included brachial plexus birth injury, spinal cord injury, arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, cerebral palsy, ulnar deficiency with focal indentation, multiple hereditary exostosis, acute flaccid myelitis, and tumor. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 33.5 months (1.2-110.1 months; SD, 27.1 months). The 36 forearms in supination had an average supination contracture of 93° (range, 15° to 120°; SD, 15.4°). The 4 pronated arms had an average pronation contracture of 80° (range, 50° to 120°; SD, 29.2°). The average postoperative position was 22.8° of pronation (range, -15° to 45°; SD, 12.9°). The average correction obtained with our technique was 113° (range, 20° to 145°; SD, 22.9°). Radiographic union was demonstrated in 32 (80%) of the one-bone forearms by 10 weeks, 39 (97.5%) by 16 weeks, and 40 (100%) by 24 weeks. One patient had peri-implant fractures prior to union. No forearms required reoperation for nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: One-bone forearm performed with this technique allows reliable healing and a large degree of correction. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The one bone forearm is a salvage procedure for treatment of painful, instability of the forearm that results from trauma, congenital deformity, tumor, infection, and failed reconstructive efforts. By creating a stable osseous bridge between the ulnohumeral and radiocarpal joints, one bone forearm addresses defects in the bony architecture of the radius and ulna, their articulations, and their associated ligamentous complexes. Global instability of the forearm is a complex clinical pathology with few other answers. Choice of technique should be dictated by adjacent bone loss. This article presents experience with creating a one bone forearm in patients using synostosis procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Major bone defects in forearm caused by severe trauma is a real challenge for orthopedic surgeons. This study aimed to evaluate the role of one-bone forearm (OBF) reconstruction combined with distal radioulnar joint fusion (DRUJF) as a rescue option under this difficult situation. METHODS: In total, 18 patients with major bone defects in forearm caused by severe trauma were selected from 2003 to 2017 and followed up for 2 to 16 years. All patients were managed in the Emergency Department and received emergency one-stage OBF combined with DRUJF. In addition, patient demographics, surgical techniques, clinical outcomes and complications were collected from the medical records. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 41.5 years (ranging from 23 to 58 years), with 11 males and 7 females. The mean time to union was 5.8 months; 17 patients had complete union, and 1 patient had infection with nonunion requiring secondary procedures. According to the criteria of Chen, 3 patients had a grade-I functional outcome, 14 patients had a grade-II functional outcome, and 1 patient had a grade-III functional outcome. Based on the Peterson scoring system, the outcome was excellent for 3 patients, good for 13 patients, fair for 1 patient, and poor for 1 patient. CONCLUSION: OBF reconstruction combined with DRUJF was an alternative surgical procedure as the emergency stage-one intervention for the treatment of traumatic major bone defects in forearm, which may be more functionally and cosmetically superior than forearm amputation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

One-Bone-Forearm (OBF) is a procedure in which the proximal stump of the ulna is fixed to the distal stump of the radius. Historically, the indications for OBF have been represented by forearm instability due to trauma, infection, tumor resection, and congenital deformities with severe radius and ulna bone loss. When major bone loss prevents direct fixation between ulna and radius a Vascularized Fibular Bone Graft (VFBG) may allow forearm bone reconstruction and fixation. In this study we report our clinical experience in 4 cases of OBF with VFBG performed in 3 patients. Compared to standard OBF technique with direct osteodesis, OBF with VFBG showed similar clinical results and high rate of healing even in case of bone infection. Moreover, composite osteocutaneous VFBG might concurrently allow to treat local soft tissue defects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Ulnar longitudinal deficiency (ULD) is a rare congenital disease of the upper limb. The deformities caused by ULD can be very challenging and may compromise hand function during daily activities. Although the first surgical intervention dates back to the year 1952 there is still no gold standard for treating this uncommon disorder. Two children aged 16 and 3 years with ULD Bayne Type II (partial ulna aplasia) were diagnosed and treated at our department with single bone forearm surgery to achieve stability and improve function using a modified surgical method. For the purpose of an additional gain in limb length and improved cosmesis we used an Ilizarov external fixator for soft tissue distraction including radius distalization prior to the creation of the single bone forearm. This new technique and results are presented and discussed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The one-bone forearm arthrodesis has been performed to change the position of the forearm in children with fixed supination deformity due to upper extremity neurologic deficit. In this article, we present a retrospective review of children with late obstetric brachial plexus palsy who underwent palliative surgery to correct severe supination contracture by one-bone forearm osteodesis and biceps re-routing. This technique has not been described previously. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, four consecutive patients with upper extremity weakness and severe supination contracture who underwent forearm osteodesis in neutral or slight pronation and biceps re-routing. The average age of patients at the time of surgery was 12 years six months (range, 7-14 years). RESULTS: The average follow-up was one year ten months (range, 1 year 6 months to 2 years 7 months). The rotation of the forearm set in neutral (3 patients) and 15° pronation (1 patient). No patients noted adverse effects on the shoulder, elbow or wrist, and none missed having forearm rotation. CONCLUSIONS: One-bone forearm osteodesis and biceps re-routing technique should be considered in some patients with fixed forearm supination deformity and concomitant severe pronation deficit. In this group of patients, repositioning the forearm in a more pronated (or less supinated) position may improve the use of that extremity in activities of daily living. The surgical technique is fairly simple and can be done in a single procedure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: The objective of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who underwent one-bone forearm (OBF) reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent OBF surgery between 1994 and 2014 was undertaken. Patient demographics, etiology, associated injuries, number of surgeries prior to OBF surgery, surgical details, and postoperative information were collected. A telephone interview was conducted at final follow-up, including a Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, a 10-point scoring system used by Peterson et al, and a series of questions concerning pain and patient satisfaction. Results: There were 6 males and 2 females with a mean age of 44 years (range, 20-66 years). All patients had traumatic etiology, with 6 having open wounds and 2 having closed wounds. All patients had union with a mean follow-up of 83.6 months (range, 16-218 months). The mean pain score was 3 (range, 0-8), of which 3 were painless (score 0). The mean QuickDASH score was 39 (range, 7-75), and 4 patients had good or excellent results according to the 10-point score system used by Peterson et al. All patients were satisfied with the result. Five of 8 had complications related to soft tissues that were residual from their prior injuries and surgeries. One patient had post healing fracture requiring revision fixation and 1 had a postoperative infection requiring parenteral antibiotics. Conclusions: OBF surgery is an effective salvage procedure for complicated forearm instability, particularly after trauma. While union rates are high, complications are typically related to pain and soft tissue secondary to the previous injury and reconstructive procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

One-bone forearm functions best when the proximal ulna and distal radius are present and joined (the ulnius). Six open forearm fractures accompanied by segmental radial defect were treated by the ulnius formation in a one-stage procedure. All patients had a stable and pain-free forearm, and were satisfied with the function and cosmetic appearance of the forearm.

RESUMEN

This report describes a 6 year-old boy who was treated with one-bone forearm procedure for acquired pseudoarthrosis of the ulna combined with radial head dislocation after radical ulna debridement for osteomyelitis. At more than 20 years of follow-up, the patient had a nearly full range of elbow movements with a few additional surgical procedures. Pronation and supination was restricted by 45degrees, but the patient had near-normal elbow and hand functions without the restriction of any daily living activity. This case shows that one-bone forearm formation is a reasonable option for forearm stability in longstanding pseudoarthrosis of the ulna with radial head dislocation in a child.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This report describes a 6 year-old boy who was treated with one-bone forearm procedure for acquired pseudoarthrosis of the ulna combined with radial head dislocation after radical ulna debridement for osteomyelitis. At more than 20 years of follow-up, the patient had a nearly full range of elbow movements with a few additional surgical procedures. Pronation and supination was restricted by 45degrees, but the patient had near-normal elbow and hand functions without the restriction of any daily living activity. This case shows that one-bone forearm formation is a reasonable option for forearm stability in longstanding pseudoarthrosis of the ulna with radial head dislocation in a child.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Congenital pseudarthrosis of the ulna is an extremely rare disease that is usually associated with neurofibromatosis. Various treatments have been introduced such as conservative treatment, nonvascularized bone graft, free vascularized fibular graft, one bone forearm procedure and the Ilizarov technique. However, it is difficult to obtain bone union. We report a case of pseudarthrosis of the distal ulna that was treated by a one bone forearm procedure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The occurence of pseudarthroses associated with neurofibromatosis is a well documented phenomenon, with the majority of reported cases in the tibia but quite rare in forearm,Only ten cases in the English-literature and one case in Korean-literature of this lesion revealed appearing in the bones of the forearm till now. Of these, four in solitary pseudarthroses of the ulna(4.5.15), five in a solitary lesion of the radius(7.8.10.16.17), and only two cases was on the both bones of the forearm(9.14). We are presenting the case report of a Korean adult male with the clinical stigmata and a positive familial history of neurofibrormotosis who had congenital pseudarthroses of both the radius and ulna of the right forearm. Therefore, the present case is the third to be reported. We treated him with by production of an one-bone forearm using a dual a onlay bone graft positioned in neutral of supination and pronation. A stable, functional extremity with good union of pseudarthroses were encountered.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Two cases of acquired absence of forearm bone secondary to compound comminuted fractures were treated by reconstructive surgery, which consist of surgical construction of one-bone forearm. The results of treatment were referred and the review of the literature was done concerning about surgical reconstruction of one-bone forearm.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

No abstract available in English.

Asunto(s)