Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Adv Ther ; 39(4): 1832-1843, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35218519

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Clopidogrel has been demonstrated to be effective in improving coronary microcirculation (CM) among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolytics. Ticagrelor is a more potent adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor blocker proven to be superior to clopidogrel among patients with acute coronary syndromes. The present study aimed to compare the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on CM in patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolytics. METHODS: The present study prospectively included 48 patients participating in the TREAT trial, which randomly assigned patients with STEMI undergoing fibrinolysis to ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. The primary endpoint of this study was the evaluation of the CM using the global myocardial perfusion score index (global MPSI) obtained by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). Platelet aggregation to ADP was evaluated by Multiplate® and expressed as area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The global MPSI demonstrated no differences between the groups [mean 1.4 (1.2-1.5) in the ticagrelor group and 1.2 (1.2-1.5) in the clopidogrel group (p = 0.41)]. Platelet aggregability was lower in the ticagrelor group (18.1 ± 9.7 AUC), compared to the clopidogrel group (26.1 ± 12.5 AUC, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: We found no improvement in coronary microcirculation with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel among patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolytics, despite the fact that platelet aggregation to ADP was lower with ticagrelor. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03104062.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Adenosina Difosfato/farmacología , Adenosina Difosfato/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Microcirculación , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/etiología , Ticagrelor/uso terapéutico
2.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr ; 32(9): 1075-1085, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31235421

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac shock-wave therapy (CSWT) has been demonstrated as an option for the treatment of patients with refractory angina (RA), promoting immediate vasodilatory effects and, in the long-term, neoangiogenic effects that would be responsible for reducing the myocardial ischemic load. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of CSWT on myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR) assessed by quantitative real-time myocardial perfusion echocardiography in patients with RA. METHODS: Fifteen patients (mean age 61.5 ± 12.8 years) with RA who underwent CSWT during nine sessions, over 3 months of treatment, were prospectively studied. A total of 32 myocardial segments with ischemia were treated, while another 31 did not receive therapy because of technical limitations. Myocardial perfusion was evaluated at rest and after dipyridamole stress (0.84 mg/kg) before and 6 months after CSWT, using quantitative real-time myocardial perfusion echocardiography. Clinical effects were evaluated using Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. RESULTS: The ischemic segments treated with CSWT had increased MBFR (from 1.33 ± 0.22 to 1.74 ± 0.29, P < .001), a benefit that was not observed in untreated ischemic segments (1.51 ± 0.29 vs 1.54 ± 0.28, P = .47). Patients demonstrated increased global MBFR (from 1.78 ± 0.54 to 1.89 ± 0.49, P = .017). Semiquantitative single-photon emission computed tomographic analysis of the treated ischemic segments revealed a score reduction from 2.10 ± 0.87 to 1.68 ± 1.19 (P = .024). There was improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society score (from 3.20 ± 0.56 to 1.93 ± 0.70, P < .05) and in Seattle Angina Questionnaire score (from 42.3 ± 12.99 to 71.2 ± 14.29, P < .05). No major cardiovascular events were recorded during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CSWT improved MBFR in ischemic segments, as demonstrated by quantitative real-time myocardial perfusion echocardiography. These results suggest that CSWT has the potential to increase myocardial blood flow, with an impact on symptoms and quality of life in patients with RA.


Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/terapia , Circulación Coronaria/fisiología , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Tratamiento con Ondas de Choque Extracorpóreas/métodos , Ondas de Choque de Alta Energía/uso terapéutico , Angina de Pecho/diagnóstico , Angina de Pecho/fisiopatología , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA