RESUMEN

Key Clinical Message: A self-insertion of the styrofoam in urinary bladder is relatively rare. The diagnosis might be missed due to concealing the history of self-insertion of the foreign body and the presence of gas in the bladder on CT and MRI. Younger patients with lower urinary tract symptoms should raise the index of suspicion. Abstract: Transurethral self-insertion of a foreign body into the bladder is the most common type of bladder foreign body, which is unlikely to be misdiagnosed. we report a case of self-insertion bladder foreign body and present the symptoms, imaging, diagnosis and treatment in a 14-year-old Chinese boy of Han nationality. Younger patients with lower urinary tract symptoms should raise the index of suspicion. Endoscopic removal of foreign bodies can be a challenge. Patients with self-insertion of foreign objects should undergo psychiatric evaluation to avoid repeated transurethral insertion of foreign bodies.

RESUMEN

AIM: This study aimed to determine clinical nurse and nurse manager perspectives on missed nursing care (MNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: This study utilized a qualitative exploratory descriptive design. METHODS: Data were obtained through focus groups and virtual interviews. Purposive sampling was used to select nurse and nurse manager participants in COVID-19 units and the Emergency Department in one large healthcare organization in the northeastern United States of America. RESULTS: A total of 15 nurses and nurse managers participated in the study. Results revealed five categories: medication delivery, turning patients, double checks, communication and rapport, and patient surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of factors contributed to the perceptions and experiences of MNC of COVID-19 patients during the early stage of the pandemic. The COVID-19 crisis put additional and unparalleled pressure on a strained nursing workforce. Hospital leaders are responsible for ensuring their frontline nurses have the resources they need to feel supported in their roles regardless of the presenting circumstances. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Nurse leaders should employ evidence-based strategies such as promoting and championing teamwork to support staff and reduce incidences of MNC during crises. Our current work may serve as a basis for informing future revisions of pre-pandemic measurement tools when applied in a pandemic-specific context. REPORTING METHODS: This manuscript adheres to the standards for reporting qualitative research (SRQR); a synthesis of recommendations. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There was not patient or public contribution for this study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Open clavicle fractures are rare, and there are no current reported cases in the literature of a missed open clavicle with resultant fracture-related infection and osteomyelitis. Case Report: We present a 65-year-old female with no reported medical history, who presented to our institution with left clavicular pain and wound drainage 8 days after she was struck by a motor vehicle in her home country of Guyana. She was found to have a missed open clavicle fracture with an associated severe infection. She was subsequently treated with irrigation, debridement, and distal clavicle excision. Conclusion: We present this unique case with a potential procedure which could prove beneficial in cases of infection, trauma, or oncologic lesions in which the distal clavicle is deemed unsalvageable.

RESUMEN

AIM: To compare the job crafting strategies nurse mentors use when mentoring students versus during periods of respite and to assess the effectiveness of these strategies in reducing instances of missed nursing care (MNC). BACKGROUND: Nurses who serve as mentors may have to train a group of nursing students on top of their routine nursing duties. The corresponding high workloads and limited resources may force them to decide which nursing care to delay or omit (i.e., MNC). The mentors' initiative and the actions they take to address the multiple job requirements which do not align with the organization's resources are referred to as job crafting strategies. Mentors can use these strategies to shape their role as nurses as well as their role as mentors, depending on their motives and personality. DESIGN: A longitudinal study with data collected at two time points. METHODS: One hundred nurse mentors completed validated questionnaires assessing job crafting strategies, MNC and work overload while actively mentoring students. Eighty returned for a follow-up during a non-mentoring period three months later. Data analysis included paired t-tests and hierarchical multivariable linear regressions. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in MNC between the two points (1.83 SD 0.6 vs. 1.82 SD 0.75; p=0.942). A decrease in hindering demands was noted during active mentoring compared with respite (2.6 SD 0.97 vs. 2.84 SD 0.96; p=0.038). Enhancing structural job resources was significantly negatively correlated with MNC during active mentoring, while enhancing challenging job demands was positively correlated with MNC during these periods (ß=0.48, p=0.18 and ß=-0.35, p=0.014, respectively). CONCLUSION: Nurse mentors can effectively reduce MNC by focusing on enhancing structural resources and limiting challenging demands during mentoring periods. It is essential for healthcare organizations to support nurse mentors with manageable workloads and necessary resources to maintain high-quality care.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy, the preferred treatment for acute large-vessel occlusion stroke, is highly time-dependent. Many patients live far from thrombectomy centers due to large geographical variations in stroke services. This study aimed to explore the consequences of long transport distance on the proportion of thrombectomy-eligible patients who underwent thrombectomy, the clinical outcomes with or without thrombectomy, the timelines for patients transported, and the diagnostic accuracy of large-vessel occlusion in primary stroke centers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study in a county with only primary stroke centers, ∼ 300 km from the nearest thrombectomy center. All stroke patients admitted over a year were retrieved from the Norwegian Stroke Registry. A neuroradiologist identified all computed tomography images with large-vessel occlusions. A panel determined whether these patients had a corresponding clinical indication for thrombectomy. RESULTS: A total of 50% of the eligible patients did not receive thrombectomy. These patients had a significantly higher risk of severe disability or death compared to the patients who underwent thrombectomy. The median time from computed tomography imaging at the primary stroke center to arrival at the thrombectomy center was over 3 hours. Additionally, 30% of the large-vessel occlusions were initially undiagnosed, and half of these patients had a corresponding clinical indication for thrombectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In a county with a long transport distance to a thrombectomy center, a high proportion of eligible patients did not undergo thrombectomy, negatively impacting clinical outcomes. The transport time was considerable. A high rate of large-vessel occlusions was initially not diagnosed.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The current evidence regarding interventions to improve oral health in older hospital patients is unclear. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review assesses the scope and nature of research activities and identifies gaps in the existing literature. METHODS: The inclusion criteria for this study included adults over the age of 65 years who were treated as inpatient outside of intensive care units and covered all interventions aimed at promoting oral health or hygiene. RESULTS: The systematic search yielded 12 final studies, focusing on oral healthcare interventions in various settings, primarily in high-income countries. The studies employed diverse designs including randomized controlled trials and prospective studies, with interventions mainly provided by multidisciplinary teams. The interventions aimed to improve oral health or prevent pneumonia. Overall, the studies highlighted a potential effectiveness of multidisciplinary approaches in improving oral health and preventing pneumonia in geriatric populations. CONCLUSION: This scoping review shows a limited and heterogeneous evidence base for oral health interventions for older patients in hospitals. The need for patient involvement is evident; however, there is often a lack of high-quality studies to draw robust conclusions.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess whether there is a discrepancy between clinical and autopsy-based diagnoses in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of cohort studies reporting on conventional autopsy-confirmed missed diagnoses. The discrepancy rate was per study calculated by dividing the number of patients with a missed diagnosis by the number of autopsies. Missed diagnoses were classified according to the Goldman classification as 'major' and 'minor' with major missed diagnoses further differentiated into Class I missed diagnoses (i.e., diagnoses that may have altered therapy or survival) and Class II missed diagnoses (i.e., diagnoses that would not have altered therapy or survival). Class I missed diagnoses constitute the primary outcome of interest. Pooled estimates for discrepancy rates (95% confidence intervals) were calculated using a mixed-effects logistic regression model with 'study' as random effect. Meta-regression was used to assess relationships between major discrepancy rates and autopsy rates, start year of study, and ICU type. RESULTS: Forty-two studies were identified totaling 6305 analyzed autopsies and 1759 patients with missed diagnoses. The pooled discrepancy rates for Class I and major missed diagnoses were 6.5% (5-8.5) and 19.3% (15.3-24), respectively. Meta-regression analysis revealed that autopsy rate was inversely associated with discrepancy rate. Class I discrepancy rates did not change over time. Burn and trauma ICUs had lower discrepancy rates as compared to medical ICUs, possibly because of higher autopsy rates. CONCLUSIONS: Missed diagnoses remain common in ICUs. A higher autopsy rate does not reveal more major diagnostic errors. These data support a clinically driven autopsy policy rather than a systematic autopsy policy.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Missed nursing care poses a significant challenge for healthcare staff in terms of patient safety and care quality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate presenteeism and missed care attitudes of nurses and to determine the correlation between presenteeism and missed care. METHODS: This descriptive, correlational, and observational study was conducted between February and August 2023. The Stanford Presenteeism Scale-Short Form and the MISSCARE Survey were used to collect the data among nurses at two public hospitals in a city in Turkey. The study was completed with 229 nurses representing 27.4% of the total number of nurses who met the inclusion criteria. The data was analyzed using a comprehensive analytical approach, including Cronbach's alpha analysis, frequency and percentage distribution, the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality, correlation coefficient analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient, and the Bonferroni test. RESULTS: The participants' mean age was 30.22 ± 7.14 years, and 74.2% of them were female. 53.3% of the participants reported difficulty providing patient care due to material shortages, and 62.9% experienced challenges delivering care due to the intensity of paperwork in the clinic. Nurses who felt that paperwork intensity affected patient care and were not confident in their care provision had higher levels of presenteeism (p = 0.041) and a significantly higher frequency of missed care instances (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Material shortages and high paperwork intensity are contributing factors to the difficulties experienced by nurses in their practice. These difficulties may lead to an increase in presenteeism and instances of missed nursing care. It is important to address these challenges to ensure adequate care provision and reduce the likelihood of presenteeism among nurses. The correlation between presenteeism and instances of missed nursing care highlights the impact of presenteeism behaviors on the quality of patient care.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recently, the incidence of missed miscarriage has gradually increased, and medical abortion is a common method to terminate a pregnancy. In the process of medical abortion, massive vaginal bleeding takes place, leading to emergency surgical haemostasis. Emergency surgery may produce infection and organ damage. Our study aimed to investigate the high-risk factors for massive haemorrhage during a medical abortion. METHODS: A total of 1062 missed miscarriage patients who underwent medical abortion participated in this retrospective study. According to the amount of bleeding, the patients were divided into a massive haemorrhage group and a control group. By comparing the general conditions of the two groups, such as fertility history, uterine surgery history, uterine fibroids, etc., the high-risk factors for massive haemorrhage during medical abortion were identified. RESULTS: Relative to the control group, the massive haemorrhage group exhibited a higher proportion of patients with a previous artificial abortion (51.9% vs. 38.1%, P = 0.001). Additionally, the massive haemorrhage group had a lower percentage of first-time pregnant women (32.1% vs. 40.4%) and a higher proportion of women with shorter pregnancy intervals (44.9% vs. 33.1%, P = 0.03). Furthermore, there were notable differences between the two groups regarding maximum fibroid size, the duration of amenorrhea, and gestational week (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, we determined that a history of artificial abortion and an amenorrhea duration of > 11 weeks represented high-risk factors for massive vaginal bleeding during medical abortion in missed miscarriage patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Food allergy (FA) is a common chronic condition among U.S. children. Children with FA and their families often report greater psychosocial burden, which is adversely impacted by the inability to participate in daily activities. Regularly attending school remains central to supporting the well-being of children with FAs and related academic success. Objective: The objective was to estimate the frequency of FA-related school absences, determine predictors, and understand how report of such absences is associated with FA-related psychosocial burden. Methods: A survey was administered to a nationally representative sample of U.S. households in 2015-2016, obtaining parent-proxy responses for 38,408 children. Prevalence estimates were based on responses from NORC's AmeriSpeak Panel (51% completion rate), which were augmented by nonprobability-based responses via calibration weighting to increase precision. Prevalence was estimated via weighted proportions. Multiple logistic regression models evaluated factors associated with FA-related missed school days. Results: Thirty-seven percent of children with FA who attended school in the past 12 months reportedly had one or more FA-related absence, with 13% missing 1-2 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.41-15.49 days), 17% missing 3-7 days (95% CI, 6.82-10.91 days), and 4% missing 8-14 days (95% CI, 3.13-6.20 days). Hispanic children were more likely to report missed school days in the past 12 months compared with white, non-Hispanic children with FA (odds ratio [OR] 1.62 [95% CI, 1.16-2.26]). Children with multiple FAs (OR 1.35 [95% CI, 1.03-1.76]), history of epinephrine use (OR 2.22 [95% CI, 1.70-2.90]), and anaphylaxis (OR 1.64 [95% CI, 1.26-2.14]) in the past 12 months, and those with a current epinephrine prescription (OR 1.05 [95% CI, 0.075-1.47]) have greater odds of reported FA-related school absence. Report of one or more FA-related absences was also associated with greater FA-related psychosocial burden (OR 1.72 [95% CI, 1.46-2.01]). Conclusion: Parent report of children missing school for reasons related to FA is remarkably common and associated with greater FA-related psychosocial burden.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate missed nursing care (MNC) in a home care setting. DESIGN: A new instrument was developed and tested performing a preliminary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional study in Italy. Reporting was performed according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. SAMPLE: Eight hundred out of a total of 2549 home care nurses enrolled in AIDOMUS-IT were considered for the validation of the Missed Nursing Care in Home Care (MNC_HC). MEASUREMENTS: The MNC_HC instrument was developed by a panel of experts and underwent content and face validation. Exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted. RESULTS: EFA revealed a one-factor solution, explaining 56% of the total variance for MNC_HC. CFA confirmed excellent structural validity, with a one-factor model showing an exceptional fit (χ2 (27) = 141.39, p < .001, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMR = 0.04, CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, factor loadings > 0.5). MNC_HC also demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.92). The activity with the highest rate of missed care was the documentation of nursing care (77%), while activities related to nursing techniques (e.g., injections, dressings, etc.) were reported to be missed less (33.63%). CONCLUSIONS: MNC_HC is a quick-filling, valid, reliable, and psychometrically sound instrument for measuring MNC in home care useful for future research.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopy in the treatment and diagnosis of penetrating thoraco-abdominal injury has been established. However, there is no clear consensus on the role of laparoscopy in blunt injury due to numerous reasons, such as concerns of missed injury and technical problems in treating various abdominal organs. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopy and evaluate its safety in managing blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. METHODS: The medical records and Korean Trauma Data Base (KTDB) of patients who underwent abdominal surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 at a single level I center were collected. Patients were classified into a laparoscopy group and a laparotomy group. The laparoscopy groups were matched 1:1 with the laparotomy group by using propensity score matching (PSM). Patient demographics, injured organ and its grade, operative procedure, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 128 patients were included. There was no significant imbalance in demographics between the two groups except sex. Injured organ and its grade showed no significant differences between the two groups except for the incidence of omentum. Small bowel and mesenteric repair were performed most often in both groups. Splenectomy, pancreatic surgery, duodenectomy, and liver resection were performed exclusively in the laparotomy group. Severe postoperative complication rate (3% vs. 20%: p = 0.004), length of stay in ICU (3.3 ± 3.2 days vs. 4.6 ± 3.7; p = 0.046), and operation time (93.9 ± 47.7 min vs. 112.8 ± 57.7; p = 0.046) were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group. The conversion rate was about 16%. There was no missed injury. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patients who sustained penetrating or blunt injury, laparoscopy is feasible and safe as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in selected cohort of abdominal trauma.

RESUMEN

Postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an important tool for preventing HIV infection but remains underutilized. In this narrative review, we aim to summarize the frequency of missed opportunities for prescribing PEP among studies from around the world, discuss the complexities of the challenges facing PEP provision, and describe possible solutions. We identified 20 studies published in the last 10 years among 43 832 individuals, of whom an estimated 41 477 were eligible for PEP. Of those eligible for PEP, PEP was prescribed among 27 705 (66.8%). There was a significant difference in PEP prescriptions in acute compared with non-acute care settings (63.5% vs 94.5%; P < .001). Emergent themes contributing to PEP underutilization included lack of provider and patient awareness, reduced PEP acceptability, HIV stigma and homophobia, lack of access (either to care or to medication), and stigmatizing policies. Each of those issues should be the focus of future PEP implementation efforts.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study investigates the relationship between burnout levels of moral distress and missed nursing care in pediatric nurses. DESIGN AND METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted between November and December 2023. Pediatric nurses working in two hospitals and providing direct care to children (n = 140) completed the Moral Distress Scale-Revised Pediatric Nurses, MISSCARE Survey - Pediatric Version and Burnout Measure-Short Version questionnaire. Multivariate regression analysis modeling was applied to test the mediating effect on the relationship between burnout, moral distress, and missed nursing care. RESULTS: There was a significant positive correlation between the Moral Distress Scale-Revised Pediatric Nurses and its sub-dimensions and the Burnout Measure-Short Version (p < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between the mean MISSCARE- Survey-Ped score of the nurses participating in the study and its sub-dimensions and Burnout Measure-Short Version (p < 0.05). Providing Benefit-Do No Harm, one of the Moral Distress Scale-Revised Pediatric Nurses sub-dimensions, and Labour Resources, one of the MISSCARE sub-dimensions, were found to be predictors of burnout. The ethical principle of Providing Benefit-Do No Harm was found to mediate between moral distress and burnout and reduce burnout associated with missed care. CONCLUSIONS: Accordingly, as the nurses' moral distress and inability to meet the necessary patient care increase, their burnout levels also increase. Providing Benefit-Do No Harm is an basic ethical principle that will positively affect the burnout level of pediatric nurses. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This study may provide insights into ethics training, communication improvement strategies, and individual support intervention programs aimed at reducing moral distress, and burnout and improving the coping mechanisms of nurses working in pediatric wards.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of financial hardship and Health-Related Social Needs (HRSN) among patients who missed their radiology appointment. METHODS: English-speaking adult patients, with a missed outpatient imaging appointment at any of a tertiary care imaging centers between 11/2022 and 05/2023 were eligible. We measured self-reported general financial worry using Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), imaging hardship (worry that the current imaging is a financial hardship to patient and their family), material hardship (e.g., medical debt), cost-related care nonadherence, and HRSNs including housing instability, food insecurity, transportation problems, and utility help needs. RESULTS: 282 patients were included (mean age 54.7 ± 15.0 years; 70.7 % female). Majority were non-Hispanic White (52.4 %), followed by Asian (23.0 %) and Hispanic (16.0 %) racial/ethnic background. Most missed appointments were patient-initiated (74.8 %); 13.5 % due to cost or insurance coverage and 6.4 % due to transportation and parking. Mean COST score was 26.8 with 44.4 % and 28.8 % reporting their illness and imaging as a source of financial hardship. 18.3 % and 35.2 % endorsed cost-related care nonadherence and material hardship. 32.7 % had at least one HRSNs with food insecurity the most common (25.4 %). Only 12.5 % were previously screened for financial hardship or HRSNs. Having comorbidity and living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with higher report of financial hardship and HRSNs. CONCLUSION: Financial hardship and HRSNs are common among those who miss radiology appointments. There needs to be more rigorous screening for financial hardship and HRSNs at every health encounter and interventions should be implemented to address these.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Globally, nurses' patient safety, care quality, and missed nursing care are well documented. However, there is a paucity of studies on the mediating roles of care quality and professional self-efficacy, particularly among intensive and critical care unit (ICCU) nurses in developing countries like the Philippines. AIM: To test a model of the interrelationships of patient safety, care quality, professional self-efficacy, and missed nursing care among ICCU nurses. METHODS: A cross-sectional, correlational design study was used. ICCU nurses (n = 335) were recruited via consecutive sampling from August to December 2023 and completed four validated self-report scales. Spearman Rho, structural equation modeling, mediation, and path analyses were utilized for data analysis. RESULTS: The emerging model demonstrated acceptable fit parameters. Patient safety positively influenced care quality (ß = .34, p = .002) and professional self-efficacy (ß = .18, p = .011), while negatively affecting missed nursing care (ß = -.34, p = .003). Care quality positively and negatively influenced professional self-efficacy (ß = .40, p = .003) and missed nursing care (ß = -.13, p = .003), respectively. Professional self-efficacy indirectly impacted missed nursing care (ß = -.32, p = .003). Care quality (ß = -.10, p = .003) and professional self-efficacy (ß = .13, p = .003) showed mediating effects between patient safety and missed nursing care. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: ICCU nurses' care quality and professional self-efficacy are essential mediating factors that can bolster patient safety practices, hence reducing missed nursing care. Therefore, healthcare organizations, nurse managers, and policymakers should cultivate care quality and self-efficacy by creating support programs and providing a positive practice environment. Nurses and nurse supervisors could directly observe missed nursing care in the ICCU to understand its underreported causes.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of different working periods on missed diagnoses in patients with colorectal polyps in colonoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who were diagnosed with colorectal polyps during colonoscopy in an outpatient department between July and December 2022. These patients were subsequently hospitalized for resection during this period. Patients with missed diagnoses were those who had newly discovered polyps in a second colonoscopy. The working periods were categorized as work, near the end of work, and delayed work, respectively, in the morning and afternoon. RESULTS: A total of 482 patients were included, and the miss rate of diagnosis was 48.1% (232/482), mainly in the transverse colon (25%), and the ascending colon (23%). Patient age was a risk factor for the miss rate of diagnosis (OR = 1.025, 95%CI: 1.009-1.042, P = 0.003) and was also associated with the number of polyps detected for the first colonoscopy (χ2 = 18.196, P = 0.001). The different working periods had no statistical effect on the missed rate of diagnosis (χ2 = 1.998, P = 0.849). However, there was an increasing trend in miss rates towards the end of work and delayed work periods, both in the morning and afternoon. The highest miss rate (60.0%) was observed during delayed work in the afternoon. Additionally, poor bowel preparation was significantly more common during delayed work in the afternoon. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing trend in miss rates towards the end of work and delayed work periods deserves clinical attention. Endoscopists cannot always stay in good condition under heavy workloads.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: The study aimed to measure and compare differences (a) in the unfinished nursing care interventions overall and the order in which they are left unfinished; and (b) in the underline reasons, as perceived by Italian, Slovak and Turkish nursing students. BACKGROUND: In recent years, in the nursing education context a novel line of research in the field of unfinished nursing care as those interventions required by patients, but omitted or delayed, has emerged. However, no studies have been conducted at the international level. DESIGN: An international, comparative cross-sectional study was performed in 2022-2023 and reported here according to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. METHODS: A multinational research network was formed with a convenient sample of 13 universities and 60 campuses (4595 students). The Unfinished Nursing Care Survey for Students (UNCS4S) was administered. A total of 1850 students participated. RESULTS: According to the UNCS4S total score, Italians reported an average 50.9 out of 110 unfinished nursing care interventions (CI95 % 47.6-54.1), Slovakians 54.9 (CI95 % 53.7-56.1) and Turkish students 50.4 (CI95 % 49.2-51.5) (p<0.001). Some interventions were reported more often as unfinished across countries as supervising the task assigned to the nursing aides, going to the patient without being called, spending the required time with the patient and their caregivers and emotionally supporting patients and their caregivers. In terms of reasons, total scores were statistically different across countries (Italy: 45.92 out of 90, CI95 % 43.91-47.9; Slovakia: 62, CI95 % 61.02-62.98; Türkiye: 72.29, CI95 % 71.13-73.45; p<0.001); however, at the factor level, communication issues, lack of material resources and issues in supervision of nursing aides were reported in all countries as the most important reasons of the unfinished nursing care. CONCLUSIONS: Students learn to shape and set priorities early in their nursing careers with similar order in what to leave unfinished as first, despite the different educational structures, care cultures and healthcare systems. Among the unfinished nursing care reasons perceived, the most influential were similar across countries, suggesting common areas for improvement. How to better prepare students to be resilient and capable of managing the challenges posed by unfinished nursing care episodes due to the lack of resources and communications issues should be considered as a priority by nurse educators.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The treatment of early miscarriage with medication is effective and low in side effects. Nevertheless, no uniform dosage regimen has yet been established, nor has it been possible to determine whether previous pregnancies and births with their respective modes of delivery play a role in the effectiveness of Misoprostol. This study aimed to find predictive parameters for successful treatment with Misoprostol in early miscarriage. METHODS: In a retrospective study at the Otto von Guericke University Women's Hospital, records of patients with early miscarriage and medical treatment using Misoprostol from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed for this purpose. The need for a curettage subsequent to treatment was scored as a parameter of failure. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science Version 28.0. The significance level was set to 0.050. RESULTS: We found that successful therapy with misoprostol was seen in 86% (n = 114). 14% (n = 20) of the patients had curettage after taking Misoprostol as advised. Out of 134 women, 16% (n = 21) reported mild side effects, with nausea as the leading one (9.2% (n = 12)). Significance was found comparing the measurement of double endometrial stripe thickness after the second cycle of Misoprostol in women with and without curettage after medical treatment (exact value two-sided 0.035 at p < 0.05). A cutoff value at 8.8 mm was calculated using ROC Analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the treatment of early miscarriage in the first trimester with Misoprostol is effective and has few side effects. The measurement of the endometrial stripe thickness after the second cycle of Misoprostol via transvaginal ultrasound could present a predictive marker during therapy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Moral sensitivity, missed nursing care and moral distress among healthcare professionals have received considerable attention in recent years. These factors represent important healthcare challenges for new nurses (graduation to 2 years of work experience). However, studies on the relationships among these variables in the context of new nurses in China remain lacking. AIMS: To explore the relationships among moral sensitivity, missed nursing care and moral distress in the context of new nurses in China. RESEARCH DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: A total of 228 new nurses were recruited from three tertiary hospitals in Qingdao, Shandong Province, China. Participants provided their sociodemographic and professional information and completed the Chinese Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire-Revised Version, the Chinese Missed Nursing Care Survey Version and the Chinese Moral Distress Scale-Revised Version. The data were analysed using Spearman's correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The means and standard errors of moral sensitivity, missed nursing care and moral distress were 40.71 (0.39), 9.82 (0.78) and 34.87 (2.41), respectively. The variable of missed nursing care exhibited a significant negative relationship with moral sensitivity and a significant positive relationship with moral distress. Regression analysis revealed that the main factors influencing new nurses' moral distress were educational background, nature of job, current unit, frequency of night shifts and the dimensions of moral strength and responsibility. These factors can explain 14.9% of the total variation. CONCLUSION: The findings revealed that higher rates of missed nursing care were associated with lower moral sensitivity and greater moral distress among new nurses. Therefore, developing interventions to reduce missed nursing care may be a promising strategy for improving moral sensitivity and preventing moral distress among new nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: In hospitals, moral distress can be improved by focusing on modifiable factors such as staffing resources, leading to better promoting new nurses' health and improving the quality of care. This study can highlight practices accounting for moral sensitivity and missed nursing care in nursing research and training programmes. REPORTING METHOD: Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.