RESUMEN

NVA1309 is a non-brain penetrant next-generation gabapentinoid shown to bind Cavα2δ at R243 within a triple Arginine motif forming the binding site for gabapentin and pregabalin. In this study we have compared the effects of NVA1309 with Mirogabalin, a gabapentinoid drug with higher affinity for the voltage-gated calcium channel subunit Cavα2δ-1 than pregabalin which is approved for post-herpetic neuralgia in Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Both NVA1309 and mirogabalin inhibit Cav2.2 currents in vitro and decrease Cav2.2 plasma membrane expression with higher efficacy than pregabalin. Mutagenesis of the classical binding residue arginine R243 and the newly identified binding residue lysine K615 reverse the effect of mirogabalin on Cav2.2 current, but not that of NVA1309.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Chronic penile pain (CPP) is a debilitating condition characterized by persistent penile pain, often accompanied by lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual dysfunction, severely impacting quality of life. Treatment options are limited. We report a case of a 38-year-old man with severe CPP effectively treated with mirogabalin. Initially diagnosed with balanitis, his symptoms evolved to include severe penile pain and mental instability, and he was unresponsive to standard treatments. After multiple failed therapies, mirogabalin was introduced, resulting in significant pain reduction and improved mental health within days. This case highlights mirogabalin's potential efficacy in treating CPP with neuropathic characteristics, suggesting it as a viable treatment option for similar cases. Further studies are warranted to explore its broader applicability.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a common type of central neuropathic pain (CNeP) that can occur following the onset of stroke. The oral gabapentinoid mirogabalin besylate (mirogabalin) is a selective α2δ ligand that is effective for the treatment of CNeP, including CPSP. However, it is unknown whether the analgesic effect of mirogabalin on CPSP varies in patients with different background factors. METHODS: This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of a multinational, open-label, long-term phase 3 study of mirogabalin for the treatment of CNeP conducted between March 2019 and December 2020. Data from patients with CPSP were stratified by type of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), stroke location (thalamus, putamen, brainstem, or other), presence/absence of motor weakness, median time since stroke (≥ 59 or < 59 months), and median duration of CPSP (≥ 55.5 or < 55.5 months). Efficacy was assessed with the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded. RESULTS: This subanalysis included all 94 patients with CPSP from the phase 3 study; all were Japanese, and the mean age was 65.3 years. The least squares mean change [95% confidence interval] in SF-MPQ visual analog scale (VAS) score from baseline at week 52 (last observation carried forward) was - 17.0 [- 22.1, - 11.9] mm. Among the subgroups, least squares mean changes in SF-MPQ VAS scores were not different. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate; severe TEAEs occurred in six patients (6.4%). Somnolence (25.5%), peripheral edema (13.8%), dizziness (11.7%), and weight gain (6.4%) were the most common ADRs, and the types and frequencies of ADRs were similar among subgroups. CONCLUSION: Mirogabalin was generally effective and well tolerated in patients with CPSP, regardless of background factors such as stroke type or location, presence/absence of motor weakness, time since stroke, and duration of CPSP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number NCT03901352.

RESUMEN

We aimed to examine the efficacy of combination therapies of Neurotropin® with tramadol and Neurotropin with mirogabalin for neuropathic pain management. A neuropathic pain model (L5 spinal nerve ligation model: L5-SNL) using male Wistar rats was generated through tight ligation of the left fifth lumbar nerve using silk sutures. Mechanical allodynia was assessed using the 50% paw withdrawal threshold. The combined antiallodynic effects were evaluated using isobolographic analyses. Small intestinal transit was evaluated using the charcoal meal test, and motor coordination using the rota-rod test. Neurotropin (50-200 NU/kg, p.o.), tramadol (7.5-60 mg/kg, p.o.), and mirogabalin (3-30 mg/kg, p.o.) showed a dose-dependent antiallodynic effect in L5-SNL rats. The combined antiallodynic effects of Neurotropin and tramadol were additive or synergistic, whereas those of Neurotropin and mirogabalin were additive. Neurotropin (100-400 NU/kg, p.o.) did not affect the small intestinal transit, whereas tramadol (30-100 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly inhibited it. Neurotropin (100-400 NU/kg, p.o.) did not affect the walking time, whereas mirogabalin (10-100 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly decreased it. Neurotropin dose-dependently ameliorated mechanical allodynia in rats, and combination therapy with Neurotropin-tramadol or Neurotropin-mirogabalin may alleviate neuropathic pain without aggravating the adverse effects of tramadol and mirogabalin.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most prevalent intractable chronic itch diseases worldwide. In recent years, new molecular-targeted drugs have emerged, but side effects and economic challenges remain. Therefore, since it is important for AD patients to have a wider range of treatment options, it is important to explore new therapeutic agents. Gabapentinoids, gabapentin and pregabalin, have been shown to be effective for the clinical treatment of several chronic itch. Recently, mirogabalin (MGB) was developed as a novel gabapentinoid. MGB is a drug for neuropathic pain and has a margin of safety between its side effects and the analgesic effect for animal experiments. Herein, we showed that MGB exhibited an antipruritic effect in a mouse model of AD using NC/Nga mice. Methods and results: The oral administration of MGB (10 mg/kg) inhibited spontaneous scratching behavior in AD mice and its effect was dose dependently. Then, when MGB (10 mg/kg) was orally administrated to healthy mice, it did not affect motor function, including locomotor activity, wheel activity, and coordinated movement. Moreover, gabapentin (100 mg/kg) and pregabalin (30 mg/kg), inhibited spontaneous scratching behavior in AD mice and decreased motor function in healthy mice. Furthermore, intracisternal injection of MGB (10 µg/site) significantly suppressed spontaneous scratching behavior in AD mice. Discussion: In summary, our results suggest that MGB exerts an antipruritic effect via the spinal dorsal horn using NC/Nga mice. We hope that MGB is a candidate for a novel therapeutic agent for AD with relatively few side effects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Treatment with taxanes can result in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). We investigated the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for the treatment of CIPN in patients who had been administered perioperative chemotherapy including taxane-based agents for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the case of 43 patients with early breast cancer who received a taxane as perioperative chemotherapy and were administered mirogabalin at the diagnosis of CIPN. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (83.7%) had grade 1 CIPN and the other seven patients (16.3%) had grade 2 CIPN. The median mirogabalin dose was 10 mg (5-30 mg). CIPN improved from grade 1 to 0 in 12 patients (27.9%) and from grade 2 to 1 in one patient (2.3%); 13 (30.2%) patients thus had an objective therapeutic response. There were no cases in which chemotherapy was reduced or discontinued due to CIPN. Adverse events were evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and included five cases of dizziness (11.7%), three of somnolence (7.0%), and two of nausea (4.7%), all of which were grade ≤2. There were no cases of serious (grade ≥3) adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Mirogabalin may be effective and safe for treating CIPN of patients who receive a taxane in a perioperative breast cancer setting.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is no approved effective drug for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) in China. Gabapentinoids including mirogabalin have shown promise, although data in Chinese patients are scarce. METHODS: This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for treating DPNP in China. Mirogabalin was administered at 5 mg twice daily for the first week and uptitrated to 15 mg twice daily for a total duration of 14 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in weekly average daily pain score (ADPS) at week 14; secondary endpoints included the ADPS responder rate, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire visual analogue scale score, patient global impression of change (PGIC), average daily sleep interference score (ADSIS), EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L), and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Of 393 patients (mirogabalin, n = 196; placebo n = 197), the mean age was 58.2 years (mirogabalin, 58.7 years; placebo, 57.7 years) and 54.2% were male (mirogabalin, 56.1%; placebo, 52.3%). Mirogabalin elicited a greater change from baseline in the weekly ADPS vs. placebo at week 14: least-squares mean difference (95% confidence interval) vs. placebo - 0.39 (- 0.74, - 0.04), p = 0.0301. PGIC, ADSIS, and EQ-5D-5L data reflected significantly better improvements for patients receiving mirogabalin vs. placebo. The incidence of TEAEs was 75.0% and 75.1% in the mirogabalin and placebo groups, respectively. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate, and the incidence of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation was 2.6% in the mirogabalin group and 1.5% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Although the effect size of mirogabalin was reduced due to the placebo effect, mirogabalin is a safe and effective treatment option for Chinese patients with DPNP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04094662.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Occlusal and percussion pain may manifest occasionally following endodontic treatment, influencing retreatment decisions. Two cases of periapical neuropathic pain, classified as post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain according to the International Classification of Orofacial Pain, are presented. Although mirogabalin is effective in managing neuropathic pain, there is a lack of clinical reports on its use for occasional post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain after endodontic treatment. These cases highlight clinical symptoms and successful treatment with mirogabalin for post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain after endodontic treatment, providing clinicians a "take-away" lesson for improving patient condition. METHODS: The patients, referred by their primary dentist due to postendodontic abnormal pain, found no relief with antibiotics or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Although no findings including swelling or periapical radiolucency were observed around the tooth, they experienced occlusal and percussion pain. Local anesthetic testing showed that the pain originated from the peripheral area around the tooth rather than from central sensitization. Dental radiography and cone-beam computed tomography revealed no abnormal findings. Root canal retreatment was performed by a specialist in endodontic treatment. Although endodontic retreatment drastically decreased visual analog scale pain score, pain persisted. Based on the International Classification of Orofacial Pain criteria, diseases other than post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain were excluded. Mirogabalin (10 mg/d) was prescribed once daily before bedtime. RESULTS: Visual analog scale scores gradually and drastically decreased 2 weeks after mirogabalin therapy. Several months later, no recurrence of postendodontic pain was observed after tapering off and discontinuing mirogabalin. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the possibility of a new treatment method for post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain after endodontic treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) are challenging and often intractable complex medical conditions, with a substantial impact on the quality of life. Mirogabalin, a novel voltage-gated Ca2+ channel α2δ ligand, was approved for the indication of DPNP and PHN. However, the time course of effects has not yet been clarified.We aimed to establish pharmacodynamic and placebo effect models of mirogabalin and pregabalin in DPNP and PHN, and to quantitatively compare the efficacy characteristics (maximum efficacy, onset time, and other pharmacodynamic parameters) and safety of mirogabalin and pregabalin. Public databases were comprehensively searched for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. A model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was developed to describe the time course of drug efficacy and placebo effects. Adverse events were compared using a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Sixteen studies including 5,147 participants were eligible for this study. The placebo effect was relatively high and gradually increased with time, and it required at least eight weeks to reach a plateau. The pharmacodynamic model revealed that the maximum pure efficacy for mirogabalin and pregabalin was approximately -7.85 % and -8.86 %, respectively; the efficacy of mirogabalin to relieve DPNP and PHN was not superior to that of pregabalin, and both drugs had similar safety. While the rate constant of the onset rate of pregabalin was approximately thrice as high as that of mirogabalin. In addition, the baseline level of pain was an important factor affecting pregabalin efficacy. These findings are helpful in evaluating the clinical extension value of mirogabalin. They suggest that the high placebo effect and the baseline level of pain should be considered when grouping patients in future research and development of voltage-gated Ca2+ channel neuroanalgesic.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For chronic pain after thoracic surgery, optimal timing of its diagnosis and effective treatment remains unresolved, although several treatment options are currently available. We examined the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin, in combination with conventional pain therapy (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or acetaminophen), for treating peripheral neuropathic pain (NeP) after thoracic surgery. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study, patients with peripheral NeP were randomly assigned 1:1 to mirogabalin as add-on to conventional therapy or conventional treatment alone. RESULTS: Of 131 patients of consent obtained, 128 were randomized (mirogabalin add-on group, 63 patients; conventional treatment group, 65 patients). The least squares mean changes (95% confidence interval [CI]) in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for pain intensity at rest from baseline to Week 8 (primary endpoint) were - 51.3 (- 54.9, - 47.7) mm in the mirogabalin add-on group and - 47.7 (- 51.2, - 44.2) mm in the conventional group (between-group difference: - 3.6 [95% CI: - 8.7, 1.5], P = 0.161). However, in patients with Self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) score (used for the screening of NeP) ≥ 12 at baseline, the greater the S-LANSS score at baseline, the greater the decrease in VAS score in the mirogabalin add-on group, while no such trend was observed in the conventional treatment group (post hoc analysis). This between-group difference in trends was statistically significant (interaction P value = 0.014). Chronic pain was recorded in 7.9% vs. 16.9% of patients (P = 0.171) at Week 12 in the mirogabalin add-on vs. conventional treatment groups, respectively. Regarding activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL), changes in Pain Disability Assessment Scale score and the EQ-5D-5L index value from baseline to Week 8 showed significant improvement in the mirogabalin add-on group vs. conventional treatment group (P < 0.001). The most common adverse events (AEs) in the mirogabalin add-on group were dizziness (12.7%), somnolence (7.9%), and urticaria (3.2%). Most AEs were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of mirogabalin to conventional therapy did not result in significant improvement in pain intensity based on VAS scores, but did result in significant improvement in ADL and QOL in patients with peripheral NeP after thoracic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs071200053 (registered 17/11/2020).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is drug-resistant to available analgesics and therefore novel treatment options for this debilitating clinical condition are urgently needed. Recently, two drug candidates, namely mirogabalin and cebranopadol have become a subject of interest because of their potential utility as analgesics for chronic pain treatment. However, they have not been investigated thoroughly in some types of neuropathic pain, both in humans and experimental animals. METHODS: This study used the von Frey test, the hot plate test and the two-plate thermal place preference test supported by image analysis and machine learning to assess the effect of intraperitoneal mirogabalin and subcutaneous cebranopadol on mechanical and thermal nociceptive threshold in mouse models of neuropathic pain induced by streptozotocin, paclitaxel and oxaliplatin. RESULTS: Mirogabalin and cebranopadol effectively attenuated tactile allodynia in models of neuropathic pain induced by streptozotocin and paclitaxel. Cebranopadol was more effective than mirogabalin in this respect. Both drugs also elevated the heat nociceptive threshold in mice. In the oxaliplatin model, cebranopadol and mirogabalin reduced cold-exacerbated pain. CONCLUSIONS: Since mirogabalin and cebranopadol are effective in animal models of neuropathic pain, they seem to be promising novel therapies for various types of neuropathic pain in patients, in particular those who are resistant to available analgesics.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a painful, dose-limiting adverse effect of commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. The purpose of this exploratory study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin in patients with moderate to severe CIPN during chemotherapy and the effects of 12 weeks' intervention on chemotherapy completion and CIPN severity. METHODS: Patients experiencing moderate to severe CIPN while undergoing oxaliplatin- or taxane-containing chemotherapy for colorectal, gastric, non-small-cell lung, or breast cancer received mirogabalin at between 5 and 15 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was change in numeric rating scale (NRS) score for pain from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints included NRS scores for tingling and sleep, completion of chemotherapy, severity of CIPN, and quality of life (QOL) scores. The safety endpoint was incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Of 58 patients who consented to participation, 52 were eligible and constituted the full analysis set and safety analysis set. From baseline to week 12 (last observation carried forward [LOCF]), NRS score decreased by 30.9%: mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]), - 1.7 (- 2.4 to - 1.0) (p < 0.001). Patients with baseline NRS of ≥ 6 experienced a 44.0% reduction in score from baseline to week 12 (LOCF): mean change (95% CI), - 3.3 (- 5.0 to - 1.5) (p = 0.002). Chemotherapy was discontinued in 18 (34.6%) patients; CIPN led to discontinuation in only 2 (3.8%). There was no notable worsening of CIPN severity in terms of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade or Modified Total Neuropathy Score-reduced, although use of pain medications during chemotherapy might cause worsening of CIPN due to underestimation of subjective symptoms. QOL score based on the EuroQol five-dimensional descriptive system did not worsen during the 12 weeks. Thirty-one percent of patients experienced adverse drug reactions, and the most common event was somnolence (13.5%). Serious adverse events and death occurred in 3 patients and 1 patient, respectively; however, they were unrelated to mirogabalin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention with mirogabalin during chemotherapy may be effective and safe for cancer patients with moderate to severe CIPN. It can contribute to completion of chemotherapy without worsening of CIPN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031210101, registered 20/5/2021).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative trigeminal neuropathy may be seen after surgery for middle and posterior cranial fossa lesions. Although neuropathic pain is a cause of reduced quality of life, global consensus on postoperative pain management is lacking. Mirogabalin besylate is a selective ligand for the α2δ subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. Although mirogabalin has been used for patients with postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, few reports have assessed the effect on postsurgical neuropathy. In this report, we describe a clinical effectiveness of mirogabalin for trigeminal neuropathy after skull base surgery. CASE DESCRIPTION: Case 1: A 51-year-old female with right trigeminal schwannoma was operated on via the anterior transpetrosal approach. She had tingling and numb feelings in the right face postoperatively. Mirogabalin was orally administered after the operation. Her continuous facial numbness immediately improved. Case 2: A 55-year-old female with left middle fossa base meningioma extending into the infratemporal fossa was operated on via the infratemporal fossa approach. She had a tingling feeling in the left face postoperatively. Mirogabalin was orally administered for this symptom after the operation, which gradually improved. CONCLUSIONS: Mirogabalin may show significant pain relief for patients with trigeminal neuropathy after skull base surgery. Further studies using a larger number of patients are warranted to confirm these findings.

RESUMEN

Neuropathic pain is a chronic condition that significantly reduces the quality of life of many patients as a result of ineffective pain relief therapy. For that reason, looking for new analgesics remains an important issue. Mirogabalin is a new gabapentinoid that is a specific ligand for the α2σ-1 and α2σ-2 subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels. In the present study, we compared the analgesic effect of pregabalin and mirogabalin in a neuropathic pain chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve in a mouse model. The main purpose of our study was to determine the effectiveness of mirogabalin administered both once and repeatedly and to explain how the drug influences highly activated cells at the spinal cord level in neuropathy. We also sought to understand whether mirogabalin modulates the selected intracellular pathways (p38MAPK, ERK, JNK) and chemokines (CCL2, CCL5) important for nociceptive transmission, which is crucial information from a clinical perspective. First, our study provides evidence that a single mirogabalin administration diminishes tactile hypersensitivity more effectively than pregabalin. Second, research shows that several indirect mechanisms may be responsible for the beneficial analgesic effect of mirogabalin. This study reports that repeated intraperitoneally (i.p.) mirogabalin administration strongly prevents spinal microglia/macrophage activation evoked by nerve injury, slightly suppresses astroglia and neutrophil infiltration, and reduces the p38MAPK levels associated with neuropathic pain, as measured on Day 7. Moreover, mirogabalin strongly diminished the levels of the pronociceptive chemokines CCL2 and CCL5. Our results indicate that mirogabalin may represent a new strategy for the effective pharmacotherapy of neuropathic pain.

RESUMEN

This single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-group, 2-stage crossover trial evaluated the bioequivalence of 15 mg of mirogabalin as orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) with conventional mirogabalin tablets in healthy Japanese men. The trial involved two studies: in Study 1, the ODT formulation was taken without water, and in Study 2, the ODT formulation was taken with water. The conventional tablet was taken with water in both studies. We investigated the pharmacokinetic parameters and bioequivalence of the 2 formulations, including the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable time. The plasma concentrations of mirogabalin were determined by a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method. A total of 72 participants were enrolled and completed the trial. The geometric least-squares mean ratios of maximum plasma concentration of the ODT formulation to the conventional formulation were within the prespecified bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25 (Study 1, 0.995; Study 2, 1.009), as was the area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable time (Study 1, 1.023; Study 2, 1.035). No serious adverse events were observed. In conclusion, mirogabalin 15-mg ODTs, either with or without water, were bioequivalent to conventional 15-mg tablets.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

External compression headaches are relatively rare. However, the consultation rate is low and the disease is not well recognized. This report describes a patient who developed intolerable headaches after wearing a helmet at a construction site and required approximately seven months of leave from work. The patient continued to wear the helmet even after the onset of an external compression headache, which worsened. In particular, acute drug treatment is ineffective, resulting in the need for long-term absence. Based on the discrepancy between prevalence and consultation rates, educating occupational workers and workplaces requiring helmet use for external compression headaches is essential.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Central neuropathic pain (CNeP) is difficult to treat and has diverse etiology, including spinal cord injury (CNePSCI), Parkinson's disease (CNePPD), and central post-stroke pain (CPSP). The safety and efficacy of mirogabalin have been demonstrated in short-term trials, including patients with CNePSCI. The objective of our study was to confirm the safety/efficacy of mirogabalin in patients with CNePPD and CPSP, and obtain long-term data for CNePSCI. METHODS: This 52-week, open-label extension of a previous randomized controlled study was conducted across Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Patients with CNePSCI, CNePPD, or CPSP received twice daily (BID) 5-10 mg mirogabalin for a 4-week titration period, after which the dosage was maintained for 47 weeks at a maximum of 15 mg BID, followed by a 1-week taper period receiving the same dose but only administered once daily. The primary endpoint was safety, assessed primarily by incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy was assessed in a post hoc analysis of data obtained by the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). RESULTS: Of the 210 patients enrolled, 106, 94, and 10 had CNePSCI, CPSP, and CNePPD, respectively. The mean overall age of patients was 62.9 years, and most patients were male and of Japanese ethnicity. TEAEs occurred in 84.8% of patients, the most common being somnolence (16.7%), peripheral edema (12.4%), edema (11.4%), nasopharyngitis (11.0%), and dizziness (7.6%). Most TEAEs were mild. Severe and serious TEAEs occurred in 6.2% and 13.3% of patients, respectively. All patient groups experienced reductions in SF-MPQ visual analog scores for pain: mean ± standard deviation changes from baseline at week 52 were -2.3 ± 21.13 mm (CNePSCI), -17.0 ± 24.99 mm (CPSP), and -17.1 ± 35.32 mm (CNePPD). CONCLUSION: Mirogabalin was generally safe, well tolerated, and effective for treatment of CNeP in this long-term study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03901352.

RESUMEN

Introduction: We often treat patients with peripheral neuropathic pain due to spine diseases with mirogabalin as an alternative to pregabalin because of adverse events or insufficient efficacy associated with pregabalin treatment. However, there have been few reports on the safety and efficacy of mirogabalin in such cases. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching from pregabalin to mirogabalin in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain due to spine diseases. Methods: Between January 2019 and July 2021, we treated 106 patients (47 men and 59 women) with peripheral neuropathic pain due to spine diseases. All patients had switched from pregabalin to mirogabalin due to adverse events or lack of efficacy. We evaluated the retention rate, incidence of adverse events, and response rate of mirogabalin during the treatment course. Results: The mean age of the patients was 67.5 years (range, 33-93 years), and the average dose of mirogabalin was 13.8 mg (range, 2.5-30 mg) at the final follow-up. The average duration of mirogabalin treatment was 148.7 days (range, 3-463 days). The retention rate of mirogabalin was 78.3%, the incidence of adverse events after mirogabalin administration was 28.3%, and the response rate of mirogabalin was 66%. Somnolence with pregabalin or mirogabalin administration in the mirogabalin discontinuation group was increased compared with that in the mirogabalin continuation group (pregabalin: 52.2% vs. 19.3%, mirogabalin: 26.1% vs. 7.2%). The patients who responded to mirogabalin had a lower average age, higher retention rate, and longer drug administration period than those who did not respond to it. Conclusions: This study indicated that mirogabalin treatment might be continued in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain due to spinal diseases who could not continue pregabalin treatment.

RESUMEN

Mirogabalin is a novel gabapentinoid drug with a hydrophobic bicyclo substituent on the γ-aminobutyric acid moiety that targets the voltage-gated calcium channel subunit α2δ1. Here, to reveal the mirogabalin recognition mechanisms of α2δ1, we present structures of recombinant human α2δ1 with and without mirogabalin analyzed by cryo-electron microscopy. These structures show the binding of mirogabalin to the previously reported gabapentinoid binding site, which is the extracellular dCache_1 domain containing a conserved amino acid binding motif. A slight conformational change occurs around the residues positioned close to the hydrophobic group of mirogabalin. Mutagenesis binding assays identified that residues in the hydrophobic interaction region, in addition to several amino acid binding motif residues around the amino and carboxyl groups of mirogabalin, are critical for mirogabalin binding. The A215L mutation introduced to decrease the hydrophobic pocket volume predictably suppressed mirogabalin binding and promoted the binding of another ligand, L-Leu, with a smaller hydrophobic substituent than mirogabalin. Alterations of residues in the hydrophobic interaction region of α2δ1 to those of the α2δ2, α2δ3, and α2δ4 isoforms, of which α2δ3 and α2δ4 are gabapentin-insensitive, suppressed the binding of mirogabalin. These results support the importance of hydrophobic interactions in α2δ1 ligand recognition.

Asunto(s)