Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(1)2023 Dec 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38202244

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to analyze parameters influencing early and late mortality after concomitant valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, using early and long-term information from an institutionally available data registry, and to discuss the results in relation to the current treatment strategies and perspectives. METHODS: The study population consisted of 294 patients after combined valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis and CABG surgery. RESULTS: There were 201 men (68.4%) and 93 women (31.6%). Concurrent to the coronary artery bypass grafting, 238 patients (80.9%) underwent aortic-, 46 patients (15.6%) mitral- and 10 patients (3.4%) doublevalve replacement. Cumulative duration of follow up was 1007 patient-years (py) with a maximum of 94 months and was completed in 92.2% (271 cases). Overall hospital mortality (30 days) rate was 6.5% (n = 19). It was significantly higher in patients of female gender, older than 70 y, in those suffering preoperative myocardial infarction, presenting with an additive EuroScore > 8 and being hemodynamically unstable after the operation. Cumulative survival rate at 7.6 y was 78.6%. Determinants of prolonged survival were male gender, age at operation < 70 y, preoperative sinus rhythm, normal renal function, additive EuroScore < 8 and the use of internal thoracic artery for grafting. Subsequent multivariate analysis revealed preoperative atrial fibrillation (HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 0.82-5.44, p: 0.01) and risk group of ES > 8 (HR: 3.63, 95% CI: 1.45-9.07, p < 0.01) as independent predictors for lower long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital mortality (30 d) was nearly 2.5-fold higher in female and/or older than 70 y patients. Preoperative atrial fibrillation and/ or a calculated ES > 8 were independent predisposing factors of late mortality for combined VR and CABG surgery. Tailoring the approach, with the employment of the newest techniques and hybrid procedures, to the individual patient clinical profile enables favorable outcomes for concomitant valvular disease and CAD, especially in high-risk patients.

2.
Cureus ; 14(5): e25050, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35719773

RESUMEN

Purpose Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a subcutaneous infection of the sacrococcygeal region due to entrapment of hair and/or debris. International guidelines recommend minimally invasive techniques and flap techniques. A Dutch guideline for the treatment of PSD is not available and this may lead to practice variation. The aim of this study was to perform a national survey on the surgical treatment of PSD in the Netherlands. Method An online survey was sent by e-mail to all surgeons and surgical residents of the Dutch Association for Surgeons. Respondents were asked to reflect on their preferences in the treatment of PSD, their perceived satisfaction with this treatment, and the need for national guidelines. Results A total of 819 (48.6%) of 1684 invitees responded to the survey, of whom 615 (37%) met the inclusion criteria. Traditional excision techniques were most frequently performed for all types of PSD (50.7%) followed by flap techniques (22.6%) and minimally invasive techniques (22%). Only 22.6% of the participants were satisfied with the current treatment and 82% supported the development of a national guideline. Conclusion Traditional excision techniques are most frequently performed for PSD in the Netherlands but the majority of surgeons and surgical residents are not satisfied with the current treatment. There is a demand for a national guideline.

3.
World J Urol ; 38(12): 3235-3244, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32124019

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Assessing medium-term functional results of a novel minimally-invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPO with the second generation of the temporary implantable nitinol device (iTind; Medi-Tate Ltd®, Israel): 2-year follow-up of a single-arm, prospective, international multicenter study. Further, we aimed to identify preoperative baseline parameters predicting response to iTind treatment. METHODS: Following local ethical committee approval in every participating centre, 81 men with symptomatic BPO (IPSS ≥ 10, peak urinary flow < 12 ml/s, and prostate volume < 75 ml) were enrolled in this study. Patients with PVR > 250 ml, obstructive median lobe, previous prostatic surgery, confounding bladder or sphincter dysfunction based on medical history, active urinary infection and unable to interrupt antithrombotic or antiplatelet treatment were exclusion criteria. A wash-out period of 1 month for alpha-blockers and 6 months for 5-ARIs was mandatory to avoid confounders. The procedure was performed as previously described: implantation under light sedation and removal 5-7 days later with topical sedation. Patients were assessed for perioperative results including OR-time, pain (VAS) and complications (Clavien-Dindo-Grading System); and for functional results (PVR, Qmax, IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) including sexual and ejaculatory function using two yes/no questions. Follow-up assessments were done at 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: Of the 81 patients initially enrolled in this study, follow-up included 67 men at 1 year and 51 men at 2 years. For the 51 men included in the present analysis, the median age was 65 years, median prostate volume 37 ml (range 16-65 ml). Baseline values for IPSS and QoL were 20.51 ± 4.58, 3.96 ± 0.87. Qmax and PVR were 7.62 ± 2.25 ml/s and 65.84 ± 38.46, respectively. No intraoperative complications were observed and the average pain level recorded on the visual analogue scale (VAS) was 3.2 ± 1.6. A significant reduction in symptoms and improvement in urinary flow was observed (p < 0.0001) at all assessment points: IPSS-score and QoL improved to 8.51 ± 5.51 and 1.76 ± 1.32, respectively; and Qmax increased to 16.00 ± 7.43 ml/s. None of the patients who were previously sexually active reported a deterioration in sexual or ejaculatory functions according to two yes/no questions over the follow-up period. Excluding the patients lost at follow-up, five patients underwent surgery between 12 and 24 months. Upon investigation, it was discovered that four of the five patients requiring surgery had median lobes and were protocol deviators. A failure analysis was carried out for all 81 patients in order to identify baseline parameters that could predict treatment failure. 58.33% of patients in the failure group (7 out of 12) had median lobes which was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.0001). None of the other preoperative variables (age, prostate volume, IPSS scores, Qmax, PVR, and PSA) were found to predict response to iTind treatment. CONCLUSION: iTind treatment for BPO-related LUTS showed marked and durable reduction in symptoms and improvement of functional parameters and quality of life at 24 months of follow-up. It was found that median lobe may predict failure of iTind treatment. According to the yes/no questions, ejaculatory and sexual functions do not seem to be effected following treatment, however, this finding must be supported with further studies using the accepted tools.


Asunto(s)
Aleaciones , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Prótesis e Implantes , Adulto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
4.
Lasers Surg Med ; 52(5): 419-423, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31475737

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: On the basis of reported immediate and short-term excruciating pain by patients in the post-procedural period of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) in our clinic, we present our initial clinical experience with a novel combi-therapy using a combination of CT-guided PLDD and CT-guided epidural nerve blocks, which proved effective in managing the pain. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients who met the criteria for PLDD, underwent treatment for lumbar discogenic radiculopathy between 2014 and 2017. Fifty-five percent of the patients were males and 45% were females with a mean age of 46.25 years. Ninety-five patients underwent one level PLDD and five patients two-level PLDD procedures. CT-guided epidural nerve block with a combination of Bupivacaine, Lignocaine, and Kenalog was used in a 3× procedure separated by a 1-week interval. The first nerve block was given the same day, immediately after the PLDD procedure. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain was used during the pre-procedure and post-procedure periods. RESULTS: Among the patients who underwent one level PLDD, 88 had L4-L5 levels, 5 had L5-S1 levels and 2 had L3-L4 levels. L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels were the most common two-level PLDD locations in seven patients. Five patients in our study subsequently underwent open surgical treatment. All patients reported immediate pain relief, which was sustained after the procedure. The average pre-procedure VAS score was 7.6 (range from 5 to 8.2) and the VAS score immediately after the procedure was on average 0.5 (ranging from 0 to 2). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this initial experience using a combi-therapy of CT-guided PLDD and CT-guided epidural nerve block have shown the benefits of this novel approach, offering significant immediate pain relief in the post-procedural phase, favorable outcomes in the short to mid-term and a significantly reduced rate of re-surgery (7%) compared with the use of only CT-guided PLDD. Lasers Surg Med 00:1-5, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Terapia por Láser , Vértebras Lumbares , Bloqueo Nervioso , Radiculopatía/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiculopatía/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiculopatía/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
J Cancer ; 9(5): 816-833, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29581760

RESUMEN

We use pulmonary interventional procedures for the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases either for benign or malignant lesions. Flexible bronchoscopy with or without radial endobronchial ultrasound, convex-probe endobronchial ultrasound and electromagnetic navigation are procedures performed in centers with experience in diagnostic pulmonary medicine. The method of sedation and ventilation is very important in order to avoid or handle with success complications. Proper respiration during pulmonary (or other interventional) procedures is a key factor. Apart from the proper sedation method we have to choose the proper ventilation method which decides respiratory movement. Superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation (SHFJV) is supposed to be safe and effective in clinical practice. Although this perception is commonly accepted, there is no study proving its safety on the basic of reliable data. We analyzed the data of 100 patients in different interventional settings (bronchoscopy with or without navigational approach, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) or intracardiac catheterization) using nasal SHFJV. Mainly analyzed were capillary ABG-Data at the beginning and end of the intervention under sedation. The aim was to analyze if a risk scenario for the patient by using the nasal SHFJV can be derived by measuring the changes of pCO2, pO2, cBase Excess, cHCO3 and PH. Due to our data we conclude that this method of ventilation can be easily and safely used in interventional medicine for patients with all kind of comorbidities such as; chronic respiratory disease, lung cancer, interstitial lung disease, structural heart disease and heart failure.

6.
Spine J ; 18(8): 1338-1346, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29292235

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is one of minimally invasive techniques to treat patients with low back and radiating pain resulting from lumbosacral disc herniation (LDH). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of PELD to treat patients with low back and radicular pain due to LDH and to investigate which clinical and radiological variables have the ability to predict clinical outcome after PELD. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a retrospective study design carried out at a spine hospital. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample comprised 75 patients who had undergone PELD for treatment of low back and radiating leg pain resulting from LDH and who could be followed up for at least 12 months. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Clinical outcomes were assessed using numeric rating scale for back and radiating leg pain (NRS back and leg), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria at 1 month (short-term follow-up) and at least 12 months (long-term follow-up) after PELD. METHODS: The patients were divided into successful and unsuccessful outcome groups according to improvement of NRS back, NRS leg, and ODI (%) at long-term follow-up period. We compared the various clinical and radiological variables between the two groups to identify which variables could be the prognostic factors of clinical outcomes of PELD. This analysis was performed in terms of whole population, the subgroup of dominant back pain, and the subgroup of dominant leg pain, respectively. RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed in NRS back, NRS leg, ODI (%), and modified MacNab criteria at short-term and long-term follow-up after PELD. Positive straight leg raising (SLR) was significantly related to successful outcome as to NRS leg and ODI (%), and longer pain duration also showed significant relationship with unsuccessful outcomes as to NRS leg in whole population. Positive SLR had significant relationship with successful NRS leg as well as successful ODI (%) in the subgroup of dominant leg pain. CONCLUSIONS: PELD was an effective treatment in patients with back and leg pain due to LDH. Positive SLR had the predictive ability to successful reduction of radiating leg pain and successful functional improvement. Longer pain duration was also related to unsuccessful reduction of radiating leg pain.


Asunto(s)
Discectomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Región Lumbosacra/diagnóstico por imagen , Región Lumbosacra/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía
7.
Spine J ; 15(5): 857-65, 2015 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25614151

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) is a minimally invasive treatment for lumbar disc herniation, with Food and Drug Administration approval since 1991. However, no randomized trial comparing PLDD to conventional treatment has been performed. PURPOSE: In this trial, we assessed the effectiveness of a strategy of PLDD as compared with conventional surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This randomized prospective trial with a noninferiority design was carried out in two academic and six teaching hospitals in the Netherlands according to an intent-to-treat protocol with full institutional review board approval. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred fifteen eligible surgical candidates, with sciatica from a disc herniation smaller than one-third of the spinal canal, were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures for this trial were the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for sciatica, visual analog scores for back and leg pain, and the patient's report of perceived recovery. METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated to PLDD (n=57) or conventional surgery (n=58). Blinding was impossible because of the nature of the interventions. This study was funded by the Healthcare Insurance Board of the Netherlands. RESULTS: The primary outcome, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, showed noninferiority of PLDD at 8 (-0.1; [95% confidence interval (CI), -2.3 to 2.1]) and 52 weeks (-1.1; 95% CI, -3.4 to 1.1) compared with conventional surgery. There was, however, a higher speed of recovery in favor of conventional surgery (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.97]). The number of reoperations was significantly less in the conventional surgery group (38% vs. 16%). Overall, a strategy of PLDD, with delayed surgery if needed, resulted in noninferior outcomes at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year, a strategy of PLDD, followed by surgery if needed, resulted in noninferior outcomes compared with surgery.


Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Discectomía/métodos , Ciática/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Discectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos
8.
J Thorac Dis ; 6 Suppl 1: S2-6, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24672695

RESUMEN

The primary issues must be discussed regarding the decision making of treating a patient with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD), are the appropriateness of revascularization and the method which will be applied. The criteria will be the symptoms, the evidence of ischemia and the anatomical complexity of the coronary bed. Main indications are persistence of symptoms, despite oral medical treatment and the prognosis of any intervention. The prognosis is based on left ventricular function, on the number of coronary arteries with significant stenosis and the ischemic burden. For patients with symptoms and no evidence of ischemia, there is no benefit from revascularization. If ischemia is proven, revascularization is beneficial. If revascularization is decided, the next important issue must be taken under consideration is the choice of the appropriate method to be applied, surgical or interventional approach. Current treatment options will be presented.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA