RESUMEN

Introduction: Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) is a difficult to treat disease. The liver is the primary site of metastasis in most patients, though uveal melanoma spreads widely in advanced disease. The only FDA approved immunotherapy medication for metastatic uveal melanoma is the HLA-A02:01 restricted bispecific T cell engager drug, Tebentafusp. Checkpoint inhibitor strategies and combination approaches have been tried with some limited success. We describe our experience treating patients at the University of Minnesota. Methods: Patients were included if they had biopsy-confirmed mUM. Twenty-five (25) patients meeting the criteria were identified. Medical records were reviewed and data extracted for patient baseline characteristics and response to treatments. Results: Median time to metastasis from the time of local therapy to the eye was 14.2 months (IQR; 9.3-22.0), and first site of metastasis was liver in 92% of patients. Two patients (8%) did not receive systemic therapy or radiation therapy for metastatic disease. Twenty-three (92%) patients received systemic therapy, 13 patients (52%) received ipilimumab-nivolumab as the first-line, while 4 patients (16%) received pembrolizumab. Landmark survival analysis by receipt of systemic therapy and radiation therapy treatments within 6 months of biopsy confirmed diagnosis is shown. Twenty patients (80%) received systemic therapy within 6 months of mUM diagnosis. Thirteen patients (52%) received liver directed radiation therapy within 6 months of mUM diagnosis. Discussion: Within our cohort, there was no overall survival benefit for patients receiving treatment of metastatic disease within 6 months of mUM diagnosis, versus those electing later or no treatment at all. There was remarkable clinical activity of ipilimumab and nivolumab in a subset of patients with mUM, in agreement with prior studies, and metastatic PD-L1 positive tumors were associated with a prolonged survival.

RESUMEN

Patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) have a poor prognosis, and few appropriate medications are available. Tebentafusp is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for mUM recently. However, the real efficacy and safety of tebentafusp are still unclear. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 20, 2024. The research was reported based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. We used random effects models to aggregate data on the response rates and adverse events of tebentafusp therapy. Six studies met the inclusion criteria with a total sample of 589 participants. The pooled objective response rate was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.05-0.12), and pooled disease control rate was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.44-0.57). The overall incidence was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00) for any grade adverse events, 0.50 (95% CI: 0.41-0.59) for grade 3-4 adverse events, and 0.01 (95% CI: 0-0.03) for discontinuation due to adverse events. Tebentafusp exhibits promising treatment outcomes for mUM patients. Although accompanied with a common occurrence of adverse events, which can typically be managed and controlled. Future research is necessary for substantiating these findings and refining guidelines for management of mUM.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: To report a case of metastatic uveal melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibition in which serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was assessed throughout treatment. Observations: A 33-year-old man was diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma and initially had progression of disease following hepatic embolization and nivolumab/ipilimumab. At the time, plasma ctDNA GNA11 and SF3B1 were measurable and repeat ctDNA showed increased variant allele frequency following further progression of disease on vorinostat. Following additional nivolumab/ipilimumab, radiographic response was noted and repeat ctDNA became undetectable and remained so at 27 months follow up. Conclusions and importance: Clearance of cell free DNA in metastatic uveal melanoma may be associated with radiographic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

RESUMEN

AIMS: The MAPK pathway is constitutively activated in uveal melanoma (UM). Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886), a MEK inhibitor, has shown limited activity as monotherapy in metastatic UM. Pre-clinical studies support synergistic cytotoxic activity for MEK inhibitors combined with taxanes, and here we sought to assess the clinical efficacy of combining selumetinib and paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with metastatic UM who had not received prior chemotherapy were randomised to selumetinib alone, or combined with paclitaxel with or without interruption in selumetinib two days before paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). After amendment, the combination arms were combined for analysis and the sample size adjusted to detect a hazard ratio (HR): 0.55, 80% power at 1-sided 5% significance level. RESULTS: The median PFS in the combination arms was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.8 - 5.6) compared with 3.4 months (2.0 - 3.9) in the selumetinib arm (HR 0.62 [90% CI 0.41 - 0.92], 1-sided p-value = 0.022). ORR was 14% and 4% in the combination and monotherapy arms respectively. Median OS was 9 months for the combination and was not significantly different from selumetinib alone (10 months) with HR of 0.98 [90% CI 0.58 - 1.66], 1-sided p-value = 0.469. Toxicity was in keeping with the known profiles of the agents involved. CONCLUSIONS: SelPac met its primary endpoint, demonstrating an improvement in PFS for combination selumetinib and paclitaxel. No improvement in OS was observed, and the modest improvement in PFS is not practice changing.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tebentafusp demonstrated a superior overall survival (OS) benefit [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51] compared to investigator's choice (82% pembrolizumab) in a randomized, phase III trial (IMCgp100-202; N = 378) in untreated metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). The 1-year OS rates for tebentafusp and pembrolizumab were 73% and 59%, respectively. In the single-arm GEM1402 (N = 52), the 1-year OS rate for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N+I) in mUM was 52%. Due to limitations in conducting randomized trials in mUM, we compared OS on tebentafusp or pembrolizumab (IMCgp100-202) to N+I (GEM1402) in untreated mUM using propensity scoring methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analyses were adjusted using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), balancing age, sex, baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), baseline alkaline phosphatase, disease location, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, and time from primary diagnosis to metastasis. OS was assessed using IPT-weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. Sensitivity analyses using alternative missing data and weights methods were conducted. RESULTS: The primary IPTW analysis included 240 of 252 patients randomized to tebentafusp from IMCgp100-202 and 45 of 52 N+I-treated patients from GEM-1402. Key baseline covariates, including LDH, were generally well balanced before weighting. The IPTW-adjusted OS favored tebentafusp, HR 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.78]; 1-year OS was 73% for tebentafusp versus 50% for N+I. Sensitivity analyses showed consistent superior OS for tebentafusp with all IPTW HRs ≤0.61. IPTW analysis of pembrolizumab versus N+I showed no significant difference in OS (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.50-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Tebentafusp was previously shown to provide an OS benefit compared to checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy in untreated mUM. Propensity score analysis demonstrated a similar OS benefit for tebentafusp compared with N+I. These data further support tebentafusp as the standard of care in previously untreated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A∗02:01+ adult patients with mUM.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Uveal melanoma is a poor prognosis cancer. Ergolide, a sesquiterpene lactone isolated from Inula Brittanica, exerts anti-cancer properties. The objective of this study was to 1) evaluate whether ergolide reduced metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) cell survival/viability in vitro and in vivo; and 2) to understand the molecular mechanism of ergolide action. Methods: Ergolide bioactivity was screened via long-term proliferation assay in UM/MUM cells and in zebrafish MUM xenograft models. Mass spectrometry profiled proteins modulated by ergolide within whole cell or extracellular vesicle (EVs) lysates of the OMM2.5 MUM cell line. Protein expression was analyzed by immunoblots and correlation analyses to UM patient survival used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data. Results: Ergolide treatment resulted in significant, dose-dependent reductions (48.5 to 99.9%; p<0.0001) in OMM2.5 cell survival in vitro and of normalized primary zebrafish xenograft fluorescence (56%; p<0.0001) in vivo, compared to vehicle controls. Proteome-profiling of ergolide-treated OMM2.5 cells, identified 5023 proteins, with 52 and 55 proteins significantly altered at 4 and 24 hours, respectively ( p<0.05; fold-change >1.2). Immunoblotting of heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1) and growth/differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) corroborated the proteomic data. Additional proteomics of EVs isolated from OMM2.5 cells treated with ergolide, detected 2931 proteins. There was a large overlap with EV proteins annotated within the Vesiclepedia compendium. Within the differentially expressed proteins, the proteasomal pathway was primarily altered. Interestingly, BRCA2 and CDKN1A Interacting Protein (BCCIP) and Chitinase Domain Containing 1 (CHID1), were the only proteins significantly differentially expressed by ergolide in both the OMM2.5 cellular and EV isolates and they displayed inverse differential expression in the cells versus the EVs. Conclusions: Ergolide is a novel, promising anti-proliferative agent for UM/MUM. Proteomic profiling of OMM2.5 cellular/EV lysates identified candidate pathways elucidating the action of ergolide and putative biomarkers of UM, that require further examination.

The most common form of adult eye cancer is uveal melanoma (UM). Once UM cancer cells spread to organs in the rest of the body, metastatic UM (MUM), there is a poor prognosis for patients with only one approved drug treatment. Hence, it is vital to better understand the cellular and extracellular proteins that regulate UM pathology in order to uncover biomarkers of disease and therapeutic targets. In this original study, we demonstrate a compound called ergolide is capable of severely reducing the metabolic activity and growth of UM cancer cells, grown as isolated monolayers. Ergolide was also able to reduce the growth of human MUM cells growing as tumors in transplanted zebrafish larvae. We identify that ergolide alters specific proteins found in the human UM cells. These proteins once analyzed in detail offer opportunities to understand how new treatment strategies can be developed for UM.

RESUMEN

The FDA granted orphan drug designation to darovasertib, a first-in-class oral, small molecular inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC), for the treatment of uveal melanoma, on 2 May 2022. Primary uveal melanoma has a high risk of progressing to metastatic uveal melanoma, with a poor prognosis. The activation of the PKC and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways play an essential role in the pathogenesis of uveal melanoma, and mutations in the G protein subunit alpha q (GNAQ), and G protein subunit alpha11 (GNA11) genes are considered early events in the development of uveal melanoma. Compared to other PKC inhibitors, such as sotrastaurin and enzastaurin, darovasertib is significantly more potent in inhibiting conventional (α, ß) and novel (δ, ϵ, η, θ) PKC proteins and has a better tolerability and safety profile. Current Phase I/II clinical trials indicated that darovasertib, combined with the Mitogen-activated protein kinase/Extracellular (MEK) inhibitors, binimetinib or crizotinib, produced a synergistic effect of uveal melanoma. In this article, we summarize the development of drugs for treating uveal melanomas and discuss problems associated with current treatments. We also discuss the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic profile, adverse effects, and clinical trial for darovasertib, and future research directions for treating uveal melanoma.

RESUMEN

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common ocular malignancy in adults, associated with the poorest prognosis, with metastatic disease occurring in up to 50% of patients. In contrast to metastatic cutaneous melanoma, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with poor outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Tebentafusp, a bispecific molecule, has recently become the first treatment in decades to improve overall survival for mUM. This review summarises the existing and emerging immuno-oncology approaches for the treatment of mUM, and biomarkers of response and resistance to the same. Finally, we propose future research directions that could maximise treatment benefit to a wider pool of patients with UM.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in the treatment of primary uveal melanoma (UM), patients with metastatic disease continue to exhibit poor survival. METHODS: A retrospective review of metastatic UM patients at Yale (initial cohort) and Memorial Sloan Kettering (validation cohort) was conducted. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine baseline factors that are associated with overall survival, including sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale, laboratory measurements, metastasis location, and use of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapies. Differences in overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients with metastatic UM were identified; 71 and 18, in the initial and validation cohorts, respectively. In the initial cohort, median follow-up was 19.8 months (range, 2-127 months) and median overall survival was 21.8 months (95% CI, 16.6-31.3). Female sex, anti-CTLA-4, and anti-PD-1 therapy were associated with better survival outcomes with adjusted death hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.20-0.78), 0.44 (0.20-0.97), and 0.42 (0.22-0.84), respectively, whereas development of hepatic metastases and ECOG score ≥1 (per 1 U/L) were associated with worse survival outcomes with HRs of 2.86 (1.28-7.13) and 2.84 (1.29-6.09), respectively. In both the initial and validation cohorts, use of immune checkpoint inhibitors was associated with improved overall survival after adjusting for sex and ECOG score, with death HRs of 0.22 (0.08-0.56) and 0.04 (0.002-0.26), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Development of extrahepatic-only metastases, ECOG of 0, immune checkpoint therapy, and female sex were each associated with more than 2-fold reductions in risk of death. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Metastatic uveal melanoma patients face limited treatment options and poor survival rates. Results from this retrospective analysis indicate that immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapies, were associated with improved survival outcomes. Factors such as extrahepatic-only metastases, better baseline performance status, and female sex contributed to a more than 2-fold reduction in death risk. These findings highlight the potential of immunotherapy in treating metastatic uveal melanoma.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Uveal Melanoma (UM) is a rare and malignant intraocular tumor with dismal prognosis. Even if radiation or surgery permit an efficient control of the primary tumor, up to 50% of patients subsequently develop metastases, mainly in the liver. The treatment of UM metastases is challenging and the patient survival is very poor. The most recurrent event in UM is the activation of Gαq signaling induced by mutations in GNAQ/11. These mutations activate downstream effectors including protein kinase C (PKC) and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK). Clinical trials with inhibitors of these targets have not demonstrated a survival benefit for patients with UM metastasis. Recently, it has been shown that GNAQ promotes YAP activation through the focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Pharmacological inhibition of MEK and FAK showed remarkable synergistic growth-inhibitory effects in UM both in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we have evaluated the synergy of the FAK inhibitor with a series of inhibitors targeting recognized UM deregulated pathways in a panel of cell lines. The combined inhibition of FAK and MEK or PKC had highly synergistic effects by reducing cell viability and inducing apoptosis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that these combinations exert a remarkable in vivo activity in UM patient-derived xenografts. Our study confirms the previously described synergy of the dual inhibition of FAK and MEK and identifies a novel combination of drugs (FAK and PKC inhibitors) as a promising strategy for therapeutic intervention in metastatic UM.

RESUMEN

On January 25, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of tebentafusp, a bispecific glycoprotein 100 (gp100) peptide-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-directed CD3 T-cell activator, for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Pharmacodynamic data indicate that tebentafusp targets a specific HLA-A*02:01/gp100 complex, activating both CD4+/CD8+ effector and memory T cells that induce tumor cell death. Tebentafusp is administered to patients via intravenous infusion daily or weekly, depending on the indication. Phase III trials have documented a 1-year overall survival of 73%, overall response rate of 9%, progression-free survival of 31% and disease control rate of 46%. Common adverse events reported are cytokine release syndrome, rash, pyrexia, pruritus, fatigue, nausea, chills, abdominal pain, edema, hypotension, dry skin, headache and vomiting. Compared to other types of melanomas, mUM presents with a distinct profile of genetic mutations, which phenotypically results in limited survival efficacy when using traditional melanoma treatments. The low current treatment efficacy for mUM, alongside a poor long-term prognosis and high mortality rates, gives precedence for the approval of tebentafusp to be groundbreaking in its clinical impact. This review will discuss the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile, and the clinical trials used to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tebentafusp.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare type of melanoma with distinct features from cutaneous melanoma, low response rates to immune checkpoint inhibition, and poor survival rates. Tebentafusp, a bispecific antibody engaging T cells with gp 100 on HLA-A*02:01, was recently approved by the FDA as the first drug of its class and the first treatment approved by the FDA to treat UM. In this review, we summarize the preclinical and clinical data on tebentafusp for UM. We additionally discuss patient selection and the relevant challenges. For the literature search, PubMed search and relevant articles presented at international conferences were used.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular tumor and often spreads to the liver. Intercellular communication though extracellular vesicles (EVs) plays an important role in several oncogenic processes, including metastasis, therapeutic resistance, and immune escape. This study examines how EVs released by UM cells modify stellate and endothelial cells in the tumor microenvironment. The surface markers, and the concentration and size of EVs derived from UM cells or choroidal melanocytes were characterized by high-resolution flow cytometry, electron microscopy, and Western blotting. The selective biodistribution of EVs was studied in mice by fluorescence imaging. The activation/contractility of stellate cells and the tubular organization of endothelial cells after exposure to melanomic EVs were determined by traction force microscopy, collagen gel contraction, or endothelial tube formation assays. We showed that large EVs from UM cells and healthy melanocytes are heterogenous in size, as well as their expression of phosphatidylserine, tetraspanins, and Tsg101. Melanomic EVs mainly accumulated in the liver and lungs of mice. Hepatic stellate cells with internalized melanomic EVs had increased contractility, whereas EV-treated endothelial cells developed more capillary-like networks. Our study demonstrates that the transfer of EVs from UM cells leads to a pro-fibrotic and pro-angiogenic phenotype in hepatic stellate and endothelial cells.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical relevance of low-frequency copy number aberrations (CNAs) in uveal melanoma (UM) and to discern residual genomic and clinical heterogeneity within established molecular subtypes based on genome-wide CNA profiling of 921 primary tumors. Design: Retrospective single-center case series. Participants: Patients with primary UM referred for genetic testing between 2008 and 2016 (n = 921). The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort with clinical outcome data available (n = 70) was used to validate findings. Methods: Genome-wide CNAs were generated for primary tumors from 921 patients and for 19 metastatic UM (mUM) in the liver. Of the 921 patients, metastatic outcome was known for 678 patients with a median time to metastasis of 4.5 years. The primary tumors were processed on the Affymetrix arrays SNP-5.0 (n = 140), SNP-6.0 (n = 359), or CytoScanHD (n = 422), and the metastatic tumors on the CytoScanHD array (n = 19). Recurrent CNAs were identified, and the prognostic effect of individual CNAs and multiple CNA clustering strategies, including more specific molecular subgroups with rare CNAs, were evaluated. Main Outcome Measures: CNA recurrence, and effect of CNAs and derived molecular subtypes on metastatic-free survival. Results: Genomic profiling revealed CNAs associated with risk of metastasis and demonstrated a strong association between chromosomal instability and patient prognosis. Using standard prognostic CNAs, 6 clusters were detected, and inclusion of chromosome 16q deletion revealed an additional cluster. Of these 7 genomic clusters, 5 patient groups showed distinct rates of metastasis, indicating that different genomic patterns can have similar patient outcomes. A small group of patients with a significantly higher rate of metastasis was characterized by monosomy 3, 8q amplification, and deletion of 1p or 16q. Although this ultra-high-risk group accounts for only 7% of this cohort, 88% demonstrated metastasis within 4 years, compared with 45% in the second-highest risk group. Conclusions: These results suggest that 1p and 16q deletion should be incorporated in clinical assays to assess prognosis at diagnosis and to guide enrollment in clinical trials for adjuvant therapies.

RESUMEN

Patients diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) have a poor survival prognosis. Unfortunately for this rare disease, there is no known cure and suitable therapeutic options are limited. HDAC6 inhibitors (HDAC6i) are currently in clinical trials for other cancers and show potential beneficial effects against tumor cell survival in vitro and in vivo. In MUM cells, HDAC6i show an anti-proliferative effect in vitro and in preclinical xenograft models. The use of HDAC6 inhibitors as a treatment option for MUM should be explored further. Therefore, this review discusses (1) what is known about HDAC6i in MUM and (2) whether HDAC6 inhibitors offer a potential therapeutic option for MUM.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Uveal melanoma (UM) is an intraocular malignancy with poor survival rates due to the propensity for metastatic spread. Although treatment options exist for localized disease, there are fewer definitive guidelines for metastatic UM. Treatment involves a personalized approach that entails patient-specific aspects, including tumor genetics. This case highlights the disease course of a 60-year-old male diagnosed with stage IIB right eye choroidal melanoma. Despite successful therapy for localized UM, he developed widespread metastasis. He received dual immunotherapy and was ultimately maintained on a single-agent regimen. His prognosis has surpassed initial prognosis and survival expectations. This case highlights the use of immunotherapy, both dual and single therapy, to treat this rare malignancy and extend overall survival.

RESUMEN

Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) is characterized by poor patient survival. Unfortunately, current treatment options demonstrate limited benefits. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of ACY-1215, a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), to attenuate growth of primary ocular UM cell lines and, in particular, a liver MUM cell line in vitro and in vivo, and elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. A significant (p = 0.0001) dose-dependent reduction in surviving clones of the primary ocular UM cells, Mel270, was observed upon treatment with increasing doses of ACY-1215. Treatment of OMM2.5 MUM cells with ACY-1215 resulted in a significant (p = 0.0001), dose-dependent reduction in cell survival and proliferation in vitro, and in vivo attenuation of primary OMM2.5 xenografts in zebrafish larvae. Furthermore, flow cytometry revealed that ACY-1215 significantly arrested the OMM2.5 cell cycle in S phase (p = 0.0001) following 24 h of treatment, and significant apoptosis was triggered in a time- and dose-dependent manner (p < 0.0001). Additionally, ACY-1215 treatment resulted in a significant reduction in OMM2.5 p-ERK expression levels. Through proteome profiling, the attenuation of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) signaling pathway was linked to the observed anti-cancer effects of ACY-1215. In agreement, pharmacological inhibition of MITF signaling with ML329 significantly reduced OMM2.5 cell survival and viability in vitro (p = 0.0001) and reduced OMM2.5 cells in vivo (p = 0.0006). Our findings provide evidence that ACY-1215 and ML329 are efficacious against growth and survival of OMM2.5 MUM cells.

RESUMEN

Uveal melanoma (UM) is an orphan disease with a mortality of 80% within one year upon the development of metastatic disease. UM does hardly respond to chemotherapy and kinase inhibitors and is largely resistant to checkpoint inhibition. Hence, further therapy approaches are urgently needed. To improve clinical outcome, we designed a trial employing the 3rd generation personalized IKKß-matured RNA-transfected dendritic cell (DC) vaccine which primes T cells and in addition activates NK cells. This ongoing phase I trial [NCT04335890 (www.clinicaltrials.gov), Eudract: 2018-004390-28 (www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu)] investigates patients with treatment-naive metastatic UM. Monocytes are isolated by leukapheresis, differentiated to immature DCs, matured with a cytokine cocktail, and activated via the NF-κB pathway by electroporation with RNA encoding a constitutively active mutant of IKKß. Three types of antigen-RNA are co-electroporated: i) amplified mRNA of the tumor representing the whole transcriptome, ii) RNA encoding driver mutations identified by exome sequencing, and iii) overexpressed non-mutated tumor antigens detected by transcriptome sequencing. This highly personalized DC vaccine is applied by 9 intravenous infusions in a staggered schedule over one year. Parallel to the vaccination, standard therapy, usually an immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) as mono (anti-PD-1) or combined (anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1) regimen is initiated. The coordinated vaccine-induced immune response encompassing tumor-specific T cells and innate NK cells should synergize with ICB, perhaps resulting in measurable clinical responses in this resistant tumor entity. Primary outcome measures of this trial are safety, tolerability and toxicity; secondary outcome measures comprise overall survival and induction of antigen-specific T cells.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Challenges persist in identifying patients with stage IV uveal melanoma. While clinical, histopathologic, and genetic features of the primary tumor have been shown to provide prognostic value for assessing metastatic risk, biopsy-related genetic analyses are expensive and not universally available. Therefore, this review will focus on clinical characteristics. Initial staging and follow-up screening protocols have evolved for patients with uveal melanoma. The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) required a physical examination, chest X-ray, and hematologic survey (primarily liver function tests). Though these studies were found to have a high specificity, COMS investigators typically found late-stage metastases. More recently, protocols have concentrated on liver imaging (abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging). Though hepatic radiographic imaging has been found more likely to reveal earlier metastatic uveal melanoma, by definition it cannot detect most extrahepatic and multiorgan metastases. An international multicenter registry study recently focused on patients who were diagnosed with stage IV uveal melanoma simultaneously with their primary intraocular melanoma. Therein, utilizing center-specific diagnostic methods, stage IV was found to occur in about 2% of patients. However, subgroup analysis found that a disproportionate number of multi-organ metastases were discovered when whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography was used for staging. Herein, we review the literature on patients who present with stage IV uveal melanoma, how they were detected, and their outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Uveal Melanoma (UM) is a rare disease; however, it is the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Hematogenous metastasis, occurring in up to 50% of cases, mainly to the liver (90%), is associated with poor clinical course and treatment failure. In contrast to dramatic benefits of immunotherapy in many tumor entities, as seen in cutaneous melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) do not achieve comparable results in Metastatic UM (MUM). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of ICI with liver-directed therapies provides a potential survival benefit for those affected. This retrospective, single-center study, including n = 45 patients with MUM, compared the effect of combining ICI with liver-directed therapy ("Cohort 1") with respect to standard therapies ("Cohort 2") on overall survival (OS). Our results revealed a significant survival difference between Cohort 1 (median OS 22.5 months) and Cohort 2 (median OS 11.4 months), indicating that this combination may enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy and thus provide a survival benefit. There is an urgent need for randomized, prospective trials addressing the combination of liver-directed therapies and various strategies of immunotherapy (such as ICI; IMCgp100; personalized vaccines) in order to establish regimens which finally improve the prognosis of patients with MUM.