RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Frozen shoulder, also known as adhesive capsulitis, is characterized by the insidious onset of pain and progressive loss of global active and passive mobility of the glenohumeral joint, which can be treated by non-surgical or surgical methods. This study was done to evaluate the functional outcome of intra-articular (I/A) steroid injection and manipulation of the shoulder joint manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) in frozen shoulder. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was done in a tertiary care hospital in Pokhara, Nepal. A total of 35 patients over 40 years were included in the study. All the patients underwent I/A steroid injection and MUA. The functional outcome was evaluated using a Constant-Murley shoulder score (CSS) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring system. RESULT: The mean age was 53.46±7.524 years. Twenty-two were female, while 13 were male. Twelve patients were associated with diabetes. Minor complications were noted in 15 patients (14 with transient pain and one with facial flushing). At 12 weeks, the mean VAS score was 2.16±1.33 cm, and the mean CSS score was 82.66±7.008. At 24 weeks, the mean VAS was 1.534±1.195 cm, and the mean CSS score was 85.77±6.998. CONCLUSION: This study shows that patients with frozen shoulder treated with I/A steroid injection and MUA give excellent functional outcomes in most patients.

RESUMEN

Background: Studies have linked socioeconomic factors including lower income and minority race with worse functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Arthrofibrosis is a common complication following TKA, and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is an effective treatment option for arthrofibrosis. This study aimed to determine if neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage predicts need for MUA and postoperative range of motion (ROM) among patients undergoing primary elective TKA. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of primary TKAs performed at a single institution over a three-year duration. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to determine each patient's level of socioeconomic disadvantage based on their home address. Patients were allocated into three groups based on ADI: least socioeconomic disadvantage (ADI 1-3), middle socioeconomic disadvantage (ADI 4-6), and most socioeconomic disadvantage (ADI 7-10). Demographic factors and comorbid conditions were recorded. Bivariate analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between degree of socioeconomic disadvantage and need for MUA and postoperative ROM. Results: In total, 600 patients were included and 26.7 % were categorized as most disadvantaged. In comparison to the middle and least disadvantaged groups, these patients were more likely to be Women (71.2 vs. 67.9 and 58.6 %; p = 0.027), younger (60.7 vs. 62.9 and 66.3 years; p < 0.001) and have higher BMI (34.9 vs. 33 and 31.7; p < 0.001) (most disadvantaged vs. middle and least). Analysis revealed no difference in rate of MUA (6.3 vs. 2.5 vs. 4 %; p = 0.179) or postoperative ROM (98 vs. 98 vs. 100°; p = 0.753) between the three groups (most, middle, and least disadvantaged, respectively). Conclusion: Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage does not predict rate of MUA or postoperative ROM following TKA. Patients residing in neighborhoods with higher ADI who underwent TKA were more likely to be younger, Women, and have higher BMI, consistent with previous literature. Our results support efforts to improve access to orthopaedic care, including TKA, to patients of all socioeconomic levels.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the range of motion (ROM) of the knee in patients with severe post-traumatic knee arthrofibrosis after being treated with arthroscopic fibroarthrolysis (AFA) and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). METHODS: Case series of patients with severe post-traumatic knee arthrofibrosis who underwent AFL+MUA in a national referral center. The primary outcome to be assessed was ROM before and after surgery and then at 3-month intervals until a minimum follow-up of one year was completed. RESULTS: 51 patients were included. The main injuries preceding the stiffness were tibial plateau fracture (37.3%), distal femur fracture (27.5%), and femoral shaft fracture (15.7%). Forty-five patients had severe flexion deficits with a median preoperative flexion of 70°. Intraoperative flexion significantly improved to 110°. Significant loss of flexion was observed at 3 and 6 months, however, patients regained ROM in the 9 and 12-month follow-ups. At discharge, 80% of the patients achieved flexion of 90° or more. There were 4 intraoperative complications and 3 reinterventions were performed. CONCLUSION: AFA+MUA can help patients with severe post-traumatic knee arthrofibrosis to recover ROM in most cases. However, this procedure is not without risks and complications, therefore, careful consideration should be given to its indication and execution.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stiffness remains a common complication after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is the gold standard treatment for early postoperative stiffness; however, there remains a paucity of data on the risk of MUA after primary TKA if a prior contralateral TKA required MUA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 3,102 patients who had staged primary TKAs between 2016 and 2021. The mean body mass index was 33 (range, 18 to 59) and the mean age was 67 years (range, 24 to 91). The mean preoperative range of motion for the first TKA was 2 to 104°, and for the contralateral TKA was 1 to 107°. The primary outcomes were MUA following first and second primary TKAs. Multivariable Poisson regressions were used to evaluate associations between risk factors and outcomes. RESULTS: The rate of MUA after the first TKA was 2.6% (n = 83 of 3,102) and 1.3% (n = 40 of 3,102) after the contralateral TKA. After adjustment, there was a nearly 14-fold higher rate of MUA after the second TKA if the patient had an MUA after the first TKA (relative risk, 13.80; 95% CI [confidence interval], 7.14 to 26.66). For the first TKA, increasing age (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.83) and increasing body mass index (ARR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.90) were associated with lower risk for MUA. For the second TKA, increasing age was associated with a lower risk of MUA (ARR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing staged bilateral TKA, patients who undergo MUA following the first primary TKA are nearly 14-fold more likely to undergo an MUA following the contralateral primary TKA than those who did not have an MUA after their first TKA.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Discrepant data exists regarding the outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a prior anterior cruciate reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of our study was to compare surgical and medical outcomes in the patients with prior ACLR undergoing TKAs compared to a matched control group of the patients who had undergone TKAs without prior ACLR. We hypothesized that the patients with prior ACLR would have inferior clinical outcomes. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively queried the PearlDiver-database for patients who underwent TKA following ACLR from 2011 to 2020. We used propensity-score matching to create two cohorts. The two-sided independent t-test and Chi-Squared test were used. RESULTS: We identified 2,174 patients who had prior ACLR before the TKAs. There were another 1,348,870 patients who did not have ACLR before the TKAs. After matching, each group had 2,171 patients. The ACLR-TKA group had significantly lower rates of aseptic revision at 2 years (1.2% vs. 4.0%, OR 0.3, p < 0.01), PJI requiring antibiotic spacer at 2 years (0.3% vs. 0.8%, OR 0.35, p = 0.02), and MUA at 90 days (0.4% vs. 7.5%, OR 0.05, p < 0.01). The rate of wound disruption was lower for the ACLR-TKA group at 90 days (p = 0.03) as were several medical complications including AKI at 90 days (p < 0.01), DVT at 90 days (p < 0.01), pneumonia at 90 days (0.04), and required blood transfusion at 90 days (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These results differed from our expectations. Within the limitations of the study, we are unable to determine the factors for the lower complications in the ACLR-TKA group. The data from this study are different from what had been reported in the previous studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a painful and debilitating condition affecting the shoulder joint. When patients fail to improve after conservative treatments, operative treatments including arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) are recommended. However, the comparison between these two interventions remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ACR and MUA for refractory FS. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies until December 10, 2023. Meta-analyses were conducted using Manager V.5.3.3. Pooled effect sizes were expressed as the weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of eight comparative studies with 768 patients were included. Compared with MUA, ACR had statistically better Δ VAS (WMD, -0.44; 95% CI, -0.71 to -0.18; I2 = 6%; p = 0.001) at over 12-month follow-up, which did not reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Other outcomes regarding pain relief, function, and range of motion (ROM) improvements were not statistically different between the two groups at different follow-up timepoints. Compared with the MUA group, the ACR group had a significantly higher rate of severe complications (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.01 to 16.94; I2 = 0%; p = 0.05), but comparable rates of mild complications and additional intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In treating refractory FS, ACR demonstrated comparable pain relief, functional and ROM improvements, rates of mild complications and additional intervention but a higher risk of severe complications to MUA during short-term follow-up periods. Notably, ACR exhibited statistically superior improvement in the long-term pain relief compared to the MUA group, although it did not reach the MCID.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often treated with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). However, there is debate regarding the timing of MUA, with many recommending against MUA beyond 3 months after TKA. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of early versus delayed MUA for stiffness following TKA. METHODS: A search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases in November 2023. Data regarding study characteristics, demographics, knee flexion and extension, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and revisions were collected. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies. Included were 14 studies analyzing 13,445 knees, 72.1% of which underwent early MUA and 27.8% of which underwent delayed MUA. Of the 14 studies, 10 defined early MUA as being performed within 3 months of the index TKA. RESULTS: Pre-MUA and post-MUA knee flexion for the early/delayed groups was 71.3°/77.9° and 103.0°/96.1°, respectively. Upon meta-analysis, pre-MUA knee flexion was significantly higher in the delayed group (P = .003), whereas post-MUA flexion was similar in both groups (P = .36). The mean gain in knee flexion for the early and delayed groups was 32.0°/19.2°. The surgical complication and revision TKA rates for the early and delayed groups were 4.9%/10.3% and 5%/9%, respectively. A meta-analysis found the risk of surgical or medical complications and revision TKA to be significantly higher in the delayed MUA group (P < .00001 and = .002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although post-MUA knee flexion was similar in patients undergoing early and delayed MUA following TKA, the mean gain in flexion for early patients was nearly double that of delayed patients. Delayed patients also had significantly higher risks of surgical or medical complications and revision TKA following MUA.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical procedure performed to alleviate pain and improve functional outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis who have failed conservative treatments. Arthrofibrosis has been extensively studied due to its negative impact on TKA outcomes. Losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), has the potential to improve TKA outcomes by inhibiting TGF-ß and decreasing fibrosis. This study aims to analyze a large-scale, real-world healthcare database to investigate the association between losartan potassium prescription and postoperative outcomes such as readmissions, ED visits, and the need for MUA or revision TKA. HYPOTHESIS: Based on previous literature and the nature of ARBs, it is expected that the addition of losartan will aid in better outcomes for patients following a primary TKA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, the TriNetX Research Network (TriNetX) database was queried as of June 21, 2023. All patients who underwent a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prior to June 21, 2022 were included. Patients were then divided into two cohorts by whether they had an active losartan potassium prescription within the year prior to their surgery to within 90days postoperatively. Patients were then propensity-matched to eliminate differences in demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: Losartan TKA patients were 1.18 [OR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90), p<0.001] times less likely to be readmitted within 90days and were 1.15 (OR: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96); p=0.009) times less likely to undergo a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) within the 1-year postoperative period. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of emergency department (ED) visits at 90days postoperatively or revision TKAs at 1year postoperatively. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, patients with an active losartan prescription prior to TKA had a significantly lower likelihood of readmission within 90days and a lower likelihood of undergoing MUA within the 1-year postoperative period compared to patients not taking losartan. This presents an opportunity for further clinical investigation to explore the value of losartan in TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; an observational cohort study.

RESUMEN

Background Penthrox is a handheld inhaler that administers methoxyflurane. Its use is approved for analgesia in moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults in the ED. The literature currently lacks methodologically robust qualitative data on individual patient experiences. Using a structured qualitative study, we set out to address this shortcoming. Methods Five patients were selected as a focus group to identify key themes they felt were important to explore, and these were included in the questionnaire design. We retrospectively identified all uses of Penthrox in the ED from June to August 2021. Qualitative data was gathered using the Trickett short interview method, and responses were grouped into positive and negative descriptors. In addition, quantitative data concerning their experience using the 5-point Likert scale was also gathered. Results A total of 101 participants responded to the questionnaire. Penthrox was utilised mainly for the manipulation of fractures, most commonly those of the ankle and wrist. Around 90% reported an overall satisfaction of ≥ good, and 97% reported the ease of use to be ≥ good. Its analgesic effectiveness was rated as excellent by 52%, and ≥ good by 89%. The most reported side effects were drowsiness (13%) and nausea (7%). The majority reported no side effects (74%). About 94% of the participants said they would take it again if required. An NVivo word cloud (Lumivero, Denver, CO, USA) was created visually, confirming an overall positive experience amongst the patients. Conclusions This study shows that Penthrox is a well-tolerated and user-friendly means of alleviating trauma-related pain in the ED. It highlights the importance of taking into consideration the individual patient journey alongside robust evidence-based data on safety and efficacy for the development of a holistic treatment.

RESUMEN

Background: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a common cause of shoulder pain and stiffness. Conservative treatment is sufficient for the majority of patients with long-term recovery of shoulder function. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is known as a well-established treatment option if conservative treatment fails. It is unknown whether MUA does indeed shorten the duration of symptoms or leads to a superior outcome compared to conservative treatment. The objective of the current trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of MUA followed by a physiotherapy (PT) program compared to a PT program alone in patients with stage 2 FS. Methods: A prospective, single-center randomized controlled trial was performed. Patients between 18 and 70 years old with stage 2 FS were deemed eligible if an initial course of conservative treatment consisting of PT and intra-articular corticosteroid infiltration was considered unsatisfactory. Patients were randomized, and data was collected with an online data management platform (CASTOR). MUA was performed by a single surgeon under interscalene block, and intensive PT treatment protocol was started within 4 hours after MUA. In the PT group, patients were referred to instructed physiotherapist, and treatment was guided by tissue irritability. The primary outcome was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score. Secondary outcomes were pain, range of motion (ROM), Oxford Shoulder Score, quality of life, and ability to work. Results: In total, 82 patients were included, 42 in the PT group and 40 in the MUA group. There was a significant improvement in SPADI, Oxford Shoulder Score, pain, ROM, and quality of life in both groups at 1-year follow-up. SPADI scores at three months were significantly improved in favor of MUA. MUA showed a significantly bigger increase in anteflexion and abduction compared to PT at all points of follow-up. No significant differences between both groups were found for all other parameters. No fractures, dislocations, or brachial plexus injuries occurred in this trial. Conclusion: MUA in stage 2 FS can be considered safe and results in a faster recovery of ROM and improved functional outcome, measured with SPADI scores, compared to PT alone in the short term. After 1 year, except for slightly better ROM scores for MUA, the result of MUA is equal to PT.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) of the shoulder joint is a commonly used method for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. Though it has been known to be associated with a variety of complications, there is a paucity of studies describing the arthroscopic findings after MUA. AIM: To describe the arthroscopic findings in patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder after MUA. METHODS: We recruited 28 patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis who underwent arthroscopic capsular release. Manipulation of the shoulder was performed under anesthesia in all of these patients before capsular release. Intra-articular findings were recorded during arthroscopic capsular release in these patients. RESULTS: All patients showed the presence of synovitis. Twenty-seven patients showed tears in the capsule on the anterior aspect. One patient had an avulsion of the anterior rim of the glenoid and labrum following the manipulation. Four patients had partial rotator cuff tears, and one patient showed a superior labrum anterior posterior lesion, which was not diagnosed preoperatively on magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSION: MUA leads to rupture of the capsule, which is the desired outcome. However, the site of rupture of the capsule is dependent on the maneuvers of MUA. In addition, partial tears of the rotator cuff and osteochondral fractures of the glenoid can also occur.

RESUMEN

Background: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a pathological condition that involves a painful and stiff shoulder joint, most commonly in people aged 40-60 years. Most literature supports treatment with physical therapy (PT), although some studies have demonstrated years of continuing pain and functional deficits. Manipulation under anesthesia is effective at eliminating the contracture of intra-articular lesions for refractory FS. This study aimed to compare whether manipulation under anesthesia or PT is a more effective treatment in refractory FS. Methods: This study was a prospective observational study. A total of 102 patients with refractory FS were enrolled in this study in the medical records, all of whom had severe and multidirectional loss of motion and thickening of the joint capsule and coracohumeral ligament on magnetic resonance imaging. Fifty-one patients were in the manipulation under brachial plexus block (MUB) group (34 females, median age: 57 years), and 51 patients were in the PT group (34 females, median age: 59 years). The MUB procedure consisted of the conventional method with additional adduction manipulation, in which one examiner initially abducted the shoulder joint as much as possible. We recorded the visual analog scale, shoulder range of motion, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant Scores at the initial baseline visit and at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. The total cost was calculated from the medical records, and cost-effectiveness was evaluated using quality-adjusted life year and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: Visual analog scale (P < .001), range of motion (P < .001), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant Scores (P < .001) in the MUB group were significantly superior to those in the PT group at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The median cost and total quality-adjusted life year in the MUB and PT groups were $1375 versus $2751 and 2.95 versus 2.68, respectively, and the cost-effectiveness ratio between the MUB and PT groups was calculated as -$560. Conclusions: The new MUB procedure provides a shorter treatment period, better clinical outcomes, and higher cost-effectiveness in patients with refractory FS compared to PT.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a common condition that can cause severe pain and limited range of motion in the shoulder joint. While intra-articular steroid injection has been shown to be an effective treatment for FS, manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is an alternative treatment that has gained popularity in recent years. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness of MUA on FS patients with concomitant rotator cuff injury or tear. Though a few studies have shown that MUA is not associated with rotator cuff tears, and will not exacerbate the injury, more high-quality studies with bigger sample sizes are needed. Therefore, the aim of this multi-center, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, superiority study is to compare the efficacy of MUA versus intra-articular steroid injection in the treatment of FS patients with a diagnosis of rotator cuff injury or tear by MRI. METHODS: A parallel, single-blinded, multi-center randomized controlled trial of 320 patients will be conducted at three hospitals of China. Eligible patients with frozen shoulder and rotator cuff injury or tear diagnosed by MRI will be randomly assigned to, in equal proportions, the manipulation under anesthesia group and the intra-articular steroid injection group via a central randomization system, undergoing a corresponding operation on day one and a sequent physical exercise for 14 days. The primary outcome is the comprehensive efficacy evaluation (total effective rate) and the change of Constant-Murley Score. Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded, and participants will be asked not to reveal their allocation to assessors. DISCUSSION: This study aims to explore the superiority of manipulation under anesthesia in reducing pain and improving shoulder function in frozen shoulder patients accompanied with rotator cuff injury. To provide a scientific basis for the dissemination and application of manipulation under anesthesia, and a better knowledge for the role of MUA in the treatment of frozen shoulder accompanied with rotator cuff injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2200067122 . Registered on 27 December 2022. ChiCTR is a primary registry of the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) network and includes all items from the WHO Trial Registration data set in Trial registration.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of patients who fail manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) as a treatment for posttraumatic knee stiffness and determine the risk factors for MUA failure. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at a level I trauma center. We identified 213 knees in 199 patients with arthrofibrosis treated by MUA within 1 year of injury from 2007 to 2020. The primary outcome was MUA failure as defined by need for repeat MUA or surgical release after MUA. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between MUA failure and potential risk factors. RESULTS: Overall, 111 knees (52%) failed treatment with MUA. An association was demonstrated between MUA failure and delay in treatment >90 days after injury (OR 3.6, p < 0.01), neurologic injury (OR 2.2, p = 0.02), and pre-procedure knee flexion <45° (OR 1.9, p < 0.01). The rate of failure for knees with no risk factors was 0% (0 of 14), 37% for knees with one risk factor (27 of 73), and 67% (84 of 126) for knees with two or more risk factors. CONCLUSION: For patients whose MUA is delayed beyond 90 days postinjury, pre-manipulation knee flexion is <45°, or those with associated neurologic injury; odds of MUA failing to correct posttraumatic arthrofibrosis are significantly increased. The likelihood of obtaining adequate range of motion (ROM) with MUA alone is lower than reported in other populations, with a higher likelihood of being treated with surgical release or additional MUA to attempt to obtain adequate ROM.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Although surgical devices and techniques continue to improve, regular post-operative monitoring of patients is required to ensure the best outcomes. New technological advances have allowed physicians to monitor the daily recovery of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. This report is the first to describe the utilization of an implantable gait monitoring device and its capacity to detect poor early post-operative outcomes. Case Report: Two patients, a 78-year-old male and a 34-year-old female, were assessed post-TKA utilizing remote gait kinematics and clinical evaluations and determined to need manipulation under anesthesia due to severely limited range of motion. One patient, a 51-year-old female, with good clinical outcomes, was used for comparison. Conclusion: Remote monitoring may provide an earlier indication than clinical evaluations in identification of TKA patients at risk of poor outcomes and may who need intervention. The use of remote kinematic gait data in earlier identification of patients at risk has the potential to help improve outcomes for the broader population of TKA patients.

RESUMEN

Chronic knee pain is one of the most common complaints in primary care offices. Osteopathic family physicians Leonid Tafler and Samira Ovshaev have worked tirelessly for over 10 years to develop a revolutionary and unique technique for treating chronic knee pain. This technique is easy to learn and can be performed at any outpatient practice. This unique technique involves knee traction, which can be performed under anesthesia with one or two consecutive days of treatment, or it can be performed with the assistance of a supportive device in more than two therapy sessions without anesthesia. This new technique has the potential to become a first-line noninvasive technique for chronic knee pain that can go a long way in reducing the burden of debilitating knee pain for patients and their loved ones. This case report aims to describe a few cases of chronic knee pain successfully treated in the office-based surgical center by osteopathic physicians using this innovative technique. Throughout the last 10 years, patients have reported remarkable improvement in their knee pain following treatment with this technique, which has, in turn, significantly increased their quality of life.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of medications to prevent arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear. We investigated the effect of common oral medications with reported antifibrotic properties on preventing arthrofibrosis and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) following primary TKA. METHODS: Using our total joint registry, 9,771 patients (12,735 knees) who underwent TKA with cemented, posterior-stabilized, and metal-backed tibial components from 2000 to 2016 were identified. Arthrofibrosis, defined as range of motion (ROM) ≤90° for ≥12 weeks postoperatively or as ROM ≤90° requiring MUA, was diagnosed in 454 knees (4%) and matched 1:2 to controls. Mean age was 62 years (range, 19 to 87) and 57% were women. The majority of operative diagnoses were osteoarthritis. Perioperative use of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), oral corticosteroids, antihistamines, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were manually confirmed. Medication effect in preventing arthrofibrosis and MUA was assessed using adjusted multivariable analyses. Mean follow-up was 8 years (range, 2 to 20). RESULTS: Reduced risk of arthrofibrosis was associated with perioperative NSAID use (odds ratio (OR) 0.67, P = .045). A similar trend was observed with perioperative corticosteroids (OR 0.52, P = .098). Corticosteroids were associated with reduced risk of MUA (OR 0.26, P = .036), and NSAIDs trended towards reducing MUA (OR 0.69, P = .11). CONCLUSION: This investigation determined that perioperative NSAID use was associated with reduced risk of arthrofibrosis and trended towards reduced risk of subsequent MUA. Similarly, oral corticosteroids were associated with reduced risk of MUA and trended towards reduced risk of arthrofibrosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is debilitating and poorly understood. A heterogenous approach to the treatment is often utilized, including both nonoperative and operative treatment modalities. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of treatments used between stiff and non-stiff TKA groups and their financial impact. METHODS: An observational cohort study was conducted using a large database. A total of 12,942 patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, were included. Stiffness after TKA was defined as manipulation under anesthesia and a diagnosis code of stiffness or ankylosis, and subsequent diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify the prevalence and financial impact of multiple common treatment options. RESULTS: The prevalence of stiffness after TKA was 6.1%. Stiff patients were more likely to undergo physical therapy, medication, bracing, alternative treatment, clinic visits, and reoperation. Revision surgery was the most common reoperation in the stiff TKA group (7.6%). The incidence of both arthroscopy and revision surgery were higher in the stiff TKA population. Dual component revisions were costlier for patients who had stiff TKAs ($65,771 versus $48,287; P < .05). On average, patients who had stiffness after TKA endured costs from 1.5 to 7.5 times higher than the cost of their non-stiff counterparts during the 2 years following index TKA. CONCLUSION: Patients who have stiffness after primary TKA face significantly higher treatment costs for both operative and nonoperative treatments than patients who do not have stiffness.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many studies have demonstrated that in patients whose primary language is not English, outcomes after an orthopaedic surgery are worse compared to primary English speakers. The goal of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who prefer English as their first language versus those who prefer a different language. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary TKA from May 2012 to July 2021. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether English was their preferred primary language (PPL). Of the 13,447 patients who underwent primary TKA, 11,290 reported English as their PPL, and 2,157 preferred a language other than English. Patients whose PPL was not English were further stratified based on whether they requested interpreter services. Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine the significance of perioperative outcomes while controlling for demographic differences. RESULTS: Our analysis found that non-English PPL patients had significantly lower rates of readmission (P = .040), overall revision (P = .028), and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA; P = .025) within 90 days postoperatively. Sub analyses of the non-English PPL group showed that those who requested interpreter services had significantly lower 1-year revision (P < .001) and overall MUA (P = .049) rates. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that TKA patients who communicated in English without an interpreter were significantly more likely to undergo revision, readmission, and MUA. These findings may suggest that language barriers may make it more difficult to identify postoperative problems or concerns in non-English speakers, which may limit appropriate postoperative care. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a disabling complication and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is often performed as an early intervention. Few studies have focused on the revision risk, infection risk, demographics, and clinical outcomes in Medicare patients undergoing MUA following primary TKA. METHODS: We reviewed 142,440 patients who had primary TKA from a national database and identified 3,652 patients (2.6%) who underwent MUA. Patient demographics and comorbid conditions were evaluated to identify risk factors. Incidence of revision and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) at 1-, 2-, and 5-year time points in a cohort of MUA patients was compared to patients who did not undergo MUA. Multivariate Cox regressions were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The incidence of MUA was higher in Black versus White individuals (4.1 versus 2.5%, P < .001). Revision risk was significantly greater in the MUA group at 1-, 2-, and 5-year time points with a hazard ratio (HR) of, 3.81, 3.90, and 3.22 respectively, P < .001. One- and 2-year revision risk was significantly greater when MUA occurred at 6 to 12 months post-TKA when compared to <3 months, P < .05. Risk of PJI was significantly greater in the MUA group with a HR of 2.2, 2.2, and 2.1 at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively P < .001. CONCLUSION: The incidence of MUA was 2.6%. There was an increased incidence of revision surgery and PJI in patients undergoing MUA. Patients at increased risk for stiffness following TKA should be closely monitored and treated with early intervention to minimize risk of poor outcomes.

Asunto(s)