RESUMEN

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) who undergo lower extremity revascularization (LER) are at high risk for cardiovascular and limb-related ischemic events. The role of antithrombotic therapy is to prevent thrombotic complications, but this requires balancing increased risk of bleeding events. The dual pathway inhibition (DPI) strategy including aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban after LER has been shown to reduce major adverse cardiovascular and limb-related events without significant differences in major bleeding. There is now a need to implement the broad adoption of DPI therapy in PAD patients who have undergone LER in routine practice.

Asunto(s)

Fibrinolíticos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Trombosis/prevención & control , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación

RESUMEN

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common condition characterized by atherosclerosis in the peripheral arteries, associated with concomitant coronary and cerebrovascular diseases. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are a class of drugs that have shown potential in hypercholesterolemic patients. This review focuses on the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of PCSK9 inhibitors in PAD based on the literature indexed by PubMed. Trials such as FOURIER and ODYSSEY demonstrate the efficacy of evolocumab and alirocumab in reducing cardiovascular events, offering a potential treatment option for PAD patients. Safety evaluations from trials show few adverse events, most of which are injection-site reactions, indicating the overall safety profile of PCSK9 inhibitors. Clinical outcomes show a reduction in cardiovascular events, ischemic strokes, and major adverse limb events. However, despite these positive findings, PCSK9 inhibitors are still underutilized in clinical practice, possibly due to a lack of awareness among care providers and cost concerns. Further research is needed to establish the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibitors in PAD patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease is a potentially lethal cardiovascular complication in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Anemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease among the hemodialysis population. However, whether blood hemoglobin concentration is associated with the risk of peripheral arterial disease progression in this population remains undetermined. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is an extension of a 4-year multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study to 10 years. A total of 3504 Japanese patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were recruited between 2006 and 2007. The primary exposure was blood hemoglobin concentration at baseline. The main outcome was the first-ever incidence of major adverse limb events (MALE), composed of endovascular treatment, bypass surgery, and amputation. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards model, restricted cubic spline analysis, and restricted mean survival time analysis were used to determine the association of blood hemoglobin concentration with the incidence of MALE. During a median follow-up of 8.0 years, 257 patients experienced MALE. A Cox proportional hazards model showed that the risk of MALE in patients with blood hemoglobin concentrations <10.0 g/dL was significantly higher than in patients with concentrations of 11.0 to 11.9 g/dL, even after adjusting for confounding factors. In contrast, elevated hemoglobin concentration (≥12.0 g/dL) was not significantly associated with increased risk of MALE. Similar associations were observed when the Fine-Gray subdistribution regression model was used by setting all-cause mortality as the competing risk. CONCLUSIONS: A low blood hemoglobin concentration is an independent risk factor for peripheral arterial disease progression in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

Asunto(s)

Hemoglobinas , Extremidad Inferior , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/sangre , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Incidencia , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Japón/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Anemia/epidemiología , Anemia/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Biomarcadores/sangre , Factores Sexuales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) is a modifiable factor that reduces mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease. We hypothesized preintervention OMT would be associated with improved 1-year reintervention and major adverse limb event (MALE) rates following elective endovascular revascularization for intermittent claudication (IC). METHODS: Using the Vascular Quality Initiative (2010-2020), we identified patients with IC undergoing elective endovascular, hybrid, and open surgical interventions. Preoperative antiplatelet, statin, and non-smoking status defined OMT components and created three groups: complete (all components), partial (1-2 components), and no OMT. The primary outcome was 1-year reintervention. Secondary outcomes included MALE and factors associated with OMT usage. Multivariable logistic regression generated adjusted odds ratios (aOR). RESULTS: 39,088 patients (14,907 [38.1%] complete, 22,054 [56.4%)] partial, 2,127 [5.4%] no OMT) met criteria. Patients with any OMT were more frequently older with more cardiovascular diseases and diabetes (p<0.0001). Patients without OMT were more likely to be Black or with Medicare/Medicaid (p<0.05). Observed 1-year reintervention (5.3% complete OMT, 6.1% partial OMT, 8.3% no OMT; p<0.001) and MALE (5.6% complete OMT, 6.3% partial OMT, 8.8% no OMT; p<0.001) were decreased by partial or complete OMT compared to no OMT. Complete OMT significantly reduced the adjusted odds of re-intervention and MALE by 28% (aOR=0.72, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.59-0.88) and 30% (aOR=0.70, 95%CI 0.58-0.85), respectively, compared to no OMT. Partial OMT reduced the adjusted odds of re-intervention and MALE by 24% (aOR=0.76, 95%CI 0.63-0.92) and 26% (aOR=0.74, 95%CI 0.62-0.89), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preintervention OMT is an underutilized, modifiable risk factor associated with improved one-year reintervention and MALE. Vascular surgeons are uniquely positioned to initiate and maintain OMT in patients with IC prior to revascularization to optimize patient outcomes.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The 2019 Global Vascular Guidelines recommended open bypass for patients at average risk with greater limb severity and anatomical complexity. However, the outcomes of tibial and pedal bypass (TPB) are inferior to those of above-the-knee surgical revascularization. This may be due to the technical difficulty and need for development of skills to perform TPB. However, there is a limited knowledge on the learning curve in TPB. Thus, the aim of the study is to assess this learning curve in a single-center retrospective analysis. METHODS: Cases treated with TPB with an autologous vein conduit in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) at a Japanese single center from 2009 to 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was the learning curve for TPB. RESULTS: The study included 449 TPB procedures conducted by a single main surgeon in patients with CLTI (median age, 75 years; 309 males; diabetes mellitus, 73%; end stage renal failure with hemodialysis, 44%). The operative time decreased significantly as the number of cases accumulated (p < .001). Using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) operative time, the learning curve was estimated to be phase 1 (initial learning curve) for 134 cases (1-134); phase 2 (competent period) for 179 cases (135-313); and phase 3 (mastery and challenging period) for 136 cases (314-449). The mean follow-up period was 34 ± 31 months. The 1- and 3-year limb salvage rates of 97% and 96% in phase 3 were significantly higher than those in phases 1 and 2 (p < .001, p = .029). Major adverse limb events (MALE) occurred in 117 (26%) patients, and the 1- and 3-year MALE rates of 10% and 17% in phase 3 were significantly lower than those in phases 1 and 2 (p < .001, p = .009). CONCLUSIONS: In the study, vascular surgeon required a learning curve of 134 TPB cases to Overcoming the learning curve for bypass was associated with improvement of medium-term outcomes for limb salvage and freedom from MALE.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The recent publication of randomized trials comparing open bypass surgery to endovascular therapy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, namely, Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) and Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg-2 (BASIL-2), has resulted in potentially contradictory findings. The trials differed significantly with respect to anatomical disease patterns and primary end points. We performed an analysis of patients in BEST-CLI with significant infrapopliteal disease undergoing open tibial bypass or endovascular tibial interventions to formulate a relevant comparator with the outcomes reported from BASIL-2. METHODS: The study population consisted of patients in BEST-CLI with adequate single segment saphenous vein conduit randomized to open bypass or endovascular intervention (cohort 1) who additionally had significant infrapopliteal disease and underwent tibial level intervention. The primary outcome was major adverse limb event (MALE) or all-cause death. MALE included any major limb amputation or major reintervention. Outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional regression models. RESULTS: The analyzed subgroup included a total of 665 patients with 326 in the open tibial bypass group and 339 in the tibial endovascular intervention group. The primary outcome of MALE or all-cause death at 3 years was significantly lower in the surgical group at 48.5% compared with 56.7% in the endovascular group (P = .0018). Mortality was similar between groups (35.5% open vs 35.8% endovascular; P = .94), whereas MALE events were lower in the surgical group (23.3% vs 35.0%; P<.0001). This difference included a lower rate of major reinterventions in the surgical group (10.9%) compared with the endovascular group (20.2%; P = .0006). Freedom from above ankle amputation or all-cause death was similar between treatment arms at 43.6% in the surgical group compared with 45.3% the endovascular group (P = .30); however, there were fewer above ankle amputations in the surgical group (13.5%) compared with the endovascular group (19.3%; P = .0205). Perioperative (30-day) death rates were similar between treatment groups (2.5% open vs 2.4% endovascular; P = .93), as was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (5.3% open vs 2.7% endovascular; P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with suitable single segment great saphenous vein who underwent infrapopliteal revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia, open bypass surgery was associated with a lower incidence of MALE or death and fewer major amputation compared with endovascular intervention. Amputation-free survival was similar between the groups. Further investigations into differences in comorbidities, anatomical extent, and lesion complexity are needed to explain differences between the BEST-CLI and BASIL-2 reported outcomes.

RESUMEN

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at high risk of major adverse limb events (MALEs) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). CHA2DS2-VASc is a prognostic score for atrial fibrillation stroke risk; however, no study has evaluated its predictive ability for MALEs and MACEs in PAD patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients from Taiwan with PAD. The patients were stratified into four risk groups based on their modified CHA2DS2-VASc score. Cox proportional hazard models, 10-fold cross-validation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were utilized to evaluate the predictive ability of CHA2DS2-VASc for MALEs, MACEs, and MALEs + MACEs. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the survival probability of the risk groups. CHA2DS2-VASc was found to be a significant predictor of MACEs (hazard ratio (HR) 3.52 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.00-12.12; p = 0.048), HR 4.18 (95% CI 1.19-14.36; p = 0.023), and HR 5.08 (95% CI 1.49-17.36; p = 0.009), for moderate-, high-, and very high-risk groups, respectively), while for MALEs and MALEs + MACEs, significance was achieved only for the high-risk group using a univariate model. For the multivariate adjusted model, the score was found to be a significant predictor of MACEs for only the very high-risk group, with an HR of 4.67 (95% CI 1.03-21.09; p = 0.045). The score demonstrated an AUC > 0.8, good discrimination (c-index > 0.8), and good calibration for predicting MACEs. However, it failed to achieve good performance for predicting MALEs and MALEs + MACEs. Based on all of the findings, CHA2DS2-VASc could potentially serve as a risk stratification score for predicting MACEs in patients with PAD, but it failed to qualify as a good predictor for MALEs.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) is increasingly used as a first line-treatment in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent CERAB compared with the gold standard of aortobifemoral bypass (ABF). METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for patients who underwent ABF or CERAB from 2009 to 2021. Propensity scores were generated using demographics, comorbidities, Rutherford class, and urgency. The two groups were matched using 5-to-1 nearest-neighbor match. Our primary outcomes were 1-year estimates of primary patency, major adverse limb events (MALEs), MALE-free survival, reintervention-free survival, and amputation-free survival. Standard statistical methods were used. RESULTS: A total of 3944 ABF and 281 CERAB cases were identified. Of all patients with AIOD, the proportion of CERAB increased from 0% to 17.9% between 2009 and 2021. Compared with ABF, patients who underwent CERAB were more likely to be older (64.7 vs 60.2; P < .001) and more often had diabetes (40.9% vs 24.1%; P < .001) and end-stage renal disease (1.1% vs 0.3%; P = .03). In the matched analysis (229 CERAB vs 929 ABF), ABF patients had improved MALE-free survival (93.2% [±0.9%] vs 83.2% [±3%]; P < .001) and lower rates of MALE (5.2% [±0.9%] vs 14.1% [±3%]; P < .001), with comparable primary patency rates (98.3% [±0.3%] vs 96.6% [±1%]; P = .6) and amputation-free survival (99.3% [±0.3%] vs 99.4% [±0.6%]; P = .9). Patients in the CERAB group had significantly lower reintervention-free survival (62.5% [±6%] vs 92.9% [±0.9%]; P < .001). Matched analysis also revealed shorter length of stay (1 vs 7 days; P < .001), as well as lower pulmonary (1.2% vs 6.6%; P = .01), renal (1.8% vs 10%; P < .001), and cardiac (1.8% vs 12.8%; P < .001) complications among CERAB patients. CONCLUSIONS: CERAB had lower perioperative morbidity compared with ABF with a similar primary patency 1-year estimates. However, patients who underwent CERAB experienced more major adverse limb events and reinterventions. Although CERAB is an effective treatment for patients with AIOD, further studies are needed to determine the long-term outcomes of CERAB compared with the established durability of ABF and further define the role of CEARB in the treatment of AIOD.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades de la Aorta , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Femoral , Recuperación del Miembro , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Aorta/mortalidad , Enfermedades de la Aorta/fisiopatología , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Amputación Quirúrgica , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Arteria Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Medición de Riesgo , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/fisiopatología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/mortalidad , Prótesis Vascular , Resultado del Tratamiento , Bases de Datos Factuales , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk for peripheral artery disease (PAD) and its complications. Arterial calcification and non-compressibility may limit test interpretation in this population. Developing tools capable of identifying PAD and predicting major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and limb event (MALE) outcomes among patients with DM would be clinically useful. Deep neural network analysis of resting Doppler arterial waveforms was used to detect PAD among patients with DM and to identify those at greatest risk for major adverse outcome events. METHODS: Consecutive patients with DM undergoing lower limb arterial testing (April 1, 2015-December 30, 2020) were randomly allocated to training, validation, and testing subsets (60%, 20%, and 20%). Deep neural networks were trained on resting posterior tibial arterial Doppler waveforms to predict all-cause mortality, MACE, and MALE at 5 years using quartiles based on the distribution of the prediction score. RESULTS: Among 11,384 total patients, 4211 patients with DM met study criteria (mean age, 68.6 ± 11.9 years; 32.0% female). After allocating the training and validation subsets, the final test subset included 856 patients. During follow-up, there were 262 deaths, 319 MACE, and 99 MALE. Patients in the upper quartile of prediction based on deep neural network analysis of the posterior tibial artery waveform provided independent prediction of death (hazard ratio [HR], 3.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.31-5.56), MACE (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.49-2.91), and MALE (HR, 13.50; 95% CI, 5.83-31.27). CONCLUSIONS: An artificial intelligence enabled analysis of a resting Doppler arterial waveform permits identification of major adverse outcomes including all-cause mortality, MACE, and MALE among patients with DM.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Medición de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Aprendizaje Profundo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Pronóstico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Tiempo , Arterias Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Tibiales/fisiopatología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiopatías Diabéticas/mortalidad , Angiopatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and end-stage kidney disease are a high-risk population, and concomitant atherosclerosis in coronary arteries (CAD) or cerebral arteries (CVD) is common. The aim of the study was to assess long-term outcomes of PAD and the impact of coexistent CAD and CVD on outcomes. METHODS: The United States Renal Data System was used to identify patients with PAD within 6 months of incident dialysis. Four groups were formed: PAD alone, PAD with CAD, PAD with CVD, and PAD with CAD and CVD. PAD-specific outcomes (chronic limb-threatening ischemia, major amputation, percutaneous/surgical revascularization, and their composite, defined as major adverse limb events [MALE]) as well as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke were studied. RESULTS: The study included 106,567 patients (mean age, 71.2 years; 40.8% female) with a median follow-up of 546 days (interquartile range, 214-1096 days). Most patients had PAD and CAD (49.8%), 25.8% had PAD alone, and 19.2% had all three territories involved. MALE rate in patients with PAD was 22.3% and 35.0% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. In comparison to PAD alone, the coexistence of both CAD and CVD (ie, polyvascular disease) was associated with a higher adjusted rates of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.31), myocardial infarction (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.69-1.88), stroke (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.52,1.80), and MALE (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with end-stage kidney disease have a high burden of PAD with poor long-term outcomes, which worsen, in an incremental fashion, with the involvement of each additional diseased arterial bed.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Fallo Renal Crónico , Infarto del Miocardio , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano , Masculino , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with peripheral artery disease are at increased risk for major adverse cardiac events, major adverse limb events, and all-cause death. Developing tools capable of identifying those patients with peripheral artery disease at greatest risk for major adverse events is the first step for outcome prevention. This study aimed to determine whether computer-assisted analysis of a resting Doppler waveform using deep neural networks can accurately identify patients with peripheral artery disease at greatest risk for adverse outcome events. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (April 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020) undergoing ankle-brachial index testing were included. Patients were randomly allocated to training, validation, and testing subsets (60%/20%/20%). Deep neural networks were trained on resting posterior tibial arterial Doppler waveforms to predict major adverse cardiac events, major adverse limb events, and all-cause death at 5 years. Patients were then analyzed in groups based on the quartiles of each prediction score in the training set. Among 11 384 total patients, 10 437 patients met study inclusion criteria (mean age, 65.8±14.8 years; 40.6% women). The test subset included 2084 patients. During 5 years of follow-up, there were 447 deaths, 585 major adverse cardiac events, and 161 MALE events. After adjusting for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index, deep neural network analysis of the posterior tibial artery waveform provided independent prediction of death (hazard ratio [HR], 2.44 [95% CI, 1.78-3.34]), major adverse cardiac events (HR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.49-2.61]), and major adverse limb events (HR, 11.03 [95% CI, 5.43-22.39]) at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: An artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of Doppler arterial waveforms enables identification of major adverse outcomes among patients with peripheral artery disease, which may promote early adoption and adherence of risk factor modification.

Asunto(s)

Inteligencia Artificial , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Masculino , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Riesgo

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atherectomy use in treatment of femoropopliteal disease has significantly increased despite scant evidence of benefit to long-term clinical outcomes. AIMS: We investigated the clinical benefits of atherectomy over standard treatment for femoropopliteal interventions. METHODS: Using data from the Society of Vascular Surgery's Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry, we identified patients who underwent isolated femoropopliteal interventions for occlusive disease. We compared 13,423 patients treated with atherectomy with 47,371 receiving standard treatment; both groups were allowed definitive treatment with a drug-coated balloon or stenting. The primary endpoint was major adverse limb events (MALEs), which is a composite of target vessel re-occlusion, ipsilateral major amputation, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: Mean age was 69 ± 11 years, and patients were followed for a median of 30 months. Overall rates of complications were slightly higher in the atherectomy group than the standard treatment group (6.2% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, after adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, atherectomy use was associated with a 13% reduction in risk of MALEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.98). Rates of major and minor amputations were significantly lower in the atherectomy group (3.2% vs. 4.6% and 3.3% vs. 4.3%, respectively, both p < 0.001), primarily driven by a significantly decreased risk of major amputations (aOR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.91). There were no differences in 30-day mortality, primary patency, and target vessel revascularization between the atherectomy and standard treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In adults undergoing femoropopliteal interventions, the use of atherectomy was associated with a reduction in MALEs compared with standard treatment.

Asunto(s)

Angioplastia de Balón , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aterectomía/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Factores de Riesgo

RESUMEN

AIM: The objective in this study was to assess the clinical and economic implications of the inclusion of rivaroxaban as a secondary prophylaxis in patients with chronic or symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the United States (US). METHODS: A cost-consequence model was adapted to evaluate the economic impact of rivaroxaban plus aspirin in a hypothetical 1-million-member health plan. The model inputs were taken from multiple sources: efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban + aspirin vs. aspirin alone were abstracted from COMPASS and VOYAGER randomized clinical trials; the prevalence of chronic and symptomatic PAD and incidence rates of clinical events (major adverse cardiac events [MACE], major adverse limb events [MALE], and major bleeding), were abstracted from the analysis of claims data; healthcare costs of clinical events and wholesale acquisition costs for rivaroxaban were abstracted from the literature and Red Book, respectively (2022 USD). One-way sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: Over one year, with a 5% uptake of rivaroxaban, the model estimated rivaroxaban + aspirin to reduce 21 MACE/MALE events in the PAD patient population. The reduction in these clinical events offsets the increased risk of major bleeding (16 additional events), demonstrating a positive health benefit of the rivaroxaban addition. These benefits led to a $0.27 incremental cost per member per month (PMPM) to a US plan. The major driver of the incremental cost was the cost of rivaroxaban. In a subgroup of patients with the presence of any high-risk factor (heart failure, diabetes, renal insufficiency, or history of vascular disease affecting two or more vascular beds), the incremental PMPM cost was $0.13. CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban + aspirin was found to provide positive net clinical benefit on the annual number of MACE/MALE avoided, with a modest increase in the PMPM cost.

Asunto(s)

Aspirina , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico

Asunto(s)

Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Lipoproteína(a) , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo

RESUMEN

Presence of polyvascular disease, diabetes, heart failure, or renal insufficiency in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are associated with increased risks of adverse events, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major adverse limb events (MALEs). In this retrospective observational study using administrative claims data from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database from January 2016 to September 2021, we described the incidence rates of MACEs, MALEs, and major thrombotic vascular events in patients with CAD or PAD stratified by the presence of risk factors (i.e., polyvascular disease, diabetes, heart failure, or renal insufficiency). A total of 1,435,241 patients (77% CAD and 34% PAD) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients with 0 risk factors were deemed the low-risk group (47%; n = 681,333) and patients with ≥1 risk factor were deemed the high-risk group (53%; n = 753,908). The mean age was 71.8 and 73.6 years, and 42% and 44% were female in the low- and high-risk groups, respectively. Compared with the low-risk group, the high-risk group had a 72% higher hazard of developing MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.70 to 1.74), 82% higher hazard of developing major thrombotic vascular events (1.82, 1.80 to 1.84), and 146% higher hazard of developing MALEs (2.46, 2.39 to 2.53) (all p <0.001). In conclusion, in patients with CAD or PAD, the presence of 1 or more risk factors was associated with higher risks of MACEs, MALEs, and major thrombotic vascular events, underscoring the need to improve management of underlying diseases in this population.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Insuficiencia Renal , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Incidencia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal/complicaciones

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of combined atherectomy and stenting relative to use of each procedure alone for the treatment of lower extremity peripheral artery disease has not been evaluated. AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term major adverse limb event (MALE) following the receipt of stenting, atherectomy, and the combination of stent and atherectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients undergoing atherectomy, stent, and combination stent atherectomy for lower extremity peripheral artery disease was derived from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) data set. The primary outcome was MALE and was assessed in the short-term and long-term. Short-term MALE was assessed immediately following the procedure to discharge and estimated using logistic regression. Long-term MALE was assessed after discharge to end of follow-up and estimated using the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model. RESULTS: Among the 46,108 included patients, 6896 (14.95%) underwent atherectomy alone, 35,774 (77.59%) received a stent, and 3438 (7.5%) underwent a combination of stenting and atherectomy. The adjusted model indicated a significantly higher odds of short-term MALE in the atherectomy group (OR = 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.16-1.57), and not significantly different odds (OR = 0.93; 95% CI:0.77-1.13) in the combination stent and atherectomy group when compared to stenting alone. With regard to long-term MALE, the model indicated that the likelihood of experiencing the outcome was slightly lower (HR = 0.90; 95% CI:0.82-0.98) in the atherectomy group, and not significantly different (HR = 0.92; 95% CI:0.82-1.04) in the combination stent and atherectomy group when compared to the stent group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the VQI data set who received combination stenting and atherectomy did not experience significantly different rates of MALE when compared with stenting alone. It is crucial to consider and further evaluate the influence of anatomical characteristics on treatment strategies and potential differential effects of comorbidities and other demographic factors on the short and long-term MALE risks.

Asunto(s)

Arteria Femoral , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Aterectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Stents

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) results from the systemic atherosclerotic process. In this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between plasma atherogenic index (AIP), a ratio of molar concentrations of triglycerides to HDL-cholesterol, and long-term outcomes after endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenosis. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 673 patients who underwent EVT for PAD in our tertiary center between January 2015 and December 2020. In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the AIP value with the optimum cutoff value was determined as 0.576 to detect the presence of major adverse limb events (MALEs). Patients were divided into two groups according to low AIP (<0.576 as group 1) and high AIP (>0.576 as group 2). RESULTS: Among the major endpoints, long-term restenosis rates were significantly higher in patients in the high-AIP group than in the low-AIP group (p<.001). The lower extremity amputation rate was not statistically significant between the two groups. All-cause mortality rate (54 (31.6) versus 117 (68.4), p<.001) was significantly higher in patients in the high-AIP group than in the low-AIP group. In addition, the MALE rate (94 (29.2) versus 218 (62.1), p<.001) was significantly higher in patients in the high-AIP group than in those in the low-AIP group. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we found that AIP is a significant independent predictor of long-term MALE in patients who underwent EVT for SFA.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lower-extremity endovascular revascularization (LER) is often required for diabetic patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). During the post-revascularization period patients may unpredictably experience major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). Several families of cytokines are involved in the inflammatory process that underlies the progression of atherosclerosis. According to current evidence, we have identified a panel of possible biomarkers related with the risk of developing MACE and MALE after LER. The aim was to study the relationship between a panel of biomarkers - Interleukin-1 (IL-1) and 6 (IL-6), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α), High-Mobility Group Box-1 (HMGB-1), Osteoprotegerin (OPG), Sortilin and Omentin-1- at baseline, with cardiovascular outcomes (MACE and MALE) after LER in diabetic patients with CLTI. METHODS: In this prospective non-randomized study, 264 diabetic patients with CLTI undergoing endovascular revascularization were enrolled. Serum levels of each biomarker were collected before revascularization and outcomes' incidence was evaluated after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 42 cases of MACE and 81 cases of MALE occurred. There was a linear association for each biomarker at baseline and incident MACE and MALE, except Omentin-1 levels that were inversely related to the presence of MACE or MALE. After adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, the association between each biomarker baseline level and outcomes remained significant in multivariable analysis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) models were constructed using traditional clinical and laboratory risk factors and the inclusion of biomarkers significantly improved the prediction of incident events. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated IL-1, IL-6, CRP, TNF-α, HMGB-1, OPG and Sortilin levels and low Omentin-1 levels at baseline correlate with worse vascular outcomes in diabetic patients with CLTI undergoing LER. Assessment of the inflammatory state with this panel of biomarkers may support physicians to identify a subset of patients more susceptible to the procedure failure and to develop cardiovascular adverse events after LER.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Factores de Riesgo , Interleucina-6 , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reactiva , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Interleucina-1

Asunto(s)

Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Extremidades/irrigación sanguínea , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, and those with disease in the lower extremities are at risk of major adverse limb events primarily driven by atherothrombosis. Traditionally, PAD refers to diseases of the arteries outside of the coronary circulation, including carotid, visceral and lower extremity peripheral artery disease, and the heterogeneity of PAD patients is represented by different atherothrombotic pathophysiology, clinical features and related antithrombotic strategies. The risk in this diverse population includes systemic risk of cardiovascular events as well as risk related to the diseased territory (e.g., artery to artery embolic stroke for patients with carotid disease, lower extremity artery to artery embolism and atherothrombosis in patients with lower extremity disease). Moreover, until the last decade, clinical data on antithrombotic management of PAD patients have been drawn from subanalyses of randomized clinical trials addressing patients affected by coronary artery disease. The high prevalence and related poor prognosis in PAD patients highlight the pivotal role of tailored antithrombotic therapy in patients affected by cerebrovascular, aortic and lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Thus, the proper assessment of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk in patients with PAD represents a key clinical challenge that must be met to permit the optimal antithrombotic prescription for the various clinical settings in daily practice. The aim of this updated review is to analyze different features of atherothrombotic disease as well as current evidence of antithrombotic management in asymptomatic and secondary prevention in PAD patients according to each arterial bed.