RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This qualitative study aims to assess perspectives of clinicians and clinic staff on mail-order pharmacy dispensing for medication abortion. METHODS: Participants included clinicians and staff involved in implementing a mail-order dispensing model for medication abortion at eleven clinics in seven states as part of a prospective cohort study, which began in January 2020 (before the FDA removed the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone). From June 2021 to July 2022, we invited participants at the participating clinics, including six primary care and five abortion clinics, to complete a semi-structured video interview about their experiences. We then conducted qualitative thematic analysis of interview data, summarizing themes related to perceived benefits and concerns about the mail-order model, perceived patient interest, and potential barriers to larger-scale implementation. RESULTS: We conducted 24 interviews in total with clinicians (13 physicians and one nurse practitioner) and clinic staff (n = 10). Participants highlighted perceived benefits of the mail-order model, including its potential to expand abortion services into primary care, increase patient autonomy and privacy, and to normalize abortion services. They also highlighted key logistical, clinical, and feasibility concerns about the mail-order model, and specific challenges related to integrating abortion into primary care. CONCLUSION: Clinicians and clinic staff working in primary care and abortion clinics were optimistic that mail-order dispensing of medication abortion can improve the ability of some providers to provide abortion and enable more patients to access services. The feasibility of mail-order pharmacy dispensing of medication abortion following the Supreme Court Dobbs decision is to be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Clinicaltrials.gov. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03913104. Date of registration: first submitted on April 3, 2019 and first posted on April 12, 2019.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: The establishment of a new outpatient pharmacy provided a strategic opportunity to repurpose and convert an existing outpatient pharmacy into a closed-door mail-order pharmacy within a health system. This article describes the steps taken to successfully make this change and evaluates the impact. SUMMARY: The mail-order pharmacy conversion project was divided into 3 phases: phase 1 (before conversion) from July through August 2022, phase 2 (conversion) from October through November 2022, and phase 3 (after conversion) from December 2022 through February 2023. Phase 1 included standardizing workflows with standard operating procedure (SOP) development, improving automation, determining staffing ratios, gathering baseline staff engagement data, and identifying primary and secondary outcomes of interest. Phase 2 encompassed SOP implementation and training of mail-order team members. Phase 3 involved evaluating available pharmacy floorspace, marketing mail-order services, and the second distribution of the staff engagement survey. The measured outcomes of this project were total prescription volumes, increase in total revenue, and staff engagement. Data collection was completed in phase 3. CONCLUSION: The existing outpatient pharmacy was successfully converted to a closed-door pharmacy, and the associated prescription volume increased. Developing a strategic action plan to establish SOPs, calculate staffing performance metrics, and identify opportunities for growth and engaging frontline team members were essential to the success of this project.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Medication nonadherence is a multifactorial healthcare problem that contributes to increased healthcare costs and morbidity. To improve medication adherence, specialty pharmacies offer services not typically provided by retail pharmacies such as benefits investigation, financial assistance, medication synchronization, and proactive refill reminders. This study assessed the impact of the specialty pharmacy care model on medication adherence for patients on nonspecialty medications. METHODS: This study was a quasi-experimental cohort comparison of patients who were transferred from a health-system retail pharmacy to a health-system specialty pharmacy between April 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021. The primary endpoint in this study was the difference in mean medication adherence proportion of days covered (PDC) between the post-transfer and pretransfer periods. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with PDC of greater than 80%, medication adherence by drug group, shipment volumes, number of medications per shipment, and the mean copay per medication. RESULTS: In this study of 163 patients, use of a specialty pharmacy care model led to a significant increase of 7.0% in mean PDC, a significant increase in the percentage of patients with PDC of greater than 80%, a significant decrease in the number of shipments per 30 days per patient, a significant increase in the number of medications included per shipment, and a significant reduction in the mean copay per medication. CONCLUSION: The findings in this study suggest that the application of the specialty pharmacy care model to nonspecialty pharmacy patients may improve medication adherence, decrease the number of shipments per patient sent from the pharmacy, and reduce patient copays.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE(S): To estimate the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of medication abortion with mifepristone dispensed by a mail-order pharmacy after in-person clinical assessment. STUDY DESIGN: This is an interim analysis of an ongoing prospective cohort study conducted at five sites. Clinicians assessed patients in clinic and, if they were eligible for medication abortion and ≤ 63 days' gestation, electronically sent prescriptions for mifepristone 200 mg orally and misoprostol 800 mcg buccally to a mail-order pharmacy, which shipped medications for next-day delivery. Participants completed surveys three and 14 days after enrollment, and we abstracted medical chart data. RESULTS: Between January 2020 and April 2021 we enrolled 240 participants and obtained clinical outcome information for 227 (94.6%); 3 reported not taking either medication. Of those with abortion outcome information (N = 224), 216 (96.4%) completed day-3 and 212 (94.6%) day-14 surveys. Of the 224 that took medications, none reported taking past 70 days' gestation, and complete medication abortion occurred for 217 participants (96.9%, 95% CI 93.7%-98.7%). Most received medications within three days (82.1%, 95% CI 76.5%-86.9%). In the day-3 survey, 95.4% (95% CI 91.7%-97.8%) reported being very (88.4%) or somewhat (6.9%) satisfied with receiving medications by mail. In the day-14 survey, 89.6% (95% CI 84.7%-93.4%) said they would use the mail-order service again if needed. Eleven (4.9%, 95% CI 2.5%-8.6%) experienced adverse events; two were serious (one blood transfusion, one hospitalization), and none were related to mail-order pharmacy dispensing. CONCLUSIONS: Medication abortion with mail-order pharmacy dispensing of mifepristone appears effective, feasible, and acceptable to patients. IMPLICATIONS: The in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone, codified in the drug's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, should be removed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mail order pharmacy (MOP) use has been linked to improved medication adherence and health outcomes among patients with diabetes. However, no large-scale intervention studies have assessed the effect of encouraging MOP use on medication adherence. OBJECTIVE: To assess an intervention to encourage MOP services to increase its use and medication adherence. DESIGN: Randomized encouragement trial. PATIENTS: 63,012 diabetes patients from three health care systems: Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), Kaiser Permanente Hawaii (KPHI), and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (HPHC) who were poorly adherent to at least one class of cardiometabolic medications and had not used MOP in the prior 12 months. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive either usual care (control arm) or outreach encouraging MOP use consisting of a mailed letter, secure email message, and automated telephone call outlining the potential benefits of MOP use (intervention arm). HPHC intervention patients received the letter only. MEASUREMENTS: We compared the percentages of patients that began using MOP and that became adherent to cardiometabolic medication classes during a 12-month follow-up period. We also conducted a race/ethnicity-stratified analysis. RESULTS: During follow-up, 10.6% of intervention patients began using MOP vs. 9.3% of controls (p < 0.01); the percent of cardiometabolic medication delivered via mail was 42.1% vs. 39.8% (p < 0.01). Metformin adherence improved in the intervention arm relative to control at the two KP sites (52% vs. 49%, p < 0.01). Stratified analyses suggested a significant positive effect of the intervention in White (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.22) and Asian (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.45) patients. CONCLUSION: This pragmatic trial showed that simple outreach to encourage MOP modestly increased its use and improved adherence measured by refills to a key class of diabetes medications in some settings. Given its minimal cost, clinicians and health systems should consider outreach interventions to actively promote MOP use among diabetes patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT02621476.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Some classes of drugs have lower than optimal uptake of generic products. We aimed to understand the determinants of generic drug substitution across classes. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2013 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database from Truven Health Analytics. We quantified generic substitution rates (GSR) for 26 drug classes, choosing one representative week in November 2013. We used mixed-effects logistic regression to estimate the independent relationship between the determinants of interest and generic substitution for 8 classes with low generic utilization. RESULTS: The GSRs for most classes exceeded 90%, although some were much lower including thyroid hormones (64%), androgens (74%), estrogens (71%), and hydantoin-type anticonvulsants (72%). The determinants of generic substitution varied across classes, albeit with important patterns. Patients using a mail order pharmacy had significantly less generic substitution than patients filling at retail pharmacies for 5 of the 8 studied classes; two additional classes showed no relationship between pharmacy type and generic use. Men relative to women and patients taking more medications were more likely to use generics for most classes. State substitution laws and patient consent laws were largely inconsequential regarding generic substitution. CONCLUSIONS: Policies are needed to support the use of safe, effective and often lower cost generic drugs, when available. Mail order pharmacies, as often required by pharmacy benefits managers, lessen generic use for many classes. These pharmacies may require additional regulatory oversight if this adversely impacts patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of research on the population characteristics of mail-order pharmacy users. OBJECTIVE: This study utilized a nationally representative sample to examine the characteristics of mail-order pharmacy users. METHODS: This study used data from the 2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The outcome variable was defined as whether the participant had used a mail-order pharmacy during the study year. Logistic regression was conducted to determine the factors which influence mail-order pharmacy use. All analyses incorporated MEPS sampling weights to adjust for the complex survey design. RESULTS: Among the 14,106 adults included, approximately 18% of them had used a mail-order pharmacy at least once to fill their prescription in 2012. Compared to community pharmacy users, mail-order pharmacy users were more likely to be white, older, married, have a higher family income, a higher educational level, have health insurance, and have a prescription with at least a 30-day supply. There is no difference in gender or urban/rural disparity. In addition, mail-order pharmacy users had a lower percentage of out-of-pocket costs. CONCLUSION: Mail-order pharmacy use was significantly associated with certain patient characteristics. Policymakers should consider these characteristics when promoting mail-order pharmacy use.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The development and implementation of centralized mail-order pharmacy services in an academic healthcare system are described. SUMMARY: The use of mail-order pharmacy services continues to increase, as mail-order services offer patient benefits such as reduced copayments and improved clinical outcomes. Prior to undertaking an initiative to improve its mail-order pharmacy services, the University of Utah Health system's pharmacy department offered decentralized mail-order pharmacy services at all of its retail pharmacies, but there was no standardized process for processing mail-order prescriptions or providing phone support to mail-order patients. Centralized mail-order pharmacy services were developed and implemented by creating (1) a standard process for mail-order pharmacy services, (2) a centralized mail-order prescription filling center, and (3) a call center to support mail-order pharmacy services. Implementation of centralized mail-order pharmacy services resulted in an almost 50% reduction in time spent by pharmacy team members on mail-order prescription filling and packaging tasks. Use of a central call center resulted in a decreased call abandonment rate and contributed to a decreased pharmacy workload resulting from an overall reduction in call volume due to an increased rate of first-call issue resolution. CONCLUSION: Establishment of a centralized mail-order pharmacy service along with operational and infrastructure improvements resulted in improved quality and regulatory compliance and enhanced labor efficiency and patient communication.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medication non-adherence is a major contributor to poor outcomes in diabetes. Previous research has shown an association between use of mail order pharmacy delivery and better medication adherence, but little is known about the barriers and facilitators to mail order pharmacy use in diabetes patients. This qualitative study examined factors related to mail order pharmacy use versus traditional "brick and mortar" pharmacies to refill prescriptions. METHODS: We conducted four 90-min focus groups in 2016 among 28 diabetes patients in the Hawaii and Northern California regions of Kaiser Permanente, a large integrated health care delivery system. We queried participants on their preferred mode for refilling prescriptions and perceived barriers and facilitators of mail order pharmacy use. One researcher independently coded each focus group transcript, with two of these transcripts double-coded by a second researcher to promote reliability. We employed thematic analysis guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior (COM-B) framework using NVivo 11 software. RESULTS: A total of 28 diabetes patients participated. Participants' average age was 64.1 years; 57% were female; and racial/ethnic backgrounds included Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (36%), Black/African-American (21%) Hispanic/Latino (7%), and non-Hispanic White (36%). Analysis uncovered 26 themes related to the decision to use mail order pharmacy, with each theme representing a barrier or facilitator mapped to the COM-B framework. Most themes (20/26) fell into the COM-B category of 'Opportunity.' Opportunity barriers to mail order pharmacy use included unpredictability of medication delivery date, concerns about mail security, and difficulty coordinating refill orders for multiple prescriptions. In contrast, facilitators included greater access and convenience (e.g., no need to wait in line or arrange transportation) compared to traditional pharmacies. Motivational facilitators to mail order pharmacy use included receiving a pharmacy benefit plan incentive of a free one-month supply of prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that while patients with diabetes may benefit from mail order pharmacy use, they perceive numerous barriers to using the service. These findings will inform the design of interventions and quality improvement initiatives to increase mail order pharmacy use, which in turn may improve medication adherence and outcomes in diabetes patients, across health care systems.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oral chemotherapy agents are being prescribed more frequently in many cancer types. In-office dispensing of oral chemotherapy agents has demonstrated clinical benefits and also shown financial benefit to third-party payers. A previous publication estimated over $200,000 in cost savings annually from in-office dispensing solely from medications returned to stock for credit. However, pharmacists in the in-office setting perform many other interventions that may affect financial outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Assess financial impact of oral chemotherapy in-office dispensing by a clinic-based oral chemotherapy program serving five outpatient cancer centers in Southern Idaho. Outcomes include calculated monetary waste and cost avoidance of oral chemotherapy prescriptions from in-office dispensing and mail-order pharmacies. METHODS: Prescriptions received by the clinic-based oral chemotherapy program for filling through in-office dispensing and mail-order pharmacies were monitored for monetary waste and cost avoidance events from December 2016 through May 2017. Information was collected on the number of returned medications, therapy discontinuations, and dose adjustments. Monetary outcomes were calculated using average wholesale price. RESULTS: During the six-month evaluation, prescriptions filled through in-office dispensing had a total cost avoidance of $1,020,193 (n = 154) and total waste of $154,985 (n = 36) resulting in an estimated net cost avoidance annually of $1,730,416. Prescriptions filled through mail-order had a total cost avoidance of $20,497 (n = 4) and a total waste of $80,394 (n = 15) resulting in an estimated $119,794 net annual waste. CONCLUSIONS: In-office dispensing of oral chemotherapy provided significant cost savings to third-party payers compared to mail-order pharmacy dispensing. Continued evaluation may help further justify the importance and value of in-office dispensing.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mail order pharmacies (MOP) are increasingly being used to deliver medications for chronic disease management. Their use is linked to similar or even greater medication adherence than local pharmacy (LP) use. We are unaware of any studies that have evaluated the association of mail order pharmacy use with drug adherence among stroke patients. METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional analyses of patients discharged with ischemic stroke from 24 hospitals in a managed care network, who received a new anticoagulant, antiplatelet, anti-glycemic, antihypertensive, and/or lipid-lowering medication between January 1, 2007 and June 30, 2015. We defined good adherence as medication availability ≥80% of the time, and compared adherence between mail-order users (≥66% of refills by mail) and local pharmacy users (all refills in person). Relationship between delivery method and adherence was evaluated using multivariate regression models. RESULTS: A total of 44,658 eligible patients refilled an index medication. Of these, 13,295 in the LP and 6801 in MOP groups met inclusion criteria. Patients in the MOP group were more likely to be white, and less likely to have hypertension, diabetes, and smoke tobacco. Continuous Medication Gap (CMG) adherence was 0.28 in the LP group and 0.11 in the MOP group (p < 0.001). At 90-days there were 893 hospital readmissions for the LP group and 375 for the MOP group for a rate of 0.07 vs 0.06 (p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, adherence was associated with MOP use, (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.11-0.14) and decreased readmission at 90 days (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Stroke patients who use MOP vs. LP are more likely to have good medication adherence. Future studies should examine the impact of mail-order pharmacy use on vascular risk marker control and events after stroke.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The VA system is the largest single provider of healthcare in the United States and to individuals infected with HIV specifically. High quality medication management is particularly important since HIV is a chronic infectious condition which requires taking multiple medications with strict requirements for adherence to medication regimens. Veterans Administration (VA) patients are required to obtain all chronic medications using the VA mail-order pharmacy system. OBJECTIVE: Drawing on Donabedian's Quality Improvement framework, this study sought to examine experiences that Veterans with HIV have with the Veterans Administration medication mail-order system, and to explore opportunities for quality improvement. METHODS: A sequential, explanatory mixed-methods design was used to interview Veterans receiving care at a Midwestern Veterans Administration Hospital using a mail-order experience survey followed by in-depth interviews. All 57 Veterans, out of 72, who were successfully contacted consented to participate. RESULTS: Overall, Veterans evaluated the mail-order service positively and valued the accuracy (correct medication delivery). However, a notable problem emerged with respect to assuring access to HIV medications with about half (47%) indicating running out of HIV medication. Respondents identified structural issues with respect to days covered by mailed medications (90 versus current 30 days) and process issues with scheduling new refills. Veterans also indicated the information sheets were too long, complex and not helpful for their queries. Patients were open to pharmacists playing an active role during clinic visits and felt this would help manage their conditions better. CONCLUSIONS: Veterans generally reported that the VA Mail-order service was of high quality. However, some findings indicate there are opportunities to improve this service to be more patient-centered particularly for vulnerable HIV patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Falsified pharmaceutical products are multi-faceted and driven by great criminal power. The health risks for patients who are frequently very seriously ill are high. The problem in Europe has been recognised. The European Union has created statutory requirements that considerably improve and tighten the system of manufacturing, distribution and documentation, and of pharmaceutical product authorisations. The traceability of each package via safety features is strengthened and made binding by detailed delegated legislation. Implementation is in progress. An publicly accessible database on good manufacturing and distribution practice (GMDP) is intended to optimise control not only by the authorities but also by concerned groups. The distance selling of medicinal products by mail order pharmacies has been tightened and unified (harmonized). Uniform logos throughout Europe are intended to make it easier for consumers to distinguish between legal and illegal sources. The transformation is in full swing. The European Commission will be documenting the success of the measures in a report.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background. Direct-to-consumer sale of prescription medications by pharmaceutical companies has emerged as a novel delivery method. It is important to ensure that patients who choose this method are receiving adequate pharmaceutical care that meets established practice standards. Objective. The objective of this study was to assess consultation for patients who are receiving medications via direct-to-consumer sales of prescription drugs from pharmaceutical companies. Methods. We conducted a blinded telephone survey using 10 mock prescriptions for simulated patients (secret shoppers) by contacting the 2 companies currently offering prescription medications for sale directly to consumers. Results. Simulated patients in this pilot study only had a pharmacist initiate consultation for 20% of the calls. Multiple pharmacy technicians offered consultation and this behavior does not follow state statutes. In addition, technicians also failed to forward calls to the pharmacist-on-duty, instead suggesting the patients contact their physicians. On a further direct request to speak to a pharmacist, a consultation did occur for 90% of the calls. However, the consultation failed to achieve practice standards set by Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 and the state statutes for the majority of the encounters. Conclusion. These results warrant a larger scale study of consultation for direct-to-consumer prescription sales. In addition, they highlight areas for training needed for all pharmacy personnel who work in this venue.

RESUMEN

Live poultry-associated salmonellosis is an emerging public health issue in the United States. Public and animal health officials collaborated to investigate one of the largest (356 cases, 39 states) of these outbreaks reported to date. A case was defined as illness in a person infected with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Typhimurium with illness onset between 1 March and 22 October 2013. The median patient age was seven years (range: < 1-87 years); 58% of ill persons were children ≤ 10 years, 51% were female, 25% were hospitalized; 189 (76%) of 250 patients reported live poultry exposure in the week before illness; and 149 (95%) of 157 reported purchasing live poultry from agricultural feed stores. Traceback investigations identified 18 live poultry sources, including 16 mail-order hatcheries. Environmental sampling was conducted at two mail-order hatcheries. One (2.5%) of 40 duplicate samples collected at one hatchery yielded the outbreak strain. Live poultry are an important source of human salmonellosis, particularly among children, highlighting the need for educational campaigns and comprehensive interventions at the mail-order hatchery and agricultural feed store levels. Prevention and control efforts depend on a One Health approach, involving cooperation between public and animal health officials, industry, health professionals, and consumers.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a pharmacy benefit change on mail order pharmacy (MOP) uptake. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Race-stratified, random sample of diabetes patients in an integrated health care delivery system. STUDY DESIGN: In this natural experiment, we studied the impact of a pharmacy benefit change that conditionally discounted medications if patients used MOP and prepaid two copayments. We compared MOP uptake among those exposed to the benefit change (n = 2,442) and the reference group with no benefit change (n = 8,148), and estimated differential MOP uptake across social strata using a difference-in-differences framework. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Ascertained MOP uptake (initiation among previous nonusers). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Thirty percent of patients started using MOP after receiving the benefit change versus 9 percent uptake among the reference group (p < .0001). After adjustment, there was a 26 percentage point greater MOP uptake (benefit change effect). This benefit change effect was significantly smaller among patients with inadequate health literacy (15 percent less), limited English proficiency (14 percent less), and among Latinos and Asians (24 and 16 percent less compared to Caucasians). CONCLUSIONS: Conditionally discounting medications delivered by MOP effectively stimulated MOP uptake overall, but it unintentionally widened previously existing social gaps in MOP use because it stimulated less MOP uptake in vulnerable populations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Automatic dispensing machines (ADMs) used in pharmacies concentrate and dispense large volumes of pharmaceuticals, including uncoated tablets that can shed dust. We evaluated 43 employees' exposures to pharmaceutical dust at three pharmacies where ADMs were used. We used an optical particle counter to identify tasks that generated pharmaceutical dust. We collected 72 inhalable dust air samples in or near the employees' breathing zones. In addition to gravimetric analysis, our contract laboratory used internal methods involving liquid chromatography to analyze these samples for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and/or lactose, an inactive filler in tablets. We had to choose samples for these additional analyses because many methods used different extraction solvents. We selected 57 samples for analysis of lactose. We used real-time particle monitoring results, observations, and information from employees on the dustiness of pharmaceuticals to select 28 samples (including 13 samples that were analyzed for lactose) for analysis of specific APIs. Pharmaceutical dust was generated during a variety of tasks like emptying and refilling of ADM canisters. Using compressed air to clean canisters and manual count machines produced the overall highest peak number concentrations (19,000-580,000 particles/L) of smallest particles (count median aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2 µm). Employees who refilled, cleaned, or repaired ADM canisters, or hand filled prescriptions were exposed to higher median air concentrations of lactose (5.0-12 µg/m(3)) than employees who did other jobs (0.04-1.3 µg/m(3)), such as administrative/office work, labeling/packaging, and verifying prescriptions. We detected 10 APIs in air, including lisinopril, a drug prescribed for high blood pressure, levothyroxine, a drug prescribed for hypothyroidism, and methotrexate, a hazardous drug prescribed for cancer and other disorders. Three air concentrations of lisinopril (1.8-2.7 µg/m(3)) exceeded the lower bound of the manufacturer's hazard control band (1-10 µg/m(3)). All other API air concentrations were below applicable occupational exposure limits. Our findings indicate that some pharmacy employees are exposed to multiple APIs and that measures are needed to control those exposures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Poultry are well recognized as possible carriers of Salmonella species. As part of the local foods movement, backyard poultry flocks have increased in popularity in recent years. Between 1996 and 2012, 45 outbreaks of human Salmonella infections linked to live poultry from mail-order hatcheries were documented. This review examines the history of live poultry-associated salmonellosis in humans in the United States, the current status of the issue, and what can be done to help prevent these illnesses. An integrated One Health approach involving the mail-order hatchery industry, feed stores, healthcare providers, veterinarians, and backyard flock owners is needed to help prevent live poultry-associated salmonellosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In August 1987, a letter, informational pamphlet and order coupon for free mail-order condoms were sent to an experimental group of teenage males 16-17 years of age. An experimental design was used to measure the impact of the mailing on teenagers' knowledge, attitudes and behavior. Approximately five weeks after the mailing, 985 members of this group and 1,033 members of the control group (who received no mailing) were interviewed by telephone. About seven months after the mailing, members of the experimental group who claimed they had ordered the free condoms were reinterviewed by phone. The results of the initial interviews revealed that about three-fourths of the teenagers in the experimental group had received the materials, and about two-thirds had read them. Moreover, males in the experimental group, particularly those who reported having received and read the pamphlet, were slightly but statistically significantly more knowledgeable about sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), pregnancy and contraceptives. On the other hand, there were no differences between males in the experimental and control groups in attitudes toward STDs or birth control, nor were there differences in actual sexual activity or in the use of birth control. However, the experimental group was significantly more likely to have ordered condoms by mail, presumably as a result of having received the free mail-order condom offer. Many of those who ordered condoms had previously had sex and had used condoms. However, a sizeable portion of those who ordered condoms did so prior to first intercourse, suggesting a possibly important early intervention.

PIP: In August 1987, a letter, informational pamphlet and order coupon for free mail-order condoms were sent to an experimental group of teenage males ages 16-17. An experimental design was used to measure the impact of the mailing on teens' knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Approximately 5 weeks after the mailing, 985 members of this group and 1033 members of the control group (who received no mailing) were interviewed by telephone. About 7 months after the mailing, members of the experimental group who claimed they had ordered the free condoms were reinterviewed by phone. The results of the initial interviews revealed that about 3/4 of the teens in the experimental group had received the materials, and about 2/3 had read them. Moreover, males in the experimental group, particularly those who reported having received and read the pamphlet, were slightly but statistically significantly more knowledgeable about sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), pregnancy, and contraceptives. On the other hand, there were no differences between males in the experimental and control groups in attitudes towards STDs or birth control, nor were there differences in actual sexual activity or in the use of birth control. However, the experimental group was significantly more likely to have ordered condoms by mail, presumably as a result of having received the free mail-order condom offer. Many of those who ordered condoms had previously had sex and had used condoms. However, a sizeable portion of those who ordered condoms did so prior to 1st intercourse, suggesting a possibly important early intervention.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PIP: In 1975 in Seattle, Washington, a nonprescription contraceptive specialty shop known as the Rubber Tree opened as a nonprofit project of the Seattle Chapter of Zero Population Growth. A visit to the shop confirms the logic of the concept that unhealthy attitudes toward contraceptives, particularly condoms, are reinforced when the products are not sold openly. The shop's clientele - the only shop of its kind in the U.S. - has steadily grown over 3 years; an estimated 7000 person were served last year. Inside the shop, situated on a quiet residential street, there are brightly packaged contraceptives attractively arranged on shelves as well as colorful posters, T-shirts, and bumper stickers bearing population control messages, and a variety of books dealing with human sexuality and family planning. In addition to making nonprescription contraceptives easily available and working to abolish social taboos, the Rubber Tree's mission includes the dissemination of medically accurate information in the hope of reducing the incidence of venereal disease and unplanned pregnancies. The shop also has a mail-order service to help increase the availability of contraceptives and family planning information in small towns and rural areas.^ieng

Asunto(s)