RESUMEN
The goal of our study was to clarify the effect of low pulse rate fluoroscopy applying in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on devices' visibility and radiation dose. Four types of fluoroscopy conditions combined with two pulse rates (7.5 and 15 pulses/s) and two types of adaptive temporal filters (ATFs) (weak and strong) were used. Samples for visibility evaluation were acquired with moving phantom and devices such as stent, balloon, and guidewire. Trailing artifacts and the visibility of stent were evaluated by Scheffe's method of paired comparisons. Incident air kerma (Ka,r) and kerma area product (PKA) in the clinic were obtained under two fluoroscopic pulse rate conditions (7.5 and 15 pulses/s). As a result, in 7.5 pulses/s fluoroscopy, trailing artifacts were decreased by using weak ATF with the median value of PKA and Ka,r reduced by about 50%, but stent visibility was decreased compared to 15 pulses/s. Therefore, a combination of 7.5 pulses/s fluoroscopy and suitable ATF can bring dose reduction with avoiding trailing artifacts, but dose per pulse should be adjusted to maintain the stent visibility.
Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Dosis de Radiación , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Stents , ArtefactosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) often requires a long fluoroscopic time and protection from scatter radiation. This study reports on scatter radiation levels during CRT, with and without additional shielding, and using standard or low pulse rate fluoroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Additional lead-shielding drape (0.35-mm lead equivalent) was used on the left side of the table and pulsed fluoroscopy was performed at rates of 10 pulses/s (usual rate) and 7.5 pulses/s (low pulse rate). Fluoroscopy scatter radiation was measured for both pulse rates using an acrylic phantom with a radiation survey meter, both with and without the additional lead-shielding drape. RESULTS: With the additional lead-shielding drape, the fluoroscopy scatter radiation was reduced by 74.3% at 10 pulses/s and 78.6% at 7.5 pulses/s. If the fluoroscopy was changed from 10 pulses/s to 7.5 pulses/s, the scattered radiation at the primary physician's position was reduced by 24.0%. The combined use of additional shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy reduced scatter radiation by over 80%. CONCLUSION: Additional lead-shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy are effective in reducing the scattered radiation dose to physicians and nurses during CRT.