RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the impact of the loco-regional treatment modality, on the loco-regional recurrence (LRR) rates and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients younger than 40 years. METHODS: Data of 623 breast cancer patients younger than 40 years of age were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified according to the locoregional treatment approach into three groups: the mastectomy group (M), the mastectomy followed by radiation therapy group (MRX) and the breast conservative therapy group (BCT). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 72 months (range, 6-180). Two hundred and nine patients were treated with BCT, 86 with MRM and 328 with MRX. The 10-year rate LRR rates according to treatment modality were: 13.4% for BCT, 15.1% for MRM and 8.5% for MRX (p 0.106). On univariate analysis, T stage (p 0.009), AJCC stage (p 0.047) and Her 2 status (p 0.001) were associated with LRR. Ten-year overall survival (OS) was 72.7% (78.5% in the BCT group, 69.8% in the MRM group and 69.8% in the MRX group, p 0.072). On Univariate analysis, age < 35 (p 0.032), grade III (p 0.001), N3 stage (p 0.001), AJCC stage III (p 0.005), ER negative status (0.04), Her 2-status positive (0.006) and lack of chemotherapy administration (p 0.02) were all predictors of increased mortality. CONCLUSION: For patients younger than 40 years of age, similar LRR and overall survival outcomes were achieved using BCT, M or MRX. Young age at diagnosis should not be used alone in recommending one loco-regional treatment approach over the others.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mastectomía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Adulto , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Terapia Combinada , Factores de Edad , Adulto Joven , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is no clear consensus on the relative ranking of interventional and radiation techniques with indications similar to those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We used a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of non-surgical treatments for early HCC. METHODS: We searched databases for randomized trials assessing the efficacy of loco-regional treatments for HCCs ≤5 cm with no extrahepatic spread or portal invasion. The primary outcome was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included overall and local progression-free survival (PFS). A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed, and the relative ranking of therapies was assessed with P-scores. RESULTS: Nineteen studies comparing 11 different strategies in 2,793 patients were included. Chemoembolization plus RFA improved OS better than RFA alone (HR 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.82; P-score=0.951). Cryoablation, microwave ablation, laser ablation, and proton beam therapy had similar effects on OS compared with RFA. For overall PFS, but not local PFS, only chemoembolization plus RFA performed significantly better than RFA (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.88; P-score=0.964). Injection of percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid was significantly less effective than RFA for all measured outcomes, while no differences in progression outcomes were identified for other therapies included in the network. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that chemoembolization combined with RFA is the best option for local treatment of early HCC. Cases with potential contraindications for RFA may benefit from a tailored approach using thermal or radiation modalities.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Ablación por Catéter , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Metaanálisis en Red , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Pancreatic cancer is currently the seventh leading cause of cancer death (4.5% of all cancer deaths) while 80%-90% of the patients suffer from unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis. Prognosis remains poor, with a mean survival up to 15 mo following systemic chemotherapy. Loco-regional thermal ablative techniques are rarely implemented due to the increased risk of thermal injury to the adjacent structures, which can lead to severe adverse events. Irreversible electroporation, a promising novel non-thermal ablative modality, has been recently introduced in clinical practice for the management of inoperable pancreatic cancer as a safer and more effective loco-regional treatment option. Experimental and initial clinical data are optimistic. This review will focus on the basic principles of IRE technology, currently available data, and future directions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pronóstico , Electroporación/métodos , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Loco-regional therapy (LRT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been investigated in several clinical trials, with heterogeneous and conflicting results. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of de novo MBC patients treated with front-line chemotherapy (FLC) followed by LRT of the primary tumor. Our aims were to evaluate the characteristics, treatment, and oncological outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), and overall survival (OS) of de novo MBC. We also investigated possible subgroups of patients with better outcomes according to menopausal status, biological sub-type, location, number of metastases, and radiologic complete response after FLC. RESULTS: We included 61 patients in the study. After a median follow-up of 55 months, disease progression occurred in 60.7% of patients and 49.2% died. There were no significant differences in PFS, DPFS, and OS between different subgroups of de novo MBC patients. A trend toward better PFS and DPFS was observed in triple-positive tumors, without a statistically significant difference in OS. CONCLUSIONS: No specific subgroup of de novo MBC patients showed a statistically significant survival advantage after FLC followed by LRT of the primary tumor.
RESUMEN
Background: Loco-regional treatment strategies of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases are evolving, but biological markers that can benefit patients and assist physicians in clinical decisions are lacking. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the current knowledge on circulating DNA and its clinical utility in predicting outcomes in patients undergoing loco-regional treatment of CRC metastases. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted on March 22, 2022. We included studies on patients undergoing loco-regional treatment of CRC metastases reporting the predictive or prognostic value of circulating DNA in the blood. Hazard ratios (HR) were pooled in separate random-effects meta-analyses to investigate if pre- or post-ablation measurements of circulating DNA were associated with survival. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Results: Twenty-eight studies with 2868 patients were included, of which 16 studies were eligible for meta-analyses. As expected in this new research field, a majority of included studies (n = 21/28) had a high risk of bias in at least one domain. Circulating DNA above the cutoff in a plasma sample taken before loco-regional treatment was associated with a short recurrence-free survival [pooled HR = 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-5.7, n = 162] and overall survival (pooled HR = 4.7, 95% CI 1.1-20.6, n = 105). Circulating DNA above the cutoff in a plasma sample taken after loco-regional treatment was associated with a short recurrence-free survival (pooled HR = 4.5, 95% CI 3.4-6.1, n = 569) and overall survival (pooled HR = 7.5, 95% CI 2.0-27.3, n = 161). There was limited data on the association between dynamics in circulating DNA and outcome. Conclusions: Measurements of circulating DNA can be valuable when selecting and monitoring patients undergoing loco-regional treatment of CRC metastases. Studies designed to investigate the true clinical utility of circulating DNA in the context of various ablation modalities are warranted.The review has been registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022320032).
RESUMEN
Patients with thyroid cancer (TC) usually have an excellent prognosis; however, 5-10% of them develop an advanced disease. The prognosis of this subgroup is still favourable if the lesions respond to radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment. Nearly two-thirds of advanced TC patients become RAI-refractory (RAI-R), and their management is challenging. A multidisciplinary approach in the context of a tumour board is essential to define a personalized strategy. Systemic therapy is not always the best option. In case of slow neoplastic growth and low tumour burden, active surveillance may represent a valuable choice. Local approaches might be considered if the disease progression is limited to a single or few lesions, also in combination and during systemic therapy. Antiresorptive treatment may be started in presence of bone metastases. In case of rapid and/or symptomatic progression involving multiple lesions and/or organs, systemic therapy has to be considered, in absence of contraindications. The multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs) lenvatinib and sorafenib are currently available as first-line treatment for advanced progressive RAI-R TC. Among second-line options, cabozantinib has been recently approved in RAI-R TC who progressed during MKIs targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). In the last few years, next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays have been increasingly employed, permitting identification of the genetic alterations harboured by TC, with a significant impact on patients' management. Novel selective targeted therapies have been introduced for the treatment of RAI-R TC in selected cases: REarranged during Transfection (RET) inhibitors (selpercatinib and pralsetinib) and Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase (TRK) inhibitors (larotrectinib and entrectinib) have recently expanded the panorama of the therapeutic options. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising results, and they are still under investigation.
RESUMEN
Patients affected by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have very poor prognosis, whereby at a follow-up of 5 years, the mortality rate is very similar to the incidence rate. Globally, around 10% of patients are amenable to radical surgery at the time of diagnosis, which represents the only chance of cure or long-term survival for these patients. Almost 40% of patients with PDAC show locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). LAPC is not a metastatic disease, although it is not amenable to radical surgery. For these patients, systemic induction chemotherapy with intravenous FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, folic acid, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) regimen is administered, with the aim of conversion to surgery, although the conversion rate remains low, at approximately 10% to 15%. Pancreatic arterial chemotherapy has been explored to overcome the intrinsic tumor pancreatic resistance to systemic chemotherapy, where an intra-arterial port-a-cath is placed by means of interventional oncology techniques under angiographic guidance in the operating theater. Here, we treated a patient with an intra-arterially modified FOLFIRINOX regimen. Three courses were administered, and the patient experienced no adverse events. At the end of the third course, the patient rapidly developed lung failure due to nosocomial Legionella pneumophila infection, despite the impressive pathological tumor response shown in the autopsy report. This is a first and unique report that demonstrates that pancreatic intra-arterial FOLFIRINOX can be safe and efficacious. We believe that this preliminary result will be confirmed in the next patients to be enrolled and that it provides a glimmer of hope for patients with this lethal disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant sorafenib may further enhance the efficacy of transarterial radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radioembolization plus sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. METHODS: With a literature search through October 2020, we identified 9 studies (632 patients). Primary outcome was overall survival. Results were expressed as pooled median, odds ratio, or hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Pooled overall survival after radioembolization plus sorafenib was 10.79 months (95% confidence interval 9.19-12.39) and it was longer in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B (14.47 months, 9.07-19.86) as compared to BCLC C patients (10.22 months, 7.53-12.9). No difference between combined therapy versus radioembolization alone was observed in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio 1.07, 0.89-1.30). Pooled median progression-free survival was 6.32 months (5.68-6.98), with 1-year progression-free survival pooled rate of 38.5% (12.7%-44.2%). No difference in progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.94, 0.79-1.12) between the two treatments was observed. Pooled rate of severe adverse events was 48.9% (26.7%-71.2%), again with no difference between the two treatment regimens (odds ratio 1.52, 0.15-15.02). CONCLUSIONS: The association of sorafenib does not seem to prolong survival nor delay disease progression in patients treated with radioembolization.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Terapia Combinada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Liver metastases (LMs) from thyroid cancer (TC) are relatively uncommon in clinical practice and their management is challenging. Interventional radiology loco-regional treatments (LRTs), including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), have been successfully employed to treat LMs from various types of cancer. METHODS: We analyzed the role of LRTs in the management of unresectable LMs from differentiated and medullary TCs performed at our institution from 2015 to 2020. A review of the available English literature regarding this topic was also performed. RESULTS: Six hepatic LRTs were performed in 4 TC patients with LMs, in 2 cases after the start of treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). A partial response was obtained in 2 patients; the diameter of the largest targeted lesion was 18 mm in both of them. The remaining procedures were performed on larger lesions and a stable disease was achieved in all but one case. Acute LRT-related complications were transient and mild. In literature, the largest studies were focused on TACE in LMs from MTC, showing good tolerance and remarkable disease control, especially in case of limited liver tumour involvement. CONCLUSION: LRTs for LMs represent a valuable option for the treatment of metastatic TC in case of isolated hepatic progression or for symptoms relief, also after the start of TKI treatment as part of a multimodal approach. The best disease control is obtained when hepatic metastatic burden is limited. These procedures are generally well tolerated; however, a cautious multidisciplinary selection of the candidates is mandatory.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/métodos , Radioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), macrovascular invasion (MaVI) limits treatment options and decreases survival. Detailed data on the relationship between MaVI extension and patients' characteristics, and its impact on patients' outcome are limited. We evaluated the prevalence and extension of MaVI in a large cohort of consecutive HCC patients, analysing its association with liver disease and tumour characteristics, as well as with treatments performed and patients' survival. METHODS: We analysed data of 4774 patients diagnosed with HCC recorded in the Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) database (2008-2018). Recursive partition analysis (RPA) was performed to evaluate interactions between MaVI, clinical variables and treatment, exploring the inter-relationship determining overall survival. RESULTS: MaVI prevalence was 11.1%, and median survival of these patients was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1-7.1). MaVI was associated with younger age at diagnosis, presence of symptoms, worse Performance Status (PS) and liver function, high alphafetoprotein levels and large HCCs. MaVI extension was associated with worse PS, ascites and greater impairment in liver function. RPA identified patients' categories with different treatment indications and survival, ranging from 2.4 months in those with PS > 1 and ascites, regardless of MaVI extension (receiving best supportive care in 90.3% of cases), to 14.1 months in patients with PS 0-1, no ascites and Vp1-Vp2 MaVI (treated with surgery in 19.1% of cases). CONCLUSIONS: MaVI presence and extension, together with PS and ascites, significantly affect patients' survival and treatment selection. The decision tree based on these parameters may help assess patients' prognosis and inform therapeutic decisions.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Venas Mesentéricas/patología , Vena Porta/patología , Técnicas de Ablación , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ascitis , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Hepatitis B Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Humanos , Italia , Hepatopatías Alcohólicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Trasplante de Hígado , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/complicaciones , Gravedad del Paciente , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the first cause of death among gynecological malignancies with a high incidence of recurrence. Different treatment options are suitable to prolong the survival rate of these patients. Over the last years, one of the most intriguing methods, adopted in different oncologic centers worldwide, is the hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed to value the role of HIPEC for ovarian cancer recurrence. Search strategy was conducted with a combination of the following keywords: "ovarian recurrence, ovarian cancer recurrence, peritoneal cancer recurrence, ovarian recurrence AND HIPEC, secondary cytoreduction HIPEC". Seven studies were selected for analysis. RESULTS: In women with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), the use of HIPEC in addition to cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy significantly improved 1-year overall survival (OS) when compared to protocols without HIPEC (OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.06-5.56; P=0.04; I2=4%). The improvement in OS was maintained significant also after 2, 3 and 5 years respectively (OR 3.33; 95% CI, 1.81-6.10; P<0.01; I2=0%), (OR 4.22; 95% CI, 2.07-8.60; P<0.01; I2=52%), (OR 5.17; 95% CI, 1.40-19.09; P=0.01; I2=82%). CONCLUSIONS: HIPEC seems to have an effective role to prolong survival in patients affected by ROC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant sorafenib may enhance the efficacy of transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of radioembolization plus sorafenib in comparison to radioembolization alone. METHODS: Out of 175 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with radioembolization between 2011 and 2018, after propensity score matching, two groups were compared: a group of 45 patients that underwent radioembolization while being on sorafenib (Group 1) and a second group of 90 patients that underwent radioembolization alone (Group 2). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced concerning liver function and tumor burden. No significant differences in survival outcomes were identified (median overall survival 10 vs. 10 months; p = 0.711), median progression-free survival 6 vs. 7 months (p = 0.992) in Group 1 and Group 2). The objective response rate in Group 1 vs. Group 2 was 45.5% vs. 42.8% (p = 1) according to mRECIST. No differences in toxicity nor in liver decompensation rates were registered. CONCLUSIONS: The association of sorafenib does not prolong survival nor delay progression in patients treated with radioembolization. Liver toxicity does not differ among the two therapeutic schemes.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pain management in the total knee replacement (TKR) represent a fundamental step for a positive outcome, allowing rapid mobilization, already on the first day. Further, continuous peripheral nerve block techniques have been reported to allow effective and safe control of acute postoperative pain, ensuring the implementation and completion of an accurate and intensive joint rehabilitation program. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess early mobility and compliance of patients that underwent TKR surgery using the femoral block. METHODS: For the study, all patients that underwent TKR from 2015 to 2018 with ASA score between II-III was evaluated. Patients underwent vital parameters monitoring and were treated initially with midazolam (0.05mg / kg) e.v. combined sciatic block + femoral perineural catheter positioning using a peripheral nerve stimulation-assisted technique. RESULTS: Intraoperatively, satisfactory analgesia was guaranteed in all patients, associated with a complete muscle relaxation of the affected limb. High patient compliance, associated with good control of acute postoperative pain was obtained in the first 24 hours after surgery (VAS 0- 1). The ROM outcomes were good in all rehabilitation stages, managing to reach 90 degrees bending on the seventh day with an average KSS score of 88-90. Patient satisfaction and impact on quality of life were assessed with the SF-36 showing average scores of 78. CONCLUSION: Continuous femoral nerve blocking ensures good postoperative analgesia in TKR allowing an early joint mobilization, a rapid functional recovery of the knee and increasing patient compliance during the post-operative rehabilitation program.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/rehabilitación , Cateterismo/métodos , Ambulación Precoz/métodos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Isolated limb infusion (ILI) with cytotoxic agents is a simple and effective treatment option for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases (ITMs) confined to an extremity. Data for ILIs performed in Europe are sparse and to date no Eastern European ILI experience has been reported. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of ILI in Estonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for twenty-one patients were collected and analysed. All patients had melanoma ITMs and underwent an ILI between January 2012 and May 2018. The cytotoxic drug combination of melphalan and actinomycin-D was used. Drug circulation times were 20-30â¯min under mildly hyperthermic conditions (38-39⯰C). Primary outcome measures were treatment response and overall survival. RESULTS: Nineteen lower limb and two upper limb ILIs were performed. The female to male ratio was 18:3. The overall response rate (complete + partial response) was 76% (n = 16), with a complete response in 38% (n = 8). The overall long-term limb salvage rate was 90% (n = 19). During follow-up, eight patients (38%) died, two due to metastatic melanoma. Five-year overall survival was 57%. CONCLUSION: This first Eastern European report of ILI for melanoma ITMs shows results comparable to those from other parts of the world. In this era of effective targeted and immune therapies, ILI remains a useful treatment option, with a high overall response rate and durable responses in patients with melanoma ITMs confined to a limb.
Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/secundario , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Extremidades , Femenino , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cabozantinib showed efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In this study we aimed to describe the safety and to collect evidence on the potential efficacy of cabozantinib in mRCC patients with brain metastases (BM) in a real-world experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of patients treated with cabozantinib within the Italian Managed Access Program. Patients were selected for the presence of BM before the start of treatment and for at least 1 previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment regimen for metastatic disease. Safety data were reported, and overall response rate (ORR), brain-specific response, progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 12 patients treated with cabozantinib were evaluated. Any grade adverse events (AEs) accounted for 92%, Grade 3/4 AEs rated at 36% with no major neurological side effects. The most common AEs included hypertension (33%), fatigue (24%), aminotransferase elevation (25%), hypothyroidism (16%), and gastrointestinal toxicity (16%). The ORR was 50% with a disease control rate of 75%. All 5 patients treated with a combined systemic and brain-directed approach obtained intracranial disease control, without increased toxicity. Median PFS and median OS were 5.8 and 8.8 months, respectively. Comparable safety and tolerability results for other TKI regimens were reported from the literature. CONCLUSION: Cabozantinib showed safety, acceptable tolerability, and promising antitumor activity in a population of mRCC patients with BM from a real-world experience. A combined modality approach for renal cell carcinoma with BM, whenever feasible, could be recommended to improve oncological outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anilidas/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Secondary and tertiary cytoreductive surgery was associated with improved overall survival in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Hyperthermic intraoperative intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is considered an attractive method in the treatment of ROC to deliver chemotherapy with enhanced effect directly at the tumor site. However, another deserving aspect is the feasibility and the oncologic role of HIPEC repetition. Twelve patients affected by secondary ovarian cancer recurrence previously submitted to cytoreduction followed by HIPEC were enrolled for the present study to receive tertiary cytoreduction followed by HIPEC repetition. The median operative time, including time for HIPEC procedure, was 360 min (range 240-540). Average EBL was 325 ml (from 100 to 500 ml). The median hospital stay was of 5 days, from 4 to 10. Low-grade post operatory complications occurred in 2 patients (16.6%) and high-grade complication in 1 case (8.3%). Our study report encouraging data about safety of HIPEC repetition in ovarian cancer treatment.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Tempo Operativo , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Seguridad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients, the standard of care is primary debulking surgery, followed by first-line chemotherapy often with bevacizumab addiction. In this context, some experiences have shown that a comprehensive treatment approach to surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) could improve the prognosis. OBJECTIVE: This is a study aimed to explore the feasibility of primary debulking surgery and HIPEC upfront followed by first-line therapy with bevacizumab. STUDY DESIGN: Phase II monocentric, open label, non-randomised and single-arm study. Forty patients affected by advanced ovarian cancer submitted to primary debulking surgery with HIPEC were enrolled in the study. After surgery, all patients underwent systemic chemotherapy with bevacizumab addiction. RESULTS: Complete cytoreduction (RT = 0) was achieved in all cases. Treatment-related early complications were observed in 23 patients and in 15 cases were G1-G2. Major complications were reported in 8 patients. No postoperative death was recorded. Subsequent chemotherapy was administered in all cases. Median time between surgery and first cycle of chemotherapy was 42 days (range 30-76). Concomitant bevacizumab was administered in 34 patients (85%). Maintenance with bevacizumab was feasible in 33 patients (82.5%) and its withdrawal was necessary for 1 patient (2.5%) due to G3 hypertension. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that HIPEC can be safely introduced in the upfront therapy of advanced ovarian cancer.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/farmacología , Bevacizumab/farmacología , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to enable liver transplantation has become an area of intense interest and research. It may allow a curative option in patients outside widely accepted transplantation criteria, with outcomes that, in some studies, are comparable to transplantation for patients within criteria. There have been conflicting opinions on the best downstaging protocols, criteria for downstaging eligibility and for assessment of response. We therefore aimed to review the literature and evidence for downstaging, as well as considering its drawbacks. CONCLUSION: Pooled analyses have suggested success in down staging in about half of patients treated, but with higher recurrence rates than patients initially within transplantation criteria. Studies with strict inclusion criteria and mandatory waiting time before transplantation reported survival equivalent to patients who did not require downstaging. In carefully selected patients, there is a role for down staging to provide the chance of transplantation and cure, with acceptable outcomes. Further multi center, well-designed studies are required to clarify who will mostly benefit. Until such data is available, downstaging criteria should be stated within transplantation programs and relevant decisions should be discussed by multidisciplinary teams.
RESUMEN
Systemic therapy is usually the main treatment for patients with stageⅣbreast cancer at diagnosis. Surgical resection of the primary tumor is typically conducted for palliative reasons, and whether such treatment can benefit patients' survival outcome re-mains unclear. In our clinical practice, proper timing and indications for surgery of the primary tumor, as well as an appropriate surgi-cal technique, may increase the success of local treatment for stageⅣbreast cancer. This article reviews available literature and dis-cusses the role of surgical resection in the treatment of stageⅣbreast cancer at initial presentation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the time to re-operation, following inadequate loco-regional surgery for breast cancer, between the public and private sectors of the Sunshine Coast region. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the medical records of all female patients undergoing guide wire-localized, breast-conserving surgery at Nambour General Hospital and in the local private sector from January 2009 until April 2010. The dates of initial consultation, operation, post-operative consultation and any subsequent reoperation were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen public sector patients and 113 private sector patients were identified during the study period. Thirty-seven public patients (32%) and 46 private patients (41%) required re-operation. This difference was not significant (χ(2) = 2.06, degrees of freedom (df) = 1, P = 0.15). The mean time and standard error from the initial consultation to the first operation and re-operation in the public sector was 26 (2.3) and 62 (3.8) days, and in the private sector was 12 (1.2) and 30 (4.4) days, respectively P < 0.001. On average, 70% of public patients and 96% of private patients completed the surgical component of their breast cancer management within the Queensland Health-recommended time frame of 30 days (χ(2) = 26, df = 1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While experiencing similar rates of re-operative surgery in breast cancer management in the public and private sectors, the private sector deals with this issue in a more time efficient manner. An opportunity for intervention by quarantining theatre time is explored to improve the public sector time management.