RESUMEN

Patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and favorable survival prognoses may benefit from radiation doses exceeding 10 × 3.0 Gy. In a multi-center phase 2 trial, patients receiving 15 × 2.633 Gy (41.6 Gy10) or 18 × 2.333 Gy (43.2 Gy10) were evaluated for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor/sensory functions, ambulatory status, pain, distress, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). They were compared (propensity score-adjusted Cox regression) to a historical control group (n = 266) receiving 10 × 3.0 Gy (32.5 Gy10). In the phase 2 cohort, 50 (of 62 planned) patients were evaluated for LPFS. Twelve-month rates of LPFS and OS were 96.8% and 69.9%, respectively. Motor and sensory functions improved in 56% and 57.1% of patients, and 94.0% were ambulatory following radiotherapy. Pain and distress decreased in 84.4% and 78.0% of patients. Ten and two patients experienced grade 2 and 3 toxicities, respectively. Phase 2 patients showed significantly better LPFS than the control group (p = 0.039) and a trend for improved motor function (p = 0.057). Ambulatory and OS rates were not significantly different. Radiotherapy with 15 × 2.633 Gy or 18 × 2.333 Gy was well tolerated and appeared superior to 10 × 3.0 Gy.

RESUMEN

Background: Microwave ablation (MWA) and intratumoral chemotherapy (ITC) are useful for treating tumors in animal models; however, their clinical use in patients with large non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate preliminary outcomes of MWA + ITC for large NSCLC. Methods: From November 2015 to April 2020, a total of 44 NSCLC patients with a mean lesion diameter of 6.1 ± 1.5 cm were enrolled and underwent synchronous MWA + ITC procedures. The primary endpoint was local progression-free survival (LPFS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), complications, overall survival (OS), and associated prognostic factors. Results: The median follow-up time was 19.0 months. At the 1-month CT scan, complete tumor ablation was observed in 47.7% of cases. Median LPFS was 12.1 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year LPFS rates were 51.2%, 27.9%, and 13.6%, respectively. A shorter LPFS was significantly associated with large lesions (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.49; p = 0.032). Median PFS was 8.1 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 29.5%, 18.2%, and 9.1%, respectively. LPFS was significantly superior to PFS (p = 0.046). Median OS was 18.8 months. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 65.9%, 43.2%, 26.4%, and 10.0%, respectively. In univariate comparisons, high performance status (PS) score, smoking, and larger lesions were significantly correlated with poor survival. In multivariate analysis, advanced age, higher PS score, higher stage, larger lesion, and prior systematic treatment were independent prognostic factors for shorter OS. Adverse events were well tolerated and all patients recovered after appropriate intervention. Conclusions: MWA + ITC is a safe and effective new modality of local treatment for large NSCLC and can significantly prolong LPFS.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection (SR) and thermal ablation for the treatment of adrenal metastases. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2018, 133 patients with adrenal metastases who underwent SR (n = 76) or thermal ablation (n = 57) were enrolled. The mean tumor size was 58.00 ± 10.65 mm (22-80 mm) in the SR group and 58.03 ± 12.76 mm (34-89 mm) in the thermal ablation group. Local progression-free survival (LPFS) and safety were compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic factors of LPFS. Complications, hospitalization days, and blood loss were also assessed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 29.0 months (range, 20.4-37.6 months). No treatment-related mortality was observed. The 1-, 3- and 5-year LPFS rates were 74.0%, 62.8%, and 31.4% in the SR group and 72.8%, 68.7%, and 51.5% in the ablation group, with the median LPFS of 41.5 months (95% CI: 9.3-23.4 months) vs. 47.9 months (95% CI 20.6-75.8 months), respectively (p = 0.784). Tumor size ≥3 cm was the only significant risk factor for LPFS (p = 0.031). The ablation group was superior to the SR group with a lower major complication rate (4.1% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.03), less blood loss (1 ml vs. 100 ml, p < 0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (2 d vs. 6 d, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thermal ablation provided a similar LPFS and less comorbidities than SR, indicating that it is an effective and safe treatment for adrenal metastases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In a palliative situation like metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), overall treatment time of radiotherapy should be as short as possible. This study compared 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week to 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks in a prospective cohort. METHODS: Forty patients receiving 5 × 5 Gy in a phase II trial were matched 1:2 to 213 patients receiving 10 × 3 Gy in two previous prospective studies for tumor type, ambulatory status, time developing motor deficits, interval between tumor diagnosis and MSCC and visceral metastases. These factors were consistent in all three patients (triple) used for each 1:2 matching. Groups were compared for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor function, ambulatory status, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After matching, 32 triples remained for analyses (N = 96 in total). Six-month LPFS-rates were 94% after 5 × 5 Gy and 87% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.36), 6-month OS-rates 43% and 35% (p = 0.74). Improvement of motor function was achieved in 59% and 34% of patients (p = 0.028); overall response rates (improvement or no further progression of motor deficits) were 94% and 89% (p = 0.71). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 81% after 5 × 5 Gy and 85% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.61). Of non-ambulatory patients, 50% (6/12) and 46% (11/24) regained the ability to walk (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week appeared similarly effective as 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks. These results may not be applicable to long-term survivors and should be confirmed in a randomized trial directly comparing 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03070431. Registered 27 February 2017.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) has recently been applied to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, there is no randomized controlled trial-based evidence on its safety and efficacy. We compared the outcomes of PBT and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with recurrent/residual HCC (rHCC) in a phase III non-inferiority trial. METHODS: Patients with rHCC (size <3 cm, number ≤2) were randomly assigned to receive PBT or RFA according to Child-Pugh score and tumor stage. After randomization, if the assigned treatment was technically infeasible, crossover was allowed. The primary endpoint was 2-year local progression-free survival (LPFS), with a non-inferiority margin of 15% in the per-protocol (PP) population; a complementary analysis was performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (NCT01963429). RESULTS: The ITT population comprised 144 patients receiving either PBT (n = 72) or RFA (n = 72). Six patients switched from the PBT arm to the RFA arm and 19 patients switched from the RFA arm to the PBT arm. In the PP population, the 2-year LPFS rate with PBT (n = 80) vs. RFA (n = 56) was 94.8% vs. 83.9%, a difference of 10.9 percentage points (90% CI 1.8-20.0; p <0.001); in the ITT population, the 2-year LPFS rate with PBT vs. RFA was 92.8% vs. 83.2%, a difference of 9.6 percentage points (90% CI 0.7-18.4; p <0.001), meeting the criteria for non-inferiority. The 3- and 4-year LPFS rates for PBT were also non-inferior to those for RFA. The most common adverse events were radiation pneumonitis (32.5%) and decreased leukocyte counts (23.8%) for PBT and increased alanine aminotransferase levels (96.4%) and abdominal pain (30.4%) for RFA. No Grade 4 adverse events or mortality were noted. CONCLUSIONS: PBT showed LPFS values that were non-inferior to those for RFA; in addition, PBT was tolerable and safe. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: #NCT01963429 (ClinicalTrials.gov). LAY SUMMARY: Radiofrequency ablation is the standard of care for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma in whom surgery is not feasible. This study is the first phase III randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical outcomes of proton beam radiotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation in patients with recurrent small HCC. Our findings show that this new technique is not inferior and can be applied safely in patients with small recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: To characterize the population treated with SBRT for early-stage primary lung tumors in our institution, determine their outcomes, and identify potential prognosis factors. BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) is an alternative treatment for inoperable patients with early-stage lung cancer. It confers a local control rate around 90% at 3 years, and 2-3 year overall survival rates of 43-60% in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients treated in our department between 2012 and 2017 and evaluated local progression-free survival (L-PFS), nodal or distant progression-free survival (ND-PFS), global progression-free survival (G-PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease specific survival (DSS). Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) models were built to assess the influence of each variable. RESULTS: We identified 218 patients with 233 tumors. Most were male (78.9%) with a median age of 73 years. Median follow-up was 22 months. At 18 months, L-PFS was 93.7%, ND-PFS was 82.2%, G-PFS was 76.0%, DSS was 90.5%, and OS was 78.0% in ≤ T2 tumors. On UVA, T2 tumors were associated with lower L-PFS, G-PFS and DSS than T1, with no significant impact on ND-PFS or OS, an effect that persisted on MVA. On UVA, L-PFS and G-PFS were negatively influenced by female gender and a 5-fraction schedule was associated with worse G-PFS, which was not confirmed on MVA. CONCLUSION: Our local and distant control rates and survival were similar to those previously reported. On MVA, T2 tumors displayed lower L-PFS, G-PFS and DSS, with no difference in OS.

RESUMEN

Background: Proton beam has an excellent depth dose distribution due to its unique physical properties, and thus proton beam therapy (PBT) has been tried and showed promising outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this phase II study is to evaluate the efficacy of hypofractionated PBT in HCC. Methods: The eligibility criteria for this study were as follows: patients with HCC lesion(s) who were failed after, were difficult to treat with, or refused to other local treatments; tumor size and number of ≤7 and ≤2 cm, respectively, and HCC lesion(s) of ≥2 cm from gastrointestinal organs; Child-Pugh score of ≤7; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1; and age ≥18 years. The prescribed dose of PBT was 70 Gy equivalent in 10 fractions. The primary endpoint was 3-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) rate. Results: Forty-five patients were prospectively enrolled, and there were 35 men and 10 women with a median age of 63 years (range, 46-78 years). Thirty-seven patients had recurrent and/or residual disease, and eight patients had treatment-naive disease. All patients received the planned treatments without treatment interruption, and grade ≥3 acute toxicity did not occur. The median follow-up duration was 35.1 months (range, 11.2-56.3 months) and local progression occurred in two patients (8.7%). The 3-year rates of LPFS and overall survival (OS) were 95.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.1%-100%) and 86.4% (95% CI, 72.9-99.9%), respectively. Conclusion: Hypofractionated PBT showed promising LPFS and OS, and further studies are warranted to compare PBT with other local modalities.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) and favorable survival prognoses can benefit from radiation doses greater than 30Gy in 10 fractions in terms of improved local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS/DESIGN: This prospective study mainly investigates LPFS after precision radiotherapy (volumetric modulated arc therapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy) with 18 × 2.33Gy in 3.5 weeks. LPFS is defined as freedom from progression of motor deficits during radiotherapy and an in-field recurrence of MSCC following radiotherapy. The maximum relative dose allowed to the spinal cord is 101.5% of the prescribed dose, resulting in an equivalent dose in 2Gy-fractions (EQD2) for radiation myelopathy is 45.5Gy, which is below the tolerance dose of 50Gy according to the Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC). The EQD2 of this regimen for tumor cell kill is 43.1Gy, which is 33% higher than for 30Gy in 10 fractions (EQD2 = 32.5Gy). Primary endpoint is LPFS at 12 months after radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include the effect of 18 × 2.33Gy on motor function, ambulatory status, sensory function, sphincter dysfunction, LPFS at other follow-up times, overall survival, pain relief, relief of distress and toxicity. Follow-up visits for all endpoints will be performed directly and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after radiotherapy. A total of 65 patients are required for the prospective part of the study. These patients will be compared to a historical control group of at least 235 patients receiving conventional radiotherapy with 10x3Gy in 2 weeks. DISCUSSION: If precision radiotherapy with 18 × 2.33Gy results in significantly better LPFS than 10x3Gy of conventional radiotherapy, this regimen should be strongly considered for patients with MSCC and favorable survival prognoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04043156. Registered 30-07-2019.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Local progression-free survival (LPFS = stable or improved motor function/resolution of paraplegia during RT without in-field recurrence following RT) is important when treating metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). An instrument to estimate LPFS was created to identify patients appropriately treated with short-course RT instead of longer-course RT plus/minus decompressive surgery. METHODS: In 686 patients treated with 20 Gy in 5 fractions alone, ten characteristics were retrospectively analyzed for LPFS including age, interval between tumor diagnosis and RT of MSCC, visceral metastases, other bone metastases, primary tumor type, gender, time developing motor deficits, pre-RT gait function, number of vertebrae affected by MSCC, and performance score. Characteristics significantly (p < 0.05) associated with LPFS on multivariate analyses were incorporated in the scoring system. Six-month LPFS rates for significant characteristics were divided by 10, and corresponding points were added. RESULTS: On multivariate analyses, visceral metastases (p < 0.001), tumor type (p = 0.009), time developing motor deficits (p < 0.001) and performance score (p = 0.009) were associated with LPFS and used for the scoring system. Scores for patients ranged between 24 and 35 points. Three groups were designed: 24-28 (A), 29-31 (B) and 32-35 (C) points. Six-month LPFS rates were 46, 69 and 92%, 12-month LPFS rates 46, 63 and 83%. Median survival times were 2 months (61% died within 2 months), 4 months and ≥ 11 months (median not reached). CONCLUSIONS: Most group A patients appeared sub-optimally treated with 20 Gy in 5 fractions. Patients with survival prognoses ≤2 months may be considered for best supportive care or single-fraction RT, those with prognoses ≥3 months for longer-course RT plus/minus upfront decompressive surgery. Many group B and most group C patients achieved long-time LPFS and appeared sufficiently treated with 20 Gy in 5 fractions. However, based on previous data, long-term survivors may benefit from longer-course RT.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of computed-tomography-guided (CT-guided) percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for lung neoplasms adjacent to the pericardium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent. Between January 1, 2012 and March 31, 2016, 49 consecutive patients (32 men and 17 women; mean age 47.9 years; range 16-67 years) with 51 tumors (mean diameter 17.7 ±â€¯7.2 mm; range 4-30 mm) located within 10 mm of the pericardium underwent percutaneous CT-guided RFA. The technical success rate, local progression-free survival (LPFS), risk factors for local progression, and safety of this technique were evaluated. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 96.1% (49/51), and the LPFS was 98.0%, 93.0%, 84.0%, and 77.0% at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. A tumor size >2.0 cm (p = .045) and the primary lung tumor types (p = .013) were associated with local progression. No treatment-related deaths occurred. The incidence of major complications was 15.7%; complications included pneumothorax (5.9%, 3/51), pleural effusion (3.9%, 2/51), pneumonitis (3.9%, 2/51), and hemothorax (2.0%, 1/51). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous CT-guided RFA can be a safe and effective option for the treatment of lung malignancies adjacent to the pericardium.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Retrospective study of effectiveness, toxicity, and relapse patterns after low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) in patients with low-grade lymphomas. METHODS: 47 patients (median age 64 years) with 50 lesions were treated with LDRT (2â€¯× 2 Gy). In 60%, LDRT was the primary and curative treatment, in 40% offered as second-line therapy in recurrent disease. Histology included follicular (57%) and marginal zone lymphomas (43%). Patients were followed-up regularly clinically (skin) and with CT or MRI scans. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 21 months. 84% of the lesions were extranodal disease (32% orbit, 14% salivary glands, 30% skin, and 8% others). Most lesions were ≤5 cm (90%) with a singular affection (74%). 26% of the patients received rituximab simultaneously. Overall response rate (ORR) was 90% (all lesions), 93.3% (primary treatment), and 85% (recurrence treatment); p = 0.341. 2­year Local progression-free survival (LPFS) for all, curative, and palliative patients was 91.1%, 96.7%, and 83.8%, respectively; p = 0.522. Five relapses were detected: three infield only, and were therefore treated with LDRT or subsequent local RT of 30 Gy. Two patients showed an in- and outfield progression and were consequently treated with chemotherapy. Predictive factors for higher LPFS were tumor size ≤5 cm (p = 0.003), ≤2 previous treatments (p = 0.027), no skin involvement (p = 0.05), singular affection (p = 0.075), and simultaneous rituximab application (p = 0.148). LDRT was tolerated well, without detectable acute or long-term side effects. CONCLUSION: Primary LDRT is an effective treatment with high ORR and long-lasting remissions in a subset of patients with low-grade lymphoma, and may therefore be a curative treatment option for patients with low tumor burden. LDRT with the CD20 antibody obinutuzumab will soon be tested in a prospective multicenter trial.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE The authors present a retrospective analysis of a single-center experience with treatment of brain metastases using Gamma Knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC)-based radiosurgery and compare the results. METHODS From July 2010 to July 2012, 63 patients with brain metastases were treated with radiosurgery. Among them, 28 (with 83 lesions) were treated with a GK unit and 35 (with 47 lesions) with a LINAC. The primary outcome was local progression-free survival (LPFS), evaluated on a per-lesion basis. The secondary outcome was overall survival (OS), evaluated per patient. Statistical analysis included standard tests and Cox regression with shared-frailty models to account for the within-patient correlation. RESULTS The mean follow-up period was 11.7 months (median 7.9 months, range 1.7-32 months) for GK and 18.1 months (median 17 months, range 7.5-28.7 months) for LINAC. The median number of lesions per patient was 2.5 (range 1-9) in the GK group and 1 (range 1-3) in the LINAC group (p < 0.01, 2-sample t-test). There were more radioresistant lesions (e.g., melanoma) and more lesions located in functional areas in the GK group. Additional technical reasons for choosing GK instead of LINAC were limitations of LINAC movements, especially if lesions were located in the lower posterior fossa or multiple lesions were close to highly functional areas (e.g., the brainstem), precluding optimal dosimetry with LINAC. The median marginal dose was 24 Gy with GK and 20 Gy with LINAC (p < 0.01, 2-sample t-test). For GK, the actuarial LPFS rate at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 17 months was 96.96%, 96.96%, 96.96%, 88.1%, and 81.5%, remaining stable until 32 months. For LINAC the rate at 3, 6, 12, 17, 24, and 33 months was 91.5%, 91.5%, 91.5%, 79.9%, 55.5%, and 17.1% (log-rank p = 0.03). In the Cox regression with shared-frailty model, the risk of local progression in the LINAC group was almost twice that of the GK group (HR 1.92, p > 0.05). The mean OS was 16.0 months (95% CI 11.2-20.9 months) in the GK group, compared with 20.9 months (95% CI 16.4-25.3 months) in the LINAC group. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that a lower graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score, noncontrolled systemic status at last radiological assessment, and older age were associated with lower OS; after adjustment of these covariables by Cox regression, the OS was similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study comparing GK and LINAC-based radiosurgery for brain metastases, patients with more severe disease were treated by GK, including those harboring lesions of greater number, of radioresistant type, or in highly functional areas. The risk of local progression for the LINAC group was almost twice that in the GK group, although the difference was not statistically significant. Importantly, the OS rates were similar for the 2 groups, although GK was used in patients with more complex brain metastatic disease and with no other therapeutic alternative.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), conventional radiotherapy with 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks results in better local progression-free survival (LPFS) than 5 × 4 Gy in 1 week. Since patients with MSCC are often significantly impaired, an overall treatment time of 1 week would be preferable if resulting in similar outcomes as longer programs. This may be achieved with 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week, since the biologically effective dose is similar to 10 × 3 Gy. It can be expected that 5 × 5 Gy (like 10 × 3) Gy results in better LPFS than 5 × 4 Gy in 1 week. METHODS/DESIGN: This phase 2 study investigates LPFS after high-precision RT with 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week. LPFS is defined as freedom from both progression of motor deficits during RT and new or progressive motor deficits dur to an in-field recurrence of MSCC following RT. Considering the tolerance dose of the spinal cord, 5 × 5 Gy can be safely administered with high-precision radiotherapy such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Maximum dose to the spinal cord should not exceed 101.5% of the prescribed dose to keep the risk of radiation myelopathy below 0.03%. Primary endpoint is LPFS at 6 months following radiotherapy; secondary endpoints include motor function/ability to walk, sensory function, sphincter dysfunction, LPFS directly and 1 and 3 months following radiotherapy, overall survival, pain relief, quality of life and toxicity. Follow-up visits will be performed directly and at 1, 3 and 6 months following radiotherapy. After completion of this phase 2 study, patients will be compared to a historical control group receiving conventional radiotherapy with 5 × 4 Gy in 1 week. Forty-four patients will be included assuming 5 × 5 Gy will provide the same benefit in LPFS when compared to 5 × 4 Gy as reported for 10 × 3 Gy. DISCUSSION: If superiority regarding LPFS is shown for high-precision radiotherapy with 5 × 5 Gy when compared to conventional radiotherapy with 5 × 4 Gy, patients with MSCC would benefit from 5 × 5 Gy, since high LPFS rates could be achieved with 1 week of radiotherapy instead of 2 weeks (10 × 3 Gy). TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03070431 . Registered 27 February 2017.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to retrospectively analyze efficacy, toxicity, and relapse rates of conventional (CRT) and low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) in patients with indolent orbital lymphomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1987-2014, 45 patients (median age 64 years) with 52 lesions of indolent orbital lymphomas were treated with CRT (median dose 36 Gy, range 26-46 Gy) and 7 patients (median age 75 years) with 8 lesions were treated with LDRT (2 fractions of  2.0 Gy). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 133 months (range 2-329 months) in the CRT group and 25 months (range 10-41 months) in the LDRT group. Overall response rates were 97.7 % (CRT) and 100 % (LDRT). The 2­ and 5­year local progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 93.5 and 88.6 %, distant PFS 95.0 and 89.9 %, and overall survival 100 and 85.6 % after CRT. In the LDRT group, 2­year local PFS and overall survival remained 100 %, respectively, and distant PFS 68.6 %. Acute radiotherapy-related complications (grades 1-2) were detected in virtually all eyes treated with CRT. Cataracts developed in only patients who were irradiated with more than 34 Gy. LDRT was well tolerated with only mild acute and late complications. CONCLUSION: Primary radiotherapy of indolent orbital lymphomas is an effective treatment with high response rates and excellent local control in CRT and LDRT. In combination with close follow-up, LDRT may be an attractive alternative since re-irradiation even with conventional doses is still feasible.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective To investigate the value of local progression-free survival (LPFS) for evaluating the local long-term outcome of peripheral lung cancer treated by cyberknife.Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical records of 81 cyberknife-treated lung cancer patients (90 foci),including 43 primary lung cancer patients (43 foci) and 38 metastatic lung cancer patients (47 foci).Of all the patients,58(63 foci) were treated at a dose of 60 Gy/3 fractions (20 Gy/fraction),and 23 (27 foci) at a dose of 54 Gy/3 fractions (18 Gy/fraction).The short-term treatment outcome and LPFS were used as the indices for observation;a logistic regression was used for analyzing the predictive value of LPFS for local long-term treatment outcome.Results After the evaluation of short-term treatment outcome,63％ of all the foci needed further evaluation.As the follow-up lasted,the number of foci which needed further evaluation decreased,most rapidly during 0.5-2 years after treatment.Re-evaluation results had predictive value for the treatment outcome in the subsequent follow-up,but the predictive value declined as the follow-up lasted.Conclusions LPFS is a recommendable index for evaluating the local outcome of primary or metastatic lung cancer treated by cyberknife,and it also has predicative value for local long-term treatment outcome.