RESUMEN
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, locally aggressive cutaneous sarcoma with a propensity for recurrence. Its management, particularly in the head and neck (H&N) region, presents unique challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) compared to wide local excision (WLE) in treating H&N DFSP and its impact on recurrence rates and tissue preservation. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, yielding 29 relevant studies. We included studies comparing MMS and WLE in adult patients with H&N DFSP and reporting local recurrence outcomes. Data were analyzed using random effects analysis, with a meta-analysis performed for comparative studies. Analysis of studies demonstrated a lower recurrence for MMS. Comparative analysis of five studies involving 117 patients showed a significantly lower recurrence rate in the MMS group (2%) compared to the WLE group (19%). Margin status varied between studies, with some achieving negative margins at shorter distances. In the management of H&N DFSP, MMS has emerged as a superior surgical technique, consistently associated with reduced recurrence rates and the potential for tissue preservation. The adoption of MMS should be considered for its capacity to achieve negative margins with fewer processing steps, particularly in anatomically complex regions like the H&N.
Asunto(s)
Dermatofibrosarcoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Adulto , Humanos , Dermatofibrosarcoma/cirugía , Cirugía de Mohs/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugíaRESUMEN
Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) with tumor downsizing and downstaging has significantly impacted the number of patients considered to be appropriate candidates for transanal local excision (TLE). Some patients may harbor small residual lesions, restricted to the bowel wall. These patients, who exhibit major response ("near-complete") by digital rectal examination, endoscopic assessment, and radiological assessment may be considered for this approach. Although TLE is associated with minimal postoperative morbidity, a few clinical consequences and oncological outcomes must be evaluated in advance and with caution. In the setting of nCRT, a higher risk for clinically relevant wound dehiscences leading to a considerable risk for readmission for pain management has been observed. Worse anorectal function (still better than after total mesorectal excision [TME]), worsening in the quality of TME specimen, and higher rates of abdominal resections (in cases requiring completion TME) have been reported. The exuberant scar observed in the area of TLE also represents a challenging finding during follow-up of these patients. Local excision should be probably restricted for patients with primary tumors located at or below the level of the anorectal ring (magnetic resonance defined). These patients are otherwise candidates for abdominal perineal resections or ultra-low anterior resections with coloanal anastomosis frequently requiring definitive stomas or considerably poor anorectal function.
RESUMEN
A proliferating pilar tumor is a rare skin neoplasm that arises from the outer root sheath of a hair follicle. Presentation varies widely, as the tumor can be benign or malignant and has a high probability of recurring after excision. We report our experience managing 3 proliferating pilar tumors with different clinical presentations and pathology findings at Hospital de San José, Bogota, Colombia.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Cabello/patología , Folículo Piloso , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Cuero Cabelludo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Colombia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Enfermedades del Cabello/cirugía , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Basocelulares/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugíaRESUMEN
Radical surgery is considered as the standard treatment for rectal cancer. Transanal local excision has been considered an interesting alternative for the management of selected patients with rectal cancers for many decades. Different approaches had been considered for local excision, from endoscopic submucosal dissection to resections using platforms, such as transanal endoscopic microsurgery or transanal minimally invasive surgery. Identifying the ideal candidate for this approach is crucial, as a local failure after local excision is associated with poor outcomes, even for an initial early rectal tumor. In this article, the diagnostic tools and criteria to select patients for local excision, the different modalities used, and the outcomes are discussed.
RESUMEN
In recent years, our understanding of rectal cancer has improved, including how locally advanced disease responds to chemotherapy and radiation. This has led to new innovations and advances in the treatment of rectal cancer, which includes organ-preserving strategies for responsive disease, and minimally invasive approaces for the performance of total mesorectal excision/protectomyh for persistently advanced disease. This article discusses new strategies for rectal cancer therapy, including Watch and Wait, local excision, minimally invasive proctectomy, and transanal total mesorectal excision particularly in the setting of preoperative multimodality treatment.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radiografía , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Recto/patologíaRESUMEN
AIM: Full-thickness local excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with rectal cancer and incomplete clinical response has been a treatment strategy for organ preservation. Follow-up of these patients is challenging since anatomic distortion and postoperative changes may be clinically indistinguishable from tumour recurrence. MRI may have a role in detecting recurrence. The aim of this study was to describe the MRI findings during follow-up in patients having local excision following CRT with and without local recurrence. METHOD: The data were collected retrospectively from a single centre. Fifty-three patients with rectal cancer who had full-thickness local excision after neoadjuvant CRT and near-complete response were eligible for the study. Patients with local recurrence were treated by radical salvage surgery. The main outcome was local MRI assessment findings during follow-up. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (five who developed local recurrence and 10 with no evidence of local recurrence) had MR images available for review and were included in the study. High signal intensity and thickening of the rectal wall were present in all patients with recurrent disease within the rectal wall. Overall, 80% of the patients with recurrence showed diffusion restriction. MRI mesorectal fascia status and circumferential resection margin showed agreement in all cases. A low signal intensity scar was seen in all patients without recurrent disease. CONCLUSION: MRI shows high signal intensity and thickening of the rectal wall in recurrent disease in comparison to a low signal intensity fibrotic scar in non-recurrent disease. These findings may be useful in surveillance of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Microcirugía Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Periodo Posoperatorio , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Recuperativa , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Disposable single-port surgery devices have been used for transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) with benefits, when compared to local resection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Objective: To show outcomes and details of the technique. Method: A series of patients with indication for local resection of rectal tumors were submitted to surgery using the TAMIS platform. Results: Eleven patients have been submitted to TAMIS. Distance from anal verge was from 1.5 to 8 cm and maximum tumor diameter was 6 cm. Initial diagnosis of adenoma was the most frequent indication for resection. One partial dehiscence was the only complication seen. Minimal setup time, low cost and the possibility of using regular laparoscopic instruments make TAMIS a good option for transanal resection. The results of this technique are encouraging, concerning the feasibility, maneuverability, upfront cost, setup time, resectability and complication rate. Because of its simplicity and similarity with conventional laparoscopic surgery, it can be learned easily. Although at the present time the appropriate use of local excision is still under debate, TAMIS is a technique that still expects a lot of growing and much remains to be learned. (AU)
Dispositivos cirúrgicos de porta única descartáveis têm sido utilizados para a Cirurgia Trans-anal Minimamente Invasiva (CTAMI) com benefícios, quando comparados com ressecção local e microcirurgia endoscópica trans-anal (MET). Objetivo: Apresentar os desfechos e detalhes da técnica. Método: Uma série de pacientes com indicação para ressecção local de tumores retais foi tratada cirurgicamente pela plataforma CTAMI. Resultados: Onze pacientes foram tratados por CTAMI. A distância a contar da margem anal variou de 1,5 até 8 cm, e o diâmetro máximo do tumor foi 6 cm. Um diagnóstico inicial de adenoma foi a indicação mais frequente para a ressecção. A única complicação ocorrida foi uma deiscência parcial. Mínimo tempo para preparação, baixo custo e a possibilidade do uso de instrumentos laparoscópicos convencionais fazem de CTAMI uma boa opção para a ressecção trans-anal. Os resultados dessa técnica são animadores, no que diz respeito à exeqüibilidade, manobrabilidade, custos iniciais, tempo de preparação, ressectabilidade e percentual de complicações. Graças à sua simplicidade e semelhança com a cirurgia laparoscópica convencional, CTAMI tem uma fácil curva de aprendizado. Embora atualmente ainda seja motivo de discussão o uso apropriado da excisão local, CTAMI é uma técnica que ainda provavelmente ainda crescerá muito–e há muito a ser aprendido. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Cirugía Endoscópica Transanal , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tempo OperativoRESUMEN
Introducción: los programas de screening y la mejora en las técnicas diagnósticas han aumentado el porcentaje de tumores rectales que se pueden tratar en estadios iniciales. La morbimortalidad asociada a la cirugía radical de la neoplasia rectal, así como la tendencia a una cirugía menos agresiva, ha hecho que se desarrollen las técnicas de abordaje transanal, aplicando las últimas tecnologías disponibles. Material y métodos: se realizó una revisión de la literatura, considerando las diferentes técnicas de excisión endoscópica. Resultados: la cirugía endoscópica transanal, en todas sus variantes, ha demostrado ser un abordaje seguro para el tratamiento de adenomas y tumores rectales en estadios iniciales (pT1N0). Conclusión: son necesarios más estudios que permitan demostrar la seguridad de ampliar esta técnica para el tratamiento de lesiones avanzadas, asociada a quimio-radioterapia neoadyuvante.
Background: screening programs and improvement of diagnostic techniques have increased the percentage of rectal tumors that can be treated in an early stage. Radical surgery of the rectum is associated with high morbimortality, and the general tendency towards a less aggressive surgery has led to the development of transanal techniques, adjusting the latest technologies available. Methods: a review of the literature, including the different types of endoscopic surgery available. Results: transanal endoscopic microsurgery, in all its variants, has proven to be a safe and effective method for treating rectal adenomas and early stage cancer (pT1N0). Conclusion: further studies are required to prove the safeness of these techniques on more advanced lesions, in association with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/instrumentación , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/tendencias , Cirugía Colorrectal/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente InvasivosRESUMEN
RACIONAL: A excisão total do mesorreto é considerada a operação padrão no tratamento dos tumores do reto, apesar de não existir comprovação científica de que ela deva ser usada para todos os estádios da doença. Tem sido demonstrado que em casos escolhidos de tumores retais, resultados promissores podem ser conseguidos com tratamento local por microcirurgia endoscópica transanal. Tais tumores, denominados de câncer retal precoce, são tumores T1 - menores do que 4 cm -, bem diferenciados sem invasão angiolinfática pT1 Sm1. Como o risco de comprometimento linfonodal nesses tumores é de aproximadamente 3 por cento, a ressecção local teria grande chance de ser curativa. OBJETIVO: Apresentar os resultados de uma série prospectiva não randômica de pacientes portadores de câncer retal precoce submetidos ao tratamento local por microcirurgia endoscópica transanal. MÉTODOS: Entre 2002 e 2010, 38 pacientes avaliados por protocolo pré-operatório como portadores câncer retal precoce foram submetidos à ressecção local endoscópica microcirúrgica de toda a parede retal com o tumor quando localizado entre 2 e 8 cm da linha pectínea. A avaliação pré-operatória consistiu de toque retal, retossigmoidoscopia rígida para macrobiópsias, enema opaco e/ou colonoscopia, ultrassonografia endoretal e abdominal, tomografia axial computadorizada do abdome, radiografia do tórax e dosagem sérica do CEA. Realizou-se seguimento pós-operatório endoscópico e ultrassonográfico endoretal a cada três meses nos dois primeiros anos, e a cada seis nos próximos três anos, além de dosagem do CEA a cada seis meses nesse mesmo período de cinco anos. Avaliou-se a recidiva tumoral, morbidade e mortalidade. RESULTADOS: Após avaliação anatomopatológica da lesão, 29 cânceres retais precoces foram categorizados como de baixo risco e nove sendo de alto. O seguimento na série variou de um a sete anos. Recidiva tumoral foi confirmada em dois casos dos 38 (5,26 por cento), uma lesão considerada de alto...
BACKGROUND: The total mesorectal excision is considered the standard operation in the treatment of rectal tumors, although there is no scientific proof that it should be used for all stages of the disease. It has been demonstrated that in selected cases of rectal tumors, promising results can be achieved with local treatment by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. These tumors, called early rectal cancer, T1 tumors, are less than 4 cm, well differentiated without angiolymphatic invasion - pT1 SM1. As the risk of lymph node involvement in these tumors is approximately 3 percent, local resection would have a great chance to be curative. AIM: To present the results of a non-random prospective series of patients with early rectal cancer treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2010, 38 patients evaluated by preoperative protocol as patients with early rectal cancer underwent endoscopic microsurgical resection of the entire rectal wall including the tumor when located between 2 and 8 cm from the dentate line. The preoperative evaluation consisted of digital rectal examination, rigid sigmoidoscopy macrobiopsies, barium enema and/or colonoscopy, endorectal ultrasound and abdominal computed tomography of the abdomen, chest radiography and serum CEA. Was conducted follow-up with endoscopy and endorectal ultrasound every three months during the first two years, and every six in the next three years, and CEA every six months during the same period of five years. Was evaluated the tumor recurrence, morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Pathologic evaluation considered 29 categorized as low risk and nine being high. The follow-up in the series ranged from one to seven years. Tumor recurrence was confirmed in two of the 38 cases (5.26 percent), in one the lesion was considered high and another low risk. CONCLUSION: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery associated or not to adjuvant therapy, may be, currently, considered the gold standard in...