RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited-open and percutaneous Achilles tendon (AT) repair techniques have limited visibility, which may result in sural nerve violation and poor tendon targeting. The goal of this study was to assess the in vivo rotation of the AT and its distance to the sural nerve in ruptured and nonruptured ATs to develop guidelines to aid in limited-open and percutaneous repair techniques. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of patients with ruptured and healthy (nonruptured) ATs. AT rotation and distance to the sural nerve in the anterior-posterior (A-P) and medial-lateral (M-L) planes were measured at the level of and proximal to the ankle. RESULTS: The AT was externally rotated in both ruptured and nonruptured cohorts. Ruptured ATs showed greater external rotation than nonruptured ATs at the ankle (15.8 ± 16.2 degrees vs 5.9 ± 9.0 degrees, P = .008) but not at 10 cm proximal to the tendon's insertion (10.9 ± 10.9 degrees vs 6.1 ± 8.4 degrees, P = .139). Proximal AT rotation was negatively correlated with rupture height (r = -0.477, P = .029). At 4 cm proximal to the AT insertion, the sural nerve was closer anteriorly to and farther laterally from the AT in ruptures than in nonruptures (P < .001). At 10 cm proximal to the AT insertion, the sural nerve was farther posteriorly and laterally from the AT in ruptures than in nonruptures (P = .027 and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: We found that the AT was more externally rotated in ruptured than in nonruptured tendons at the ankle and that its distance to the sural nerve differed between the 2 cohorts in the A-P and M-L planes, likely due to increased AT rotation and swelling with ruptures. To minimize sural nerve injury and improve tendon targeting, we suggest an external rotation of 11 degrees at the proximal end of the rupture and 16 degrees at the distal end when using percutaneous and limited-open AT repair devices to try to minimize sural nerve violation and increase tendon capture, which can decrease rates of complication and rerupture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Asunto(s)
Tendón Calcáneo/cirugía , Articulación del Tobillo/fisiología , Rotura/fisiopatología , Nervio Sural/lesiones , Traumatismos de los Tendones/cirugía , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Estudios Retrospectivos , RotaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Management of acute Achilles tendon rupture remains controversial. Open repair results in lower rerupture rates but is associated with complications from wound healing. Percutaneous and limited open repairs minimize soft tissue complications; however, there is a theoretical increased risk of sural nerve injury. We evaluated the risk of sural nerve violation with the Achillon limited open repair device in cadavers. METHODS: This cadaveric study consisted of 2 parts. The first part evaluated the frequency and location of sural nerve violation using the standard Achillon protocol in 18 intact embalmed left lower limbs. The second part involved device manipulation with 30 degrees of either internal or external rotation in 13 paired, intact embalmed lower limbs. RESULTS: In the first part, 5 of 18 specimens had at least 1 suture passing through the sural nerve. Eight of the 54 needle passes (14.8%) directly pierced the substance of the sural nerve. With internal rotation, 8 of 13 specimens had at least 1 violation of the nerve. Ten of the 39 needle passes (25.6%) directly pierced the substance of the sural nerve. With external rotation, no nerves were violated, significantly decreasing the risk of sural nerve violation versus neutral (P = .038) and internal rotation (P = .001). When sural nerve violation was evaluated in regard to instrument outlet, there was a higher risk in the proximal needle passer (outlet no. 3) compared with the distal needle passer (outlet no. 1) with both neutral testing and internal rotation (P = .027). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the potential risk for sural nerve injury using the Achillon device. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: External rotation of the Achillon decreased the rate of sural nerve violation. This may optimize its use in Achilles tendon repairs.
Asunto(s)
Tendón Calcáneo/cirugía , Nervio Sural/lesiones , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Cadáver , Humanos , Nervio Sural/anatomía & histología , SuturasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the early results of limited open repair technique of Achilles tendon ruptures, and to describe the surgical technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2004 to February 2005, a total of 10 patients with Achilles tendon rupture underwent limited open repair. The average age of the patients was 39.3 years, and the average follow-up period was 9 months. The causes of injury were sports injuries in 8 cases, and slip down in 2. The mean interval between the injury and the operation was 9 days. The clinical results were assessed by patient's satisfaction, incision length, hospitalization, the ankle-hindfoot scale of American Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), and complications. RESULTS: Of 10 patients, 8 were very satisfied, and the remaining 2 were satisfied. The mean incision length was 2.0 cm, and the mean hospitalization was 2 days. The mean AOFAS score was 97 points, and there was no complications such as infection, rerupture, or nerve injury. All patients returned to work at approximately 2 months, and resumed light exercise such as jogging at approximately 3 months. CONCLUSION: Limited open repair technique of Achilles tendon ruptures is provided for better cosmetic results, high patient's satisfaction, and functionally successful results without postoperative complications.