RESUMEN
Sleep difficulties are pervasive in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), yet how sleep problems relate to underlying biological mechanisms such as genetic etiology is unclear, despite recent reports of profound sleep problems in children with ASD-associated de novo likely gene disrupting (dnLGD) mutations, CHD8, DYRK1A, and ADNP. We aimed to inform etiological contributions to ASD and sleep by characterizing sleep problems in individuals with dnLGD mutations. Participants (N = 2886) were families who completed dichotomous questions about sleep problems within a medical history interview for their child with ASD (age 3-28 years). Confirmatory factor analyses compared between those with ASD and a dnLGD mutation and those with idiopathic ASD (i.e., no known genetic event, NON) highlighted four domains (sleep onset, breathing issues, nighttime awakenings, and daytime tiredness) with sleep onset as a strong factor for both groups. Overall, participant predictors indicated that internalizing behavioral problems and lower cognitive scores were related to increased sleep problems. Internalizing problems were also related to increase nighttime awakenings in the dnLGD group. As an exploratory aim, patterns of sleep issues are described for genetic subgroups with unique patterns including more overall sleep issues in ADNP (n = 19), problems falling asleep in CHD8 (n = 22), and increased daytime naps in DYRK1A (n = 23). Implications for considering genetically defined subgroups when approaching sleep problems in children with ASD are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Problema de Conducta , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/genética , Niño , Preescolar , Proteínas de Homeodominio , Humanos , Mutación , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous disorder. Promising initiatives utilizing interdisciplinary characterization of ASD suggest phenotypic subtypes related to specific likely gene-disrupting mutations (LGDMs). However, the role of functionally associated LGDMs in the neural social phenotype is unknown. METHODS: In this study of 26 children with ASD (n = 13 with an LGDM) and 13 control children, we characterized patterns of mu attenuation and habituation as children watched videos containing social and nonsocial motions during electroencephalography acquisition. RESULTS: Diagnostic comparisons were consistent with prior work suggesting aberrant mu attenuation in ASD within the upper mu band (10-12 Hz), but typical patterns within the lower mu band (8-10 Hz). Preliminary exploration indicated distinct social sensitization patterns (i.e., increasing mu attenuation for social motion) for children with an LGDM that is primarily expressed during embryonic development. In contrast, children with an LGDM primarily expressed post-embryonic development exhibited stable typical patterns of lower mu attenuation. Neural social indices were associated with social responsiveness, but not cognition. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest unique neurophysiological profiles for certain genetic etiologies of ASD, further clarifying possible genetic functional subtypes of ASD and providing insight into mechanisms for targeted treatment approaches.