RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Dental schools have a primary responsibility to devise a curriculum that enhances students' confidence and knowledge in orthodontic case analysis. This study aims to compare the confidence levels and performance of undergraduate students in orthodontic case screening, moderated by faculty in a lecture-based format against their self-analysis of the same cases 1 year later, using a case-based and flipped learning approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 100 fifth-year students. The same group received predoctoral orthodontics training through an instructor-centered, didactic approach in their fifth year and a case-based, student-centered, flipped classroom approach in their sixth year. At the end of each semester, the students completed an orthodontic case analysis and a self-reflection survey. RESULTS: This study found no significant differences in diagnostic capabilities for orthodontic findings between the two methods studied. However, the self-evaluation survey data revealed an increase in students' confidence levels. This was specifically in terms of carrying out independent orthodontic case diagnosis, effectively communicating with orthodontic specialists, and their comfort in approaching orthodontic cases following the flipped classroom approach. Despite increased confidence in case diagnosis, the results showed that final-year students are uncertain about creating initial treatment plans and referring cases at an early stage. CONCLUSION: Despite no observed improvement in students' orthodontic diagnostic abilities after another semester of student-centered learning, their confidence in diagnosing orthodontic cases was notably enhanced.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of implementing a data-driven blended online-offline (DDBOO) teaching approach in the medicinal chemistry course. METHODS: A total of 118 third-year students majoring in pharmacy were enrolled from September 2021 to January 2022. The participants were randomly assigned to either the DDBOO teaching group or the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) group for medicinal chemistry. Pre- and post-class quizzes were administered, along with an anonymous questionnaire distributed to both groups to assess students' perceptions and experiences. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the pre-class quiz scores between the DDBOO and LBL groups (T=-0.637, P = 0.822). However, after class, the mean quiz score of the DDBOO group was significantly higher than that of the LBL group (T = 3.742, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the scores for learning interest, learning motivation, self-learning skill, mastery of basic knowledge, teamwork skills, problem-solving ability, innovation ability, and satisfaction, as measured by the questionnaire, were significantly higher in the DDBOO group than in the traditional group (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The DDBOO teaching method effectively enhances students' academic performance and satisfaction. Further research and promotion of this approach are warranted.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The accurate diagnosis and effective management of arrhythmias are crucial, with nurses playing a key role in the early detection and treatment, significantly impacting patient outcomes. Improving education on arrhythmias among nurses, especially in critical care and perioperative settings, can enhance patient safety and the quality of care. METHODS: A total of 116 trainee nurses were randomly divided into two groups: one utilizing the conceive-design-implement-operate (CDIO) model and the other employing a traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) method, to undergo arrhythmia training. The studyassessed the effects of the two teaching methods and investigated the students' attitudes toward these educational practices, with all participants completing pre- and post-course tests. RESULTS: The CDIO model significantly enhances nursing students' arrhythmia proficiency, yielding higher test scores and sustained improvement after 24-week compared to the traditional LBL method, alongside markedly better self-learning enthusiasm, understanding, satisfaction with the teaching approach and effectiveness, and interest in learning arrhythmia. The CDIO model in nursing arrhythmia courses boosts theoretical knowledge and application, showing potential in clinical skill enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: Our study introduces the CDIO model in nursing arrhythmia courses, with improvement in knowledge and skills, and promise for broader application.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of team-, case-, lecture-, and evidence-based learning (TCLEBL) methods in cultivating students' clinical and research abilities, as compared to traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) approaches. METHODS: Forty-one medical postgraduates were divided into two groups, a TCLEBL group and an LBL group. Teaching effectiveness was evaluated through student- and teacher-feedback questionnaires, scores from theoretical examinations and written literature reviews, and student learning burdens. RESULTS: Compared to the LBL approach, both teachers and students were more satisfied with the TCLEBL model (p < 0.001 for both teachers and students). The TCLEBL group performed significantly higher on the theory test compared to the LBL group (p = 0.009). There were significant differences between the LBL and TCLEBL groups, respectively, in terms of literature review and citations (12.683 ± 2.207 vs. 16.302 ± 1.095, p < 0.001), argument and perspective (12.55 ± 1.572 vs. 16.333 ± 1.354, p < 0.001), comprehensiveness of content (13.3 ± 2.268 vs. 16.683 ± 1.344, p < 0.001), and scientific rigor and accuracy (10.317 ± 1.167 vs. 12.746 ± 0.706, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the total extracurricular time expended between the two groups (323.75 ± 30.987 min vs. 322.619 ± 24.679 min, respectively for LBL vs. TCLEBL groups, p = 0.898). CONCLUSIONS: TCLEBL is an effective teaching method that cultivates students' clinical and research abilities.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effect of team-based learning on the core competence of nursing students compared with traditional teaching methods. BACKGROUND: In recent years, team-based learning has been widely used as a learning and teaching method in the world. Not only the necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes, but also the core competence is necessary to cope with various clinical situations for nursing students. However, the effect of this new teaching method on core competence of nursing students is not consistent. DESIGN: The study was designed according to the preferred reporting entries guidelines statement for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and population, intervention, comparison, outcome and study. METHODS: Data were collected from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect and Scopus. The quality of studies was assessed using "The Newcastle Ottawa scale". A random-effect model of meta-analyses was conducted to generate pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) for core competence using Rev Man 5.4.1 software and STATASE 15. Moreover, subgroup, heterogeneity, sensitivity and publication bias analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 14 articles with 1942 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the traditional pedagogy among nursing students, team-based learning pedagogy significantly increased theoretical performance, professional effects (self-directed learning ability and communication ability) but did not affect practice skills. In addition, one study found that learning attitudes were not improved in students with high or low academic performance. This might mean that the teaching model should be implemented for a long time, which essentially changed students' learning attitudes to improve students' self-directed learning ability and core competence, especially for students with low scores. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, findings indicated that team-based learning pedagogical approaches might be beneficial to improve teaching quality in nursing education. However, practice skills might not be sensitive to team-based learning because of the seriation of the original course. Nursing educators need to explore teaching strategies to cultivate high-quality nursing talents to cultivate nursing students with core competence and ensure that they are successfully qualified for new employment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate stomatological students' learning efficacy and their attitude towards Lecture-Team-Based Learning (LTBL) on topics regarding the design of removable partial dentures via in-class, online, and both in combination. METHODS: Students from seven distinct grades participated in the course in their fourth academic year (Years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021). Students of Years 2015-2019 attended in-class LTBL, students of Year 2020 attended online LTBL, and students of Year 2021 attended the combination mode. The scores of three examinations were compared, namely, individual readiness assessment test, team readiness assurance test, and individual application test. Visual Analog Scales (VAS) were used for students to self-assess their mastery of prosthodontics knowledge before and after the course. Anonymous questionnaires were delivered to evaluate their satisfaction with LTBL via a Likert scale. RESULTS: In each academic year, the three exam scores were significantly improved as the course progressed and VAS-post scores were significantly higher than VAS-pre scores. The three examination and VAS scores of students in Year 2020 were significantly lower than those in Years 2019 and 2021. Students were highly satisfied with the LTBL course based on the three parameters of knowledge acquisition, teamwork, and classroom atmosphere. CONCLUSION: Students were highly satisfied with the LTBL course and their learning performance was improved as the course progressed both in-class and online. Online LTBL could be adopted when students have to study online, while in-class LTBL could perform better when combined with video records of an online LTBL course.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Interpreting an electrocardiogram (ECG) is a vital skill for nurses in cardiology. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the bridge-in, objective, preassessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary (BOPPPS) model, when combined with case-based learning (CBL), in enhancing nursing students' ECG interpretation capabilities. MATERIALS & METHODS: Nursing students were randomly divided into two groups: one utilizing the BOPPPS model combined with CBL (BOPPPS-CBL), and the other employing a traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) model. All participants underwent training and completed pre- and post-course quizzes. RESULTS: The BOPPPS-CBL model significantly improved nursing students' abilities in ECG interpretation compared to the traditional LBL model group. The BOPPPS-CBL model proved to be a comprehensive and effective method for enhancing students' attitudes towards teaching and learning. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrated for the first time that the BOPPPS-CBL model is an innovative and effective method for promoting nurses' accuracy in ECG interpretation. It highlights the potential of this approach as a superior alternative to traditional learning methods.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the impact of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching models on students' learning in surgical education. METHODS: We systematically searched the publications related to the application of PBL and LBL in surgical courses in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, the last retrieval time is September 20, 2022. After screening the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting data and evaluating the methodological treatment of the included studies, Stata 17.0 software was used to perform meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine studies were included totally. The results showed that compared with LBL, PBL was superior in clinical competence (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.12 ~ 1.49, P = 0.020) and student satisfaction (SMD = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.11 ~ 3.15, P < 0.0001) with significant differences. But the comprehensive scores (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI: -0.37 ~ 0.89, P = 0.421) and theoretical knowledge (SMD=-0.19, 95% CI: -0.71 ~ 0.33, P = 0.482) to PBL and LBL had no significant difference. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the PBL teaching model is more effective than the LBL teaching model in surgical education on the aspects of enhancing clinical competence and student satisfaction. However, further well-designed studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Lecture-based learning (LBL) strategy cannot stimulate learners' ability to think and learn independently. Recently team-based learning (TBL), a learner-centered strategy, gained popularity in health education. An interactive response system (IRS) assists educators in providing instant feedback on classroom activities. This study was to evaluate the TBL strategy supplemented by IRS (TBL/IRS) on the learning effects of the core course, the human growth and development (HGD), in nursing education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quasi-experimental study design with two-group, pretests and posttests was employed with year-one students enrolled in two HGD classes in the nursing department of a university in central Taiwan. Both HGD classes employed the LBL method at the beginning of a semester. TBL/IRS strategy was introduced to the experimental class 6 weeks later. Three scales were used to measure self-directed learning, classroom engagement, and team learning. Individual and group readiness assurance tests (IRATs and GRATs) were administered. Final exams were also compared between the groups. For thematic analysis, learners' experience with TBL/IRS was collected from learner reports and a semi-structured questionnaire designed for the study. RESULTS: A total of 105 learners-48 in TBL/IRS and 55 in LBL-were recruited. Self-directed learning, classroom engagement and team learning were improved significantly in TBL/IRS whereas only self-directed learning was improved in LBL. In the TBL/IRS group, GRAT scores were significantly higher than IRAT. However, the difference in final exams between the groups was non-significant. Four themes emerged from learners' experiences with TBL/IRS: stimulate self-learning; a diverse and flexible learning method; promote high-level thinking and deepen learning results; and, cultivate teamwork and application. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that TBL/IRS was effective in enhancing learners' abilities to integrate concepts and skills, thereby cultivating competence in problem-solving and teamwork. The TBL/IRS strategy was cost-effective in promoting active learning of HGD in nursing students.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Case-based learning (CBL) is an effective teaching-learning strategy that provides a learning environment similar to actual practice. The aim of the present study was to determine the nursing student's satisfaction with two methods of CBL and lecture-based learning. METHODS: This descriptive observational study was conducted in 2019 in School of Nursing and Midwifery in Ilam. All 128 undergraduate nursing students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th semesters of nursing were enrolled in the study to compare students' satisfaction with CBL and lecture-based learning. Data collection tools included a demographic information questionnaire and a researcher-made questionnaire consisting of 20 questions based on the Likert scale. Data analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 22. RESULTS: More than two thirds of the students (81.3%) found the CBL method was better than lectures. 60% of male students and 62% of female students stated that the CBL method increased their self-confidence compared to the traditional lecture-based learning (p < 0.03). Students were very satisfied with the CBL method (9.1 ± 1.1 out of 10). There was no significant relationship between gender-related features, and the mean score of students' satisfaction with the CBL method (p > 0.05). However, 4th semester students were more satisfied than other students (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The results show that CBL, as a teaching-learning technique in specialized nursing courses, increases students' satisfaction and self-confidence compared to lecture.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective:To systematically evaluate the teaching effect of problem-based learning (PBL) plus case-based learning (CBL) versus lecture-based learning (LBL) in surgical internships in Chinese medical students.Methods:We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, and WanFang Data for randomized controlled studies evaluating PBL+CBL versus LBL in surgical internships in Chinese medical students. The retrieval time was from database establishment to June 2019. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software.Results:Seventeen randomized controlled trials were included, involving a total of 1161 students, including 581 in the PBL+CBL group and 580 in the LBL group. Meta-analysis results showed that the PBL+CBL group had significantly higher scores of theory examination [mean difference ( MD)=6.15, 95%CI=4.14-8.15, P<0.001], skill examination ( MD=7.67, 95%CI=3.66-11.69, P<0.001), and case analysis ( MD=6.06, 95%CI=2.89-9.23, P=0.000 2) compared with the control group. The PBL+CBL group had a significantly higher percentage of satisfaction with the teaching results than the LBL group [odds ratio( OR)=2.98, 95%CI=1.88-4.73, P<0.001]. Conclusion:PBL+CBL is superior to LBL in medical students' surgical internships, which needs verification by more high-quality studies due to limitations in the number and quality of the included studies.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explored the effects of the Cardiac Rhythm Identification for Simple People (CRISP) method with flipped classroom approach for arrhythmia interpretation in electrocardiogram (ECG) by trainee nurses. METHODS: A total of 120 trainee nurses were enrolled and randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group using lecture-based learning method. We observed the effects of the two methods in ECG interpretation training and investigated the students' attitudes toward the teaching practices. RESULTS: After training, the ECG test scores in the experimental group were significantly higher than that of the control group. Six months later, the ECG test scores of the experimental group was still higher. Self-learning enthusiasm, understanding of teaching content, satisfaction of teaching mode, satisfaction of teaching effectiveness, and interest in learning ECG were significantly higher in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: CRISP method with flipped classroom approach is a new and effective mode worth trying in ECG teaching for trainee nurses.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: Traditional standardized training in ultrasound-guided minimally invasive breast surgery (UMIBS) focused on lecture-based learning (LBL) resulted in students' insufficient analysis, limited spatial visual conversion ability, and poor practical application. This study examined the effects of the step-by-step (SBS) method combined with a simulation model in UMIBS education. Subjects and Methods: A total of 84 residents participated in this study. The residents were divided into the SBS group (experience group, n=42) and the LBL group (control group, n=42), and the same teacher taught the two groups to ensure a comparable result. Based on the pork simulation model, two experts evaluated student performance scores, and the total time taken by each student was also counted. The participants were surveyed with 7 questions after the training, and each answer was assigned a score of 1, 2 or 3 to compare the participants' satisfaction. Results: The average value of the surgical skills for SBS group were significantly higher than LBS group, which was 82.8±4.4 and 72.7±4.0 (t=4.27, P<0.001), the time spend of neoplasm localization by the experience group was significantly less than the control group, which was 17.9±1.6 and 20.9±1.2 secs, (t=1.58, P<0.001), and there were significant differences in puncture accuracy and excision integrity between the two groups (P<0.05). In addition, the results of the questionnaire survey showed that learning interest, surgical ability and satisfaction were better in the SBS group than in the LBS group (P<0.05), and there were no significant differences in clinical thinking and learning pressure between the two groups. Conclusion: The SBS teaching method may help to improve the surgical skills and learning interest, as well as reduce adverse reactions and cultivate clinical thinking of the students in UMIBS training. Future studies could consider multicenter clinical research to further confirm the practicality of this teaching method and reduce the risk of deviation.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Problem based learning is being highly implemented in many medical schools worldwide due to its perceived advantages including improvement of problem-solving abilities, development of communication skills, creation and development of critical thinking skill, and making of individuals to be lifelong learners & responsible for their own learning process. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare academic satisfaction of Problem and Lecture based learning of regular undergraduate health science students in Ethiopian Universities, 2021. METHOD: Institution based comparative cross sectional study was conducted from February 1-30, 2021. Data were collected using a pretested structured and self-administered questionnaire among 850 eligible students from two Universities. Data were entered into EPI info version 6.04 and analyzed using SPSS version 23. Binary Logistic regression model was fitted to identify factors associated with academic satisfaction considering the association to be significant p- value < 0.05. RESULT: The study result revealed that the magnitude of academic satisfaction among problem based and lecture based learning students were 50.9 and 49.9% respectively. Similarly, problem based learning students were more likely to be academically satisfied than lecture based learning students in their type of curriculum with (AOR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.02, 2.21). Experience of classroom distress (AOR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.22, 3.06), quality of teaching (AOR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.34, 0.86), relationship with classmates (AOR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.13, 0.80), course content (AOR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.33, 0.93) and accessibility of technology in the campus (AOR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.40, 0.96) were the significant factors of academic satisfaction of problem based learning students. Year of study (AOR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.17, 0.48), quality of teaching (AOR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.85), course content (AOR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.35, 0.97) and energy & effort (AOR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.35, 0.88) were significantly associated with academic satisfaction among lecture based learning students. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the academic satisfaction among problem based learning students was higher than lecture based learning students. Incorporating and implementing problem based learning as a formal instructional method in across the universities curriculum is recommended.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Standardized residency training (SRT) is crucial for graduate medical education and the training of high-quality doctors. Nevertheless, China started SRT nationwide only in the recent decade. During these years, researchers have been searching for suitable teaching methods to improve the abilities of residents. Although the problem-based learning (PBL) teaching mode has been applied in undergraduate teaching for many years, the teaching effect of PBL has not been unified in Chinese SRT according to the core competences of the residents. METHODS: Studies that compared the teaching effect of PBL and lecture-based learning (LBL) on SRT in China from January 2010 to April 2020 in the Chinese databases, such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, WeiPu, Chinese BioMedical Literature (CBM), and English-language online databases, such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed. Data were analyzed using the Stata version 12.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 75 articles (76 studies) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with LBL group, PBL-based methods are more effective in the mastery of medical theory knowledge (WMD = 7.14, 95% CI: 5.93-8.34), operational skills (WMD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.55-8.53), analysis and diagnosis of cases (WMD = 8.52, 95% CI: 7.50-9.53), and overall capacity (WMD = 8.70, 95% CI: 6.87-10.53), but showed no advantage on operational skills in diagnostic imaging (WMD = 1.30, 95% CI: -0.11-2.71). The questionnaire surveys analyzed in this meta-analysis indicated the positive effects of PBL on the mastery of theoretical knowledge, clinical diagnostic thinking, teamwork ability, ability to analyze and solve problems, ability to consult documents, learning interest and learning efficiency, but that there were no advantages in improving self-directed learning ability, communication ability and hands-on ability. The questionnaire result analyzed in this meta-analysis also showed the residents' satisfaction with PBL-based strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, the current meta-analysis provides a systematic and comprehensive analysis on PBL teaching mode in Chinese SRT and outlines a path for further research on the detailed design of suitable teaching methods for different specialties and abilities.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Our study aims to identify, appraise, and summarize randomized controlled trials (RCT) on the effectiveness of team-based learning (TBL) versus lecture-based learning (LBL) in nursing students. Methods: We searched PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane, CBM, VIP, CNKI, and Wan Fang databases from inception to 22nd July 2022 to enroll RCTs that compared TBL versus LBL. The studies reporting the performance of nursing students receiving TBL pedagogy compared to those receiving traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) were to be analyzed. Scores of academic or nursing abilities were considered the primary outcome, and the results of nursing competencies, students' engagement with, behaviors, attitudes toward, experience, satisfaction, or perceptions of TBL were considered the secondary outcome. This systematic review was conducted following the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Results: A total of 1,009 participants in 10 RCTs were enrolled in this study. Of the 10 RCTs, eight studies investigated undergraduate students, one involved vocational college students, and one enrolled secondary school students. The most reported outcomes were class engagement survey toward TBL (n = 8); students' ability (n = 5), academic knowledge or performance (n = 4); students' experience (n = 4), satisfaction or perceptions of TBL (n = 4). Conclusion: This review suggested that the TBL was an effective pedagogy in improving academic performance and general ability in nursing students. High-quality trials are needed, and standardized outcomes should be used.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective:To explore the effect of combined problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) on the teaching of skeletal motor system diseases for eight-year clinical medicine program students.Methods:The clinical eight-year medical students from Batch 2014 and 2015 participating in the teaching of "osteoarthritis" in the course of Skeletal Motor System Diseases in West China Clinical Medical College of Sichuan University were divided into control group (60 students) and experimental group (82 students). The control group was taught by LBL teaching method, while the experimental group was taught by PBL+LBL teaching method. A questionnaire survey was conducted to retrospectively analyze the teaching effects, including learning enthusiasm, knowledge understanding, thinking ability, teamwork ability, practical ability, self-learning ability and teacher-student relationship, as well as the evaluation of teaching satisfaction. The SPSS 22.0 software was used for t test and chi-square test. Results:The survey results showed that students in the experimental group were significantly superior to those in the control group in such aspects as learning enthusiasm (8.00±1.61 vs. 7.28±1.98), knowledge understanding (8.02±1.59 vs. 7.33±1.79), thinking ability (8.34±1.66 vs. 7.42±1.90), teamwork ability (8.32±1.76 vs. 6.60±2.79), practical ability (7.70±1.69 vs. 6.87 ± 2.57), self-learning ability (8.05±1.65 vs. 7.35±2.48) and teacher-student relationship (7.96±1.75 vs. 7.25±2.10), with statistically significant differences ( P<0.05). Meanwhile, the PBL+LBL group was more satisfied with the teaching mode than the LBL group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusion:The application of PBL+LBL teaching method in clinical medicine eight-year program course teaching of "osteoarthritis" in Skeletal Motor System Diseases can effectively improve the learning enthusiasm of students, improve the quality of education, and obtain good teaching effect.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine whether the teaching method of seminars combined with case-based learning (CBL) is superior to the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) for teaching cancer pain in medical oncology internship. METHODS: Sixty medical and nursing interns in the medical oncology department of our hospital were selected between January 2019 and December 2020. Thirty students received traditional LBL instruction as the control group, and 30 students received combined seminars and CBL instruction as the observation group. The teaching evaluation and assessment was performed by theoretical and practical examinations and questionnaires. RESULTS: In the after-class examination, case analysis, clinical practice and overall scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (all p < 0.001). Theoretical knowledge scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.470). In the questionnaire regarding attitudes towards opioid use, the observation group had better perceptions of using opioids than the control group (all p < 0.01). In the meantime, students in the observation group outperformed the control group in four aspects: self-learning (p < 0.001), analytical and problem-solving (p < 0.001), clinical thinking (p = 0.001), and clinical practice (p = 0.002) abilities all improved, while stimulating learning interest (p = 0.184) and enhancing theoretical knowledge mastery (p = 0.221) were not significantly different from those of the control group. Overall, students in the observation group were more satisfied with the teaching, teaching methods and teacher performances than the control group (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to the LBL, the combination of seminars and CBL is a more effective teaching method for cancer pain management, which is worth further study.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The lecture-based learning (LBL) implemented in most Indonesian nursing/midwifery schools underlies the students' lack of ability in clinical reasoning. Team-based learning (TBL) was proposed to improve the students' ability in clinical reasoning as it is applying a course concept of real complex scenarios. In this study, we aimed to assess and compare the effects of TBL and LBL of postpartum hemorrhage topics on the clinical reasoning and classroom engagement of midwifery students in Indonesia. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of TBL and LBL. The unit was schools and random allocation was conducted using a simple random sampling method (i.e., coin flipping). There was 1 cluster in the intervention group (n = 62 students) and 1 cluster in the control group (n = 53 students). The students in the intervention group participated in a TBL class (90 min) three times, whereas the students in the control group attended an LBL class on postpartum hemorrhage topics. The primary outcome was the clinical reasoning on postpartum hemorrhage score measured at pre-test, post-test, and 2 weeks post-test. The secondary outcome was Classroom Engagement Survey (CES) score measured after each class finished. We used an unpaired t-test to evaluate the differences between the two groups. The baseline characteristics of the participants were compared using standardized difference. RESULTS: We evaluated a total of 115 participants. Regarding the baseline characteristics, there was a small difference in the age, Grade Point Average and knowledge at pre-test between the intervention and control groups. The mean clinical reasoning on postpartum hemorrhage scores were significantly higher in the TBL students than in the LBL students at post-test (p < .001; Cohen's d = 1.41) and 2 weeks post-test (p < .001; Cohen's d = 1.50). The CES showed a significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: TBL is an effective learning method for enhancing the clinical reasoning ability of students. This learning method allows for more independent and active learning. Having a strong background knowledge, and discussing cases comprehensively with peers can sharpen the clinical reasoning ability of students.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medical undergraduates should be prepared to recognize life threating critical conditions. Undergraduate medical curriculum development to incorporate more critical care education is an essential requirement. Problem Based Learning curriculum has a potential advantage in providing more focused critical care education to medical undergraduate. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the final year medical students' knowledge and confidence in key critical care concepts in Problem Based Learning (PBL) curriculum compared to those in Traditional (Lecture) Based Learning curriculum. We also aimed to evaluate undergraduate's level of satisfaction with the exposure to critical care education during medical education and training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional anonymous self-administered survey questionnaire completed by two groups of final-year medical students (PBL and TBL) from three Saudi medical schools to assess the degree of undergraduate exposure to critical care and their knowledge of key critical care assessment parameters. RESULTS: The responses of 279 final year medical students was analyzed (70% response rate). The majority (53%) was male and the mean age 23.9 ± 1.4 years. Only 13% of students felt confident to manage hypovolemic shock and 15% could recognize the signs of a threatened airway. One third of the students (29%) correctly identified the critical level of lactic acid in shock and less than 2% of the sample responded correctly to all the questions related to the formal assessment of critically ill patients. Lectures were the main source of information in acute care. More than two-thirds (46%) of the sample indicated that they received tuition in critical care, however the total duration spent in a critical care rotation or teaching was 1 day or less. The medical students, who completed their training with a Problem-Based Learning curriculum, had a higher knowledge base and were more confident in many critical care concepts. Only 6.5% choose critical care as their likely future career. CONCLUSION: Medical undergraduates in PBL have an overall better knowledge on key concepts and assessment tools applicable to evaluating and managing critically ill patients compared to students in TBL. However the gap in knowledge and confidence in assessing ill patients in both groups is evident. Critical care was not chosen as a preferred future career in all surveyed students. There is a need for institutional support and endorsement of undergraduate critical care exposure and education in Saudi Universities both to better prepare medical students for their imminent post-graduates exposure to ill patients and to help in closing the gap in critical care physicians through promoting the specialty.