RESUMEN

I argue that the dynamic nature of contemporary, landscape-shaping (geomorphic) processes deserves more consideration in conservation science and practice. In an analysis of a sample of fundamental terms related to geomorphology and area-based conservation in the Web of Science, I found that the terms co-occurred in <2% of the analyzed entries (titles, abstracts, and keywords) from 2000 to 2020. This result is indicative of the rather peripheral attention that, more broadly, landscape-shaping processes seem to receive in the conservation literature. Among conservation scientists and practitioners, landforms that define the physical structure of habitat are often perceived as largely static, whereas the consideration of their dynamic adjustments to geomorphic processes is often limited to extreme events. I use examples derived from river-floodplain environments to illustrate strong, multifaceted, and reciprocal interactions between biota and various erosional and depositional processes. These ubiquitous interdependencies clearly demonstrate that geomorphic processes are an integral part of ecosystem dynamics at time scales relevant for conservation. Crucially, erosional and depositional processes modulate many environmental impacts of past and current anthropogenic activities. I conclude that the absence of a more explicit and widespread consideration of geomorphic processes in conservation science and practice is surprising and detrimental to their effectiveness. I call for bolstered efforts among the conservation and geoscience communities to better integrate landscape dynamics within the field of conservation. The rise of the ecosystem-based and social-ecological systems approaches to conservation and the growth of interdisciplinary geoscience branches (e.g., biogeomorphology, ecohydraulics, and geoconservation) will facilitate such an integration.

Un caso para una mayor integración de los procesos paisajísticos físicos en las ciencias y prácticas de la conservación Resumen En este artículo sostengo que la naturaleza dinámica de los procesos paisajísticos (geomórficos) contemporáneos merecen ser mejor considerados en las ciencias y práctica de la conservación. Con el análisis de una muestra de términos fundamentales de Web of Science relacionados con la geomorfología y la conservación basada en el área, encontré que los términos tuvieron una coocurrencia en <2% de las entradas analizadas (títulos, resúmenes y palabras clave) entre el 2000 y 2020. Este resultado indica que hay una atención relativamente periférica que, en términos más generales, parece que reciben los procesos paisajísticos dentro de la literatura de la conservación. Los científicos y practicantes de la conservación con frecuencia perciben el relieve que define la estructura física del hábitat como estático, mientras que la consideración de sus ajustes dinámicos a los procesos geomórficos está casi siempre limitado a eventos extremos. En las llanuras aluviales existen interacciones fuertes, multifacéticas y recíprocas entre la biota y varios procesos de erosión y deposición. Estas interdependencias predominantes demuestran con claridad que los procesos geomórficos son una parte integral de las dinámicas ambientales en escalas de tiempo relevantes para la conservación. Es destacable que los procesos de erosión y deposición modulan muchos impactos ambientales del pasado y actividades antropogénicas actuales. Concluyo que la ausencia de una consideración más explícita y extendida de los procesos geomórficos dentro de las ciencias y práctica de la conservación es sorprendente y nociva para su efectividad. Hago un llamado para fortalecer esfuerzos dentro de las comunidades de conservación y geociencias para integrar de mejor manera las dinámicas del paisaje dentro del campo de conservación. El incremento en las estrategias basadas en ecosistemas y sistemas socio­ecológicos en la conservación y el aumento de ramas interdisciplinarias de las geociencias (p. ej.: biogeomorfología, ecohidráulica y geoconservación) facilitarán dicha integración.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Farmland landscapes are intuitive indicators of the functions of farmland ecosystems. However, geographical differences complicate the spatio-temporal evolutionary characteristics of farmland landscape systems, making them difficult to explore. This creates a series of difficulties in designing farmland management policy in China's diversified geographical environment. This study aims to explore the evolution of laws and dynamic mechanisms of farmland landscape structural changes in different geographical environments at the provincial level in China. A landscape structure classification model at the pixel level was developed using the principles of range attenuation in geographical space and ecological boundary effects to identify the spatial characteristics of the degradation processes in farmland landscapes. A redundancy analysis (RDA) investigated the human and natural causes of farmland landscape degradation processes. The results demonstrate that the farmland landscape systems in Jiangsu Province degraded between the 1980s and 2010 on a spatial gradient with human geography: the beginnings of industrialisation → rapid industrialisation → completion of industrialisation. Degradation manifested temporal and spatial differentiation as follows: fragmentation via the joint activities of invasion from non-agricultural boundaries and internal wedging → fragmentation caused by non-agricultural internal wedging → fragmentation caused by boundary invasion. The core causal factors of degradation were development intensity and the extent of construction land, which indicate changes in socioeconomic development. Industrialisation and rapid urbanisation increased the development intensity of human construction, which disrupted the connections among farmland landscapes through boundary invasions or discontinuous occupations. This subsequent fragmentation of farmland landscape patterns degraded the productive and ecological functions of farmlands. This study indicates that development intensity around agricultural environments should be strictly controlled which would be beneficial for the design of farmland conservation policies and land management in China.