RESUMEN

Carcinosarcoma or sarcomatoid carcinoma of the urinary bladder is a rare but aggressive bladder cancer characterized by malignant epithelial and mesenchymal components, with only a few cases reported in the literature so far. In this report, we discuss a case of a 74-year-old female nonsmoker who presented with intermittent hematuria and passage of clots in the last four months. Radiographic images showed an irregular mass lesion (6.2 x 6 cm) in the left lateral wall of the urinary bladder near to left vesicoureteral junction. The mass was completely removed with transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TUR-BT). Histopathological study revealed high-grade carcinosarcoma, and immunohistochemistry showed diffuse positivity for vimentin, pan-cytokeratin (CK) and CK7, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), and CK5/6. The patient declined radical cystectomy and only agreed to receive intravesical chemotherapy (gemcitabine), and she remains alive after more than four years of follow-up. Carcinosarcoma of the urinary bladder is a rare tumor primarily affecting older people, and it is most commonly treated with radical cystectomy and different combination treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation. However, tumor resection followed by intravesical chemotherapy may be an alternative option in the early stages of bladder carcinosarcoma for some patients, thereby avoiding the need for aggressive treatments, especially for elderly patients who decline to undergo radical surgery.

RESUMEN

Background: Bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is common and randomized data supports utilization of prophylactic intravesical mitomycin to reduce recurrence. Recently, gemcitabine has been shown to be safe and effective at reducing recurrence following transurethral resection of bladder tumors. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single, intraoperative gemcitabine instillation immediately following bladder cuff closure during RNU, and to compare outcomes with non-gemcitabine intravesical chemotherapy agents. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients from two high volume centers who underwent robotic-assisted RNU between 2016-2020 and received either 2 g intravesical gemcitabine immediately following bladder cuff closure or non-gemcitabine intravesical chemotherapies [40 mg mitomycin C (MMC) or 50 mg doxorubicin] at the beginning of the procedure. Clinicopathologic factors were compared between cohorts. Bladder recurrence rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: During RNU, 24 patients received gemcitabine and 31 patients received non-gemcitabine chemotherapy. In total, 35% (19/55) of patients experienced a bladder cancer recurrence. There was no significant difference in estimated bladder recurrence-free survival (bRFS) between gemcitabine and non-gemcitabine patient cohorts (P=0.64). By 12 months post-surgery, 25% of patients had experienced bladder recurrence. The estimated 1-year bladder RFS survival was 73% for gemcitabine and 76% for non-gemcitabine chemotherapy. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival did not differ between cohorts. No adverse events potentially attributable to the use of gemcitabine were noted within 30 days postoperatively. Conclusions: Gemcitabine instilled immediately following bladder cuff closure during RNU has similar bRFS rates compared to established chemotherapy agents instilled at the start of surgery.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Intravesical therapy (IVT), including Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), is the standard of care for high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Despite the use of IVT, many patients recur after treatment. The bladder microbiome and its role in disease processes has recently risen to prominence. We aim to characterize changes that occur in the bladder microbiome over the course of intravesical therapy and assess whether these changes correlate with outcomes in patients with NMIBC. Methods: Patients with NMIBC undergoing induction BCG or intravesical therapy were prospectively enrolled from January 2019 to March 2020. Patients with clinical T2 or greater pathology or active urinary tract infection at enrollment were excluded. Twenty-nine patients had catheterized (bladder) urine samples collected prior to induction intravesical therapy and prior to each IVT instillation. Twenty-seven received BCG while 2 received intravesical gemcitabine. Bacteria were identified using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Bladder microbiome changes were evaluated and differences between patients who recurred and patients who did not recur after IVT were investigated. Results: Across the 29 patients analyzed, bacterial richness decreased significantly following intravesical therapy (Richness, P=0.01). Evenness and overall diversity did not change significantly (Pielou, P=0.62; Shannon, P=0.13). Patients who experienced recurrence had a higher relative abundance of Aerococcus in their urine (P<0.01), while those who did not recur had significantly more Ureaplasma (P=0.01) and Escherichia/Shigella species (P=0.05). Patients with decreased levels of alpha diversity were more likely to fall within the non-recurrence cohort. Conclusion: IVT for NMIBC appears to change the urinary microbiome by decreasing richness while not altering evenness or overall diversity. The presence of Aerococcus species may be predictive of a poor cancer response to IVT, while the presence of Ureaplasma and Escherichia/Shigella may predict a favorable response to IVT. Further studies are warranted to elucidate and confirm the significance of changes in the bladder microbiome.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introducción Se realizó un metaanálisis para evaluar el efecto de la mitomicina intravesical en comparación con la gemcitabina en el tratamiento del cáncer de vejiga sin invasión muscular. Métodos Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica sistemática hasta noviembre de 2021 y 6 estudios incluyeron 389 sujetos con cáncer de vejiga no invasivo al músculo al inicio del estudio; 197 de ellos recibieron mitomicina intravesical y 192 gemcitabina intravesical. Se informó de las relaciones sobre el efecto de la mitomicina intravesical en comparación con la gemcitabina en el tratamiento del cáncer de vejiga no invasivo al músculo. Se calculó la odds ratio (OR) con intervalos de confianza (IC) del 95% para evaluar el efecto de la mitomicina en comparación con el de la gemcitabina intravesical en el tratamiento del cáncer de vejiga no invasivo mediante el método dicotómico con un modelo de efectos aleatorios o fijos. Resultados La mitomicina intravesical obtuvo tasas significativamente mayores de recidiva (OR: 2,41; IC 95%: 1,43-4,08; p=0,001) y de cistitis química (OR: 4,39; IC 95%: 2,27-8,51; p<0,001) en comparación con la gemcitabina intravesical en sujetos con cáncer de vejiga no invasivo. Sin embargo, la mitomicina intravesical no mostró diferencias significativas en su efecto sobre la hematuria (OR: 1,71; IC 95%: 0,68-4,33; p=0,26), reacciones cutáneas (OR, 2,04; IC 95%: 0,59-7,07; p=0,26) y daños en la función hepática y renal (OR, 1,96; IC 95%; 0,35-10,96; p=0,44) en comparación con la gemcitabina intravesical en sujetos con cáncer de vejiga no invasivo al músculo. Conclusiones La mitomicina intravesical tuvo tasas de recidiva y cistitis química significativamente mayores y no hubo diferencias significativas en su efecto sobre la hematuria, la reacción cutánea y el daño de la función hepática y renal en comparación con la gemcitabina intravesical en sujetos con cáncer de vejiga no invasivo al músculo. Se necesitan más estudios para validar estos resultados (AU)

Introduction We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of intravesical mitomycin compared with gemcitabine on the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Methods A systematic literature search up to November 2021 was done and 6 studies included 389 subjects with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer at the start of the study; 197 of them were provided with intravesical-mitomycin and 192 with intravesical gemcitabine. The studies reported the relationships about the effect of intravesical mitomycin compared with gemcitabine on the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the effect of intravesical mitomycin compared with gemcitabine on the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Results Intravesical mitomycin had significantly higher recurrence rates (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.43-4.08, P=.001) and chemical cystitis (OR, 4.39; 95% CI, 2.27-8.51, P<.001) compared to intravesical gemcitabine in subjects with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. However, intravesical mitomycin had no significant difference in its effect on hematuria (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, .68-4.33, P=.26), skin reaction (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, .59-7.07, P=.26), and liver and kidney functions damage (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.35-10.96, P=.44) compared to intravesical gemcitabine in subjects with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Conclusions Intravesical mitomycin had significantly higher recurrence rates and chemical cystitis and no significant difference in its effect on hematuria, skin reaction, and liver and kidney functions damage compared to intravesical gemcitabine in subjects with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Further studies are required to validate these findings (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of intravesical mitomycin compared with gemcitabine on the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. METHODS: A systematic literature search up to November 2021 was done and 6 studies included 389 subjects with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer at the start of the study; 197 of them were provided with intravesical-mitomycin and 192 with intravesical gemcitabine. The studies reported the relationships about the effect of intravesical mitomycin compared with gemcitabine on the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the effect of intravesical mitomycin compared with gemcitabine on the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. RESULTS: Intravesical mitomycin had significantly higher recurrence rates (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.43-4.08, p=0.001) and chemical cystitis (OR, 4.39; 95% CI, 2.27-8.51, p<0.001) compared to intravesical gemcitabine in subjects with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. However, intravesical mitomycin had no significant difference in its effect on hematuria (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 0.68-4.33, p=0.26), skin reaction (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.59-7.07, p=0.26), and liver and kidney functions damage (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.35-10.96, p=0.44) compared to intravesical gemcitabine in subjects with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical mitomycin had significantly higher recurrence rates and chemical cystitis and no significant difference in its effect on hematuria, skin reaction, and liver and kidney functions damage compared to intravesical gemcitabine in subjects with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

Asunto(s)