RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Prevention of fractures is an unmet need in glucocorticoid (GC)-treated Duchenne muscular dystrophy. This study explored factors associated with incident vertebral fractures (VFs) to inform future fracture prevention efforts. METHODS: VFs were evaluated prospectively at study baseline and 12 months on lateral spine radiographs in participants aged 4 to 25 years with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clinical factors were analyzed for their association with the change in Spinal Deformity Index (sum of the Genant-defined VF grades from T4 to L4) between baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-eight males were evaluated (mean ± SD age at baseline 11.0 ± 3.6 years; mean ± SD GC duration at baseline 4.1 ± 3.1 years; 74% ambulatory). Nine of 38 participants (24%) had 17 incident VFs, of which 3/17 VFs (18%) were moderate/severe. Participants with 12-month incident VF had lower mean ± SD baseline lumbar spine areal bone mineral density Z-scores (-2.9 ± 1.0 vs -1.9 ± 1.1; P = .049) and lower total body less head areal bone mineral density Z-scores (-3.1 ± 1.2 vs -1.6 ± 1.7; P = .036). Multivariable linear regression showed that at least 1 VF at baseline (P < .001), a higher number of antecedent non-VF (P < .001), and greater bone age delay at baseline (P = .027) were significant predictors of an increase in the Spinal Deformity Index from baseline to 12 months. CONCLUSION: The observation that ≥ 1 prevalent VF and/or non-VF were the strongest predictors of incident VFs at 12 months supports the need for prevention of first fractures in this high-risk setting. Bone age delay, a marker of GC exposure, may assist in the prioritization of patients in efforts to prevent first fractures.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Masculino , Humanos , Densidad Ósea , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/complicaciones , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/tratamiento farmacológico , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Fracturas Óseas/inducido químicamente , Factores de Riesgo , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Esteroides , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiologíaRESUMEN
This study aims to investigate the influence of overweight/obesity and change in weight or body mass index (BMI) on incident fractures among Chinese postmenopausal women. According to BMI, 754 postmenopausal women were categorized into normal weight (NW), overweight (OW), and obesity (OB) groups, respectively. We used data from the baseline and the second survey for statistical analysis, including anthropometric data, clinical fractures, and morphometric vertebral fractures (MVFs) assessed by X-rays. The prevalence of previous MVFs was 32.7% and 21.8% in the OB and NW groups, respectively (p < 0.05). All incident fractures and incident MVFs accounted for 10.7 and 6.3% among all participants within five years. Overweight/obesity and increase in weight or BMI during the follow-up had no associations with all incident fractures, incident MVFs, and incident clinical non-VFs among all participants. However, after multivariate adjustment, the increased BMI at baseline was the risk factor of incident MVFs in the OW group (odds ratio, OR 2.06, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.16-3.66, p = 0.014), and increase in weight (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-0.99, p = 0.036) or BMI (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.59-0.99, p = 0.045) during the follow-up were the protective factors of all incident fractures in the NW group. Overweight/obesity and change in weight or BMI do not correlate with fracture risk in postmenopausal women, but an increase in weight is the protective factor against incident fractures in normal-weight participants. Overweight postmenopausal women with a higher BMI should pay attention to the risk of MVFs.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Femenino , Humanos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Posmenopausia , Beijing , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Objective: To compare whether falls risk score and incident fracture over 10.7 years were different among three previously identified pain phenotypes. Methods: Data on 915 participants (mean age 63 years) from a population-based cohort study were studied at baseline and follow-ups at 2.6, 5.1 and 10.7 years. Three pain phenotypes were previously identified using the latent class analysis: Class 1: high prevalence of emotional problems and low prevalence of structural damage; Class 2: high prevalence of structural damage and low prevalence of emotional problems; Class 3: low prevalence of emotional problems and low prevalence of structural damage. Fractures were self-reported and falls risk score was measured using the Physiological Profile Assessment. Generalized estimating equations model and linear mixed-effects model were used to compare differences in incident fractures and falls risk score over 10.7 years between pain phenotypes, respectively. Results: There were 3 new hip, 19 vertebral, and 121 non-vertebral fractures, and 138 any site fractures during 10.7-year follow-up. Compared with Class 3, Class 1 had a higher risk of vertebral (relative risk (RR) = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.22-4.91), non-vertebral fractures (RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42), and any site fractures (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.04-1.46) after controlling for covariates, bone mineral density and falls risk score. Class 2 had a higher risk of non-vertebral and any site fracture relative to those in Class 3 (non-vertebral: RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.17-1.71; any site: RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.20-1.73), but not vertebral fracture. Compared with Class 3, Class 1 had a higher falls risk score at baseline (ß = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.09-0.23) and over 10.7-year (ß = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.04). Conclusions: Class 1 and/or Class 2 had a higher risk of incident fractures and falls risk score than Class 3, highlighting that targeted preventive strategies for fractures and falls are needed in pain population.
RESUMEN
Purpose: In this descriptive study, we examined the incidence of fractures in patients with newly treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) compared to matched reference population. Methods: Participants from the UK Clinical Practice research datalink (CPRD) GOLD (1987-2017), aged ≥30 years, with a T2D diagnosis code and a first prescription for a non-insulin anti-diabetic drug (n = 124,328) were included. Cases with T2D were matched by year of birth, sex and practice to a reference population (n = 124,328), the mean follow-up was 7.7 years. Crude fracture incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated. Analyses were stratified by fracture site and sex and additionally adjusted for BMI, smoking status, alcohol use and history of any fracture at index date. Results: The IR of all fractures and major osteoporotic fractures was lower in T2D compared to the reference population (IRR 0.97; 95%CI 0.94-0.99). The IRs were lower for clavicle (IRR 0.67; 0.56-0.80), radius/ulna (IRR 0.81; 0.75-0.86) and vertebral fractures (0.83; 0.75-0.92) and higher for ankle (IRR 1.16; 95%CI 1.06-1.28), foot (1.11; 1.01-1.22), tibia/fibula (1.17; 1.03-1.32) and humerus fractures (1.11; 1.03-1.20). Differences in IRs at various fracture sites between T2D and the reference population were more pronounced in women than in men. In contrast, BMI adjusted IRs for all fractures (IRR 1.07; 1.04-1.10) and most individual fracture sites were significantly higher in T2D, especially in women. Conclusion: The crude incidence of all fractures was marginally lower in patients with newly treated T2D compared to the matched reference population but differed according to fracture site, especially in women. BMI adjusted analyses resulted in higher incidence rates in T2D at almost all fracture sites compared to crude incidence rates and this was more pronounced in women than in men. This implies that BMI may have a protective impact on the crude incidence of fractures, especially in women with newly treated T2D.
RESUMEN
Higher incidences of fractures are seen in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D), but knowledge on different fracture sites is sparse. We found a higher incidence mainly for distal fracture sites in people with T1D compared to controls. It must be further studied which fractures attributed to the higher incidence rates (IRs) at specific sites. INTRODUCTION: People with T1D have a higher incidence of fractures compared to the general population. However, sparse knowledge exists on the incidence rates of individual fracture sites. Therefore, we examined the incidence of various fracture sites in people with newly treated T1D compared to matched controls. METHODS: All people from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD (1987-2017), of all ages with a T1D diagnosis code (n = 6381), were included. People with T1D were matched by year of birth, sex, and practice to controls (n = 6381). Fracture IRs and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated. Analyses were stratified by fracture site and sex. RESULTS: The IR of all fractures was significantly higher in people with T1D compared to controls (IRR: 1.39 (CI95%: 1.24-1.55)). Compared to controls, the IRR for people with T1D was higher for several fracture sites including carpal (IRR: 1.41 (CI95%: 1.14-1.75)), clavicle (IRR: 2.10 (CI95%: 1.18-3.74)), foot (IRR: 1.70 (CI95%: 1.23-2.36)), humerus (IRR: 1.46 (CI95%: 1.04-2.05)), and tibia/fibula (IRR: 1.67 CI95%: 1.08-2.59)). In women with T1D, higher IRs were seen at the ankle (IRR: 2.25 (CI95%: 1.10-4.56)) and foot (IRR: 2.11 (CI95%: 1.27-3.50)), whereas in men with T1D, higher IRs were seen for carpal (IRR: 1.45 (CI95%: 1.14-1.86)), clavicle (IRR: 2.13 (CI95%: 1.13-4.02)), and humerus (IRR: 1.77 (CI95%: 1.10-2.83)) fractures. CONCLUSION: The incidence of carpal, clavicle, foot, humerus, and tibia/fibula fractures was higher in newly treated T1D, but there was no difference at other fracture sites compared to controls. Therefore, the higher incidence of fractures in newly treated people with T1D has been found mainly for distal fracture sites.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Fracturas Óseas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Humanos , Húmero , Incidencia , Masculino , Articulación de la MuñecaRESUMEN
In this study, we report the epidemiology and risk factors for humeral fractures (proximal humerus and shaft) among men and women residing in south-eastern Australia. Incident fractures during 2006 and 2007 were identified using X-ray reports (Geelong Osteoporosis Study Fracture Grid). Risk factors were identified using data from case-control studies conducted as part of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Median age of fracture was lower in males than females for proximal humerus (33.0 vs 71.2 years), but not for humeral shaft (8.9 vs 8.5 years). For females, proximal humerus fractures occurred mainly in the 70-79 and 80+ years age groups, whereas humeral shaft fractures followed a U-shaped pattern. Males showed a U-shaped pattern for both proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures. Overall age-standardised incidence rates for proximal humerus fractures in males and females were 40.6 (95% CI 32.7, 48.5) and 73.2 (95% CI 62.2, 84.1) per 100,000 person years, respectively. For humeral shaft fractures, the age-standardised rate was 69.3 (95% CI 59.0, 79.6) for males and 61.5 (95% CI 51.9, 71.0) for females. There was an increase in risk of proximal humerus fractures in men with a lower femoral neck BMD, younger age, prior fracture and higher milk consumption. In pre-menopausal women, increased height and falls were both risk factors for proximal humerus fractures. For post-menopausal women, risk factors associated with proximal humerus fractures included a lower non-milk dairy consumption and sustaining a prior fracture. Humeral shaft fractures in both sexes were sustained mainly in childhood, while proximal humerus fractures were sustained in older adulthood. The overall age-standardised rates of proximal humerus fractures were nearly twice as high in females compared to males, whereas the incidence rates of humeral shaft fractures were similar.