RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the long-term clinical, technical, biological, and esthetic outcomes of implant supported single zirconia crowns (ISCs) intraorally cemented to Ti-base hybrid-abutments up to 16 years after placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 63 ISCs (Xive S, Camlog Screw Line, Replace Select TC NP, Branemark MK II, and 3i Osseotite) were evaluated in 36 patients at two different centers. Original Ti-bases were selected and zirconia meso structures and zirconia crowns were designed using CAD/CAM software and then milled from partially stabilized zirconia blocks. After the meso structures were cemented extraorally onto the Ti-bases, the ceramic crowns were intraorally luted to the hybrid abutments. The Ti-base ISC restorations were followed up for up to 16 years, and their clinical, biological, and esthetic outcomes were recorded at distinct time points (T1; T2) at three-year intervals. RESULTS: 36 patients (18 men, 18 women) received 32 ISCs in the anterior region and 31 in the posterior region of the maxilla and mandible. The mean follow-up of the Ti-base ISCs was 6.93 ± 2.60 years. The mean follow-up of the implants amounted to 8.11 ± 3.26 years. No implants were lost during follow-up, resulting in a cumulative implant survival rate of 100%. Abutment screw loosening was observed in two ISCs after one year in service. The overall cumulative restorative survival rate of the Ti-base restorations reached thus 96.83%. At T2 follow-up 24% of the ISCs exhibited an increase in PD despite maintaining clinically healthy peri-implant tissue. An 11% increase in BOP and a 3.17% decrease in PI were recorded. Despite spectrophotometrically measured ΔE values indicating visible discoloration of some restorations and their peri-implant soft tissue, a low incidence of esthetic complications was observed with an average PES/WES score of ≥ 12. No correlation was found between PES (R = -0.25; p = 0.27) and WES (R = -0.18; p = 0.43) scores and digital shade determination. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present retrospective, multicenter, cohort study indicate satisfactory clinical outcomes for intraorally cemented single zirconia crowns (ISCs) supported by Ti-base hybrid abutments. An overall esthetic superiority of Ti-base ISCs could not be confirmed.

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Implant-supported single crowns have become a routine approach for the replacement of missing single teeth, being considered as one of the most common ways of rehabilitation when adjacent teeth are healthy. The present retrospective study aimed to investigate the risk factors possibly associated with failure and technical complications of implant-supported single crowns and their supporting implants. Materials and Methods: Patients treated at one faculty (2009-2019) were considered for inclusion. Complications investigated included ceramic fracture/chipping, crown loss of retention/mobility, crown failure/fracture, loosening/loss/fracture of prosthetic screw, and implant failure/fracture. Any condition/situation that led to the removal/replacement of crowns (implant failure not included) was considered prosthesis failure. Univariate/multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate the associations between clinical covariates and failure. Results: 278 patients (358 crowns) were included. Mean ± SD follow-up was 56.5 ± 29.7 months. Seven implants (after a mean of 76.5 ± 43.7 months) and twenty crowns (21.3 ± 23.5 months) failed. The cumulative survival rate (CSR) for crowns was 93.5% after 5, remaining at 92.2% between 6 and 11 years. The most common reasons for crown failure were porcelain large fracture (n = 6), crown repeatedly loose (n = 6), and porcelain chipping (n = 5). Men and probable bruxism were identified in the Cox regression model as being associated with crown failure. The most common observed technical complications were mobility of the crown and chipping of the ceramic material, with the latter being observed even in crowns manufactured of monolithic zirconia. Cases with at least one technical complication (not considering loss of screw hole sealing) were more common among probable bruxers than in non-bruxers (p = 0.002). Cases of ceramic chipping were more common among bruxers than in non-bruxers (p = 0.014, log-rank test). Conclusions: Probable bruxism and patient's sex (men) were factors associated with a higher risk of failure of implant-supported single crowns.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Precise occlusal design of implant-supported fixed prostheses is difficult to achieve by the conventional wax-up method, often requiring chairside adjustments. The computer-aided design (CAD) method is promising. This study aims to compare the occlusal contacts and clearance of posterior implant-supported single crowns designed by the CAD and conventional methods. METHODS: Sample size calculation indicated fourteen samples per group. Two sets of type-IV plaster casts with a single implant analog inserted in the posterior teeth region were mounted as master casts in a mechanical articulator in maximal intercuspal position (MIP). Seven working cast sets were obtained from each master cast by a closed tray technique, and mounted in MIP. Two implant-supported single crowns were designed with an occlusal clearance to achieve light occlusal contact in each working cast set by CAD and conventional method, separately. For the CAD group, the crown was designed in digital models obtained by scanning the working casts. For the conventional group, wax-up of the crown was prepared on the working casts and scanned to generate a STL file. In the working and master casts, mean and minimum occlusal clearances in the designed occlusal contact area of the both finished prostheses were calculated using the occlusal clearance (OC) and occlusal record (OR) method. The prostheses' occlusion was evaluated in master casts. RESULTS: For the evaluation in the working casts, both design methods had similar mean occlusal clearances by the OC method (195.4 ± 43.8 vs. 179.8 ± 41.8 µm; P = 0.300), while CAD group resulted in a significantly larger minimum occlusal clearance in the designed occlusal contact area (139.5 ± 52.3 vs. 99.8 ± 43.8 µm; P = 0.043). Both design methods had similar mean and minimum occlusal clearances by the OR method (P > 0.05). For the evaluation in the master casts, both design techniques had similar mean and minimum occlusal clearances, number and distribution of occlusal contacts, and lateral interference ratios (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Occlusal contact and clearance of posterior implant-supported single crowns designed by the CAD method can be at least as good as those designed by the conventional wax-up method.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In cases of severely compromised teeth, dental practitioners are confronted with the therapeutic decision of whether to restore a tooth or replace it with an implant. Comparative scientific evidence on patient perception of both treatment approaches is scarce. The subject of this prospective clinical study was to compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) between two treatment groups: restoration of severely destroyed teeth after orthodontic extrusion (FOE) versus tooth extraction and implant-supported single crown restoration (ISC). A self-selected trial was performed with 21 patients per group. OHRQoL was assessed with the aid of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G49) at different time intervals: before treatment (T1), after treatment (T2), after restoration (T3) and at recall (T4). Overall, OHIP scores improved from baseline to follow-up for both concepts with no significant differences between groups. There were no significant differences in subscales between FOE and ISC at T1, T3 and T4. In terms of functional limitations (p = 0.003) and physical disability (p = 0.021), patients in the FOE group temporarily exhibited lower OHRQoL at T2 in comparison to the ISC group. However, at baseline, after final restoration and at recall, the study demonstrates the same level of OHRQoL for both treatment concepts.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose was to investigate stress distribution among 4 different customized abutment types: titanium abutment (Ti), titanium hybrid-abutment-crown (Ti-Hybrid), zirconia abutment with titanium base (Zir-TiBase), and zirconia hybrid-abutment-crown with titanium base (Zir-Hybrid-TiBase). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To achieve this purpose, 4 types of abutment configurations were simulated. A static load of 200 N (vertical) and 100 N (oblique) were applied to the models. The volume average, maximum, and stress distribution of von Mises stress, including percentage difference, were analyzed with 3D finite element analysis. RESULTS: According to the volume average von Mises stress, the Ti and Zir-TiBase comparison group showed that the Zir-TiBase group dominantly generated the higher value at Ti-base (22.57 MPa) and screw (17.68 MPa). To evaluate the effect of the hybrid-abutment-crown on volume average von Mises stress by comparing the Ti-Hybrid and Zir-Hybrid-TiBase groups, it was revealed that the combination of abutment and crown in the Ti-Hybrid group generated the worst stress concentration at the screw (12.42 MPa), while in the Zir-Hybrid-TiBase group presented stress concentration at the implant (8.90 MPa). CONCLUSIONS: A titanium base improved stress distribution at implant in zirconia abutment with titanium base by absorbing stress itself. Customized titanium hybrid-abutment-crown and zirconia hybrid-abutment-crown with titanium base created concentrated stress at screw and implant; respectively. Both abutment types should be cautiously used and maintenanced regularly.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Some authors have recommended that implant-supported single crowns should only contact during heavy clenching. However, a lack of occlusal contact with moderate clenching may cause supraeruption of antagonist natural teeth. The main objective of this study was to assess changes in the occlusal contacts of posterior implant-supported single crowns with natural antagonist teeth 2 years after placement. The occlusal schemes of 14 patients who received 16 implant-supported single crowns in molar and premolar regions were assessed in this prospective study. Just after crown placement, at 6 months and after 2 years, a silicone maxillomandibular relationship and T-scan records were obtained during the intercuspal position with light and heavy clenching, determined using near half of the maximum force and maximum force, respectively. Occlusal contacts were assessed quantitatively and qualitatively in the implant-supported single crowns, contralateral tooth, and adjacent tooth; the latter 2 were used as controls. After 6 months and 2 years, no significant variations were observed in any region of the occlusal scheme in any assessments, including silicone record or T-Scan, using light or heavy clenching, and qualitative or quantitative occlusal contact assessment. In this preliminary study, the occlusal scheme did not vary at the intercuspal position 2 years after placing posterior implant-supported single crowns.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively assess the clinical outcomes of implant-supported single crowns and the supporting implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients treated with implant-supported single crowns at one specialist clinic. Implant and prosthesis failure, and mechanical/technical complications (ceramic fracture/chipping; crown loss of retention/mobility; crown failure/fracture; loosening/loss/fracture of prosthetic screw; and implant failure/fracture) were the outcomes analyzed. Any condition/situation that led to the removal/replacement of crowns was considered prosthesis failure. RESULTS: A total of 438 patients with 567 crowns were included. Mean ± SD follow-up of 183.4 ± 69.3 months. A total of 37 implants (6.5%) and 54 crowns (9.5%) failed. If only technical problems were considered, the crown failure rate decreased to 4.1% (23/567). Most common reasons for crown failure: esthetic issue (n = 12), crown constantly mobile (n = 9), change to another type of prosthesis together with other implants (n = 8), crown fracture (n = 7), and crown in infraposition in comparison with adjacent teeth (n = 7). The odds of crown failure were shown to be statistically significantly higher for the following factors: younger patients, maxillary crowns, and screw-retained crowns. Loose prosthetic screw was much more prevalent in screw-retained than in cemented crowns. Ceramic fracture/chipping was more prevalent in screw-retained crowns, maxillae, females. Crown fracture was more prevalent in ceramic crowns, screw-retained crowns, maxillae, posterior region, females. However, these differences were statistically significant only for crown fractures in females. CONCLUSIONS: The odds of crown failure were significant for some factors, but one must keep in mind that non-technical complications are as common as technical ones as reasons for the replacement of implant-supported single crowns.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective:To evaluate the effect of the occlusal surface height of a mandibular posterior implant-supported single crown on stress in bone tissues.Methods:Three-dimensional finite element models of the implant-supported single crown replacing the missing right lower second premolar,mesial and distal natural teeth,periodontal membrane,alveolar bone,loaded rigid body and analog food of almond were established.Using the Federation Dentaire International (FDI)system,the first premolar, the second premolar and the first molar were represented with 44,45,46.Three occlusal surface heights of the crown were studied:(1 )normal height;(2)1 5 μm reduction in height;(3)30 μm reduction in height.The models were loaded by independent loading with maximal occlusal force(44 by 280 N,45 by 360 N,and 46 by 480 N)and average occlusal force(44 by 1 40 N,45 by 1 80 N,and 46 by 240 N)on the single crown;combined loading (maximal occlusal force transformed into uniform load of 3 .7 MPa on top of rigid body,in contact with points on the occlusal surface),and analog almond-like food loading (average occlusal force transformed into uniform load of 1 .67 MPa in simulated food chewing,in contact with points on the occlusal surface).Results:For maximal biting force under independent loading,Von Mises stress peak values in bone tissues around 44,45,and 46 were 82.57 MPa,45.26 MPa and 27.79 MPa;For average biting force,peak values were 41 .28 MPa,22.63 MPa and 1 3.89 MPa.Under com-bined loading,compared with the normal occlusal surface height group,Von Mises stress peak values de-creased 4.6 MPa,by 0.84%;increased 7.52 MPa,by 20.04%,and decreased 1 .8 MPa,by 5.84%, for 45,46,and 44 in the 30 μm infra-occlusion group,respectively.Under food loading,Von Mises stress peak values decreased 0.34 MPa,by 1 .62%;increased 1 .1 1 MPa,by 2.66%;and increased 0.06 MPa,by 0.54%,and for 45,46,and 44 in the 30 μm infra-occlusion group,respectively.Con-clusion:Within the limitation of this study,within 30 μm reduction of the occlusal surface height of im-plant-supported single crown,no significant difference of the peak values was observed.