RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Direct comparisons between [18F]FDG PET/CT findings and clinical occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) based on independent assessments of clinical and imaging features in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are missing. Our aim was to estimate sites, frequency, and timing of immune-related PET findings during ICIs treatment in patients with melanoma and NSCLC, and to assess their correlation with clinical irAEs. Prognostic implications of immune-related events were also investigated. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with melanoma (47%) or NSCLC (53%) undergoing multiple PET examinations during anti-PD1/PDL1 treatment were retrospectively included. Clinical irAEs were graded according to CTCAE v.5.0. Abnormal PET findings suggestive of immune activation were described by two readers blinded to the clinical data. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method in patients stratified according to the presence of irAEs, immune-related PET findings or both. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients showed clinical irAEs only (n = 6), immune-related PET findings only (n = 6), or both (n = 9). In patients whose imaging findings corresponded to clinical irAEs (n = 7), a positive correlation between SUVmax and the severity of the clinical event was observed (rs=0.763, p = 0.046). Clinical irAEs occurred more frequently in patients without macroscopic disease than in metastatic patients (55% vs. 23%, p = 0.039). Patients who developed clinical irAEs had a significantly longer PFS than patients who remained clinically asymptomatic, both in the overall cohort (p = 0.011) and in the subgroup of (n = 35) patients with metastatic disease (p = 0.019). The occurrence of immune-related PET findings significantly stratified PFS in the overall cohort (p = 0.040), and slightly missed statistical significance in patients with metastatic disease (p = 0.08). The best stratification of PFS was achieved when all patients who developed immune-related events, either clinically relevant or detected by PET only, were grouped together both in the overall cohort (p = 0.002) and in patients with metastatic disease (p = 0.004). In the whole sample, OS was longer in patients who developed any immune-related events (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Patients with melanoma or NSCLC under ICI treatment can develop clinical irAEs, immune-related PET findings, or both. The occurrence of immune-related events has a prognostic impact. Combining clinical information with PET assessment improved outcome stratification.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Melanoma , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radiofármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pronóstico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/inmunología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/inmunología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Adulto , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) impact outcomes, with most research focusing on early prediction (baseline data), rather than near-term prediction (one cycle before the occurrence of irAEs and the current cycle). We aimed to explore the near-term predictive value of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), absolute eosinophil count (AEC) for severe irAEs induced by PD-1 inhibitors. Data were collected from tumor patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. NLR, PLR, and AEC data were obtained from both the previous and the current cycles of irAEs occurrence. A predictive model was developed using elastic net logistic regression Cutoff values were determined using Youden's Index. The predicted results were compared with actual data using Bayesian survival analysis. A total of 138 patients were included, of whom 47 experienced grade 1-2 irAEs and 18 experienced grade 3-5 irAEs. The predictive model identified optimal α and λ through 10-fold cross-validation. The Shapiro-Wilk test, Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression showed that only current cycle data were meaningful. The NLR was statistically significant in predicting irAEs in the previous cycle. Both NLR and AEC were significant predictors of irAEs in the current cycle. The model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.783, with a sensitivity of 77.8% and a specificity of 80.8%. A probability ≥ 0.1345 predicted severe irAEs. The model comprising NLR, AEC, and sex may predict the irAEs classification in the current cycle, offering a near-term predictive advantage over baseline models and potentially extending the duration of immunotherapy for patients.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias , Neutrófilos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/inmunología , Anciano , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Adulto , Linfocitos/inmunología , Eosinófilos/inmunología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Teorema de Bayes , Plaquetas/efectos de los fármacos , Plaquetas/inmunologíaRESUMEN
The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for various malignancies by harnessing the body's immune system to target cancer cells. However, their widespread use has unveiled a spectrum of immune-related adverse events, highlighting a critical balance between antitumor immunity and autoimmunity. This review article delves into the molecular immunology of ICIs, mapping the journey from their therapeutic action to the unintended induction of immune-related adverse events. We provide a comprehensive overview of all available ICIs, including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, programmed cell death protein 1, programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors, and emerging targets, discussing their mechanisms of action, clinical applications, and the molecular underpinnings of associated immune-related adverse events. Special attention is given to the activation of autoreactive T cells, B cells, cytokine release, and the inflammatory cascade, which together contribute to the development of immune-related adverse events. Through a molecular lens, we explore the clinical manifestations of immune-related adverse events across organ systems, offering insights into diagnosis, management, and strategies to mitigate these adverse effects. The review underscores the importance of understanding the delicate interplay between enhancing antitumor responses and minimizing immune-related adverse events, aiming to guide future research and the development of next-generation ICIs with improved drug safety profiles.
RESUMEN
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the landscape of cancer therapy. Over the last decade, both their primary focus in trials and clinical application have exponentially risen, with repeated demonstrations of their efficacy in improving survival in various cancer types. The adverse effects of these drugs on various organ systems were recognised in early phase studies. Given their relatively new emergence on the market, there has been increasing interest into short- and long-term effects and management of ICIs in real-world settings. ICI-related hepatobiliary toxicities are often challenging to diagnose and difficult to distinguish from other causes of deranged liver biochemical tests. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date and detailed exploration of the hepatobiliary complications of ICIs, including pathogenesis and approaches to diagnosis and management.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cholangitis is an uncommon and severe adverse reaction of nivolumab with unclear clinical features. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological features, imaging, and treatment of nivolumab-induced cholangitis. METHODS: Case reports, case series, and clinical studies of nivolumab-induced cholangitis were retrospectively analyzed by searching Chinese and English databases from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2023. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients entered the study. The median number of cycles of cholangitis onset was seven cycles after administration (range 1, 28) and the median time was 11 days (range 78, 390). Abdominal pain (42.1%) and fever (18.4%) were the most important initial symptoms. Some patients (15.8%) showed elevated liver enzymes without any clinical symptoms. The median alkaline phosphatase level was 1721 IU/L (range 126, 9118), and the median γ-glutamyltranspeptidase level was 829 IU/L (range 104, 3442). Anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-mitochondrial antibodies, and IgG4 typically show negative results. Imaging shows extrahepatic bile duct and intrahepatic bile duct dilation, hypertrophy, and stenosis. Liver biopsy and biliary tract biopsy mainly found CD8 inflammatory cell infiltration. Systemic steroids (84.2%) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (34.2%) were administered, and 24 patients (63.2%) had poor to moderate response to steroids. Thirty-one patients (81.6%) improved and seven patients (18.4%) did not improve. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians must remain vigilant for patients experiencing cholestasis while on nivolumab and should assess for cholangitis and carry out appropriate imaging tests. Considering the excellent efficacy of UCDA in cholangitis, steroids combined with UDCA may be a viable treatment option in cases where steroids are ineffective for cholangitis.
RESUMEN
Immune-mediated sinusitis is poorly described and may easily go undiagnosed. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, national study focusing on symptomatic immune-mediated sinusitis in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for melanoma treatment. Twelve patients were included (50% women, median age 58 years). Overall, the paraclinical assessment, the inefficacy of antibiotic/antihistaminic treatment, the improvement of symptoms on immunosuppressants and/or after ICI discontinuation, and the presence of multiple concomitant immune-related adverse-events, suggested a noninfectious etiology. Recognizing this toxicity is imperative for limitation of diagnostic wandering and appropriate treatment. However, additional epidemiological studies are needed to assess its prevalence as a potential immune-related adverse-event, and its prognostic value in patients treated with ICIs.
Immunotherapy is a type of cancer treatment that enhances the immune system's natural ability to target cancer cells. This immune response can sometimes become overstimulated or misdirected, causing side effects, known as immune-related adverse-events (IrAEs). IrAEs involving the nasal sinuses are rarely reported and often overlooked by medical oncologists. Herein, we report a series of twelve patients presenting a symptomatic sinusitis, occurring during immunotherapy for advanced melanoma. Our study shows that sinusitis, is an often-overlooked IrAE, that can become invalidating for patients, and even impair immunotherapy continuation. Therefore, recognizing this toxicity is crucial for appropriate patient care.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although the patient survival rate for many malignancies has been improved with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), some patients experience various immune-related adverse events (irAEs). IrAEs impact several organ systems, including the kidney. With anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy (pembrolizumab), kidney-related adverse events occur relatively rarely compared with other irAEs. However, the occurrence of AKI usually leads to anti-PD-1 therapy interruption or discontinuation. Therefore, there is an urgent need to clarify the mechanisms of renal irAEs (R-irAEs) to facilitate early management. This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in R-irAEs. METHODS: PBMCs were collected from three patients who developed R-irAEs after anti-PD-1 therapy and three patients who did not. The PBMCs were subjected to scRNA-seq to identify cell clusters and differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses were performed to investigate the most active biological processes in immune cells. RESULTS: Fifteen cell clusters were identified across the two groups. FOS, RPS26, and JUN were the top three upregulated genes in CD4+ T cells. The DEGs in CD4+ T cells were enriched in Th17 differentiation, Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation, NF-kappa B, Nod-like receptor, TNF, IL-17, apoptosis, and NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity signaling pathways. RPS26, TRBV25-1, and JUN were the top three upregulated genes in CD8+ T cells. The DEGs in CD8+ T cells were enriched in Th17 cell differentiation, antigen processing and presentation, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, the intestinal immune network for IgA production, the T-cell receptor signalling pathway, Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation, the phagosome, and cell adhesion molecules. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, R-irAEs are associated with immune cell dysfunction. DEGs and their enriched pathways identified in CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells play important roles in the development of renal irAEs related to anti-PD-1 therapy. These findings offer fresh perspectives on the pathogenesis of renal damage caused by anti-PD-1 therapy.
Asunto(s)
Leucocitos Mononucleares , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Análisis de la Célula Individual , Humanos , Leucocitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Masculino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Femenino , Anciano , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1 , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Análisis de Secuencia de ARN , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment by targeting immune checkpoints such as PD-1, PDL-1, and CTLA-4, but concerns about severe immune-related adverse events persist. The scarcity of literature on dermatologic implications, especially severe reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), highlights the urgent need for investigation. OBJECTIVE: Our systematic review aims to address the gap in relevant literature by extensively examining the epidemiologic risk factors and management of SJS/TEN-like illnesses in ICI-treated patients to provide insights for risk assessment and clinical care. METHODS: We identified 158 case reports that detailed the incidence of SJS/TEN in patients being treated with ICIs, examining demographic patterns, type of malignancy, clinical characteristics, and treatments linked to onset. We assessed mortality rates, risk elements, and the effectiveness of interventions to help guide clinical care. RESULTS: Analysis of 158 case reports revealed that SJS/TEN in ICI users is typically seen on average at the age of 63 and is more common in males. PD1 inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab are often associated with various mucocutaneous patterns and significant risks with ICI use, especially TEN, which is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates. LIMITATIONS: Our study notes limitations due to the inclusion of case reports or case series, such as potential publication and reporting biases, leading to skewed findings. Additionally, because of the heterogeneous reporting standards, the retrospective nature limits phenotypic precision, control for confounding variables, and data completeness. CONCLUSION: Our study provides valuable insights into the epidemiology, clinical features, management strategies, and outcomes of ICI-induced SJS/TEN, underscoring the importance of vigilant monitoring and personalized risk assessment in oncology practice. Continued research efforts are essential to optimize patient outcomes and enhance the safety profile of ICIs in cancer therapy.
RESUMEN
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) activate T cells, causing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Skin manifestations are common among irAEs, but ICI-associated bullous pemphigoid (BP) is rare. Inhibiting programmed death (PD)-1 signaling, in addition to causing epitope spreading, may disrupt B and T cell balance, causing excessive autoantibody production against the skin's basement membrane, leading to BP. A 70-year-old woman developed late-onset multi-organ irAEs, including diarrhea, thyroid dysfunction, and BP, while receiving pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor. This highlights the long-term risk of irAEs, which can occur 2-3 years after starting ICIs. In cases of multi-organ irAE, C-reactive protein levels and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio are often low. These characteristics were observed in our case. Few papers address multiple organ involvement, highlighting the need to consider irAEs in a multi-organ context. While it is known that drug-induced skin reactions worsen as blood eosinophil counts increase, in our case, the eosinophil count remained normal, suggesting that ICI-associated BP might have been controlled without discontinuing the ICI and through tapering of low-dose oral prednisone treatment. Additionally, in this case, significant CD4-positive T cell infiltration was observed in the immunostaining examination of the blisters, indicating that severe CD4-positive T cell infiltration induced by the ICI might have led to multi-organ involvement, including severe diarrhea. Few reports focus on blood eosinophil counts in BP cases or discuss CD4 and CD8 immunostaining in BP cases. Therefore, future research should explore the relationship between blood eosinophil counts, immunostaining results, and the prognosis of irAEs, including BP, in treatment courses.
RESUMEN
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are pivotal in managing metastatic non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They have unique toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Previous studies have linked irAEs during atezolizumab-based first-line treatments in advanced NSCLC with improved outcomes. This study explored the association between irAEs and the efficacy of atezolizumab in advanced NSCLC patients who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. The study involved 105 advanced NSCLC patients who received atezolizumab monotherapy after progressing on at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy from a single academic institution in Serbia. Data were obtained from a hospital lung cancer registry. Among the participants, 63.8% were male, with the majority being current (53.3%) or former smokers (37.1%). About half had a good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1) at the start of atezolizumab treatment. irAEs occurred in 23 patients (21.9%). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was significantly longer for patients with irAEs (13.03 months) compared to those without (3.4 months) (HR 0.365 [95% CI, 0.195-0.681], p = 0.002). irAEs and ECOG PS 0-1 were predictors of longer mPFS, with irAEs being more common in patients with good performance status (p = 0.01). irAEs were linked to improved mPFS in NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab after multiple lines of platinum-based chemotherapy.
RESUMEN
Background: Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy is currently the standard first-line treatment for advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Immunotherapy can induce specific adverse events, called immune-related adverse events (irAEs). IrAEs of bones have rarely been reported. However, identifying bone irAEs could be important in avoiding misdiagnosis and ensuring appropriate patient management. This is the first report describing the diagnosis of irAEs of osteoblastic bone changes mimicking bone metastasis in a SCLC patient treated with durvalumab. Case Description: In this report, we describe a unique and challenging case in which a 54-year-old female patient with SCLC treated with durvalumab, an immunotherapy drug, exhibited osteoblastic bone changes that appeared similar to bone metastasis on imaging but were actually a side effect of immunotherapy. Before treatment, imaging revealed no bone metastasis. In the third month after treatment with durvalumab, computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple bone alterations, predominantly osteoblastic lesions with minor osteolytic changes. Various imaging tests suggested bone metastasis, but she had no symptoms related to bone disease. Notably, the lesions in the chest had achieved a partial response. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the CT-guided pathological biopsy results, the patient's symptoms, and the biological characteristics of SCLC, we determined that these bone changes were irAEs occurring in the skeletal system. The patient was followed up for 10 months, during which time the bone lesions remained stable. Conclusions: IrAEs of bones are rare, and their manifestations vary. Sometimes, the imaging manifestations of bone irAEs are difficult to distinguish from bone metastasis. If patients show variable treatment responses between different lesions, careful evaluation (including a pathological biopsy) is necessary.
RESUMEN
Aim: This cohort study evaluated the association between immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-induced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and mortality as well as ICI discontinuation among older adults with NSCLC.Methods: 2007-2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database was used and survival analysis with time-varying exposure of irAEs was applied to estimate the associations.Results & conclusion: A total of 8,175 individuals were included, with 46.8% of whom developed an irAE. Cox regression models showed the occurrence of any irAEs was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.63-1.82) and treatment discontinuation (HR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.78-1.97). Some variability was observed in the effect on the two outcomes depending on the type of irAE.
A few studies have suggested that certain adverse events related to the immune system (called immune-related adverse events, or irAEs) following treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are linked to better clinical outcomes associated with ICI treatment. In contrast, this study of older adults with lung cancer found that patients suffering from irAEs were more likely to die and discontinue ICI treatment. Adverse events such as pneumonitis, arrhythmia, acute kidney injury, hepatitis and colitis were found to be associated with worse outcomes, while hypothyroidism and dermatologic irAEs were not. To prevent life-threatening outcomes for older adults with lung cancer, it is important to closely monitor for the development of irAEs following the initiation of ICI therapy.
RESUMEN
A 65-year-old man treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma was admitted to our hospital with a fever, difficulty in moving, and aphasia. The patient became comatose immediately after admission. Imaging and cerebral fluid tests revealed no evidence of malignancy or infection. A diagnosis of atezolizumab-induced encephalitis was made, and steroid pulse therapy was initiated on admission, immediately after which the patient regained consciousness and was able to talk and walk. He was discharged with slight paralysis of his legs and was able to resume chemotherapy. An early diagnosis and treatment are required to improve the prognosis of encephalitis.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Describe the demographic data and clinical phenotype of cranial palsy induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (CNP-ICI). METHODS: A systematic literature review of the literature was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase, including 68 articles and 136 patients (PROSPERO no. CRD42024517262). RESULTS: Out of the 1205 articles screened, 68 articles were included after fulfilling the inclusion criteria, for a total of 136 patients. All articles were case reports and case series. In the cohort studied, 52% of patients were treated with anti PD-1/PDL-1 therapies, 14% with anti CTLA-4 therapies, and 34% with a combination of anti CTLA-4 and anti PD-1/PDL-1 therapies. The facial nerve was the most affected cranial nerve, involved in 38% of cases, followed by the optic nerve (35%), the cochleovestibular nerve (12%), and the abducens nerve (10%). The median time from the initial immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) injection to the onset CNP-ICI was 10 weeks (IQR 4-20). Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated contrast enhancement or abnormal signal of the affected nerve in 43% of cases. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis indicated lymphocytic pleocytosis in 59% of cases. At the onset of immune-related adverse events, 89% of patients discontinued immunotherapy, and 92% received treatment for CNP-ICI. Treatment regimens included corticosteroids in 86% of cases, intravenous immunoglobulin in 21%, and plasma exchange in 5.1%. Among the whole population, 33% achieved recovery, 52% showed clinical improvement, 16% remained stable, and 3% experienced worsening of their condition. Rechallenge with immunotherapy was significantly associated with the emergence of new immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs). CONCLUSION: ICI therapy may lead to cranial nerve involvement, particularly affecting the facial nerve, typically presenting around 10 weeks after treatment initiation. While corticosteroid therapy often resulted in patient improvement, rechallenging with ICIs were associated with new irAEs.
RESUMEN
We herein report a 64-year-old man with KRASG12C-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). One month after starting second-line sotorasib treatment, the patient experienced a progressive decline in serum hemoglobin levels. Anemia was accompanied by markedly elevated serum erythropoietin levels and decreased reticulocyte levels. Bone marrow aspiration revealed pure red cell aplasia. No secondary causes other than medication use were identified. Suspected causative drugs were sotorasib and ICIs. Discontinuation of sotorasib for one week improved his anemia; therefore, the causative drug was identified as sotorasib.
RESUMEN
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a crucial role in treating various cancers. While ICIs are invaluable in the fight against different cancers, they also pose the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can range widely in symptoms and severity. Rheumatologic complications, including digital ischemia, are among the irAEs. While rare, they require early detection for effective management. The aim of the study is to present a case report on digital ischemia related to immunotherapy and to conduct a literature review on relevant cases. We present a case involving a patient from our oncology department who developed, pericarditis, digital ischemia and anti-centromere antibodies during immunotherapy with pembrolizumab for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We collaborated with our rheumatology department to initiate treatment, including corticosteroids, iloprost, and mycophenolate mofetil. Through the follow-up, the patient showed clinical improvement. A literature review identified only 10 relevant articles, highlighting the rarity of digital ischemia as an irAE. Corticosteroids and vasodilators were commonly used treatments, with amputation unavoidable in 40% of cases. IrAEs are becoming more common due to the widespread use of ICIs. For this reason, it is crucial to diagnose and treat rare IrAEs, such as digital ischemia, as early as possible to improve outcomes.
RESUMEN
The rapidly expanding class of therapies targeting immune checkpoints for the treatment of various cancers now includes 8 clinically approved agents: a lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) inhibitor (relatlimab), a cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor (ipilimumab), three programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab and cemiplimab), and three programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab). Previously, we reviewed the mechanisms of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), strategies for management of irAEs, and highlighted similarities as well as differences amongst clinical guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Herein, we provide an update that includes discussion of changes to these clinical guidelines since our last review, the new LAG-3 targeted agents, emerging patterns of irAEs, and new directions for improved monitoring and treatment of irAEs that could incorporate interdisciplinary pharmacist-led teams, artificial intelligence, and pharmacogenomics.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Atelectasia Pulmonar , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Atelectasia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Atelectasia Pulmonar/etiología , Neumonía/inducido químicamente , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents one of the most significant advancements in cancer treatment over the past decade. Nivolumab, a widely used ICI, has been incorporated into the therapeutic regimens for various cancers. As with any drug, this drug also has side effects, including class-specific immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Although irAEs are not rare, their diagnosis can be challenging. This study examines the emergency department (ED) visits of patients undergoing nivolumab therapy, focusing on diagnostic challenges, evaluating the management, and outcomes of irAEs in the ED setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients who received nivolumab therapy for any cancer between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2023, at a large, urban tertiary care center. In this study, we evaluated the ED visits of patients receiving nivolumab. In addition to previous studies, we evaluated irAEs in detail (percentage, recognizability, risk factors, reasons for late recognition, and outcome). Patient data were collected from electronic medical records and patient's medical files. The anamnesis, laboratory, and imaging results, ED management, and consultation notes were examined separately for each ED visit. Logistic regression models were employed to identify significant univariable predictors of ED visits and irAEs. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients were included in the study, all of whom had metastatic cancer. Of these, 154 patients (77.4%) received nivolumab therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Most patients (71.9%, n = 143) had at least one additional comorbidity. One hundred and eleven patients (55.8%) presented to the ED. Hypertension (OR: 2.425, 95% CI: 1.226-4.795, p = 0.011) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 2.489, 95% CI: 1.133-5.468, p = 0.023) were identified as risk factors for ED visits. A total of 21 irAEs were diagnosed (14 in ED, 6 in the oncology clinic, and 1 in the inpatient ward). Univariate analysis found no significant association between irAE diagnosis and any specific factors. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of the patients treated with nivolumab for advanced cancer present to ED for ICI-related adverse events, although most cases were not attributable to irAEs. Due to the vague symptomatology of irAEs, their recognition and diagnosis in the ED can be challenging. Close collaboration between ED physicians and oncologists is paramount to the management of patients with cancer in the ED.