RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dermatologic disease has been shown to have high rates of diagnostic and treatment discordance between dermatologists and non-specialists. Inpatient dermatology consultative services have the potential to improve patient care, but there is a paucity of data evaluating the quantitative effects of such services. This study aimed to evaluate the impact a newly established inpatient dermatology service had on quantitative patient care outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared quantitative care measures of dermatologic inpatients during the years both pre- and post-implementation of an academic hospital's dermatology consultative service. The primary outcomes included hospitalization duration, readmission rates, and establishment of outpatient dermatologic care. RESULTS: The study found a 1.04-day reduction in hospital length of stay (p-value = 0.046) after the consultation service establishment. Additionally, there was a significant increase in the rate by which patients sought outpatient dermatology follow-up (6.7% versus 24.4%, p-value <0.001). No significant change in the all-cause readmission rate was identified. CONCLUSION: The reduction of hospitalization duration supports inpatient dermatology services as a viable means to provide improved patient care and reduce health systems costs. Hospitals that do not have a consulting service for cutaneous conditions provided by a dermatology specialist should strongly consider establishing such a department.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dermatology is primarily an outpatient specialty. However, dermatology consultations play an important role in care of inpatients. Data on inpatient dermatological consultations in tertiary care settings is limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical characteristics of inpatient dermatological consultations and effect on clinical outcomes in a tertiary care setting. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study where the records of all dermatological consultations for patients admitted under various specialties, emergency services, and intensive care units (ICU) at our tertiary care institute over 2 years period were reviewed. The details of patients, primary care unit, dermatological complaints, diagnosis, investigations performed, treatment given, and follow-up were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Total of 1717 dermatologic consultations (1000 males) were recorded, with mean age of study population being 33.6 ± 21.6 years (median - 32 years). Out of total 1717 patients, 136 (7.9%), 321 (18.7%), 1135 (66.1%), and 125 (7.3%) patients were infants, children, adolescents, adults, and elderly, respectively. The most frequent diagnostic group was infective diseases (586; 34.1%) followed by inflammatory diseases (442; 25.7%), mucocutaneous adverse drug reactions (160; 9.3%), and autoimmune diseases (65; 3.8%). Primary team's diagnosis was concordant with the dermatology consultation in 1112 (64.8%) patients and discordant observations were recorded in 605 patients (35.2%). Most discordant dermatological diagnoses included inflammatory disorders such as lichen planus, atopic dermatitis, bullous pemphigoid; mechanical disorders; nutritional deficiency disorders, and benign neoplasms. CONCLUSION: Common skin conditions account for a large majority of dermatologic consultations in a hospital setting. Inpatient dermatology consultations improve the diagnostic accuracy.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Dermatologic complaints are a common reason for emergency department visits. METHODS: Retrospective chart review from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. Patients in the Mayo Clinic Emergency Department receiving dermatology consultation were included. RESULTS: Dermatitis (24.7%, n = 113), infection (20.4%, n = 93), and drug reaction (10.3%, n = 47) accounted for the majority of diagnoses. Emergency department providers often provide no diagnosis (38%) or a differential diagnosis (22%), and dermatology consultation frequently alters diagnosis (46%) and treatment (83%). Patients receiving in-person consultations are admitted more frequently than those receiving teledermatology consultations (40% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). Primary diagnostic concordance with subsequent dermatology evaluation is high for in-person (94%) and teledermatology (88%) consultations. DISCUSSION: This is the largest study of emergency department dermatology consultations in the United States and the first to compare in-person and teledermatology emergency department consultation utilization in clinical practice. These modalities are utilized in a complementary fashion at our institution, with severe dermatologic diagnoses seen in-person. The valuable role of emergency department dermatologists is highlighted by frequent changes to diagnosis and treatment plans that result from dermatology consultation. Furthermore, our data suggest that teledermatology is an effective modality with the potential to expand access to dermatologic expertise in the emergency department setting.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Age, bicarbonate, cancer, dialysis, 10% body surface area risk model (ABCD-10) has recently been proposed as an alternative to the SCORe of toxic epidermal necrolysis (SCORTEN) model for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). In contrast to SCORTEN, ABCD-10 incorporates prior dialysis and upweights the impact of cancer. OBJECTIVE: To determine the performance of ABCD-10 compared with that of SCORTEN in mortality prediction at a large, tertiary burn center. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 192 patients with SJS/TEN admitted to the North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019, was conducted. Data on these patients were collected using the burn registry and a manual chart review. The performance of both the mortality prediction models was assessed using univariate logistic regression and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: The overall mortality was 22% (n = 43). Nine (5%) patients had cancer, and 7 (4%) had undergone prior dialysis; neither factor was associated with mortality (P = .11 and P = .62, respectively). SCORTEN was well calibrated to predict inpatient mortality (P = .82), whereas ABCD-10 appeared to have a poorer fit (P < .001) in these patients. Both the models showed good discrimination. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSION: SCORTEN was a better predictor of inpatient mortality than ABCD-10 in a North American cohort of patients treated at the tertiary burn center.