RESUMEN

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the most common cause of death in Europe. Despite proven benefits, use of lipid-lowering therapy remains suboptimal. Treatment goals are often not achieved, even in patients at high risk with atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). The occurrence of CV events in patients on lipid-lowering drugs is defined as "residual risk", and can result from inadequate control of plasma lipids or blood pressure, inflammation, diabetes, and environmental hazards. Assessment of CV risk factors and vascular imaging can aid in the evaluation and management decisions for individual patients. Lifestyle measures remain the primary intervention for lowering CV risk. Where drug therapies are required to reach lipid treatment targets, their effectiveness increases when they are combined with lifestyle measures delivered through formal programs. However, lipid drug dosage and poor adherence to treatment remain major obstacles to event-free survival. This article discusses guideline-supported treatment algorithms beyond statin therapy that can help reduce residual risk in specific patient profiles while also likely resulting in substantial healthcare savings through better patient management and treatment adherence.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a highly prevalent monogenic disorder characterized by elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Sex disparities in diagnosis, lipid-lowering therapy, and achieved lipid levels have emerged worldwide, resulting in barriers to care in FH. A systematic review was performed to investigate sex-related disparities in treatment, response, and lipid target achievement in FH (PROSPERO, CRD42022353297). METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane library, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and grey literature databases were searched from inception to 26 April 2023. Records were eligible if they described sex differences in the treatment of adults with FH. RESULTS: Of 4432 publications reviewed, 133 met our eligibility criteria. In 16 interventional clinical trials (eight randomized and eight non-randomized; 1840 participants, 49.4% females), there were no differences between males and females in response to fixed doses of lipid-lowering therapy, suggesting that sex was not a determinant of response. Meta-analysis of 25 real-world observational studies (129 441 participants, 53.4% females) found that females were less likely to be on lipid-lowering therapy compared with males (odds ratio .74, 95% confidence interval .66-.85). Importantly, females were less likely to reach an LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/L (odds ratio .85, 95% confidence interval .74-.97). Similarly, treated LDL-C levels were higher in females. Despite this, male sex was associated with a two-fold greater relative risk of major adverse cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Females with FH were less likely to be treated intensively and to reach guideline-recommended LDL-C targets. This sex bias represents a surmountable barrier to clinical care.

Asunto(s)

LDL-Colesterol , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/sangre , Femenino , Masculino , Factores Sexuales , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by severely elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In the pivotal Phase 3 HoFH trial (NCT03399786), evinacumab significantly decreased LDL-C in patients with HoFH. This study assesses the long-term safety and efficacy of evinacumab in adult and adolescent patients with HoFH. METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm, Phase 3 trial (NCT03409744), patients aged ≥12 years with HoFH who were evinacumab-naïve or had previously received evinacumab in other trials (evinacumab-continue) received intravenous evinacumab 15 mg/kg every 4 weeks with stable lipid-lowering therapy. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (adults: n = 102; adolescents: n = 14) were enrolled, of whom 57 (49.1%) were female. Patients were treated for a median (range) duration of 104.3 (28.3-196.3) weeks. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were reported in 93 (80.2%) and 27 (23.3%) patients, respectively. Two (1.7%) deaths were reported (neither was considered related to evinacumab). Three (2.6%) patients discontinued due to TEAEs (none were considered related to evinacumab). From baseline to Week 24, evinacumab decreased mean LDL-C by 43.6% [mean (standard deviation, SD), 3.4 (3.2) mmol/L] in the overall population; mean LDL-C reduction in adults and adolescents was 41.7% [mean (SD), 3.2 (3.3) mmol/L] and 55.4% [mean (SD), 4.7 (2.5) mmol/L], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients with HoFH, evinacumab was generally well tolerated and markedly decreased LDL-C irrespective of age and sex. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of evinacumab was sustained over the long term.

Asunto(s)

LDL-Colesterol , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/administración & dosificación , Anticolesterolemiantes/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Niño , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Homocigoto

RESUMEN

Over several decades, the approach to treating dyslipidaemias during pregnancy remains essentially unchanged. The lack of advancement in this field is mostly related to the fact that we lack clinical trials of pregnant patients both with available as well as new therapies. While there are numerous novel therapies developed for non-pregnant patients, there are still many limitations in dyslipidaemia treatment during pregnancy. Besides pharmacotherapy and careful clinical assessment, the initiation of behavioural modifications as well as pre-conception management is very important. Among the various lipid-lowering medications, bile acid sequestrants are the only ones officially approved for treating dyslipidaemia in pregnancy. Ezetimibe and fenofibrate can be considered if their benefits outweigh potential risks. Statins are still considered contraindicated, primarily due to animal studies and human case reports. However, recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as data on familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) in pregnant patients have indicated that their use may not be harmful and could even be beneficial in certain selected cases. This is especially relevant for pregnant patients at very high cardiovascular risk, such as those who have already experienced an acute cardiovascular event or have homozygous or severe forms of heterozygous FH. In these cases, the decision to continue therapy during pregnancy should weigh the potential risks of discontinuation. Bempedoic acid, olezarsen, evinacumab, evolocumab and alirocumab, and inclisiran are options to consider just before and after pregnancy is completed. In conclusion, decisions regarding lipid-lowering therapy for pregnant patients should be personalized. Despite the challenges in designing and conducting studies in pregnant women, there is a strong need to establish the safety and efficacy of dyslipidaemia treatment during pregnancy.

Asunto(s)

Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño

RESUMEN

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia is a life-threatening genetic condition, which causes extremely elevated LDL-C levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease very early in life. It is vital to start effective lipid-lowering treatment from diagnosis onwards. Even with dietary and current multimodal pharmaceutical lipid-lowering therapies, LDL-C treatment goals cannot be achieved in many children. Lipoprotein apheresis is an extracorporeal lipid-lowering treatment, which is used for decades, lowering serum LDL-C levels by more than 70% directly after the treatment. Data on the use of lipoprotein apheresis in children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia mainly consists of case-reports and case-series, precluding strong evidence-based guidelines. We present a consensus statement on lipoprotein apheresis in children based on the current available evidence and opinions from experts in lipoprotein apheresis from over the world. It comprises practical statements regarding the indication, methods, treatment goals and follow-up of lipoprotein apheresis in children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and on the role of lipoprotein(a) and liver transplantation.

Asunto(s)

Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos , Consenso , Homocigoto , Humanos , Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Niño , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lipoproteína(a)/sangre , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Adolescente , Trasplante de Hígado , Biomarcadores/sangre , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo I/diagnóstico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo I/terapia , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo I/sangre , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo I/genética , Fenotipo , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/terapia , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/sangre , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/genética , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Preescolar , Lipoproteínas/sangre , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Novel lipid-lowering therapies are being introduced. Few studies exist of the real-world effectiveness of adenosine-tri-phosphate citrate lyase inhibition with bempedoic acid. METHODS: This study audited bempedoic acid therapy in 216 consecutive patients from three hospital centres - a university hospital (n = 77) and two district general hospitals (n = 106 and 33). Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, prescription qualification criteria, efficacy and adverse effects were assessed. RESULTS: The population was aged 65.9 ± 11.0 years, 42% were male, 25% had type 2 diabetes, and 31% had familial hypercholesterolaemia. CVD was present in 19% and multibed vascular disease in 8%. Statin intolerance was reported in 92%. Bempedoic acid reduced total cholesterol by 1.58 ± 1.44 mmol/L (20%), LDL-C by 1.37 ± 1.31 mmol/L (27%), triglycerides by 0.22 mmol/L (2%) with an 0.06 mmol/L (1%) increase in HDL-C after 22 ± 9 months follow-up. An LDL-C <2.5 mmol/L was achieved in 40% and <2 mmol/L in 20%. Efficacy (r2 = .33) was predicted by baseline LDL-C (ß = .54; p <.001). No significant changes were seen in transaminases, creatinine, creatine kinase, urate or HbA1c. Treatment was discontinued by 33% of patients and occurred due to myalgia (43%), lack of efficacy (16%) and gastrointestinal adverse effects (15%). No cases of gout were observed. In a logistic regression only the number of previous drug classes not tolerated (ß = 1.60; p = .009) was a contributing factor to discontinuation. CONCLUSION: This audit suggests that bempedoic acid therapy is effective but that adverse effects and discontinuation are common. This suggests nocebo effects might be generalizable to all lipid-lowering drug therapies in susceptible individuals.

RESUMEN

Background: Despite recent guidelines appropriate lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) remains suboptimal in everyday clinical practice. Aims: We aimed to describe clinical practice of use of LLT for at least high CV risk populations in a Hellenic real-world setting and assess how this relates to the European Society of Cardiology treatment guidelines. Methods: We analyzed data from a retrospective cohort study of the National Registry of patients with dyslipidemia between 1/7/2017 and 30/6/2019 who were at least of high CV risk and filled a dual or triple lipid-lowering treatment (dLLT, tLLT) prescription. The primary outcomes of interest of this analysis were to report on the patterns of LLT use in at least high CV risk patients. Results: A total of 994,255 (45.4% of Greeks on LLT) were of at least high CV risk and 120,490 (5.5%) were on dLLT or tLLT. The percentage of patients with reported statin intolerance ranged from 2 to 10%. While persistence was reported to be satisfactory (>85% for both dLLT or tLLT), adherence was low (ranging between 14 and 34% for dLLT). In 6-month intervals, the percentage of patients achieving a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target below 100 md/dL ranged from 20% to 23% for dLLT and 34%-37% for tLLT. Conclusions: The prevalence of at least high CV risk patients among patients receiving LLT in Greece is substantial. Despite the high persistence and probably due to the low adherence to treatment, LDL-C remains above targets in more than two thirds of patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) warrants early diagnosis to prevent premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, underdiagnosis and undertreatment of FH persist. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of FH care among general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands. METHODS: An internationally standardised, online questionnaire was sent to Dutch GPs between February 2021 and July 2022. The survey assessed knowledge and awareness of FH, encompassing general familiarity, awareness of management guidelines, inheritance, prevalence, CVD risk, and clinical practice related to FH. Comparative analysis was performed using data on primary care physicians from Western Australia, the Asia-Pacific region and the United Kingdom. RESULTS: Of the 221 participating GPs, 62.4% rated their familiarity with FH as above average (score > 4 on a 1-7 scale), with 91.4% considering themselves familiar with FH treatment and referral guidelines. Correct identification of the FH definition, typical lipid profile, inheritance pattern, prevalence and CVD risk was reported by 83.7%, 87.8%, 55.7%, 19.5%, and 13.6% of the respondents, respectively. Of the participants, 58.4% answered fewer than half of the 8 knowledge questions correctly. Dutch GPs reported greater FH familiarity and guideline awareness compared with their international counterparts but exhibited similar low performance on FH knowledge questions. CONCLUSION: Despite the Netherlands' relatively high FH detection rate, substantial knowledge gaps regarding FH persist among Dutch GPs, mirroring global trends. Enhanced FH education and awareness in primary care are imperative to improve FH detection and ensure adequate treatment. Targeting the global suboptimal understanding of FH might require international efforts.

RESUMEN

Background: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic condition predominantly caused by the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene mutation. Case summary: This is the case of a 54-year-old Malay woman with genetically confirmed FH complicated by premature coronary artery disease (PCAD). She was clinically diagnosed in primary care at 52 years old, fulfilling the Simon Broome Criteria (possible FH), Dutch Lipid Clinic Criteria (score of 8: probable FH), and Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Case Ascertainment Tool (relative risk score of 9.51). Subsequently, she was confirmed to have a heterozygous LDLR c.190+4A>T intron 2 pathogenic variant at the age of 53 years. She was known to have hypercholesterolaemia and was treated with statin since the age of 25. However, the lipid-lowering agent was not intensified to achieve the recommended treatment target. The delayed FH diagnosis has caused this patient to have PCAD and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at the age of 29 years and a second PCI at the age of 49 years. She also has a very strong family history of hypercholesterolaemia and PCAD, where seven out of eight of her siblings were affected. Despite this, FH was not diagnosed early, and cascade screening of family members was not conducted, resulting in a missed opportunity to prevent PCAD. Discussion: Familial hypercholesterolaemia can be clinically diagnosed in primary care to identify those who may require genetic testing. Multidisciplinary care focuses on improving identification, cascade screening, and management of FH, which is vital to improving prognosis and ultimately preventing PCAD.

RESUMEN

AIMS: The availability of novel lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) has remarkably changed the clinical management of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH). The impact of these advances was evaluated in a cohort of 139 HoFH patients followed in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of 139 HoFH patients, along with information about LLTs and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at baseline and after a median follow-up of 5 years, were retrospectively retrieved from the records of patients enrolled in the LIPid transport disorders Italian GEnetic Network-Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (LIPIGEN-FH) Registry. The annual rates of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (MACE-plus) during follow-up were compared before and after baseline. Additionally, the lifelong survival free from MACE-plus was compared with that of the historical LIPIGEN HoFH cohort. At baseline, LDL-C level was 332 ± 138 mg/dL. During follow-up, the potency of LLTs was enhanced and, at the last visit, 15.8% of patients were taking quadruple therapy. Consistently, LDL-C decreased to an average value of 124 mg/dL corresponding to a 58.3% reduction (Pt < 0.001), with the lowest value (∼90 mg/dL) reached in patients receiving proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors and lomitapide and/or evinacumab as add-on therapies. The average annual MACE-plus rate in the 5-year follow-up was significantly lower than that observed during the 5 years before baseline visit (21.7 vs. 56.5 per 1000 patients/year; P = 0.0016). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the combination of novel and conventional LLTs significantly improved LDL-C control with a signal of better cardiovascular prognosis in HoFH patients. Overall, these results advocate the use of intensive, multidrug LLTs to effectively manage HoFH.

---

Contemporary real-world data from the Italian cohort of patients affected by homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia demonstrated that the addition of novel, low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-independent medications to conventional therapies allowed the achievement of unprecedented low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values with a trend towards a reduction of cardiovascular risk.

Asunto(s)

LDL-Colesterol , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/sangre , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/genética , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Italia/epidemiología , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Homocigoto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Biomarcadores/sangre , Factores de Riesgo , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Inhibidores de PCSK9/uso terapéutico , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapéutico

Asunto(s)

Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Inhibidores de PCSK9 , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anciano , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Proproteína Convertasa 9

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies utilising genotyping methods report the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia to be as high as one in 137 of the adult population. AIM: To estimate the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia measured by clinically coded diagnosis, associated treatments, and lipid measurements observed in UK primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a retrospective analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD database. METHOD: Patients aged ≥18 years and actively registered on the index date (30 June 2018) formed the study cohort. Point prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia for 2018 was estimated overall and for each nation of the UK. Patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia were stratified into primary and secondary prevention groups, defined as those with/without a prior diagnosis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Prevalence estimates and extrapolations were replicated for these subgroups. Baseline demographic, lipid, and clinical characteristics for the prevalent cohort were presented. RESULTS: In total, 4048 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia formed the study cohort. The estimated familial hypercholesterolaemia prevalence for the UK was 16.4 per 10 000 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 16.0 to 16.9). Of these, 2646 (65.4%) patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia had a recent prescription for lipid-lowering therapy. Mean lipid levels were lower for those treated with lipid-lowering therapy compared with those untreated: 5.34 mmol/L (SD 1.50) versus 6.25 mmol/L (SD 1.55) for total cholesterol and 3.15 mmol/L (SD 1.34) versus 3.96 mmol/L (SD 1.36) for low-level density lipoprotein cholesterol. CONCLUSION: The estimated prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia was one in 608 of the population, less than expected from other studies, which may indicate that familial hypercholesterolaemia is under-recognised in UK primary care. Over one-third of diagnosed patients were undertreated and many did not achieve target goals, placing them at risk of cardiovascular events.

Asunto(s)

Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/epidemiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevalencia , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , LDL-Colesterol/sangre

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Microvascular dysfunction underlies many cardiovascular disease conditions; little is known regarding its presence in individuals with high levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. The aim of the present study was to determine the frequency of microvascular dysfunction among such subjects with and without concomitant familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). METHODS: Four groups of asymptomatic individuals aged 30-59 years, without manifest cardiovascular disease, were recruited (n = 30 per group): controls with Lp(a) < 30 nmol/L, mutation-confirmed FH with Lp(a) < 30 nmol/L, or >125 nmol/L, and individuals with isolated Lp(a) > 125 nmol/L. Participants underwent evaluation of myocardial microvascular function by measuring coronary flow reserve (CFR) using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, and of peripheral microvascular endothelial function by peripheral arterial tonometry. RESULTS: The groups were balanced in age, sex, and body mass index. Each of the three dyslipoproteinaemic groups had a greater proportion of individuals with impaired coronary flow reserve, 30%, compared to 6.7% of controls (p = 0.014). The median CFR levels did not differ significantly between the four groups, however. Cholesterol-lowering treatment time was longer in the individuals with normal than in those with impaired CFR in the FH + Lp(a) > 125 group (p = 0.023), but not in the group with FH + Lp(a) < 30 (p = 0.468). There was no difference in peripheral endothelial function between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary microvascular dysfunction is more prevalent in asymptomatic individuals with isolated Lp(a) elevation and in heterozygous FH both with and without high Lp(a) compared to healthy controls. Cholesterol-lowering treatment could potentially prevent the development of microvascular dysfunction.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Isquemia Miocárdica , Humanos , Lipoproteína(a) , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Prevalencia , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/complicaciones , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/epidemiología , Colesterol

RESUMEN

AIMS: To investigate the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) and compare the performance of clinical criteria and genetic testing in patients undergoing coronary angiography. METHODS: The prevalence of FH was determined with the Dutch Lipid Clinical Network (DLCN), US-MEDPED, Simon Broome (SB) criteria, the 'Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Case Ascertainment Tool' (FAMCAT), and a clinical algorithm. Genetic screening was conducted with a custom array from Affymetrix (CARRENAL array) harboring 944 FH mutations. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 3267 patients (78.6% with coronary artery disease [CAD]). FH was diagnosed in 2.8%, 2.2%, 3.9%, and 7.9% using the DLCN, US-MEDPED, SB criteria, and the FAMCAT. The clinical algorithm identified the same patients as the SB criteria. Pathogenic FH mutations were found in 1.2% (1.2% in patients with CAD, 1.0% in patients without CAD). FH was more frequently diagnosed in younger patients. With genetic testing as reference, the clinical criteria achieved areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) in the range of 0.56-0.68. Using only LDL-C corrected for statin intake, an AUC of 0.68 was achieved. CONCLUSION: FH is up to fourfold more prevalent in patients undergoing coronary angiography than in contemporary cohorts representing the general population. Different clinical criteria yield substantially different diagnosis rates, overestimating the prevalence of FH compared to genetic testing. LDL-C testing alone may be sufficient to raise the suspicion of FH, which then needs to be corroborated by genetic testing.

RESUMEN

AIMS: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) patients are subjected to a high lifetime exposure to low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), despite use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). This study aimed to quantify the extent of subclinical atherosclerosis and to evaluate the association between lifetime cumulative LDL-C exposure and coronary atherosclerosis in young FH patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Familial hypercholesterolaemia patients, divided into a subgroup of early treated (LLT initiated <25 years) and late treated (LLT initiated ≥25 years) patients, and an age- and sex-matched unaffected control group, underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) with artificial intelligence-guided analysis. Ninety genetically diagnosed FH patients and 45 unaffected volunteers (mean age 41 ± 3 years, 51 (38%) female) were included. Familial hypercholesterolaemia patients had higher cumulative LDL-C exposure (181 ± 54 vs. 105 ± 33 mmol/L ∗ years) and higher prevalence of coronary plaque compared with controls (46 [51%] vs. 10 [22%], OR 3.66 [95%CI 1.62-8.27]). Every 75 mmol/L ∗ years cumulative exposure to LDL-C was associated with a doubling in per cent atheroma volume (total plaque volume divided by total vessel volume). Early treated patients had a modestly lower cumulative LDL-C exposure compared with late treated FH patients (167 ± 41 vs. 194 ± 61 mmol/L ∗ years; P = 0.045), without significant difference in coronary atherosclerosis. Familial hypercholesterolaemia patients with above-median cumulative LDL-C exposure had significantly higher plaque prevalence (OR 3.62 [95%CI 1.62-8.27]; P = 0.001), compared with patients with below-median exposure. CONCLUSION: Lifetime exposure to LDL-C determines coronary plaque burden in FH, underlining the need of early as well as potent treatment initiation. Periodic CCTA may offer a unique opportunity to monitor coronary atherosclerosis and personalize treatment in FH.

---

This study reveals that young patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), as compared with individuals without FH, have a higher build-up of coronary artery plaque, linked directly to their increased lifetime exposure to LDL cholesterol. Genetically confirmed FH patients have a higher coronary plaque burden than those without FH, with every 75 mmol/L ∗ years increase in lifetime cumulative LDL cholesterol exposure resulting in a two-fold increase in total plaque volume. Early and potent LDL cholesterol lowering treatments are crucial for FH patients to prevent future cardiovascular diseases.

Asunto(s)

LDL-Colesterol , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/sangre , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/complicaciones , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Masculino , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/prevención & control , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/etiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/sangre , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Factores de Tiempo , Prevalencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placa Aterosclerótica , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico

RESUMEN

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), a common monogenic disorder, is a preventable cause of premature coronary artery disease and death. Up to 35 million people worldwide have FH, but most remain undetected and undertreated. Several clinical guidelines have addressed the gaps in care of FH, but little focus has been given to implementation science and practice. The International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS) has developed an evidence-informed guidance for the detection and management of patients with FH, supplemented with implementation strategies to optimize contextual models of care. The guidance is partitioned into detection, management and implementation sections. Detection deals with screening, diagnosis, genetic testing and counselling. Management includes risk stratification, treatment of adults and children with heterozygous and homozygous FH, management of FH during pregnancy, and use of lipoprotein apheresis. Specific and general implementation strategies, guided by processes specified by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy, are provided. Core generic implementation strategies are given for improving care. Nation-specific cholesterol awareness campaigns should be utilized to promote better detection of FH. Integrated models of care should be underpinned by health policy and adapted to meet local, regional and national needs. Clinical centres of excellence are important for taking referrals from the community. General practitioners should work seamlessly with multidisciplinary teams. All health-care providers must receive training in essential skills for caring for patients and families with FH. Management should be supported by shared decision-making and service improvement driven by patient-reported outcomes. Improvements in services require sharing of existing resources that can support care. Advocacy should be utilized to ensure sustainable funding. Digital health technologies and clinical quality registries have special value. Finally, academic-service partnerships need to be developed to identify gaps in care and set priorities for research. This new IAS guidance on FH complements the recent World Heart Federation Cholesterol Roadmap.

Asunto(s)

Aterosclerosis , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/epidemiología , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/genética , Pruebas Genéticas , Aterosclerosis/diagnóstico , Aterosclerosis/prevención & control , Colesterol , Consejo

RESUMEN

This is an overview of the EAS Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) Studies Collaboration (FHSC) global consortium and registry (established 2015), which broadly addresses the global burden of FH. Eighty-seven National Lead Investigators from 74 countries form this expanding global consortium, and this global registry currently includes pooled data on 70,000 participants from participating countries to facilitate FH surveillance. Published first results from this global registry concluded that FH is diagnosed late, and management of LDL-cholesterol falls below guideline recommendations, and therefore earlier detection of FH and wider use of combination therapy is required. Further FHSC studies will follow on updated data including new countries, participants and variables, and non-DNA genetic information, and on the remaining cohorts in the registry. FHSC cross-sectional collaborative global studies are expected to promote FH detection earlier in life to subsequently initiate early lipid lowering therapy to reduce lifelong exposure to cumulative LDL-cholesterol thus reducing cardiovascular disease risk.

Asunto(s)

Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/epidemiología , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/genética , LDL-Colesterol

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a genetic disease characterised by hypercholesterolaemia and premature cardiovascular events. Early diagnosis and treatment can reduce the cardiovascular burden. We describe the characteristics of patients with heterozygous FH followed in a tertiary hospital in Belgium. METHODS: We retrospectively studied a population of 321 patients with definite heterozygous FH who visited the UZ Leuven lipid clinic at least once between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020. Data are represented as mean ± SD. RESULTS: The age at time of diagnosis of FH was 39 ± 18 years. Patients with atherosclerotic disease (secondary prevention) were older (p < .001), more often male (p < .001), had a higher body mass index (p < .001), prevalence of (pre)diabetes (p < .001) and hypertension (p < .001) and had lower levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (p < .001) than individuals without atherosclerotic disease (primary prevention). The average LDL-C in both primary (109 ± 53 mg/dL) and secondary (81 ± 63 mg/dL) prevention did not meet the targets of LDL-C as proposed by the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. However, LDL-C levels in the subgroup of patients treated with PCSK9 inhibition therapy, and especially in the triple therapy group (combination of statin, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitor), were markedly lower (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this Belgian population, people with heterozygous FH remain undertreated. Reaching treatment targets in FH seems possible, although this requires combination treatment (with PCSK9-targeted therapy) in most patients. Earlier diagnosis of FH, more extensive lipid-lowering treatment and reimbursement options and a more holistic approach are needed to lower LDL-C and cardiovascular risk in patients with FH.

Asunto(s)

Anticolesterolemiantes , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proproteína Convertasa 9 , LDL-Colesterol , Estudios Retrospectivos , Bélgica/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/epidemiología , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/terapia , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico

RESUMEN

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a common, inherited condition independently causing cardiovascular disease. Recent expert recommendations suggest opportunistically testing for elevated Lp(a) during cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). We investigated the effectiveness of detecting elevated Lp(a) in 103 children and adolescents who were first-degree relatives of 66 adult index FH cases as part of an established FH cascade screening program. The yield of detection of elevated Lp(a) using a threshold of ≥30 mg/dL in children and adolescents was assessed. Cascade testing from FH index cases with elevated Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL identified 1 case of Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL for every 2 children or adolescents tested. In contrast, opportunistic screening from index cases with FH but normal Lp(a) levels demonstrated 1 case of Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL for every 7.5 children or adolescents tested (p < 0.001). In conclusion, cascade testing for elevated Lp(a) from index cases with FH and elevated Lp(a) is effective in identifying new cases of elevated Lp(a).

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Pruebas Genéticas , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/genética , Lipoproteína(a) , Tamizaje Masivo , Linaje