RESUMEN
Hip bipolar hemiarthroplasty, a widely employed surgical intervention for managing hip fractures and degenerative hip diseases, can pose significant challenges when revisions become necessary due to complications such as implant loosening, instability, or breakage. This case report presents the intricate management of a 58-year-old male who presented with worsening left hip pain a decade after undergoing hip replacement surgery. Despite a thorough preoperative assessment ruling out infection, intraoperative complexities included the necessity for extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) to address a broken stem and associated metallosis. Successful revision surgery was meticulously executed, incorporating techniques for implant removal, femoral shaft augmentation, and postoperative rehabilitation. The ensuing discussion explores the multifaceted aspects of failed hemiarthroplasty, emphasizing the critical roles of surgical precision, judicious patient selection, and ongoing research endeavors aimed at refining surgical strategies to optimize patient outcomes. This case underscores the imperative of a multidisciplinary approach and the continued imperative for advancements in surgical methodologies for effectively managing revision hip arthroplasty cases, thus enhancing the quality of patient care in this intricate clinical domain.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates (BP), a commonly used medication for various bone diseases, have been known to have severe complications such as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). Failure of dental implants has also been found in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). In this study, we analyzed the necrotic bone tissues and the surface of the failed implants removed from the jaw in patients treated with BPs and antiresorptive agents. RESULTS: Chronic inflammatory cells with collagen and fibrous tissues and bone sequestrum were shown at 5.0 × , 10.0 × , 20.0 × , and 40.0 × magnified histologic sections in the bone and fibrotic scar tissues removed from patients with MRONJ due to osteonecrosis. Hardened bone tissues with microcracked bony resorbed lacunae were observed in SEM. Unlike the previously published comparative data where immune cells, such as dendritic cells, were found in the failed implant surface, these immune cells were not identified in the BRONJ-related peri-implantitis tissues through the TEM investigations. Furthermore, EDS revealed that in addition to the main titanium element, gold, carbon, oxygen, calcium, phosphorus, silicon, and sulfur elements were found. CONCLUSION: Hardened bone tissues with microcracked bony resorbed lacunae were observed in the SEM findings, which were considered as the main characteristic of the osteonecrosis of the jaw. Immune cells, such as dendritic cells were not identified in the TEM. EDS showed that in addition to the main titanium element, gold, carbon, oxygen, calcium, phosphorus, and silicon elements were found. Furthermore, it was revealed that sulfur was found, which was considered to be one of the complicated causes of implant failure in patients with BRONJ.
RESUMEN
As the world is embracing technology, dental technology is merging with artificial intelligence. Dentists are striving to perfect the art of placing dental implants. Implants for the rehabilitation and retention of dental and facial prostheses have graduated from a phase of wishful thinking to one of the most gratifying experiences for patients and treating fraternity alike. Implants and restorations supported by implants have a good long-term survival percentage. Complications and implant failure, which can still happen, are seen by many clinicians as significant barriers to implant treatment. Implant therapy still involves a biological healing and integration process despite recent advancements. These biological processes are complex and may be hampered by local or systemic factors, which could result in problems and implant failure. For the implant surgeon and dental professional, it is crucial to manage patients who have certain risk factors and be able to address potential complications and failure. The aim of this article is to discuss frequent complications of implant failure and its management and help clinicians in placing and restoring implants less painfully and vicariously receive some valuable experience.
RESUMEN
Breast augmentation has been gaining popularity over the last two decades to correct congenital breast asymmetry or increase breast size and projection. Augmentation options started with saline implants, then silicone implants, and, recently, autologous fat transfer. Unfortunately, breast implants are not without complications, some of which are common, like capsular contracture, implant failure and infection. Others are quite rare, such as Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). Most of these complications will eventually require explantation in most cases, as the patients' and implants' age and risk of complications increase. We present a 79-year-old patient who presented to our breast unit with a left breast lump with 50-year-old saline implants. A triple assessment revealed incidental right breast cancer treated with radiofrequency identification (RFID) tag-guided wide local excision, sentinel lymph node biopsy and bilateral explantation.
RESUMEN
Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most popular reconstruction option following mastectomy. However, it is not without complications, some of which can be trivial while others can lead to significant morbidity, especially in geriatric patients. Severe capsular contracture, implant failure, infection, or suspected breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma are examples of complications that will eventually require explantation in most cases. As patients with implant-based reconstruction age, the risk of complications increases, which should be considered by treating physicians. We describe the case of a 90-year-old patient who presented to our emergency department after a fall with worsening confusion, which was attributed to a 60-year-old left breast implant rupture and a peri-implant infected hematoma confirmed with CT and ultrasound.
RESUMEN
Wear particles generated by hip and knee arthroplasties disseminate to the liver and spleen with the highest concentrations observed in subjects who have had a failed arthroplasty. We asked to what extent metallic particles could also disseminate to remote hematopoietic bone marrow. Cored samples of red marrow from the axial skeleton and proximal humerus were obtained postmortem from four males and two females aged 79-92 years. Seven to seventeen years prior to their demise, each subject had undergone successful revision of their arthroplasty for mechanical failure in which an unintended wear condition had generated a large volume of metal particles. The marrow samples were analyzed using stained histological sections and energy dispersive X-ray analysis. Intracellular metal alloy particles were detected in the bone marrow of the cranium, proximal humerus, sternum, ribs, lumbar vertebrae, and the iliac crest. The components previously revised for mechanical failure were confirmed to be the predominant source of the disseminated wear debris. Particles of either Ti, Ti6Al4V, CoCrMo, FeCrNi alloys, or BaSO4 were identified in 24 of the 25 marrow samples examined. The particles ranged in size from 50 nm (the limit of resolution of our technique) to 6 µm. Metallic wear particles generated by hip and knee arthroplasties can disseminate widely to hematopoietic bone marrow throughout the axial skeleton and proximal humerus, especially in cases with a history of severe wear. The hematopoietic microenvironment is potentially sensitive to metallic degradation products. However, actual medical sequelae from disseminated wear debris is a rare occurrence. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 1930-1936, 2019.