RESUMEN

The middle ear and mastoid spaces contain delicate and functionally important structures. Safe cholesteatoma surgery requires mastery of otologic anatomy as well as thorough preoperative investigation. Cholesteatoma can damage otologic structures on its own; however, there is also an opportunity for an iatrogenic complication given the distortion of anatomy by the disease process. This article explores complications that can occur during cholesteatoma surgery, guidance on how to avoid intraoperative complications, and treatment of such complications.

RESUMEN

To assess the effectiveness of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IFNM) compared to non-monitoring in the prevention of post-operative facial nerve palsy during superficial parotidectomy. Patients treated with curative intent for parotid gland tumors between January 2020 and January 2022 were included. The study population has been divided in 2 groups, based on IFNM: the group A included patients operated with IFNM, whilst group B was the non-monitoring group. A further classification focused on the pathologies and the surgeons' experience. The study group included 58 patients, 27 female and 31 male. The mean age was 45.7 yr (range 36-78). No statistical difference has been found in post-operative HB grade between group A and B. The analysis of patients affected by pleomorphic surface lobe adenomas of the parotid did not show a statistical difference in HB outcome (p > 0.05). The analysis of the effect of surgeons' experience in IFNM advantage did not show statistical difference for superficial parotid tumors. The results of the present study suggest that the use of IFNM during parotid surgery is not mandatory to preserve the VII nerve function, both in case of primary tumor and in case of recurrence, and even when surgery is performed by less experienced surgeon compared to those cases treated by a more experienced surgeon.

RESUMEN

The Rationale: This study describes a partial parotidectomy (PP) under local anaesthesia (LA) without regional block (LAwRB) assisted by electromyographic monitoring of the facial nerve, to consolidate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of these procedures without general anaesthesia (GA). Patient Concerns: An 82-year-old with a lump in the left parotid gland suspected for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) needed a histological examination to start chemotherapy. Diagnosis and Treatments: Because of multiple comorbidities, the authors performed a PP under LAwRB electromyographically guided by the NIM Vital (Medtronic)™. Outcomes: The procedure was quick and did not require conversion to GA. The histopathological examination confirmed the NHL. No haematoma, sialocoele, earlobe numbness and transient or permanent facial palsy were observed. Take-Away Lessons: The electrophysiologic monitoring of the facial nerve improves the efficacy, safety and feasibility of parotid surgery under LA, avoiding adverse effects of GA, need of regional block and reducing hospital stay.

RESUMEN

Does use of Facial nerve monitors during parotidectomy decrease incidence of facial paralysis/paresis without use of facial paresis? This study was done to compare the incidence, grade and risk factors of facial palsy in patients undergoing parotidectomy for benign parotid lesions with and without use of facial nerve monitor. This is a retrospective study. Eighty parotid patients operated for benign parotid lesions from 2013 to 2020 were retrospectively analysed. Demography details, history of the patients, history of addictions, clinical examination findings, investigation findings like the biopsy report, FNAC report, imaging i.e., CT / MRI / USG, use of intraoperative facial nerve monitor, time taken to identify the facial nerve, postoperative facial nerve palsy, facial nerve stimulation test and recovery time were analysed. Fifty patients were operated without use of facial nerve monitor, and 30 patients were operated using facial nerve monitor. Postoperative facial nerve complications were seen in 28 out of 80 patients (35%). Postoperative facial nerve complications were observed in 5 out of 30 patients (20%) in whom facial nerve monitoring was used. Marginal mandibular nerve palsy was observed in 4 patients and 1 patient had weakness of both marginal mandibular and orbital branches. While in postoperative facial nerve complications were observed in 25 out of 50 patients (50%), marginal mandibular nerve palsy was observed in 15 patients (40%), grade 3 facial palsy was observed in 3 out of 50 patients (6%), and grade 4 facial palsy were observed in 2 out of 50 patients (4%). The use of intraoperative FNM significantly lowered the incidence of paralysis.

RESUMEN

Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (FNM) has been widely accepted as an adjunct during parotid surgery to facilitate identification of the facial nerve (FN) main trunk, dissection of FN branches, confirmation of FN function integrity, detection of FN injury and prognostication of facial expression after tumor resection. Although the use of FNM in parotidectomy is increasing, little uniformity exists in its application from the literature. Thus, not only are the results of many studies difficult to compare but the value of FNM technology is also limited. The article reviews the current literature and proposes our standardized FNM procedures during parotid surgery, such as standards in FNM setup, standards in general anesthesia, standards in FNM procedures and application of stimulus currents, interpretation of electrophysiologic signals and prediction of the facial expression outcome and pre-/post-operative assessment of facial expressions. We hope that the FNM standardized procedures will provide greater uniformity, improve the quality of applications and contribute to future research.

RESUMEN

Petroclival meningiomas arise from the upper two-thirds of the clivus at the petroclival junction and are reached via various approaches. As petroclival meningiomas expand, they displace the brainstem and basilar artery toward the contralateral side. Because of their proximity to critical structures and deep skull base location, surgical treatment is challenging. Although several approaches have been introduced, their rationales vary. Herein, the authors demonstrate microsurgical resection of a large petroclival meningioma via a translabyrinthine approach combined with middle fossa craniotomy. For each approach, the pros and cons should be carefully evaluated based on the patient's presentation and lesion characteristics. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2022.1.FOCVID21253.

RESUMEN

The article presents the clinical case of supralabyrinthine petrous bone cholesteatoma. We have analyzed the preoperative examination of the patient for identification method of surgical treatment with preservation the facial nerve, improvement hearing function and reducing risk of recurrent cholesteatoma, perioperative findings and the end result of surgical treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This observational study investigated intraoperative electrophysiological changes and their correlation with postoperative facial expressions in parotidectomy patients with visual confirmation of facial nerve (FN) continuity. Maximal electromyography(EMG) amplitudes of the facial muscles corresponding to temporal, zygomatic, buccal and mandibular branches were compared before/after FN dissection, and facial function at four facial regions were evaluated before/after parotidectomy in 112 patients. Comparisons of 448 pairs of EMG signals revealed at least one signal decrease after FN dissection in 75 (67%) patients. Regional facial weakness was only found in 13 of 16 signals with >50% amplitude decreases. All facial dysfunctions completely recovered within 6 months. EMG amplitude decreases often occur after FN dissection. An amplitude decrease >50% in an FN branch is associated with a high incidence of dysfunction in the corresponding facial region. This study tries to establish a standard facial nerve monitoring (FNM) procedure and a proper facial function grading system for parotid surgery that will be useful for the future study of FNM in parotid surgery.

RESUMEN

Facial nerve injury is the most feared complication during parotid surgery. Intraoperative electromyographic nerve monitoring can be used to identify the facial nerve, map its course, identify surgical maneuvers detrimental to the nerve, and provide prognostic information. Data regarding outcomes with facial nerve monitoring are heterogeneous. In contrast, the incidence of permanent weakness has not been shown to be significantly affected by use of nerve monitoring. For revision surgery, studies show that monitored patients had (1) weakness that was less severe with quicker recovery and (2) shorter operative times compared with unmonitored patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Facial nerve monitoring (FNM) has evolved into a widely used adjunct for many surgical procedures along the course of the facial nerve. Even though majority opinion holds that FNM reduces the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury, there are few if any studies yielding high-level evidence and no practice guidelines on which clinicians can rely. Instead, a review of the literature and medicolegal cases reveals significant variations in methodology, training, and clinical indications. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review and expert opinion. METHODS: Given the lack of standard references to serve as a resource for FNM, we assembled a multidisciplinary group of experts representing more than a century of combined monitoring experience to synthesize the literature and provide a rational basis to improve the quality of patient care during FNM. RESULTS: Over the years, two models of monitoring have become well-established: 1) monitoring by the surgeon using a stand-alone device that provides auditory feedback of facial electromyography directly to the surgeon, and 2) a team, typically consisting of surgeon, technologist, and interpreting neurophysiologist. Regardless of the setting and the number of people involved, the reliability of monitoring depends on the integration of proper technical performance, accurate interpretation of responses, and their timely application to the surgical procedure. We describe critical steps in the technical set-up and provide a basis for context-appropriate interpretation and troubleshooting of recorded signals. CONCLUSIONS: We trust this initial attempt to describe best practices will serve as a basis for improving the quality of patient care while reducing inappropriate variations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:S1-S42, 2021.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We examined the incidence, risk factors, and recovery time for postoperative facial nerve paralysis in patients with benign parotid tumors and also investigated the usefulness of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (FNM). METHODS: Subjects were 902 patients with benign parotid tumors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for risk factors of postoperative facial nerve paralysis. We investigated the relationship between intraoperative FNM and postoperative facial nerve paralysis, and the recovery time for postoperative facial nerve paralysis according to tumor site. RESULTS: Postoperative facial nerve paralysis occurred in 179 (19.8%) of 902 patients. Among them, 15.1%, 15.8%, and 37.5% had tumors in the superficial lobe, lower pole, and deep lobe, respectively. Paralysis risk factors were deep tumors, large tumors, long operation times, extensive bleeding, and non-use of FNM. Multivariate analysis determined female patients, deep tumors, and long operation times as significant risk factors, and female patients and deep tumors had an odds ratio of nearly 2. Use of intraoperative FNM resulted in a significantly lower incidence of facial nerve paralysis and was particularly useful in patients with superficial lobe tumors. Time to recovery from facial nerve paralysis was 6 months in 88% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The incidence of paralysis should be kept as low as possible to enhance the postoperative quality of life of patients. The use of intraoperative FNM significantly lowered the incidence of paralysis in female patients with superficial tumors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Facial nerve injury remains the most severe complication of parotid gland surgery. However, the use of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IFNM) during parotid gland surgery among Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons continues to be a matter of debate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted including articles from 1970 to 2019 to try to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in preventing immediate and permanent postoperative facial nerve weakness in patients undergoing primary parotidectomy. Acceptable studies included controlled series that evaluated facial nerve function following primary parotidectomy with or without intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. RESULTS: Ten articles met inclusion criteria, with a total of 1069 patients included in the final meta-analysis. The incidence of immediate and permanent postoperative weakness following parotidectomy was significantly lower in the IFNM group compared to the unmonitored group (23.4% vs. 38.4%; p = 0.001) and (5.7% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.001) when all studies were included. However, when we analyze just prospective data, we are not able to find any significant difference. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that IFNM may decrease the risk of immediate post-operative and permanent facial nerve weakness in primary parotid gland surgery. However, due to the low evidence level, additional prospective-randomized trials are needed to determine if these results can be translated into improved surgical safety and improved patient satisfaction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: As large single-surgeon series in the literature are lacking, we sought to review a single-surgeon's experience with parotidectomy in an academic center, with a focused analysis of pathology, technique, and facial nerve (FN) weakness. Benchmark values for complications and operative times with routine trainee involvement and without continuous FN monitoring are offered. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent parotidectomy, performed by D. G. D., for benign and malignant disease between January 2004 and December 2018 at an academic center were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 924 parotidectomies, with adequate evaluatable data were identified. The majority of patients had benign tumors (70.9%). Partial/superficial parotidectomy was the most common approach (65.7%). Selective FN branch sacrifice was rare (12.3%), but significantly more common among patients with malignant pathology (33.8% vs 3.5% for benign, P < .0001). Among patients with intact FN, post-operative short- and long-term FN weaknesses were rare (6.5% and 1.7%, respectively). These rates were lower among patients with benign tumors (5.4% and 1.3%). Partial/superficial parotidectomy for benign tumors was associated with a low rate of short- and long-term FN weaknesses (2.7% and 0.9%). Mean OR time was 185 minutes. CONCLUSION: This is the largest single-surgeon series on parotidectomy, spanning 15 years. We demonstrate excellent long- and short-term FN paresis rates with acceptable operative times without regular use of continuous FN monitoring and with routine trainee involvement. These findings may provide valuable insight into parotid tumor pathology, FN outcomes, and feasibility and expectations of performing parotidectomy in an academic setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Facial nerve (FN) outcome has been improved by deciding upon the degree of vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection guided by intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IOFM). This study aimed to evaluate hearing and FN outcomes following IOFM-guided VS removal through a retrosigmoid approach (RS). METHODS: Between January 2015 and August 2017, 77 patients undergoing VS resection through RS, regardless of their preoperative hearing or tumor size, were included in this monocentric retrospective study. Total or near-/subtotal resection was decided intraoperatively according to IOFM. Partial resection was planned preoperatively. Pre- and postoperative FN function (House-Brackmann) and hearing level (AAO-HNS and Gardner-Robertson (GR) scales) were reported. Predictive factors for hearing preservation were analyzed according to a score developed to take into account pre-/postoperative hearing evolution. RESULTS: The mean extrameatal diameter was 17 ± 8.5 mm. VS resection was total, near-/subtotal, and partial in 71%, 21%, and 8% of cases, respectively. Postoperative grade I and II FN function was achieved in 91% of patients. Serviceable (A+B or GR I+II) hearing and hearing with intelligibility (A+B+C or GR I-III) were preserved in 30% and 43% of cases, respectively. In multivariate analysis, preoperative synchronized auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were the only predictive factor (p = 0.006) imparting a five times greater chance of hearing preservation. CONCLUSION: IOFM-guided VS excision through RS, whatever the VS size and hearing level, achieved a high rate of good postoperative FN function together with significant hearing preservation, and it should be used if hearing with some intelligibility is still present preoperatively, even in large VS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the role of facial nerve monitoring (FNM) for intraoperative decision making during otologic surgery and possible benefits beyond protecting facial nerve integrity. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study examines intraoperative FNM data and structured interviews collected during 52 otologic procedures. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Subjects include adults and children undergoing middle ear or mastoid surgery. Data include intraoperative neuromonitoring activity and structured interviews conducted with the operating surgeon immediately following surgery. RESULTS: Facial nerve stimulation was used to confirm the position of the nerve in 42 of 52 surgical procedures. In 26.9% of cases, the patient became "light" and moved under anesthesia, which was predicted by neuromonitoring 71.4% of the time. Through structured interviews, the operating surgeons reported the following. (1) The facial nerve took an unexpected anatomic course in 7.8% of patients and was difficult to identify in 39.2%. (2) The nerve was at increased risk of injury in 66.7% of cases due to chronic disease or previous surgery. (3) Among these high-risk cases, the monitor helped reduce the risk of nerve damage 100% of the time. (4) Neuromonitoring allowed the surgeon to operate faster 86.5% of the time, and (5) FNM allowed the resident to perform more of the operation 68.9% of the time. No patients experienced postoperative facial weakness. CONCLUSIONS: Beyond potentially protecting facial nerve integrity, this study identified additional benefits of FNM, including warning of patient movement during anesthesia, confirming facial nerve anatomic location, reducing operative time, and enhancing resident surgical experience.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Branchial cleft anomalies are common differential diagnosis of neck masses. However, depending on the origin (1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th arch), this pathology presents at different locations as cyst, sinus and fistula. Incomplete excision or incision and drainage of infected branchial cleft anomalies (cystic presentation) can lead to multiple recurrences. Appropriate radiology is imperative to make a correct diagnosis and to achieve complete excision to prevent recurrence. Our case series highlights the mode of presentation, appropriate radiology and management for each type of branchial cleft anomalies. Data of 27 patients with the diagnosis of branchial cleft anomaly and treated in the department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery in a tertiary care referral centre in last 5 years was analysed retrospectively. Demographic data in terms of age, sex, laterality, clinical presentation, duration of symptoms and radiological investigations if any were recorded. The mean age at presentation was 22.1 years in this series of 27 cases including six (22.2%) recurrent cases. Most common clinical presentation was discharging sinus (59.25%) followed by cystic neck swelling (33.3%). Second branchial cleft anomalies were commonest (51.8%) followed by first branchial cleft anomalies (29.6%). Appropriate radiology was available for 17 (62.9%) patients. Branchial cleft anomaly is an important differential diagnosis of neck mass. Appropriate radiology helps in complete excision and prevents recurrences. Recurrent cases pose surgical challenge owing to fibrosis from previous surgery which further increases the chances of incomplete excision.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether use of partial nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents, at a train-of-four level 1, compromise facial nerve monitoring during vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients undergoing VS resection were enrolled into a partial peripheral neuromuscular blockade group or free of neuromuscular blockade group. Stimulation threshold to elicit an electromyographic response amplitude of at least 100 µV was recorded at the proximal and distal facial nerve after VS removal. The proximal-to-distal ratio of amplitude of the orbicularis oculi and oris muscles was calculated. RESULTS: All patients successfully passed the electromyography monitoring test. Mean electrical stimulation thresholds were higher in the peripheral neuromuscular blockade group than in the free of neuromuscular blockade group (0.12 mA vs. 0.06 mA at proximal site, P = 0.001; 0.08 mA vs. 0.03 mA at distal site, P = 0.0002). The differences in median proximal-to-distal amplitude ratios were not statistically significant in both groups. There was a trend toward more patients needing phenylephrine. Recovery profiles were comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although mean stimulation threshold to elicit a response amplitude was higher in the peripheral neuromuscular blockade group than in the free of neuromuscular blockade group at the proximal site, the stimulation thresholds in both groups were sufficient for facial nerve monitoring in VS surgery, indicating no clinical difference in both groups.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The article presents the case report of infralabyrinthine petrous bone cholesteatoma. We have analyzed the preoperative examination of the patient for identification method of surgical treatment with preservation the facial nerve and reducing cholesteatoma risk, perioperative findings and the end result of surgical treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objectives: Iatrogenic facial nerve injury is one of the most feared complications of cochlear implantation. Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring is used as an adjunctive modality in a variety of neurotologic surgeries including cochlear implantation. With the lack of nerve monitoring, there is a theoretically higher risk of iatrogenic fallopian canal dehiscence with facial nerve exposure, particularly the mastoid portion, during cochlear implant surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of iatrogenic exposure of the facial nerve and its relation to the incidence of post-operative facial paralysis in the absence of facial nerve monitoring. Methods: This was a retrospective study. Medical charts of 307 patients who underwent cochlear implantation without facial nerve monitoring, from 2012 to 2017 were reviewed to identify cases with a reported iatrogenic defect over the mastoid facial nerve. The incidence of post-operative facial palsy was determined and compared to the incidence with the use of intra-operative monitoring which has been reported in the literature. Results: The incidence of iatrogenic dehiscence with facial nerve exposure was 46.58%. However, the incidence of post-operative facial palsy was only 2.1% which decreased to 0.72% in cases without injury of the facial neural sheath. This was not significantly different from the 0.73% rate reported in the literature with the use of intra-operative facial monitoring (P = 0.99). Conclusion: The incidence of iatrogenic facial nerve exposure during cochlear implantation may be relatively high. However, no additional risk of post-operative facial nerve paralysis was found, provided that the integrity of the neural sheath was preserved, even with the lack of intra-operative monitoring.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Iatrogenic facial nerve (FN) injury is one of the most feared complications of otologic surgery. Dehiscence of the bony covering of the FN within the temporal bone increases FN vulnerability to accidental injury. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the temporal bone is used preoperatively to assess middle ear and mastoid anatomy; however, it is unreliable for detecting facial canal dehiscence. In this study, our aim was to determine if preoperative percutaneous FN stimulation could predict middle ear facial canal dehiscence. Between January 2015 and February 2017, we performed preoperative HRCT and percutaneous FN stimulation on adult patients who underwent otologic surgery at our institution. Stimulation was performed with a monopolar probe placed on the skin over the stylomastoid foramen. Electrical stimuli ranged from 0 to 40 milliamperes (mA). Recordings were made from ipsilateral facial muscles. Dependent variables included threshold to compound muscle action potential (CMAP), threshold to maximum amplitude of CMAP, and maximum amplitude of CMAP for each muscle. A retrospective chart review was performed. Seventy patients met inclusion criteria. Of the 24 with an intraoperatively confirmed dehiscence, 10 were identified preoperatively by the attending surgeon on HRCT. Averages of the lowest recorded threshold to CMAP (5.1mA v. 9.1mA), and an average of the threshold to CMAP (8.9 mA. 11.8 mA) of dehiscent versus non-dehiscent nerves were significantly different (p < .05). In conclusion, percutaneous FN stimulation is a simple and cost-effective tool that can give the surgeon important preoperative information about FN anatomy.

Asunto(s)