RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis is a multi-factorial disease, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a critical risk factor in developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Cholesteryl-ester transfer-protein (CETP), synthesized by the liver, regulates LDL-C and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) through the bidirectional transfer of lipids. The novelty of CETP inhibitors (CETPis) has granted new focus towards increasing HDL-C, besides lowering LDL-C strategies. To date, five CETPis that are projected to improve lipid profiles, torcetrapib, dalcetrapib, evacetrapib, anacetrapib, and obicetrapib, have reached late-stage clinical development for ASCVD risk reduction. Early trials failed to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular occurrences. Given the advent of some recent large-scale clinical trials (ACCELERATE, HPS3/TIMI55-REVEAL Collaborative Group), conducting a meta-analysis is essential to investigate CETPis' efficacy. METHODS: We conducted a thorough search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that commenced between 2003 and 2023; CETPi versus placebo studies with a ≥6-month follow-up and defined outcomes were eligible. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality, all-cause mortality. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: stroke, revascularization, hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: Nine RCTs revealed that the use of a CETPi significantly reduced CVD-related mortality (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81-0.98; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%); the same studies also reduced the risk of MI (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86-0.98; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%), which was primarily attributed to anacetrapib. The use of a CETPi did not reduce the likelihood any other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis shows, for the first time, that CETPis are associated with reduced CVD-related mortality and MI.

RESUMEN

High levels of plasma cholesterol, especially high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), have been associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease. The cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) in plasma distributes cholesteryl esters between lipoproteins and increases LDL-C in plasma. Epidemiologically, decreased CETP activity has been associated with sustained cognitive performance during aging, longevity, and a lower risk of Alzheimer's disease. Thus, pharmacological CETP inhibitors could be repurposed for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease as they are safe and effective at lowering CETP activity and LDL-C. Although CETP is mostly expressed by the liver and secreted into the bloodstream, it is also expressed by astrocytes in the brain. Therefore, it is important to determine whether CETP inhibitors can enter the brain. Here, we describe the pharmacokinetic parameters of the CETP inhibitor evacetrapib in the plasma, liver, and brain tissues of CETP transgenic mice. We show that evacetrapib crosses the blood-brain barrier and is detectable in brain tissue 0.5 h after a 40 mg/kg i.v. injection in a non-linear function. We conclude that evacetrapib may prove to be a good candidate to treat CETP-mediated cholesterol dysregulation in Alzheimer's disease.

RESUMEN

Despite advances in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, most advanced CRC patients who experience disease progression after chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy face a situation in which there is no available medicine. Thus, new therapeutic drugs for CRC are urgently needed. Studies have shown that cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) has a vital role in tumor development and is a possible target for CRC therapy. We found that Evacetrapib, a CETP inhibitor, suppressed CRC cell growth by inhibiting the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway and activating the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway in CRC. Therefore, Evacetrapib displays an anti-cancer effect and is a possible option for treating CRC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is causally related to cardiovascular disease. Inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein with Evacetrapib may provide an additional treatment option for patients who do not reach their LDL-C goal with statins or patients who cannot tolerate statins. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Evacetrapib in patients with inadequately-controlled hypercholesterolemia and high cardiovascular risk. METHOD: A computer literature search for PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct was carried out from inception to 2019 and was updated from January 2019 till March 2021. We included only RCTs. Data were pooled as a mean difference in a random-effect model using the Mantel-Haenzel (M-H) method. We used Open Meta [Analyst] software (by the center of evidence-based medicine, Oxford University, UK). RESULTS: Five studies (n = 12,937 patients) reported in five articles were included in this meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate showed that LDL-C was significantly lower in the evacetrapib group than the placebo group (MD -34.07 mg/dL, 95% CI [-40.66, -27.49], p<0.0001). The pooled estimate showed that Apo-B was significantly lower in the evacetrapib130 mg group than the placebo group (MD -22.64 mg/dL, 95% CI [-30.70, -14.58], p<0.0001). HDL-C was significantly higher in the evacetrapib group over the placebo group (MD 93.31 mg/dL, 95% CI [56.07, 130.56], p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Current evidence from five RCTs (12,539 participants) suggests that evacetrapib has favorable outcomes in patients with inadequately-controlled Hypercholesterolemia and high cardiovascular risks. Evacetrapib could significantly increase the HDL and Apo-A1 levels and lower the LDL cholesterol and Apo-B levels with an acceptable safety profile.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) system moves cholesteryl esters (CE) from high density lipoproteins (HDL) to lower density lipoproteins, i.e. very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in exchange for triglycerides (TGs). This shuttle process will ultimately form complexes facilitating a bidirectional exchange of CE and TGs, the end process being CE delivery to catabolic sites. The CETP system is generally characteristic of higher animal species; lower species, not provided with this system, have higher and enlarged HDL enriched with apo E, suitable for tissue receptor interaction. Discovery of the CETP system has led to the development of agents interfering with CETP, thus elevating HDL-C and potentially preventing cardiovascular (CV) disease. Activation of CETP leads instead to reduced HDL-C levels, but also to an enhanced removal of CE from tissues. CETP antagonists are mainly small molecules (torcetrapib, anacetrapib, evacetrapib, dalcetrapib) and have provided convincing evidence of a HDL-C raising activity, but disappointing results in trials of CV prevention. In contrast, the CETP agonist probucol leads to HDL-C lowering followed by an increment of tissue cholesterol removal (reduction of xanthomas, xanthelasmas) and positive findings in secondary prevention trials. The drug has an impressive anti-inflammatory profile (markedly reduced interleukin-1ß expression). Newer agents, some of natural origin, have additional valuable pharmacodynamic properties. The pharmacological approach to the CETP system remains enigmatic, although the failure of CETP antagonists has dampened enthusiasm. Studies on the system, a crossroad for any investigation on cholesterol metabolism, have however provided crucial contributions and will still be confronting any scientist working on CV prevention.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The actions of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors (torcetrapib, dalcetrapib and evacetrapib) include increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but they do not reduce cardiovascular outcomes in subjects with high cardiovascular risk. Anacetrapib also inhibits CETP, increases HDL cholesterol and lowers low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Areas covered: This evaluation is of the REVEAL (Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Anacetrapib through Lipid Modification) trial, which was a cardiovascular outcomes trial with anacetrapib in subjects with high cardiovascular risk. Consideration is given as to whether increasing HDL cholesterol, lowering LDL cholesterol or other mechanisms/factors underlying the positive outcome with this CETP inhibitor. Expert opinion: After three years, the REVEAL trial with anacetrapib, demonstrated cardiovascular benefits, but not a reduction in coronary artery deaths. The reductions were not significant in years one and two. Thus, in my opinion, the benefits of anacetrapib were not major, and may not apply in 'real' world populations where adherence to medicines is lower than in REVEAL. Also, lowering LDL cholesterol and off-target mechanisms of anacetrapib may have contributed to any beneficial and/or toxic effects. Anacetrapib has a good safety profile.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Therapeutic interventions aimed at increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels in order to reduce the residual cardiovascular (CV) risk of optimally drug treated patients have not provided convincing results, so far. Transfer of cholesterol from extrahepatic tissues to the liver appears to be the major atheroprotective function of HDL, and an elevation of HDL levels could represent an effective strategy. Inhibition of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), raising HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) levels, reduces low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and apoB levels, thus offering a promising approach. Despite the beneficial influence on cholesterol metabolism, off-target effects and lack of reduction in CV events and mortality (with torcetrapib, dalcetrapib and evacetrapib) highlighted the complex mechanism of CETP inhibition. After the failure of the above mentioned inhibitors in phase III clinical development, possibly due to the short duration of the trials masking benefit, the secondary prevention REVEAL trial has recently shown that the inhibitor anacetrapib significantly raised HDL-C (+104%), reduced LDL-C (-18%), with a protective effect on major coronary events (RR, 0.91; 95%CI, 0.85-0.97; p = 0.004). Whether LDL-C lowering fully accounts for the CV benefit or if HDL-C-rise is a crucial factor still needs to be determined, although the reduction of non-HDL (-18%) and Lp(a) (-25%), should be also taken into account. In spite of the positive results of the REVEAL Study, Merck decided not to proceed in asking regulatory approval for anacetrapib. Dalcetrapib (Dal-GenE study) and CKD-519 remain the two molecules within this area still in clinical development.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The development of CETP (cholesteryl ester transfer protein) inhibitors has had a long and difficult course with 3 compounds failing in phase III clinical trials. Finally, the REVEAL (Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Anacetrapib through Lipid modification) trial has shown that the CETP inhibitor anacetrapib decreased coronary heart disease when added to statin therapy. Although the result is different to earlier studies, this is likely related to the size and duration of the trial. The benefit of anacetrapib seems to be largely explained by lowering of non-HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), rather than increases in HDL-C. Although the magnitude of benefit for coronary heart disease appeared to be moderate, in part this may have reflected aspects of the trial design. Anacetrapib treatment was associated with a small increase in blood pressure, but was devoid of major side effects and was also associated with a small reduction in diabetes mellitus. Treatment with CETP inhibitors, either alone or in combination with statins, could provide another option for patients with coronary disease who require further reduction in LDL (low-density lipoprotein) and non-HDL-C.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Increasing high-density lipoprotein(HDL) cholesterol levels predict improved cardiovascular outcomes. However, inhibiting cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) to increase HDL cholesterol, with the 'cetrapibs' (torcetrapib and dalcetrapib), did not improve cardiovascular clinical outcomes. Despite these findings, the clinical outcomes trial with evacetrapib continued. Areas covered: Treatment with evacetrapib increased the levels of HDL by ~130%, and decreased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by ~37%. However, The Assessment of Clinical Effects of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition with Evacetrapib in Patients at a High Risk for Vascular Outcomes (ACCELERATE) trial did not show reduced cardiovascular outcomes with this cetrapib. Evacetrapib may have failed because increasing HDL cholesterol may not be beneficial in the presence of coronary artery disease and/or it is possible that evacetrapib has toxic effects that counter any beneficial effects. Expert opinion: In addition to our understanding of the relationships between CETP, HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease being incomplete, recent meta-analysis evidence suggests that increasing HDL cholesterol does not improve cardiovascular outcomes in subjects taking statins, and this may explain the failure of evacetrapib. Also, the preclinical characteristics of the cetrapibs, especially off-target mechanisms, were not explored prior to clinical trial, and may have contributed to the failure of cetrapibs, including evacetrapib.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein by evacetrapib when added to atorvastatin may provide an additional treatment option for patients who do not reach their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal.Methods and Results:This multicenter, randomized, 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, outpatient, phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy of evacetrapib with atorvastatin in reducing LDL-C in 149 Japanese patients (evacetrapib/atorvastatin, n=53; ezetimibe/atorvastatin, n=50; placebo/atorvastatin, n=46) with primary hypercholesterolemia. The primary efficacy measure was percent change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C (ß quantification). Treatment with evacetrapib 130 mg daily for 12 weeks resulted in a statistically significant treatment difference of -25.70% compared with placebo in percentage decrease in LDL-C (95% CI: -34.73 to -16.68; P<0.001). Treatment with evacetrapib 130 mg also resulted in a statistically significant difference of 126.39% in the change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) compared with placebo (95% CI: 113.54-139.24; P<0.001). No deaths or serious adverse events were reported. Four patients (3 in the evacetrapib group and 1 in the ezetimibe group) discontinued due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Evacetrapib daily in combination with atorvastatin was superior to placebo in lowering LDL-C after 12 weeks, and resulted in a statistically significant increase of HDL-C compared with placebo. Also, no new safety risks were identified.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein with evacetrapib may provide an additional treatment option for patients who do not reach their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal with statins or patients who cannot tolerate statins.Methods and Results:This multicenter, randomized, 12-week, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, outpatient, phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy of evacetrapib in reducing LDL-C in 54 Japanese patients (27 evacetrapib, 27 placebo) with primary hypercholesterolemia. Primary efficacy measure was the percent change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C (ß quantification). Treatment with evacetrapib 130 mg once daily for 12 weeks resulted in statistically significant (P<0.001) change in LDL-C (ß quantification) compared with placebo. Least-squares mean percentage changes from baseline were -34.3% in the evacetrapib group vs. 0.0% in the placebo group. Treatment with evacetrapib 130 mg also resulted in a statistically significant (P<0.001) increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with placebo in mean percent change from baseline, with a least-squares mean difference of 124.0% (95% confidence interval: 104.6-143.5). No deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations because of adverse events were reported; 5 patients (18.5%) in the evacetrapib group and 7 patients (26.9%) in the placebo group experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily evacetrapib 130 mg monotherapy was superior to placebo in lowering LDL-C after 12 weeks. No new safety risks were identified.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of these studies was to evaluate the effects of evacetrapib on male and female fertility and on embryo-fetal development (EFD). METHODS: Evacetrapib, a potent and selective inhibitor of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), was administered daily by oral gavage starting 2 weeks (for female) or 4 weeks (for male) before mating, during cohabitation, and until necropsy in the male rat fertility study or through gestation day (GD) 17 in the female rat combined fertility/EFD study. For rabbit EFD studies, animals were dosed from GDs 7 to 19 or from 1 week before mating through GD 19. Dose levels of evacetrapib ranged from 60 to 600 mg/kg for rats and from 1 to 100 mg/kg/day for rabbits. RESULTS: Parental findings in rats included decreased body weight and food consumption and moribund euthanasia in animals given 600 mg/kg/day and decreased food consumption at 300 mg/kg/day. There were no adverse effects on estrus cycling, fertility indices, sperm parameters, maternal reproductive parameters, male reproductive tissue, or fetal viability, growth, or external/visceral morphology. An increase in the incidence of 14th rudimentary ribs, a minor, transient variation considered nonadverse, was the only significant developmental finding in rats given 600 mg/kg/day. Slight decreases in body weight and food consumption at 100 mg/kg/day were the only maternal effects observed in rabbits with no adverse developmental effects noted. CONCLUSION: No adverse effects on fertility or EFD were observed in rats at doses up to 600 mg/kg/day and no adverse effects on EFD were noted in rabbits at doses up to 100 mg/kg/day. Birth Defects Research 109:513-527, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evacetrapib, a potent and selective inhibitor of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), was under development for the treatment of cardiovascular (CV) disease. The purpose of this pre-postnatal study in rabbits was to evaluate the effects of evacetrapib on pregnancy, parturition, and lactation of the maternal animals and on the growth, viability, development, and reproductive performance of the first filial (F1) offspring. The rabbit is considered a relevant species for toxicity testing with evacetrapib as it demonstrates significant CETP expression, whereas mice and rats do not express significant levels of CETP. METHODS: Evacetrapib was administered daily by oral gavage from gestation day (GD) 7 through lactation day (LD) 41 at dose levels of 0, 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: There were no adverse effects on maternal survival, clinical signs, gestation length, parturition, and litter size. There were no effects on F1 clinical observations, body weight, sexual maturation, conditioned eye blink, functional observational battery, or pathology findings. Treatment-related decreases in F1 postnatal survival and equivocal reductions in F1 mating, fertility, and copulation/conception indices without changes in sperm parameters or pathology of reproductive organs were noted in F1 animals. CONCLUSIONS: The maternal no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) after evacetrapib administration in female rabbits was 100 mg/kg/day. Based on the decreased F1 postnatal survival and equivocal changes in F1 fertility, the NOAEL for F1 neonatal developmental was 30 mg/kg/day. Birth Defects Research 109:486-496, 2017.© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) is the largest medical congress in Europe for this area of research and took place this year in Barcelona, Spain. The ESC Congress 2017 gathered more than 30,000 registered participants from over 140 countries together to share their knowledge in all cardiovascular fields, from basic science to management and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. The congress comprised 5 days of science and education with over 11,000 abstracts submitted, 500 expert sessions and over 200 exhibiting companies, making it the prime meeting platform for the profession. This year's ESC Congress Spotlight was "40 years of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)." PCI is a nonsurgical procedure used to treat narrowing of the coronary arteries of the heart found in coronary artery disease.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: About 10,000 compounds will be tested for an individual drug to eventually reach the market. It might be helpful recapitulating previous failures and identifying the main factors of the disappointments. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the author(s) detailed the 7 cardiovascular compounds discontinued after reaching animal studies or Phase I-III clinical trials during 2015. Meanwhile, the reasons for these discontinuations were reported. Among these drugs, most discontinuations (6 drugs) were attributed to lack of efficacy. In general, failures due to lack of efficacy and safety demonstrate the need for the development of more predictive animal models. However, recent related studies showed that the absence of toxicity in animals provided little or virtually no evidential weight that adverse drug reactions would also be absent in humans. In this case, microdosing and collaborating more closely with biotech companies may be the better choices to improve the success ratio. EXPERT OPINION: Future researches may benefit from the seven developments and investigators conducting similar studies may learn from these failures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of increased gastric pH on exposure to evacetrapib, a cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor evaluated for the treatment of atherosclerotic heart disease. DESIGN: Open-label, two-treatment, two-period, fixed-sequence crossover study. SETTING: Clinical research unit. SUBJECTS: Thirty-four healthy subjects. INTERVENTION: In period 1, subjects received a single oral dose of evacetrapib 130 mg on day 1, followed by 7 days of analysis for evacetrapib plasma concentrations. In period 2, subjects received a once/day oral dose of omeprazole 40 mg on days 8-20, with a single oral dose of evacetrapib 130 mg administered 2 hours after the omeprazole dose on day 14, followed by 7 days of pharmacokinetic sampling. Subjects were discharged on day 21 and returned for a follow-up visit at least 14 days after the last dose of evacetrapib in period 2. Gastric pH was measured before subjects received each evacetrapib dose. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from plasma concentration-time data and compared between periods 1 and 2. Geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. The mean age of the 34 subjects was 40.9 years; mean body mass index was 27.2 kg/m(2) . Omeprazole treatment increased mean gastric pH across all subjects by 2.80 and increased evacetrapib area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) and maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax ) by 15% (90% CI -2 to 35) and 30% (90% CI 3-63), respectively. For both parameters, the upper bound of the 90% CI of the ratio of geometric least-squares means exceeded 1.25 but was less than 2, indicating a weak interaction. To assess the effect of gastric pH on subjects who responded best to omeprazole treatment, the analyses were repeated to include only the 22 subjects whose predose gastric pH was 3.0 or lower in period 1 and 4.0 or higher in period 2. In this subpopulation, mean gastric pH increased by 4.15 during omeprazole treatment, and evacetrapib AUC0-∞ and Cmax increased by 22% (90% CI 4-42) and 35% (90% CI 1-80), respectively. Despite the small mathematical differences between the analyses, the overall effect in both was a minimal increase in evacetrapib exposure. Of 35 adverse events reported during the study, 4 (11.4%) were considered to be treatment-related, and most were mild in severity. CONCLUSION: The impact of increased gastric pH on evacetrapib pharmacokinetics would not be expected to be clinically relevant. The magnitude of change in pH did not affect the degree of the interaction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors substantially increase the concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), which may have a possible beneficial effect for cardiovascular disease risk reduction. AREAS COVERED: Current data regarding the effects of CETP inhibitors on cardiovascular disease risk and possible mechanisms for their effects and safety are presented in this review. Expert commentary: The first CETP inhibitor, torcetrapib, was discontinued because of increased off-target adverse effects (increased serum aldosterone and blood pressure levels). The development program of dalcetrapib and evacetrapib, which were not associated with increased blood pressure, was terminated due to futility (insufficient efficacy) concerning cardiovascular outcomes. Although the failure of torcetrapib has been attributed to specific off-target effects, there are some common characteristics between CETP inhibitors pointing to the possibility that certain adverse effects may be class-specific. The newer CETP inhibitors anacetrapib and TA-8995 have promising effects on lipid profile and metabolism (increase of HDL-C and reduction of both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) levels), but their cardiovascular effects and safety profile have not yet been confirmed in large outcome trials.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Potent CETP inhibitors reduce plasma concentrations of atherogenic lipoprotein biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor evacetrapib, as monotherapy or with statins, on atherogenic apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins in mildly hypercholesterolemic patients. METHODS: VLDL and LDL particle concentrations and sizes (using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy) and lipoprotein(a) concentration (using nephelometry) were measured at baseline and week 12 in a placebo-controlled trial of 393 patients treated with evacetrapib as monotherapy (30 mg/d, 100 mg/d, or 500 mg/d) or in combination with statins (100 mg plus simvastatin 40 mg/d, atorvastatin 20 mg/d, or rosuvastatin 10 mg/d; Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01105975). RESULTS: Evacetrapib monotherapy resulted in significant placebo-adjusted dose-dependent decreases from baseline in Lp(a) (up to -40% with evacetrapib 500 mg), total LDL particle (LDL-P) (up to -54%), and small LDL particle (sLDL) (up to -95%) concentrations. Compared to statin alone, coadministration of evacetrapib and statins also resulted in significant reduction from baseline in Lp(a) (-31%), LDL-P (-22%), and sLDL (-60%) concentrations. The percentage of patients with concentrations above optimal concentrations for LDL-P (>1000 nmol/L) and sLDL (>600 nmol/L) decreased from 88% and 55% at baseline, respectively, to 20% and 12% at week 12, for patients treated with evacetrapib plus statins. Evacetrapib, alone or with statins, significantly increased LDL-P size. CONCLUSIONS: Evacetrapib, as monotherapy or with statins, significantly reduces the concentrations of atherogenic apoB-containing lipoproteins, including Lp(a), LDL-P, and sLDL.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of a single 130-mg evacetrapib dose. METHODS: Two open-label, parallel-design studies in males and females with normal hepatic function or Child-Pugh mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment, or with normal renal function or severe renal impairment. Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from plasma concentration-time data. Evacetrapib safety and tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were comparable between controls and mildly hepatically impaired subjects. Geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was greater, half-life (t1/2) was longer, and maximum concentration (Cmax) was lower in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment than in controls. Apparent clearance (CL/F) did not differ between controls and those with mild hepatic impairment, but CL/F decreased for moderate and severe impairment. Spearman correlation coefficient showed no relationship between CL/F and Child-Pugh score. In the renal study, AUC and t1/2 were similar between groups, while Cmax was 15 % lower in subjects with severe impairment. CL/F in severely renally impaired subjects differed by <6 % from that in controls. Spearman correlation coefficient showed no apparent relationship between CL/F and estimated creatinine clearance or glomerular filtration rate. Neither study noted changes in clinical laboratory parameters or clinically significant findings. Adverse event incidence was low, and all were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSION: Evacetrapib exposure did not differ between mild hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function, but increased along the progression from mild to moderate to severe hepatic impairment. Severe renal impairment did not affect evacetrapib exposure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Physicochemical properties underlie all aspects of drug action and are critical for solubility, permeability and successful formulation. Specific physicochemical properties shown to be relevant to oral drugs are size, lipophilicity, ionisation, hydrogen bonding, polarity, aromaticity and shape. The rule of 5 (Ro5) and subsequent studies have raised awareness of the importance of compound quality amongst bioactive molecules. Lipophilicity, probably the most important physical property of oral drugs, has on average changed little over time in oral drugs, until increases in drugs published after 1990. In contrast other molecular properties such as average size have increased significantly. Factors influencing property inflation include the targets pursued, where antivirals frequently violate the Ro5, risk/benefit considerations, and variable drug discovery practices. The compounds published in patents from the pharmaceutical industry are on average larger, more lipophilic and less complex than marketed oral drugs. The variation between individual companies' patented compounds is due to different practices and not to the targets pursued. Overall, there is demonstrable physical property attrition in moving from patents to candidate drugs to marketed drugs. The pharmaceutical industry's recent poor productivity has been due, in part, to progression of molecules that are unable to unambiguously test clinical efficacy, and attrition can therefore be improved by ensuring candidate drug quality is 'fit for purpose.' The combined ligand efficiency (LE) and lipophilic ligand efficiency (LLE) values of many marketed drugs are optimised relative to other molecules acting at the same target. Application of LLE in optimisation can help identify improved leads, even with challenging targets that seem to require lipophilic ligands. Because of their targets, some projects may need to pursue 'beyond Ro5' physicochemical space; such projects will require non-standard lead generation and optimisation and should not dominate in a well-balanced portfolio. Compound quality is controllable by lead selection and optimisation and should not be a cause of clinical failure.

Asunto(s)