RESUMEN

In a cardiac output (CO) sub-study of the Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery (RELIEF) trial, it was shown that restrictive fluid management was associated with lower cardiac index at the end of surgery. However, the association of the fluid protocol with intraoperative blood pressure was less clear. This paper primarily compares rates of hypotension between the two fluid regimens. The haemodynamic effects of these protocols may increase our understanding of perioperative fluid prescription. Using a data set of arterial pressure and cardiac output measurements, this observational cohort study primarily compares intraoperative hypotension rates defined by a mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg between liberal and restrictive fluid protocols. Secondary analyses explore predictors of invasive mean arterial pressure and doppler-derived cardiac output, including fluid volume regimens and surgical duration. 105 patients had a combined total of 835 haemodynamic data capture events from the beginning to the end of the surgery. Here we report that a restrictive regimen is not associated with a greater proportion of participants who experience at least one episode of hypotension than the liberal regimen 64.1% vs. 61.5% (mean difference 2.6%, 95% CI - 15.9% to 21%, p = 0.78). Duration of surgery was associated with an increased risk of hypotension (OR 1.05, 1 to 1.1, p = 0.038). A fluid restriction protocol compared to liberal fluid administration is not associated with lower blood pressure.

Asunto(s)

Abdomen , Fluidoterapia , Hipotensión , Humanos , Hipotensión/etiología , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Abdomen/cirugía , Anciano , Gasto Cardíaco , Hemodinámica , Presión Sanguínea , Adulto

RESUMEN

Objective: This study investigated the performance among four cardiac output (CO) monitoring techniques in comparison with the reference method intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution (iPATD) and their ability to diagnose fluid responsiveness (FR) during a modified passive leg raise (PLRM) maneuver in isoflurane-anesthetized dogs undergoing acute blood volume manipulations. The study also examined the simultaneous effect of performing the PLRM on dynamic variables such as stroke distance variation (SDV), peak velocity variation (PVV), and stroke volume variation (SVV). Study design: Prospective, nonrandomized, crossover design. Study animals: Six healthy male Beagle dogs. Methods: The dogs were anesthetized with propofol and isoflurane and mechanically ventilated under neuromuscular blockade. After instrumentation, they underwent a series of sequential, nonrandomized steps: Step 1: baseline data collection; Step 2: removal of 33 mL kg-1 of circulating blood volume; Step 3: blood re-transfusion; and Step 4: infusion of 20 mL kg-1 colloid solution. Following a 10-min stabilization period after each step, CO measurements were recorded using esophageal Doppler (EDCO), transesophageal echocardiography (TEECO), arterial pressure waveform analysis (APWACO), and electrical cardiometry (ECCO). Additionally, SDV, PVV, and SVV were recorded. Intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution (iPATDCO) measurements were also recorded before, during, and after the PLRM maneuver. A successful FR diagnosis made using a specific test indicated that CO increased by more than 15% during the PLRM maneuver. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance for repeated measures with post hoc Tukey test, linear regression, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρc), and Bland-Altman analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: All techniques detected a reduction in CO (p < 0.001) during hemorrhage and an increase in CO after blood re-transfusion and colloid infusion (p < 0.001) compared with baseline. During hemorrhage, CO increases with the PLRM maneuver were as follows: 33% for iPATD (p < 0.001), 19% for EC (p = 0.03), 7% for APWA (p = 0.97), 39% for TEE (p < 0.001), and 17% for ED (p = 0.02). Concurrently, decreases in SVV, SDV, and PVV values (p < 0.001) were also observed. The percentage error for TEE, ED, and EC was less than 30% but exceeded 55% for APWA. While TEECO and ECCO slightly underestimated iPATDCO values, EDCO and APWACO significantly overestimated iPATDCO values. TEE and EC exhibited good and acceptable agreement with iPATD. However, CO measurements using all four techniques and iPATD did not differ before, during, and after PLRM at baseline, blood re-transfusion, and colloid infusion. Conclusion and clinical relevance: iPATD, EC, TEE, and ED effectively assessed FR in hypovolemic dogs during the PLRM maneuver, while the performance of APWA was unacceptable and not recommended. SVV, SDV, and PVV could be used to monitor CO changes during PLRM and acute blood volume manipulations, suggesting their potential clinical utility.

RESUMEN

Eighty percent of brain-dead (BD) organ donors develop hypotension and are frequently hypovolemic. Fluid resuscitation in a BD donor is controversial. We have previously published our 4-h goal-directed stroke volume (SV)-based fluid resuscitation protocol which significantly decreased time on vasopressors and increased transplanting four or more organs. The SV was measured by pulse-contour analysis (PCA) or an esophageal doppler monitor, both of which are invasive. Thoracic bioreactance (BR) is a non-invasive portable technology that measures SV but has not been studied in BD donors. We performed a randomized prospective comparative study of BR versus PCA technology in our fluid resuscitation protocol in BD donors. Eighty-four donors (53.1%) were randomized to BR and 74 donors to PCA (46.8%). The two groups were well matched based on 24 demographic, social, and initial laboratory factors, without any significant differences between them. There was no difference in the intravenous fluid infused over the 4-h study period [BR 2271 ± 823 vs. PCA 2230 ± 962 mL; p = .77]. There was no difference in the time to wean off vasopressors [BR 108.8 ± 61.8 vs. PCA 150.0 ± 68 min p = .07], nor in the number of donors off vasopressors at the end of the protocol [BR 16 (28.6%) vs. PCA 15 (29.4%); p = .92]. There was no difference in the total number of organs transplanted per donor [BR 3.25 ± 1.77 vs. PCA 3.22 ± 1.75; p = .90], nor in any individual organ transplanted. BR was equivalent to PCA in clinical outcomes and provides a simple, non-invasive, portable technology to monitor fluid resuscitation in organ donors.

Asunto(s)

Objetivos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Encéfalo , Muerte Encefálica , Estudios Prospectivos , Volumen Sistólico , Donantes de Tejidos

RESUMEN

Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is usually recommended in patients undergoing major surgery and is essential in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. This fluid regimen is usually guided by dynamic hemodynamic parameters and aims to optimize patients' cardiac output to maximize oxygen delivery to their vital organs. While many studies have shown that GDFT benefits patients perioperatively and can decrease postoperative complications, there is no consensus on which dynamic hemodynamic parameters to guide GDFT with. Furthermore, there are many commercialized hemodynamic monitoring systems to measure these dynamic hemodynamic parameters, and each has its pros and cons. This review will discuss and review the commonly used GDFT dynamic hemodynamic parameters and hemodynamic monitoring systems.

Asunto(s)

Objetivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Hemodinámica , Fluidoterapia/métodos

RESUMEN

The objective of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility of a study comparing the efficacy of an esophageal Doppler monitor (EDM)-based fluid therapy algorithm with a heart rate (HR)- and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)-based algorithm in reducing hypotension and fluid load in anesthetized dogs. Client-owned dogs undergoing general anesthesia for surgical procedures were randomized to two groups. An EDM probe for monitoring blood flow in the descending aorta was placed in each dog before receiving a crystalloid bolus (5 mL/kg) over 5 min. Fluids were repeated in case of fluid responsiveness defined by increasing Velocity Time Integral (VTI) ≥ 10% in group EDM and by decreasing HR ≥ 5 beats/min and/or increasing MAP ≥ 3 mmHg in group standard. The feasibility outcomes included the proportion of dogs completing the study and the clinical applicability of the algorithms. The clinical outcomes were the total administered fluid volume and the duration of hypotension defined as MAP < 60 mmHg. Data was compared between groups with Mann-Whitney U-test. p < 0.05 were deemed significant. Of 25 dogs screened, 14 completed the study (56%). There were no differences in the proportion of recorded time spent in hypotension in group standard [2 (0-39)% (median (range))] and EDM [0 (0-63) %, p = 1], or the total volume of fluids [standard 8 (5-14) mL/kg/h, EDM 11 (4-20) mL/kg/h, p = 0.3]. This study declined the feasibility of a study comparing the impact of two newly developed fluid therapy algorithms on hypotension and fluid load in their current form. Clinical outcome analyses were underpowered and no differences in treatment efficacy between the groups could be determined. The conclusions drawn from this pilot study provide important information for future study designs.

RESUMEN

Multi-beat analysis (MBA) of the radial arterial pressure (AP) waveform is a new method that may improve cardiac output (CO) estimation via modelling of the confounding arterial wave reflection. We evaluated the precision and accuracy using the trending ability of the MBA method to estimate absolute CO and variations (ΔCO) during hemodynamic challenges. We reviewed the hemodynamic challenges (fluid challenge or vasopressors) performed when intra-operative hypotension occurred during non-cardiac surgery. The CO was calculated offline using transesophageal Doppler (TED) waveform (COTED) or via application of the MBA algorithm onto the AP waveform (COMBA) before and after hemodynamic challenges. We evaluated the precision and the accuracy according to the Bland & Altman method. We also assessed the trending ability of the MBA by evaluating the percentage of concordance with 15% exclusion zone between ΔCOMBA and ΔCOTED. A non-inferiority margin was set at 87.5%. Among the 58 patients included, 23 (40%) received at least 1 fluid challenge, and 46 (81%) received at least 1 bolus of vasopressors. Before treatment, the COTED was 5.3 (IQR [4.1-8.1]) l min-1, and the COMBA was 4.1 (IQR [3-5.4]) l min-1. The agreement between COTED and COMBA was poor with a 70% percentage error. The bias and lower and upper limits of agreement between COTED and COMBA were 0.9 (CI95 = 0.82 to 1.07) l min-1, -2.8 (CI95 = -2.71 to-2.96) l min-1 and 4.7 (CI95 = 4.61 to 4.86) l min-1, respectively. After hemodynamic challenge, the percentage of concordance (PC) with 15% exclusion zone for ΔCO was 93 (CI97.5 = 90 to 97)%. In this retrospective offline analysis, the accuracy, limits of agreements and percentage error between TED and MBA for the absolute estimation of CO were poor, but the MBA could adequately track induced CO variations measured by TED. The MBA needs further evaluation in prospective studies to confirm those results in clinical practice conditions.

Asunto(s)

Hemodinámica , Arteria Radial , Gasto Cardíaco , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Termodilución/métodos

RESUMEN

Background: Dynamic preload parameters such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) have widely been used as accurate predictors for fluid responsiveness in patients under mechanical ventilation. To circumvent the limitation of decreased cyclic change of intrathoracic pressure, we performed an intermittent PEEP challenge test to evaluate whether PPV or SVV can predict fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation (OLV). Methods: Forty patients undergoing OLV were analyzed. Baseline hemodynamic variables including PPV and SVV and respiratory variables were recorded after chest opening in lateral position under OLV (T1). Five minutes after application of PEEP 10 cmH2O, the parameters were recorded (T2). Thereafter, PEEP was withdrawn to 0 cmH2O for 5 minutes (T3), and fluid loading was performed with balanced crystalloid solution 6 mL/kg of ideal body weight for 5 minutes. Five minutes after completion of fluid loading, all variables were recorded (T4). The patient was classified as fluid responder if SV increased ≥10% after fluid loading and as non-responder if SV increased <10%. Results: Prediction of fluid responsiveness was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Change in stroke volume variation (ΔSVV) showed AUC of 0.9 (P < 0.001), 95% CI = 0.82-0.99, sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 82% for discrimination of fluid responsiveness. Change in pulse pressure variation (ΔPPV) showed AUC of 0.88 (P < 0.001), 95% CI = 0.78-0.97, sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 72% in predictability of fluid responsiveness. Cardiac index and stroke volume were well maintained after PEEP challenge in non-responders while they increased in responders. Conclusions: ΔPPV and ΔSVV induced by PEEP challenge are reliable parameters to predict fluid responsiveness as well as very good predictors of fluid unresponsiveness during OLV.

Asunto(s)

Fluidoterapia/métodos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/diagnóstico , Ventilación Unipulmonar/efectos adversos , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Pulmonares/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ventilación Unipulmonar/métodos , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Pulmonares/métodos , Curva ROC , Volumen Sistólico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recruitment maneuvers may be used during anesthesia as part of perioperative protective ventilation strategy. However, the hemodynamic effect of recruitment maneuvers remain poorly documented in this setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study performed in operating theatre including patients scheduled for major vascular surgery. Patients were monitored with invasive arterial pressure and esophageal doppler. After induction of general anesthesia, before surgery began, preload optimization based on stroke volume (SV) variation following fluid challenge was performed. Then, an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) through stepwise increase in positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was performed. Hemodynamic data were noted before, during, and after the alveolar recruitment maneuver. RESULTS: ARM through stepwise increase in PEEP and CPAP were applied in 22 and 14 preload independent patients, respectively. Relative changes in SV during ARMs were significantly greater in the ARMCPAP group (-39 ± 20%) as compared to the ARMPEEP group (-15 ± 22%; P = 0.002). The difference (95% CI) in relative decrease in SV between ARMCPAP and ARMPEEP groups was -24% (-38 to -9; P = 0.001). Changes in arterial pressure, cardiac index, pulse pressure variation, peak velocity, and corrected flow time measures were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: During anesthesia, in preload independent patients, ARMs through CPAP resulted in a significantly greater decrease in SV than stepwise increase in PEEP. During anesthesia, ARM should be used cautiously.

RESUMEN

Septic shock in children is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Its management is time-sensitive and must be aggressive and target oriented. The use of clinical assessment alone to differentiate between cold and warm shock and to select the appropriate inotropic and vasoactive medications is fraught with errors. Semi-quantitative and quantitative assessment of the preload, contractility and afterload using non-invasive tools has been suggested, in conjunction with clinical and laboratory assessment, to direct shock management and select between vasopressors, vasodilators and inotropes or a combination of these drugs. This review aims to describe non-invasive tools to assess the hemodynamic status in septic shock including echocardiography, trans-thoracic/trans-esophageal Doppler and electrical cardiometry. As septic shock is a dynamic condition that changes markedly overtime, frequent or continuous measurement of the cardiac output (CO), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and other hemodynamic parameters using the above-mentioned tools is essential to personalize the treatment and adapt it over time. The different combinations of blood pressure, CO and SVR serve as a pathophysiological framework to manage fluid therapy and titrate inotropic and vasoactive drugs. Near infrared spectroscopy is introduced as a non-invasive method to measure end organ perfusion and assess the response to treatment.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Lung-protective ventilation strategy and prone positioning are the strategies practiced to manage patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility (dIVC) Index has been used for predicting fluid responsiveness (FR) in supine position. We conducted this study to observe the utility of dIVC in prone position in ARDS patients and compare it with esophageal Doppler (ED) parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After ethical clearance, a prospective observational pilot study was conducted in a 12-bedded tertiary care hospital. Adult ARDS patients who were treated with prone ventilation were included. Informed consent was taken from the relatives. IVC was visualized through right lateral approach both in supine and prone positions. We compared IVC distensibility and ED parameters, first in 45° head up and then in prone. FR was defined as an increase in the stroke volume of ≥15% as measured by ED. The patients with dIVC >18% were assumed to be fluid responsive. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 20. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. ARDS was (mean P/F ratio 116.64 ± 44.76) mostly due to pulmonary etiology. Out of 25 patients, 10 patients were fluid responsive based on dIVC (cutoff >18%) in supine position. When compared to ED values after passive leg raising, dIVC had a sensitivity and specificity of 77.78% and 81.25%, respectively, in predicting FR with a moderate-to-absolute agreement between the two methods. IVC distensibility showed statistically significant negative correlation with corrected flow time (FTc) values both in supine and in prone positions. CONCLUSION: IVC variability can be observed in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients in prone position. Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility correlates with flow time in both the positions.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Bioreactance is a non-invasive technology for measuring stroke volume (SV) in the operating room and critical care setting. We evaluated how the NICOM® bioreactance device performed against the CardioQ® esophageal Doppler monitor in patients undergoing major abdominal-pelvic surgery, focusing on the effect of different hemodynamic interventions. METHODS: SVNICOM and SVODM were simultaneously measured intraoperatively, including before and after interventions including fluid challenge, vasopressor boluses, peritoneal gas insufflation/removal, and Trendelenburg/reverse Trendelenburg patient positioning. RESULTS: A total of 768 values were collected from 21 patients. Pre- and post-intervention measures were recorded on 155 occasions. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of 8.6 ml and poor precision with wide limits of agreement (54 and -37 ml) and a percentage error of 50.6%. No improvement in precision was detected after taking into account repeated measurements for each patient (bias: 8 ml; limits of agreement: 74 and -59 ml). Concordance between changes in SVNICOM and SVODM before and after interventions was also poor: 78.7% (all measures), 82.4% (after vasopressor administration), and 74.3% (after fluid challenge). Using Doppler SV as the reference technique, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve assessing the ability of the NICOM device to predict fluid responsiveness was 0.81 (0.7-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing major abdomino-pelvic surgery, SV values obtained by NICOM showed neither clinically or statistically acceptable agreement with those obtained by esophageal Doppler. Although, in the setting of this study, bioreactance technology cannot reliably replace esophageal Doppler monitoring, its accuracy for predicting fluid responsiveness was higher, up to approximately 80%. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Observational study.

Asunto(s)

Ecocardiografía Doppler/métodos , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Volumen Sistólico , Abdomen/cirugía , Anciano , Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC

RESUMEN

Over the last decade, the way to monitor hemodynamics at the bedside has evolved considerably in the intensive care unit as well as in the operating room. The most important evolution has been the declining use of the pulmonary artery catheter along with the growing use of echocardiography and of continuous, real-time, minimally or totally non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring techniques. This article, which is the result of an agreement between authors belonging to the Cardiovascular Dynamics Section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, discusses the advantages and limits of using such techniques with an emphasis on their respective place in the hemodynamic management of critically ill patients with hemodynamic instability.

Asunto(s)

Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Gasto Cardíaco/fisiología , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/tendencias , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Termodilución/métodos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have compared perioperative esophageal doppler monitoring (EDM) guided intravascular volume replacement strategies with conventional clinical volume replacement in surgical patients. The use of the EDM within hemodynamic algorithms is called 'goal directed hemodynamic therapy' (GDHT). METHODS: Meta-analysis of the effects of EDM guided GDHT in adult non-cardiac surgery on postoperative complications and mortality using PRISMA methodology. A systematic search was performed in Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (last update, March 2015). INCLUSION CRITERIA: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in which perioperative GDHT was compared to other fluid management. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Overall complications. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Mortality; number of patients with complications; cardiac, renal and infectious complications; incidence of ileus. Studies were subjected to quantifiable analysis, pre-defined subgroup analysis (stratified by surgery, type of comparator and risk); pre-defined sensitivity analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). RESULTS: Fifty six RCTs were initially identified, 15 fulfilling the inclusion criteria, including 1,368 patients. A significant reduction was observed in overall complications associated with GDHT compared to other fluid therapy (RR=0.75; 95%CI: 0.63-0.89; P=0.0009) in colorectal, urological and high-risk surgery compared to conventional fluid therapy. No differences were found in secondary outcomes, neither in other subgroups. The impact on preventing the development of complications in patients using EDM is high, causing a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 50% for a number needed to treat (NNT)=6. CONCLUSIONS: GDHT guided by EDM decreases postoperative complications, especially in patients undergoing colorectal surgery and high-risk surgery. However, no differences versus restrictive fluid therapy and in intermediate-risk patients were found.

Asunto(s)

Hemodinámica , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Fluidoterapia , Objetivos , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several minimally invasive techniques for cardiac output monitoring such as the esophageal Doppler (ED) and arterial pulse pressure waveform analysis (APPWA) have been shown to improve surgical outcomes compared with conventional clinical assessment (CCA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these techniques in high-risk abdominal surgery from the perspective of the French public health insurance fund. METHODS: An analytical decision model was constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of ED, APPWA, and CCA. Effectiveness data were defined from meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials. The clinical end points were avoidance of hospital mortality and avoidance of major complications. Hospital costs were estimated by the cost of corresponding diagnosis-related groups. RESULTS: Both goal-directed therapy strategies evaluated were more effective and less costly than CCA. Perioperative mortality and the rate of major complications were reduced by the use of ED and APPWA. Cost reduction was mainly due to the decrease in the rate of major complications. APPWA was dominant compared with ED in 71.6% and 27.6% and dominated in 23.8% and 20.8% of the cases when the end point considered was "major complications avoided" and "death avoided," respectively. Regarding cost per death avoided, APPWA was more likely to be cost-effective than ED in a wide range of willingness to pay. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac output monitoring during high-risk abdominal surgery is cost-effective and is associated with a reduced rate of hospital mortality and major complications, whatever the device used. The two devices evaluated had negligible costs compared with the observed reduction in hospital costs. Our comparative studies suggest a larger effect with APPWA that needs to be confirmed by further studies.

Asunto(s)

Abdomen/cirugía , Presión Arterial , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/economía , Gasto Cardíaco , Ecocardiografía Doppler/economía , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Fluidoterapia/economía , Costos de Hospital , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/economía , Anciano , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/instrumentación , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Árboles de Decisión , Ecocardiografía Doppler/instrumentación , Francia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/instrumentación , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Método de Montecarlo , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sector Público/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Less-invasive hemodynamic monitoring (eg, esophageal doppler monitoring [EDM] and arterial pressure contour analysis, FloTrac) is increasingly used as an alternative to pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU). HYPOTHESIS: The decrease in use of PACs is not associated with increased mortality. METHODS: Five-year retrospective review of 1894 hemodynamically monitored patients admitted to 3 surgical ICUs in a university-affiliate, tertiary care urban hospital. Data included the number of admissions, diagnosis-related group discharge case mix, length of stay, insertion of monitoring devices (PAC, EDM, and FloTrac probes), administered intravenous vasoactive agents (ß-predominant agonists--dobutamine, epinephrine, and dopamine; vasopressors--norepinephrine and phenylephrine), and mortality. Data from hospital administrative databases were compiled to create patient characteristic and monitoring variables across a 5-year time period, 2005 to 2009 inclusive. Chi-square for independent proportions, 1-way analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used; tests for trend were conducted. An α level of .05 was considered significant. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v14 was used for all statistical testing. RESULTS: There was a significant change in the type of hemodynamic monitors inserted in 2 of the 3 surgical ICUs (in the general surgery and neurointensive care but not in the cardiac ICU) from PACs to less-invasive devices (FloTrac or EDM) during the 5-year study period (P < .001). There was no change in mortality rate over the time period (P = .492). There was an overall increase in the proportion of monitored patients who received intravenous vasoactive agents (P < .001) with a progressive shift from ß-agonists to vasopressors (P < .002). Multivariate analyses indicated that age, case mix, and use of vasoactive agents were all independent predictors of inhospital mortality (P = .001) but that type of monitoring was not (P = .638). CONCLUSIONS: In a 5-year period, the decreased insertions of PACs were replaced by increased utilization of less-invasive hemodynamic monitoring devices. This change in practice did not adversely impact mortality.

Asunto(s)

Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Hemodinámica , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/mortalidad , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/tendencias , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Fisiológico/mortalidad , Monitoreo Fisiológico/tendencias , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria

RESUMEN

Much work has been done over the years to assess cardiac output and better grasp haemodynamic profiles of patients in critical care and during major surgery. Pulmonary artery catheterization has long been considered as the standard of care, especially in critical care environments, however this dogma has been challenged over the last 10-15 years. This has led to a greater focus on alternate, lesser invasive technologies. This review focuses on the scientific and clinical outcomes basis of oesophageal Doppler monitoring. The science underpinning Doppler shift assessment of velocity stretches back over 100 years, whereas the clinical applicability, and specifically clinical outcomes improvement can be attributed to the last 20 years. Oesophageal Doppler monitoring (ODM), and its associated protocol-guided fluid administration, has been shown to reduce complications, length of stay, and overall healthcare cost when incorporated into perioperative fluid management algorithms. However, more recent advances in enhanced recovery after surgery programs have led to similar improvements, leading the clinician to consider the role of Oesophageal Doppler Monitor to be more focused in high-risk surgery and/or the high-risk patient.

Asunto(s)

Gasto Cardíaco , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/tendencias , Humanos , Ultrasonografía

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the pleth variability index (PVI), derived noninvasively from a pulse oximeter probe, would predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing noncardiac surgeries. DESIGN: A clinical, prospective, observational study. SETTING: Operating room of a tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine adult patients undergoing a range of noncardiac surgeries, requiring general anesthesia, tracheal intubation, and mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous volume expansion with 500 mL of colloid following induction of general anesthesia and after a period of hemodynamic stability before the start of surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline values for PVI and stroke volume index, derived from an esophageal Doppler monitor, were compared with final values after the volume expansion. Patients were classified into fluid responders and nonresponders based on a stroke volume index increase of ≥ 10%. The optimal cut-off value for baseline pleth variability index for predicting fluid responsiveness was determined. There were 17 responders (59%) to the 500-mL volume expansion. Baseline PVI value was significantly different between responders and nonresponders (16.5 ± 6.4% v 10.3 ± 2.7%; p = 0.004). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated significant predictive ability of an increase in stroke volume index for PVI with area under the curve of 0.84 (95% confidence interval = 0.69-0.99). The optimal cut-off value for baseline PVI was 10.5%, with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Pleth variability index is predictive of fluid responsiveness in adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Asunto(s)

Anestesia General/métodos , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Oximetría/métodos , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Oximetría/estadística & datos numéricos , Pletismografía/métodos , Pletismografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Adulto Joven

RESUMEN

Hemodynamic monitoring is an essential element in the management of perioperative patients. In addition, anesthesiologists routinely used blood pressure (invasive or non invasive), heart rate, urinary output and central venous pressure as monitoring modalities. Esophageal doppler monitoring, as a minimally invasive hemodynamic assessment tool, has a good correlation with pulmonary artery catheterization in measuring cardiac output. We experienced a case of concealed retroperitoneal hemorrhage in a patient who underwent a laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy. When surgeons tried to close trocar sites, the patient's blood pressure dropped rapidly. At laparoscopy, we could not find gross bleeding. However, we could detect hypovolemia by esophageal doppler monitoring (CardioQ, Deltex(TM), UK). The procedure was converted to open laparotomy. Thereafter, we could find retroperitoneal hemorrhage, and vascular repair was done successfully. The patient recovered without any other complications.

Asunto(s)

Humanos , Presión Sanguínea , Gasto Cardíaco , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz , Presión Venosa Central , Gastrectomía , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Hemodinámica , Hemorragia , Hipovolemia , Laparoscopía , Laparotomía , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the validity of corrected flow time (FTc) as a predictor of fluid responsiveness for patients with sepsis-induced hypotension in the emergency department. METHODS: A total of 26 adult patients, who presented in the emergency department with sepsis-induced hypotension with spontaneous breathing, were enrolled in this prospective, interventional study. These patients were monitored by Esophageal Doppler (ED); FTc, central venous pressure (CVP), stroke volume index (SVI), and inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) were measured before and after fluid challenge. Responsiveness to fluid challenge was defined as an SVI increase> or =10%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and compared to evaluate the overall performance of preload indices (CVP, FTc, IVCD) in terms of predicting fluid responsiveness. RESULTS: Of the hemodynamic parameters initially measured, there were statistically significant differences in FTc and CVP between the responsive and unresponsive groups. Before and after fluid challenge, noticeable changes were observed in mean arterial pressure (MAP), CVP and IVCD between the two groups. Only the responsive group demonstrated statistical difference in FTc. The areas under the curves for FTc (0.870; 95% CIs, 0.708-0.979; p=.009) were significantly greater than those for CVP and IVCD. CONCLUSION: The corrected flow time (FTc) method may be a good predictor of fluid responsiveness relative to sepsis-induced hypotension for patients in the emergency department.

Asunto(s)

Adulto , Humanos , Presión Arterial , Presión Venosa Central , Urgencias Médicas , Hemodinámica , Hipotensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración , Curva ROC , Sepsis , Volumen Sistólico , Vena Cava Inferior

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the validity of corrected flow time (FTc) as a predictor of fluid responsiveness for patients with sepsis-induced hypotension in the emergency department. METHODS: A total of 26 adult patients, who presented in the emergency department with sepsis-induced hypotension with spontaneous breathing, were enrolled in this prospective, interventional study. These patients were monitored by Esophageal Doppler (ED); FTc, central venous pressure (CVP), stroke volume index (SVI), and inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) were measured before and after fluid challenge. Responsiveness to fluid challenge was defined as an SVI increase> or =10%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and compared to evaluate the overall performance of preload indices (CVP, FTc, IVCD) in terms of predicting fluid responsiveness. RESULTS: Of the hemodynamic parameters initially measured, there were statistically significant differences in FTc and CVP between the responsive and unresponsive groups. Before and after fluid challenge, noticeable changes were observed in mean arterial pressure (MAP), CVP and IVCD between the two groups. Only the responsive group demonstrated statistical difference in FTc. The areas under the curves for FTc (0.870; 95% CIs, 0.708-0.979; p=.009) were significantly greater than those for CVP and IVCD. CONCLUSION: The corrected flow time (FTc) method may be a good predictor of fluid responsiveness relative to sepsis-induced hypotension for patients in the emergency department.

Asunto(s)

Adulto , Humanos , Presión Arterial , Presión Venosa Central , Urgencias Médicas , Hemodinámica , Hipotensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración , Curva ROC , Sepsis , Volumen Sistólico , Vena Cava Inferior