RESUMEN

A 64-year-old male presented for a baseline ophthalmic exam before beginning erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, for stage 4 papillary urothelial cancer. Baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) and ophthalmic examination were unremarkable. After one month of treatment, his OCT demonstrated a significant thickening of the ellipsoid zone and prominence of the interdigitation zones along with a small amount of subretinal fluid. Two months after discontinuation of the medication, the OCT returned to baseline. Erdafitinib is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer with FGFR2 or FGFR3 mutations. However, retinal toxicity can ensue with the initiation of the drug and cause subjective vision changes and OCT abnormalities. The drug may exert toxic effects on retinal pigment epithelium, which may be seen through interval OCTs and visualization of the interdigitation zone. Therefore, pronunciation of the ellipsoid and interdigitation zone on OCT may allow for surveillance of early manifestations of erdafitinib-induced retinal toxicity.

RESUMEN

Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), a subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accounts for about 30% of all lung cancers (LC) and exhibits a dismal response to current therapeutic protocols. Existed studies have indicated that aberrations in fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) play a pivotal role in the progression of LUSC, rendering them as attractive targets for therapeutic intervention in this cancer type. This study found that Erdafitinib (Erda), a novel pan-FGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), exerted a cytotoxic effect on LUSC cells. However, STAT3, the downstream target of FGFRs, remained still activated despite Erdafitinib treatment. Then, a STAT3 inhibitor, Stattic (Sta), was concurrently used with Erdafitinib, and the combined treatment demonstrated a synergistic efficacy in both in vitro and in vivo models of LUSC when compared to that of the treatment of the Erdafitinib or Stattic alone. Further molecular studies showed that such an effect of Erdafitinib and Stattic was associated with their concurrently inhibitory effect on FGFR1 and STAT3 signaling in LUSC cells. Therefore, the findings of this study indicated that the concurrent use of Erdafitinib and Stattic is a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of FGFR1-positive LUSC.

RESUMEN

The aim of this study is to investigate novel strategies for reducing adverse reactions caused by erdafitinib through a drug combination based on its pharmacokinetic characteristics. The spectrum and characterizations of drugs that can inhibit the metabolism of erdafitinib are examined both in vitro and in vivo. The efficacy of combination regimens are then evaluated using subcutaneous xenograft tumor models. The results demonstrated that sertraline and duloxetine, out of more than 100 screened drugs, inhibited the metabolism of erdafitinib through mixed and non-competitive inhibition, respectively. This inhibition primarily occurred via the CYP2C9 and CYP2D6 pathways. The primary alleles of CYP2C9 and CYP2D6 not only determine the metabolic characteristics of erdafitinib but also influence the strength of drug-drug interactions. Co-administration of sertraline or duloxetine with erdafitinib in rats and mice resulted in nearly a three-fold increase in the blood exposure of erdafitinib and its major metabolite M6. When sertraline or duloxetine was combined with 1/3 of the erdafitinib dosage, the anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects on SNU-16 xenografts were comparable to those of the original full dose of erdafitinib. However, the combination regimen significantly mitigated hyperphosphatemia, retinal damage, intestinal villus damage, and gut microbiome dysbiosis. This study utilized pharmacokinetic methods to propose a new formulation of erdafitinib combined with sertraline or duloxetine. The findings suggest that this combination has potential for clinical co-administration based on a database analysis, thereby providing a novel strategy for anti-tumor treatment with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors.

RESUMEN

Background: For patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), prognosis is poor and effective treatment options are limited. Erdafitinib is an oral fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) kinase inhibitor approved by the FDA for the treatment of adults with la/mUC harboring FGFR alterations whose disease progressed following at least 1 prior line of therapy, including a PD-1 or PD-L(1) inhibitor, based on the phase 3, randomized THOR trial (NCT03390504, Cohort 1). Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib vs enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (EV) in the absence of head-to-head comparison via an anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Methods: An anchored MAIC was conducted according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance, with physician's choice of chemotherapy (docetaxel/paclitaxel and vinflunine) as the common comparator. Individual patient data from THOR were adjusted to match published key eligibility criteria and average baseline characteristics of EV-301, such as Bellmunt risk score, liver or visceral metastases, primary site, among others. Erdafitinib was then indirectly compared with EV using the relative treatment effects for the reweighted THOR population and those published for EV-301. Results: After matching, the effective sample size for THOR was 126 patients. The MAIC-recalculated hazard ratio (95% credible interval) for erdafitinib vs EV was 0.92 (0.54, 1.57) for overall survival and 0.93 (0.55, 1.56) for progression-free survival, yielding Bayesian probabilities of erdafitinib being better than EV of 62.1% and 60.5%, respectively. For response outcomes, the MAIC-recalculated risk ratio was 1.49 (0.56, 3.90) for confirmed objective response rate and 2.89 (0.27, 30.33) for confirmed complete response with probabilities of 72.6% and 81.3% for erdafitinib being better than EV, respectively. For safety, MAIC-yielded risk ratios of 1.09 (0.99, 1.21) for any treatment-related adverse events, 0.86 (0.57, 1.28) for grade 3+ TRAEs, and 1.02 (0.98, 1.06) for any treatment-emergent adverse events. Conclusion: The MAIC indicates comparable efficacy of erdafitinib vs EV for overall survival and progression-free survival, with erdafitinib showing a higher probability of achieving deep responses. While erdafitinib is associated with slightly more adverse events compared with EV, these events seem to be less severe.

RESUMEN

The standard of care for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) was historically identified with platinum-based chemotherapy. Thanks to the advances in biological and genetic knowledge and technologies, new therapeutic agents have emerged in this setting recently: the immune checkpoint inhibitors and the fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors as the target therapy for patients harboring alterations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway. However, chasing a tumor's tendency to recur and progress, a new class of agents has more recently entered the scene, with promising results. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are in fact the latest addition, with enfortumab vedotin being the first to receive accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in December 2019, followed by sacituzumab govitecan. Many other ADCs are still under investigation. ADCs undoubtedly represent the new frontier, with the potential of transforming the management of mUC treatment in the future. Therefore, we reviewed the landscape of mUC treatment options, giving an insight into the molecular basis and mechanisms, and evaluating new therapeutic strategies in the perspective of more and more personalized treatments.

Asunto(s)

Inmunoconjugados , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/metabolismo , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: FGFR genomic aberrations occur in approximately 5-10% of human cancers. Erdafitinib has previously demonstrated efficacy and safety in FGFR-altered advanced solid tumors, such as gliomas, thoracic, gastrointestinal, gynecological, and other rare cancers. However, its efficacy and safety in Asian patients remain largely unknown. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase IIa study of erdafitinib to evaluate its efficacy in Asian patients with FGFR-altered advanced cholangiocarcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and esophageal cancer. METHODS: Patients with pathologically/cytologically confirmed, advanced, or refractory tumors who met molecular and study eligibility criteria received oral erdafitinib 8 mg once daily with an option for pharmacodynamically guided up-titration to 9 mg on a 28-day cycle, except for four NSCLC patients who received erdafitinib 10 mg (7 days on/7 days off) as they were recruited before the protocol amendment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (cholangiocarcinoma: 22; NSCLC: 12; esophageal cancer: 1) were enrolled. At data cutoff (November 19, 2021), the objective response rate for patients with cholangiocarcinoma was 40.9% (95% CI, 20.7-63.6); the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.6-12.7) and median overall survival was 40.2 months (95% CI, 12.4-not estimable). No patient with RET/FGFR-altered NSCLC achieved objective response and the disease control rate was 25.0% (95% CI, 5.5-57.2%), with three patients with stable disease. The single patient with esophageal cancer achieved partial response. All patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events, and grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 22 (62.9%) patients. Hyperphosphatemia was the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event (all-grade, 85.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Erdafitinib demonstrated efficacy in a population of Asian patients in selected advanced solid tumors, particularly in those with advanced FGFR-altered cholangiocarcinoma. Treatment was tolerable with no new safety signals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02699606); study registration (first posted): 04/03/2016.

Asunto(s)

Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Colangiocarcinoma , Pirazoles , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Colangiocarcinoma/genética , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Adulto , Quinoxalinas/uso terapéutico , Quinoxalinas/administración & dosificación , Quinoxalinas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Pueblo Asiatico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Anciano de 80 o más Años

RESUMEN

In this review, we revisit the pivotal role of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) in bladder cancer (BLCA), underscoring its prevalence in both non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive forms of the disease. FGFR3 mutations in up to half of BLCAs play a well-established role in tumorigenesis, shaping distinct tumor initiation patterns and impacting the tumor microenvironment (TME). Emphasizing the importance of considering epithelial-mesenchymal transition profile and TME status, we revisit their relevance in predicting responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors in FGFR3-mutated BLCAs. This writing highlights the initially promising yet transient efficacy of the FGFR inhibitor Erdafitinib on FGFR3-mutated BLCA, stressing the pressing need to unravel resistance mechanisms and identify co-targets for future combinatorial studies. A thorough analysis of recent preclinical and clinical evidence reveals resistance mechanisms, including secondary mutations, epigenetic alterations in pathway effectors, phenotypic heterogeneity, and population-specific variations within FGFR3 mutational status. Lastly, we discuss the potential of combinatorial treatments and concepts like synthetic lethality for discovering more effective targeted therapies against FGFR3-mutated BLCA.

RESUMEN

FGFR3-TACC3 fusion-positive IDH-wild-type (IDH-WT) glioblastoma (GB) is a rare GB subtype occurring in approximately 3% of cases. It is clinical behavior and molecular profile is different from those of fusion-negative IDH-WT GBs. Evidence on the role of FGFR inhibitors in FGFR-altered gliomas is limited. We present the case of a patient with a FGFR3-TACC3 fusion-positive IDH-WT GB that at its second recurrence was treated with the FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib through a compassionate use program. Although no objective response was achieved, an overt deceleration in tumor growth was evidenced and the patient remained on treatment for 5.5 months.

RESUMEN

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare yet lethal primary intraocular malignancy affecting adults. Analysis of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database revealed that FGFR1 expression was increased in UM tumor tissues and was linked to aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. This study assessed the anti-tumor effects of Erdafitinib, a selective pan-FGFR inhibitor, in both in vitro and in vivo UM models. Erdafitinib exhibited a robust anti-cancer activity in UM through inducing ferroptosis in the FGFR1-dependent manner. Transcriptomic data revealed that Erdafitinib mediated its anti-cancer effects via modulating the ferritinophagy/lysosome biogenesis. Subsequent research revealed that Erdafitinib exerted its effects by reducing the expression of FGFR1 and inhibiting the activity of mTORC1 in UM cells. Concurrently, it enhanced the dephosphorylation, nuclear translocation, and transcriptional activity of TFEB. The aggregation of TFEB in nucleus triggered FTH1-dependent ferritinophagy, leading to lysosomal activation and iron overload. Conversely, the overexpression of FGFR1 served to mitigate the effects of Erdafitinib on ferritinophagy, lysosome biogenesis, and the activation of the mTORC1/TFEB signaling pathway. In vivo experiments have convincingly shown that Erdafitinib markedly curtails tumor growth in an UM xenograft mouse model, an effect that is closely correlated with a decrease in FGFR1 expression levels. The present study is the first to demonstrate that Erdafitinib powerfully induces ferroptosis in UM by orchestrating the ferritinophagy and lysosome biogenesis via modulating the FGFR1/mTORC1/TFEB signaling. Consequently, Erdafitinib emerges as a strong candidate for clinical trial investigation, and FGFR1 emerges as a novel and promising therapeutic target in the treatment of UM.

Asunto(s)

Ferroptosis , Lisosomas , Diana Mecanicista del Complejo 1 de la Rapamicina , Melanoma , Quinoxalinas , Receptor Tipo 1 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos , Transducción de Señal , Neoplasias de la Úvea , Humanos , Receptor Tipo 1 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Receptor Tipo 1 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Diana Mecanicista del Complejo 1 de la Rapamicina/metabolismo , Diana Mecanicista del Complejo 1 de la Rapamicina/genética , Animales , Lisosomas/metabolismo , Lisosomas/efectos de los fármacos , Ratones , Ferroptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Ferroptosis/genética , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/metabolismo , Melanoma/patología , Melanoma/genética , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Quinoxalinas/farmacología , Neoplasias de la Úvea/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Úvea/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Úvea/patología , Neoplasias de la Úvea/genética , Pirazoles/farmacología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Transcripción Básicos con Cremalleras de Leucinas y Motivos Hélice-Asa-Hélice/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción Básicos con Cremalleras de Leucinas y Motivos Hélice-Asa-Hélice/genética , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Ratones Desnudos

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Growth acceleration during postnatal growth only occurs during puberty as a physiological event and during catch-up growth mediated by growth-promoting therapies in growth disorders. Here we report on novel observations of skeletal symptoms during treatment with erdafitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) prescribed on the basis of a compassionate-use program. METHODS: Analysis of anthropometric, biochemical, clinical, and radiographic data of patients with CNS tumors who revealed an unanticipated growth spurt with initiation of therapy with erdafitinib was performed retrospectively. RESULTS: Linear growth acceleration was independent of sex steroids and IGF1 levels, which is especially remarkable in the context of heavily pretreated pediatric neuro-oncology patients with severe growth impairment before initiation of therapy. Growth acceleration was accompanied by a distinct widening of the growth plate and enhanced metaphyseal mineralization shortly after the start of TKI therapy. CONCLUSIONS: While targeted therapies including TKIs have become an essential part of adult cancer treatment, applications in children are still limited. Off-target effects specific to the pediatric population have been observed in various organ systems; however, knowledge about the effect of TKIs on the growing skeleton is scarce. Treatment with erdafitinib inhibits FGFR3-mediated effects and thus represents a very logical hypothetical framework of growth factor and sex steroid-independent growth acceleration.

RESUMEN

Erdafitinib, an oral pan-FGFR inhibitor, is used in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma for adults with FGFR3 genetic alterations and whose disease progressed following prior systemic therapy. This drug-drug interaction substudy evaluated the effect of erdafitinib on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam (cytochrome P450 3A4 substrate), and metformin (organic cation transporter 2 substrate). Twenty-five patients with advanced solid tumors harboring FGFR gene alterations received pretreatment with single doses of midazolam and metformin, followed by a daily dose of erdafitinib. Drug-drug interaction assessments were performed at erdafitinib steady state following coadministration of single doses of midazolam and metformin, respectively. Geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were estimated using linear mixed-effects models (90% confidence interval within 80%-125% indicated no interaction). The 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity of midazolam (86.3%, 88.5%, and 82.1%), 1-OH midazolam (99.8%, 97.4%, and 101.5%), and metformin (108.7%, 119.0%, and 113.9%) were either contained or slightly outside the 80%-125% interval and not considered clinically meaningful. Adverse events were consistent with the known erdafitinib safety profile; no new safety signals emerged. Thus, repeated dosing of erdafitinib had no clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam or metformin.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the THOR trial (NCT03390504) Cohort 1, erdafitinib demonstrated significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) (median 12.1 versus 7.8 months) and reduced risk of death by 36% (hazard ratio 0.64, P = 0.005) compared with chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients with FGFR alterations who progressed after ≥ 1 prior treatments, including anti-PD-(L)1. There have been no reports of the Japanese subgroup results yet. METHODS: THOR Cohort 1 randomized patients to erdafitinib once daily or docetaxel/vinflunine once every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). No specific statistical power was set for this Japanese subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Of 266 patients randomized, 27 (14 erdafitinib; 13 chemotherapy) were Japanese. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between treatments and to the overall population, except for more males, lower body weight, and more upper tract primary tumors among Japanese patients. Compared with chemotherapy, erdafitinib showed improved OS (median 25.4 versus 12.4 months), PFS (median 8.4 versus 2.9 months) and ORR (57.1% versus 15.4%). Any grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients from both arms but Grade 3/4 AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were lower in the erdafitinib arm. No new safety signals were observed in the Japanese subgroup. CONCLUSION: In the Japanese subgroup, erdafitinib showed improved survival and response compared to chemotherapy, with no new safety concerns. These results support erdafitinib as a treatment option for Japanese mUC patients with FGFR alterations, and early FGFR testing after diagnosis of mUC should be considered.

RESUMEN

We report a case of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), an on target skeletal toxicity of a pan-FGFR TKI inhibitor, erdafitinib. A 13-year-old boy was diagnosed to have an optic pathway/hypothalamic glioma with signs of increased intracranial pressure and obstructive hydrocephalus requiring placement of ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt. Sequencing of the tumor showed FGFR1-tyrosine kinase domain internal tandem duplication (FGFR1-KD-ITD). He developed hypothalamic obesity with rapid weight gain and BMI >30. At 12 weeks of treatment with erdafitinib, he developed persistent knee pain. X-ray of the right hip showed SCFE. Erdafitinib was discontinued, and he underwent surgical pinning of the right hip. MRI at discontinuation of erdafitinib showed a 30% decrease in the size of the tumor, which has remained stable at 6 months follow-up. Our experience and literature review suggest that pediatric patients who are treated with pan-FGFR TKIs should be regularly monitored for skeletal side effects.

RESUMEN

Background: A case of bilateral multifocal serous retinal detachments and dry eye complicated with unilateral peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK) during erdafitinib therapy is described. Case description: A 76-year-old male underwent a baseline examination two months after initiating 8 mg erdafitinib therapy (April 2023) due to metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Left subfoveal serous retinal detachment was observed initially but the treatment was resumed as he was asymptomatic. In May 2023, bilateral multifocal subretinal fluid pockets were identified, and the patient was still asymptomatic. However, in June 2023 he complained of bilateral redness and a stinging sensation in his right eye. Bilateral severe dry eye and right PUK were diagnosed. He was prescribed dexamethasone eye drops and sodium hyaluronate artificial tears for both eyes. One week later corneal staining decreased, and progression of PUK ceased. Erdafitinib therapy was discontinued in June 2023 due to the planned transurethral prostatectomy. By July 2023, after discontinuation of the drug and administration of the topical treatment, the dry eye improved and the PUK became inactive. There was also resolution of subretinal fluid pockets in the right eye and a reduction of subretinal fluid pockets in the left eye. After the reinitiation of erdafitinib therapy, serous retinal detachments recurred in both eyes in September 2023, but both corneas remained stable with topical low-dose dexamethasone, cyclosporine-A and artificial tear usage. Conclusion: Erdafitinib therapy may lead to concurrent anterior and posterior segment complications. Multidisciplinary monitoring is crucial for patients undergoing erdafitinib therapy to prevent possible visual disturbances. LEARNING POINTS: Erdafitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors 1 to 4, is administered for the treatment of locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma but however is fraught with several systemic and ocular side effects.Concurrent anterior and posterior segment ocular involvement could be encountered in patients undergoing erdafitinib therapy.Maintaining a high level of suspicion and closely monitoring for potential ocular complications through collaborative efforts is essential for all patients undergoing erdafitinib therapy.

RESUMEN

Erdafitinib, a selective and potent oral pan-FGFR inhibitor, is metabolized mainly through CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 enzymes. This phase 1, open-label, single-sequence, drug-drug interaction study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single oral dose of erdafitinib alone and when co-administered with steady state oral carbamazepine, a dual inducer of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9, in 13 healthy adult participants (NCT04330248). Compared with erdafitinib administration alone, carbamazepine co-administration decreased total and free maximum plasma concentrations of erdafitinib (Cmax) by 35% (95% CI 30%-39%) and 22% (95% CI 17%-27%), respectively. The areas under the concentration-time curve over the time interval from 0 to 168 hours, to the last quantifiable data point, and to time infinity (AUC168h, AUClast, AUCinf), were markedly decreased for both total erdafitinib (56%-62%) and free erdafitinib (48%-55%). The safety profile of erdafitinib was consistent with previous clinical studies in healthy participants, with no new safety concerns when administered with or without carbamazepine. Co-administration with carbamazepine may reduce the activity of erdafitinib due to reduced exposure. Concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inducers with erdafitinib should be avoided.

Asunto(s)

Área Bajo la Curva , Carbamazepina , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Carbamazepina/farmacología , Carbamazepina/farmacocinética , Carbamazepina/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inductores del Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/farmacología , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C9/metabolismo , Pirazoles/farmacocinética , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/farmacología , Quinoxalinas/farmacocinética , Quinoxalinas/efectos adversos , Quinoxalinas/administración & dosificación , Quinoxalinas/farmacología , Administración Oral , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/antagonistas & inhibidores

Asunto(s)

Quinoxalinas , Humanos , Quinoxalinas/uso terapéutico , Quinoxalinas/efectos adversos , Quinoxalinas/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

Cancer immunotherapy is administered for first-line, second-line, neoadjuvant, or adjuvant treatment of advanced, metastatic, and recurrent cancer in the liver, gastrointestinal tract, and genitourinary tract, and other solid tumors. Erdafitinib is a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, and it is an adenosine triphosphate competitive inhibitor of FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, and FGFR4. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies that block programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand that exert intrinsic antitumor mechanisms. The promising results of first-line treatment of advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma with PD-1 blockades with single or combined agents, indicate a new concept in the treatment of advanced, metastatic, and recurrent hepatic and gastrointestinal carcinomas. Cancer immunotherapy as first-line treatment will improve overall survival and provide better quality of life. Debate is arising as to whether to apply the cancer immunotherapy as first-line treatment in invasive carcinomas, or as second-line treatment in recurrent or metastatic carcinoma following the standard chemotherapy. The literature in the field is not definite, and so far, there has been no consensus on the best approach in this situation. At present, as it is described in this editorial, the decision is applied on a case-by-case basis.

RESUMEN

Purpose: This report aims to highlight the wide spectrum of ophthalmic adverse events associated with erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor inhibitor that blocks activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MAPK/MEK) cascade. The purpose of this report is to describe a case of erdafitinib-associated bilateral outer retinal alterations in the MEK-associated retinopathy spectrum and rapid onset bilateral total cataracts following a 20-month course of erdafitinib therapy. Observations: A 69 year old male with metastatic bladder cancer presented 47 days following treatment initiation with daily erdafitinib (8-mg) with mild new subretinal fluid and minimal associated subretinal debris in the left eye and accentuation/thickening of the interdigitation zone in the right eye. Over the course of treatment, improvements were noted, particularly with erdafitinib dose reduction. At 20 months, both eyes developed rapidly progressive mature cataracts with significant visual changes, necessitating bilateral cataract extraction. Conclusions and importance: The potential stability of moderate outer retinal changes (i.e., ellipsoid zone/interdigitation zone, subretinal fluid) while continuing erdafitinib therapy is highlighted in this report. In addition, the importance of continued ophthalmic surveillance is emphasized given the possible association of anterior segment adverse events with long-term erdafitinib use.

RESUMEN

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: The activity of targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced bladder cancer is reviewed. SUMMARY: Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer. Pembrolizumab is approved alone as first-line therapy for patients who are ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy and with enfortumab for patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Avelumab is approved for maintenance therapy in patients who have not progressed with first-line platinum-containing therapy. Pembrolizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab are approved second-line therapy in patients who experience progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Erdafitinib is indicated for advanced disease that has susceptible FGFR2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and has progressed during or after treatment with at least one line of platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan are antibody-drug conjugates. They are both approved for patients who have received anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 therapy and treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab is also indicated for patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin-based therapy and have received one or more prior lines of therapy. CONCLUSION: Six targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have been approved for patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. They all have demonstrated activity in patients for whom disease has progressed during or after platinum-based therapy. Pembrolizumab, with and without enfortumab, has demonstrated first-line activity, and avelumab is a key maintenance therapy after first-line treatment. The results of additional clinical trials should provide evidence to establish the exact role in therapy of each agent in patients with advanced disease.