RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Manta Vascular Closure Device is a novel collagen-based vascular closure device that has been designed specifically for closure of large-bore percutaneous arterial accesses. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the immediate and 30-day outcome of Manta at the completion of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The hypothesis is that Manta is not inferior in obtaining hemostasis compared with the Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited all the percutaneous accesses for (T)EVAR performed from January 2021 to April 2023 by all the Italian Divisions of Vascular Surgery using Manta at the time of data collection (May 2023). The primary outcome is to evaluate the incidence of complications at the puncture site after Manta implantation and at 1 month, and compare this with ProGlide. We applied the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) criteria for observational studies. RESULTS: Overall, 524 consecutive femoral accesses for (T)EVAR procedures were collected: 355 in the Manta cohort and 169 in the ProGlide cohort, respectively. The size of the sheath was 17.2±2.7 Fr for Manta, 15.7±2.3 Fr for ProGlide (p<0.001). No statistically significant differences between the groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, ultrasound-guided access, femoral calcifications, intraoperative, and 30-day complications. Successful arterial closure at groin puncture sites for (T)EVAR using Manta is 90.5% and 93.1% using ProGlide. Freedom for any reintervention for any complication is 95.5% for Manta and 96% for ProGlide. CONCLUSION: The 2 vascular closure devices have proved to be similar in terms of complications, without any statistically significant difference, although the median size of the sheaths for (T)EVAR was statistically significantly larger when Manta has been used, compared with ProGlide. CLINICAL IMPACT: Manta® is effective in the hemostasis of the access sites following the completion of (T)EVAR in this multicenter, retrospective, case-control study on 524 percutaneous femoral accesses. Compared to the more popular Proglide®, the average size of the introducers in the Manta® group was significantly larger than in the Proglide® group.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to investigate the correlations between radiomics-based assessment and outcomes, including positive aortic remodeling (PAR), reintervention for dissection at 1 year, and overall survival, in patients with Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. The cohort comprised 104 patients who had undergone TEVAR of TBAD in our institution between January 2010 and October 2022. We segmented preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of the patients' descending aorta regions, then extracted a comprehensive set of radiomic features, including first-order features, shape features (2D and 3D), gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), gray-level size zone matrix, gray-level run length matrix, gray-level dependence matrix, neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix, from the regions of interest. Next, we selected radiomics features associated with total descending aorta positive aortic remodeling (TDA-PAR) and reintervention by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and features associated with survival by LASSO-Cox regression. This enabled us to calculate radiomics-based risk scores for each patient. We then allocated the patients to high and low radiomics-based risk groups, the cutoff being the median score. We used 3 different models to validate the radiomics-based risk scores. RESULTS: The patients' baseline characteristics did not differ between those who achieved TDA-PAR and those who did not. The radiomics-based risk scores were significantly and independently associated with all 3 outcomes. As to the impact of specific radiomics features, we found that GLSZM_SmallAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis and shape_Maximum2DDiameterColumn had positive impacts on both reintervention and survival outcomes, whereas GLCM_Idmn positively affected survival but negatively affected reintervention. We found that radiomics-based risk for TDA-PAR correlated most significantly with zone 6 PAR. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics-based risk scores were significantly associated with the outcomes of TDA-PAR, reintervention, and overall survival. Radiomics has the potential to make significant contributions to prediction of outcomes in patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR. CLINICAL IMPACT: In this study of 104 patients with Type B aortic dissection, we demonstrated associations between radiomics-based risk and postoperative outcomes, including total descending aorta positive aortic remodeling, reintervention and survival. These findings highlight radiomics' potential as a tool for risk stratification and prognostication in acute Type B aortic dissection management.

RESUMEN

Background: Aortic dissection is the most common acute aortic syndrome, and renal artery is the most common involved artery. The size and location of the re-entry tear directly affect the blood flow enhancement of the false lumen branch artery after surgery. In this study, the morphology and hemodynamics of the re-entry tear were comprehensively analyzed, and the location and size of the re-entry tear were quantitatively evaluated to calculate the re-entry tear index (RTI). This study aimed to assess the predictive capability of a comprehensive quantitative RTI for improvement in renal perfusion following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in cases of acute and subacute Stanford type B aortic dissection with renal artery involvement. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 137 patients diagnosed with acute or subacute type B aortic dissection with concomitant renal artery involvement who underwent TEVAR at Anzhen Hospital in Beijing from October 2017 to November 2021 were enrolled. Renal blood flow was estimated quantitatively with ultrasound. Based on the ultrasound findings of renal artery flow, the patients were classified into two groups: group A [postoperative volume flow (VolFlow) reduced compared to preoperative VolFlow] and group B (postoperative VolFlow increased compared to preoperative VolFlow). All re-entry tears present in the aortic trunk according to reconstructed computed tomography angiography (CTA) obtained preoperatively were included in the analysis. The general information of patients, whether the involved renal artery arose partially or wholly from the false lumen, the proximal diameter and length of the covered stent, the diameter of primary entry tear, the RTI, etc. were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were executed to assess the risk factors associated with increased renal arterial blood flow subsequent to TEVAR. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to ascertain the optimal cutoff value and predictive efficacy of the RTI. Results: A total of 137 patients, comprising of 32 with acute and 105 with subacute type B aortic dissection accompanied by renal artery involvement, underwent TEVAR. Among these patients, 44 (32.1%) were assigned to group A and 93 (67.9%) to group B. Renal blood flow exhibited an increase in 67.9% of the patients after TEVAR. The results of multivariate analysis indicated that the RTI is an independent risk factor for postoperative renal perfusion improvement [odds ratio =17.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.13-78.55; P=0.020]. The optimal cutoff value for RTI, determined to be 0.033, demonstrated the ability to identify renal perfusion improvement in patients without hypertension with a sensitivity of 53.7% and a specificity of 68.9%. In patients with concomitant hypertension, RTI exhibited a sensitivity of 96.6% and a specificity of 60.0%, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.792 (95% CI: 0.643-0.941; P=0.021) for identifying renal perfusion improvement. Conclusions: RTI demonstrated a favorable predictive value for improving renal malperfusion following TEVAR in cases of aortic dissection with renal artery involvement.

RESUMEN

This report details a hybrid approach for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with Marfan syndrome (MFS). A 34-year-old patient with MFS and prior open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair underwent bilateral common iliac artery interposition graft repair and endovascular aortic repair. The bifurcated stent graft was implanted into the previous thoracoabdominal graft proximally and iliac interposition grafts distally. Postoperatively, the patient recovered uneventfully with sac regression to 4.5 cm through 2-year follow-up, without seal zone degeneration. This hybrid approach aimed to eliminate landing zone degeneration in patients with MFS undergoing endovascular repair.

RESUMEN

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is now first line therapy for most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) as it reduces perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to open surgery. However, up to 40 % of patients do not undergo recommended follow-up, increasing risk of subsequent rupture. Risk factors for loss to follow-up have been studied retrospectively, however, qualitative studies assessing perceived barriers and facilitators to follow-up have not been performed and there are few qualitative protocols within the vascular surgery literature. This article presents a qualitative descriptive study protocol aimed at understanding and improving post-operative follow-up adherence after EVAR developed through an iterative process based on the Theoretical Domains Framework of behavior change. Steps include:•Selection of target behavior and study design•Development of study materials, sampling/recruitment strategy, and data collection•Qualitative data analysis and reporting findingsWe demonstrate the feasibility of this study by pilot testing of the semi-structured interview guides on a small group of patients, healthcare providers, and key personnel. This protocol aims to describe key stakeholder experiences within the healthcare system that will ultimately serve as the basis for future multi-institutional research piloting intervention strategies to improve EVAR follow-up.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative aortobronchial fistula (ABF) is a rare complication that can occur in 0.3%-5.0% of patients over an extended period of time after thoracic aortic surgery. Direct visualization of the fistula via imaging is rare. AIM: To investigate the relationship between computed tomography (CT) findings and the clinical signs/symptoms of ABF after thoracic aortic surgery. METHODS: Six patients (mean age 71 years, including 4 men and 2 women) with suspected ABF on CT (air around the graft) at our hospital were included in this retrospective study between January 2004 and September 2022. Chest CT findings included direct confirmation of ABF, peri-graft fluid, ring enhancement, dirty fat sign, atelectasis, pulmonary hemorrhage, and bronchodilation, and the clinical course were retrospectively reviewed. The proportion of each type of CT finding was calculated. RESULTS: ABF detection after surgery was found to have a mean and median of 14 and 13 years, respectively. Initial signs and symptoms were asymptomatic in 4 patients, bloody sputum was found in 1 patient, and fever was present in 1 patient. The complications of ABF included graft infection in 2 patients and graft infection with hemoptysis in 2 patients. Of the 6 patients, 3 survived, 2 died, and 1 was lost to follow-up. The locations of the ABFs were as follows: 1 in the ascending aorta; 1 in the aortic arch; 2 in the aortic arch leading to the descending aorta; and 2 in the descending aorta. ABFs were directly confirmed by CT in 4/6 (67%) patients. Peri-graft dirty fat (4/6, 67%) and peri-graft ring enhancement (3/6, 50%) were associated with graft infection, endoleaks and pseudoaneurysms were associated with hemoptysis (2/6, 33%). CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic ABF after thoracic aortic surgery can be confirmed on chest CT. CT is useful for the diagnosis of ABF and its complications.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is challenging to simultaneously conduct total endovascular repair and reconstruct the left subclavian artery (LSA) and isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) in patients who had an ILVA and required zone 2 anchoring. This pilot study reported the initial application experience of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a proximal zone 2 landing for aortic arch reconstruction in patients with ILVA. METHODS: This study was a retrospective consecutive single-center case series analysis, which involved four patients with ILVA who required zone 2 anchoring and received TEVAR combined with a single-branched stent graft and concomitant on-table fenestration between March 2021 and December 2022. RESULTS: The postoperative follow-up period was 6-27 months, and no postoperative deaths or other primary complications occurred. There were no signs of a stroke or spinal cord ischemia, as well as no chest or back pain. The postoperative computed tomography angiography showed unobstructed ILVA and LSA, no stent stenosis and displacement, and no signs of endoleak. CONCLUSION: The outcome suggested that this technique might be a feasible, safe, and alternative treatment for such patients. Further studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm our findings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Techniques in endovascular therapy have evolved to offer a promising alternative to medical therapy alone for Type B aortic dissections (TBADs). AIM: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare mortality and overall complications between thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and best medical therapy (BMT) in patients with TBADs. METHODS: We included randomized control trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies that compared TEVAR and BMT for the treatment of type B aortic dissection. Multiple electronic databases were searched. RESULTS: Thirty-two cohort studies including 150,836 patients were included. TEVAR was associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate than BMT (RR = 0.79, CI = 0.63, 0.99, P = 0.04), notably in patients ≥ 65 years of age (RR = 0.78, CI = 0.64, 0.95, P = 0.01). The TEVAR group had a significantly prolonged hospital stay (MD = 3.42, CI = 1.69, 5.13, P = 0.0001) and ICU stay (MD = 3.18, CI = 1.48, 4.89, P = 0.0003) compared to the BMT. BMT was associated with increased stroke risk (RR = 1.52, CI = 1.29, 1.79, P < 0.00001). No statistically significant differences in late mortality (1, 3, and 5 years) or intervention-related factors (acute renal failure, spinal cord ischemia, myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, and sepsis) were noted between the groups. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis revealed a significant association between the TEVAR group and a decreased mortality rate of TBAD compared to the medical treatment group, especially in patients aged 65 years or older. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Aim The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) devices and to examine their short-term outcomes. Materials and methods This was a descriptive, retrospective observational study involving 15 patients diagnosed with either aortoiliac or isolated iliac artery aneurysms and treated with an IBE device. Data were collected for patients who received IBE devices at Glan Clwyd Hospital in Rhyl, United Kingdom, from February 2020 to May 2023. Results Most patients presented with asymptomatic aneurysms; 86.7% (n = 13) had bilateral common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms. The mean diameter of the CIA was 38.7 ± 8.8 mm, and the mean diameter of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was 39.8 ± 23 mm. For the indications of IBE use, 60% (n = 9) of the patients had iliac aneurysms reaching the intervention threshold, 20% (n = 3) had AAA reaching the threshold, and 20% (n = 3) had aortoiliac aneurysms reaching the threshold. The majority of patients underwent bilateral femoral access (86.7%; n = 13), while 13.3% (n = 2) required both femoral and brachial access. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Aside from 20% (n = 3) of cases where the sac size remained static, the majority of patients (80%; n = 12) experienced sac regression. All patients were free from buttock claudication. A type II endoleak was observed in 33.3% (n = 5) of patients. No reinterventions were reported. The mean primary patency was 30.9 ± 0.7 months, and the follow-up period ranged from 12 to 36 months. Conclusions IBEs are an effective medical device, demonstrating a high rate of technical success, minimal need for additional procedures, and a low incidence of complications while maintaining a satisfactory rate of primary patency.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Late adverse events (LAE) are common among initially uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD), however, identifying those patients at highest risk of LAE remains a significant challenge. Early false lumen (FL) growth has been suggested to increase risk, but confident determination of growth is often hampered by error in 2D clinical measurements. Semi-automated 3D mapping of aortic growth, such as by vascular deformation mapping (VDM), can potentially overcome this limitation using CT angiograms (CTA). We hypothesized that FL growth in the early pre-dissection phase by VDM can accurately predict LAEs. METHODS: We performed a two-centre retrospective study of uTBAD patients, with paired CTAs in the acute (1-14 days) and subacute/early chronic (1-6 months) periods. VDM analysis was used to map 3D growth. Standard clinical CT measures (i.e., aortic diameters, tear characteristics) were also collected. Multivariate analysis was conducted using a decision tree and Cox proportional hazards model. LAEs were defined as aneurysmal FL (>55mm); rapid growth (>5mm within 6 months); aorta-specific mortality, rupture, or re-dissection. RESULTS: 107 (69% male) initially uTBAD patients met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 7.3 (IQR 4.7-9.9) years. LAEs occurred in 72 patients (67%) at 2.5 (IQR 0.7-4.8) years after the initial event. A multivariate decision tree model identified VDM growth (>2.1 mm) and baseline diameter (>42.7 mm) as optimal predictors of LAEs (AUC-ROC = 0.94), achieving an 87% accuracy (sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 76%) after leave-one-out validation. Guideline reported high-risk features were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Early growth of the FL in uTBAD was the best tested indicator for LAEs and improves upon the current gold-standard of baseline diameter in selecting patients for early prophylactic TEVAR.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication that is associated with thoracoabdominal aortic repair, with higher risk associated with increased aortic coverage length, making patients undergoing branched/fenestrated endovascular repair(B/FEVAR) particularly vulnerable. A bundled SCI prevention protocol was previously reported to reduce SCI rates when compared to a historic cohort in a single-center study. Therefore, this analysis aims to further validate and update outcomes associated with the protocol given the routine implementation of this strategy at two institutions (University of Florida [UF] and the University of Alabama at Birmingham [UAB]) since inception. METHODS: Components of the SCI prevention protocol include selective cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, specified blood pressure parameters, transfusion goals, and selective pharmacologic adjuncts (naloxone, steroids). This protocol was routinely implemented in May 2015. Patients undergoing B/FEVAR from May 2015-December 2022 constituted the post-protocol cohort(n=402) and were compared to the pre-protocol cohort (n=160, January 2010-April 2015). The primary outcome was SCI incidence and subgroup analysis was conducted among patients deemed to be high-risk (Crawford extent I- III thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAA) dissection-related disease, prior aortic repair, coverage proximal to zone 5). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS: The pre- and post-protocol cohorts were demographically similar, though more post-protocol patients were American Society of Anesthesiology(ASA) class IV (86.1% vs. 55.0%; p<0.001). TAAA was the most common indication in both groups. CSF drain placement was more common in the post-protocol group, particularly among high-risk patients. SCI occurred in 15.9% of pre-protocol patients versus 3.0% of post-protocol patients(p<0.001). In high-risk patients, the pre- and post-protocol cohort SCI incidence was 23.2% vs. 5.0%, respectively (p<0.001). 30-day mortality was decreased in the post-protocol cohort (6.3% vs. 2.2%, p=0.02). Although the post-protocol group had a trend toward improved 1-year survival, this was not statistically significant (84.4% vs. 88.3%, log-rank p=0.35). Among SCI patients, one-year mortality was 28% and 33.3% in the pre- and post-protocol groups, respectively(p=0.46). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a bundled SCI prevention protocol significantly reduces SCI rates in B/FEVAR patients, which has now been validated at two institutions, with the most significant reductions occurring among high-risk patients. Although the overall one-year mortality difference was not significantly different between the cohorts, the high mortality rates among SCI patients highlights the importance of preventative measures.

RESUMEN

Background: Aortobronchial fistulas (ABFs) are rare but potentially life-threatening conditions, often presenting with haemoptysis. They can develop following various thoracic aortic conditions or procedures. Case Presentation: A 70-year-old patient with a history of descending aorta replacement and ischaemic stroke presented with chest pain and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Imaging revealed a fistula between the aortic prosthesis and the lung, along with other cardiovascular abnormalities. Despite the indication for anticoagulant therapy, tranexamic acid was initiated due to bleeding risk. The patient showed clinical improvement with tranexamic acid treatment but experienced recurrence of bleeding after discontinuation. Endovascular treatment for the contained rupture at the proximal stent anastomosis was indicated. Discussion: Haemoptysis is the primary symptom of ABFs, often recurring until the fistula enlarges. Postoperative aortic fistulas into the airways are uncommon and can occur years after surgery. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has become the primary treatment for high-risk patients with thoracic aortic disease. Various diagnostic modalities can visualize a fistula tract, but practical visualization is rare. Untreated ABFs invariably lead to death. Conclusion: This case highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing ABFs, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach and regular follow-up. Patient education and prompt reporting of symptoms are essential. Early intervention upon suspicion of recurrence is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is suboptimal due to limited compliance and relatively large variability in measurement methods of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac size after treatment. Measuring volume offers a more sensitive early indicator of aneurysm sac growth or regression/stability, but is more time consuming and thus less practical than measuring maximum diameter. This study evaluated the accuracy and consistency of the artificial intelligence (AI) driven software PRAEVAorta 2 and compared it with an established semi-automated segmentation method. METHODS: Post-EVAR aneurysm sac volumes measured by AI were compared with a semi-automated segmentation method (3mensio software) in patients with infrarenal AAA, focusing on absolute aneurysm volume and volume evolution over time. The clinical impact of both methods was evaluated by categorising patients as showing either AAA sac regression, stabilisation, or growth comparing the 30 day and one year post-EVAR computed tomography angiography (CTA) images. Intermethod and intramethod agreement were assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's κ statistic. RESULTS: Forty nine patients (98 CTA images) were analysed, after excluding 15 patients due to segmentation errors by AI owing to low quality CT scans. Aneurysm sac volume measurements showed excellent correlation (ICC = 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88 - 0.99) with good to excellent correlation for volume evolution over time (ICC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 - 0.91). Categorisation of AAA sac evolution showed fair correlation (Cohen's κ = 0.33), with 12 discrepancies (24%) between methods. The intramethod agreement for the AI software demonstrated perfect consistency (bias = -0.01 cc), indicating that it is more reliable compared with the semi-automated method. CONCLUSION: Despite some differences in AAA sac volume measurements, the highly consistent AI driven software accurately measured AAA sac volume evolution. AAA sac evolution classification appears to be more reliable than existing methods and may therefore improve risk stratification post-EVAR. It could facilitate AI driven personalised surveillance programmes. While high quality CTA images are crucial, considering radiation exposure is important, validating the software with non-contrast CT scans might reduce the radiation burden.

RESUMEN

Background: The objective of the study was to analyze mid-term results of unselected patients treated with the TREO (Terumo Aortic, Florida, USA) device at six German hospital sites. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients treated within and outside instructions for use (IFU) from January 2017 to November 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality and endograft related complications according to IFU status. Secondary outcomes were aneurysm/procedure related re-interventions. Results: 150 patients (92% male, mean age 73 ±8 years) were treated (within IFU 84% vs. outside IFU 16%) with the TREO device for abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=127 intact, n=17 symptomatic and n=6 ruptured; p=0.30). Technical success was achieved in 147/150 (within IFU 99% vs. outside IFU 92%, p=0.08). 30-day mortality was 2%, one year and overall mortality was 3% and 5%. During a mean follow-up of 28.4 months (range: 1-67.4 months), 35 (25%; within IFU 23% vs. outside IFU 35%, p=0.23) patients suffered from endoleaks. The majority were endoleaks type II (n=33), the remaining type Ia (n=5) and type Ib (n=3). No endoleaks type III-V, migrations or aneurysm ruptures occurred. Overall, 19 patients (13%; within IFU 13% vs. 15% outside IFU, p=0.70) received a secondary intervention: nine endoleak related endovascular procedures, three open conversions, two endograft limb related interventions, four surgical revisions of the femoral access sites and two bowl ischemia related procedures, respectively. Conclusions: This non industry-sponsored, multicenter trial indicates that using the TREO device in a real-world setting (both within and outside IFU) seems feasible in the treatment of patients suffering from AAA. While the rate of complications and secondary interventions is in line with previously published data, the findings highlight the fact that standard EVAR is associated with serious adverse events.

RESUMEN

The definitive management of combined aortic arch and descending aortic pathologies such as aneurysms and dissections is either a single or staged operation associated with high morbidity and mortality. Stroke, kidney dysfunction, coagulopathy and high blood transfusion requirements are all affiliated with hypothermic circulatory arrest and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass times. Considering the perilous nature of these operations, the authors describe a step-by-step zone 2 arch replacement as a staged frozen elephant trunk procedure, which provides an adequate landing zone for a later-placed endovascular stent yet maintains a short cardiopulmonary bypass time and no circulatory arrest.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

An infective native aortic aneurysm (INAA) is a rare, life-threatening, and complex disease. Therefore, the diagnosis and treatment of INAA remain uncertain. We describe the case of a 64-year-old man who had abdominal pain and a fever for more than one week. We diagnosed him with INAA on the basis of the clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and computed tomography (CT) images. After administering preoperative antibiotic therapy for four weeks, we performed endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). He then received antibiotic treatment for 12 months postoperatively. After successful treatment of an INAA with endovascular aortic repair, the patient had no recurrence for more than six years after the end of antibiotic therapy.

RESUMEN

Marfan syndrome is a rare inherited connective tissue disorder that can result in significant morbidity and mortality. We report a case of a 29-year-old pregnant woman presenting with an acute type B aortic dissection. Owing to cardiopulmonary decompensation and intestinal malperfusion, she underwent an emergency cesarean section followed by left subclavian to carotid transposition and thoracic endovascular aortic repair that was complicated by a retrograde type A aortic dissection and was managed surgically. Molecular testing confirmed the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome. This case highlights that multidisciplinary and hybrid management of challenging cases of acute aortic syndromes can result in a favorable outcome.

RESUMEN

Purpose: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the clinical outcomes associated with endovascular treatment for acute complicated type B aortic dissection, with a focus on the complex process of aortic remodeling. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective investigation using data extracted from the Songklanagarind Hospital database between January 2010 and January 2022. Electronic medical records of patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute complicated type B aortic dissections were reviewed. The analysis focused on in-hospital outcomes, overall survival, aorta-related survival, reintervention-free survival, and changes in aortic lumen diameter to assess aortic remodeling. Results: Over the study period, 32 patients with acute complicated type B aortic dissections underwent TEVAR. The in-hospital mortality rate was 9.4%, with complications occurring in 21.9% of patients. Temporary acute kidney injury was observed in 9.4% of the cases, wound bleeding in 6.3%, pneumonia in 6.3%, and permanent spinal cord ischemia in 3.1%. Re-intervention was necessary in 6.3% of cases. The overall survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 6 years were 78%, 75%, 65%, and 44%, respectively. Aorta-related survival rates were 87%, 87%, 83%, and 75% at the corresponding time intervals. The reintervention-free survival rates were 96%, 96%, 71%, and 71%, respectively. Survival analysis revealed that patients with ideal aortic remodeling experienced the most favorable outcomes, whereas those with undesirable aortic remodeling exhibited the least favorable survival. Notably, undesirable pattern of aortic remodeling emerged as a singular factor with a statistically significant influence on predicting survival (hazard ratio 4.37, P-value=0.021). Conclusion: TEVAR resulted in favorable aorta-related survival outcomes. Notably, the identification of changes in aortic lumen diameter alongside false lumen thrombosis, encapsulated within the framework of aortic remodeling patterns, has emerged as a robust predictor of post-TEVAR survival outcomes.

RESUMEN

Endovascular stent grafting is becoming more common in treating complex thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. When it becomes necessary to cover the supra-aortic vessels, maintaining blood supply through the supra-aortic branches can be achieved by performing in situ needle fenestration. We present a case of a 65-year-old man with a type B aortic dissection that extended from the origin of the left subclavian artery. A stent graft was inserted into the thoracic aorta distally of the origin of the left common carotid artery. Due to the stent graft moving distally and not adequately sealing the subclavian artery, a second stent graft was placed more proximally. Both stent grafts were successfully in situ fenestrated using a needle, and a stent graft was inserted into the subclavian artery. In conclusion, during thoracic endovascular aortic repair, in situ needle fenestration can be successfully carried out on two overlapping thoracic stent grafts.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) has shown favorable outcomes for repair of complex aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). Physician-modified endografting (PMEG) and the Gore Thoracoabdominal Multibranch Endoprosthesis (TAMBE) provide custom and off-the-shelf devices for FB-EVAR, respectively. This study compares the outcomes of TAMBE and PMEG at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent TAMBE as part of the multicenter pivotal trial or PMEG as part of a prospective physician sponsored investigational device exemption at a single institution between 2020-2022 were completed. Patient demographics, characteristics, perioperative and midterm outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included, with 12 in the TAMBE group and 56 in the PMEG group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Aneurysm type was most often TAAA in both groups (58% TAMBE and 52% PMEG). TAMBE had a higher rate of upper extremity access (100% vs 63%, P=.013) and longer mean procedure time (247 ± 36 vs 189 ± 49 minutes, P<.001). Other intraoperative metrics were similar between groups. Technical success was 100% in TAMBE and 95% in PMEG (P=0.412). There was no 30-day mortality in either group. No major adverse events occurred with TAMBE, while in PMEG cases, 2% had respiratory failure, 2% required dialysis, and 4% experienced spinal cord ischemia. While overall endoleak rates were similar (50% of TAMBE vs 41% of PMEG, P=0.57), type II accounted for all of the endoleaks in the TAMBE group, while type I or III endoleaks were seen in 11% of PMEG patients. At the median follow-up of 26.7 months for the TAMBE group and 21.2 months for the PMEG group, target vessel instability was seen in 10.4% of TAMBE, and 6.9% of PMEG targeted branches (P=0.401). Reintervention was required in 33% of TAMBE patients and 27% of PMEG patients (P=.646). Estimated freedom from reintervention at 3 years were similar (56% TAMBE vs. 62% PMEG, log-rank P=0.910). Freedom from visceral renal target vessel instability at 3 years was 89% for both groups (log-rank P=0.459). Kaplan Meier 3-year estimated survival was 100% for patients in the TAMBE group and 77% for patients in the PMEG group (log-rank P=.157). CONCLUSIONS: At experienced centers, FB-EVAR can be completed with PMEG or TAMBE with comparable, excellent perioperative and midterm outcomes. Reinterventions are frequently needed for both TAMBE and PMEG.