RESUMEN

The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique can be applied to extensive aortic pathology, including lesions in the aortic arch and proximal descending thoracic aorta. FET is useful for tear-oriented surgery in dissections, managing malperfusion syndrome, and promoting positive aortic remodeling. Despite these benefits, complications such as distal stent-induced new entry and spinal cord ischemia can pose serious problems with the FET technique. To prevent these complications, careful sizing and planning of the FET are crucial. Additionally, since the FET technique involves total arch replacement, meticulous surgical skills are essential, particularly for young surgeons. In this article, we propose several techniques to simplify surgical procedures, which may lead to better outcomes for patients with extensive aortic pathology. In the era of precision medicine, the next-generation FET device could facilitate the treatment of complex aortic diseases through a patient-tailored approach.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) appeared to be an innovative alternative to conventional endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. However, high rates of midterm failure of EVAS led to withdrawal of the device from the market. The study aim was to report midterm outcomes of patients treated with EVAS alone or associated with chimneys (Ch-EVAS) and the management of their complications. Methods: In this single centre study, all consecutive Nellix implants between 2013 and 2016 were included. The primary endpoint was device failure: (1) a triad of caudal migration of the Nellix stents >5 mm, separation of the endobags (>5 mm), and sac enlargement (>5 mm), with or without visible endoleak, (2) secondary aneurysm rupture, (3) surgical explant of the graft, or (4) any intervention for a type I endoleak. Overall mortality, aneurysm related mortality, and re-intervention rates were analysed. Results: Fifty patients (male n = 43, female n = 7) were included. Median follow-up was 3.05 years (interquartile range [IQR] 0.52, 4.63) and follow up index was 0.51 (IQR 0.10, 0.88). Device failures occurred in 17 patients (34%). Overall and aneurysm related mortality rates during the follow up period were 30% and 13%. Fourteen (28%) patients required re-interventions. Five EVAS patients (17%) presented with complications. Type Ia endoleaks were managed by device explantation for three patients, and endovascular aneurysm repair in Nellix for two patients. Type Ib endoleaks were managed with an iliac branched device and limb extension. Nine Ch-EVAS patients (42.9%) presented with complications. Type Ia endoleaks were was managed by Nellix stent prolongation and renal extension, two multibranched thoraco-abdominal devices, and two device explantations. Type Ib endoleaks were managed by limb extension and stent complications by stent angioplasty and iliorenal bypass. Conclusion: The midterm outcome of EVAS is poor. All patients who underwent EVAS implantation must be informed and should undergo frequent surveillance. Open repair and device explantation should be considered as the primary treatment.

RESUMEN

Current planning of aortic and peripheral endovascular procedures is based largely on manual measurements performed from the 3-dimensional reconstruction of preoperative computed tomography scans. Assessment of device behavior inside patient anatomy is often difficult, and available tools, such as 3-dimensional-printed models, have several limitations. Digital twin (DT) technology has been used successfully in automotive and aerospace industries and applied recently to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Artificial intelligence allows the treatment of large amounts of data, and its use in medicine is increasing rapidly. The aim of this review was to present the current status of DTs combined with artificial intelligence for planning endovascular procedures. Patient-specific DTs of the aorta are generated from preoperative computed tomography and integrate aorta mechanical properties using finite element analysis. The same methodology is used to generate 3-dimensional models of aortic stent-grafts and simulate their deployment. Post processing of DT models is then performed to generate multiple parameters related to stent-graft oversizing and apposition. Machine learning algorithms allow parameters to be computed into a synthetic index to predict Type 1A endoleak risk. Other planning and sizing applications include custom-made fenestrated and branched stent-grafts for complex aneurysms. DT technology is also being investigated for planning peripheral endovascular procedures, such as carotid artery stenting. DT provides detailed information on endovascular device behavior. Analysis of DT-derived parameters with machine learning algorithms may improve accuracy in predicting complications, such as Type 1A endoleaks.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool in detecting endoleaks in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using dual-energy computed tomography angiography (CTA). Material and methods: The study involved 95 patients who underwent EVAR and subsequent CTA follow-up. Dualenergy scans were performed, and images were reconstructed as linearly blended (LB) and 40 keV virtual monoenergetic (VMI) images. The AI tool PRAEVAorta®2 was used to assess arterial phase images for endoleaks. Two experienced readers independently evaluated the same images, and their consensus served as the reference standard. Key metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), were calculated. Results: The final analysis included 94 patients. The AI tool demonstrated an accuracy of 78.7%, precision of 67.6%, recall of 10 71.9%, F1 score of 69.7%, and an AUC of 0.77 using LB images. However, the tool failed to process 40 keV VMI images correctly, limiting further analysis of these datasets. Conclusions: The AI tool showed moderate diagnostic accuracy in detecting endoleaks using LB images but failed to achieve the reliability needed for clinical use due to the significant number of misdiagnoses.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: During total arch replacement (TAR) using frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique with Frozenix for true thoracic aortic aneurysm (tTAA), oversized FET tends to be chosen similar to the endovascular devise selection. However, the oversized FET is considered a risk factor for intimal injury. The appropriate size selection of FET remains insufficiently understood. METHODS: Between October 2014 and March 2022, a total of 49 patients underwent TAR using Frozenix for tTAA. Out of 49 patients, four patients planned to staged surgery were excluded, 19 patients were operated on with an undersized Frozenix compared with the descending aorta (undersized FET group) and in 26 patients an equal or oversized Frozenix was used (oversized FET group). Clinical outcomes and postoperative diameter changes were investigated. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 0%. The mean diameter of Frozenix and the descending aorta was 30.7 mm and 28.8 mm, respectively, in the oversized FET group, and 26.7 mm and 30.1 mm in the undersized FET group. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) demonstrated no endoleaks not only in the oversized FET group but also in the undersized FET group. CT also revealed that undersized FET had expanded more than the original diameter in all cases except for two, with an average of 2.47 ± 1.53 mm. Additionally, the descending aorta covered with Frozenix shrank in 10 patients (53%). Postoperative adverse aortic events were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Undersized Frozenix tightly fit the descending aorta and resulted in complete sealing without endoleaks. Oversized FET is not strictly necessary considering the size-related adverse complications.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Complex endovascular repair with fenestrated or branched stent grafts is a common approach for treating various types of aortic aneurysms. Bridging stent grafts (BSs) are crucial in connecting aortic endoprosthesis to target vessels, yet current options have demonstrated significant complications. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective single-center study evaluates the initial outcomes and durability of the iCover stent graft (iCover-SG) when used as a BS in fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR). METHODS: Retrospective analysis screened procedures for complex aortic aneurysms between August 2021 and January 2024. Patients who underwent FEVAR with iCover-SG as BS were included. Primary and secondary endpoints focused on freedom from iCover-SG-related target vessel instability, technical success, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Within the cohort of 28 patients, 94 iCover-SGs were used as BS, supplying 87 target vessels. The freedom from iCover-SG-related target vessel instability throughout the study reached 94% (82/87). Technical success rates were notably high, with primary success achieved in 94% of cases and secondary success in 99%. Over the follow-up duration, there were instances necessitating reintervention related to iCover-SG, including 4 cases of endoleak, 2 cases of T1cEL, and 2 cases of T3cEL. In-hospital mortality was 7% (n=4), with 2 cases attributed to intraoperative complications. Importantly, no deaths were directly attributed to iCover-SG-related issues. CONCLUSION: The iCover-SG demonstrates promising initial outcomes as a BS in FEVAR, with high technical success rates and satisfactory rates of target vessel instability. Continued monitoring and further studies are warranted to assess long-term durability and outcomes. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study shows that the iCover stent graft achieves satisfactory technical success and target vessel stability in the short- and mid-term when used as a bridging stent graft in FEVAR procedures. Its successful integration into clinical practice broadens the range of available options, providing clinicians with more versatile tools for managing complex endovascular aortic aneurysms. This expanded selection of bridging stent grafts allows for more personalised treatment strategies, improving procedural precision and patient outcomes. The iCover stent graft's reliable performance highlights its potential as a valuable addition to current endovascular techniques, ultimately enhancing patient care in challenging cases.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Aneurysmal degeneration of the common iliac artery (CIA) can pose a challenge to achieve distal landing zone sealing at the time of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The aim of this study was to summarize the current literature regarding the bell-bottom technique (BBT) for ectatic CIAs during EVAR. METHODS: This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible articles were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central published until April 2023. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects model and the I2 statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity. The primary endpoints were type Ib/III endoleak, graft occlusion/limb embolization, and reintervention rate. Secondary endpoints included perioperative adverse events and mortality. RESULTS: Overall, twenty-six studies and 4332 patients with flared limbs were included. The pooled estimate for type Ib/III endoleak was 4% (95% CI: 2-6, I2 = 85.6%), for reintervention rate was 9% (95% CI: 6-12, I2 = 90.4%), and for overall mortality was 10% (95% CI: 4-19, I2 = 97.3%). No aneurysm related deaths were recorded. Comparative analysis showed similar type Ib/III endoleak, graft occlusion, and reintervention rates between the EVAR BBT, iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE), and embolization of the internal iliac artery followed by extension of the iliac limb to the external iliac artery (EIE) groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of flared limbs could be considered a reasonable first line choice for EVAR cases with CIA ectasia as it is simpler, allows for future IBE or EIE and does not increase the risk for type Ib/III endoleak or graft occlusion. Further comparative studies with longer follow-up are needed.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and anatomical predictors of the complications of flared limb (FL) use for ectatic common iliac arteries accompanied by abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, we reviewed data from 391 patients (638 limbs) treated between 2005 and 2020. The cohort was divided into two groups. The standard limbs (SLs, n = 403) included stent graft (SG) of <20 mm in diameter and the FLs (n = 235) included stent graft of ≥20 mm in diameter. Complications within 30 days were investigated as the short-term outcome. Limb events during follow-up including type Ib endoleak (EL), type IIIa EL, and limb occlusion were compared between SLs and FLs using log-rank test. RESULTS: Early results indicated that the FL group had a significantly higher incidence of intraoperative type Ib EL at 5.1% (12), than 1.7% (7) in the SLs (p = .016). For 19 patients in whom intraoperative type Ib EL was discovered, SG extension alone or internal iliac artery embolization was all performed before completing the procedure. Overall, we noted one case of type Ib EL and two cases of limb events in each group at 30 days. Over a median follow-up of 39 months, 31 (4.9%) events (17 type Ib EL, 2 type IIIa EL, and 12 limb events), 13 (5.5%) in FLs and 18 (4.5%) in SLs (p = .984), were observed. The FLs had significantly higher rates of aortic sac enlargement, with 46 (19.6%) cases for FLs and 36 (8.9%) for SLs (p < .001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences at 5 years in SLs versus FLs for freedom from type Ib EL (96.6% vs 82.4%, respectively; p < .001) and no difference in freedom from limb events (94.7% vs 84.5%, respectively; p = .519). Furthermore, no difference was observed for overall survival and aneurysm-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although an FL for EVAR is used to treat dilated iliac arteries, there is an increased risk of intraoperative and late type Ib EL and aortic sac enlargement. Long-term close follow-up is mandatory, especially in the patients who undergo EVAR using FLs.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess viability and safety of preemptive treatment of type II endoleak for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs. METHODS: A 69-year-old man with renal fusion (horseshoe kidney) was referred for treatment of a 5.5 cm AAA. His anatomy was suitable for endovascular repair. The risk for type II endoleak was increased because of multiple infrarenal arterial orifices originating within the aneurysm sac. These included an accessory renal artery that supplied the renal isthmus, a patent inferior mesenteric artery, and a pair of large lumbar arteries originating from a single orifice (8 mm) at L3 spinal level. The lumbar orifice was selectively cannulated and occluded with thrombogenic coils 1 week prior to his endovascular aneurysm repair. RESULTS: Aneurysm repair was uneventful with no signs of early or delayed endoleak and long-term follow-up of 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive coil embolization of perianeurysmal arteries may be considered as a safe and effective strategy for management of potential type II endoleak.

RESUMEN

This review explores the applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in interventional radiology, focusing on its role in endoleak detection after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), periprocedural thermal ablation guidance, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CEUS offers a dynamic assessment for the detection of endoleak following EVAR, facilitating accurate diagnosis and classification. In periprocedural thermal ablation, CEUS enhances target lesion delineation with the visualization of real-time perfusion changes, optimizing treatment strategies and reducing residual tumor rates. Finally, CEUS has demonstrated efficacy in intraprocedural evaluation and postprocedural follow-up in TACE for HCC, offering early detection of residual tumor enhancement and providing an alternative for patients with contraindications to contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Overall, CEUS is a versatile and valuable tool with many applications to offer interventional radiologists enhanced diagnostic capabilities and improved patient management.

RESUMEN

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is widely used for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but has a 10% to 40% incidence of type II endoleak during follow-up. There are various techniques to treat these endoleaks in the case of enlarging of the AAA, but the clinical effectiveness is low. In recent years, preemptive AAA sac embolization has shown some encouraging results with significant AAA shrinkage. However, the presence of embolic material can complicate continued endoleak detection making assessment of treatment outcome difficult. We investigate the ability of contrast-enhanced-ultrasound examination to detect endoleaks in patients undergoing preemptive coil embolization of the AAA sac.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to analyse abdominal aneurysm sac thrombus density and volume on computed tomography (CT) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: Patients who underwent EVAR between January 2005 and December 2010 and had at least four follow-up CT exams available over the first five years of follow-up were included in this retrospective single-centre study. Thrombus density and aneurysm sac volume were calculated on unenhanced CT scans. Linear mixed models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Out of 82 patients, 44 (54%) had an endoleak on post-EVAR contrast-enhanced CT. Thrombus density significantly increased over time in both the endoleak and non-endoleak groups, with a slope of 0.159 UH/month (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.115-0.202), p < 0.0001) and 0.052 UH/month (95% CI 0.002-0.102, p = 0.041). In patients without endoleak, a significant decrease in aneurysm sac volume was identified over time (slope -0.891 cc/month, 95% CI -1.200 to -0.581); p < 0.001) compared to patients with endoleak (slope 0.284 cc/month, 95% CI -0.031 to 0.523, p = 0.082). The association between thrombus density and aneurysm sac volume was positive in the endoleak group (slope 1.543 UH/cc, 95% CI 0.948-2.138, p < 0.001) and negative in the non-endoleak group (slope -1.450 UH/cc, 95% CI -2.326 to -0.574, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: We observed a progressive increase in thrombus density of the aneurysm sac after EVAR in patients with and without endoleak, more pronounced in patients with endoleak. The association between aneurysm volume and thrombus density was positive in patients with and negative in those without endoleak. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A progressive increase in thrombus density and volume of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac on unenhanced CT might suggest underlying endoleak lately after EVAR. KEY POINTS: Thrombus density of the aneurysm sac after EVAR increased over time. Progressive increase in thrombus density was significantly associated to the underlying endoleak. The association between aneurysm volume and thrombus density was positive in patients with and negative in those without endoleak.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Endoleaks are common complications following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). They can be classified into low-pressure and high-pressure endoleaks. High-pressure endoleaks, which include Type I and Type III endoleaks, pose a significant risk of rupture and require urgent treatment. The aim of our study is to review published case reports and case series to assess the impact of Type IIIb endoleaks in EVAR and to identify possible mechanisms contributing to these endoleaks. This review targeted case reports and case series published between January 1998 and December 2022. A total of 62 case reports and case series were identified, encompassing 156 patients with Type IIIb endoleaks. Data collection was performed by three consultants who thoroughly discussed each report before registering it into an analyzable data set. Our analysis revealed that, beyond material imperfections, certain endograft configurations or conformations, endograft redundancy, and the physical forces acting on the grafts may lead to increased stress on specific parts of the endografts, potentially exceeding their design limits. Factors contributing to redundancy and unfavorable conformation of the endograft include secondary interventions for any cause (such as other types of endoleaks), EVAR performed outside the instructions for use (IFUs), endograft migrations, or larger initial aneurysm diameter.

RESUMEN

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) are life-threatening and require emergent surgical therapy. Endovascular aortic repair for rupture (rEVAR) has become the leading strategy due to its minimal invasive approach with expected lower morbidity and mortality, especially in patients presenting with hemodynamic instability and relevant comorbidities. Following rEVAR, intraoperative angiography or early postinterventional computed tomography angiography have to exclude early type 1 or 3 endoleaks requiring immediate reintervention. Persistent type 2 endoleaks (T2ELs) after rEVAR, in contrast to elective cases, can cause possibly lethal situations due to continuing extravascular blood loss through the remaining aortic aneurysm rupture site. Therefore, early identification of relevant persistent T2ELs associated with continuous bleeding and hemodynamic instability and immediate management is mandatory in the acute postoperative setting following rEVAR. Different techniques and concepts for the occlusion of T2ELs after rEVAR are available, and most of them are also used for relevant T2ELs after elective EVAR. In addition to various interventional embolization procedures for persistent T2ELs, some patients require open surgical occlusion of T2EL-feeding arteries, abdominal compartment decompression or direct surgical patch occlusion of the aneurysm rupture site after rEVAR. So far, in the acute situation of rAAAs, indications for preemptive or intraoperative T2EL embolization during rEVAR have not been established. In the long term, persistent T2ELs after rEVAR can lead to continuous aneurysm expansion with the possible development of secondary proximal type I endoleaks and an increased risk of re-rupture requiring regular follow-up and early consideration for reintervention. To date, only very few studies have investigated T2ELs after rEVAR or compared outcomes with those from elective EVAR regarding the special aspects of persisting T2ELs. This narrative review is intended to present the current knowledge on the incidence, natural history, relevance and strategies for T2EL management after rEVAR.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study assesses the efficacy and safety of self-expandable (SE) versus balloon-expandable (BE) stent grafts for managing visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs), focusing on procedural success and complication rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of VAA patients treated at our institution from April 2006 to September 2021. The study reviewed patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes, including endoleaks. RESULTS: Among the 23 patients analyzed, splenic artery aneurysms represented 44% of cases. Fifteen patients were treated with balloon-expandable stent grafts (BE SGs), and eight patients were treated with self-expandable stent grafts (SE SGs). For saccular aneurysms, the average neck size was 10.10 ± 8.70 mm in the BE group versus 18.50 ± 3.40 mm in the SE group (p = 0.23), with an average sac size of 20.10 ± 18.9 mm in the BE group versus 15.60 ± 12.7 mm in the SE group (p = 0.16). The average sac-to-neck ratio was 1.69 ± 2.23 in the BE group versus 1.38 ± 0.33 in the SE group (p = 0.63). The BE group exhibited a significantly higher endoleak rate (60%) compared to the SE group (12.5%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: While further investigation is needed to fully assess the outcomes of stent graft treatment for VAAs, initial data show a significantly higher endoleak rate with BE SGs compared to SE SGs. The SE SGs may offer better outcomes due to their superior ability to conform to tortuous and mobile visceral arteries.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Metallic and hyperdense artifacts and T1-shortening substances in the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac generated by embolic materials and lipiodol pose challenges in the identification of endoleaks on follow-up computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI (CES-MRI) for detecting endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) with intraoperative AAA sac embolization compared with CE-CT, this study was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, 28 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR with prophylactic AAA sac embolization were included. All patients underwent CES-MRI and CE-CT to detect endoleaks. The definitive diagnosis of endoleaks was a consensus reading of CE-CT and CES-MRI by two certified radiologists, in addition to angiography or reproducible radiological findings in the observational examination. Analysis was performed to evaluate which examination was better for detecting endoleaks. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of CE-CT and CES-MRI according to observer 1 were 50%, 100%, and 0.813 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.625-1.00) and 100%, 95%, and 0.997 (95% CI = 0.984-1.00), respectively, and those according to observer 2 were 50%, 100%, and 0.750 (95% CI = 0.514-0.986) and 100%, 95%, and 0.969 (95% CI = 0.903-1.00), respectively. Intolerable artifacts were significantly observed on CE-CT. The severity of the artifacts did not depend on the stent graft on CT and MRI. CONCLUSION: Although no significant difference was observed, CES-MRI tended to have better accuracy for endoleak detection in EVAR with intraoperative AAA sac embolization than CE-CT.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This technical note presents a case of a patient with a failed Nellix device (Endologix, Irvine, Calif) who was not deemed fit for open conversion. Our planned approach for repair involved an endovascular procedure utilizing a custom-made branched device. TECHNIQUE: An endovascular repair was performed via a custom-made four outer branched device in conjunction with a custom-made bifurcated graft featuring inverted limbs (Cook Inc., Bloomington, Ind). All branches were connected to the target vessel with Gore Viabahn VBX balloon-expandable covered stents (Gore & Associates Inc.). CONCLUSION: Endovascular conversion with branched endovascular repair in a patient not deemed fit for open surgery was successfully performed, thereby reducing the risk of a high morbid and mortal procedure. CLINICAL IMPACT: Novel useful treatment solution of failed EVAR with Nellix device.

RESUMEN

This study highlights a case of late open conversion repair (OCR) for persistent Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), presenting a 78-year-old male with a history of EVAR for an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Despite conservative management of the initial endoleak, the aneurysm sac's progressive growth necessitated open reconstruction to salvage the graft. Successful postoperative outcomes emphasize the critical need for meticulous intervention strategies and surveillance in managing persistent Type II endoleaks. This case underlines the importance of a tailored approach, leveraging both endovascular and open surgical techniques, to optimize long-term outcomes and prevent aneurysm rupture in complex cases.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm has gradually gained increasing attention. We present a case of a patient with an expanding aneurysm after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for a type II endoleak, in which successful direct ligations of the intercostal artery were performed using a sac incision without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or graft replacement. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old male patient, previously treated with TEVAR for a descending thoracic aortic aneurysm, presented with ongoing chest discomfort. Based on the diagnosis of a growing aneurysm and type II endoleak, the patient was prepared for CPB and aortic cross-clamping, as a precautions against the possibility of a type I endoleak. A longitudinal opening of the thoracic aortic aneurysm sac was performed following left thoracotomy. Visual confirmation identified the T5 level intercostal artery as the source of the endoleak, and after confirming the absence of a type I endoleak, multiple ligations were applied to the intercostal artery. Follow-up computed tomography confirmed the absence of endoleaks or sac growth. CONCLUSION: In a case involving TEVAR for a thoracic aortic aneurysm, open suture ligations were used to treat type II endoleaks without having to resort to CPB, resulting in successful outcomes.

Asunto(s)