RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical, immunologic, and patient-centered outcomes of enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) on excisional wounds in palatal mucosa. MATERIALS: Forty-four patients in need of ridge preservation were randomly allocated into two groups: control group (n = 22): open palatal wound after free gingival graft (FGG) harvest and EMD group (n = 22): open palatal wound after FGG harvest that received 0.3 ml of EMD. Clinical and patient-centered parameters were analyzed for 3 months post-treatment. Wound fluid levels of inflammatory markers were assessed 3 and 7 days postoperatively. RESULTS: No significant inter-group difference was observed in remaining wound area and re-epithelialization. EMD and control groups achieved wound closure and re-epithelialization 30 days postoperatively (p < .001), without inter-group differences. Similarly, number of analgesics and Oral Health Impact Profile scores did not present significant inter-group differences (p > .05). EMD appeared to selectively modulate wound fluid levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, matrix metallopeptidase 9, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that EMD application to excisional palatal wounds using the investigated protocol does not provide clinical healing benefits, despite an apparent modulation of selected inflammatory markers.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas del Esmalte Dental , Recesión Gingival , Esmalte Dental , Humanos , Membrana Mucosa , Hueso Paladar/cirugía , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic and patient-centered results of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) therapy in intrabony defects in aggressive periodontitis (AgP) patients and compare them with those in chronic periodontitis (CP) patients. METHODS: Sixty intrabony defects in AgP and CP patients associated with ≥ 6 mm residual probing pocket depth (PPD) were included and randomly assigned to one of three groups: AgP+CS (conservative surgery) (n = 20); AgP+CS/EMD (n = 20); CP+CS/EMD (n = 20). Clinical parameters were measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Defect resolution (DR) and bone filling (BF) were used for radiographic analysis. The quality of life was recorded at baseline and 6 months using OHIP-14 and VAS scale in the early post-therapy period. RESULTS: PPD and relative clinical attachment level (rCAL) improved for all groups during follow-up (P ≤ 0.05), and AgP+CS/EMD presented a higher rCAL gain (2.4 ± 1.0 mm) when compared to AgP control patients (1.6 ± 1.6 mm, P ≤ 0.05) after 12 months. No difference was observed between AgP+CS/EMD and CP+CS/EMD groups (P > 0.05). No radiographic differences were observed among groups at any time point (P > 0.05). All the groups reported a positive impact on OHIP-14 total score, without differences among them. CONCLUSIONS: EMD therapy of intrabony defects promotes additional benefits in AgP patients, presenting a similar regeneration rate compared to CP patients, and has proven to be a viable therapy for the treatment of individuals with AgP.
Asunto(s)
Periodontitis Agresiva , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar , Proteínas del Esmalte Dental , Periodontitis Agresiva/diagnóstico por imagen , Periodontitis Agresiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Periodontitis Agresiva/cirugía , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Regeneración Tisular Guiada Periodontal , Humanos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Pérdida de la Inserción Periodontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Pérdida de la Inserción Periodontal/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The recognition of a periodontal therapy as a regenerative procedure requires the demonstration of new cementum, periodontal ligament, and bone coronal to the base of the defect. A diversity of regenerative strategies has been evaluated, including root surface conditioning, bone grafts and bone substitute materials, guided tissue regeneration, enamel matrix proteins, growth/differentiation factors, combined therapies and, more recently, tissue-engineering approaches. The aim of this chapter of Periodontology 2000 is to review the research carried out in Latin America in the field of periodontal regeneration, focusing mainly on studies using preclinical models (animal models) and randomized controlled clinical trials. This review may help clinicians and researchers to evaluate the current status of the therapies available and to discuss the challenges that must be faced in order to achieve predictable periodontal regeneration in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Sustitutos de Huesos , Proteínas del Esmalte Dental , Regeneración Tisular Dirigida , Animales , Cemento Dental , Regeneración Tisular Guiada Periodontal , Humanos , Ligamento Periodontal , PeriodonciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Considering xenogeneic collagen matrix (CM) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD) characteristics, it is suggested that their combination could promote superior clinical outcomes in root coverage procedures. Thus, the aim of this parallel, double-masked, dual-center, randomized clinical trial is to evaluate clinical outcomes after treatment of localized gingival recession (GR) by a coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with CM and/or EMD. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients presenting one Miller Class I or II GRs were randomly assigned to receive either CAF (n = 17); CAF + CM (n = 17); CAF + EMD (n = 17), or CAF + CM + EMD (n = 17). Recession height, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and keratinized tissue width and thickness were measured at baseline and 90 days and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The obtained root coverage was 68.04% ± 24.11% for CAF; 87.20% ± 15.01% for CAF + CM; 88.77% ± 20.66% for CAF + EMD; and 91.59% ± 11.08% for CAF + CM + EMD after 6 months. Groups that received biomaterials showed greater values (P <0.05). Complete root coverage (CRC) for CAF + EMD was 70.59%, significantly superior to CAF alone (23.53%); CAF + CM (52.94%), and CAF + CM + EMD (51.47%) (P <0.05). Keratinized tissue thickness gain was significant only in CM-treated groups (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The three approaches are superior to CAF alone for root coverage. EMD provides highest levels of CRC; however, the addition of CM increases gingival thickness. The combination approach does not seem justified.
Asunto(s)
Colágeno/uso terapéutico , Esmalte Dental/trasplante , Recesión Gingival/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Recesión Gingival/tratamiento farmacológico , Recesión Gingival/cirugía , Gingivoplastia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is still unclear whether enamel matrix proteins (EMD) as adjunct to bone grafting enhance bone healing. This study compared histomorphometrically maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with ß-TCP/HA in combination with or without EMD in humans. METHODS: In ten systemically healthy patients needing bilateral MSFA, one side was randomly treated using ß-TCP/HA mixed with EMD (BC + EMD) and the other side using only ß-TCP/HA (BC). After 6 months, biopsies were harvested from grafted areas during implant installation, being histologically and histomorphometrically analyzed. Differences between the groups considering new bone formation, soft tissues, and remaining BC were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: All patients showed uneventful healing after MSFA, and dental implant installation was possible in all patients after 6 months. Histological analysis showed newly formed bone that was primarily woven in nature; it was organized in thin trabeculae, and it was occasionally in contact with residual bone substitute particles, which appeared in various forms and sizes and in advanced stage of degradation. Mean bone area was 43.4% (CI95 38.9; 47.8) for the BC group and 43.0% (CI95 36.6; 49.5) for the BC + EMD group. Mean soft tissue area was 21.3% (CI95 16.5; 26.2) for BC group and 21.5% (CI95 17.7; 25.3) for BC + EMD group, while the remaining biomaterial was 35.3% (CI95 36.6; 49.5) and 35.5% (CI95 29.6; 41.3) for BC and BC + EMD group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MSFA with BC resulted in adequate amounts of new bone formation allowing successful implant installation; adding EMD did not have a significant effect.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Alcohol intake may interfere with bone metabolism; however, there is a lack of information about the outcomes of regenerative approaches in the presence of alcohol intake. Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been used in periodontal regenerative procedures resulting in improvement of clinical parameters. Thus, the aim of this histomorphometric study is to evaluate the healing of periodontal defects after treatment with EMD under the influence of alcohol intake. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty Wistar rats were randomly assigned to two groups: G1 = alcohol intake (n = 10) and G2 = non-exposed to alcohol intake (n = 10). Thirty days after initiation of alcohol intake, fenestration defects were created at the buccal aspect of the first mandibular molar of all animals from both groups. After the surgeries, the defects of each animal were randomly assigned to two subgroups: non-treated control and treated with EMD. The animals were killed 21 d later. RESULTS: G1 showed less defect fill for non-treated controls. Bone density (BD) and new cementum formation were lower for G1 when compared to G2, for EMD-treated and non-treated sites. EMD treatment resulted in greater BD and new cementum formation in both groups and defect fill was not significantly different between groups in the EMD-treated sites. The number of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive osteoclasts was significantly higher in G1 when compared to G2 and in EMD-treated sites of both groups. CONCLUSION: Alcohol intake may produce a significant detrimental effect on BD and new cementum formation, even in sites treated with EMD. A limited positive effect may be expected after EMD treatment under this condition.
Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea , Alcoholes , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Cemento Dental , Esmalte Dental , Proteínas del Esmalte Dental , Ratas , Ratas WistarRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Psychologic stress and clinical hypercortisolism have been related to direct effects on bone metabolism. However, there is a lack of information regarding the outcomes of regenerative approaches under the influence of chronic stress (CS). Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been used in periodontal regenerative procedures, resulting in improvement of clinical parameters. Thus, the aim of this histomorphometric study is to evaluate the healing of periodontal defects after treatment with EMD under the influence of CS in the rat model. METHODS: Twenty Wistar rats were randomly assigned to two groups; G1: CS (restraint stress for 12 hours/day) (n = 10), and G2: not exposed to CS (n = 10). Fifteen days after initiation of CS, fenestration defects were created at the buccal aspect of the first mandibular molar of all animals from both groups. After the surgeries, the defects of each animal were randomly assigned to two subgroups: non-treated control and treated with EMD. The animals were euthanized 21 days later. RESULTS: G1 showed less bone density (BD) compared to G2. EMD provided an increased defect fill (DF) in G1 and higher BD and new cementum formation (NCF) in both groups. The number of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive osteoclasts was significantly higher in G1 when compared to G2 and in EMD-treated sites of both groups. CONCLUSIONS: CS may produce a significant detrimental effect on BD. EMD may provide greater DF compared to non-treated control in the presence of CS and increased BD and NCF in the presence or absence of CS.