RESUMEN

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is a disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) strain. Many anticancer compounds have been repurposed as effective anti-coronavirus agents and are currently in a clinical trial to be evaluated for treatment. Elacestrant is a novel selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD). A fingerprint Tanimoto-based 2-dimensional similarity search was performed in the PubChem database using elacestrant as a prototype. The chemical compounds were downloaded, and virtual screening, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics were further used to identify the most active molecules in the binding pocket SARS-COV-2 main protease. Eight compounds with superior docking score, gscore, and glide binding energy were identified. Molecular dynamic simulations (MD) were performed at 100 ns to remove the false interactions between the receptor and the active ligands. The results showed that all the compounds displayed good stability. Further, the ADMET results showed that compounds CID58023104 was observed to be deemed a hit compound; hence, CID58023104 and could be optimize, derivatize, and explore for further development as an anti-coronavirus agent targeting SARS-COV-2 main protease.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Primary and acquired endocrine resistance remains a major issue in the treatment of hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Acquired resistance often results from estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations leading to estrogen independent estrogen receptor activation. Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) induce degradation of this receptor, thereby overcoming this resistance. The intramuscular administration and modest efficacy of fulvestrant, the first SERD, triggered development of oral, more potent SERDs. This narrative review gives an overview of the current evidence regarding this new drug class. METHODS: Medline/PubMed and Embase database were screened using a systematic search strategy. We assessed the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium abstract reports, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting resources by applying the following terms: 'SERD', 'giredestrant', 'elacestrant', 'imlunestrant', 'amcenestrant', 'camizestrant' and 'rintodestrant'. CLINICALTRIALS: gov was consulted to include ongoing trials. RESULTS: The search retrieved 1191 articles. After screening, 108 articles were retained. In the phase 3 EMERALD trial, elacestrant demonstrated benefit in progression free survival (PFS) in second line metastatic disease in postmenopausal women or men, leading to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval for the ESR1 mutated population. This PFS advantage was more pronounced among patients who had priorly received at least 12 months of a cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). In the phase 2 SERENA-2 trial, camizestrant improved PFS as second line treatment. However, trials of giredestrant and amcenestrant failed to show PFS benefit in second line metastatic setting. In the preoperative setting, several oral SERDs resulted in a significant reduction of tumoral proliferation. Furthermore, many trials are still in progress. CONCLUSION: Oral SERDs constitute an exciting new drug class. Ongoing and future research will further refine the role of these drugs next to standard endocrine treatments and targeted therapies.

RESUMEN

For patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) progressed on first-line endocrine therapy plus a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i), fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) administered intramuscularly, represented the only monotherapy option until the approval of elacestrant. This oral SERD has been approved for patients with ESR1-mutant HR+/HER2- mBC by the European Medicines Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, according to the results of the randomized phase III EMERALD trial, which demonstrated elacestrant superiority over standard endocrine monotherapy. Consequently, elacestrant has been incorporated in the European Society for Medical Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. However, in Europe, the access to this recommended drug depends on the decision of the National Health Authorities of each state. In this communication, we describe the main results and implications of the EMERALD trial, in the context of the biomarker-driven algorithm for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC progressed on CDK4/6i, and conclude that a subgroup of patients with ESR1-mutant tumors and specific clinical features can really derive a clinically meaningful benefit from elacestrant, sparing access to more toxic combination approaches and preserving the quality of life.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer with ESR1 mutations presents a significant therapeutic challenge due to its adaptive resistance mechanisms to chemotherapy, especially endocrine treatment. Elacestrant, a novel oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), has emerged as a promising agent in this treatment-resistant era. Method: A comprehensive search was conducted on pivotal clinical trials, including the RAD1901-005 Trial, EMERALD TRIAL, ELIPSE, and ELEVATE, focusing on their methodologies, patient populations, treatment regimens, and outcomes. Discussion: This narrative review describes the available preclinical and clinical evidence on elacestrant, focusing on its pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety within the existing literature. Elacestrant has demonstrated excellent activity against ESR1 mutations associated with resistance to first-line endocrine therapies. Clinical trials have shown improved progression-free survival in patients with advanced ER+/HER2-, ESR1-mutated breast cancer. Safety profiles indicate a tolerable side effect spectrum consistent with other agents. Its oral bioavailability offers a convenient alternative to injectable SERDs, with potential implications for patient adherence and quality of life. The review also discusses the comparative efficacy of elacestrant relative to existing endocrine therapies and its possible use in combination regimens. Conclusion: Ongoing clinical trials assessing elacestrant and other SERDs will yield data that might aid clinicians in determining the optimal selection and order of endocrine treatment drugs for ER+ breast cancer. The integration of targeted and immunotherapeutic agents with traditional chemotherapy represents a pivotal shift in Breast Cancer treatment, moving towards more personalized and effective regimens.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in women, and is characterized by its heterogeneity; exhibiting various subgroups identifiable through molecular biomarkers that also serve as predictive indicators. More than two thirds of breast tumors are classified as luminal with positive hormone receptors (HR), indicating that cancer cells proliferation is promoted by hormones. Endocrine therapies play a vital role in the effective treatment of breast cancer by manipulating the signaling of estrogen receptors (ER), leading to a reduction in cell proliferation and growth rate. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), such as tamoxifen and toremifene, function by blocking estrogen's effects. Aromatase inhibitors (AI), including anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, suppress estrogen production. On the other hand, selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), like fulvestrant, act by blocking and damaging estrogen receptors. Tamoxifen and AI are widely used both in early- and advanced-stage disease, while fulvestrant is used as a single agent or in combination with other agents like the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors (palbociclib, abemaciclib, ribociclib) or alpelisib for advanced-stage disease. Currently, SERDs are recognized as an effective therapeutic approach for the treatment of ER-positive breast cancer, showing proficiency in reducing and blocking ER signaling. This review aims to outline the ongoing development of novel oral SERDs from a practical therapeutic perspective, enhancing our understanding of the mechanisms of action underlying these compounds.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most common breast cancer subtype, and therapeutic management relies primarily on inhibiting ER signaling. In the metastatic setting, ER signaling is typically targeted by selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the latter of which prevent estrogen production. Activating ESR1 mutations are among the most common emergent breast cancer mutations and confer resistance to AIs. AREAS COVERED: Until 2023, fulvestrant was the only approved SERD; fulvestrant is administered intramuscularly, and in some cases may also have limited efficacy in the setting of certain ESR1 mutations. In 2023, the first oral SERD, elacestrant, was approved for use in ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer and represents a new class of therapeutic options. While the initial approval was as monotherapy, ongoing studies are evaluating elacestrant (as well as other oral SERDs) in combination with other therapies including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors, which parallels the current combination uses of fulvestrant. EXPERT OPINION: Elacestrant's recent approval sheds light on the use of biomarkers such as ESR1 to gauge a tumor's endocrine sensitivity. Ongoing therapeutic and correlative biomarker studies will offer new insight and expanding treatment options for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Elacestrant, a novel oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on January 27, 2023, for use in patients with ER and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer whose tumors harbor an ESR1 missense mutation (ESR1-mut), after at least one line of endocrine therapy (ET). The FDA made its decision based on the randomized phase 3 EMERALD trial, which met its primary endpoint of improved median progression-free survival (mPFS) with elacestrant monotherapy versus standard-of-care endocrine monotherapy in the overall intention to treat population; however, this benefit was largely driven by the ESR1-mut cohort. Elacestrant is a dose-dependent mixed ER agonist/antagonist, which at high doses acts as a direct ER antagonist as well as selective downregulator of ER. It is 11% bioavailable, primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 in the liver and excreted in feces. This leads to drug-drug interactions with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers, such as itraconazole and rifampin, respectively. In accordance with its clearance route, dose reduction is recommended in patients with moderate hepatic dysfunction but not in renal dysfunction. Studies evaluating elacestrant in severe hepatic dysfunction as well as in patients from racial and ethnic minority groups are ongoing. Overall, elacestrant is the first orally bioavailable SERD approved by the FDA for use in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Current clinical trials are ongoing evaluating it in the adjuvant setting in patients with early stage ER-positive breast cancers.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer initially responds to serial courses of endocrine therapy, but ultimately becomes refractory. Elacestrant, a new generation FDA-approved oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) and antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy in a subset of women with advanced HR+breast cancer, but there are few patient-derived models to characterize its effect in advanced cancers with diverse treatment histories and acquired mutations. METHODS: We analyzed clinical outcomes with elacestrant, compared with endocrine therapy, among women who had previously been treated with a fulvestrant-containing regimen from the recent phase 3 EMERALD Study. We further modeled sensitivity to elacestrant, compared with the currently approved SERD, fulvestrant in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and cultured circulating tumor cells (CTCs). RESULTS: Analysis of the subset of breast cancer patients enrolled in the EMERALD study who had previously received a fulvestrant-containing regimen indicates that they had better progression-free survival with elacestrant than with standard-of-care endocrine therapy, a finding that was independent estrogen receptor (ESR1) gene mutations. We modeled elacestrant responsiveness using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and in ex vivo cultured CTCs derived from patients with HR+breast cancer extensively treated with multiple endocrine therapies, including fulvestrant. Both CTCs and PDX models are refractory to fulvestrant but sensitive to elacestrant, independent of mutations in ESR1 and Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PIK3CA) genes. CONCLUSION: Elacestrant retains efficacy in breast cancer cells that have acquired resistance to currently available ER targeting therapies. Elacestrant may be an option for patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer whose disease progressed on fulvestrant in the metastatic setting. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Serial endocrine therapy is the mainstay of management for metastatic HR+breast cancer, but acquisition of drug resistance highlights the need for better therapies. Elacestrant is a recently FDA-approved novel oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), with demonstrated efficacy in the EMERALD phase 3 clinical trial of refractory HR+breast cancer. Subgroup analysis of the EMERALD clinical trial identifies clinical benefit with elacestrant in patients who had received prior fulvestrant independent of the mutational status of the ESR1 gene, supporting its potential utility in treating refractory HR+breast cancer. Here, we use pre-clinical models, including ex vivo cultures of circulating tumor cells and patient-derived xenografts, to demonstrate the efficacy of elacestrant in breast cancer cells with acquired resistance to fulvestrant.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Elacestrant was approved by the US FDA on January 27, 2023, for treating postmenopausal women or adult men with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, ESR1-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression prior to using at least one line of endocrine therapy. In this short perspective, physicochemical properties, dosage and administration, mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug interaction, and treatment-related adverse reactions of elacestrant are summarized.

RESUMEN

Elacestrant (RAD-1901), a selective estrogen receptor degrader, was approved by USFDA on January 27, 2023, for the treatment of breast cancer. It has been developed by Menarini Group under the brand name Orserdu®. Elacestrant showed anticancer activity both in vitro and in vivo in ER+ HER2-positive breast cancer models. The present review delebrates the development stages of Elacestrant, with its medicinal chemistry, synthesis, mechanism of action, and pharmacokinetic studies. Clinical data and safety profile has also been discussed, including data from randomized trials.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Discovery of SERDs has changed the direction of anticancer research, as more than 70% of breast cancer cases are estrogen receptor positive (ER+). Therapies such as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) and aromatase inhibitors (AI's) have been effective, but due to endocrine resistance, SERDs are now considered essential therapeutics for the treatment of ER+ breast cancer. The present review deliberates the pathophysiology of SERDs from the literature covering various molecules in clinical trials. Estrogen receptors active sites distinguishing characteristics and interactions with currently available FDA-approved drugs have also been discussed. Designing strategy of previously reported SERDs, their SAR analysis, in silico, and the biological efficacy have also been summarized along with appropriate examples.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The rise of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors has rapidly reshaped treatment algorithms for hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer, with endocrine treatment (ET) plus a CDK4/6-inhibitor currently representing the standard of care in the first line setting. However, treatment selection for those patients experiencing progression while on ET + CDK4/6-inhibitors remains challenging due to the suboptimal activity or significant toxicities of the currently available options. There is also a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of older regimens, such as everolimus + exemestane, post-CDK4/6 inhibition. In this setting of high unmet need, several clinical trials of novel drugs have recently reported encouraging results: the addition of the AKT-inhibitor capivasertib to fulvestrant demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS); the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) elacestrant prolonged PFS compared to traditional ET in a phase 3 trial, particularly among patients with detectable ESR1 mutations; finally, PARP inhibitors are available treatment options for patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 germline mutations. Overall, a plethora of novel endocrine and biologic treatment options are finally filling the gap between first-line ET and later line chemotherapy. In this review article, we recapitulate the activity of these novel treatment options and their potential role in future treatment algorithms.

RESUMEN

Breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer mortality in women. Endocrine therapy is the backbone treatment for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, the most common subtype. Although several endocrine therapy agents are available, essentially all HR-positive metastatic breast cancers will become resistant to these drugs. ESR1 mutations represent an important mechanism of resistance to aromatase inhibitors. Elacestrant is a novel oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that selectively binds to the estrogen receptor in breast cancer cells, inhibiting tumor growth. Preclinical data suggested greater efficacy of elacestrant in combination with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) or everolimus. In a Phase III clinical trial, elacestrant demonstrated a significant although modest improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) compared to standard of care endocrine therapy in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Importantly, there was also a significant benefit in patients with ESR1 mutations, which led to the FDA approval of elacestrant in this patient group. Elacestrant was generally well tolerated, with main side effects being upper gastrointestinal symptoms. There are several ongoing clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of elacestrant in the early setting as well as in combination with other targeted agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Other novel oral SERDs are also currently being evaluated in the treatment of HR-positive breast cancer. Results of ongoing clinical trials with these drugs will help clinicians decide the best sequence and combination of endocrine therapy agents.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of elacestrant (ELA) and standard-of-care (SOC) as second-/third-line treatment for pretreated estrogen receptor (ER)- positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer (A/MBC) in the US. Methods: The 3 health states partitioned survival model (PSM) was conducted from the perspective of the US third-party payers. The time horizon for the model lasted 10 years. Effectiveness and safety data were derived from the EMERALD trial (NCT03778931). Costs were derived from the pricing files of Medicare and Medicaid Services, and utility values were derived from published studies. One-way sensitivity analysis as well as probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to observe model stability. Result: ELA led to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $8,672,360/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with SOC in the overall population and $2,900,560/QALY gained compared with fulvestrant (FUL) in the ESR1(estrogen receptor 1) mutation subgroup. The two ICERs of ELA were significantly higher than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold values of $150,000/QALY. Conclusions: ELA was not cost-effective for the second-/third-line treatment of patients with ER+/HER2-A/MBC compared with SOC in the US.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) and full receptor antagonist provides an important therapeutic option for hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. Endocrine therapies include tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), that exhibits receptor agonist and antagonist activity, and aromatase inhibitors that block estrogen biosynthesis but which demonstrate acquired resistance. Fulvestrant, the only currently approved SERD, is limited by poor drug-like properties. A key focus for improving disease management has been development of oral SERDs with optimized target occupancy and potency and superior clinical efficacy. AREAS COVERED: Using PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, and congress websites, this review explored the preclinical development and clinical pharmacokinetics from early phase clinical studies (2015 or later) of novel oral SERDs, including giredestrant, amcenestrant, camizestrant, elacestrant, and rintodestrant. EXPERT OPINION: Numerous oral SERDs are in clinical development, aiming to form the core endocrine therapy for HR-positive breast cancer. Through property- and structure-based drug design of estrogen receptor-binding, antagonism, degradation, anti-proliferation, and pharmacokinetic properties, these SERDs have distinct profiles which impact clinical dosing, efficacy, and safety. Assuming preliminary safety and activity data are confirmed in phase 3 trials, these promising agents could further improve the management, outcomes, and quality of life in HR-positive breast cancer.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Elacestrant is an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader. This phase 1b open-label, non-randomized study (RAD1901-106) was initiated to determine the effect of elacestrant on the availability of ER in lesions from postmenopausal women with ER+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) using 16α-18F-fluoro-17ß-estradiol positron emission tomography with low-dose computed tomography (FES-PET/CT). METHODS: Eligible patients were postmenopausal women with ER+, HER2- ABC; tumor progression after ≥ 6 months of 1-3 lines of endocrine treatment for ABC; and measurable or evaluable disease. Two 8-patient cohorts were enrolled: one treated with 400 mg elacestrant once daily (QD) and one treated with 200 mg elacestrant QD with dose escalation to 400 mg QD after 14 days. Elacestrant was dosed continuously until progressive disease, toxicity, or withdrawal. FES-PET/CT was performed pre-dose at baseline and 4 h post-dose on day 14. The primary endpoint was the percentage difference in FES uptake in tumor lesions (maximum 20) after 14 days of treatment compared to baseline. Overall response was investigator-assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1. RESULTS: Patients (n = 16; median age, 53.5 years) had ABC with a median 2.5 prior lines of endocrine therapy. Median reduction in tumor FES uptake from baseline to day 14 was 89.1% (Q1, Q3: 75.1%, 94.1%) and was similar in both cohorts (89.1% [Q1, Q3: 67.4%, 94.2%], 200/400 mg and 88.7% [Q1, Q3: 79.5%, 94.1%], 400 mg). Residual ER availability (> 25% persistence in FES uptake) on day 14 was observed in 3 patients receiving 200/400 mg (3/78, 37.5%) and 1 patient receiving 400 mg (1/8, 12.5%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 11.1% (1 partial response), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 30.8%. Median percentage change in FES uptake did not correlate with ORR or CBR. Adverse events occurring in > 20% of the patients were nausea (68.8%), fatigue (50.0%), dyspepsia (43.8%), vomiting (37.5%), and decreased appetite, dysphagia, and hot flush (31.3% each). Most events were grade 2 in severity. CONCLUSION: Elacestrant 200 mg and 400 mg QD greatly reduced ER availability measured by FES-PET/CT. In a heavily pretreated population, elacestrant was associated with antitumor activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02650817 . Registered on 08 January 2016.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Most breast cancers express the estrogen receptor (ER) receptor and are negative for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor. ER+/HER2- cancers are treated with hormone-based therapies in the adjuvant setting and derive significant survival benefit from these therapies in the metastatic setting. However, hormone resistance develops in most metastatic patients. An increased understanding of the biology of ER+/HER2- breast cancers has led to the development of new therapies for this disease including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors. Several other neoplastic processes are targeted by novel drugs in clinical development, addressing cancer vulnerabilities. These include newer ways to block the ER and targeting the HER2 receptors in ER+/HER2- cancers expressing HER2 in low levels not qualifying for clinical positivity. In addition, promising therapeutic options include targeting other surface receptors or their downstream pathways, as well as targeting the apoptotic machinery and boosting the immune response which is initially insufficient in these cancers. A selection of new drugs in advanced development for ER+/HER2- breast cancer will be discussed in this review.

Asunto(s)