RESUMEN

Certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) who are responsible for airway management, may lack adequate continuing education for emergency front of neck access (EFONA), an advanced skill necessary in situations when a patient cannot be intubated and cannot be oxygenated (CICO). The purpose of this study was to improve CRNA knowledge and confidence when performing a scalpel-bougie cricothyrotomy for EFONA in a CICO event through the implementation of a spaced learning intervention. Thirteen CRNAs at a 160-bed community hospital participated in a 3-week educational intervention. Week 1: online preintervention survey followed by an educational video. Week 2: video review and skills component practiced on a cricothyrotomy trainer. Week 3: skills component practiced on a cricothyrotomy trainer followed by postintervention survey. This was a single-arm study and Wilcoxon sign ranked tests and a paired t-test were utilized to monitor for change in CRNA knowledge, confidence, and skill in performing EFONA. Implementation of a 3-week spaced learning program for educating CRNAs to perform a scalpel-bougie cricothyrotomy significantly increased CRNA knowledge, confidence, and skill when performing EFONA. Utilizing a spaced learning program may therefore improve provider skills, resulting in optimized patient care during a CICO event, leading to improved patient safety and outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children undergoing airway management during general anesthesia may experience airway complications resulting in a rare but life-threatening situation known as "Can't Intubate, Can't Oxygenate". This situation requires immediate recognition, advanced airway management, and ultimately emergency front-of-neck access. The absence of standardized procedures, lack of readily available equipment, inadequate knowledge, and training often lead to failed emergency front-of-neck access, resulting in catastrophic outcomes. In this narrative review, we examined the latest evidence on emergency front-of-neck access in children. METHODS: A comprehensive literature was performed the use of emergency front-of-neck access (eFONA) in infants and children. RESULTS: Eighty-six papers were deemed relevant by abstract. Finally, eight studies regarding the eFONA technique and simulations in animal models were included. For all articles, their primary and secondary outcomes, their specific animal model, the experimental design, the target participants, and the equipment were reported. CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, we propose a general approach to the eFONA technique and a guide for implementing local protocols and training. Additionally, we introduce the application of innovative tools such as 3D models, ultrasound, and artificial intelligence, which can improve the precision, safety, and training of this rare but critical procedure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Dealing with a difficult airway is familiar to emergency care providers in both the prehospital and clinical settings. In anesthesiology and emergency medical care different algorithms almost equal in their wording have been introduced, indicating that an emergency front of neck airway access (eFONA) has to be established in the case of a cannot ventilate-cannot oxygenate situation. In a survey (Surveymonkey®) data concerning the level of experience with eFONA, devices required, previous training and complications were allocated among acute and emergency care providers of different backgrounds (doctors and paramedics). Furthermore, we asked about individual attitudes to and frequency of previous situations, in which an eFONA was not established despite strong indications. Of the respondents 15% (n = 63) answered that they had experienced this type of situation. eFONA had been performed by 28% of the interviewed (n = 117), reflecting the high number of military and EMT (emergency medical team) physicians participating in the survey. The number of experiences are rarely representative for the civilian setting. Different adjuncts may be helpful to detect the cricothyroid ligament. To use ultrasound seems obvious but it doubles the time for the detection of the cricothyroid ligament. Laryngeal masks can be employed as a supraglottic airway device (SAD) during "plan B". Stabilizing the airway with a SAD almost doubles the success of identifying laryngeal landmarks in females. The crew resource management (CRM) guidelines are more than essential in threatening situations demanding measures like eFONA. Providers should anticipate emerging problems and whenever feasible call for help and finally speak up. Naming a failed airway should be avoided as it implies a failure of the provider or of the entire airway team. In fact, the term non-accessible airway should be introduced. This might help to avoid the implication of a major failure. So far, an ideal simulator to train eFONA has not been introduced but it is mandatory to train procedures and algorithms on different types of simulators and manikins to achieve mastery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: In a cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate scenario (CICO), emergency front of neck access (eFONA) is the final lifesaving step in airway management to reverse hypoxia and prevent progression to brain injury, cardiac arrest and death. The Difficult Airway Society (DAS) guidelines advise the scalpel cricothyroidotomy method for eFONA. Anatomical and physiological changes in pregnancy exacerbate the already challenging obstetric airway. We aim to assess the impact made by introducing formal eFONA training to the perioperative medicine department of an obstetric hospital. Methods: Ethical approval and written informed consent were obtained. 17 anesthetists participated, (two consultants, one senior registrar, four registrars and eight senior house officers). Study design was as follows: Initial participant survey and performance of a timed scalpel cricothyroidotomy on Limbs & Things AirSim Advance X cricothyroidotomy training mannikin. Difficulty of the attempt was rated on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants then watched the DAS eFONA training video. They then re-performed a scalpel cricothyroidotomy and completed a repeat survey. The primary endpoint was duration of cricothyroidotomy attempt, measured as time from CICO declaration to lung inflation confirmed visually. After a three-month period, participants were reassessed. Results: Four anesthetists had previous eFONA training with simulation, only one underwent training in the previous year. The mean time-to-lung inflation pre-intervention was 123.6 seconds and post-intervention was 80.8 seconds. This was statistically significant (p = 0.0192). All participants found training beneficial. Mean improvement of VAS was 3. All participants' confidence levels in identifying when to perform eFONA and ability to correctly identify anatomy improved. On repeat assessment, 11/13 participants successfully performed a surgical cricothyroidotomy, mean improvement from first attempt was 12 seconds (p = 0.68) which was not statistically significant. Conclusion: This method of training is an easily reproducible way to teach a rarely performed skill in the obstetric population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Aim: Emergency front of neck access (eFONA), such as scalpel cricothyroidotomy, is a rescue technique used to open the airway during "cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate" situations. However, little is known about the adverse events associated with the procedure. This study aimed to describe the adverse events that occur in patients who undergo eFONA and their management. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included emergency patients who underwent eFONA between April 2012 and August 2020. We described the patients' characteristics and the adverse events during or immediately after the procedure. Results: Among 75,529 emergency patients during the study period, 31 (0.04%) underwent an eFONA. The median (interquartile range) age was 53 (39-67) years, and 23 patients (74.2%) were men. Of all cases, 13 (41.9%) experienced adverse events. Of these, three cases (23.2%) were cephalad misplacement of the intubation tube, one case (7.7%) was cuff injury, one case (7.7%) was tube obstruction due to vomiting, and one case (7.7%) was tube kink. In cases with these adverse events, the initial attempt of eFONA failed, and alternative immediate action was necessary to secure the airway. Conclusion: This single-center retrospective observational study described several adverse events of eFONA. In particular, it is important to understand the possible life-threatening adverse events that lead to failure of securing airways such as cephalad displacement, tube obstruction, and tube kink and respond promptly to ensure a secure definitive airway for patients' safety.

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound implications for continuing medical education. Travel restrictions, lockdowns and social distancing in an effort to curb spread have meant that medical conferences have been postponed or cancelled. When the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists made the decision to commit to a fully virtual 2021 Annual Scientific Meeting, the organising committee investigated the viability of presenting a virtual 'Can't intubate, can't oxygenate' workshop. A workshop was designed comprising a lecture, case scenario discussion and demonstration of emergency front-of-neck access techniques broadcast from a central hub before participants separated into Zoom® (Zoom Video Communications, San Jose, CA, USA) breakout rooms for hands-on practice, guided by facilitators working virtually from their own home studios. Kits containing equipment including a 3D printed larynx, cannula, scalpel and bougie were sent to workshop participants in the weeks before the meeting. Participants were asked to complete pre- and post-workshop surveys. Of 42 participants, 32 responded, with the majority rating the workshop 'better than expected'. All except two respondents felt the workshop met learning objectives. Themes of positive feedback included being impressed with the airway model, the small group size, content and delivery. Feedback focused on previously unperceived advantages of virtual technical skills workshops, including convenience, equitable access and the reusable airway model. Disadvantages noted by respondents included lack of social interaction, inability to trial more expensive airway equipment, and some limitations of the ability of facilitators to review participants' technique. Despite limitations, in our experience, virtual workshops can be planned with innovative solutions to deliver technical skills education successfully.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objectives: In novice final year veterinary students, we sought to: (1) compare the procedure time between a novel cricothyrotomy (CTT) technique and an abbreviated tracheostomy (TT) technique in canine cadavers, (2) assess the success rate of each procedure, (3) assess the complication rate of each procedure via a damage score, (4) evaluate the technical difficulty of each procedure and (5) determine the preferred procedure of study participants for emergency front-of-neck access. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-over, block randomised trial was performed, where veterinary students completed CTT and TT procedures on cadaver dogs. Eight students were recruited and performed 32 procedures on 16 dogs. A generalised estimating equation approach to modelling the procedure times was used. Results: The procedure time was significantly faster for the CTT than the TT technique, on average (p < 0.001). The mean time taken to complete the CTT technique was 49.6 s (95% CI: 29.5-69.6) faster on average, with a mean CTT time of less than half that of the TT. When taking into account the attempt number, the procedure time for a CTT was 66.4 s (95% CI: 38.9-93.9) faster than TT for the first attempt, and for the second attempt, this was 32.7 s (95% CI: 15.2-50.2) faster, on average. The success rate for both procedures was 100% and there was no difference detected in the damage or difficulty scores (P = 0.13 and 0.08, respectively). Seven of eight participants preferred the CTT. Clinical Significance: CTT warrants consideration as the primary option for emergency front-of-neck airway access for dogs.

RESUMEN

Emergency front-of-neck access to achieve a percutaneous airway can be a life-saving intervention, but there is debate about the preferred technique. This prospective, observational study was designed to compare the two most common emergency surgical airway techniques in a wet lab simulation using an ovine model. Forty-three doctors participated. After providing standardised reading, a lecture and dry lab benchtop training, participants progressed to a high-fidelity wet lab simulation. Participants entered an operating theatre where a 'cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate' situation had been declared and were directed to perform emergency front-of-neck access: first with a cannula technique (14-gauge cannula insertion with ventilation using a Rapid-O2® cricothyroidotomy insufflation device); and subsequently, a scalpel-bougie technique (surgical incision, bougie insertion into trachea and then tracheal tube passed over bougie, with ventilation using a self-inflating bag). The primary end-point was time from declaration of 'cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate' to delivery of oxygen via a correctly placed percutaneous device. If a cannula or tracheal tube was not placed within 240 s, the attempt was marked as a failure. There was one failure for the cannula approach and 15 for the scalpel-bougie technique (OR 0.07 (95%CI 0.00-0.43); p <0.001). Median (IQR [range]) time to oxygenation, if successful, was 65 (57-78 [28-160]) s for the cannula approach and 90 (74-115 [40-265]) s for the scalpel-bougie technique (p=0.005). In this ovine model, emergency front-of-neck access using a cannula had a lower chance of failure and (when successful) shorter time to first oxygen delivery compared with a scalpel-bougie technique.

Asunto(s)