RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The heterogeneous biology of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), as well as the variable outcomes, in the setting of numerous treatment options have led to prognostic uncertainty. Consequently, making treatment decisions is challenging and necessitates involved communication between patient and provider about the risks and benefits. We developed and investigated an interactive decision support tool (DST) designed to improve communication of treatment options and related long-term risks for individuals diagnosed with DCIS. FINDINGS: The DST was developed for use by individuals aged > 40 years with DCIS and is based on a disease simulation model that integrates empirical data and clinical characteristics to predict patient-specific impacts of six DCIS treatment choices. Personalized risk predictions for each treatment option were communicated using icon arrays and percentages for each outcome. Users of the DST were asked before and after interacting with the DST about: (1) awareness of DCIS treatment options, (2) willingness to consider these options, (3) knowledge of risks associated with DCIS, and (4) helpfulness of the DST. Data were collected from January 2019 to April 2022. Users' median estimated risk of dying from DCIS in 10 years decreased from 9% pre-tool to 3% post-tool (p < 0.0001). 76% (n = 101/132) found the tool helpful. CONCLUSIONS: Information about DCIS treatment options and related risk predictions was effectively communicated, and a large majority participants found the DST to be helpful. Successfully informing patients about their treatment options and how their individual risks affect those options is a critical step in the decision-making process. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier NCT02926911.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Humanos , Femenino , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/terapia , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Internet , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Toma de DecisionesRESUMEN
The approach to manage breast cancer has undergone a significant transformation, leading to longer survival rates. However, there is still a rise in metastasis occurring in less common locations such as the orbit. We report the case of a 40-year-old female diagnosed with luminal A, left-side breast cancer, back in September 2020. She presented with de novo metastatic diseases to the liver, bone, lung, and orbit. She received palliative radiation therapy (RT) to the orbit at the dose of 25 Gray (Gy) in five fractions, and follow-up brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated a positive response to treatment with a slight reduction in the size of the left infraorbital lesion. Systemic treatment was started with hormonal therapy fulvestrant and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), leuprolide, accompanied by palbociclib. As the incidence of ocular metastasis from breast cancer increases, oncologists need to be vigilant about symptoms and use appropriate diagnostic techniques.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To investigate the prognostic differences following the achievement of a pathological complete response (pCR) through neoadjuvant chemotherapy across different molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma. METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) were identified for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy who achieved pathological complete response for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast between 2010 and 2019.Comparing the clinicopathological characteristics of patients across different molecular subtypes. Univariate and Cox multivariate analyses were utilized to identify independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The Kaplan-Meier method is used to compare OS and CSS among different molecular subtypes. After propensity score matching, subgroup analysis results were presented through forest plots. RESULTS: This study included 9,380 patients diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma, who were categorized into four molecular subtypes: 2,721 (29.01%) HR + /HER-2 + , 1,661 (17.71%) HR + /HER2-, 2,082 (22.20%) HR-/HER2 + , and 2,916 (31.08%) HR-/HER-2-. HR + /HER-2- subgroup exhibited a significantly higher proportion of patients under 50 years old than the other subtype groups (54.67% vs 40.2%, 50.35% and 51.82%, p < 0.01), and had a higher N2 + N3 stage (11.2% vs 7.24%, 8.69% and 7.48%, p < 0.01). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that molecular subtype was the independent risk factor for OS and CSS in patients(p < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the HR + /HER-2 + subtype had the highest OS and CSS(p < 0.05). Next, were the HR-/HER-2 + and HR-/HER-2- subtypes, with the HR + /HER-2- group having the lowest OS and CSS(p < 0.05). After propensity score matching, the OS and CSS of patients in the HR + /HER-2 + group remained higher compared to HR + /HER-2- group(p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of different molecular subtypes exhibit varying prognoses after achieving pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Those in the HR + /HER-2- group are younger, have a higher lymph node stage, and the lowest OS and CSS, whereas patients in the HR + /HER-2 + group have the highest OS and CSS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Receptor ErbB-2 , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/mortalidad , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Pronóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Estudios de Seguimiento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Programa de VERF , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Radiologists play a key role in establishing an early and accurate diagnosis, especially for rare diseases. Mahvash disease (OMIM 619290) is an autosomal recessive hereditary disease caused by inactivating mutations of the glucagon receptor and its main clinical consequences are pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and in some cases, porto-sinusoidal vascular disease and portal hypertension. Untreated Mahvash disease can be lethal. The diagnosis of Mahvash disease has almost always been delayed in the past due to radiologists' unawareness of or unfamiliarity with the unique imaging features of Mahvash disease which are moderately to enormously enlarge pancreas with preserved pancreas contour and parenchyma without vascular involvement or lymphadenopathy. These features help differentiate Mahvash disease from other etiologies of diffusely enlarged pancreas such as diffuse pancreatic ductal carcinoma, diffuse pancreatic lymphoma, and autoimmune pancreatitis. Invoking Mahvash disease in the differential diagnosis of an enlarged pancreas has recently been shown to facilitate early diagnosis. To prevent missing the diagnosis of this significant disease, I sincerely ask radiologists to consider Mahvash disease in their differential diagnoses of diffusely enlarged pancreas.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: Ductal carcinoma in situ is considered a local disease with no metastatic potential, thus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may be deemed an overtreatment. SLNB should be reserved for patients with invasive cancer, even though the risk of upstaging rises to 25 %. We aimed to identify clinicopathological predictors of post-operative upstaging in invasive carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of DCIS subjected to breast surgery between January 2017 to December 2021, and evaluated at the Breast Unit of PTV (Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome). RESULTS: Out of 267 patients diagnosed with DCIS, 33(12.4 %) received a diagnosis upstaging and 9(3.37 %) patients presented with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis. In multivariate analysis, grade 3 tumor (OR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-5.6), dense nodule at mammography (OR 1.3; 95 % CI 1.1-2.6) and presence of a solid nodule at ultrasonography (OR 1.5; 95 % CI 1.2-2.6) were independent upstaging predictors. Differently, the independent predictors for SLNB metastasis were: upstaging (OR 2.1.; 95 % CI 1.2-4.6; p = 0.0079) and age between 40 and 60yrs (OR 1.4; 95 % CI 1.4-2.7; p = 0.027). All 9 patients with SLN metastasis received a diagnosis upstaging and were aged between 40 and 60 years old. CONCLUSION: We identified pre-operative independent predictors of upstaging to invasive ductal carcinoma. The combined use of different predictors in an algorithm for surgical treatments of DCIS could reduce the numbers of unnecessary SLNB.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante , Metástasis Linfática , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/cirugía , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/secundario , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/secundario , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/métodos , Pronóstico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mamografía , Mastectomía , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor to invasive breast cancer (IBC). Studies have indicated differences in DCIS outcome based on race or ethnicity, but molecular differences have not been investigated. METHODS: We examined the molecular profile of DCIS by self-reported race (SRR) and outcome groups in Black (n = 99) and White (n = 191) women in a large DCIS case-control cohort study with longitudinal follow up. RESULTS: Gene expression and pathway analyses suggested that different genes and pathways are involved in diagnosis and ipsilateral breast outcome (DCIS or IBC) after DCIS treatment in White versus Black women. We identified differences in ER and HER2 expression, tumor microenvironment composition, and copy number variations by SRR and outcome groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that different molecular mechanisms drive initiation and subsequent ipsilateral breast events in Black versus White women.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Negro o Afroamericano/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/genética , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/etnología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Pronóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Autoinforme , Microambiente Tumoral/genética , Blanco/genéticaRESUMEN
Introduction and importance: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide, predominantly manifesting as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), which usually metastasizes to the bones, lungs, and liver. However, metastasis to the bladder is exceedingly rare, with few documented cases and limited understanding in the existing literature. Case presentation: A 57-year-old woman with a history of IDC presented with a lump in her left breast and was initially treated with chemotherapy and a modified radical mastectomy. Years later, she developed urinary symptoms, which upon investigation revealed multiple bladder tumors and right kidney hydronephrosis. Diagnostic imaging, including ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scans, supported these findings. Clinical discussion: The discovery of bladder metastasis from IDC highlights significant diagnostic challenges due to the atypical presentation. The case underscores the importance of considering unusual metastatic sites in patients with known breast cancer, especially when they present with non-specific urinary symptoms. This report explores the potential pathophysiological mechanisms of such rare metastatic occurrences and discusses the implications for clinical practice. Conclusion: This case exemplifies the critical need for heightened awareness and thorough evaluation in patients with unusual symptoms and a history of breast cancer. It calls for more comprehensive diagnostic approaches and possibly adjusted treatment protocols to better manage atypical metastases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes and contribute to a deeper understanding of metastatic breast cancer behavior.
RESUMEN
The standard treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ became well established through the results of several valuable clinical trials, and its therapeutic benefits have now come to be taken for granted. Ductal carcinoma in situ has an extremely good prognosis with the current treatment approach, with a 10-year breast cancer-specific survival rate of 97-98%. According to one retrospective cohort study, the breast cancer-specific survival rate of patients with low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ does not differ significantly between patients undergoing and not undergoing surgery. Some patients with ductal carcinoma in situ are not at a risk of progression to invasive cancer, but the predictors of such progression have not yet been clearly identified. Therefore, the same therapeutic strategies have been used to treat ductal carcinoma in situ and under the assumption that they have risks of invasive breast cancer, and a well-balanced risk/benefit ratio in respect of treatment has not yet been achieved. Based on the results of several recent clinical trials aimed at ensuring provision of a well-balanced treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ which carries a good prognosis, de-escalation of postoperative adjuvant therapy has now begun. Currently, not only is the optimization of postoperative adjuvant therapy accelerating, but also clinical trials to de-escalate basic surgical treatments are under way. There is a possibility of achieving individualized treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with reduced treatment intervention. In this review, we present an overview of the current treatment approaches and potential future management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
RESUMEN
Breast cancer typically arises from the terminal duct-lobular unit of the mammary gland and rarely from the ducts inside the nipple. The present paper reports a rare case of primary invasive ductal carcinoma of the papilla, which was a locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer that was treated with 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a nab-paclitaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide regimen. Surgical pathology confirmed that a pathological complete response was achieved and adjuvant radiotherapy was performed postoperatively. No recurrence or metastasis occurred as of April 2024. A review of previous similar cases revealed that primary invasive breast cancer of the nipple has several manifestations. Changes in the nipple should be treated cautiously and a pathological biopsy should be performed in a timely manner. Breast cancer occurring in the nipple can be treated with reference to the same type of common breast cancer, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy can also be performed first if neoadjuvant chemotherapy is indicated.
RESUMEN
Male breast cancer is an uncommon diagnosis with limited research on management and prognosis due to its rarity. We discuss a case of a 55-year-old male with a non-contributory past medical history who presented with an enlarging palpable mass of his right breast tissue at the 10:00 position. The ultrasound of the right breast showed a 2.8 cm heterogenous mass with irregular borders highly suspicious for malignancy. The follow-up sonogram-guided core biopsy was performed, and the pathology of the mass confirmed high-grade infiltrating ductal carcinoma. A modified radical mastectomy of the right breast with extensive axillary lymph node excision was performed. Genetic testing of the excised tumor revealed a MUTYH gene mutation and a BARD1 (BRCA1-associated RING domain 1) gene mutation of unknown significance. Histopathological analysis confirmed a Grade 2, ER/PR-positive, KI 67-positive, and HER2-negative tumor.
RESUMEN
Male breast cancer is a rare disease, and it is important to have a high index of suspicion in patients presenting with breast symptoms, such as a breast mass or nipple discharge. Most male patients who are diagnosed with breast cancer present with breast complaints and/or a strong family history of cancer. Here, we will present a 47-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with bilateral ductal carcinoma in situ during a routine gynecomastia surgery after massive weight loss. This case demonstrates the importance of sending breast tissue specimens for pathology, especially in a male patient.
RESUMEN
Mammary Paget's disease (MPD) or Paget's disease of the breast is a rare dermatological malignancy of the nipple-areolar complex that manifests with a spectrum of symptoms spanning from itching and redness to more severe indications such as breast lump, nipple-areolar complex destruction, or nipple discharge. It is predominantly associated with an underlying ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive ductal carcinoma. MPD often masquerades as other benign and malignant dermatological conditions, including eczema, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and squamous and basal cell carcinomas, leading to delayed diagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Only one-third of the patients present with a palpable lump; therefore, advanced age with chronic and unilateral lesions should raise concern for MPD. Our review article presents case reports of MPD imitating other skin conditions and underscores the key findings of clinical features and diagnostic workup to help differentiate the condition. A literature review revealed that studies emphasize caution regarding the sole use of mammography and ultrasound in diagnosing MPD, particularly in cases lacking a palpable lump. This highlights the MRI as a superior and more accurate imaging tool. However, any suspicious lesion must be biopsied to allow histopathological and immunohistochemical examination, since there are some cases where MRI findings were negative in the presence of a biopsy-proven MPD. This highlights the need for clinicians to investigate any suspicious lesion of the nipple or breast using the complete triple assessment approach to exclude an underlying malignancy. It is imperative to establish therapeutic guidelines to approach any nipple lesion to minimize the risk of misdiagnosing any underlying cancer, which can be potentially fatal if left alone.
RESUMEN
Ectopic breast tissue (EBT) is breast tissue located outside the normal anatomic boundaries of the breasts, developing due to incomplete embryological regression of the mammary ridges. EBT can develop anywhere along the milk line, with the axilla being the most common site. While generally benign, EBT can undergo malignant transformation. This case report discusses a 24-year-old female with locally advanced invasive ductal carcinoma in the axillary EBT, highlighting its clinical presentation, diagnostic process, and management in a resource-limited setting. The patient underwent wide local excision and axillary lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, achieving a favorable short-term outcome. This case underscores the importance of considering EBT in differential diagnosis of axillary masses and the need for tailored treatment strategies in such settings.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer affecting women in the United States. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the earliest identifiable pre-invasive BC lesion. Estimates show that 14 to 50% of DCIS cases progress to invasive BC. Methods: Our objective was to identify nuclear matrix proteins (NMP) with specifically altered expression in DCIS and later stages of BC compared to non-diseased breast reduction mammoplasty and a contralateral breast explant culture using mass spectrometry and RNA sequencing to accurately identify aggressive DCIS. Results: Sixty NMPs were significantly differentially expressed between the DCIS and non-diseased breast epithelium in an isogenic contralateral pair of patient-derived extended explants. Ten of the sixty showed significant mRNA expression level differences that matched the protein expression. These 10 proteins were similarly expressed in non-diseased breast reduction cells. Three NMPs (RPL7A, RPL11, RPL31) were significantly upregulated in DCIS and all other BC stages compared to the matching contralateral breast culture and an unrelated non-diseased breast reduction culture. RNA sequencing analyses showed that these three genes were increasingly upregulated with BC progression. Finally, we identified three NMPs (AHNAK, CDC37 and DNAJB1) that were significantly downregulated in DCIS and all other BC stages compared to the isogenically matched contralateral culture and the non-diseased breast reduction culture using both proteomics and RNA sequencing techniques. Discussion: These genes should form the basis of, or contribute to, a molecular diagnostic panel that could identify DCIS lesions likely to be indolent and therefore not requiring aggressive treatment.
RESUMEN
Introduction: It is uncommon for breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma to present simultaneously. An increase in the rate of simultaneous malignancy identification has resulted from adopting more sensitive staging imaging techniques. Case Description: Here, we describe a patient who was diagnosed with axillary diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in a cancer hospital during a staging work-up for suspected breast cancer. Breast cancer was staged as Stage IIA and DLBCL as Stage IE. She was given three cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) protocol. Interim positron emission tomography scan showed a complete metabolic response (Deauville score 2). She was given one more cycle of R-CHOP. Then, she had right breast-conserving surgery with axillary lymph node dissection in August 2023. Histopathology report showed residual disease with ductal carcinoma in situ. She was recommended weekly paclitaxel for 12 cycles and trastuzumab and pertuzumab for 1 year. She is currently having her adjuvant systemic therapy, after which she will be planned for local radiation. Endocrine treatment will be started once chemotherapy is completed. Practical Implications: Complete baseline work-up per standard protocols/guidelines should be done in each malignancy. Biopsy of metastatic sites should be done wherever possible. All histopathologies should be reviewed thoroughly before treatment initiation, as they may significantly alter patient management.
RESUMEN
In many countries, hormone receptor status assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely performed, as hormone receptor-positive DCIS patients are eligible for adjuvant anti-hormonal treatment, aiming to reduce the ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risk. Although HER2 gene amplification and its associated HER2 protein overexpression constitute a major prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast carcinoma, its use in the diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is less straightforward. HER2 immunohistochemistry is not routinely performed yet, as the role of HER2-positivity in DCIS biology is unclear. Nonetheless, recent data challenge this practice. Here, we discuss the value of routine HER2 assessment for DCIS. HER2-positivity correlates strongly with DCIS grade: around four in five HER2-positive DCIS show high grade atypia. As morphological DCIS grading is prone to interobserver variability, HER2 immunohistochemistry could render grading more robust. Several studies showed an association between HER2-positive DCIS and ipsilateral recurrence risk, albeit currently unclear whether this is for overall, in situ or invasive recurrence. HER2-positive DCIS tends to be larger, with a higher risk of involved surgical margins. HER2-positive DCIS patients benefit more from adjuvant radiotherapy: it substantially decreases the local recurrence risk after lumpectomy, without impact on overall survival. HER2-positivity in pure biopsy-diagnosed DCIS is associated with increased upstaging to invasive carcinoma after surgery. HER2 immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsies might therefore provide useful information to surgeons, favoring wider excisions. The time seems right to consider DCIS subtype-dependent treatment, comprising appropriate local treatment for HER2-positive DCIS patients and de-escalation for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative DCIS patients.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante , Receptor ErbB-2 , Humanos , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/terapia , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/metabolismo , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Pronóstico , Inmunohistoquímica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/metabolismo , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Clasificación del Tumor , Relevancia ClínicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines do not recommend routine sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), except in the setting of mastectomy or microinvasive disease. This study aimed to evaluate national SLNB utilization in women undergoing upfront mastectomy for DCIS, identify predictors of SLNB utilization, and determine the percentage with a positive SLNB. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the NCDB of women with clinical DCIS who underwent upfront mastectomy between 2012 and 2017. Demographic and clinicopathologic variables were compared between patients who underwent SLNB and those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with SLNB utilization and positive SLNB. RESULTS: About 38,973 patients met inclusion criteria: 34,231 (88%) underwent SLNB and 4742 (12%) had no surgical axillary staging. Most patients were age 50-69 (51%), non-Hispanic White (71%), with private insurance (66%). On multivariate analysis, older patients were less likely to receive SLNB (P < .01), while patients with higher grade DCIS were more likely to undergo SLNB (P < .01). In those who underwent SLNB (n = 34,231), only 1,149 (3.4%) had nodal involvement. Non-Hispanic Black patients had increased odds of a positive SLNB (P < .01), while those with estrogen receptor positive disease were less likely to be node positive (OR 0.68, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: While 88% of patients had a SLNB, only 3.4% were found to be node positive. Given this low rate, it is reasonable to consider SLNB omission in select patients with low grade, hormone receptor positive DCIS undergoing upfront mastectomy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante , Mastectomía , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Humanos , Femenino , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/cirugía , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mastectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Adulto , Metástasis Linfática/patología , AxilaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the association between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) samples and disease recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women aged 18 years and older who underwent treatment between January 2007 and December 2020. Male patients, individuals diagnosed with invasive or microinvasive disease based on anatomopathological examination of surgical specimens, and those with a personal history of any other cancers were excluded. Additionally, the presence of "touching TILs" (lymphocytes in direct contact with tumor cells) and periductal desmoplasia were evaluated as complementary methods to represent the immunological microenvironment. The primary outcome was relapse-free survival based on TIL quantification adjusted for potential confounders. Pathologists assessed TILs in the sample with the highest tumor representation and quantified them as a percentage. Survival was evaluated using KaplanâMeier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients met the eligibility criteria. The mean follow-up duration was 77.2 months, with a recurrence rate of 9.2%. Patients with TILs ≥ 17% had a greater risk of recurrence (HR 2.97, 95% CI 1.17-7.51; p = 0.02). Additionally, focal necrosis (HR 6.4, 95% CI 1.39-34.71; p = 0.018) or comedonecrosis (HR 4.53, 95% CI 1.34-15.28; p = 0.015) were associated with increased recurrence risk. According to the multivariate model, comedonecrosis and TILs ≥ 17% were significantly associated with recurrence (p = 0.034 and p = 0.035, respectively). Regarding the evaluations of "touching TILs" and periductal desmoplasia, no statistical significance was found when assessing their association with disease recurrence. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, a high percentage of TILs (≥ 17%) and the presence of comedonecrosis were independently associated with DCIS recurrence.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The current standard of treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. With a growing debate about overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk DCIS, active surveillance is being explored in several ongoing trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the recurrence of low-risk DCIS under various treatment approaches. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched for studies reporting ipsilateral breast tumour event (IBTE), contralateral breast cancer (CBC), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates at 5 and 10 years in low-risk DCIS. The primary outcome was invasive IBTE (iIBTE) defined as invasive progression in the ipsilateral breast. RESULTS: Thirty three eligible studies were identified, involving 47,696 women with low-risk DCIS. The pooled 5-year and 10-year iIBTE rates were 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3, 8.1) and 5.9% (95% CI: 3.8, 9.0), respectively. The iIBTE rates were significantly lower in patients who underwent surgery compared to those who did not, at 5 years (3.5% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.003) and 10 years (6.4% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.008). Similarly, the 10-year BCSS rate was higher in the surgery group (96.0% vs. 99.6%, P = 0.010). In patients treated with breast-conserving surgery, additional radiotherapy significantly reduced IBTE risk, but not total-CBC risk. CONCLUSION: This review showed a lower risk of progression and better survival in women who received surgery and additional RT for low-risk DCIS. However, our findings were primarily based on observational studies, and should be confirmed with the results from the ongoing trials.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) on top of breast conventional imaging for predicting the upgrading of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive cancer after surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 140 biopsy-proven DCIS lesions in 138 patients and divided them into two groups based on postoperative histopathology: non-upgrade and upgrade groups. Conventional ultrasound (US), mammography (MMG), CEUS and clinicopathological (CL) features were reviewed and compared between the two groups. The predictive performance of different models (with and without CEUS features) for histologic upgrade were compared to calculate the added value of CEUS. RESULTS: Fifty-nine (42.1 %) lesions were histologically upgraded to invasive cancer after surgery. By logistic regression analyses, we found that high-grade DCIS at biopsy (P=0.004), ultrasonographic lesion size > 20 mm (P=0.007), mass-like lesion on US (P=0.030), the presence of suspicious calcification on MMG (P=0.014), the presence of perfusion defect (P=0.005) and the area under TIC>1021.34 ml (P<0.001) on CEUS were six independent factors predicting concomitant invasive components after surgery. The CL+US+MMG model made with the four predictors in the clinicopathologic, US and MMG categories yielded an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) value of 0.759 (95 % CI: 0.680-0.828) in predicting histological upgrade. The combination model built by adding the two CEUS predictors to the CL+US+MMG model showed higher predictive efficacy than the CL+US+MMG model (P=0.018), as the AUROC value was improved to 0.861 (95 % CI: 0.793-0.914). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to breast conventional imaging could improve the preoperative prediction of an upgrade to invasive cancer from CNB -proven DCIS lesions.