RESUMEN

The dry impinger method is commonly used for the determination of condensable particulate matter (CPM) emissions. The coil and chamber condenser is used to build different dry impinger methods for CPM sampling. The comparative analysis of coil and chamber condenser is performed in a laboratory experiment to evaluate the deviation caused by SO2. Results showed that the positive deviation caused by SO2 in the chamber condenser is lower than that in the coil condenser under the same sampling conditions, especially under high humidity flue gas. The CPM emission characteristics from Hanchuan coal-fired power plant (CFPP) determined by both dry impinger methods are also investigated as well. The CPM and its most water-soluble ions (e.g., F-, Cl-, NO3-, SO42-, Na+, Ca2+ and NH4+) measured by method #2 (chamber condenser) are higher than that of method #1 (coil condenser). In addition, the esters in the CPM also increased with the CPM concentrations. Based on above evidences, it can be inferred that the dry impinger method with chamber condenser, will be recommended as the appropriate method for measuring CPM emitted from stationary sources, especially under the high humidity flue gas conditions.

Asunto(s)

Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Material Particulado , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Carbón Mineral/análisis , Iones/análisis , Material Particulado/análisis , Centrales Eléctricas

RESUMEN

With the retrofitting of coal-fired power plants and steel plants for ultra-low-emission control, the concentration of filterable particles (FPM) from these sources is decreasing gradually. The condensable particle matter (CPM) draws more attention. The understanding of CPM emission concentration and chemical characteristics is still limited. There has been no standard determination method of CPM in China until now. In this study, three methods, including the dry impinger method (US EPA method 202), indirect dilution method, and direct dilution method, are discussed and compared in measuring CPM emissions from coal-fired power plants, coke-making plants and sintering plants. The results show that method 202 overestimates the emissions of CPM, due to the fact that the gaseous HCl or SO2 dissolves into condensable liquid and cannot be completely eliminated by N2 purging after sampling. Instead, CPM measured using the indirect dilution method better represents its real emission levels into the atmosphere.