RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of botulinum toxin in the salivary glands of patients with neurological impairment and drooling and its impact on the quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD 42,023,435,242) and conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial databases until August 2023, no language restriction. Cohort studies and randomized clinical trials of patients diagnosed with drooling and neurological impairment who used botulinum toxin on the salivary gland were included, which evaluated subjective quality of life parameters. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and Risk of Bias 2 tools. The certainty of the evidence was analyzed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Eight studies involving 317 patients were included. All studies, through subjective parameters, suggested the effectiveness of botulinum toxin in reducing drooling, resulting in an improvement in the quality of life. Three studies demonstrated improvements in swallowing and four in cases of respiratory diseases. Two clinical trials had a high risk of bias, whereas one had low risk. The five cohort studies that were evaluated had a high risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was considered low. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the patient/caregivers' perception of improvement in drooling, dysphagia, and respiratory symptoms, it can be inferred that botulinum toxin application reduces subjective drooling in neurologically compromised patients. Its impact contributes to the general well-being and quality of life. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Injection of botulinum toxin into the salivary glands can be considered an alternative technique to surgical or medicinal approaches in reducing drooling. It is effective, less invasive and without significant side effects. It promotes a positive impact on the well-being and quality of life of neurological patients.
Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida , Sialorrea , Humanos , Toxinas Botulínicas/uso terapéutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/complicaciones , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Sialorrea/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The present systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) aimed to establish whether there are evidence-based differences in the pharmacological agents used to manage sialorrhea in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors searched the databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for clinical trials. Unpublished trials were searched on clinicaltrials.gov and the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry. Means and standard deviations of changes in the salivary flow or drooling reported by participants due to the interventions were recorded. RESULTS: The authors analyzed 13 RCTs. Compared to the placebo, types A and B of the botulinum toxin effectively reduced the salivary flow and the severity or frequency of drooling. However, the network meta-analysis did not differentiate between the botulinum toxin types. Ipratropium bromide and glycopyrrolate did not differ from the placebo. Indirect evidence showed that ipratropium had similar results to those obtained with both types of botulinum toxin. The CINeMA approach estimated the quality of the evidence as very low for all comparisons. CONCLUSION: The best treatment for sialorrhea in patients with PD is not fully elucidated yet. Therefore, more well-conducted randomized clinical trials are required to increase the level of evidence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There needs to be more evidence defining the best intervention to treat sialorrhea in patients with PD. However, botulinum toxin types A and B seem to reduce sialorrhea in patients effectively.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Sialorrea , Humanos , Sialorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Sialorrea/etiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Metaanálisis en Red , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Glicopirrolato/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to determine the impact of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) on severity and frequency of drooling in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) secondary to Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS). METHODS: This is a prospective longitudinal observational study including 23 children who received bilateral injections of BTX in the parotid and submandibular glands. The Thomas-Stonell & Greenberg Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale was applied by a multidisciplinary team including Speech, Language and Hearing professionals. The Global Impression of Improvement (GII) Scale was also applied to assess parents' subjective perceptions of therapeutic response. Swallowing was assessed using Doppler ultrasonography. Univariate logistic regression was used to analyse differences between responders and non-responders. RESULTS: Participant age varied from 27 to 38 months (mean 31.78, SD = 2.61) all presented with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) V. Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale scores ranged from 7 to 9 points (median = 9) prior to BTX administration and from 4 to 6 (median = 6) after. Pre- and post-treatment reduction in drooling severity occurred (Z = -3.746; p < 0.001). No cases of drooling worsening were reported. Only two subjects presented adverse effects attributed to BTX administration. Correlation was only confirmed with GII. DISCUSSION: This article presents the safe and positive impact of BTX-A administration guided by anatomical references described in the literature, even on children with microcephaly. Further studies are needed to facilitate the use of Doppler ultrasonography as a tool to characterize changes in sensory processing and motor response following intraoral input in children with CP.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Parálisis Cerebral/complicaciones , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Sialorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección por el Virus Zika/complicaciones , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Drooling is a condition that affects patients with difficulties in swallowing, being common in patients with mental, neurological or dysphagic deficiency. This condition is difficult to diagnose, as it is often confused with sialorrhea, and in many cases we have a hyposalivation scenario. Its diagnosis is subjective, which is why scales should be used for the standardization of the evaluation of the degree of drooling before and after the proposed treatment, as the Thomas-Stonell and Greenberg scale. It causes problems such as perioral infections, rashes, wet clothing, leading to social embarrassment, and may be a risk factor for respiratory infections caused by asymptomatic aspiration of saliva. It presents several treatments, among them the pharmacological one, that is dependent of the clinical picture of each patient that must be evaluated daily. This article refers to a series of reports of cases of children in mechanical ventilation by tracheostomy, hospitalized, with clinical diagnosis of drooling, and clinical improvement with the use of scopolamine by gastrostomy, without intercurrences during its use. The objective of this study is to show other professionals the importance of drooling management, and to expose the adopted behavior in the described cases, providing reduction of respiratory infections and improvement of the clinical and social complications resulting from drooling.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapéutico , Escopolamina/uso terapéutico , Sialorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Gastrostomía , Humanos , Masculino , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Respiración Artificial , Escopolamina/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This study proposes a Speech Therapy treatment for individuals with sialorrhea (saliva production perceived by patient as excessive) as a consequence of Parkinson Disease (PD). Method: A prospective study in 18 individuals with PD diagnosis was taken and divided into two groups: A) received only Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) (swallowing process awareness), while B) received CBT plus Thermal Tactile Stimulation (TTS) (cold sensory stimulation to the pharyngeal anterior pillars and oral cavity). The intervention lasted 5 weeks. The purpose of this research was to prove the effectiveness of Speech Therapy in dealing with sialorrhea and to assess a significant difference between CBT and CBT plus TTS. A t-student parameter test and the Mann-Withney test were used. Resulted: The assessment by the Clinical Scale for Parkinson Sialorrhea (SCS-PD) prior to therapy was CBT group was 2.6 and 11.5 ± 9.4 ± 4.2 group difference was not statistically significant. After therapy was 3.5 ± 2.8 and 4.6 ± 3.5 both showed a statistically significant difference compared to baseline (p < 0.001), not having statistically significant difference between them. Conclusion: These tests showed that both treatments are effective to decrease sialorrhea perception in individuals with PD. Nevertheless, no statistical significant differences were noted between both treatments.
Introducción: Este estudio propone un tratamiento Fonoaudiológico para trabajar con personas que presentan sialorrea (producción de saliva que el paciente percibe como excesiva) producto de la Enfermedad de Parkinson (EP). Método: Dieciocho personas con diagnóstico de EP y sialorrea, las cuales se dividieron en dos grupos; A: recibió sólo Terapia Cognitivo Conductual (TCC) (concientización del proceso deglutorio), mientras el B: recibió TCC más Estimulación Termo Táctil (ETT) (se realiza estimulación sensorial con frío a los pilares faríngeos anteriores y cavidad oral), la intervención se realizó por 5 semanas. El objetivo de la presente investigación es evidenciar la efectividad de la terapia Fonoaudiológica en el abordaje de la sialorrea y evaluar si existe una diferencia significativa entre la TCC y la TCC más ETT. Se utilizó la prueba paramétrica t-student, y Test de Mann-Withney, se consideró significativo un p < 0,05. Resultados: La valoración mediante la Escala Clínica de la Sialorrea para Parkinson (SCS-PD) previo a la terapia en grupo con TCC 11,5 ± 2,6 y el grupo 9,4 ± 4,2 diferencia que no es estadísticamente significativa. Posterior a la terapia fue 3,5 ± 2,8 y 4,6 ± 3,5 ambos presentaron una diferencia estadísticamente significativa respecto a la basal (p < 0,001), no habiendo diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre ellas. Conclusión: Estas pruebas demostraron que ambos tratamientos son efectivos para disminuir la percepción de sialorrea en las personas con EP. Sin embargo, no se evidencian diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos tratamientos.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Sialorrea , Terapéutica , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Drooling is defined as non-intentional salivary loss from mouth. Its presence may lead to functional, psychological and social impairments, which affect patients and caregivers as well. Anterior drooling, where salivary flow escapes from mouth to outside, affects social relations, constituting a physical contact barrier and having a negative impact on quality of life, and it also interfere on speech and communication. Posterior drooling, where salivary flow goes towards the throat is associated to severe swallowing disorders, being an important aspiration risk. Although drooling etiology is multifactorial, its often seen associated to a neuromuscular dysfunction. The approach to drooling should be made by a multidisciplinary team. Therapeutic approach could be non-pharmacologic, pharmacologic, systemic or local. Ultrasound guidance Botulinum toxin injection is an efficient and safe alternative. A 4-year-old male with posterior fossa astrocytoma, VI-XI CN impairment, prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy, swallowing disorder and hypersalivation is presented. Drooling management with botulinum toxin A injection in both parotid and submandibular glands under ultrasound guidance was performed, with an important salivary flow decrease, which allowed him to open his mouth without saliva loss, having a positive impact on communication and socialization, improving his quality of life as well.
La sialorrea se define como la pérdida no intencional de saliva desde la boca. Su presencia puede conducir a alteraciones funcionales, psicológicas y sociales, que afectan tanto al paciente como a sus cuidadores. La sialorrea anterior, donde la saliva es derramada desde la boca al exterior afecta la socialización, constituyéndose como una barrera para el contacto físico e impacta en forma negativa sobre la calidad de vida, además interfiere en el lenguaje, el habla y la comunicación. La sialorrea posterior que es derramada hacia del itsmo de las fauces, se asocia a trastornos severos de la deglución, constituyendo un riesgo importante de aspiración. Aún cuando la etiología de la sialorrea es multifactorial, frecuentemente la vemos asociada a una disfunción neuromuscular. Su abordaje debe ser realizado por un equipo multidisciplinario. El enfoque terapéutico puede ser, no farmacológico o farmacológico, sistémico o local. Una de las alternativas es la infiltración con toxina botulínica guiada en forma ecográfica que ha demostrado ser eficiente y segura. Se presenta el caso de un preescolar de 4 años con antecedente de astrocitoma de fosa posterior, compromiso de VI al XI pares craneanos, ventilación mecánica prolongada a través de traqueostomía, trastorno de deglución e hipersalivación secundaria. Se realiza el manejo de la sialorrea con toxina botulínica A en parótidas y glándulas submandibulares con marcación ecográfica, resultando una disminución importante del flujo de saliva que le permite abrir la boca sin escurrimiento. Lo anterior impacta positivamente en la comunicación y socialización, además de mejorar su calidad de vida.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Preescolar , Niño , Sialorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Respiración Artificial , Salivación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sialorrea/cirugía , Sialorrea/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , TraqueostomíaRESUMEN
OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a segurança da ressecção bilateral das glândulas submandibulares e ligadura dos ductos parotídeos em crianças para reduzir a saliva, a eficácia e as complicações em médio e longo prazo no tratamento da sialorréia. FORMA DE ESTUDO: Coorte longitudinal. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Trinta e uma crianças, com idades entre 6 e 13 anos (média de 7,6 anos), com múltiplas deficiências de etiologia neurológica foram submetidas à ressecção bilateral das glândulas submandibulares e ligadura dos ductos parotídeos, para controle da sialorréia, entre dezembro de 1999 a dezembro de 2005, e seguimento médio de 36 meses. RESULTADOS: O critério de sucesso foi o estabelecido por Wilkie, e 87 por cento das crianças tiveram resultados excelentes e bons, sendo a morbidade insignificante e a principal complicação foi o edema temporário na região parotídea. CONCLUSÃO: A ressecção bilateral das glândulas submandibulares e a ligadura dos ductos parotídeos constituem técnica segura e eficaz para ser realizada em crianças, com 87 por cento de sucesso no controle da sialorréia.
AIM: To evaluate the safety of bilateral submandibular gland excision and parotid duct ligation in order to control drooling in children; to assess its long-term efficacy and complications. STUDY DESIGN: longitudinal cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one children aged 6 to 13 years (7.6 years old in average), with multiple neurological disabilities were submitted to a bilateral submandibular gland excision with parotid duct ligation in order to control ptyalism between December 1999 and December 2005, mean follow up of 36 months. RESULTS: According to WilkieÆs success criteria, 87 percent of children had excellent or good results and insignificant morbidity was insignificant; with temporary parotid edema as the major complication. CONCLUSION: Bilateral submandibular gland excision with parotid duct ligation were safe to be performed in children, with 87 percent of success in drooling control.