RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcome and quality of life in distal biceps tendon repair with single incision technique and anchor fixation method. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was made of patients with complete distal biceps tendon rupture. The chosen repair method was single incision technique with anchor fixation. The outcome was assessed with functional testing of the elbow with strength and ROM. Additionally Mayo elbow performance index, Oxford elbow score, Disability arm hand shoulder questionnaire and patient rated elbow evaluation scores were used to evaluate quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 28 patients, the average strength in flexion and supination was decreased with 91% and 89% of the strength compared to the non-injured arm. ROM was preserved in flexion, extension, supination and pronation. The mean scores for quality of life evaluation were MEPS = 96 ± 7.8, OES = 46.8 ± 1.9, DASH = 1.0 ± 1.9 and PREE = 2.0 ± 3.6. LABCN injury was the most common temporary complication with 30% followed by pain with 23%. Two patients were identified with HO and 1 patient was identified with median nerve injury. There were no cases of radioulnar synostosis and PIN injury. CONCLUSION: Overall strength in flexion and supination were slightly decreased with preserved ROM. Patients reported nearly perfect quality of life as demonstrated with the scores. The complications rate was high with mainly minor complications. Distal biceps tendon repair with single incision technique and anchor fixation overall leads to a very satisfying outcome.

RESUMEN

Background: Treatment modalities for partial distal biceps tendon (DBT) ruptures include conservative management (immobilization, medication, and physical therapy) or surgery. Selecting treatment modality can present a challenge to both patient and provider. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that patients undergoing surgical treatment for partial DBT rupture would have higher complications but better overall strength, range of motion (ROM), and patient satisfaction. Study Design: Systematic Review. Methods: A systematic review was performed in adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Cochrane, Embase, and Medline databases were searched for studies published through May 2023. Studies were included if they examined patients with a partial DBT rupture who underwent treatment. Exclusion criteria were non-human studies, studies not in English, reviews, technical notes, letters to the editor, surgical technique papers, and studies reported in a prior review. Results: 13 studies consisting of 290 patients with a partial DBT tear were included in this review. 75% of the patients were male and the ages ranged from 23 - 75 years. The follow up for the patients ranged from 1 - 94 months. 55 patients underwent conservative treatment versus 256 patients underwent surgical treatment. Outcomes examined by the studies included pain, strength, range of motion (ROM), complications, patient reported outcomes (PROs), return to activity, and patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Treatment for partial DBT tear via surgery or conservative treatment both produce good clinical outcomes. There are similar outcomes between treatment options for pain and ROM. Conservative treatment had some poorer outcomes in terms of strength after treatment. Surgical treatment had more complications and a few patients with decreased satisfaction. Overall, both are viable treatment options, requiring a physician and patient discussion regarding the pros and cons of both options as a part of a shared decision-making process that incorporates patient priorities.

RESUMEN

Background Distal biceps tendon (DBT) rupture is not one of the most common upper limb injuries. Surgical intervention is recommended for these injuries to restore muscular strength and functionality. Multiple different techniques are documented in the literature, however there is no definitive consensus on the most effective surgical treatment. The objective of this study was to assess the functional results of patients who underwent repair of DBT utilizing cortical button fixation procedures. Methods This study is a retrospective single-unit case series consisting of 54 patients who underwent DBT repair at Heartlands Hospital in Birmingham, United Kingdom. The patients' functional outcomes was assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Results The mean age was 51±11.01 years. Patients were operated on 4.72±7.083 days after the injury. The mean pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 6 months after the surgery was 0.54±0.50. At 6 months follow-up, the average extension deficit was 2.69° (0-10), flexion 132° (120-140), supination76° (50- 85), and 77° for pronation (78-95). Patients were followed up routinely for 6 months. Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) Score was utilized to assess the functional outcome and the mean MEP score was 91.43±8.26 which showed excellent functional outcomes for the cohort. Conclusion DBT repair with cortical button fixation yielded favorable functional outcomes at 6 months, notably restoring supination strength. This approach offers anatomical reinsertion while minimizing nerve damage risk.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Distal biceps tendon repair is usually performed via a double-incision or single-incision bicortical drilling technique. However, these techniques are associated with specific complications and usually do not allow for anatomic footprint restoration. It was the aim of this study to report the clinical results of a double intracortical button anatomic footprint repair technique for distal biceps tendon tears. We hypothesized that this technique would result in supination strength comparable to the uninjured side with a low rerupture rate and minimal bony or neurologic complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-surgeon cohort study of a consecutive series of 22 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 50.7 (9.4) years and at least 1-year follow-up after distal biceps tendon repair. At final follow-up, complications, range of motion (ROM), the Patient-rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, patient satisfaction, and supination strength in neutral as well as 60° of supination were analyzed. Radiographic evaluation was performed on a computed tomography scan. RESULTS: One patient (4.5%) experienced slight paresthesia in the area of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve. Heterotopic ossification was seen in 1 patient (4.5%). All patients recovered full ROM except for 1 who had 10° of loss of flexion and extension. Median PREE score was 4.6 (0-39.6), median MEP was 100 (70-100), and median DASH score was 1.4 (0-16.7). All but 1 patient were very satisfied with the outcome. The affected arm had a mean of 98% (±13%) of neutral supination strength (P = .633) and 94% (±12%) of supination strength in 60° (P = .054) compared with the contralateral, unaffected side. There were 4 cases (18.2%) of cortical thinning due to at least 1 button and 1 case of button pullout (4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The double intracortical button anatomic footprint repair technique seems to provide reliable restoration of supination strength and excellent patient satisfaction while minimizing complications, particularly nerve damage and heterotopic ossification.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The distal rupture of the biceps brachii muscle tendon (DBT) accounts for 3% of biceps ruptures. Diagnosis typically relies on high clinical suspicion and complementary imaging studies, with >90% of cases documented in males between the fourth and sixth decades of life. Reports of DBT ruptures in females are scarce, mostly involving partial and degenerative injuries. Here, we present an unprecedented case of a 28-year-old female professional mixed martial arts athlete with a total traumatic DBT rupture. The athlete underwent surgical repair using anchor reattachment technique. No complications were observed, and the athlete showed satisfactory outcomes, being cleared for physiotherapy after 2 weeks and returning to sports after a 3-month postoperative period.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that hypertrophy of the radial tuberosity may result in impingement leading to either a lesion of the distal biceps tendon or rotational impairment. Two previous studies on hypertrophy of the radial tuberosity had contradictory results and did not examine the distance between the radius and ulna: the radioulnar window. Therefore, this comparative cohort study aimed to investigate the radioulnar window in healthy subjects and compare it with that in subjects with either nontraumatic-onset rotational impairment of the forearm or nontraumatic-onset distal biceps tendon ruptures with rotational impairment of the forearm by use of dynamic 3-dimensional computed tomography measurements to attain a comprehensive understanding of the underlying etiology of distal biceps tendon ruptures. We hypothesized that a smaller radioulnar window would increase the risk of having a nontraumatic-onset distal biceps tendon rupture and/or rotational impairment compared with healthy individuals. METHODS: This study measured the distance between the radius and ulna at the level of the radial tuberosity using entire-forearm computed tomography scans of 15 patients at the Amphia Hospital between 2019 and 2022. Measurements of healthy subjects were compared with those of subjects who had nontraumatic-onset rotational impairment of the forearm and subjects who had a nontraumatic-onset distal biceps tendon rupture with rotational impairment of the forearm. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for individual comparisons, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for group comparisons. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between the radioulnar window in the forearms of the subjects with a distal biceps tendon rupture (mean, 1.6 mm; standard deviation 0.2 mm) and the radioulnar window in the forearms of the healthy subjects (mean, 4.8 mm; standard deviation, 1.4 mm; P = .018). A trend toward smaller radioulnar windows in the rotational impairment groups was also observed, although it was not significant (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The radioulnar window in the forearms of the subjects with a distal biceps tendon rupture with rotational impairment was significantly smaller than that in the forearms of the healthy subjects. Therefore, patients with a smaller radioulnar window have a higher risk of rupturing the distal biceps tendon. Nontraumatic-onset rotational impairment of the forearm may also be caused by a similar mechanism. Future studies are needed to further evaluate these findings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical repair of distal biceps tendon injury restores flexion and supination strength, resulting in good functional outcome. There are few studies that consider clinical results of the operated arm compared to the healthy contralateral arm, whereas there are many articles examining the results of different surgical techniques. We carried out a systematic review with meta-analysis of the studies that consider this comparison. The aim was to evaluate if there are significative differences in terms of functional results between the operated arm and the non-injured contralateral arm. In fact, we believe that this comparison is useful for assessing patient true satisfaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In accordance with the PRISMA and QUORUM statements, a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify studies reporting comparative functional results of the operated arm with healthy contralateral arm from January 1985 until November 2022. Criteria for inclusion were acute complete injury of the distal biceps' tendon operated within 30days; range of motion (ROM), isokinetic and isometric strength measurements; minimum patients follow-up of 24months; studies written in English language. Then a DerSimonian and Laird meta-analysis was conducted to compare the functional outcomes of the operated arm to the non-injured arm. RESULTS: Of the 588 initial studies, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria; methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A total of 272 surgically treated distal biceps ruptures were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was of 39.6months (24 to 72months). ROM flexion, pronation, and supination of the operated elbows were significantly decreased, with mean differences of -1.24̊ (p=0.004), -7.95̊ (p=0.003), and -9.27̊ (p=0.004) respectively, compared to the non-injured healthy elbows. The difference of ROM extension was not-statistically significant (+0.21̊; p=0.66). The Isokinetic data showed a statistically significant reduction in the flexion strength (-4.56Nm; p=0.0004) and a statistical significative reduction in the supination strength (-1.18 Nm; p=0.02) of the injured operated arm compared with the healthy one. The forest-plot table of the isometric data was not elaborated due to the small number of studies eligible for the meta-analysis. DISCUSSION: This study represents the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare functional and clinical outcomes following operative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures with the contralateral healthy arm. Significant differences in ROM flexion, supination, and pronation and in isokinetic and isometric data were found between the operated and non-operated unaffected arm, demonstrating that, as expected, the unaffected arm performed better than the operated one. However, the functional differences between the data of the operated and healthy arm were slight and lead us to overall consider surgery as good functional result. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III.

RESUMEN

Distal biceps tendon (DBT) is a relatively rare injury mainly occurring in middle-aged men while in eccentric biceps muscle contraction. Clinical appearance with proximal avulsion of the muscle and specific clinical tests are most of the time sufficient for diagnosing DBT, but if needed ultrasonography and MRI, most often in FABS view, can be used to ensure diagnosis of DBT and partial DBT. Surgical anatomical reinsertion has shown to be a successful method of treatment, although conservative treatment can be initiated in older patients. Two different approaches are described in literature: single- and double-incision techniques with different fixation methods proving to have similarly good results. Major complications of surgical intervention are posterior interosseous nerve palsy and symptomatic heterotropic ossification. Overall outcome of surgical intervention has shown high subjective satisfaction with slight weakness in flexion and supination but mostly without loss in range of motion.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is minimal literature on the morphology of partial distal biceps tendon (DBT) tears. We sought to investigate tear morphology by retrospectively reviewing 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3T MRI) scans of elbows with partial DBT tears and to propose a basic classification system. METHODS: 3T MRI scans of elbows with partial DBT tears were retrospectively reviewed by two experienced observers. Basic demographic data were collected. Tear morphology was recorded including type, presence of retraction (>5 mm), and presence of discrete long-head and short-head tendons at the DBT insertion. RESULTS: For analysis, 44 3T MRI scans of 44 elbows with partial DBT tears were included. There were 9 isolated long-head tears (20%), 13 isolated short-head tears (30%), 2 complete long-head tears with a partial short-head tear (5%), 5 complete short-head tears with a partial long-head tear (11%), and 15 peel-off tears (34%). Retraction was seen in 5 or 44 partial tears (11%), and 13 of the 44 DBTs were bifid tendons at the insertion (30%). CONCLUSIONS: Partial DBT tears can be classified into five sub-types: long-head isolated tears, short-head isolated tears, complete long-head tears with partial short-head involvement, complete short-head tears with partial long-head involvement, and peel-off tears. Classification of tears may have implications for operative and non-operative management. Level of evidence: III.

RESUMEN

Background: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the single-incision technique with a distal biceps repair system versus the modified double-incision technique, specifically the Morrey-modified approach, Krackow sutures, and drill holes, for the management of acute and chronic distal biceps tendon rupture. The study was conducted at the Orthopedic-Traumatology Clinic II of SCJUPBT Timisoara, Romania, between 2014 and 2022. Methods: A total of sixty-nine patients with acute distal biceps tendon rupture and five patients with chronic distal tendon rupture were included in the study. Forty-eight cases underwent the single-incision technique with the distal biceps repair system, while twenty-four patients were treated with the modified double-incision technique. Results: Both surgical techniques demonstrated favorable outcomes in terms of successful tendon repair and functional restoration. However, the single-incision technique exhibited slightly superior results in terms of patient satisfaction, range of motion, and postoperative rehabilitation. The modified double-incision technique showed comparable outcomes but had a higher incidence of complications, particularly related to wound healing. Conclusion: The single-incision technique with the distal biceps repair system and the modified double-incision technique, including the Morrey-modified approach, Krackow sutures, and drill holes, are effective surgical approaches for the management of distal biceps tendon rupture. The single-incision technique yielded better functional outcomes and patient satisfaction, while the modified double-incision technique had a higher risk of complications. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is necessary to validate these findings and determine the most appropriate surgical approach for distal biceps tendon rupture.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps tendon ruptures are relatively rare injuries that typically require surgical intervention to restore flexion and supination strength. Concerns have been raised regarding the risk of nerve injuries, particularly the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN), associated with the use of cortical buttons in distal biceps repair. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of PIN injury as well as injuries to the lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm and superficial branch of the radial nerve following distal biceps repair using cortical buttons. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who underwent distal biceps repair with cortical buttons at a district general hospital between January 2014 and May 2022. Patient data, including age, gender, time from injury to surgery, type of procedure, and postoperative nerve injuries, were collected. The incidence of nerve injuries was analyzed, and the outcomes were assessed during postoperative follow-up visits. RESULTS: Ninety-six male patients were included in the study, with an average age of 45.6 years. The average time from injury to surgery was 22.6 days. All patients underwent primary repair except for two patients who underwent reconstruction with hamstring grafts. None of the patients experienced a PIN injury. However, 16 patients (16.7%) developed lateral cutaneous nerve injuries of the forearm, and three patients (3.1%) had superficial radial nerve injuries. CONCLUSION: Our study, encompassing a large cohort of patients over an eight-year period, demonstrates the safety of distal biceps repair using cortical buttons with regard to PIN nerve injury. However, there were incidences of lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm and superficial radial nerve injuries, consistent with previous studies.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although the initial description of the distal biceps tendon (DBT) hook test (HT) reported 100% sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp), subsequent retrospective series have demonstrated imperfect validity. The purpose of this investigation was to prospectively assess the validity and reliability of the HT for complete DBT ruptures. We aimed to determine the Sn/Sp and interrater reliability for the HT. METHODS: A consecutive series of adult patients presenting to our outpatient clinics with an elbow complaint was prospectively examined. Patients were included if they had undergone advanced imaging (magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound) that imaged the DBT and underwent DBT repair. There were four participating surgeons, all of whom were blinded to magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound prior to performing the HT. To determine the Sn/Sp of the HT and advanced imaging, intraoperative findings served as the primary reference standard. The interrater reliability of the HT was calculated for cases in which a primary examiner (surgeon) and secondary examiner (physician assistant or resident) performed the HT. RESULTS: Of 64 patients who had undergone advanced imaging, 28 (44%) underwent DBT surgery and were included in the assessment of Sn/Sp. The mean age was 49 years, and all patients were men. The Sn and Sp of the HT were 96% and 67%, respectively. Advanced imaging demonstrated 100% Sn and Sp. Twenty-five patients were evaluated by a primary and secondary examiner. The interrater reliability was substantial (Cohen kappa, 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The Sn and Sp of the HT were 96% and 67%, respectively, when assessed prospectively. Advanced imaging findings (magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound) demonstrated 100% Sn and Sp. The HT can be performed reliably by examiners with varying experience levels. Considering the imperfect validity of the HT, we caution against the use of this examination alone to diagnose DBT ruptures. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background There are a number of different techniques available for the repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Recent evidence has revealed satisfactory clinical outcomes for suture button techniques. Aims The aim of this study was to determine if the ToggleLocTM soft tissue fixation device (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana) confers satisfactory clinical outcomes in the surgical management of distal biceps ruptures. Methods Twelve consecutive patients underwent distal biceps repair using the ToggleLocTM soft tissue fixation device over a two-year period. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were collected by means of validated questionnaires on two occasions. Symptoms and function were quantified using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES). Patient-reported health scores were determined using the EQ-5D-3L (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version) questionnaire. Results The mean initial follow-up time was 10.4 months and the mean final follow-up time was 34.6 months. The mean DASH score at the initial follow-up was 5.9 (se = 3.6), compared to 2.9 (se = 1.0) at the final follow-up (p = 0.30). The mean OES at the initial follow-up was 91.5 (se = 4.1); and 91.5 (se = 5.2) at the final follow-up (p = 0.23). The mean EQ-5D-3L level sum score at the initial follow-up was 5.3 (se = 0.3); and 5.8 (se = 0.5) at the final follow-up (p = 0.34). Discussion The ToggleLocTM soft tissue fixation device confers satisfactory clinical outcomes, as determined by PROMS, in the surgical management of distal biceps ruptures.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) is the most commonly injured motor nerve during distal biceps tendon repair resulting in severe functional deficits. Anatomic studies of distal biceps tendon repairs have evaluated the proximity of the PIN to the anterior radial shaft in supination, but limited studies have evaluated the location of the PIN in relation to the radial tuberosity (RT), and none have examined its relation to the subcutaneous border of the ulna (SBU) with varying forearm rotation. This study evaluates the location of the PIN in relation to the RT and SBU to help guide surgeons in safe placement of the dorsal incision and the safest zones of dissection. METHODS: The PIN was dissected from arcade of Frohse to 2 cm distal to the RT in 18 cadaver specimens. Four lines were drawn perpendicular to the radial shaft at the proximal, middle, and distal aspect of and 1 cm distal to the RT in the lateral view. Measurements were recorded with a digital caliper along these lines to quantify the distance between the SBU and RT to the PIN with the forearm in neutral, supination, and pronation with the elbow at 90° flexion. Measurements were also made along the length of the radius at the volar, middle, and dorsal surfaces at the distal aspect of the RT to assess its proximity to the PIN. RESULTS: Mean distances to the PIN were greater in pronation than supination and neutral. The PIN crossed the volar surface of the distal aspect of the RT -6.9 ± 4.3 mm (-13, -3.0) in supination, -0.4 ± 5.8 mm (-9.9, 2.5) in neutral, and 8.5 ± 9.9 mm (-2.7, 13) in pronation. One centimeter distal to the RT, mean distance to the PIN was 0.54 ± 4.3 mm (-4.5, 8.8) in supination, 8.5 ± 3.1 mm (3.2, 14) in neutral, and 10 ± 2.7 mm (4.9, 16) in pronation. In pronation, mean distances from the SBU to the PIN at points A, B, C, and D were 41.3 ± 4.2, 38.1 ± 4.4, 34.9 ± 4.2, and 30.8 ± 3.9 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: PIN location is quite variable, and to avoid iatrogenic injury during 2-incision distal biceps tendon repair, we recommend placement of the dorsal incision no more than 25 mm anterior to the SBU and carrying out deep dissection proximally first to identify the RT before continuing the dissection distally to expose the tendon footprint. The PIN was at risk of injury along the volar surface at the distal aspect of the RT in 50% with neutral rotation and 17% with full pronation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Extracortical single-button (SB) inlay repair is a commonly used distal biceps tendon technique. However, complications (eg, neurovascular injury) and nonanatomic repairs have led to the development of intracortical fixation techniques. PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical stability of extracortical SB repair with an anatomic intracortical double-button (DB) repair technique. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: The distal biceps tendon was transected in 18 cadaveric elbows from 9 donors. One elbow of each donor was randomly assigned to the extracortical SB or anatomic DB group. Both groups were cyclically loaded with 60 N over 1000 cycles between 90° of flexion and full extension. The elbow was then fixed in 90° of flexion and the repair construct loaded to failure. Gap formation and construct stiffness during cyclic loading and ultimate load to failure were analyzed. RESULTS: When compared with the extracortical SB technique after 1000 cycles, the anatomic DB technique showed significantly less gap formation (mean ± SD, 2.7 ± 0.8 vs 1.5 ± 0.9 mm; P = .017) and significantly more construct stiffness (87.4 ± 32.7 vs 119.9 ± 31.6 N/mm; P = .023). Ultimate load to failure was not significantly different between the groups (277 ± 93 vs 285 ± 135 N; P = .859). The failure mode in the anatomic DB group was significantly different from that of the extracortical SB technique (P = .002) and was due to fracture avulsion of the cortical button in 7 of 9 specimens (vs none in the SB group). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the intracortical DB technique produces equivalent or superior biomechanical performance to that of the SB technique. The DB technique may offer a clinically viable alternative to the SB repair technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests, at worst, an equivalent and, at best, a superior biomechanical performance of intracortical anatomic DB footprint repair at the time of surgery. However, the mode of failure suggests that this technique should not be used in patients with poor bone quality.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the United States, the use of testosterone therapy has increased over recent years. Anabolic steroid use has been associated with tendon rupture, although there is a paucity of evidence evaluating the risk of biceps tendon injury (BTI) with testosterone therapy. The aim of this study was to quantify the risk of BTI after the initiation of testosterone therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the PearlDiver database. Records between 2011 and 2018 were queried to identify patients aged 35-75 years who filled a testosterone prescription for a minimum of 3 months. A control group was created, comprising patients aged 35-75 years who had never filled a prescription for exogenous testosterone. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients with distal biceps injuries and those undergoing surgical repair. Three matching processes were completed: one for the overall cohort, one for the cohort comprising only male patients, and one for the cohort comprising only female patients. Each cohort was matched to its control on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, diabetes, tobacco use, and osteoporosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare rates of distal BTI and subsequent surgical repair in the testosterone groups with their control groups. RESULTS: A total of 776,974 patients had filled a prescription for testosterone for a minimum of 3 consecutive months. In the overall matched analysis between the testosterone and control groups (n = 291,610 in both), the mean age of the patients was 53.9 years and 23.1% were women. Within 1 year of filling exogenous testosterone prescriptions for a minimum of 3 consecutive months, 650 patients experienced a distal BTI compared with 159 patients in the control group (odds ratio [OR], 4.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.45-4.89; P < .001). At any time after testosterone therapy, patients with testosterone use were more than twice as likely to experience a distal BTI as their matched controls (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.94-2.38). Patients who filled prescriptions for testosterone were more likely to undergo surgical repair within a year of the injury compared with the control group. A similar trend was seen in the cohort comprising male patients (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.29-2.07). CONCLUSION: Patients with prior prescription testosterone exposure have an increased rate of BTI and biceps tendon repair compared with patients without such exposure. This finding provides insight into the risk profile of testosterone therapy, and doctors should consider counseling patients about this risk, particularly male patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the event of a rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii, most authors recommend early reinsertion to recover optimal elbow function. However, these ruptures are not always diagnosed or promptly referred to surgeons, thus creating a delay in treatment. Studies reporting functional results in cases of chronic repair (greater than 21 days) of the distal biceps brachii tendon show an increased rate of complications. HYPOTHESIS: Primary repairs of chronic ruptures (treatment delayed for more than 21 days) and acute ruptures of the distal biceps give the same functional results and the same rate of complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study between January 2017 and December 2021 comparing chronic primary repair of the distal biceps at the elbow (experimental group, comprising 75 patients) and acute (control group, comprising 135 patients) by endobutton. We analyzed the time between trauma and surgery, and assessed short- and long-term functional recovery by measuring residual pain (VAS), a collection of the following functional scores: Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) and Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), as well as a measure of strength (as a percentage of the healthy side). We evaluated the rate of complications and radiographically analyzed the rate of heterotopic ossification. RESULTS: The mean time between trauma and surgery was 73±66 days (experimental group) versus 11.2±5 days (control group). In the short-term (4.79±2.09 months), there was no significant difference in the MEPS, Q-DASH and PREE functional scores between the two groups (p=0.354, p=0.412 and p=0.958, respectively). In the long-term (28.9±17.9 months), the functional evolution remained similar. The recovery of strength in flexion and supination was 89.19±13.43% and 77.48±16.68%, respectively, and similar in the two cohorts (p=0.476 and p=0.395). There was no difference in the rate of complications; however, the rate of heterotopic ossification was higher in the control group (p=0.006). DISCUSSION: The functional results and the recovery of strength did not change according to the time until surgery. Although the overall complication rate was similar, repairs of the biceps in less than 21 days led to more heterotopic ossification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective case-control study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This case study describes a patient with a clinically ruptured distal biceps tendon, with ultrasound detecting an isolated rupture of the medial bundle of a bifid distal biceps tendon. A 45-year-old male presented to the accident and emergency department with a week-old history of a right elbow injury. The ultrasound scan demonstrated a hypoechoic, corrugated distal biceps tendon with a tendon stump close to the radial tuberosity insertion in keeping with a rupture. However, a small caliber accessory or bifid distal biceps tendon was also identified and was intact. Typically, distal biceps tendon ruptures occur following a traumatic event with most detected clinically although imaging is required to confirm the diagnosis. Ultrasound is utilized to assess these injuries, and several different techniques or approaches are described in the literature. A combination of these approaches is required to make an accurate diagnosis. Detection of bifid distal biceps tendons is important for patient management, especially if a surgical repair is considered. This case highlights the anatomical variant of a bifid distal biceps tendon, which was ruptured clinically. The ultrasound diagnosis of distal biceps tendon ruptures can be challenging, especially when there is limited tendon retraction. This case also demonstrated the importance of dynamic ultrasound in the assessment of tendon ruptures.

RESUMEN

AIMS: The conventionally described mechanism of distal biceps tendon rupture (DBTR) is of a 'considerable extension force suddenly applied to a resisting, actively flexed forearm'. This has been commonly paraphrased as an 'eccentric contracture to a flexed elbow'. Both definitions have been frequently used in the literature with little objective analysis or citation. The aim of the present study was to use video footage of real time distal biceps ruptures to revisit and objectively define the mechanism of injury. METHODS: An online search identified 61 videos reporting a DBTR. Videos were independently reviewed by three surgeons to assess forearm rotation, elbow flexion, shoulder position, and type of muscle contraction being exerted at the time of rupture. Prospective data on mechanism of injury and arm position was also collected concurrently for 22 consecutive patients diagnosed with an acute DBTR in order to corroborate the video analysis. RESULTS: Four videos were excluded, leaving 57 for final analysis. Mechanisms of injury included deadlift, bicep curls, calisthenics, arm wrestling, heavy lifting, and boxing. In all, 98% of ruptures occurred with the arm in supination and 89% occurred at 0° to 10° of elbow flexion. Regarding muscle activity, 88% occurred during isometric contraction, 7% during eccentric contraction, and 5% during concentric contraction. Interobserver correlation scores were calculated as 0.66 to 0.89 using the free-marginal Fleiss Kappa tool. The prospectively collected patient data was consistent with the video analysis, with 82% of injuries occurring in supination and 95% in relative elbow extension. CONCLUSION: Contrary to the classically described injury mechanism, in this study the usual arm position during DBTR was forearm supination and elbow extension, and the muscle contraction was typically isometric. This was demonstrated for both video analysis and 'real' patients across a range of activities leading to rupture.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):826-831.

RESUMEN

Background: Acute distal biceps tendon ruptures result in weakness and deformity. While in other jurisdictions the rate of surgical repair has outpaced rises in incidence, UK practice for distal biceps tendon ruptures is unknown. The aim of this survey was to characterise current UK clinical practice. Methods: An online survey was sent to the surgeon members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Questions covered respondent demographics, clinical decision making, surgical experience and willingness to be involved in future research. Results: A total of 242 surgeons responded; 99% undertook acute distal biceps tendon repairs with 83% repairing at least half of all distal biceps tendon ruptures, and 84% of surgeons would have their own, hypothetical, acute distal biceps tendon rupture repaired in their dominant arm and 67% for their non-dominant arm. Patient age, occupation and restoration of strength were the commonest factors underpinning a recommendation of surgical fixation. Most surgeons (87%) supported a national trial to study operative and non-operative treatments. Conclusions: UK upper limb surgeons currently advise surgical repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures for the majority of their patients. This is despite a paucity of evidence to support improved outcomes following surgical, rather than non-operative, management. There is a clear need for robust clinical evaluation in this area.