RESUMEN

The approval of biologics, namely belimumab and anifrolumab, is being a game-changer in the approach to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Currently we are indeed facing a revolution in the treatment paradigm of SLE, encompassing early combination of biologics with standard treatment in severe manifestations. In this regard, a lively discussion is taking place regarding the better positioning of biologics in the treatment of not necessarily severe, yet refractory and/or disfiguring manifestations which expose patients to worsened quality of life, reduced workability and enhanced risk of organ damage especially related to the misuse of glucocorticoids in the long run. Growing evidence supports the early use of targeted treatments in those patients, including the use of biologics before traditional immunosuppression, to achieve control of disease activity while minimizing treatment-related damage, privileging the timely use of therapeutics selectively impacting on key disease mechanisms in spite of a widespread immunosuppression. Patient profiling on a clinical and endotypical basis is helping in identifying better candidates to targeted drugs. More inflammatory organ involvement including persistent arthritis and infiltrating skin lesions seem likely to respond to anifrolumab, while B-mediated manifestations, a lively serology and a relapsing-remitting SLE course hint at a suitable role for belimumab. This seems at least partially connected to the inner effect of either drug, dampening inflammation through down-regulation of interferon signalling in the case of anifrolumab, while plastically modulating the B cell pool composition and function when coming to belimumab. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of both drugs are immunologically entangled at some extent, thereby requiring careful management especially in patients with longer disease history burdened with mixed manifestations. In this viewpoint we go over pros and cons of anticipatory biologic use in SLE, exploring features linked with better efficacy of either drug and the pathogenic and practical rationale for their positioning before traditional immunosuppression in moderate refractory SLE to be optimally managed in the 21st Century.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cytokine release profile and histological response of human cartilage after exposure to autologous conditioned serum (ACS) and freeze-dried allogenic conditioned serum (FD-CS). DESIGN: Cartilage explants were collected from 6 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. ACS and FD-CS were created from patient serum samples. Cartilage samples were divided into 6 groups: (1) untreated control, (2) ACS, (3) FD-CS, (4) untreated interleukin (IL)-1ß (5 ng/ml), (5) IL-1ß + ACS, and (6) IL-1ß + FD-CS. After 12 days, cartilage samples were analyzed with glycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentration normalized to wet weight while comparing cytokine concentrations, and histological scoring. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in pathology scoring for ACS (P = 0.0368) and FD-CS (P = 0.0368) in the IL-1ß injury groups compared with the untreated IL-1ß insult group. ACS and FD-CS significantly mitigate the IL-1ß induced increase in basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (P = 0.0009 and P = 0.0002, respectively). FD-CS showed a significant decrease in IL-1ß concentration in the presence of IL-1ß insult compared with the untreated IL-1ß group (P < 0.0001). ACS-treated samples had significantly higher concentration of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α independent of IL-1ß when compared with samples not treated with biologics (P = 0.0053). CONCLUSIONS: Explanted osteoarthritic cartilage responds favorably and equivalently to treatment with ACS and FD-CS from a histological perspective. Both ACS and FD-CS were able to mitigate the IL-1ß-induced increases in bFGF and FD-CS lowered IL-1ß concentration while increasing interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) concentration. Although the cytokine profile of cartilage tissue explants treated with FD-CS appears to be different than that of ACS, this difference does not seem to affect biologic activity of FD-CS.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The dopamine transporter striatal binding ratio (DAT SBR) has been used as an outcome measure in Parkinson's disease (PD) trials of potential disease-modifying therapies; however, both patient characteristics and analysis approach potentially complicate its interpretation. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to explore how well DAT SBR reflects PD motor severity across different striatal subregions and the relationship to disease duration, and side of onset. METHODS: DAT SBR for the anterior and posterior putamen and caudate in both hemispheres was obtained using validated automated quantitative software on baseline scans of 132 patients recruited for the Exenatide PD2 and PD3 trials. Associations between mean and lateralized SBR subregions (posterior and anterior putamen and caudate) and summed and lateralized motor characteristics were explored using regression analysis. Analyses were repeated considering disease duration and limiting analysis to the less-affected hemisphere. RESULTS: Lateralized bradykinesia was most consistently associated with the loss of DAT uptake in the contralateral anterior putamen. There was much higher variance in the posterior putamen, and in all regions in those with longer duration disease, although bradykinesia remained robustly associated with anterior putaminal DAT uptake even in longer-duration patients. Restricting analyses to the less-affected side did not usefully reduce the variance compared to the overall cohort. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that DAT SBR could be a useful biomarker in disease-modifying trials, but a focus on anterior striatal subregions and incorporating disease duration into analyses may improve its utility.

RESUMEN

The Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders predominantly occurring in elderly, whereas in children and young adults are quite infrequent. Therefore, less is known about clinical presentation, genetic abnormalities, prognosis and best management strategies for this groups of patients. Currently, more cases of younger MPN patients are diagnosed. Nevertheless, diagnosis of MPNs, especially in childhood, may be difficult due to lower incidence of JAK2V617F and CALR mutations and differences in peripheral blood counts between adults and children. Challenges for younger MPN patients are longer life expectances, specific psychosocial need, fertility and pregnancy need and a long term therapy side effect (including second cancers). The most severe MPNs complication is transformation to secondary myelofibrosis (MF) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Optimal management of young MPNs remains a challenge as the classical risk scores fail in young MPNs. Moreover, the main objective of young MPNs therapy should be the disease outcome modification. Therefore, international collaborative work between pediatricians and "adult hematologists" is required to measure outcomes and generate protocol of management of young MPNs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The approved amyloid antibodies for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) carry a boxed warning about the risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs) that are highest in apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4/ε4 homozygotes. ALZ-801/valiltramiprosate, an oral brain-penetrant amyloid beta oligomer inhibitor is being evaluated in APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes with early AD. METHODS: This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 78-week study of ALZ-801 administered as 265 mg twice per day tablets, enrolled 50- to 80-year-old homozygotes with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 22 and Clinical Dementia Rating-Global Score 0.5 or 1.0. The study is powered to detect a 2.0 to 2.5 drug-placebo difference on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale 13-item Cognitive subscale primary outcome with 150 subjects/arm. The key secondary outcomes are Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; volumetric magnetic resonance imaging and fluid biomarkers are additional outcomes. RESULTS: The APOLLOE4 Phase 3 trial enrolled 325 subjects with a mean age of 69 years, 51% female, MMSE 25.6, and 65% mild cognitive impairment. Topline results are expected in 2024. DISCUSSION: APOLLOE4 is the first disease-modification AD trial focused on APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes. Oral ALZ-801 has the potential to be the first effective and safe anti-amyloid treatment for the high-risk APOE ε4/ε4 population. Highlights: The APOLLOE4 Phase 3, placebo-controlled, 78-week study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ALZ-801 265 mg twice per day in early Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects with the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4/ε4 genotype.The enrolled early AD population (N = 325) has 51% females, a mean age = 69 years, and a mean Mini-Mental State Examination = 25.6, with the majority being mild cognitive impairment subjects, a similar disease stage to the lecanemab Phase 3 AD trial (Clarity AD).The primary outcome is the cognitive Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale 13-item Cognitive subscale, with two functional measures as key secondary outcomes (Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, Amsterdam-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living), and with hippocampal volume and fluid biomarkers as additional outcomes.The study is unique in allowing a large number of microhemorrhages or siderosis at baseline magnetic resonance imaging, lesions that indicate concomitant cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA).At baseline, 32% of the enrolled population had at least 1 microhemorrhage, 24% had 1 to 4, and 8% had > 4 microhemorrhages; 10% had at least 1 siderosis lesion; with more males than females having microhemorrhages (63% vs. 37%) and siderosis (68% vs. 32%).Study results will become available in the second half of 2024 and, if positive, ALZ-801 may become the first oral drug to demonstrate a favorable benefit/risk profile in APOE ε4/ε4 AD subjects.

RESUMEN

Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of an allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell preparation (MAG200) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis over 12 months. Design: A single-centre, double-blind, ascending dose, randomised controlled trial. 40 participants with moderate knee osteoarthritis were randomised to receive a single intra-articular injection of MAG200 (dose cohorts:10, 20, 50, 100 â€‹× â€‹106 â€‹cells) or placebo. Primary objectives were safety and efficacy according to a compound responder analysis of minimal clinically important difference in pain (numerical pain rating scale [NPRS]) and function (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Function in Daily Living subscale [KOOSADL]) at month 12. Secondary efficacy outcomes included changes from baseline in patient reported outcome measures and evaluation of disease-modification using quantitative MRI. Results: Treatment was well tolerated with no treatment-related serious adverse events. MAG200 cohorts reported a greater proportion of responders than placebo and demonstrated clinical and statistically significant improvement in pain and clinically relevant improvement in all KOOS subscales. MAG200 demonstrated a reproducible treatment effect over placebo, which was clinically relevant for pain in the 10 â€‹× â€‹106 dose cohort (mean difference NPRS:-2.25[95%CI:-4.47,-0.03, p â€‹= â€‹0.0468]) and for function in the 20 â€‹× â€‹106 and 100 â€‹× â€‹106 dose cohorts (mean difference KOOSADL:10.12[95%CI:-1.51,21.76, p â€‹= â€‹0.0863] and 10.81[95%CI:-1.42,23.04, p â€‹= â€‹0.0810] respectively). A trend in disease-modification was observed with improvement in total knee cartilage volume in MAG200 10, 20, and 100 â€‹× â€‹106 dose cohorts, with progression of osteoarthritis in placebo, though this was not statistically significant. No clear dose response was observed. Conclusion: This early-phase study provides supportive safety and efficacy evidence to progress MAG200 to later-stage trial development. Trial registration: ACTRN12617001095358/ACTRN12621000622808.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Recent clinical trials of amyloid beta (Aß)-targeting therapies in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have demonstrated a clinical benefit over 18 months, but their long-term impact on disease trajectory is not yet understood. We propose a framework for evaluating realistic long-term scenarios. METHODS: Results from recent phase 3 trials of Aß-targeting antibodies were integrated with an estimate of the long-term patient-level natural history trajectory of the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score to explore realistic long-term efficacy scenarios. RESULTS: Three distinct long-term efficacy scenarios were examined, ranging from conservative to optimistic. These extrapolations of positive phase 3 trials suggested treatments delayed onset of severe dementia by 0.3 to 0.6 years (conservative), 1.1 to 1.9 years (intermediate), and 2.0 to 4.2 years (optimistic). DISCUSSION: Our study provides a common language for long-term impact of disease-modifying treatments. Our work calls for studies with longer follow-up and results from early intervention trials to provide a comprehensive assessment of these therapies' true long-term impact. HIGHLIGHTS: We present long-term scenarios of the efficacy of AD therapies. In this framework, scenarios are defined relative to the natural history of AD. Long-term projections with different levels of optimism can be compared. It provides a common language for expressing beliefs about long-term efficacy.

RESUMEN

Background: For the past five years, our annual reports have been tracking the clinical development of new drug-based therapies for the neurodegenerative condition of Parkinson's disease (PD). These reviews have followed the progress both of "symptomatic treatments" (ST - improves/reduces symptoms of the condition) and "disease-modifying treatments" (DMT - attempts to delay/slow progression by addressing the underlying biology of PD). Efforts have also been made to further categorize these experimental treatments based on their mechanisms of action and class of drug. Methods: A dataset of clinical trials for drug therapies in PD using trial data downloaded from the ClinicalTrials.gov online registry was generated. A breakdown analysis of all the studies that were active as of January 31st, 2024, was conducted. This analysis involved categorizing the trials based on both the mechanism of action (MOA) and the drug target. Results: There were 136 active Phase 1-3 trials evaluating drug therapies for PD registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, as of January 31, 2024. Of these trials, 76 (56%) were classified as ST trials and 60 (44%) were designated DMT. More than half (58%) of the trials were in Phase 2 testing stage, followed by Phase 1 (30%) and Phase 3 (12%). 35 of the trials were registered since our last report, with the remaining 101 trials appearing in at least one earlier report. Conclusions: The drug development pipeline for PD remains in a robust state with a wide variety of approaches being developed and evaluated in Phase 1 and 2. Yet again, however, only a limited number of DMTs are transitioning to Phase 3.

The development of new medical therapies, particularly for neurodegenerative conditions, is a long process that involves multiple phases of testing before a treatment is approved for use in a doctor's clinic. The first phase assesses the short-term safety of a drug ­ most often in healthy volunteers but sometimes in people affected by the disease. The second phase explores the short-term safety and preliminary efficacy of the agent in people affected by the disease of interest, and the third phase investigates long-term safety and efficacy in a large group of people affected by the disease. For a disease like Parkinson's disease, where the causes of the condition are not well understood, drugs targeting different biological pathways need to be tested to determine which ones may be useful in treating the symptoms, and which could be administered to slow down or stop the progression of the condition. Here, we provide an annual report on the current landscape of both these clinical testing efforts. In total, we reviewed 136 active studies evaluating therapies for Parkinson's disease registered on a clinical trial database called 'ClinicalTrials.gov'. Of these trials, approximately 55% were testing experimental symptomatic treatments, while the rest were focused on slowing down disease progression. More than half (58%) of the studies were in the second phase of clinical testing (short-term safety and preliminary efficacy), but only three studies were found to be testing treatments to stop the progression of Parkinson's in the Phase 3 testing. We concluded that the drug development pipeline for Parkinson's is robust, but more progress needs to be made with late-stage testing of treatments to slow the disease.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Objectively measuring Parkinson's disease (PD) signs and symptoms over time is critical for the successful development of treatments aimed at halting the disease progression of people with PD. Objective: To create a clinical trial simulation tool that characterizes the natural history of PD progression and enables a data-driven design of randomized controlled studies testing potential disease-modifying treatments (DMT) in early-stage PD. Methods: Data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) were analyzed with nonlinear mixed-effect modeling techniques to characterize the progression of MDS-UPDRS part I (non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living), part II (motor aspects of experiences of daily living), and part III (motor signs). A clinical trial simulation tool was built from these disease models and used to predict probability of success as a function of trial design. Results: MDS-UPDRS part III progresses approximately 3 times faster than MDS-UPDRS part II and I, with an increase of 3 versus 1 points/year. Higher amounts of symptomatic therapy is associated with slower progression of MDS-UPDRS part II and III. The modeling framework predicts that a DMT effect on MDS-UPDRS part III could precede effect on part II by approximately 2 to 3 years. Conclusions: Our clinical trial simulation tool predicted that in a two-year randomized controlled trial, MDS-UPDRS part III could be used to evaluate a potential novel DMT, while part II would require longer trials of a minimum duration of 3 to 5 years underscoring the need for innovative trial design approaches including novel patient-centric measures.

To develop effective medicines that can slow down or stop the progression of Parkinson's disease (PD), it is important to accurately understand how the disease worsens over time. We used data from an observational study, led by the Michael J. Fox Foundation, called the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) to understand the natural progression of  PD. We simulated clinical trials on a computer using different scales to measure the progression of PD. We specifically looked at a physician-reported measure MDS-UPDRS part III, and at a patient-reported measure MDS-UPDRS part II of how PD symptoms worsen over time. To measure the effect of a new medicine slowing down the progression of PD using patient-reported measure MDS-UPDRS part II, we estimate that we may need to conduct a clinical trial of at least 3 to 5 years. On the other hand, to measure an effect using physician-reported measure MDS-UPDRS part III, the duration of the trial could be shorter than 2 years. We were also able to show that worsening recorded by the physician-reported measure MDS-UPDRS part III could be predictive of a later worsening recorded by the patient-reported measure MDS-UPDRS part II. We concluded that MDS-UPDRS part III may be a good endpoint for a clinical trial of a reasonable duration and that MDS-UPDRS part II could be measured in longer studies, for example, open-label extensions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The increasing prevalence of people with Parkinson's disease (PD) necessitates a high priority for finding interventions to delay or even prevent the onset of PD. There is converging evidence that exercise may exert disease-modifying effects in people with clinically manifest PD, but whether exercise also has a preventive effect or is able to modify the progression of the pathology in the prodromal phase of PD is unclear. Here we provide some considerations on the design of trials that aim to prevent PD through exercise. First, we discuss the who could benefit from exercise, and potential exercise-related risks. Second, we discuss what specific components of exercise mediate the putative disease-modifying effects. Third, we address how methodological challenges such as blinding, adherence and remote monitoring could be handled and how we can measure the efficacy of exercise as modifier of the course of prodromal PD. We hope that these considerations help in designing exercise prevention trials for persons at risk of developing PD.

RESUMEN

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating, inflammatory skin condition characterized by infiltrating immune cells. Available treatments are limited to improving the signs and symptoms. There is an unmet need to develop therapies that target disease-driving pathways upstream of mast cell activation to inhibit or delay the progression of CSU and associated comorbidities. Here, we aim to define disease modification due to a treatment intervention and criteria that disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) must meet in CSU. We have defined disease modification in CSU as a favorable treatment-induced change in the underlying pathophysiology and, therefore, the disease course, which is clinically beneficial and enduring. A DMT must fulfil the following criteria: (1) prevents or delays the progression of CSU, (2) induces long-term, therapy-free clinical remission, which is the sustained absence of CSU signs and symptoms without the need for treatment, and (3) affects the underlying mechanism of CSU, as demonstrated by an effect on disease-driving signals and/or a biomarker. DMTs in CSU should slow disease progression, achieve long-lasting disease remission, target disease-driving mechanisms, reduce mast cell-activating IgE autoantibodies, target cytokine profile polarization, and normalize the gut microbiome and barrier. Treating CSU at the immune system level could provide valuable alternatives to pharmacotherapy in CSU management. Specific DMTs in CSU are yet to be developed, but some show potential benefits, such as inhibitors of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase, IL-4 and IL-13. Future therapies could prevent CSU signs and symptoms, achieve long-term clinical benefits after discontinuing treatment, and prevent associated concomitant disorders.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Development of Janus-kinase (JAK) inhibitors has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia (MPN). Following approval of the first JAK1/2-inhibitor Ruxolitinib, symptoms of this inflammatory disease, characterized by splenomegaly, release of inflammatory cytokines and appearance of thrombosis, could be effectively reduced for the first time. However, JAK-inhibitor treatment is limited in several aspects: 1) duration of response: 3 years after initiation of therapy more than 50% of patients have discontinued JAK-inhibitor treatment due to lack of efficacy or resistance; 2) reduction of disease burden: while effective in reducing inflammation and constitutional symptoms, JAK-inhibitors fail to reduce the malignant clone in the majority of patients and therefore lack long-term efficacy. Early clinical trials for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) have tried to address these issues for patients with suboptimal response to Ruxolitinib therapy while combination therapies with Fedratinib are rare. Recent reports provided first evidence on how the JAK2-V617F mutated myeloid cells may influence T-cell responses. JAK2-V617F promoted the synthesis of PD-L1 in MPN cells leading to limited anti-neoplastic T-cell responses, metabolic changes in T-cells and eventually JAK2-V617F-driven immune-escape of MPN cells. These findings may facilitate the use of immunotherapeutic approaches for JAK-mutated clones. Immune checkpoints refer to a variety of inhibitory pathways that are crucial for maintaining self-tolerance and modulating the duration and amplitude of physiological immune responses in peripheral tissues in order to minimize collateral tissue damage. The FRACTION study is a single arm, open label Phase II trial investigating the combination of Fedratinib with the PD-1 inhibitor Nivolumab in patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal or lack of response to JAK-inhibitor therapy. Over a 12 months period the trial assesses longer term outcomes, particularly the effects on clinical outcomes, such as induction of clinical remissions, quality of life and improvement of anemia. No prospective clinical trial data exist for combinations of JAK- and immune-checkpoint-inhibitors in the planned MF study population and this study will provide new findings that may contribute to advancing the treatment landscape for MF patients with suboptimal responses and limited alternatives.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease for which no disease-modifying therapies exist. Preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that repeated exposure to intermittent hypoxia might have short- and long-term benefits in PD. In a previous exploratory phase I trial, we demonstrated that in-clinic intermittent hypoxia exposure is safe and feasible with short-term symptomatic effects on PD symptoms. The current study aims to explore the safety, tolerability, feasibility, and net symptomatic effects of a four-week intermittent hypoxia protocol, administered at home, in individuals with PD. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a two-armed double-blinded randomized controlled trial involving 40 individuals with mild to moderate PD. Participants will receive 45 min of normobaric intermittent hypoxia (fraction of inspired oxygen 0.16 for 5 min interspersed with 5 min normoxia), 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Co-primary endpoints include nature and total number of adverse events, and a feasibility-tolerability questionnaire. Secondary endpoints include Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part II and III scores, gait tests and biomarkers indicative of hypoxic dose and neuroprotective pathway induction. DISCUSSION: This trial builds on the previous phase I trial and aims to investigate the safety, tolerability, feasibility, and net symptomatic effects of intermittent hypoxia in individuals with PD. Additionally, the study aims to explore induction of relevant neuroprotective pathways as measured in plasma. The results of this trial could provide further insight into the potential of hypoxia-based therapy as a novel treatment approach for PD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05948761 (registered June 20th, 2023).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We here explore whether observed treatment effects of a putative disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) are greater when cartilage morphometry is performed with rather than without knowledge of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition order (unblinded/blinded to time point). METHODS: In the FORWARD (FGF-18 Osteoarthritis Randomized Controlled Trial with Administration of Repeated Doses) randomized controlled trial, 549 knee osteoarthritis patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to three once-weekly intra-articular injections of placebo, 30 µg sprifermin every 6 or 12 months (M), or 100 µg every 6/12 M. After year 2, cartilage segmentation of BL through 24 M MRIs was performed, with blinding to acquisition order. After year 5, 24 and 60 M MRIs were analyzed together, with unknown relative order, but with segmented BL images as reference (24 M unblinded vs. BL), by the same operators. Total femorotibial joint cartilage thickness (TFTJ_ThC) change was obtained for 352 participants analyzed under both conditions. RESULTS: Twenty-four-month data read unblinded to order revealed a -35 ± 44 µm lower TFTJ_ThC than blinded analysis (all groups: lower/upper bounds -120/+51 µm; correlation r2 = 97%). With unblinded analysis, the placebo group lost -46 ± 57 µm TFTJ_ThC over 24 M, whereas 100 µg/every 6 M lost -2.2 ± 73 µm (difference =44 µm [95% CI: 22, 66]). With blinded analysis, placebo lost -11 ± 53 µm, whereas 100 µg/every 6 M gained 30 ± 62 µm (difference = 40 µm [95% CI: 21, 60]). 100 µg sprifermin injected every 6 M showed statistically significant (p < 0.001) treatment effects on TFTJ_ThC, with Cohen D = -0.66 for unblinded and D = -0.69 for blinded analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not reveal that detection of proposed DMOAD treatment is enhanced with MRIs read unblinded to order; rather, the sensitivity is similar to blinded analysis. Choices on blinded vs. unblinded analysis may thus be based on other criteria.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Huntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal-dominant disorder caused by a pathological expansion of a trinucleotide repeat (CAG) on exon 1 of the huntingtin (HTT) gene. HD is characterized by the presence of chorea, alongside other hyperkinesia, parkinsonism and a combination of cognitive and behavioural features. Currently, there are no disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for HD, and the only intervention(s) with approved indication target the treatment of chorea. This article reviews recent research on the clinical development of DMTs and newly developed tools that enhance clinical trial design towards a successful DMT in the future. RECENT FINDINGS: HD is living in an era of target-specific drug development with emphasis on the mechanisms related to mutant Huntingtin (HTT) protein. Examples include antisense oligonucleotides (ASO), splicing modifiers and microRNA molecules that aim to reduce the levels of mutant HTT protein. After initial negative results with ASO molecules Tominersen and WVE-120101/ WVE-120102, the therapeutic landscape continues to expand, with various trials currently under development to document proof-of-concept and safety/tolerability. Immune-targeted therapies have also been evaluated in early-phase clinical trials, with promising preliminary findings. The possibility of quantifying mHTT in CSF, along with the development of an integrated biological staging system in HD are important innovations applicable to clinical trial design that enhance the drug development process. Although a future in HD with DMTs remains a hope for those living with HD, care partners and care providers, the therapeutic landscape is promising, with various drug development programs underway following a targeted approach supported by disease-specific biomarkers and staging frameworks.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Currently, no disease-modifying therapies for osteoarthritis (OA) exist, and attempts to identify novel cellular targets have been challenging. Risk factors for OA include advanced age, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. This creates an attractive opportunity to repurpose existing drugs that are used to treat comorbidities commonly encountered in patients with OA, if those drugs possess OA disease modifying properties. METHODS: This narrative review incorporates findings from knee or hand OA randomized clinical trials, post-hoc clinical trial analyses, prospective cohort studies, and observational data. RESULTS: Drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (methotrexate; TNFa, IL-1, and IL-6 pathway inhibitors; hydroxychloroquine), atopic/allergic disease (anti-histamines), osteoporosis (bisphosphonates and vitamin D), type 2 diabetes (metformin and GLP-1 agonists), and cardiovascular disease (atorvastatin, fish oil, and beta blockers) were reviewed for their potential benefit in OA. This review outlines the successful attributes of repurposed drugs, the challenges in repurposing drugs, and strategies for future clinical trials to support OA drug repurposing. Potential drug candidates for OA may be identified through the use of existing datasets and via collaborations with researchers in other fields to include OA endpoints in future clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Given the association of OA with several commonly treated comorbidities, drug repurposing is an appealing approach that could provide a favorable benefit-to-risk ratio for chronic OA treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In 2011, the UK medical research charity Cure Parkinson's set up the international Linked Clinical Trials (iLCT) committee to help expedite the clinical testing of potentially disease modifying therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD). The first committee meeting was held at the Van Andel Institute in Grand Rapids, Michigan in 2012. This group of PD experts has subsequently met annually to assess and prioritize agents that may slow the progression of this neurodegenerative condition, using a systematic approach based on preclinical, epidemiological and, where possible, clinical data. Over the last 12 years, 171 unique agents have been evaluated by the iLCT committee, and there have been 21 completed clinical studies and 20 ongoing trials associated with the initiative. In this review, we briefly outline the iLCT process as well as the clinical development and outcomes of some of the top prioritized agents. We also discuss a few of the lessons that have been learnt, and we conclude with a perspective on what the next decade may bring, including the introduction of multi-arm, multi-stage clinical trial platforms and the possibility of combination therapies for PD.

Asunto(s)