RESUMEN
Measuring the abundance of microbes in a sample is a common procedure with a long history, but best practices are not well-conserved across microbiological ï¬elds. Serial dilution methods are commonly used to dilute bacterial cultures to produce countable numbers of colonies, and from these counts, to infer bacterial concentrations measured in colony-forming units (CFUs). The most common methods to generate data for CFU point estimates involve plating bacteria on (or in) a solid growth medium and counting their resulting colonies or counting the number of tubes at a given dilution that have growth. Traditionally, these types of data have been analyzed separately using different analytic methods. Here, we build a direct correspondence between these approaches, which allows one to extend the use of the most probable number method from the liquid tubes experiments, for which it was developed, to the growth plates by viewing colony-sized patches of a plate as equivalent to individual tubes. We also discuss how to combine measurements taken at different dilutions, and we review several ways of analyzing colony counts, including the Poisson and truncated Poisson methods. We test all point estimate methods computationally using simulated data. For all methods, we discuss their relevant error bounds, assumptions, strengths, and weaknesses. We provide an online calculator for these estimators.Estimation of the number of microbes in a sample is an important problem with a long history. Yet common practices, such as combining results from different measurements, remain sub-optimal. We provide a comparison of methods for estimating abundance of microbes and detail a mapping between different methods, which allows to extend their range of applicability. This mapping enables higher precision estimates of colony-forming units (CFUs) using the same data already collected for traditional CFU estimation methods. Furthermore, we provide recommendations for how to combine measurements of colony counts taken across dilutions, correcting several misconceptions in the literature.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias/clasificación , Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana/métodos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Distribución de PoissonRESUMEN
Pantoea agglomerans strain CPA-2 is an effective biocontrol agent (BCA) against the major postharvest pathogens present on pome and citrus fruits. Dehydration, such as freeze-drying, spray-drying and fluidized bed drying is one of the best ways to formulate BCAs. In this work, the survival of CPA-2 cells after formulation was determined by dilution plating and molecular methods as qPCR alone and combined with a sample pretreatment with a propidium monoazide dye (PMA-qPCR) and they were used to calculate treatment concentrations in efficacy trials on postharvest oranges. Furthermore, no significant differences in CPA-2 survival were observed as determined by dilution plating and PMA-qPCR after both the freeze drying and fluidized bed drying processes; however, an interesting significant difference was observed in the spray dried product comparing all quantitative methods. A difference of 0.48 and 2.17 log10 CFU or cells g/dw was observed among PMA-qPCR with qPCR and dilution plating, respectively. According to our study, dilution plating was shown to be an unreliable tool for monitoring the survival of CPA-2 after spray drying. In contrast, the combination of PMA and qPCR enabled a quick and unequivocal methodology to enumerate viable and VBNC CPA-2 cells under stress-dried conditions. Efficacy trials showed that, after 3 days, spray drying formulation rehydrated with 10% non-fat skimmed milk (NFSM) was as effective as fresh cells to control Penicillium digitatum in oranges.