RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in exploring combined interventions to achieve a more effective heparin-free treatment approach. AIM: to evaluate combination of interventions compared to standard practice (intermittent flushes) to prevent clotting and consequently reduce premature interruptions of hemodialysis. METHODS: This open-label randomized controlled trial recruited chronic hemodialysis patients with contra-indication to systemic heparinization. Participants were randomized into one of five groups to receive different strategies of heparin-free hemodialysis treatment for up to three sessions. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: the successful completion of hemodialysis without clotting. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: the clotting of the air traps assessed by a semi-quantitative scale, online KT/V, and safety of the interventions. RESULTS: Forty participants were recruited and randomized between May and December 2020. Participants showed similar baseline biochemistry results and coagulation profiles. The highest success rates were observed in group 3 (heparin-coated dialyzers combined with intermittent flushes) (100%) and group 5 (hemodiafiltration with online predilution combined with heparin-coated dialyzers), with 91% vs. the control (intermittent flushes) (64%). Group 2 (heparin-coated dialyzers alone) had the poorest success rate, with 38% of the sessions being prematurely terminated due to clotting. KT/V and clotting scores were similar between groups. No adverse events related to the trial interventions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed combination of interventions may have had additive effects, leading to less frequent clotting and the premature termination of an HD/HDF session. Our study supports the feasibility of conducting a larger randomized controlled trial focusing on the efficacy of combined interventions for heparin-free HD in patients with a high risk of bleeding.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hemodialyzers should efficiently eliminate small and middle molecular uremic toxins and possess exceptional hemocompatibility to improve well-being of patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, performance and hemocompatibility get compromised during treatment due to adsorption of plasma proteins to the dialyzer membrane. Increased membrane hydrophilicity reduces protein adsorption to the membrane and was implemented in the novel FX CorAL dialyzer. The present randomized controlled trial compares performance and hemocompatibility profiles of the FX CorAL dialyzer to other commonly used dialyzers applied in hemodiafiltration treatments. METHODS: This prospective, open, controlled, multicentric, interventional, crossover study randomized stable patients on post-dilution online hemodiafiltration (HDF) to FX CorAL 600, FX CorDiax 600 (both Fresenius Medical Care) and xevonta Hi 15 (B. Braun) each for 4 weeks. Primary outcome was ß2-microglobulin removal rate (ß2-m RR). Non-inferiority and superiority of FX CorAL versus comparators were tested. Secondary endpoints were RR and/or clearance of small and middle molecules, and intra- and interdialytic profiles of hemocompatibility markers, with regards to complement activation, cell activation/inflammation, platelet activation and oxidative stress. Further endpoints were patient reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical safety. RESULTS: 82 patients were included and 76 analyzed as intention-to-treat (ITT) population. FX CorAL showed the highest ß2-m RR (76.28%), followed by FX CorDiax (75.69%) and xevonta (74.48%). Non-inferiority to both comparators and superiority to xevonta were statistically significant. Secondary endpoints related to middle molecules corroborated these results; performance for small molecules was comparable between dialyzers. Regarding intradialytic hemocompatibility, FX CorAL showed lower complement, white blood cell, and platelet activation. There were no differences in interdialytic hemocompatibility, PROs, or clinical safety. CONCLUSIONS: The novel FX CorAL with increased membrane hydrophilicity showed strong performance and a favorable hemocompatibility profile as compared to other commonly used dialyzers in clinical practice. Further long-term investigations should examine whether the benefits of FX CorAL will translate into improved cardiovascular and mortality endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRATION: eMPORA III registration on 19/01/2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04714281).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Global warming and climate change represent the most significant threats to humanity in the 21st century, both of which are manmade catastrophes. Addressing climate change requires corrective action across all aspects of modern human life and work, including the medical field. Among healthcare sectors, dialysis units stand out as major contributors to plastic waste and excessive water consumption. It is imperative for hemodialysis units to lead by example in the judicious use of natural resources. This systemic review is aimed to establish a bare minimum of recommendations for environmental sustainability across Indian dialysis units, and to guide future initiatives to reduce the environmental impact of dialysis process. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, and Google to retrieve articles or studies related to green dialysis. The predefined keyword search yielded a total of 291 studies. A total of 54 studies and articles which were relevant to study question, and fulfilled inclusion criteria, were retrieved and analyzed to form opinions on the implementation of green dialysis initiatives from an Indian perspective. Green dialysis initiatives are much-needed reforms to be adopted by the Indian dialysis community. Through careful planning and minimal efforts, substantial amounts of water used in hemodialysis can be conserved and repurposed for other hospital activities. Similarly, the vast majority of discarded plastic waste can be recycled or reused. Despite controversy, reconsidering the risk-benefit aspects of dialyzer reuse is essential, particularly in the context of resource-limited developing nations like India.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Progressive clogging of the dialyzer membrane during hemodialysis can compromise solute removal efficiency. Existing solutions fall short in addressing intradialytic reduction of dialyzer clearance. This pilot study aims to assess the impact and safety of applying therapeutic ultrasonic waves to dialyzers for mitigating intradialytic clogging. METHODS: In this pilot study, 15 stable maintenance hemodialysis patients (12 males and 3 females) were enrolled. Each patient served as their own control. They underwent one session of hemodialysis with the application of therapeutic ultrasonic waves (Ultrasonic session) and were crossed-over to a second session without the use of ultrasonic waves (Control session). All the study sessions operated at a fixed dialysate flow rate of 500 mL/min and a blood flow rate of 250 or 300 mL/min. The adequacy of dialysis achieved during each session was monitored using Online Clearance Monitoring of the dialysis machines, and clearance K values, varying between 135 and 209 mL/min, were recorded, and plotted. A direct comparison between Control and Ultrasonic sessions was performed to assess the impact and safety of using ultrasonic waves during hemodialysis. FINDINGS: The mean percentage decline in dialyzer clearance values was 4.41% for Ultrasonic sessions (SD: 5.3) and 12.69% for Control sessions (SD: 6.35) (p-value <0.001). This indicates that the application of ultrasonic waves reduced the decline in clearance values. The mean differences of the blood component parameters were comparable between both Ultrasonic sessions and Control sessions, suggesting the safety of utilizing ultrasonic waves during dialysis. Microscopic membrane analysis corroborated the safety. DISCUSSION: Intradialytic clogging of dialyzer membranes is a significant problem that can cause dialysis inadequacy. Our study tackles this issue by introducing therapeutic ultrasonic waves to improve dialyzer clearance during hemodialysis sessions in patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Dialyzers are classified into five types based on their ß2-microglobulin clearance rate and albumin sieving coefficient: Ia, Ib, IIa, and IIb. In addition, a new classification system introduced a type S dialyzer. However, limited information is available regarding the impact of dialyzer type on patient outcomes. A cohort study was conducted using data from the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Renal Data Registry database. Total 181,804 patients on hemodialysis (HD) were included in the study, categorized into four groups (type Ia, IIa, IIb, and S). The associations between each group and two-year all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. Furthermore, propensity score-matching analysis was performed. By the end of 2019, 34,185 patients on dialysis had died. After adjusting for all confounders, the risk for all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the type IIa, and S groups than in the type Ia group. These significant findings were consistent after propensity score matching. In conclusion, our findings suggest that super high-flux dialyzers, with a ß2-microglobulin clearance of ≥ 70 mL/min, may be beneficial for patients on HD, regardless of their albumin sieving coefficient. In addition, type S dialyzers may be beneficial for elderly and malnourished patients on dialysis.Trial registration number: UMIN000018641.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: New generation helixone dialyzers has recently been developed as part of the ongoing effort to improve dialyzer hemocompatibility and avoid adverse reactions to synthetic dialyzers. This study aimed to assess the performance and albumin loss of this new dialyzer series in hemodiafiltration and compare it with the previous generation helixone series. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 19 patients. Each patient underwent eight dialysis sessions with the same routine dialysis parameters; only the dialyzer varied: FX60 CorDiax, FX CorAL 60, FX600 CorDiax, FX CorAL 600, FX80 CorDiax, FX CorAL 80, FX800 CorDiax, and FX CorAL 800. The reduction ratios (RR) of urea, creatinine, ß2-microglobulin, myoglobin, kappa-free immunoglobulin light chains (κFLC), prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, lambda immunoglobulin light chains (λFLC), and albumin were compared intra-individually. Dialysate albumin loss was also measured. RESULTS: All treatments were well tolerated. The mean amount of replacement fluid ranged from 31 to 34 L. Comparison of dialysis treatments showed no differences between small molecules and even up to those the size of ß2-microglobulins. Little differences were found between myoglobin, κFLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, and λFLC RRs, and only FX80 CorDiax was slightly superior to the others. Mean dialysate albumin losses were similar, with less than 2.5 g lost in each dialyzer. The FX80 CorDiax showed slightly higher global removal scores than the other dialyzers evaluated, except for FX CorAL 800. CONCLUSION: The new generation helixone dialyzers series has been updated to minimise the risk of adverse reactions, while maintaining the effectiveness and albumin loss achieved by the previous most advanced helixone generation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Middle uremic toxins (MUTs) can cause anemia and erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness. Theranova dialyzers may improve anemia management by removing MUTs. Hence, the impact of Theranova dialyzers on erythropoietin responsiveness was studied. METHODS: This exploratory single-center prospective observational study, encompassing 50 patients undergoing dialysis with either the Theranova-400 or FX80 membrane for 6 months, involved monthly tracking of hemoglobin levels, weight-adjusted erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (w-ESA) dosing, and erythropoietin resistance index (ERI), with ESA treatment decisions guided by a proprietary algorithm. RESULTS: The groups were similar in terms of demographics and baseline laboratory test results. The median hemoglobin levels, w-ESA and ERI, were found to be similar between FX80 and Theranova-400 groups at both baseline (11.06 vs 10.57, p = 0.808; 92.3 vs 105.2, p = 0.838; 8.1 vs 10.48, p = 0.876) and the end of the study (11.43 vs 11.03, p = 0.076; 48.7 vs 71.5; 4.48 vs 6.41, p = 0.310), respectively. There was a trend toward lower w-ESA and ERI at the end of the study compared to baseline in both groups, but the difference was non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study of 50 patients undergoing high-flux dialysis with near-target hemoglobin levels, switching to Theranova 400 dialyzers compared to FX80 dialyzers did not show statistically significant differences in maintaining hemoglobin levels, reducing ESA dose, or lowering ERI. The non-randomized design and small sample size limit the study's power to detect true differences. Larger, randomized trials are needed to confirm findings and definitively assess Theranova 400's benefits.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: New versions of the polyester polymer alloy (PEPA) membrane have appeared over the years, with increases in both the pore size and the amount of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) to optimize hydrophilicity performance. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the most recently developed PEPA dialyzer, the FDY series, in hemodialysis (HD) modality in terms of uremic toxin removal and albumin loss and to compare it with that of several high-flux dialyzers currently used in HD and post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out in 21 patients. All patients underwent six dialysis sessions with the same routine dialysis parameters; only the dialyzer and/or the dialysis modality varied: FX80 in HD, FDY 180 in HD, Clearum HS17 in HDF, Elisio 19H in HDF, Vitapes 180 in HDF, and FX80 in post-dilution HDF. The reduction ratios (RR) of urea, creatinine, ß2-microglobulin, myoglobin, κFLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, λFLC, and albumin were compared intraindividually. Dialysate albumin loss was also measured. RESULTS: Both membranes FDY and FX80 are high-flux dialyzers and are applied here in high-flux HD. The average RR of ß2-microglobulin was slightly lower in the two HD treatments than in the HDF treatments. Comparison of dialysis treatments revealed that the PEPA FDY dialyzer in the HD modality was more effective than the FX80 dialyzer in high-flux HD and was as effective as post-dilution HDF, especially in terms of myoglobin, κFLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, and λFLC RRs. The FDY treatments obtained similar albumin RR in blood and slightly higher dialysate albumin loss, although the values were clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The most recently developed PEPA dialyzers in the HD modality were as effective as all treatments in the HDF modality and were clearly superior to high-flux helixone HD treatment. These results confirm that this dialyzer should be categorized within the medium cut-off (MCO) membrane classification.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This review provides a detailed analysis of hemodiafiltration (HDF), its progress from an emerging technique to a potential conventional treatment for chronic hemodialysis patients, and its current status. The article covers the advances, methods, and clinical benefits of HDF, specifically focusing on its impact on cardiovascular health, survival rates, and overall well-being. The review also addresses questions about the safety of HDF and provides evidence to dispel concerns related to the elimination of beneficial substances and infection risks. Additionally, the article explores the potential implications of expanded hemodialysis (HDx) as an alternative to HDF, its classification, safety profile, and an ongoing trial assessing its non-inferiority to HDF. Supported by evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies, the review emphasizes the superiority of HDF as a hemodialysis modality and advocates for its positioning as the gold standard in treatment. However, it acknowledges the need for extensive research to define the role of HDx in comprehensive treatment approaches in individuals undergoing dialysis. The synthesis of current knowledge underscores the importance of ongoing exploration and research to refine hemodialysis practices for optimal patient outcomes.

RESUMEN

Background: We aimed to investigate the change in the large middle molecule (>15 kDa) removal rate, which is associated with vascular calcification, when using a medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzer compared to a high-flux (HF) dialyzer. Methods: Twenty patients with clinically stable maintenance hemodialysis were investigated over a 15-week study period. Dialyzer efficacies were evaluated during the last midweek hemodialysis treatment for each consecutive dialyzer membrane use: 1st HF, MCO, and 2nd HF dialyzer; 5 weeks each period. Changes in α1-microglobulin (33 kDa) during a dialysis session were analyzed to assess the efficacy of the MCO dialyzer as a reference. The levels and reduction ratios of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23, 32 kDa), osteoprotegerin (OPG, 60 kDa), and sclerostin (22 kDa) were analyzed. Large middle molecules were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Serum hemoglobin, phosphorus, and corrected calcium levels were not significantly different for each dialyzer period. Total protein and albumin values during the MCO dialyzer period did not decrease compared with the HF dialyzer period. The reduction ratio of α1-microglobulin was significantly higher in the MCO dialyzer than in the HF dialyzer (p < 0.001). The reduction ratios of FGF23 (p < 0.001), OPG (p < 0.001), and sclerostin (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the MCO dialyzer than those in the HF dialyzer. Conclusion: The reduction rate of large middle molecules related to vascular calcification, such as FGF23, OPG, and sclerostin, was significantly higher when using the MCO dialyzer than the HF dialyzer.

RESUMEN

Dialysis reactions are not uncommon in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients who are undergoing in-center hemodialysis. Here we report the first case of anaphylaxis related to citric acid solutions used for dialysis machine disinfection and descaling. The patient developed repeated episodes of anaphylactic reactions during hemodialysis only in the inpatient setting leading to respiratory failure needing intubation and anaphylactic shock. This had failed to resolve despite using various combinations of different dialysis machines and dialyzer membranes and only resolved after the elimination of citric acid from the dialysis circuit. This case highlights the importance of different allergens in dialysis circuits and emphasizes the importance of looking for alternative reasons for dialyzer reactions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clearum™ is a high flux steam sterilized dialyzer for patients with hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration. This study evaluated the safety and performance of the Clearum high flux steam sterilized hemodialyzer in the removal of small and middle-sized toxins. METHODS: A prospective, interventional, nonrandomized study enrolled twenty end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis. The Clearum high flux steam sterilized dialyzer was compared to Fresenius FX dialyzers for baseline comparison. The duration of the trial was 2 weeks for the FX dialyzer and 6 weeks with the Clearum high flux steam sterilized dialyzer. In vitro studies with dextrans of varying sizes were performed to compare the membrane characteristics and sieving coefficient curves for the two dialyzers. RESULTS: The primary objective of a mean urea reduction ratio >65% was met, with no significant difference in mean urea reduction ratio between the Clearum high flux steam sterilized and Fresenius FX-series of dialyzers (p = 0.86). No dialyzer-related adverse events were reported in the study. ß-2-microglobulin reduction with the Clearum high flux steam sterilized dialyzer was statistically higher than the FX-series dialyzer (66.5% vs. 53.6%; p < 0.0001). Predialysis interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein concentrations, blood-rest scores (residual blood after blood restitution), and thrombin-anti-thrombin values were comparable. Albumin remained stable during the 6 weeks of Clearum high flux steam sterilized dialyzer use, with no appreciable differences compared to the Fresenius FX-series. CONCLUSION: The Clearum high flux steam sterilized dialyzer showed good mid-term effectivity for small and middle molecule removal with no reported dialyzer-related adverse events.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective @#To explore the prevalence of uremic pruritus (UP) in patients with maintenance hemodialy sis (MHD) in Anhui Province and its influential factors .@*Methods @#Patients with MHD were enrolled in 27 hemo dialysis centers in Anhui Province . Clinical data were compared .@*Results @#A total of 3 025 patients with MHD were included . The prevalence of UP was 63.3% , among them , mild UP 55.9% and moderate to severe UP 7.4% . The prevalence rates of UP in southern Anhui , central Anhui and northern Anhui were 75.4% , 63.6% and 57.9% . The prevalence of total UP in ≤30 years , 31 - 50 years , 51 - 70 years and ≥71 years was 53.5% ,59.8% , 65.4% and 65.9% . The prevalence of total UP and moderate to severe UP increased with age ( P < 0.01) . Age , age of dialysis , proportion of hypertension , 25(hydroxy) vitamin D3 [25(OH)D3 ] , proportion of low flux dialyzer usage and proportion of calcium phosphorus binder usage in UP group were higher than those in the group without UP. However , the levels of diastolic blood pressure , hemoglobin ( Hb) and hemodialysis filtration ratio in the UP group were lower than those in the non UP group (P < 0.05) . By comparison , the age , hyperten sion and diabetes of patients in moderate and severe UP group were higher than those in mild UP group , while the proportion of non calcium phosphorus binding was lower than that in mild UP group ( P < 0.05) . Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that high 25(OH)D3 was associated with a higher risk of UP in MHD patients , and high throughput dialyzer use was associated with a lower risk of UP in MHD patients ( P < 0.05) .@*Conclusion @#The prevalence rate of UP in maintenance hemodialysis patients in Anhui province is 63.3% . The prevalence of UP is the highest in southern Anhui , and the prevalence of total UP and moderate to severe UP increases with age . High 25(OH)D3 levels are a risk factor for UP in MHD patients , and the use of high throughput dialyzers can reduce the risk of UP in MHD patients .

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes may be able to remove middle-large uremic toxins that are retained in the body, which has been linked to various risk factors including malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS). The effect of MCO dialyzers on MIS has been studied. METHODS: This single-center exploratory prospective observational study enrolled maintenance hemodialysis patients who underwent dialysis using either MCO (Theranova 400) or high-flux (FX80) membranes as part of their regular care. Measurements of MIS, body weight, height, body mass index, and various biochemical markers were taken at the beginning and conclusion of the study. RESULTS: This study included 50 patients who were treated with either the Theranova 400 (n = 25) or the FX80 (n = 25) for a period of 6 months. The two groups were similar in terms of demographics, duration of hemodialysis treatment, and baseline biochemical test results. Theranova 400 had no significant impact on the median MIS (6 [6-10] vs. 7 [5-10], p 0.575) and serum albumin levels (4.07 [3.92-4.22] vs. 4.04 [3.85-4.30], p 0.689), while the FX80 resulted in a significant increase in MIS (6 [5-8] vs. 8 [6-10], p 0.033) and a significant decrease in serum albumin levels (4.23 [4.03-4.36] vs. 3.98 [3.77-4.12], p 0.027) at the end of the study. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: After 6 months of treatment, the MCO dialyzer did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the MIS when compared to the high-flux dialyzer. However, MIS worsening was significantly less in the MCO group, indicating the potential benefits of MCO membranes in maintaining nutritional status. Further research is required to validate these results.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The mechanisms behind reported decreases in plasma insulin and glucagon during hemodialysis (HD) are not clear. Here, we investigated these mechanisms during HD treatment and the characteristics of insulin and glucagon removal when using two super high-flux membranes. In an experimental study, clearance, adsorption rates, and reduction rates of insulin and glucagon were investigated when using cellulose triacetate (CTA) and polysulfone (PS) membranes in a closed circuit using bovine blood. In a clinical study, 20 diabetes patients with end-stage kidney disease who were stable on HD were randomly selected for two HD sessions with two different membranes. At 1 h after the initiation of HD, insulin and glucagon clearance were measured, and the reduction rates were also investigated. In the experimental study, the PS membrane showed significantly higher clearance, adsorption rates, and reduction rates of insulin and glucagon compared with the CTA membrane. Although glucagon was detected in the ultrafiltration fluids in both membranes, insulin was absent in the PS membrane. In the clinical study, both membranes showed significant reductions in plasma insulin and glucagon at each time point. The PS membrane showed significantly higher insulin clearance and reduction rates compared with the CTA membrane. The two membranes showed no significant difference in glucagon clearance, but the glucagon reduction rate was significantly higher with the PS membrane. Our findings show that HD with the two super high-flux membranes used removes significant amounts of glucoregulatory peptide hormones from plasma in patients with diabetes and end-stage kidney disease, potentially affecting their glucose metabolism.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Membrane dialysis is one of the membrane contactors applied to wastewater treatment. The dialysis rate of a traditional dialyzer module is restricted because the solutes transport through the membrane only by diffusion, in which the mass-transfer driving force across the membrane is the concentration gradient between the retentate and dialysate phases. A two-dimensional mathematical model of the concentric tubular dialysis-and-ultrafiltration module was developed theoretically in this study. The simulated results show that the dialysis rate improvement was significantly improved through implementing the ultrafiltration effect by introducing a trans-membrane pressure during the membrane dialysis process. The velocity profiles of the retentate and dialysate phases in the dialysis-and-ultrafiltration system were derived and expressed in terms of the stream function, which was solved numerically by the Crank-Nicolson method. A maximum dialysis rate improvement of up to twice that of the pure dialysis system (Vw=0) was obtained by employing a dialysis system with an ultrafiltration rate of Vw=2 mL/min and a constant membrane sieving coefficient of θ=1. The influences of the concentric tubular radius, ultrafiltration fluxes and membrane sieve factor on the outlet retentate concentration and mass transfer rate are also illustrated.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The introduction of high flux (HF) hemodialyzers and their application in single dialyzer hemodiafiltration (sdHDF) for patients on extracorporeal dialysis (ECD) therapy has improved the extraction of uremic toxins, including the low molecular weight protein (LMWP) beta 2 microglobulin (ß2M, 11.6 kDa). Similar increases in the extraction of protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUT) and larger LMWP (15-50 kDa) remain elusive. High concomitant losses of albumin prohibit the use of medium cutoff (MCO) or protein-losing hemodialyzers for sdHDF to increase the extraction of these molecules by convective transfer. METHODS: A new extracorporeal dialysis treatment modality, dual dialyzer hemodiafiltration (ddHDF), has been designed together with a mathematical model to compare its predicted performance to that of sdHDF in the extraction of solute. The extra process that distinguishes ddHDF from sdHDF is the secondary ultrafiltration and partial reinfusion of the effluent hemodiafiltrate from the primary hemodialyzer. This allows MCO and protein-losing hemodialyzers to be used to increase the extraction of both LMWP and PBUT without excessive concomitant loss of albumin. RESULTS: Data from the mathematical model show that ddHDF could increase the extraction of smaller and larger LMWP by an extra 102% and 220%, respectively, compared to standard HF sdHDF, while restricting the loss of albumin to 0.83 g per hour of treatment. In using albumin as a recyclable carrier molecule for the extraction of PBUT from plasma ddHDF has the potential to increase PBUT reduction ratios (RR's) to 49% by convection alone. Even higher RR's are possible if the dialysate volume flow rate can be increased beyond 600 mL/min. CONCLUSION: ddHDF provides an opportunity for a step change increase in the level of extraction of both larger LMWP and PBUT in patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Chondroitin sulfate (ChS) from marine sources is gaining attention. The purpose of this study was to extract ChS from jumbo squid cartilage (Dosidicus gigas) using ultrasound-assisted enzymatic extraction (UAEE). An ultrasound with protease assistance, including either alcalase, papain or Protin NY100 was used to extract ChS. The results showed that alcalase had the best extraction efficiency. The response surface methodology was employed to evaluate the relationship between extraction conditions and extraction yield of ChS. The ridge max analysis revealed a maximum extraction yield of 11.9 mg ml- 1 with an extraction temperature of 59.40 °C, an extraction time of 24.01 min, a pH of 8.25, and an alcalase concentration of 3.60%. Compared to ethanol precipitation, purification using a hollow fiber dialyzer (HFD) had a higher extraction yield of 62.72% and purity of 85.96%. The structure characteristics of ChS were identified using FTIR, 1 H-NMR, and 13 C-NMR to confirm that the purified ChS structure was present in the form of chondroitin-4-sulfate and chondroitin-6-sulfate. The results of this study provide a green and efficient process for extraction and purification of ChS and are essential for the use of ChS for the development and production of nutrient food products or pharmaceuticals. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13197-023-05701-7.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Medium-cut-off (MCO) dialyzers may beneficially impact outcomes in patients on hemodialysis. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled trial in maintenance hemodialysis patients, the new Nipro ELISIO-17HX MCO dialyzer was compared to the Baxter Theranova 400 filter regarding middle molecule removal. Furthermore, the suitability of two assays for free lambda-light chain (λFLC) detection (Freelite vs. N-Latex) was verified. RESULTS: ELISIO-HX achieved slightly lower reduction ratios for ß2 -microglobulin (71.8 ± 6.0 vs. 75.3 ± 5.8%; p = 0.001), myoglobin (54.7 ± 8.6 vs. 64.9 ± 8.7%; p < 0.001), and kappa-FLC (62.1 ± 8.8 vs. 56.3 ± 7.7%; p = 0.021). λFLC reduction ratios were more conclusive with the Freelite assay and not different between ELISIO-HX and Theranova (28.4 ± 3.9 vs. 38.7 ± 13.4%; p = 0.069). The albumin loss of Theranova was considerably higher (2.14 ± 0.45 vs. 0.77 ± 0.25 g; p = 0.001) and the Global Removal ScoreLoss alb largely inferior (30.6 ± 7.4 vs. 82.4 ± 29.2%/g; p = 0.006) to ELISIO-HX. CONCLUSIONS: The new ELISIO-HX expands the choice of dialyzers for MCO hemodialysis.

Asunto(s)